PISA 20124
Mã quyển đề Cụm câu hỏi
B1 PM5 PS3 PM6A PS2 B2 PS3 PR3 PM7A PR2 B3 PR3 PM6A PS1 PM3 B4 PM6A PM7A PR1 PM4 B5 PM7A PS1 PM1 PM5 B6 PM1 PM2 PR2 PM6A B7 PM2 PS2 PM3 PM7A B8 PS2 PR2 PM4 PS1 B9 PR2 PM3 PM5 PR1 B10 PM3 PM4 PS3 PM1 B11 PM4 PM5 PR3 PM2 B12 PS1 PR1 PM2 PS3 B13 PR1 PM1 PS2 PR3 Chú thích:
B = Booklet. Ví dụ: Quyển đề số 1 = Booklet 1 (B1) PM: Paper Maths = Đề thi của lĩnh vực Toán học PR: Paper Reading = Đề thi của lĩnh vực Đọc hiểu PS: Paper Science = Đề thi của lĩnh vực Khoa học
4
92
PHỤ LỤC 3. Các biểu đồ
Biểu đồ 1. Xếp hạng kết quả PISA 2012 ở lĩnh vực toán học5
5 PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014) Student
Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. tr.47
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Peru Colombia Jordan Tunisia Albania Uruguay Mexico Chile Kazakhstan Bulgaria Romania Serbia Israel Hungary Lithuania LB Nga Tây Ban Nha Bồ Đào Nha Luxembourg Iceland Pháp Đan Mạch Ireland Australia Việt Nam Bỉ Ba Lan Estonia Thụy Sĩ Nhật Bản Hàn Quốc Hồng Kông TQ Thượng Hải TQ Việt Nam
93
Biểu đồ 2. Xếp hạng kết quả PISA 2012 ở lĩnh vực đọc hiểu6
6 PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014) Student
Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. tr.177
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Peru Kazakhstan Indonesia Malaysia Colombia Brazil Montenegro Bulgaria Chile Costa Rica Serbia CH Slovak LB Nga Hy Lạp Thụy Điển Croatia Hungary Luxembourg Latvia Áo Đan Mạch VQ Anh Pháp Đức Thụy Sĩ Hà Lan Australia Liechtenstein Ireland Canada Hàn Quốc Singapore Thượng Hải TQ Việt Nam
94
PHỤ LỤC 4. Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Tài liệu trong nƣớc
1.1. Đào Thị Liễu (2013), Bồi dưỡng năng lực tốn học hóa tình huống thực
tiễn cho học sinh thông qua dạy học nội dung xác suất thống kê tại trường THPT, Luận văn Thạc sĩ Khoa học Giáo dục, Viện Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam.
1.2. NSƯT Trần Dư Sinh (2012), Đổi mới dạy và học Tốn ở bậc học phổ thơng,
http://ptth-hstar.thuathienhue.edu.vn/imgs/to_toan_ly_tin/c-
fakepathdoi-moi-day-va-hoc-toan-o-pho-thong.pdf, ngày cập nhật
4.12.2015.
1.3. Tăng Hồng Dương (2011), Tiếp cận đánh giá PISA bằng phương pháp
giải quyết vấn đề qua dạy học các bài toán thực tiễn phần khối đa diện và khối trịn xoay (Hình học khơng gian lớp 12 - Ban cơ bản, Luận văn
Thạc sĩ ngành Lý luận và phương pháp dạy học, Đại học Giáo dục. 1.4. Nguyễn Thị Phương Hoa, Vũ Thị Kim Chi, Nguyễn Thùy Linh (2009),
Chương trình đánh giá học sinh quốc tế (PISA) (Mục đích, tiến trình thực hiện, các kết quả chính),
http://js.vnu.edu.vn/nn_4_09/b.2.pdf
1.5. Lê Thị Mỹ Hà (2012), Xây dựng quy trình đánh giá KQHT của HS trung học, Luận án Tiến sĩ Quản lý giáo dục, Đại học Giáo dục.
