1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tất cả

Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến quyết định chọn trường của sinh viên tại một số trường đại học ở việt nam

6 5 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

NGHltNCUULfUÎ NQ CAC NHAN TO ANH HUdNG DEN QUYET DINH CHON TRUfiTNG CUA SINH VIEN TAI MOT SO TRUdNG DAI HOC t VIET NAM") P H M m Lt NGUriN TM KIM UEN NGUYEN TRONG TUAN, TO HOAl THANG, HOANG HOU DUNG,[.]

NGHltNCUULfUI^NQ CAC NHAN TO ANH HUdNG DEN QUYET DINH CHON TRUfiTNG CUA SINH VIEN TAI MOT SO TRUdNG DAI HOC t VIET NAM") P H M m Lt NGUriN TM KIM UEN NGUYEN TRONG TUAN, TO HOAl THANG, HOANG HOU DUNG, N « i r i N NHU NGOC TnMBi Bai IMC NgurSii Tiit Thinh Eaall: lnAan@iitLedii.ni ^KinHtntTr , dtihX%^am J" f°/"'!^''*'9^^" 1"y^m chgn trudng cda sinh viin t,aog6m: I/An tuangvinhd m C ''""''''"•''''''^^^^^^^ Tir khda: Nhdn t6; quy& Snh chon trudng; sinh viin; tn/dng dgi hgc (Nhdn bdi ngdy 30/9/2016; Nhdn kit qui phdn blfn vd chlnh sda ngdy IS/I 0/2016; Duyit ddng ngdy 27/10/2016) l.eitvjnde Muc tiiu ciia bii vilt niy l i khio sit cic nhin td cd inh hudng lln quylt djnh chon trudng cCia sinh viln (SV) Vi|t Nam Cic nhin td l y cd t h i bi chi phdi bdi mdt md thufc chung da dupc trinh biy nhiJng nghiin cilu tuong tu cOa eic nudc, nhung cung cd ning tic ddng din quylt djnh chpn trudng ciia SV thudc vio bdi cinh vin hda, kinh t l v i chinh tri ciia mdi nudc thim chi mdi loai hinh trudng (cdng hay tu), v i mdi nginh khic Tuy da cd mdt sd nghien cilii v l d l tii niy cic tic gii ngudi Vilt thUc hiin vdi SV Vilt Nam nhung cung ehi dCmg lai d quy md nhd Trong bii vilt niy, chiing tdi t i p tmng phan tich cic nhin td inh hudng din vile chpn trudng cua SV mdt sd trudng dai hpc (BH)d Vilt Nam Thllt k l vi phifong phip nghiin ciifu 2.1 ThlA kivd gid thiit nghiin cuti Ciu hdi nghiin cdu dupc xiy dung dua trln gii thilt cho ring su lua chpn ciia SV chju tic ddng bdi mdt tip hpp die diem c i nhin cda SV ket hop vdi mdt loat inh hudng ngo?i t?i gdm hai nhdm: gia dinh vi nhi tn/dng Ci hai nhdm niy diu gdp phin vio viec hinh thinh nhufng ki vpng, mong dpi eOa SV vdi vile ttieo hpc DH l i dilu nit cue se quylt (Knh vile lUa chon trudng niy hay trudng khic ciia SV Muc tiiu ehung eiia nghiin ciiu niy l i kilm nghiem gii thilt nlu trln, nghia l i xie djnh nhufng nhan td tic ddng din quylt * n h chpn tn/dng cua SV v i qua dd tang cudng hilu bilt ciia chiing ta ve qui trinh quylt dinh niy LBanvilidHlKthvC hUn: Trung t i m NghiSn cOU v4 O i n h wi oiio dMC BH Tnidng BH Nguyen Tit Thinh Caquon rdll/vtTn^ng BH Nguy*nTJtTh4nh.A(dsrfi«fii;20Idi vdi If cd thi gam diu tuvio kinh niy d l diu tu vio kinh khic "vi tuong lai ein nhilu chuyen gia vl nginh hoc niy", mang lai hilu qui nhilu hon Tuy viy, eung d n luu y ring cd Sd chlnh lich rd (nam 46,67%, nd 3545%); 2/ Bii truyin hinh khdng phii li kinh thdng tin duoc ua Chpn nginh vi If lim dep Idng gia dinh (nam 16,30%, chudng HS tim hHu vl tn/dng, nhung nd cd thi inh nd 23,92%) Trong li chpn nginh, HS cd xult thin hudng mdt cich giin tilp thdng qua tao In tuong vl ndng thdn vi thinh thj cung khdng ed khic biet ding danh ding, vi danh tiing la nhin td rlt quan trong kl ngo?i trd li ndi nghiip gia dinh (ndng thdn 26% quylt (Jnh chpn tn/dng cua SV Ngudi hoc xem danh vi thinh