TÀI LIEU THAM KHAO
40. Nguyén Minh Tién (2015), Stress la gi?,
6.2. Khi ngụ đên hoặc thảo luận về van de học tập định hướng nghe
con với con hoặc với người khác, anh/chị có các biểu hiện về tâm lý nào sau
day?
Bồn chon, cam thay bat an khi nghỉ hoặc
nói ve việc học tập định hướng nghề
nghĩ
Lo lăng hoặc sợ hãi khi nghĩ hoặc nói Về việc học tập định hướng nghề nghiệp của
Cam thay that vong va đau khô khi nghĩ
hoặc nhắc đến việc học tập định hướng
nghẻ nghiệp của con
Khó tập trung, chú ý Trí nhớ giám sút
Buôn bã, phiên muộn về việc học tập định hưởng nghé nghiệp cúa con
Kho chịu trước những tiếng động hoặc
Suy nghĩ chậm chạp và thiêu khả năng
đưa ra quyết định
Né tránh nhắc đến hoặc thảo luận về việc định hướng nghề nghỉ D của con..
Trân trọng cảm ơn sự giúp đỡ của anh/chị!
nghiệp của
HNK | TT | TX | LL
1 | De tức giận, khó kiếm soát cảm xúc | | | `
Phu lục 2: Bang xử lý xuất từ SPSS
*M6 tả khách thé
Cao hoc
Cao dang - Dai hoc
Tot nghiep THTPT
Chua tot nghiep THTPT Total
Thunhap
Cumulative
Frequency Valid Percent Percent
3-5 trieu 10 8.8 8.8 12.4
§ - 10 trieu 28 24.8 24.8 37.2
Tren 20 triau Total
GTcon
Cumulative Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent Valid Nam
Nu
HLcon
Cumulative
Frequency Percent | Valid Percen Percent
Gioi Kha
Trung binh Yeu
Total
Di lam sau tot nghiep THPT
Hoc trung tap
Hoc dai hec
Total
Muc do quan tam
Luon luon
Thuong xuyen
Thinh thoang
It khi
Total
*Mức độ biéu hiện căng thăng chung
Mucdocangthang
Khong bao gio Hau nhụ khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Total
Crosstab
% within GTchame Hau nhukhong Count
% within GTchame Count
% within GTchame Thuong xuyen Count
% within GTchame
Count
% within GTchame
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio . Linear-by-Linear Association \ N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .41.
Crosstab
Chua tot
nghiep THTPT Mucdocangt Khong bao gio Count
% within HVchame
% within HVchame
3% within HVchame Thuong xuyen Count
% within HVchame Count
% within HVchame
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio ì Linear-by-Linear Association \ N of Valid Cases
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04.
Crosstab
Thunhap
10-20 | Tren 20 trieu tneu Mucdocangt Khong bao gio Count
hang % within
Thunhap
4 10 28 48 23 113
100.0%] 100.0%] 100.0% 100.0%] 100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio j Linear-by-Linear Association ì N of Valid Cases
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04.
Crosstab
Am hieu ve nganh nghe
bung | Krona |
Khong bao gio Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh
nghe
Hau nhukhong Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh
nghe
Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
% within Am hieu ve nganh
nghe
Crosstab
Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Khong bao gio Count 12
% within Am hieu ve nh
= 27.3%
Count 10 6
% within Am hieu ve nh
= 13.6%
nghe
Thuong xuyen Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh
nghe
Count
% within Am hieu va nganh nghe
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value sided)
expected count is .39.
Crosstab
Count
% within Muc do quan
tam
Thuong xuyen Count
% within Muc do quan
tam
Count
% within Muc do quan
tam
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .140 Likelihood Ratio 372 Linear-by-Linear Association \ 810) N of Valid Cases
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .11.
Crosstab
% within GTcon
% within GTcon Count
% within GTcon Thuong xuyen Count
% within GTcon Count
% within GTcon
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .45.
Mucdocangt Khong bao
hang gio
% within HLcon
% within HLcon
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 9 cells (56.39%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .07.
