0

sample cover letter spouse visa uk

The Ad Response - Resume Cover Letter

The Ad Response - Resume Cover Letter

Kỹ năng nói tiếng Anh

... your letter or for considering you as a candidate.The following sample closings will help you out in a variety of jobhuntingsituations, as will the many examples contained in the sample letters ... promised. So do.You ’ll find examples of this vital stepin virtually every sample letter in thisbook. Here are just a few:Samples of instructing.■I look forward to hearing from you.My address ... 6/27/03 9:21 AM Page 64 LETTER 5-33: ADVERTISING/MARKETING—SALARYBeginning with the creative use of the company’s motto, this writer weaves industry lingointo a strong cover letter that resulted...
  • 128
  • 653
  • 1
Tài liệu Cover Letter Format pdf

Tài liệu Cover Letter Format pdf

Kỹ năng nói tiếng Anh

... SalutationDear Mr./Ms. Last Name, (leave out if you don't have a contact) Body of Cover Letter The body of your cover letter lets the employer know what position you are applying for, why the employer ... brainstorming about why you are the person who best fulfills the employer's needs. Write Cover Letter FormatYour Contact Information Name Address Phone Number Email Address Date Employer ... Universities.Invited by Duke University President Terry Sanford to develop new directions and programs for the University's Office of Summer Educational Programs, first Director of Duke's "Pre-college...
  • 22
  • 954
  • 1
Check Your English Vocabulary for Living in the UK.pdf

Check Your English Vocabulary for Living in the UK.pdf

TOEFL - IELTS - TOEIC

... quiz. UK facts and figures111. True or false: The UK is a union of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland.2. Rearrange the letters in bold to make words:The full name of the UK ... relevantfor the job they are applying for). This should be accompanied by a (2) cover / covering letter (also called a letter of introduction). This should be typed rather than handwritten,and it ... largest ethnic minority in the UK? 13. Where would you find the single biggest concentration (45%) of ethnic minorities in the UK? 14. What percentage of people in the UK say that they have a religion?(a)...
  • 81
  • 2,924
  • 24
Better-Understanding-Sample.pdf

Better-Understanding-Sample.pdf

Kỹ năng đọc tiếng Anh

... soon as we secure the global network of the scientific enlightened institutes. The network will cover most of the nations and all the scientists will have international allegiance. It is time ... been under observation by the scientists of Planet Progress. These scientists were amazed to discover the great similarities between the two planets. They also understood the criticality of the...
  • 159
  • 1,182
  • 3
One-Sample Estimation Problems (TOÁN)

One-Sample Estimation Problems (TOÁN)

Toán học

... Chương 6: One -Sample Estimation Problems Giảng viên: Nguyễn Phương ContentsIntroduction Point Estimation Interval EstimationSingle Sample: Estimating the Mean Single Sample: Estimating ... n;à(0;1)/XNS nà;/2 /21P X z X zn n à ≤ ≤ + = −   Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Từ bảng trên, ta tính được: 21715.1176( )4.23532.0580( ... àà à= == == = − − − = − − − − + −= − − −∑ ∑∑ ∑∑ Single Sample: Estimating a Proportion  Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Ta có 1-α=0.99 Tra bảng ta được:Khoảng...
  • 36
  • 783
  • 0
Parliament & Election in UK.docx

Parliament & Election in UK.docx

Quản trị kinh doanh

... between UK s Parliament and Vietnam’s National AssemblyItemsThe UK s ParliamentVietnam’s National AssemblyBicameralUnicameralPowerThe Parliament of UK was the legislature of the UK. Over ... the United Kingdom. Made up of the House of Commons, House of Lords and the Queen (who is the UK& apos;s current hereditary monarch). The Monarch, the Queen, opens and closes Parliament every ... electors varies (for example, EU citizens who are not Commonwealth or Irish citizens cannot vote in UK Parliamentary elections), ballot papers are only issued after checking the marker in the Electoral...
  • 17
  • 641
  • 1
AC R Sample Task Type 1 Task

AC R Sample Task Type 1 Task

Kỹ năng viết tiếng Anh

... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts.  For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high­ yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries.  The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about one­fifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity.  The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest.  Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause.  In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land.  The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s.  To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides.  Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960­1985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent.  The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 1975­1984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies.  The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984.  A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes).  The removal of subsidies also stopped land­clearing and over­stocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion.  Farms began to diversify.  The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion. Sample task type 1 Questions 10 – 12 Choose the appropriate letters A, B, C or D. Write your answers in boxes 10­12 on your answer sheet. 10  ... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts.  For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high­ yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries.  The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about one­fifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity.  The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest.  Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause.  In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land.  The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s.  To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides.  Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960­1985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent.  The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 1975­1984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies.  The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984.  A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes).  The removal of subsidies also stopped land­clearing and over­stocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion.  Farms began to diversify.  The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion. ... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts.  For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high­ yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries.  The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about one­fifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity.  The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest.  Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause.  In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land.  The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s.  To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides.  Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960­1985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent.  The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 1975­1984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies.  The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984.  A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes).  The removal of subsidies also stopped land­clearing and over­stocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion.  Farms began to diversify.  The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion....
  • 3
  • 625
  • 0
AC R Sample Task Type 4 Task

AC R Sample Task Type 4 Task

Kỹ năng viết tiếng Anh

... Sample task type 4 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of dung beetles. The text preceding this extract gave some background facts about dung beetles, and went on to describe a decision to introduce non­native varieties to Australia.] ... matched with smaller (half this size), temperate-climate Spanish species. The former are slow to recover from the winter cold and produce only one or two generations of offspring from late spring...
  • 2
  • 672
  • 0

Xem thêm