1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Communication style at the Vietnamese and American workplace

6 1,6K 39

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 6
Dung lượng 134,43 KB

Nội dung

Communication style at the Vietnamese and American workplace Phong cách giao tiếp công sở ở Việt Nam và Mỹ Phạm Thanh Huyền University of Languages and International studies M.A Minor

Trang 1

Communication style at the Vietnamese and

American workplace Phong cách giao tiếp công sở ở Việt Nam và Mỹ

Phạm Thanh Huyền

University of Languages and International studies M.A Minor Thesis English Linguistics; Mã số: 60 22 15

Supervisor : M.A Phan Thị Vân Quyên

Năm bảo vệ: 2012

Abstract Facing the fact that more and more Vietnamese and Americans have to work

with each other due to the globalization, this study has been carried out to investigate and describe the Vietnamese and American communication style at the workplace Data were obtained from 30 Vietnamese and 30 Americans who have experience working with foreigners (i.e Americans and Vietnamese) in different companies After analyzing and discussing the results of the survey, a number of potential problems experienced by Vietnamese and Americans when communicating were revealed Based on these barriers, the study provided some concluding remarks of this study Though the research is in small scale and cannot cover all problems faced by Vietnamese and Americans in intercultural working environment, the author of this study hopes that it will contribute to identifying the problems Vietnamese and Americans may experience and help their communication become easier and more effective

Keywords.Tiếng Anh; Giao tiếp; Giao tiếp công sở

Content

The study consists of 5 chapters:

Chapter 1: Introduction presents the rationale, the objectives, the scope, the

significance, the methods and the design of the study

Chapter 2: Theoretical background starts with the definitions of culture,

communication and intercultural communication Then, Hofstede’s and Hall’s cultural dimensions are presented and discussed After that the communication style at the workplace are taken into consideration as well as some potential problems in multicultural

Trang 2

working environment are identified Finally, the previous studies is mentioned and evaluated

Chapter 3: Methodology presents the methodology used in this study This part

consists of 3 parts: the selection of participants in which the author gives some reasons for the selection and the description of the participants; the data collection instruments in which the instrument and procedure of data analysis are discussed; methods of data collection in which the methods and procedure of data collection are identified

Chapter 4: Findings and discussion introduces the results of the survey which

describe the differences between Vietnamese and American communication style, which leads to problems occurring when Vietnamese and American people communicate at the workplace Then, the findings are analyzed and discussed

Chapter 5: Conclusion presents the conclusion, implication for people working in

intercultural working environment, the limitations of the study in which the author states the reasons for the study’s limitations, and suggestions for further study

References

In English

1 Aguinis, H (2002) The Search for Universals in Cross-Cultural Organisational Behavior Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

2 Bakacsi, G et al (2002) Eastern European cluster: tradition and transition

Journal of World Business, p 69-80

3 Beamer, L., & Varner, I (2008) Intercultural communication in the workplace

New York: McGraw-Hill

4 Bennett, M J (1998) Intercultural communication: A current perspective

Intercultural Press

5 Borgulya, A (2007) Hungarian – German Cultural Conflicts at Work Retrieved

from www.organizzazione.unina.it/cms7/ /Borgulya.pdf

6 Burns, A (1999) Collaborative action research for English language teachers

Cambridge University Press

Trang 3

7 Du-Babcock, B (1999) Topic management and turn taking in professional communication: First- versus second-language strategies Management Communication

Quarterly, Vol 12, p 544-574

8 Earley, P C., & Mosakowski, E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning Academy of Management Journal, p

26-49

9 Erez, M (1992) Interpersonal Communication Systems in Organizations, and their Relationships to Cultural Values, Productivity and Innovation: The Case of Japanese Corporations An International Review, p 43-64

10 Hall, E T (1976) Beyond culture New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday

11 Hitt, W D (1995) The learning organization: Some reflections on organizational renewal Leadership & Organization Development Journal, p 17-26

12 Hostede, G H (1980) Culture’s consequences, international differences in work-related values Sage Publications

13 Hofstede, G H & Bond, M H (1988) The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc

14 Hofstede, G H (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind

McGraw-Hill

15 Hofstede, G H (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival McGraw-Hill

16 Jiang, W Y (2000) The relationship between culture and language Oxford

University Press, p 328-334

17 Joshi, A., Labianca, G., & Caligiuri, P M (2002) Getting along long distance: Understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis Journal of

World Business, p 277-284

18 Joynt, P & Warner, M (1996) Introduction: Cross-cultural perspectives Managing across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives International Thomson Business

Press

19 Juhn, C.; Murphy, K M & Pierce, B (1993) Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill The Journal of Political Economy, p 410-442

