Tài liệu nước ngoài

Một phần của tài liệu Ảnh hưởng của bổ sung dầu hạt lanh vào khẩu phần đến năng suất và chất lượng chứng gà ISA SHAVER (Trang 73 - 87)

22. Amal, S. Omar., Nehad A Ramandan, Bahakaim A.S.A, Sahar M.H Osman and Abdel Malak N.Y., (2014). Effect of using different levels of fish oil, linseed oil and their combination in layer diets on egg omega 3 enrichment, J. Animal and Poultry Prod, Mansoura Univ., Vol. 5 (12):

759-774.

23. Ana Beatriz Garcia Faitarone Rua (2016), “Yolk Color and Lipid Oxidation of the Eggs of Commercial White Layers Fed Diets Supplemented with Vegetable Oils”. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. vol.18 no.1 Campinas Jan./Mar. Năm 2016

24. Ansari R., Azarbayejani A., Ansari S. Asgari S. and Gheisari A. (2006),

“Production of egg enriched with omega-3 fatty axits in laying hens, ARYA J., 1, 242- 246.

25. Baixao NC, Lara LJC (2005), “Oil and fat in broiler nutrition, Braz J Poult Sci;1:129-141.

26. Bean I.D. and Leeson S. (2003), “Long-term effect of feeding linseed on performance and egg fatty axit composition of brown and white hens, Poult. Sci., 82, 388- 394.

27. Card L.E. and Nesheim M.C. (1970), Production avicola, Ciencia Tecnica, La Habana.

28. Caston L. and Leeson S. (1990), Dietary flax and egg composition ,

Poult. Sci., 69, 1617-1620.

29. Carrillo-Dominguez S., Carranco-Jauregui I.M.E., Castillo-Domynguez R.M. and Castro-Gonza lez M.I. (2005), “Cholesterol and n-3 and n-6 fatty axit content in eggs from laying hens fed with red crab meal (Pleuroncodes planipes)”, Poult. Sci., 84, 167-172.

30. Ebeid T., Eid Y., Saleh A. and Abd El-Hamid H. (2008), “Ovarian follicular development, lipid peroxidation, antioxidative status and immune response in laying hens fed fish oil-supplemented diets to produce n-3-enriched eggs”, Animal, 2, 84-91.

31. Filardi R.D.S., Junqueira O.M., de Laurentiz A.C., Casartelli E.M., Aparecida R.E. and Francelino A.L. (2005),Influence of different fat sources on the performance, egg quality, and lipid profile of egg yolks of commercial layers in the second laying cycle”, J. Appl. Poult. Res., 14, 258-264.

32. Goncuglu E. and Ergun A. (2004), “The effect of linseed oil to egg quality, fatty axits and cholesterol content of egg yolk in laying hens, 22nd World Poultry Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 2004.

33. Gonzalez-Esquerra R. and Leeson S. (2000), “Effect of feeding hens regular or deodorized menhaden oil on production parameters, Yolk fatty axit profile, and sensory quality of eggs, Poult. Sci., 79, 1597- 1602.

34. Grobas S., Mendez J., Lazaros R., Blas C.D., Mateos G.G.and De B.C.

(2001), “Influence of source of fat added to diet on performance and fatty axit composition of egg yolks of two strains of laying hens”, Poult. Sci., 80, 1171-1179.

35. Hargis P.S. and Van Elswyk M.E. (1993), “Manipulating the fatty axit composition of poultry meat and eggs for the health conscious consumer”, World’s Poult. Sci. J., 49, 251-264.

36. Hargis P.S., Van Elswyk M.E. and Hargis B.M. (1991), “Dietary

modification of yolk lipids with menhaden oil”, Poult. Sci.,70, 874- 883.

37. Jeffri D, Firman H, Kamyab A (2010), “Comparison of soybean oil with an animal/vegetable blend at four energy levels in broiler rations from hatch to market”, Int Poult Sci:1027-1030.

38. Jiang Z., Fenton M. and Sim J.S. (1991), “Comparison of four different methods for egg cholesterol determination, Poult.Sci., 70, 1015-1019.