1.6. Hoàng Đức Nhuận và PGS PTS Lê Đức Phúc (1995), Cơ sở lý luận của
việc đánh giá chất lượng học tập của học sinh phổ thơng, Chương trình
95
1.7. Lê Văn Hà (2011), Đánh giá khả năng học tập theo chương trình sách giáo khoa hiện hành của học sinh Trung học cơ sở, Tạp chí Khoa học,
Trường Đại học Hồng Đức (số 7).
1.8. Vũ Văn Cát (2008), Quy trình kiểm tra – đánh giá kết quả học tập của
học sinh trung học phổ thông, Luận văn Thạc sỹ nghành Lý luận và
phương pháp dạy học, Đại học Giáo dục.
1.9. Getinet Haile, Nguyễn Ngọc Anh (2008), Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến kết
quả HT ở Hoa Kỳ: Phân tích hồi quy điểm phân vị cho điểm kiểm tra,
http://www.depocen.org/vn/our-publication/articles/189-cac-yeu-to- anh-huong-den-ket-qua-hoc-tap-o-hoa-ky.html
1.10. Nguyễn Thị Minh Phương (2008). Ảnh hưởng của yếu tố ngoài nhà trường đến việc học tập của HS, Nghiên cứu Gia đình và Giới, (số 2 -
2008).
1.11. Bế Thị Điệp (2011). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến đến KQHT của HS trường Phổ thông Dân tộc Nội trú Tỉnh Cao Bằng. Viện Đảm bảo chất
lượng giáo dục, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
1.12. Lê Ngọc Hùng. (2013). Xã hội học. Nxb. Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. Tr. 274
1.13. Luật Giáo dục (2005), Điều 93.
1.14. Hồng Phê, Từ điển Tiếng Việt, Viện Ngơn ngữ học, tr. 114
1.15. Tổng Cục thống kê. Cấu trúc tuổi - giới tính và tình trạng hơn nhân của dân số Việt Nam, tr.80
1.16. Phan Ngọc Liên. Hội nhập quốc tế về giáo dục trong xu thế toàn cầu hóa, tr.1
96
2. Tài liệu trên thế giới
2.1. Richard J.Stiggins (1996), Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, Edition 2.
2.2. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind,
http://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf
2.3. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
2.4. Bloom, Benjamin S (1996), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
2.5. Marks GN (2008), Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries.
Oxford Review of Education
2.6. H.Y. Atar, Burcu ATAR (2012), Examining the Effects of Turkish Education Reform on Students’ TIMSS 2007 Science Achievements, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1002867.pdf, ngày cập nhật 4.12.2015.
2.7. Ali Reza Kiamanesh (2004), Factors Affecting Iranian Student’s Achievement in Mathematics, Teacher Training University, Iran.
2.8. Farooq, M.S. Chaudhry, A.H. Shafique, M. & Berhan, G. (2011),
Factors effecting student’s quality of academic performance a case of secondary school level, Journal of quality and technology management.
2.9. Memon, G.R. Joubish, M.F. & Khurram, M.A. (2010), Impact of parental socio-economic status on student’s educational achievements and secondary schools of district Malir, Karachi.
2.10. Femi Ogunshola, A.M. Adewale (2012), The Effects of Parental Socio-
Economic Status on Academic Performance of Students in Selected Schools in Edu Lga of Kwara State Nigeria, International Journal of
97
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences July 2012, Vol. 2, No. 7
2.11. Krishna Prasad Pangeni (2013). Factors determining educational quality: Student mathematics achievement in Nepal.
2.12. Leibowitz, Arleen, 1974. Home Investments in Children, Journal of
Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 2, Part 2: Marriage, Family Human Capital, and Fertility, 111-131
2.13. Milne AM, Myers DE, Rosenthal AS, Ginsburg A (1986), Single parents, working mothers, and the educational achievement of school children, Sociology of Education
2.14. Xi-zhi Wu and Mao-zai Tian (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Family Background Factors on Mathematics Achievements Using Quantile Regression. Center for Applied Statistics, School of
Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
2.15. Shin Jongho, Lee Hyunjoo and Kim Yongnam. Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: International Comparisons of PISA 2003 in Korea, Japan and Finland (2006), Seoul National University.
