Trang 1 FACULTY OF LAW**********FINAL-TERM EXAMINATION REPORTPIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL: A COMPARATIVEANALYSIS OF LEGAL APPROACHES IN INTERNATIONALJURISDICTIONS AND THE IMPLICATION FOR
FOREIGN TRADE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LAW ********** FINAL-TERM EXAMINATION REPORT PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL APPROACHES IN INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTIONS AND THE IMPLICATION FOR VIETNAMESE LAW Student name: Nguyen Minh Hien Student ID: 2112250033 Course: Law on Enterprises Class code: PLUE401(HK1-2324)1.2 Instructor: Dr Ha Cong Anh Bao Ha Noi – 10/2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .2 INTRODUCTION PART 1: Concept of Piercing the corporate veil Definition and Historical Development Purpose and Rationale Behind Piercing the corporate veil .4 Legal Principles Governing Piercing the corporate veil PART 2: Legal Approaches to Piercing the corporate veil in International Jurisdictions Common Law Jurisdictions Civil Law Jurisdictions PART 3: Implications for Vietnamese Law 10 Current Legal Framework in Vietnam 10 Comparative Analysis of International Approaches .11 Potentialities, Challenges and Considerations for Adopting Similar Approaches in Vietnam 12 Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Adopting Piercing the corporate veil 13 Recommendations for Vietnamese Law .14 Conclusion 15 References 16 INTRODUCTION This report aims to explore the concept of Piercing the corporate veil and examine its legal approaches in some international jurisdictions: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France These jurisdictions were selected to provide a comprehensive understanding of the different legal systems and approaches to Piercing the corporate veil in both common law and civil law jurisdictions Furthermore, the report will assess the implications of these legal approaches for Vietnamese law, considering Vietnam's growing economy and increasing foreign investment It will evaluate whether the existing legal framework adequately addresses the challenges associated with Piercing the corporate veil and provides sufficient protection for stakeholders In conclusion, this report provides a comprehensive overview of Piercing the corporate veil, its legal approaches in international jurisdictions, and the implications and recommendations for Vietnamese law It contributes to the ongoing development and improvement of corporate governance and legal frameworks in Vietnam, promoting a more robust and investor-friendly business environment PART 1: CONCEPT OF PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL Definition and Historical Development Piercing the corporate veil Piercing the corporate veil is a legal concept that allows courts to disregard the separate legal entity of a corporation and hold individuals personally liable for the corporation's actions or debts It is a judicial remedy that pierces through the corporate structure to reach the individuals behind it The concept has its roots in common law and has evolved over time through judicial decisions and legal precedents Purpose and Rationale Behind Piercing the corporate veil of Piercing the corporate veil is to prevent misuse or abuse of the corporate form The concept serves as a safeguard to ensure that individuals cannot hide behind the corporate shield to escape liability for their wrongful actions It is based on the notion that if a corporation is being used as a mere facade or instrumentality for fraudulent or unfair purposes, then the individuals responsible should be held accountable behind Piercing the corporate veil is to achieve justice and equity It recognizes that while the corporate structure provides numerous benefits, such as limited liability for shareholders, it should not be used as a shield to perpetrate fraud, injustice, or unfairness By iercing the corporate veil, courts can ensure that individuals who exercise control over the corporation and benefit from its activities are held responsible when necessary Legal Principles Governing Piercing the corporate veil The legal principles governing Piercing the corporate veil vary among jurisdictions, but there are common factors and criteria considered by courts when determining whether to pierce the corporate veil These include: Courts examine whether there is a unity of interest and ownership between the individuals and the corporation, treating them as one and the same If the corporate form is merely an alter ego of the individuals, disregarding the corporate entity may be justified Piercing the corporate veil may be appropriate in cases involving fraud, illegality, or wrongful conduct If individuals use the corporate structure as a tool to deceive or harm others, courts may disregard the corporate entity to hold them accountable Courts consider whether the corporation has followed proper corporate formalities, such as maintaining separate