1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Xử trí khi có hẹp mạch cảnh nặng phối hợp với hẹp mạch vành nặng

26 192 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 26
Dung lượng 4,44 MB

Nội dung

Management of Severe Combined Carotid & Coronary Artery Disease Mehdi H Shishehbor, DO, MPH, PhD Director, Endovascular Services Staff, Interventional cardiology and Vascular Medicine 69 Year Old with Unstable Angina and History of Common ILA Stent • CEA plus CABG: – Symptomatic carotid stenosis – Asymptomatic patients with internal carotid stenosis of 80% or more Stroke 12 10 Overall Unilateral 50-99% Bilateral 50-99% Any occlusion Carotid Stenosis & CABG Asymptomatic ≥ 80% stenosis Symptomatic Carotid stenting Hybrid Stent + CABG Staged Stent Followed by CABG CEA Combined CEA + CABG Staged CEA followed by CABG Staged CABG followed by CEA Risk of Death, Stroke, & MI with Combined (CEA + CABG) OR Staged (CEA  CABG) 30 Days Parameter Staged (CEA  CABG) Combined (CEA + CABG)  Any stroke MI    Death/stroke/MI  10 Incidence (%)  15 10 Incidence (%) Naylor AR et al Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:380-389 15 Staged-Carotid Stent Followed by CABG Death/ Stroke/MI 4/30 Mendiz Events/ Patients 13.3 Ziada 6/56 10.7 Versaci 3/37 8.1 Kovacic 2/20 10.0 Kramer 0/37 0.0 10/85 11.8 31/356 8.7 5/28 17.9 61/649 9.4 Gross Van der Heyden Abbasi Total Heterogeneity p = 0.33 12 % Risk (95% CI) 16 Naylor et al, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:379-387 20 30 Day Adverse Events, (%) 35 CS + OHS, (N = 56) 30 25 20 CEA + OHS, (N = 112) 21.6 p = 0.06 15 p = 0.08 p = 0.65 12.6 10.7 9.0 10 p = 0.08 3.3 MI 5.4 7.2 1.8 Stroke Death Death, MI, or Stroke “I strongly recommend against staged or combined CEA in CABG patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.” Borger MA , J Card Surg 2005;20:58-59 Limitations of Previous Work • Lack of accounting for interval events like death, MI, or stroke • No direct comparison of three approaches • Outcomes limited to 30-day or in-hospital • Many studies with small sample size and with unadjusted analyses The Cleveland Clinic Experience 1997-2009 Severe Carotid disease in OHS population Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Staged CEA-CABG Combined CEA-CABG Carotid Artery stenting (CAS) Staged CAS-CABG Shishehbor et al, JACC 2013 The Cleveland Clinic Experience 1997-2009 Carotid revascularization in Open Heart Surgery (OHS) population (1997–2009) Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) 90 days 90 days Staged CEA-OHS Combined CEA-OHS Staged CAS-OHS Shishehbor et al, JACC 2013 Study End Points Interval death, stroke, MI Staged CEA-OHS Combined CEA-OHS Staged CAS-OHS Primary end point: Composite of death, stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) Secondary end points: death, stroke, MI Shishehbor et al, JACC 2013 Statistical Methods Time to event analysis Multiphase hazard function model* Modulated renewal strategy Propensity score adjustment *Blackstone, EH et al Journal of the American Statistical *Association 1986,81:615-624 Results Carotid revascularization and OHS, n=350 CEA, n=45 CAS, n=110 Interval deaths n=3 Interval deaths n=6 OHS n=42 Combined CEA-OHS n=195 OHS n=104 Shishehbor et al, JACC 2013 Baseline Characteristics Staged CEA-OHS n = 45 Combined CEA-OHS n = 195 Staged CAS-OHS n = 110 p value 27 (64) 96 (49) 53 (51) 0.21 History of stroke (%) (21) 39 (20) 36 (35) 0.02 History of TIA (%) (14) 21 (11) 24 (22) 0.01 Ipsilateral carotid symptoms 10 (22) 32 (16) 24 (22) 0.42 Contralateral carotid stenosis 80-99% (%) (4.4) 22 (11) (5.5) 0.02 Contralateral carotid occlusion (%) (16) 24 (12) 13 (12) 0.35 Prior hx of carotid revascularization (%) (11) 13 (6.7) 20 (18)

Ngày đăng: 15/11/2016, 10:59

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w