2.16. David W. Grissmer, Ann Flanagan, Jennifer H. Kawata, Stephanie Williamson, (2000), Improving Student Achievement What State NAEP
Test Scores Tell Us
2.17. Pong, S.-L. (1997). Family Structure, School Context, and Eighth- Grade Math and Reading Achievement. Journal of Marriage and the
Family, 59(3), 734-746.
2.18. Pong, S.-L. (1998). The school compositional effect of single parenthood on 10th-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 71(1),
98
2.19. Pekka Kupari & Kari Nissinen. Background factors behind mathematics achievement in Finnish education context: Explanatory models based on TIMSS 1999 and TIMSS 2011 data, University of
Jyväskylä, Finland.
2.20. Anass Bayaga and Newman Wadesango (2014), Analysis of Students’ Attitudes on Mathematics Achievement-Factor Structure Approach,
University of Fort Hare, South Africa
2.21. Harb, N., & El-Shaarawi, A. (2006), Factors affecting student performance, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 13621,
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13621/
2.22. Reid, J.M. (1995), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom, Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
2.23. Felder, Richard. How Students Learn: Adapting Teaching Styles to Learning Styles, Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference
2.24. brahim Demir, Serpil Klỗ, Özer Depren. Factors affecting Turkish students’ achievement in mathematics (2009). Yıldız Technical
University
2.25. Aedín Doris, Donal O’Neill and Olive Sweetman. Gender, Single-Sex Schooling and Maths Achievement (2012). Institute for the Study of Labor.
2.26. Lingling Ma; Kelly D. Bradley, The Development of Mathematics Achievement in Secondary School Individual Differences and School Effects,
http://www.uky.edu/~kdbrad2/The%20Development%20of%20Math% 20Achievement.pdf
2.27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014)
99
2.28. TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. TIMSS International Study Center. p. 29. Cập nhật ngày 3/5/2014.
2.29. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Cập nhật ngày 3/52014.
2.30. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Cập nhật ngày 3/52014.
2.31. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/home/pdf/TP_About.pdf
2.32. An Overview of PIRLS 2006: Design, Results and Subsequent Analysis, Oliver Neuschmidt, IEA Data Processing and Research Center Ina V.S.
Mullis and Michael O. Martin, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston College,
2.33. http://www.iaea2008.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/digitalA
2.34. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014) Student Performance in Mathematics,
Reading and Science. pg.26
2.35. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework, pg.15
2.36. Astone, N.M. and McLanahan, S. (1991). Family structure, parental
practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review
2.37. Mohammadi et al. (2011), Effect of e-learning on language learning,
Procedia Computer Science.
2.38. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarifi cation. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defi ning and selecting key competences (pp. 45– 65). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
2.39. http://www.oxfordlearning.com/2010/05/05/what-does-math-literacy- mean/
2.40. Alan H. Schoenfeld (2007). Assessing Mathematical Proficiency.
100
2.41. http://www.intelligencetest.com/questions/mathematical.htm 2.42. http://www.intelligencetest.com/index.htm
2.43. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework,pg.25 2.44. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework, pg.38
2.45. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014) Student Performance in Mathematics,
Reading and Science. pg.37
2.46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013)
PISA 2012 Results (Volume II): Excellence through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed.
2.47. Greenberg, M., Weissberg, R., O Brien, M., Zins, J., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth
development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning.