finances, holding regular meetings, and keeping accurate records Failure to observe these formalities may weaken the corporate structure and increase the likelihood of piercing the veil Insufficient capitalization of the corporation may lead to Piercing the corporate veil If the corporation lacks adequate funds to meet its obligations or is undercapitalized deliberately, courts may hold individuals personally liable Courts evaluate the overall fairness of the situation and whether allowing the individuals to hide behind the corporate form would result in an unjust or inequitable outcome The application of these legal principles may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific facts of each case Courts exercise discretion in Piercing the corporate veil, ensuring that it is applied judiciously to achieve justice and protect the interests of stakeholders PART 2: LEGAL APPROACHES TO PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL IN INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTIONS The United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France were chosen as they represent major global economies with different legal systems (common law and civil law) These countries have extensive case law and legal precedents regarding Piercing the corporate veil Apart from them, other countries such as Japan, Australia, Canada, and the Netherlands also have developed and significant legal systems in this area Common Law Jurisdictions a United States In the United States, Piercing the corporate veil is primarily governed by state law, with variations across jurisdictions Courts consider several factors when determining whether to pierce the corporate veil, including: Commingling of assets between the corporation and its shareholders Failure to observe corporate formalities Undercapitalization or insufficient funds to meet obligations Fraudulent or wrongful conduct Using the corporation to evade legal obligations Dominant shareholder control over the corporation Case Law Examples: In the landmark case of "Minton v Cavaney" (1961), the court held that the corporate veil could be pierced if the corporation was a mere instrumentality or alter ego of the dominant shareholder, and justice required holding the shareholder personally liable Document continues below Discover more from: Corporate Law BLAW6996 Trường Đại học… 85 documents Go to course 179 10 F4 kit - ACCA BPP F4 revision kit Corporate Law 85% (26) Goods and Services Template - Contrac… Corporate Law 100% (2) Econs 48 Corporate Law 100% (1) LAW2450 - MAIN SEM 1, 2021 Corporate Law 100% (1) Used Answers BPP 188 ACCA F5 Kit 2016-… Corporate Law 100% (1) CD1 Phap luat - N/a 144 Corporate Law 100% (1) The case of "Walkovsky v Carlton" (1974) established that the corporate veil could be pierced if the corporation was used to perpetrate a fraud or injustice, even if it was properly formed and observed corporate formalities b United Kingdom In the United Kingdom, Piercing the corporate veil is primarily based on judicial principles, although there are statutory provisions that support this concept Section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 does indeed provide for the court to pierce the corporate veil in cases involving fraudulent trading If in the course of the winding up of a company it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the court may, on the application of the liquidator, declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in such manner are to be liable to make such contributions (if any) to the company's assets as the court thinks proper The case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897) is indeed a landmark case that established the principle of separate legal personality However, subsequent case law has recognized exceptions to this principle, allowing for Piercing the corporate veil under certain circumstances Case Law Examples: In the "Adams v Cape Industries plc" (1990) case, the court held that the corporate veil could be pierced if a subsidiary company was used as a mere facade to avoid legal obligations The "Jones v Lipman" (1962) case demonstrated that the court may disregard the corporate veil if a company is established to defraud creditors Civil Law Jurisdictions a Germany In Germany, the legal basis for Piercing the corporate veil is rooted in the general principles of civil law allows for the piercing of the corporate veil when the corporate form is abused to circumvent legal obligations or defraud creditors recognizes the responsibility of shareholders for the acts of the corporation Case Law Examples: The "ESCO Engineering Supply Company v Harza Engineering Company" (1972) case established that the corporate veil could be pierced if the corporation was a mere instrumentality of the shareholders, and the shareholders' actions caused harm b France In France, Piercing the corporate veil is known as the concept of French law allows for the disregard of legal