Trang 4

20 Keyton, J (2005) Communication research: Asking questions, finding answers

New York: McGraw-Hill

21 Kim, D., Pan, Y., & Park, H S (1998) High-versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures Psychology and Marketing,

15(6), 507-521

22 Kirkman, B L & Rosen, B (1999) Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment Academy of Management Journal, p 58-74

23 Knutson, T J., Hwang, J C., & Deng, B C (2000) Perception and management of conflict: A comparison of Taiwanese and US business employees Intercultural

Communication Studies, p 1-31

24 Koopman, P L.; Hartog, D N D & Konrad, E (1999) National Culture and Leadership Profiles in Europe: Some Results from the GLOBE Study European

Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), pp 503 – 520

25 Kraut, R E.; Fish, R.S.; Root, R.W & Chalfonte, B.L (1993) Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology The Claremont

Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp 145-199) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

26 Labianca, G.; Gray, B & Brass, D (2000) A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change during Empowerment Organization Science, p 235-257

27 Levinson, D R and Adelman, M.B (1993) Beyond Language – Cross-cultural Communication, Regent/Prentice Hall Inc

28 Lindsley, S L (1999) A layered mode of problematic intercultural communication

in U.S.-owned maquiladoras in Mexico Communication Monographs, p 145-167

29 Lustig, M W & Koester, J (1996) Intercultural competence: interpersonal communication across cultures HarperCollins College Publishers

30 Martinsons, M & Westwood, R (1997) Management information systems in the Chinese business culture: An explanatory theory Information & Management, 32(5), p

215–228

31 Mary, M (1993) Cross-cultural communication for managers Business Horizons,

p 69

Trang 5

32 Mcphee, R D (1985) Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions Beverly Hill, CA: Sage, pp 149-177

33 Morden, T (1995) International culture and management Management Decision,

33(2), pp 16 – 21

34 Newman, K L & Nollen, S D (1996) Culture and Congruence: The Fit between Management Practices and National Culture Journal of International Business Studies,

Vol 27, No 4, p 753-779

35 Richards, J C., Platt, J and Platt, H (1992), Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, Longman

36 Richardson, R.M., & Smith, S.W (2007) The influence of high/low-context culture and power distance on choice of communicationmedia: Students’media choice to communicate with professors in Japan and America International Journal of Intercultural

Relations, 31(4), p.479–501

37 Samovar, L A & Porter, R E (1991) Communication between Cultures

Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth

38 Shenkar, O., & Zeira, Y (1987) Human resources management in international joint ventures: Directions for research Academy of Management Review, p 546-557

39 Shuter, R., & Wiseman, R (1994) Communication in multinational organizations: Conceptual, theoretical, and practical issues Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

40 Simons, R (1995) Levers of Control Boston: Harvard Business School Press

41 Ting-Toomey, S (1999) Communication across cultures New York: Guilford

Press

42 Tokarek, M (2006) How to manage intercultural communication People

Management, p 66-67

43 Triandis, H C (1995) Individualism and Collectivism Boulder, Colorado:

Westview Press

44 Usunier, J C & Lee, J (2005) Marketing across cultures Financial Times

45 Verma,G (1999) Researching Education: Perspectives and Techniques Falmer

Press

Trang 6

46 Weaver, K M (2000) Attitudes toward Cooperative Strategies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Entrepreneurs Journal of International Business Studies, 31, Fourth Quarter

2000: p 591-609

47 Webb, G (1996) Understanding Staff development Society of research for Higher Education London

48 Wierzbicka, A (2003), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics - The Semantics of Human Interaction, Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Berlin

49 Wikipedia

Retrieved from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unstructured_interview

50 Williams, K.Y.; Morris, M W.; Leung, K.; Bhatnagar, D.; HU, J.C.; Kondo, M &

Luo, J L (1998) Culture, Conflict Management, and Underlying Values: Accounting for Differences in Styles of Handling Conflicts among US, Chinese, Indian, and Filipino Managers Journal of international business studies, 29(4), pp 729-748

51 Ybema, S & Byun, H (2009) Cultivating Culture Differences in Asymmetric Power Relations Cross Culture Management, 9 (3), pp 339-358

52 Yum, J O (1988) The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia Communication Monographs, 55 (4), pp 374-388

In Vietnamese

1 Nguyễn Quang Ngoạn (2004) Some Vietnamese-American Cross-cultural Similarities and Differences in Disagreeing with Power-Unequals, M.A Thesis, Vietnam National University – Hanoi

2 Nguyễn Quang (2007) Giao tiếp phi ngôn từ qua các nền văn hoá, NXB Đại Học Quốc

Gia Hà Nội

Ngày đăng: 10/08/2015, 19:51

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w