39. Latshaw JD (2008), “Daily energy intake of broiler chickens is altered by proximate nutrient content and form of the diet, Poult Sci;89-95.

40. Letner T.M and Taylor (1987), The interation of egg production in the domestic fow, P.Amer, Hat 77, 1943.

41. Manilla HA, Husveth F, Nemeth K (1999), “Effects of dietary fat origin on the performance of broiler chickens and on the fatty axit composition of selected tissues, Acta Agraria Kaposvariensis:375-385.

42. Newman R.E, Bryden W.L, Fleck E, Ashes J.R, Buttemer W.A, Storlien L.H, Downing J.A (2002), “Dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty axits alter avian metabolism: molecular-species composition of breast-muscle phospholipids, Br J Nutr:19-28.

43. Novak C. and Scheideler S.E. (2001), “Long-term effects of feeding linseed- based diets. 1. Egg production parameters, components, and eggshell quality in two strains of laying hens”, Poult. Sci., 80, 1480- 1489.

44. Scheideler, S.E. and G.W.Froning. (1996). The combined influence of dietary flaxseed variety, level, form and storage condition on egg production and composition among vitamin Esupplemented hens. Poult.

Sci. 75: 1221- 1226.

45. Schreiner M., Hulan H.W., Razzazi-Fazeli, E., Bohm J. and Iben C.

(2004), “Feeding laying hens seal blubber oil: Effects on egg yolk incorporation, stereospecific distribution of omega-3 fatty axits, and sensory aspects”, Poult. Sci., 83,462- 473.

46. Silke H.S., Nutztierethologie F.G. and Kleintierzucht U.(2008), Effect of genetic types with two types of dietary fats on performance and egg yolk fatty axits in laying hens, Eur.Poult. Sci., 72, 177- 184.

47. Wongsuthavas S, Terapuntuwat S, Wongsrikeaw W, Katawatin S, Yuangklang C, Beynen AC (2008), Influence of amount and type of fat deposition, adipocyte count and iodine number of abdominal fat in broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr:92-98.

48. Yannakopoulos A.L., Tserveni-Gousi A.S. and Yannakakis S. (1999),

Effect of feeding linseed to laying hens on the performance and egg quality and fatty axit composition of egg yolk, Arch. fur Geflu¨

gelkunde, 63, 260- 263.

MỘT SỐ HÌNH ẢNH TRONG QUÁ TRÌNH THỰC HIỆN ĐỀ TÀI

Hình 1. Cân dầu lanh Hình 2. Cân khối lượng vỏ trứng

Hình 3. Cân khối lượng trứng Hình 4. Cân khối lượng lòng đỏ

Hình 5: Lô thí nghiệm 1 Hình 6: Lô thí nghiệm 2

Hình 7: Khảo sát khối lượng trứng Hình 8: Chăm sóc gà thí nghiệm

Phụ lục

KẾT QUẢ XỬ LÝ THỐNG KÊ

————— 12/18/2016 4:18:12 PM ————————————————————

Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help.

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN1, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 254.6 127.3 11.85 0.000 Error 21 225.7 10.7

Total 23 480.3

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev --+---+---+---+---- DC 8 75.536 4.243 (---*---)

TN1 8 83.335 2.052 (---*---) TN2 8 77.976 3.166 (---*---)

--+---+---+---+---- Pooled StDev = 3.278 73.5 77.0 80.5 84.0

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN1

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 243.3 243.3 21.90 0.000 Error 14 155.5 11.1

Total 15 398.8

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev --+---+---+---+---- DC 8 75.536 4.243 (---*---)

TN1 8 83.335 2.052 (---*---) --+---+---+---+---- Pooled StDev = 3.333 73.5 77.0 80.5 84.0

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 23.8 23.8 1.70 0.213 Error 14 196.2 14.0

Total 15 220.0

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- DC 8 75.536 4.243 (---*---)

TN2 8 77.976 3.166 (---*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 3.744 75.0 77.5 80.0

One-way ANOVA: TN1, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 114.86 114.86 16.14 0.001 Error 14 99.63 7.12

Total 15 214.49

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- TN1 8 83.335 2.052 (---*---) TN2 8 77.976 3.166 (---*---)