personality when a company is used to commit fraud or when there is an abuse of corporate form to evade legal obligations or harm third parties Case Law Examples: The "Société Thévenin et Cie v Société de Construction des Batignolles" (1990) case demonstrated that the corporate veil could be pierced if there was an abuse of corporate form to evade obligations or perpetrate fraud In conclusion, in common law jurisdictions like the United States and the United Kingdom, Piercing the corporate veil is primarily guided by case law and principles, considering factors such as fraudulent conduct, commingling of assets, and failure to observe corporate formalities In civil law jurisdictions like Germany and France, the legal basis for Piercing the corporate veil lies in statutes and general principles, aiming to prevent abuse of the corporate form and protect stakeholders Understanding these legal approaches provides essential insights for evaluating the implications and potential reforms related to Piercing the corporate veil in Vietnamese law PART 3: IMPLICATIONS FOR VIETNAMESE LAW Current Legal Framework in Vietnam The misuse of the limited corporate form, particularly single-member limited liability companies (LLC), has been a concern in Vietnam The ease of establishing these companies, which not require financial proof and can be established by an individual, has led to some instances of fraudulent activity For example, the director of Dai Duong Travel Company and his two nephews were charged with fraud and embezzlement amounting to over 70 billion VND While Vietnamese corporate law has recognized and established certain legal frameworks to apply Piercing the corporate veil, there are limitations and deviations from its core principles There are two main perspectives on Piercing the corporate veil in Vietnam: However, both perspectives not fully capture the essence of Piercing the corporate veil The first approach limits Piercing the corporate veil to specific types of companies, diverging from its broader application to all businesses and contributors/managers The second approach's provisions primarily focus on punishing abuses of corporate identity, rather than embodying the fundamental principle of Piercing the corporate veil, which is to hold individuals personally liable for the company's actions 10 In conclusion, the author argues that Vietnamese corporate law has not fully embraced the principles of Piercing the corporate veil, and the current provisions only reflect certain aspects of it Comparative Analysis of International Approaches The misuse of the limited corporate form can be found in both Vietnam and other countries Both Vietnam and the other countries (US, UK, Germany, France) recognize and apply the principle of Piercing the corporate veil in corporate law They require evidence of abuse of corporate structure or fraudulent behavior before applying Piercing the corporate veil The extent of misuse and the methods employed can vary from country to country This is influenced by factors such as the ease of company incorporation, enforcement of corporate governance practices, and the effectiveness of legal and regulatory frameworks For example, in Argentina, single-shareholder corporations (SAUs) are not allowed to be incorporated or wholly owned by other SAUs In Australia, a proprietary company is a limited liability company designed for 50 shareholders or fewer and is simpler and less expensive to administer than a public company The scope of application of Piercing the corporate veil in Vietnam is more limited compared to the other countries Piercing the corporate veil in Vietnam is typically applied only in specific cases, such as limited liability companies and joint-stock companies In contrast, the other countries can apply Piercing the corporate veil to all types of businesses The criteria for applying Piercing the corporate veil also differ The US, UK, Germany, and France have their own specific criteria and requirements for 11 Piercing the corporate veil, such as commingling personal and corporate assets, inadequate capitalization, fraudulent conduct, and personal benefit However, the approach and specific criteria may vary between countries The countries have different legal provisions regarding personal liability after Piercing the corporate veil is applied Specifically, regulations on liability and penalties can vary significantly between countries, based on influence of cultural, economic, and legal systems on the application of Piercing the corporate veil For instance, countries with a strong tradition of corporate governance may have stricter criteria for Piercing the corporate veil However, the concept and application of Piercing the corporate veil continue to evolve with changing business practices and legal thought and therefore, could change over time In conclusion, while Vietnam and the other countries have already recognized and applied Piercing the corporate veil in