thj 13,79%) Dilu niy cdng d l giii thich vi phin tllng cua tn/dng nhu mdt diu hilu bio chdng cho chit lupng vi CO hdi tim vi|c lim tuong lai Idn cic gia dinh ndng thdn sinh sdng blng ndng nghiip, Bilm diu vio cao cdng li mdt nhin td tao In luc SV nginh ndng nghi|p miu khio sit eua chung tdi chi cd 20 em trln tdng sd 823 Tuy viy, Ithi xemtupng vl uy tin vi chit lupng dio tao Cd rlt ft SV dUa xlt miu dai diln, ed ba li chpn nginh cho thiy si; vio thinh tfch nghiin cdu khoa hpc cua trudng d l dinh khic bi|t gida SV xult thin td ndng thdn vi thinh thj, gii vl danh tilna mic du diy li thudc chd ylu vl dd li: 1/ Nginh hpc dupe xa hdi n l (ndng thdn danh tiing trln pham vi qude tl Be xiy dung uy tin, danh tiing cua trudng, d n cd 27%, thinh thj 38%); 2/ Nginh hpc niy de kilm vile lim (ndng thdn 58%, thinh thj 46%); 3/ Ndi nghi|p gia dinh nhdng hoat ddng quing bi khic nhin manh vio nhdng (ndng thdn 8%, thinh thj 14%) Ding chu y li tl II chpn lAi dilm cd duoc nhd CO chi linh hoat ching han nhdng If "vi khdng cd lua chpn nio khic" cao vi chlnh eil dch vi chuong trinh dio tao gin v« thi gidi vile lim, mdi quan he vdi cic doanh nghiip, cic hoat ddng lech ding kl gida ndng thdn 19% vi thinh thj 9% thuc jp, dc hinh thde sinh hoat vin hda phong phd, SV nhdm nginh KTTC chpn nginh vi lido nginh va nhan manh nhdng thinh cdng eua cuu SV Trudng tu niy dang "hot", luc nhdm nganh KHXH nhin cin quing bi rdng vl dpi ngd GV cua ho, khdng ehi vl vin chpn nginh vi nginh niy "dupe su n l eua bing cap, mi li nhdng tin tudi ed uy tin chuyin xa hdi", cdn SV nginh KHKT chon nginh chu ylu vi If nginh, thdng qua d c hoat ddng phuc vu loifchcdng "luong cao" Dilu djc bilt li cd mdt su nhit quin dong, ching han tniyln bi tri thdc vi dem nhdng kiln ding kl gida miu toin thi vi miu dai di|n d diy Lf thue chuyin nudn ip dung vio thUc tl "chpn nginh vi y nghia cua nghi nghi|p" cao nhit Khic bilt gida nam vi ndtrong li chon nginh di ddi vdi SV nhdm nginh KHXH, vi thip nhit ddi vdi SV cung d p chdng cd d l cung cd thim mdt quan sit phd nhdm nginh KTTC biln xua nay: nam thien vl If tri vi nd chju inh hudng t6 m-THlm ttian'i Q N«fl£N ciiu Lf LUiN cda gia dinh nhilu hon Tuy viy, li ndi bat nhit ddi vdi d nam v i nd liln quan din y l u td tai ehinh v i sd thfch d nhin Dilu cd nghia l i , chien lupc truyin thdng cin phii dua dupe nhiing thdng dilp khac vio die diem cua nginh Cic nginh KHXH d n nhin manh hon y nghia eua nghi va su n l trpng eua x i hdi, luc d c nginh ki thuit d n nhan manh vao nhu clu cua x i hdi hien tai v i tuong lai ddi vdi nginh niy Mac du tiln hanh trln mdt sd lupng miu tuong ddi Idn v i da dang v l loai hinh trudng, v l ^ a bin trudng, v l cic nginh dio tao, nhung nghiin cdu niy d i khdng bao him dupe mdt sd trudng va nginh die thu, vi du cie trudng quin dpi, edng an, hoac d c nginh nghi thuit bilu diln Vl t h i , nd ed t h i khdng phin inh dupc diy du bde tranh ehung v l If chpn trudng v i chpn nginh cda SV d n u d e [7] Crampton, W J, Walstrom, K A., & Schambach, T P., (2006), Factors Influencing Major Selection By Ce)llege Of Business Students Issues in Information Systems, 7(1), 226-230 [8] Navratilovi, T, (2013), Analysis and comparison of factors influencing university choice Journal of Competitiveness, 5(3) [9] Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) ,(2009) Year 