---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 2.668 78.0 81.0 84.0

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN1, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 1122.6 561.3 11.84 0.000 Error 21 995.4 47.4

Total 23 2118.0

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- DC 8 158.63 8.91 (---*---)

TN1 8 175.00 4.31 (---*---) TN2 8 163.75 6.65 (---*---)

---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 6.88 160.0 168.0 176.0

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN1

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 1072.6 1072.6 21.89 0.000 Error 14 685.9 49.0

Total 15 1758.4

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- DC 8 158.63 8.91 (---*---)

TN1 8 175.00 4.31 (---*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 7.00 160.0 168.0 176.0

One-way ANOVA: DC, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 105.1 105.1 1.70 0.213 Error 14 865.4 61.8

Total 15 970.4

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+---+- DC 8 158.63 8.91 (---*---)

TN2 8 163.75 6.65 (---*---) ---+---+---+---+- Pooled StDev = 7.86 155.0 160.0 165.0 170.0

One-way ANOVA: TN1, TN2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 506.3 506.3 16.13 0.001 Error 14 439.5 31.4

Total 15 945.8

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+---+- TN1 8 175.00 4.31 (---*---) TN2 8 163.75 6.65 (---*---)

---+---+---+---+- Pooled StDev = 5.60 162.0 168.0 174.0 180.0

One-way ANOVA: DC (Chi phi), TN1 (Chi phi), TN2 (Chi phi)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 647.716 323.858 589.13 0.000 Error 24 13.193 0.550

Total 26 660.909

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev -+---+---+---+--- DC (Chi 9 14.177 0.727 (-*)

TN1 (Chi 9 18.586 0.432 (*-)

TN2 (Chi 9 26.045 0.966 (*-) -+---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.741 14.0 17.5 21.0 24.5

One-way ANOVA: DC (Chi phi), TN1 (Chi phi)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 87.468 87.468 244.37 0.000 Error 16 5.727 0.358

Total 17 93.195

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- DC (Chi 9 14.177 0.727 (--*-)

TN1 (Chi 9 18.586 0.432 (--*--) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.598 15.0 16.5 18.0

One-way ANOVA: DC (Chi phi), TN1 (Chi phi)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 87.468 87.468 244.37 0.000 Error 16 5.727 0.358

Total 17 93.195

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- DC (Chi 9 14.177 0.727 (--*-)

TN1 (Chi 9 18.586 0.432 (--*--) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.598 15.0 16.5 18.0

One-way ANOVA: TN1 (Chi phi), TN2 (Chi phi)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 250.343 250.343 447.07 0.000 Error 16 8.960 0.560

Total 17 259.302

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- TN1 (Chi 9 18.586 0.432 (-*-)

TN2 (Chi 9 26.045 0.966 (-*-) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.748 20.0 22.5 25.0

One-way ANOVA: DC (TA/10T), TN1 (TA/10T), TN2 (TA/10T)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 0.09943 0.04972 11.87 0.000 Error 21 0.08796 0.00419

Total 23 0.18740

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev --+---+---+---+---- DC (TA/1 8 1.5938 0.0867 (---*---) TN1 (TA/ 8 1.4388 0.0352 (---*---)

TN2 (TA/ 8 1.5413 0.0617 (---*---) --+---+---+---+---- Pooled StDev = 0.0647 1.400 1.470 1.540 1.610

One-way ANOVA: DC (TA/10T), TN1 (TA/10T)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 0.09610 0.09610 21.96 0.000 Error 14 0.06127 0.00438

Total 15 0.15738

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev --+---+---+---+---- DC (TA/1 8 1.5938 0.0867 (---*---) TN1 (TA/ 8 1.4388 0.0352 (---*---)

--+---+---+---+---- Pooled StDev = 0.0662 1.400 1.470 1.540 1.610

One-way ANOVA: DC (TA/10T), TN2 (TA/10T)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 0.01102 0.01102 1.95 0.185 Error 14 0.07928 0.00566

Total 15 0.09030

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ----+---+---+---+-- DC (TA/1 8 1.5938 0.0867 (---*---) TN2 (TA/ 8 1.5413 0.0617 (---*---)

----+---+---+---+-- Pooled StDev = 0.0752 1.500 1.550 1.600 1.650

One-way ANOVA: TN1 (TA/10T), TN2 (TA/10T) Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 0.04203 0.04203 16.63 0.001 Error 14 0.03538 0.00253

Total 15 0.07740

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- TN1 (TA/ 8 1.4388 0.0352 (---*---)

TN2 (TA/ 8 1.5413 0.0617 (---*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.0503 1.450 1.500 1.550

————— 1/4/2017 3:54:56 PM ————————————————————

Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help.

