Myocardial perfusion sequences

13 15 0
Myocardial perfusion sequences

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

Myocardial Perfusion Sequences Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Image Acquisition • ECG triggering: repeats same few slices every heartbeat   Post injection Baseline equilibrium Contrast Bolus injection Image acquisition Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion • Each slice consists of a magnetization prep and a data collection R R ECG Slice # Prepare Magnetization T1 Sensitivity (90o SR prep) Acquire Image (slice) Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion • Two possible types of magnetization preparation • Inversion Recovery (180o pulse) – Very strong T1 contrast – Multi-slice imaging not feasible – Sensitive to arrhythmia • Saturation Recovery (90o pulse) – Weaker T1 contrast – Multi-slice imaging capable – Insensitive to arrhythmia Most commonly used Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Saturation Recovery (90) Preparation R ECG Trigger Mz 0,80 TI 90° N ||||||||||||||||||| Non-Ischemic Myocardium (short T1) evolution period 0,60 acquisition period 0,40 Ischemic Myocardium (long T1) 0,20 0,00 100 200 300 400 500 time / msec • T1 contrast weaker than IR • Insensitivity to Arrhythmia • Multi-slice capabilities • CNR & SNR depend on TI Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Adjusting the TI R R ECG Trigger Acquisition Window 90°    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TI (> minimum) The shortest possible TI (zero Use Extra Evolution Time evolution period) reduces the total time to acquire the slice, 90° but reduces the CNR & SNR    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TI (= minimum) Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion • acquires a few slices every heartbeat R R ECG Trigger Acquisition Window 90°  slice | | | | | TI 90°  slice | | | | | TI Echo-Spacing 90°  slice | | | | | TI Trig Delay (typically zero) TR TR Ti Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Pulse Sequences • TurboFLASH – – – – Inherent T1-weighting Insensitive to off-resonance As short as msec per line Low SNR due to high BW and short TR • TrueFISP – – – – Most commonly used Inherent T1/T2 weighting Sensitive to off-resonance As short as 2.2 msec per line High SNR due to steady-state signal contribution TurboFLASH  vs TrueFISP   TR TR Gslice Gslice Gread Gread Gphase Gphase Spoiler Pulse + Unbalanced Gradients: Insensitive to Field Inhomogeneity Artifacts Lower SNR  Steady State + Balanced Gradients: Plagued by Field Inhomogeneity Artifacts Higher SNR Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Pulse Sequences TurboFLASH Spoiler Pulse + Unbalanced Gradients: Insensitive to Field Inhomogeneity Artifacts Lower SNR TrueFISP Steady State + Balanced Gradients: Plagued by Field Inhomogeneity Artifacts Higher SNR Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Option 1: Using iPAT alone has advantages, but disadvantage R R ECG Trigger Acquisition Window 90°    No iPAT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TR Evolution + Longer evolution time = better CNR 90°    ||||| | | Evolution + Shorter TR = more slices + Shorter data period = less motion sensitive TI With iPAT Using iPAT alone each slice has: | | - Fewer echoes = decreased SNR Note: TI is same in both, time to center of data TR Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Option 2: Using iPAT with Lower Bandwidth has advantages, but disadvantage R R ECG Trigger Acquisition Window 90°    No iPAT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using iPAT with Lower Bandwidth each slice has: TR Evolution + Decreased bandwidth = better SNR TI 90°    With iPAT | | | | | | Evolution + Wider echo spacing = better CNR | | | TR + Better SNR = allows higher matrix - Fewer echoes = decreased SNR Note: TI is same in both, time to center of data Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Rest Rest 128 Matrix + no iPAT 192 Matrix + iPATx2 + Lower BW Stress Stress Dr Ching Hon Luk, Sir Run Run Shaw Heart Center, Hong Kong ... First-Pass Perfusion • Each slice consists of a magnetization prep and a data collection R R ECG Slice # Prepare Magnetization T1 Sensitivity (90o SR prep) Acquire Image (slice) Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion. ..  slice | | | | | TI Trig Delay (typically zero) TR TR Ti Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Pulse Sequences • TurboFLASH – – – – Inherent T1-weighting Insensitive to off-resonance As short... Balanced Gradients: Plagued by Field Inhomogeneity Artifacts Higher SNR Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Pulse Sequences TurboFLASH Spoiler Pulse + Unbalanced Gradients: Insensitive to Field Inhomogeneity

Ngày đăng: 13/08/2020, 09:13

Mục lục

  • Slide 1

  • Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Image Acquisition

  • Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion

  • Slide 4

  • Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Saturation Recovery (90) Preparation

  • Slide 6

  • Slide 7

  • Dynamic First-Pass Perfusion Pulse Sequences

  • TurboFLASH vs TrueFISP

  • Slide 10

  • Slide 11

  • Slide 12

  • Slide 13

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan