Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
Nội dung bản trích yếu: Mục đích và đối tượng nghiên cứu của luận án Mục tiêu nghiên cứu của luận án là định hướng các chỉ báo của bộ công cụ đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH phù hợp trong bối cảnh ở Việt Nam, và được cụ thể hoá như sau: - Hệ thống và làm sáng rõ những vấn đề lý luận về bộ công cụ đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH; - Phân tích thực trạng phát triển DNXH ở Việt Nam và đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH ở Việt Nam; - Đề xuất các chỉ báo của bộ công cụ đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH và kiểm chứng thực tiễn ở Việt Nam; - Hướng dẫn ứng dụng bộ công cụ đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH ở Việt Nam ở một số lĩnh vực hoạt động doanh nghiệp. Đối tượng nghiên cứu của luận án là DNXH và bộ công cụ đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH ở Việt Nam. Phạm vi nghiên cứu bao gồm nội dung nghiên cứu, không gian và thời gian nghiên cứu. Các phương pháp nghiên cứu đã sử dụng Luận án sử dụng kết hợp cả phương pháp nghiên cứu định tính và nghiên cứu định lượng, cụ thể như sau: - Phương pháp nghiên cứu tại bàn Phương pháp nghiên cứu tại bàn bao gồm việc thu thập dữ liệu nghiên cứu trong và ngoài nước, và dữ liệu từ một số DNXH tiêu biểu ở Việt Nam. - Phương pháp điều tra khảo sát Phương pháp điều tra khảo sát được tiến hành với bảng câu hỏi và thang đo chuẩn đã được điều chỉnh sau khi nghiên cứu sơ bộ, trên quy mô hợp lý với các nhà đầu tư tác động, người nghiên cứu/hoạch định chính sách (Quy mô mẫu hơn 100 tại hai thành phố lớn là Hà Nội và Hồ Chí Minh). - Phương pháp xử lý dữ liệu Phương pháp xử lý dữ liệu là thống kê với phần mềm Microsoft Excel. Các kết quả chính và kết luận Lợi ích của các DNXH được đánh giá trên 4 khía cạnh chính là Phát triển kinh tế (Economy - E), Phát triển xã hội (Society - S), Bảo vệ môi trường (Geography - G) và Phát triển cá nhân (Human - H) của Phát triển bền vững. Khi đánh giá lợi ích kinh tế, các DNXH nên có cách sắp xếp thứ tự từ cao đến thấp như sau: E3 ~ SDG12: Đảm bảo các hình mẫu sản xuất và tiêu dùng bền vững E1 ~ SDG8: Khuyến khích tăng trưởng kinh tế dài hạn, tạo việc làm đầy đủ, năng suất cao và bền vững cho tất cả mọi người E2 ~ SDG9: Xây dựng cơ sở hạ tầng đồng bộ, khuyến khích quá trình công nghiệp hóa toàn diện và bền vững, thúc đẩy đổi mới Khi đánh giá lợi ích xã hội, các DNXH nên có cách sắp xếp thứ tự từ cao xuống thấp như sau: S2 ~ SDG5/6/16: Giảm bất bình đẳng trong xã hội S3 ~ SDG17: Tăng cường mối quan hệ hữu nghị giữa các khu vực S1: Xây dựng các đô thị, cộng đồng dân cư an toàn, đồng bộ và bền vững Khi đánh giá lợi ích môi trường, các DNXH nên có cách sắp xếp thứ tự từ cao xuống thấp như sau: G3 ~ SDG6/ SDG14: Sử dụng bền vững các nguồn tài nguyên nước và biển G1 ~ SDG7/ SDG13: Triển khai các hoạt động để giải quyết vấn đề biến đổi khí hậu và các tác động của nó. G2 ~ SDG15: Bảo vệ và khuyến khích sử dụng bền vững hệ sinh thái trên bề mặt đất Khi đánh giá lợi ích con người, các DNXH nên có cách sắp xếp thứ tự từ cao xuống thấp như sau: H1 ~ SDG1/ SDG2: Làm giảm tỉ lệ đói nghèo H2 ~ SDG3: Đảm bảo cuộc sống lành mạnh, sử dụng nguồn nước đảm bảo sức khỏe H3 ~ SDG4: Đảm bảo giáo dục chất lượng toàn diện, công bằng và thúc đẩy cơ hội học tập cho mọi người Các DNXH hướng tới cân bằng trong việc tạo ra lợi ích tới xã hội và duy trì tài chính bằng cách lồng ghép SDG vào mô hình kinh doanh tạo tác động (impact business model) của doanh nghiệp. Đánh giá lợi ích của DNXH chính là đánh giá những nỗ lực hoạt động của các DNXH góp phần thực hiện SDG, trên bốn tiêu chí là Kinh tế - Xã hội - Môi trường - Con người như bốn mặt của một kim tự tháp mà luận án đặt tên là Kim tự tháp phát triển bền vững. Giáo viên hướng dẫn Nghiên cứu sinh
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOREIGN TRADE UNIVERSITY - SUMMARY OF PHD THESIS BUILDING A TOOLKIT FOR ASSESSING BENEFITS OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM Major: Business Administration Code number: 9340101 NGUYỄN QUANG HUY Hà Nội – 2022 The thesis is completed at: Foreign Trade University Science instructor: Assoc Prof., Dr Dao Ngoc Tien; Assoc Prof., Phạm Thị Hồng Yến Reviewer 1: Reviewer 2: Reviewer 3: The research will be protected in front of the at council meeting INTRODUCTION Research rationale The model of social enterprise (SE) or impact business (social and environmental impact) is spreading strongly around the world Enterprises are now developing innovative business activities to address social and environmental issues, especially in the context of increasing natural disasters and epidemics In Vietnam, activities that use business as a tool to create benefits for the community, especially disadvantaged communities, have been around for a long time Many organizations in Vietnam are identified with full social enterprise characteristics (CIEM, British Council and CSIP, 2012, p.19) Social enterprises that balance between social mission and profit goals have been creating a direct and lasting impact on the surrounding community In the context of the Vietnamese Government's efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, developing the social enterprise sector is developing a more sustainable and inclusive approach to economic growth, through innovation and technology; improving labor productivity, while solving social and environmental problems in the country Social enterprises in Vietnam are facing many challenges and difficulties to grow, and measuring social impact is the weakest area Only a few enterprises use independent tools or independent social impact measurement tools (National Economics University and UNDP, 2018, p.37) Measurement standards for the success of social enterprises are not yet available, and impact data is still a challenge for social enterprises to collect and share With the reality analyzed above, the topic "Building a toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam" is very urgent and has practical significance in both theory and practice Research objective The objective of the thesis is to propose the criteria of the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in accordance with the Vietnamese context The toolkit will help social enterprises in particular and impact organizations in general in Vietnam get orientations in impact measurement and management, as well as help stakeholders such as impact investors and the Government have orientations in supporting social enterprises and towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Object and scope of research The research object of the thesis is social enterprises and the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam Research scope includes research content, research space and time - Scope of research content The thesis focuses on orienting the criteria of the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam The thesis mentions the evaluation process but not specifically This will be another research content in the future with training and consulting programs to improve business capacity The thesis is aimed at impact investors, researchers/policy-makers, and social enterprises in Vietnam The way to select evaluation criteria from the perspective of impact investors, researchers/policy-makers is to contribute to proposing an independent set of tools when the assessment objects (impact investor, researchers/policy makers) are independent of the assessed subjects (social enterprises) First, impact investors are those who seek to maximize social and environmental impact through financial activities They use social or environmental benefits as their primary goal and may accept some financial disadvantage such as interest rates on loans Impact investors sometimes also accept investment into social enterprises with higher risks or towards social and environmental goals that are difficult to combine with potentially profitable activities Government is one group of impact investors Second, impact investors, researchers/policy-makers can also be customers who purchase products and/or services of social enterprises - Scope of research space and time The thesis conducted research in Hanoi and HCM These are two big cities, the economic centers of Vietnam gathering most of impact investors, researchers/policy-makers as well as social enterprises The thesis collects secondary and primary data The secondary data is used to serve the research, analysis and evaluation process mainly from 2010 to present The primary data used for analysis in the thesis are collected directly from the subjects surveyed from 2018 to 2020 The thesis provides orientations and recommendations to 2030 Research question - What is Social Enterprise? What are the benefits of Social Enterprises? - Which toolkits assess the benefits of social enterprises today? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each toolkit? - What is the context of Vietnam? What are the criteria of the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam? - What are trends of social enterprises and assessment of future benefits? What orientations and recommendations are given to guide the toolkit for assessing the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam? Research methods The thesis uses a combination of both qualitative and quantitative research methods, specifically: - Desk-research method The desk-research method includes the collection of research data at home and abroad, and data from some typical social enterprises in Vietnam - Survey method The survey method is conducted with a standard questionnaire and scale that has been adjusted after preliminary research, on a reasonable scale with impact investors, researchers/policy makers - Data processing method Data processing method is statistical with Microsoft Excel software Structure of the thesis In addition to the introduction, conclusion, list of references, appendix, the thesis has four chapters, including Chapter 1: Research overview and theoretical basis for the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises; Chapter 2: Research methods, building a toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam; Chapter 3: The current situation and research findings on the toolkit for assessing the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam; Chapter 4: Orientations, recommendations for the toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam CHAPTER 1: RESEARCH OVERVIEW AND THEORETICAL BASIS ON THE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES 