Trang 1 Overall band score 9 9+9+9+9See below C&C LR GRA Model answerWRITING TASK 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Some people think that a
Trang 1Overall band score 9 9+9+9+9
See below C&C LR GRA Model answer
WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any
thoughts and ideas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Write at least 250 words
Original answer -
It is often proposed that artists should be allowed to express what they feel and believe without any fear of censorship or persecution While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I believe certain regulations on the freedom of artistic expression are still necessary
Granted, there are certain benefits of granting artists complete freedom to
express their feelings and beliefs Proponents might argue freedom of expression
is the foundation of human rights, the root of human nature, and the mother of truth According to this belief, there should not be any limitations on the way artists voice their opinions of issues, ranging from personal experiences and emotions to socioeconomic and political matters Aside from this, by letting artists freely express themselves, not only would it help unleash their creative potential, but it could also incentivize the culture of experimentation and risk-taking, which
is indeed of importance to innovation and social progress
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, I am convinced that some restriction on artistic freedom is still needed Perhaps the foremost reason would
be that freedom of expression does not equate to the right to offend or harm others In other words, artistic expression that promotes hate speech, violence, or discrimination against a certain group of people should never be championed For example, the artwork of the Italian artist Max Papeschi that depicted Holocaust victims as superheroes caused widespread outrage, with many saying that it showed disrespect to the people involved His work, as a consequence, was cut out from many exhibitions
Trang 2In conclusion, although artistic freedom is indeed important, I would contend that
it should not come at the cost of causing harm or offense to others For this
reason, some limitations on the expression of artists are warranted to ensure that the arts serve their purpose of enriching society, instead of dividing it
Overall band score 9 9+9+9+9
TR – Task Response nb – GRA and LR errors have not been corrected
Band score 9
You have a clear position throughout and all parts of the question are addressed Your position is coherent and well-argued The ideas are relevant, extended, and coherent
I disagree 100% with your views – you’ve spent too long reading the Guardian and the BBC If the right is to not be offended, the effect would be that only one point
of view is ever allowed, as people are offended by the expression of a different opinion This is what we say in the “pandemic“, and as nearly always happens, those trying to should down dissent were wrong about absolutely everything Someone’s right not to be offended should not take precedence over your right
to speak freely, even if you’re wrong
In the tyrannical west nowadays, censorship is just used to shut down the
opposition – look at what happened when Tucker Carlson revealed the truth about the J6 protests – there were calls to shut him down No one made any attempt to refute what he said – they just claimed to be offended by what is basically the truth People who have a religious objection to gay marriage are accused of hate speech People were arrested in Britain for displaying Russian flags and accused of inciting racial hatred Parents who object to their infant school children being taught about gays and transsexuals are accused of “hate speech” This is what happens when you set the censorship bar so low that
you’re not allowed to offend anyone
Trang 3Better arguments would be that you’re not allowed to promote immoral
behaviour to children, or to ban porn and excessive violence, which you
mentioned
Nevertheless, lots of people would agree with you, and you supported your arguments clearly, which is why I gave you 9 for TR
Advice On Brainstorming For Task 2
As you’re planning and writing your answer, remember to constantly
ask yourself if you’re answering the question Check back to the
question a few times as you think of ideas to make sure they're
directly relevant
question
the question asks for solutions, in the plural, you must suggest at least 2
of the main body paragraphs, are directly relevant to the question
ideas in the main body paragraphs, directly support the main idea
before, as there will always be important differences
that it is consistent with the ideas in the main bodies, and that it does not contradict the introduction
It is often proposed that artists should be allowed to express what they feel and believe without any fear of censorship or persecution While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I believe certain regulations on the freedom of artistic
Granted, there are certain benefits of granting artists complete freedom to
expression is the foundation of human rights, the root of human nature, and the mother of truth According to this belief, there should not be any limitations on the way artists voice their opinions of issues, ranging from personal experiences and emotions to socioeconomic and political matters Aside from this, by letting artists freely express themselves, not only would it help unleash their creative
