Hướng mở rộng đề tài:

Một phần của tài liệu Nghiên cứu mối quan hệ giữa tham nhũng và đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài trường hợp ở các quốc gia đông nam á (Trang 70 - 83)

6. Ý nghĩa thực tiễn của bài nghiên cứu:

5.4. Hướng mở rộng đề tài:

Nghiên cứu về tác động kinh tế của tham nhũng đối với đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài ở các quốc gia Đông Nam Á là một vấn đề mới và khá nhạy cảm. Trong tương lai khi những dữ liệu hoàn chỉnh và số kỳ nghiên cứu đủ lớn, hướng nghiên cứu tiếp tục được hoàn thiện và bổ sung khi được tăng cỡ mẫu. Ngoài ra, theo tham khảo một số bài nghiên cứu gần đây như bài nghiên cứu “Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin American” của Godinez và Liu (2014), không chỉ tham nhũng ở các quốc gia tiếp nhận đầu tư mà tham nhũng ở các quốc gia đầu tư cũng ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến dòng vốn đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài. Do đó, bài nghiên cứu sẽ tiếp tục hoàn thiện về mặt dữ liệu, kỳ quan sát và bổ sung việc cần phải xem xét đến sự chênh lệch tham nhũng giữa quốc gia đầu tư và quốc gia nhận đầu tư. Về phương pháp định lượng, trong bài nghiên cứu sử dụng biến giả shock nhằm kiểm soát cú sốc kinh tế thế giới 2008 có ý nghĩa thống kê. Để kiểm soát tốt hơn vấn đề gãy của dữ liệu, có thể mở rộng sử dụng các phương pháp kiểm soát điểm gãy (break structural).

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO

* Tiếng Việt:

1. CECODES, Mặt trận Tổ quốc Việt Nam và UNDP (2010), Chỉ số hiệu quả quản trị và hành chính công cấp tỉnh ở Việt Nam (PAPI) 2010, Chương trình Giảng dạy Kinh tế Fulbright, Niên khóa 2011 -2013.

2. Cổng thông tin điện tử chính phủ. http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/

* Tiếng Anh:

1. Aamir, M., Farhan, M., Ali, M., & Sharif, M. S. (2011). Market size effect on foreign direct investment: A Case of Malaysia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(7), 1002.

2. Al-Abdulrazag, B., & Bataineh, T. (2007). The causal relationship between foreign direct investment FDI and saving in Jordan and Error Correction Model.

International Management Review Journal, 3(4), 12.

3. Aliber, R. Z. (1970). Speculation in the flexible exchange. Kyklos, 23(2), 303-314.

4. Al-Sadig, A. (2009), The Effects of Corruption on FDI Inflows. Cato Journal, 29(2), 267-294.

5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data:

Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of

Economic Studies 58, 277-297.

6. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.

7. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320-46.

8. Besley, T., & McLaren, J. (1993). Taxes and Bribery: The Role of Wage Incentives. Economic Journal,103, 119-141.

9. Blomström, M. (1986). Foreign investment and productive efficiency: the case

of Mexico. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 97-110.

10.Braguinsky, S. (1996). Corruption and Schumpeterian Growth in Different Economic Environments. Contemporary Economic Policy, 14 (3), 14-25.

11.Buchanan, B. G., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2012). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 81-89.

12.Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European journal of political economy, 23(2), 397-415.

13.Caetano, J., & Caleiro, A. (2005). Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment: What kind of relationship is there? University of Évora, Economics Working Papers, No 18-2005.

14.Clarke, K. A. (2005). The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22(4), 341- 352.

15.Craigwell, R., & Wright, A. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment and Corruption in Developing Countries: Evidence from Linear and Non-linear Panel Granger Causality Tests. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2272-2283

16.Drabek, Z., & Payne, W. (1999). The Impact of Transparency on Foreign Direct Investment. Staff Working Paper ERAD-99-02, Geneva: World Trade Organization.

17. Drukker, D. M. (2003). Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. Stata Journal (3)2, 168-177.

18.Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19(1), 1-31.

19.Egger, P., & Winner, H. (2005). Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(4), 932-952. 20.Glossaries, O. E. C. D. (2008). Corruption a Glossary of International Standards

in Criminal Law.

21.Greene, W. (2000). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

22.Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (1998). Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty? IMF Working Paper, 98(76), 1-41.

23.Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment.

24.Henisz, W. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334-64. 25.Heritage Foundation. Index of economic freedom 2015.

(http://www.heritage.org/index/explore)

26.Houston, D. (2007). Can Corruption Ever Improve an Economy? Cato Journal, 27(3), 325-342.

27.Hsu, Y. H. (2007). Is Corruption a Grabbing Hand? A Panel Data Study of FDI.Graduate Institute of Political Economy, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, 1-18.