Mucdocangtha Khong bao Count
ng 3 within
Dudinh_con Count
% within
Count
% within
Dudinh con
oT
Đi lam
sau tot
nghiep
THPT
Hoc so Hoc cao | Hoc dai
Total
53.8%
Count
% within
Count
% within
TÔ 100.0%] 100.0% 100.0%
Dudinh con
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio . Linear-by-Linear Association ‘ N of Valid Cases
a. 10 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .06.
*Van dé gây căng thăng (stress) cho cha me học sinh lớp 12 về việc học tập định hướng nghề nghiệp của con
Thao luan ve nghe nghiep
Cumulative Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
Valid Khong
Co 24.8 100.0
z 100.0 100.0 Bat dong quan diem
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent Valid Khong
Co 100.0)
100.0 100.0 Phuong phap hoc tap
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Khong 85 75.2 75.2 75.2
Co 28 24.8 24.8 100.0
é 113 100.0 100.0 Trang trai hoc phi
Cumulative Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
* Biêu hiện căng thăng chung
Muc do bieu hien cang thang
Cumulative Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
60 53.1 531
Thinh thoang 425 95.6
Thuong xuyen ; 44
Total
*Biéu hiện căng thăng về mặt co thể
Nhip tho nhanh va sau hon
Cumulative Frequency
49 . Hau nhu khong 27
Khong bao gio
Thinh thoang 24 Thuong xuyen
Luon luon Total
Tim dap nhanh va hoi hop
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
44 38.9 38.9) .
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Ra nhieu mo hoi
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
Khong bao qio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen
Luon luon Total
Khong bao gio Hau nhụ khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Total
Khong bao gio Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Net mat cang thang, cu chỉ cung nhac
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent Percent
42 ‘ 2 37.2 Valid Khong bao gio 47.
Hau nhu khong 24
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Cumulalive
Percent
Valid Khong bao gio
Hau nhụ khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Tolal
*So sánh biéu hiện căng thăng về mặt cơ thê trên các phương điện
Crosstab
Mus do bieu hiền cothe Khong bao gio Count
% within GTchame Hau nhu khong = Count
% within GTchame Thinh thoang Count
% within GTchame
Count 46 113
% within GTchame 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 2.04
Crosstab
HVchame
Chua tot
Cao đang - | Tot nghiep nghiep
Cao Dai hos THTPT THTPT
Mục do bieu Khong bao
hien co the Hải
40.0% 29.7% 42.9%
Count 17
% within
40.0% 5% 34.7%
HVchame
% within
HVchame
Count
% within
100.0%
HVchame
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. {2- Value sided)
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .22
Crosstab
Thunhap
10 - 20 Tren 20
; trieu trieu Total
% within
39.3%) 31.2% 35.4%
Thunhap Hau nhụ
Khô +. within
31.2% 43.5% 37.2%
Thunhap
Count
% within
14.3% 31.2% 21.7% 23.0%
Thunhap
Count
% within ; aie Thunhap
Count
% within
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%. 100.0%
Thunhap
Chi-Square Tests
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 11 cells (55.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18.
Crosstab
Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Khong bao gio Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Thinh thoang Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Thuong xuyen Count
% within Am hieu ve
nganh nghe
Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
.761
Likelihood Ratio 1.164 3 -762 Pearson Chi-Square 1.169" 3
Linear-by-Linear Association 015 1 -902
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio › Linear-by-Linear Association { N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.95
a
| Mu@dogmaem | do quan tam
Thuong Thinh
Luon luo xuyen thoang Total
Count 12
% within Muc
35.4%
đo quan tam
Count 4
% within Muc
37.2%) đo quan tam
Count 26
% within Muc
59 23.0%
đo quan tam
2
Count 5
3% within Mục đo quan tam
Count
% within Mục đo quan tam
Chi-Square Tests
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .53.