Retrieving project from file: E:\PHANME~1\MTBWIN\HAT LANH (SON).MPJ

One-way ANOVA: RDC(1), RTN1 (1), RTN2 (2)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 0.067 0.033 0.17 0.845 Error 27 5.300 0.196

Total 29 5.367

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- RDC(1) 10 8.7000 0.4830 (---*---) RTN1 (1) 10 8.8000 0.4216 (---*---) RTN2 (2) 10 8.8000 0.4216 (---*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.4431 8.60 8.80 9.00

One-way ANOVA: RDC (28), RTN1(28), RTN2(28)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 19.467 9.733 41.06 0.000 Error 27 6.400 0.237

Total 29 25.867

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- RDC (28) 10 8.800 0.422 (----*---)

RTN1(28) 10 10.400 0.516 (----*---) RTN2(28) 10 10.600 0.516 (---*----) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.487 9.10 9.80 10.50

One-way ANOVA: RDC (28), RTN1(28)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 12.800 12.800 57.60 0.000 Error 18 4.000 0.222

Total 19 16.800

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- RDC (28) 10 8.800 0.422 (----*---)

RTN1(28) 10 10.400 0.516 (----*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.471 9.10 9.80 10.50

One-way ANOVA: RDC (28), RTN2(28)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 16.200 16.200 72.90 0.000 Error 18 4.000 0.222

Total 19 20.200

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- RDC (28) 10 8.800 0.422 (----*---)

RTN2(28) 10 10.600 0.516 (---*----) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.471 9.10 9.80 10.50

One-way ANOVA: RTN1(28), RTN2(28)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 0.200 0.200 0.75 0.398 Error 18 4.800 0.267

Total 19 5.000

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+--- RTN1(28) 10 10.400 0.516 (---*---)

RTN2(28) 10 10.600 0.516 (---*---) ---+---+---+--- Pooled StDev = 0.516 10.25 10.50 10.75

One-way ANOVA: RDC(56), RTN1(56), RTN2(56)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 2 32.467 16.233 118.46 0.000 Error 27 3.700 0.137

Total 29 36.167

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+---+- RDC(56) 10 8.700 0.483 (--*--)

RTN1(56) 10 10.800 0.422 (--*--) RTN2(56) 10 11.000 0.000 (--*---) ---+---+---+---+- Pooled StDev = 0.370 8.80 9.60 10.40 11.20

* NOTE * All values in column are identical.

One-way ANOVA: RDC(56), RTN1(56)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 22.050 22.050 107.27 0.000 Error 18 3.700 0.206

Total 19 25.750

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+---+

RDC(56) 10 8.700 0.483 (---*---)

RTN1(56) 10 10.800 0.422 (---*---) ---+---+---+---+

Pooled StDev = 0.453 8.80 9.60 10.40 11.20

One-way ANOVA: RDC(56), RTN2(56)

Analysis of Variance

Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 26.450 26.450 226.71 0.000 Error 18 2.100 0.117

Total 19 28.550

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev ---+---+---+---+- RDC(56) 10 8.700 0.483 (--*--)

RTN2(56) 10 11.000 0.000 (-*--) ---+---+---+---+- Pooled StDev = 0.342 8.80 9.60 10.40 11.20

* NOTE * All values in column are identical.

Một phần của tài liệu Ảnh hưởng của bổ sung dầu hạt lanh vào khẩu phần đến năng suất và chất lượng chứng gà ISA SHAVER (Trang 73 - 87)

Tải bản đầy đủ (PDF)

(87 trang)