28.Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

29.Hymer, S. (1976) The International Operations of Nation Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. Cambridge, MLT Press.

30.Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587-616

31.Judge, W., McNatt, B., & Xu, W. (2011). The antecedents and effects of national

corruption: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business, 46, 93-103.

32. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of econometrics, 90(1), 1-44.

33.Ketkar, K., Murtuza, A., & Ketkar, S. (2005). Impact of Corruption of Foreign Direct Investment and Tax Revenues. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Financial Management, 17(3), 313-340.

34. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American economic review, 291-303.

35.Kwok, C., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 767- 785.

36.Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press Books.

37. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2003). How corruption affects persistent capital flows.

Economics of Governance, 4(3), 229-243.

38.Leff, N. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption.

American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 8-14.

39. Liargovas, P. G., & Skandalis, K. S. (2012). Foreign direct investment and trade

openness: The case of developing economies. Social indicators

research, 106(2), 323-331.

40. Lily, J., Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Thien Sang, L., & Asid, R. (2014). Exchange Rate Movement and Foreign Direct Investment in Asean Economies.

Economics Research International.

41. Liu, X., Parker, D., Vaidya, K., & Wei, Y. (2001). The impact of foreign direct investment on labour productivity in the Chinese electronics industry.

International business review, 10(4), 421-439.

42. Loree, D. W., & Guisinger, S. E. (1995). Policy and non-policy determinants of US equity foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 281-299.

43.MacDougall, G. D. A. (1960). The Benefits and Cost of Private Investment from Abroad: A theoretical Approach. Economic Record, 36, 395-409.

44.Markusen, J. R., & Venables, A. J. (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. European Economic Review, 43, 335-356.

45. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 681-712.

46.Meon, P., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244-259.

47.Pinto, P. B., & Zhu, B. (2008). Fortune or Evil? The Effects of Inward Foreign Direct Investment on Corruption. Saltzan Working Paper, 10.

48. Quazi, R. (2007). Economic Freedom and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 12(3), 329-344.

49. Quazi, R. M. (2014). Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia

and South Asia: An Econometric Study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(2), 231-242.

50.Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes,

consequences, and reform. Cambridge university press.

51.Roy, J. P., & Oliver, C. (2009). International joint venture partner selection: The role of the host-country legal environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 779-801.

52.Salahuddin, M. (2010). A Note on Causal Relationshio between FDI and Saving in Bangladesh. Theoretical andApplied Economics, 11(552), 53-62.

53. Salahuddin, M., Chani, M. I., & Shahbaz, M. (2010). A Note on Causal

Relationship between FDI and Savings in Bangladesh. Theoretical and Applied

Economics, 17(11), 53-62.

54. Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2002). Foreign direct investment in Vietnam: Impact

on the development of the manufacturing sector. The EADI 10th General Conference in Ljubljana.

55. Seim, T. (2010). FDI and openness: Differences in response across countries

line. Chr. Michelsen Institute.

56. Subasat, T., & Bellos, S. (2013). Corruption and foreign direct investment in latin america: A panel gravity model approach. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(4), 151.

57.Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope,

and cures. Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, 559-594.

58.Tang, S., Selvanathan, E. A., & Selvanathan, S. (2008). Foreign direct investment, dometic investment, and economic growth in China: A time series Analysis. The Wold Economy, 31(10), 1292-1309.

59.Tavares, J., & Larrain, F. B. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Decrease Corruption?.Cuadernos De Economia, 41, 217-230.

60. Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index. (http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview)

61.Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from

ten years of cross-national empirical research?. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.,10, 211-244.

62.Trindade, V. (2005). Thebigpush,industrializationandinternationaltrade: the role of exports. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 22-48.

63.UNCTAD (2006). World Investment Report 2006. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations, New York.

64.Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190-207.

65.Voyer, P., Beamish, P. (2004). The Effect of Corruption on Japanese Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3), 211-224.

66.Wei, S. (2000a). How Taxing Is Corruption on International Investors?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1-11.

67.WGI (2014). Worldwide Governance Indicators. (http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp)

68.Wheeler, D., & Mody, A. (1992). International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of US Firms. Journal of International Economics, 33, 57-76.

69.Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

70.World bank (2009). Deterring Corruption and Improving Governance in Road Construction and Maintenance, Washington, DC.

71. World bank. World Development Indicators.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator

72.Zhao, J., Kim, S., & Du, J. (2003). The Impact of Corruption and Transparency on Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis. Management International Review, 43(1), 41-62.

PHỤ LỤC

Phục lục 1: Thống kê mô tả

Phụ lục 5: Tự tương quan

Một phần của tài liệu Nghiên cứu mối quan hệ giữa tham nhũng và đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài trường hợp ở các quốc gia đông nam á (Trang 70 - 83)

Tải bản đầy đủ (PDF)

(83 trang)