1.1 Research overview Social enterprises are a new type of business, characterized by an entrepreneur's approach to providing activities in line with a clear social and/or environmental mission Social enterprises are becoming the center of the global economic system (Borzaga & Defourny 2001; Nicholls 2006, 2009, 2010; Galera & Borzaga 2009; OECD/EU 2013) The complex nature of social enterprises, coupled with their increasing number and influence around the world (Drayton 2002; Bornstein 2004; Harding 2004; Nicholls 2006, 2009; Nicholls & Young 2008; Defourny & Nyssens 2008; OECD 2009; OECD / EU 2013), has made understanding and assessing the benefits of social enterprises an important priority for all stakeholders of social enterprises Benefit assessment or impact measurement (social and environmental) is not an unfamiliar concept to western countries, especially the UK with a background of more than 50 years of benefit assessment research However, for Vietnam, most businesses are not aware of how to evaluate the benefits of social enterprises According to the Report "Promoting the development of the social enterprise sector with impact in Vietnam" by Truong Nam Thang et al (2018), up to 86% of the total 49,980 enterprises in the self-measurement research survey impact without using an existing model Also in this report, up to 46.4% of surveyed enterprises identified themselves as very weak in the field of impact measurement Recognizing this research gap, the thesis "Building a toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam" will have contributions in both theory and practice In theory, the thesis systemizes and compares the existing benefit assessment toolkits On the basis considering the context of sustainable development orientation, the thesis investigates the factors affecting the assessment of the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam, and builds the criteria of a set of tools suitable for the purpose of social enterprises case with preliminary practical verification The toolkit proposes the Benefit Creation Index (BCI) – an index that evaluates benefits created on four aspects: economic, social, environmental and human In practice, the thesis gives orientations, proposes guidelines for toolkits to assess the benefits of social enterprises in particular and other organizations in general The saying of James Harington, an international expert in the field of organizational management, can be applied to all areas of management "What cannot be measured cannot be understood, cannot be understood if cannot be controlled can be controlled, if it is not controlled, it cannot be improved” 1.2 Theoretical foundations of social enterprise 1.2.1 The process of forming and developing social enterprises The social enterprise model first appeared in London, United Kingdom in 1665, when the Great Plague raged many wealthy families, who were industrial and commercial owners, withdrew from the city leaving a rapid increase in unemployment among the working poor In that context, Thomas Firmin set up a production enterprise and used his personal financial resources to supply raw materials for the factory to create and maintain jobs for 1,700 workers Right from its inception, Thomas Firmin stated that the enterprise did not pursue the goal of profit maximization and that the profits would be transferred to charities Social enterprises only really thrived to form a widespread movement with the appearance it is today since British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979 Thatcher advocated narrowing the role of the State and allowing that the State should not directly provide social welfare The state must consider the civil society sector (also known in a narrower sense as the third sector in comparison with the public and private sectors) as a key partner in solving social problems ( CIEM, British Council & CSIP, 2012) In the past five decades, social enterprises have grown strongly beyond national borders and become a movement with global influence An exact data on the number of social enterprises operating worldwide has not been reported Although the general model of social enterprises has been 12 jointly responsible in their operations, and the development of appropriate reporting techniques and measures (Crowther, 2000) The Theory of Change (ToC) Toolkit: Explain the process of change by outlining cause and effect relationships, or short, medium, and long-term goals (objectives) ) of a change initiative (Brest, 2010) Social Return on Investment (SROI) Toolkit: Provides a consistent quantitative approach to understanding and managing the benefits of a project, business, or policy SROI considers stakeholder views of interests and assigns financial values to all interests identified by stakeholders that typically have no market value (Social Value UK, 2009) Investment Standards and Impact Reporting (IRIS) Toolkit: A set of standardized measures that can be used to measure and describe the social, environmental and financial performance of organizations and businesses receive impact investment capital (GIIN, 2009) Lean Social Business Model (SMBC) Toolkit: Visually present an enterprise's business model, and describe how it creates, delivers, and captures