corporate law, there are differences in the scope of application, criteria, and regulations related to personal liability after Piercing the corporate veil is applied Countries like the US, UK, Germany, and France have a more flexible approach and a broader application of Piercing the corporate veil compared to Vietnam Potentialities, Challenges and Considerations for Adopting Similar Approaches in Vietnam Vietnamese courts have not applied Piercing the corporate veil Instead, they use other tools to address issues between third-party victims and company managers, directors, or shareholders However, there are legal phenomena that could potentially apply Piercing the corporate veil in Vietnam The ease of establishing single-member limited liability companies in Vietnam has led to misuse by profit-seeking 12 entrepreneurs, causing economic damage An example is the case of Dai Duong Travel Company Some multinational corporations establish subsidiaries in tax havens to evade taxes, despite expanding their operations in Vietnam Piercing the corporate veil could potentially hold these corporations accountable if prerequisite conditions are met To apply this approach, there are certain challenges and considerations: Balancing the ease of business establishment with the potential for misuse Determining the legality of company structures and valuing transactions between companies Proving prerequisite conditions for the application of Piercing the corporate veil Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Adopting Piercing the corporate veil a Advantages of Piercing the corporate veil Adopting international approaches can enhance creditor protection and safeguard the interests of other stakeholders by holding responsible individuals accountable for corporate actions Piercing the corporate veil can deter fraudulent activities and prevent the abuse of the corporate form for personal gain, promoting a fair and transparent business environment b Disadvantages and Potential Risks 13 The adoption of international approaches may introduce uncertainty and inconsistent application in practice, potentially leading to legal ambiguity and disputes Striking a balance between creditor protection and business flexibility is crucial to maintain an attractive business environment and encourage foreign investment Recommendations for Vietnamese Law To address the implications and potential benefits and drawbacks discussed, several recommendations can be considered for Vietnamese law: Enhance the legal framework by enacting specific provisions and guidelines on Piercing the corporate veil, providing clarity and certainty for legal practitioners and stakeholders Establish clear and objective criteria for Piercing the corporate veil, considering factors such as fraudulent conduct, abuse of corporate form, and evasion of legal obligations Promote robust corporate governance practices and transparency requirements to minimize the need for Piercing the corporate veil and ensure accountability Strike a balance between protecting creditors' rights and maintaining a flexible business environment that encourages investment and entrepreneurship By implementing these recommendations, Vietnamese law can provide a solid legal framework for Piercing the corporate veil, addressing the challenges and considerations while maximizing the potential benefits for stakeholders and the overall business environment 14 CONCLUSION Recap of Key Findings In this analysis, we examined the legal approaches to Piercing the corporate veil in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France, and explored the implications for Vietnamese law Key findings include the significance of these countries' legal systems, the diversity of approaches, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of adopting international approaches Implications for Vietnamese Law The current legal framework in Vietnam regarding Piercing the corporate veil is limited, and there is a need for specific provisions and guidelines to enhance clarity and consistency Comparative analysis of international approaches provides valuable insights for shaping Vietnamese law, including the importance of balancing creditor protection with business flexibility, enhancing corporate governance and transparency, and developing clear criteria for Piercing the corporate veil Final Thoughts and Future Perspectives As Vietnam continues to experience economic growth and foreign investment, addressing the legal aspects of Piercing the corporate veil becomes increasingly important By strengthening the legal framework, promoting transparency, and considering the lessons learned from international jurisdictions, Vietnam can create a conducive business environment that protects stakeholders and encourages investment It is crucial for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders to collaborate and navigate the challenges associated with adopting international approaches while