Crosstab
Muc do bieu hiencothe Khong bao gio Count
% within GTcon
> -
Haunhu khong Count
% within GTcon Thinh thoang Count
% within GTcon Thuong xuyen Count
% within GTcon Count
œ„
S 2 N on 5 %
% within GTcon
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value sided)
Crosstab
Muc do bieu Khong bao Count
hien co the gio
% within HLcon
Count
% within HLcon Count
% within HLcon
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
HLcon
14 14
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .35
Crosstab
Mục do Count
Di lam sau tot nghiep
THPT
Hos cao Hoc dai
dang hoc
7 5 26
113)
100.0%
biau hien gio % within
co the Dudinh_co
n
Thinh thoang Count
% within
Dudinh_co
n
Count
% within
Dudinh_co
n
Count
% within
Dudinh_co
n
expected counl is 31.
*Biêu hiện ve mat tâm lý
Statistics
Valid
Khong bao gio Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang
21 18.6
31.0
18.6 410
Luon luon Total
Khong bao gio Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhụ khong Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Cam thay that vong va dau kho
46.9
30 26.5
16 14.2 12 10.6 2 1.8
26.5 14.2
10.6
1.8
Cumulalive
Percent
Cam thay that vong va dau kho
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percen Percent Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang
Thuong xuyen
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Buon ba, phien muon
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Total
nơ Cumulalive
Valid Khong bao gic 9.6 49.6 49.6 Hau nhụ khong 19 16.8 16.8 66.4)
Thinh thoang 27 23.9 23.9 90.3 Thuong xuyen 9 8.0 8.0 98.2 Luon luon 2 1.8 1.8 100.0
Ne tranh nhac hoac thao luan
Cumulative
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percen Percent Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang
Thuong xuyen
Total
Khong bao gio
Hau nhu khong
Thinh thoang Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Hieu qua cong viec
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Hau nhu khong
Thuong xuyen Luon luon
Total
Crosstab
GTchame
Muc do bieu hientamly Khongbaogio = Caunt
% within GTchame Hau nhu khong = Count
% within GTchame Thinh thoang Count
% within GTchame Thuong xuyen Count
% within GTchame Count
% within GTchame
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value sided)
expected count is 1.22.
Crosstab
Muc dobieu Khongbao Count
hien tamly gio % within HVchama
Count
% within HVchame
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value sided)
{2-
Pearson Chi-Square . 585 Likelihood Ratio \ .600 Linear-by-Linear Association . 662
N of Valid Cases
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .13.
% within Thunhap Count
% within Thunhap Count
% within Thunhap Count
% withinThunhap số
Count
% within Thunhap
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2
Value sided)
71 Pearson Chi:Square . 0 Likelihood Ratio F 052 Linear-by-Linear Association l ,200
N of Valid Cases
a. 11 cells (55.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .11.
Crosstab
Am hieu ve nganh nghe
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe Thuong xuyen Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Count
% within Am hieu ve nganh nghe
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio i Linear-by-Linear Association .
N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.17.
Crosstab
Muc do quan tam
Total Thuong Thinh
Luon luon xuyen thoang
Muc do bleu Khong bao gio Count
hien tam ly % within Muc
quan tam
Count
% within Muc do quan tam
% within Muc do quan tam
% within Muc do quan tam
Count
% within Muc do quan tam
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. {2-
Value sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .860 Likelihood Ratio .809 Linear-by-Linear Association . 539 N of Valid Cases
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .32.
Crosstab
Muc do bieu hientamly Khong bao gio Count
% within GTcon Hau nhu khong Count
% within GTcon
% within GTcon Thuong xuyen Count
% within GTcon Count
% within GTcon
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. {2- sided)
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected counl is 1.35
Count
% within HLcon
Count
% within HLcon Count
% within HLcon
Count
% within HLcon
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Pearson Chi-Square 17.263" 9 .045
Likelihood Ratio 17.002 9 .049
N of Valid Cases
a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .21.
Crosstab
Dilam
Sau tot
nghiep | Hoc trung | Hoc cao
THPT tap dang
Khong bao Count
% within
Dudinh_con Count
% within
Dudinh_con
Count
% within
Dudinh_con Count
% within
Dudinh_con m
Count
% within
Dudinh_con
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio
N of Valid Cases
Pearson Chi-Square 14.010"
Likelihood Ratio 14.574 9 .103
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.650 1 002
a. 11 cells (68.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .19.