value (Osterwalder, 2010) SAA and SBMC are more supportive for business assessment purposes SROI and IRIS for impact investors CBA for authorities TOCs collectively support the goals of both the business and its stakeholders; framework And no matter which toolkit is selected for implementation, the 13 implementation process needs to collect data with appropriate, specific and clear criteria or the evaluator needs to define indicators and indicators) 14 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH METHODS, ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BENEFITS OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM 2.1 Research design The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), also known as the Global Goals, are universal goals designed to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that everyone is enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030 in each member state of the United Nations (UN) The Government of Vietnam in 2017 localized 17 SDGs in the “National Action Plan to Implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” as part of its commitment to social development in Vietnam This Agenda is implemented to ensure a better and safer life for all Vietnamese people, now and in the future The Government of Vietnam issued Resolution 136/NQ-CP on September 25, 2020 In the context of Vietnam, the toolkit will integrate the SDG Sustainable Development Goals into indicators and indicators Firstly, SDG is already available, and widely communicated and accepted at home and abroad Second, the SDG is inclusive and general As a member of the United Nations, Vietnam is aiming to achieve the SDGs by 2030 for a shared vision of sustainable development 2.2 Building assessment indicators The concept of "benefit" is "defuzzed" into evaluation indicators in four areas: Economic Development (Economy E), Social Development (Society - S), Environmental 15 Protection (Geography - G) and Human Development (Human - H) of sustainable development The linked indicators correspond to the SDGs 2.3 Survey and analysis Based on the results of qualitative research, there are 36 identified factors To test the relevance of these factors in practice, the study conducted a survey and survey with a structured questionnaire sent to 250 subjects The subjects of the survey are impact investors and researchers/policy makers for social enterprises The survey questionnaire was designed with 41 questions In which, there are questions about personal information of survey respondents and 36 questions about factors related to the benefits of social enterprises A 5point Likert scale (ascending) is used: (1) = Not at all important; (2) = Doesn't matter; (3) = Relatively important; (4) = Important; (5) = Very important 16 CHAPTER THE SITUATION AND KEY FINDINGS ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM 3.1 Current status of social enterprise development in Vietnam The process of formation and development of social enterprises in Vietnam can be divided into three main stages as follows: (i) Before Doi Moi 1986, social enterprises were associated with collective ownership, operating in the form of cooperatives to serve the needs of disadvantaged community groups; (ii) From 1986 to 2010, social enterprises associated with NGOs and funding sources mainly from foreign organizations; (iii) From 2011 - now, since Vietnam became a lowmiddle-income country, social enterprises have operated according to market principles, capital sources have shifted from external funding to revenue from business activities (CIEM, British Council & CSIP 2012) Research 2019 by CIEM, British Council and Social Enterprise UK estimates that there are 19,125 organizations that can be transformed into social enterprises in Vietnam, including 1,000 NGOs, 12,536 cooperatives and 5,589 SMEs with social and/or environmental goals 3.2 Current status of impact investment and assessment of the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam 17 Vietnam is a potential market for impact investing Evaluating the benefits of enterprises in general has received a lot of attention in Vietnam 3.3 Survey results All economic development indicators are of interest to impact investors, researchers/policy makers Indicator E3 Ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns are given the most attention Therefore, social enterprises need to pay more attention to sustainable economic development goals, and give them top priority When assessing economic benefits, social enterprises should arrange the order from high to low as follows: • E3 ~ SDG12: Ensuring sustainable production and consumption patterns • E1 ~ SDG8: Encourage long-term economic growth, full employment, high productivity and sustainability for all • E2 ~ SDG9: Building synchronous infrastructure, encouraging inclusive and sustainable industrialization, promoting innovation All social development indicators are of interest to impact investors, researchers/policy makers Indicator S1 Building efficient, safe, synchronous and sustainable urban areas and communities is of least concern Part of the reason may be that the goal of building efficient, safe, synchronous and sustainable urban areas and residential communities depends a lot on security policies