tailoring them to the unique context of Vietnam 15 REFERENCES BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF LEGAL PERSONS (2023) Available at: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Guidance-BeneficialOwnership-Legal-Persons.pdf.coredownload.pdf Douglas, L (n.d.) [online] Available at: https://www.stetson.edu/law/business-law-review/media/Spring %202022%20Tightening%20the%20Reigns%20on%20Piercing%20the%20Corproate %20Veil.pdf [Accessed 13 Oct 2023] Ferran, E and Look Chan Ho (2014) Use and Abuse of the Corporate Form as a Vehicle for Raising Finance and Managing Financial Risk , [online] pp.11–41 doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.003.0002 hallellis.co.uk (n.d.) [online] Available at: https://hallellis.co.uk/limited-liability-piercecorporate-veil/ Harvard.edu (2014) [online] Available at: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/03/27/the-three-justifications-forpiercing-the-corporate-veil/ Hickey, D (2013) [online] www.mondaq.com Available at: https://www.mondaq.com/uk/corporate-and-company-law/264752/piercing-thecorporate-veil-supreme-court-clarifies-the-english-law-position jbrown (2022) [online] North East Barristers Chambers Available at: https://nechambers.co.uk/pierce-the-corporate-veil-what-does-it-mean/ [Accessed 13 Oct 2023] 16 Jimerson, Jimerson, C.P.A.-C.B and Snell, B.N (2016) [online] www.lexology.com Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4ff8ebf0-4bca-426e-8273758140f6d0eb Kaminsky, A (2022) [online] kaminskylaw.com Available at: https://kaminskylaw.com/whatis-the-corporate-veil-and-how-can-it-be-pierced/ Khimji, M.F and Nicholls, C.C (2015) Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Canadian Common Law Courts: An Empirical Study , [online] 41(1), p.207 Available at: https://www.canlii.org/en/commentary/doc/2015CanLIIDocs5263 [Accessed 13 Oct 2023] Kryvoi, Y (2010) [online] Social Science Research Network Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1572634 [Accessed 13 Oct 2023] Kucko, M (2017) Piercing the Corporate Veil - Should English Law Go Dutch? doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3230296 Legislation.gov.uk (2013) [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/213 Mendelsohn, B and Newitt, J (2022) [online] King&Wood Mallesons Available at: https://www.kwm.com/uk/en/insights/latest-thinking/the-end-of-piercing-the-corporateveil-the-supreme-court-casts-doubt-over-the-existence-of-the-evasion-principle.html Millon, D.K (2003) Piercing the Corporate Veil, Financial Responsibility, and the Limits of Limited Liability doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.451520 17 Mucha, A (2017) Piercing V Lifting the Corporate Veil: Prest Decision in the Light of the Economic Analysis of the Company’s Limited Liability doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2962934 Nolo (2011) [online] www.nolo.com Available at: https://www.nolo.com/legalencyclopedia/personal-liability-piercing-corporate-veil-33006.html Phuong, M (2023) [online] Nova Law Vietnam Available at: https://novalaw.vn/en/types-of-company-in-vietnam-llc-jsc/ [Accessed 14 Oct 2023] Sahu, S (2012) [online] papers.ssrn.com Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2352489 Tan, C.H., Wang, J and Hofmann, C (2018) Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives , [online] 16(1) doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3254130 The abuse of company incorporation to commit fraud (2012) Available at: https://www.fraudadvisorypanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Abuse-ofIncorporation-November-2012.pdf Tjio, H (2014) The Misuse and Abuse of the Corporate Form doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2439562 tremblylaw.com (n.d.) [online] Available at: https://tremblylaw.com/does-piercing-the-corporate-veil-work-a-look-at-possiblealternatives/ [Accessed 13 Oct 2023] Tweedale, G and Flynn, L (2007) Piercing the Corporate Veil: Cape Industries and Multinational Corporate Liability for a Toxic Hazard, 1950-2004 , 8(2), pp.268–296 doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/es/khm023 18 Vietnam Business Law (n.d.) [online] Available at: https://vietnam-business-law.info/blog/2015/1/16/enterprise-law-2014piercing-corporate-veil Viettonkin (2020) [online] Available at: https://www.viettonkinconsulting.com/global-business/what-are-two-main-types-oflegal-entity-in-vietnam/ [Accessed 14 Oct 2023] Waliwona, P (2019) [online] Available at: https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/72788/Manda_Comparative_2019.pdf ?sequence=1 Wikipedia Contributors (2019a) [online] Wikipedia Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_law_in_Vietnam [Accessed 17 Nov 2019] Wikipedia Contributors (2019b) [online] Wikipedia Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil www.dlapiperintelligence.com (n.d.) [online] Available at: https://www.dlapiperintelligence.com/goingglobal/corporate/index.html?t=01-form-ofentity&c=VN 19