12 Student Choices: A Survey On Factors Influencing Year 12 Decision-Making On Post-School Destination, Choice Of University And Preferred Subject [10] Trln Vin Quy v i Cao Hio Thi, (2010); Cdcyiu td dnh hudng den quyit djnh chgn dgi hoc cOa hgc sinh phothdng trung hgc Tap chf Phit triln Khoa hpe v i Cdng nghi, Sd 15, thing 12 nim 2010 [11] Luu Ngpc Lilm, (2011), Xdc dinh cdc nhdn t6 TAIUCUTHAMKHAO [1] MaeCallum RC, Widaman KF., Sample Size in dnh hudng din quyit dinh chgn trudng hgc cua sinh viin Dgi hgc Lgc Hdng, Thu viln Oai hpc Lac Hdng Factor Analysis Psychological Me^ods 7999;.4:84-99 [12] Nguyin Phuong Toin, (201 l),)f/ido sdt c(»cylu [2] Kallio, R E, (1995) Factors Influencing The rd tde d^ng din vlic chgn trudng cCia hgc sinh Idp 12 tnjng College Choice Decisions Of Graduate Students Research hgcphS thdng trin dja bdn tinh Tiin Giang, Luin vin thac in Higher Education, 36( 1), 109-124 [31 Chapman DW.y4 Mode/OfStu(/entCo/tegeChoicc, si bio v | tai Viln Dim bio Chit luong, 0?i hpc Qude gia Journal of Higher Education 1981; 52:490-505 Hi Ndi [4] Pimpa, N., (2004), The Relationship between Thai [13] Nguyin Thanh Phong, (2013), Yiu tdquyitdinh Students' Choices of International Education and Their chgn Trudng Bai hgc Tiin Giang cda hgc sinh trung hgc Families, International Education Journal, 5(3), 352-359 ph6 thdng trin dia bdn Tiin Giang [5] Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S, (1989), Applied [14] Nguyin Phi Yin, (2006), Hdnh vl chgn ngdnh thi Logistic Regression New York: Wiley Ogi hgc cda hgc sinh Idp 12, Khda luin tdt nghiip d?i hpc [6] Shannon G Washburn et al Factors Influencing Trudng Oai hpc An Giang College Choice of Agriculture Students College-Wide [15] Merrifield PR Factor analysis in educational Compared with Students Majoring in /Agricultural research Review of Research in Education 1974; 2:393Education 434 I IMPACT FACTORS TO THE DECISION OF STUDENTS' UNIVERSITIES CHOICES AT VIETNAM UNIVERSITIES Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Kim Lien, Nguyen Trong Tuan, To Hoai Thang, Hoang Huu Dung, Nguyen Nhu Ngo< Nguyen Tat Thanh University Emalk lypham®ntt.edu.vn Vietnl'*^TnITn'^^L°-""'T'''"'"'*^T'''°'''''^'''^^^^ iTL^innT, w ''''r'.°^P'^'°"' '*"""'' '"^ o^'hors presented researchfindingsand analysis of impact fac Twt uZXs ^1^? "'T'^ '"""""''''"""''''"'" "" universities;2/ Information channel to earn ^^•cleolsopmposedsomespecificrecommendationsforstudents'universitieschoicesinV-ietnam Keyv/onb: Faaors; universities choices; students; universities S.IONUHOCGIiUjDgG "'"""« ... l gida nam v i nd vile \ifa chpn kinh thdng tin Mdt vii ylu td cd khic bi|t chut it gida nam v i nd l i elm'' nang tuyIn smh (55,31% nam so vdi 59,57% nd); thdng tin td cUu SV (20,25% nam so vdi... inh hudng rlt khic ddi vdi HS Viet Nam sU khic bilt rd v l bdi cinh van hda tl I I nam nd tuong ddng, xult thin da phin l i ndng xa hdi v i kinh t l Vi|t Nam, cdn it nhdng nghien cihi thdn,... nhdm vio phCi hpp l i If chpn trudmg (34,75%) nhilu hon so nginh KHTN vdi nam (29,53%) Trong dd, nam mudn chpn trudng So sinh giira SV cic trudng cdng v i trudng tu, kit xa nhi, tim co hdi kilm

Ngày đăng: 23/11/2022, 16:06

Xem thêm:

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w