implemented by the State and 18 at all levels of government local authority, and social enterprises can only have very little influence When assessing social benefits, social enterprises should have a way to arrange the order from high to low as follows: • S2 ~ SDG5/6/16: Reducing inequality in society • S3 ~ SDG17: Strengthening friendly relations between regions • S1 ~ SDG11: Building safe, synchronous and sustainable cities and residential communities All environmental protection indicators are of interest to impact investors, researchers/policy makers Indicator N3 Sustainable use of water and marine resources is of most concern Social enterprises should grasp the trend and aim for more "green" activities When assessing environmental benefits, social enterprises should arrange the order from high to low as follows: • G3 ~ SDG6/ SDG14: Sustainable use of marine and water resources • G1 ~ SDG7/ SDG13: Implement activities to address climate change and its impacts • G2 ~ SDG15: Protect and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems All human development indicators are of interest to impact investors, researchers/policy makers Indicator H1 Poverty reduction is the most concerned When the quality of people's material life is stabilized and health is ensured, human development can be carried out and promoted in the best way 19 When assessing human benefits, social enterprises should have a way to arrange the order from high to low as follows: • H1 ~ SDG1/ SDG2: Reducing poverty rate • H2 ~ SDG3: Ensure a healthy life, use healthy water • H3 ~ SDG4: Ensure inclusive, equitable quality education and promote learning opportunities for all In summary, the factors affecting the assessment of the benefits of the surveyed social enterprises are significant Economic Development, Social Development, Environmental Protection and Human Development are the component indicators of the BCI Benefit Innovation Index to assess the benefits of social enterprises in Vietnam 3.4 Practical validation of the toolkit 09 Social Enterprises (Imagtor, KOTO, KymViet, Sapanapro, Sapa O'Chau, Tohe, KILOMET109, Mekong Plus, Green Generation) selected for practical verification of the toolkit are typical social enterprises of various industries Due to different professions and fields, the verification highlights the universality of the toolkit, and encourages spillover effects from these businesses to the social enterprise community in particular and organizations creating social impact association in general Social enterprises aim to balance in creating social benefits and maintaining finance by integrating SDG into their impact business models Evaluating the benefits of social enterprises is the assessment of the efforts of social enterprises to contribute to the implementation of the SDGs These 20 benefits/activity efforts of social enterprises are evaluated on four aspects: Economy - Society - Environment - Human as the four sides of a pyramid that the thesis named the Pyramid of Sustainable Development 21 CHAPTER ORIENTATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON BENEFITS ASSESSMENT TOOL OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM 4.1 Orientation for developing social enterprises in Vietnam The social enterprise model in Vietnam has many new potentials and prospects in the coming time Firstly, the inevitable development needs of society Second, the development speed and existing potential of the system of social enterprises in Vietnam Third, the dynamism of the economy as well as human resources aspire to rise up in the coming time Fourthly, the social enterprise model is a viable option for the disadvantaged classes 4.2 Recommendations for appling the toolkit for social enterprises The first is governance Indicators and indicators to evaluate benefits are integrated into the enterprise's management and measurement system Businesses and organizations need more than one mission 22 The toolkit includes the BCI Benefit Creation Index and assessment indicators, and the Benefit Innovation Index is calculated by the following formula: BCI = Ie + Is + Ig + Ih To calculate benefit indicators, Social Enterprises need to: (i) Identify stakeholders for each activity of the business The Value chain model of each organization can be mapped according to the Logical Benefit Assessment Framework as Input Activities Output Outcome Impact; (ii) Identify the changes of related objects Changes will be evaluated and/or measured, so Social Enterprises choose SMART changes (Specific - Measurable - Achievable/ Attainable - Relevant – Timebound) Second, is communication Metrics and benefits metrics are incorporated into the brand story and corporate reports Businesses and organizations need to know how to build stories and tell stories as a basic success factor of marketing and branding, reporting Social enterprises integrate goals and benefits to society and the environment in their stories and 23 connect emotionally with parties, becoming an inspiration for personal values To communicate benefit indicators, social enterprises need to: (i) Clarify social and/or environmental objectives and missions Enterprises build an inspirational Vision in business; (ii) Commitment to ValUes, business messages towards