2.48. Walberg, H.J. & Anderson, G.J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419
2.49. Walberg, H.J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. Farley & N.J. Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and
education: the state of the union (pp. 81–108). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
2.50. DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J. & Stephen, N. E. (2005). A model of academic enablers and mathematics achievement in the elementary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 379-397.
2.51. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd
ed.). New York: McGrawHill.
2.52. David De Vaus (2001), Surveys In Social Research (Social Research
101
2.53. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014)
PISA 2012 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do.
2.54. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013),
PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework, pg.166
2.55. PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V), pg. 135 2.56. Adekeyi, A. (2002). Teaching social studies in Nigeria Colleges. Ile –
Ife: University Press.
2.57. Ho Sui-Chu, E., & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth- grade achievement. Sociology of Education,
69(2), 126-141. EJ533315.
2.58. Niebuhr, K. (1995). The effect of motivation on the relationship of school climate, family environment, and student characteristics to academic achievement (Report No. EA 027467). East Lansing, MI:
National center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393202)
2.59. Marcon, R. A., (1999). Demographic and educational influences on academic motivation, competence, and achievement in minority urban students (Report No. UD032902). East Lansing, MI: National center for
Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430061)
2.60. Astone, N. and McLanahan, S. (1991), Family structure, parental practices and high school completion, American Sociological Review,
56(3), 309-320.
2.61. Pong, S. Dronkers, J. Hampden-Thompson, J. (1994) Family policies and children‟s school achievement in single-versus two-parent families, Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 681-699.
102
2.62. Krein, S. F. and Beller, A. (1988) Educational attainment of children from single-parent families: differences by exposure, gender, and race,
Demography, 25(2), 221-234.
2.63. Milne AM, Myers DE, Rosenthal AS, Ginsburg A. Single parents, working mothers, and the educational achievement of school children. Sociology of Education. 1986; 59:125–39.
2.64. Riala, K. Isohanni, I. Jokelainen, J. Jones, P. e Isohanni, M. (2003), The
relationship between childhood family background and educational performance, with special reference to single-parent families: a longitudinal study, Social Psychology of Education 6, 349-365.
2.65. Bernstein, B. (1971). Education cannot compensate for society. School
and Society: A sociological reader. Cambridge: Open University), 61-
66
2.66. Lindholm, Kathryn J. and Zierlein Aclan (1991), Bilingual Proficiency as a Bridge to Academic Achievement: Results from Bilingual/Immersion Programs, Journal of Education 172:99-113
2.67. International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO 08),
Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables, Volumn 1,
pg.66 - 83
2.68. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014)
PISA 2012 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do.
2.69. Wang, M. F., & Bakken, L. L. (2003). An academic writing needs assessment of clinical investigators who have English as their second language. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice
Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education, Columbus, OH.
103
2.70. PISA 2012 Results (Volume II): Excellence through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed, pg.66
2.71. Atkinson, John W.; and Feather, N. T. (editors) (1966), A Theory of
Achievement Motivation. New York: Wiley. Alokan
2.72. Alokan et al (2013). The influence of parent’s educational background
and study facilites on academic performance among secondary school students (2013). Ozean Journal of Social Sciences 6(2).
2.73. PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity (Volume II), Giving every student the chance to succeed. pg.1134
2.74. Shapiro, D., & Tambashe, B. O. (2001), Gender, poverty, family structure, and investments in children’s education in Kinshasa, Congo.
Economics of Education Review, 20(4), 359-375.
2.75. Gina A. N. Chowa et al. (2012), The Impact of Household Possessions
on Youth’s Academic Achievement in the Ghana YouthSave Experiment.
2.76. PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity (Volume II), Giving
every student the chance to succeed. tr.95
2.77. PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity (Volume II), Giving
every student the chance to succeed. tr.98
2.78. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014) Student Performance in Mathematics,
Reading and Science. pg.47
2.79. PISA 2012 Results (Volume II): Excellence through Equity: Giving
Every Student the Chance to Succeed, pg.64
http://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=VNM&tr eshold=10&topic=PI