customers, society and the community; (iii) Selection of expressions and communications accompanying the report and changes in perceptions of stakeholders (Agility) In each evaluation aspect, social enterprises should have a way to arrange the order when conducting benefit assessment according to the scale value of the indicators presented in the perious chapter - Survey results 24 CONCLUSION Social enterprise is a model that balances profit goals and social and/or environmental goals in order to create positive changes to the community around them With an estimated number of nearly 20,000 social enterprises at present (including businesses and organizations that have all the basic characteristics of a social enterprise but have not yet registered or converted as a social enterprise) and potential for future development in Vietnam Nam, assessing the benefits of social enterprises should become a practice And more than ever, social enterprises in Vietnam also need guidance on a set of assessment tools and practical implementation Combining research methods, qualitative and quantitative construction, the thesis proposes components of a toolkit to assess the benefits of social enterprises The focus is on the BCI Benefit Creation Index, which is concretized with indicators to assess the benefits of economic development, social development, environmental protection and human development as Ie, Is, Ig, Ih Indicators are assessed and measured against the SDGs This benefit assessment toolkit can be applied to impact business and impact investing Because “what cannot be measured cannot be understood, cannot be understood, cannot be controlled, cannot be controlled, cannot be improved”, and impact or benefit is one of the “what” to be measured The toolkit is built with a growth mindset, with many open orientations on benefit assessment Full evaluation is no easy task, and with benefits the difficulty level increases The benefit assessment toolkit itself is an asset the benefit and be the benefit LIST OF PAPERS PUBLISHED Nguyễn Quang Huy, Social entrepreneurship in Vietnam, LSEED (Lasallian Social Enterprise for Economic Development Center, De La Salle University) WeCAN Talk, số (08/2021), 2021 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Đánh giá lợi ích doanh nghiệp xã hội Việt Nam, Tạp chí Kinh tế Châu Á Thái Bình Dương, số 591 (06/2021), 2021, tr.46-48, ISSN: 0868-3808 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Legal form for social enterprise: Perspective from the United Kingdom and recommendation for Vietnam, Tạp chí Cơng thương, số 11 (05/2021), 2021, tr.72-76, ISSN: 0866-7756 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Đánh giá lợi ích doanh nghiệp xã hội: Nghiên cứu tổng quan gợi ý thực hành, Tạp chí Cơng thương, số 10 (05/2021), 2021, tr.296-301, ISSN: 0866-7756 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Factors affecting decision-making behavior of social enterprise investment in Vietnam, Tạp chí Cơng thương, số 10 (05/2021), 2021, tr.367-371, ISSN: 0866-7756 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Lựa chọn hình thức pháp lý cho Quỹ tín thác trường đại học Việt Nam, Tạp chí Quản lý Kinh tế quốc tế, số 136 (04/2021), 2021, tr.134-148, ISSN: 2615-9856 (Đồng tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Nghiên cứu hoạt động đổi sáng tạo doanh nghiệp xã hội Việt Nam, Đề tài Khoa học Công nghệ cấp Bộ, 2020, B2020-NTH-04 (Đồng tác giả) LIST OF RELEVANT CERTIFICATES COMPLETED Impact Management and Measurement (05/2021), ImpactAIM/UNDP & KisStartup (Vietnam) Global Social Innovation Coach Training Program (07/2020), Underdogs (South Korea) Improving Capacity of SMEs Consultants (12/2019), SCORE Programme/ILO & The Assistance Center for SMEs (Vietnam) Investor Training (03/2019), GIST/United States Department of State (U.S) Asia-Pacific Youth Labor Trend Forum (12/2018), Institute of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health/ Ministry of Labor (Taiwan) Mentoring Social Impact Business (03/2018), Institute for Social Innovation and Impact/ University of Northampton (U.K) & Center for Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship/National Economics University (Vietnam) Training of Trainers Program on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (01/2017), IPP2/Ministry of Science and Technology (Vietnam) & Finland Business and Investment Readiness for Social Enterprise (04/2016), Red Ochre (U.K) & British Council (Vietnam) Practical Training of Business (07/2014), JICA (Japan) 10 Social Entrepreneurship (04/2012), Indiana University (U.S) ... giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Đánh giá lợi ích doanh nghiệp xã hội Việt Nam, Tạp chí Kinh tế Châu Á Thái Bình Dương, số 591 (06/2021), 2021, tr.4 6-4 8, ISSN: 086 8-3 808 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Legal... 2021, tr.7 2-7 6, ISSN: 086 6-7 756 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Đánh giá lợi ích doanh nghiệp xã hội: Nghiên cứu tổng quan gợi ý thực hành, Tạp chí Cơng thương, số 10 (05/2021), 2021, tr.29 6-3 01, ISSN:... 086 6-7 756 (Tác giả) Nguyễn Quang Huy, Factors affecting decision-making behavior of social enterprise investment in Vietnam, Tạp chí Cơng thương, số 10 (05/2021), 2021, tr.36 7-3 71, ISSN: 086 6-7 756