Trang 4potential, but it could also incentivize the culture of experimentation and
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, I am convinced that some
would be that freedom of expression does not equate to the right to offend or harm others In other words, artistic expression that promotes hate speech, violence, or discrimination against a certain group of people should never be championed For example, the artwork of the Italian artist Max Papeschi that depicted Holocaust victims as superheroes caused widespread outrage, with many saying that it showed disrespect to the people involved His work, as a
In conclusion, although artistic freedom is indeed important, I would contend that
it should not come at the cost of causing harm or offense to others For this
reason, some limitations on the expression of artists are warranted to ensure that
C&C - Cohesion and Coherence nb GRA and LR errors have not been corrected Band score 9
Excellent cohesion and coherence throughout, with no errors
The sentences have a natural flow characteristic of high band score answers
Paragraphing for Task 2
I recommend you write 4 paragraphs as follows:
After reading the introduction, the reader should have a
good idea what the essay is about, and what your position
(opinion) is It should be possible to write an introduction in
under 50 words It is not necessary to write a long
background statement
expand on the ideas sufficiently to persuade the examiner
that you’ve fully supported the main ideas If you write 3
main bodies, it is more difficult to expand and support them
sufficiently to get a high score
Trang 5 If it’s a two-part question, answer the questions in the order
they’re given and write one paragraph per question
each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence and 2 or
more supporting ideas which support the topic sentence with
reasons, evidence, and examples Do not waste time with
lots of background information
and the main ideas, and it should not introduce new ideas It
should directly answer the question Do not leave the
examiner in any doubt about whether you’ve answered the
question
to clarify your position, make sure that give a good reason to
reject one of the sides If you just restated the original ideas
about one side, the examiner may decide you have covered
one side more than the other
extent question if you have main ideas which both agree and
disagree with the proposition Avoid short paragraphs, with
under 70 words, as it may be difficult to show a clear central
topic in a short paragraph.
It is often proposed that artists should be allowed to express what they feel and believe without any fear of censorship or persecution While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I believe certain regulations on the freedom of artistic expression are still necessary
Granted, there are certain benefits of granting artists complete freedom to
the way artists voice their opinions of issues, ranging from personal experiences
artists freely express themselves, not only would it help unleash their creative potential, but it could also incentivize the culture of experimentation and
Trang 6Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, I am convinced that some
would be that freedom of expression does not equate to the right to offend or
violence, or discrimination against a certain group of people should never be championed For example, the artwork of the Italian artist Max Papeschi that
consequence, was cut out from many exhibitions
In conclusion, although artistic freedom is indeed important, I would contend that
it should not come at the cost of causing harm or offense to others For this
that the arts serve their purpose of enriching society, instead of dividing it
LR- - Lexical resource nb Some GRA errors have not been corrected
Band score 9
Vocabulary is used accurately with sufficienxt flexibility to show precise meaning, with a wide variety of vocabulary, used accurately and with a high level of control Errors are rare and occur as minor slips
It is often proposed that artists should be allowed to express what they feel and believe without any fear of censorship or persecution While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I believe certain regulations on the freedom of artistic expression are still necessary
express their feelings and beliefs Proponents might argue freedom of expression
is the foundation of human rights, the root of human nature, and the mother of truth According to this belief, there should not be any limitations on the way
Trang 7artists voice their opinions of issues, ranging from personal experiences and
emotions to socioeconomic and political matters Aside from this, by letting artists freely express themselves, not only would it help unleash their creative potential, but it could also incentivize the culture of experimentation and risk-taking, which
is indeed of importance to innovation and social progress
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, I am convinced that some
restriction on artistic freedom is still needed Perhaps the foremost reason would
be that freedom of expression does not equate to the right to offend or harm others In other words, artistic expression that promotes hate speech, violence, or
For example, the artwork of the Italian artist Max Papeschi that depicted
Holocaust victims as superheroes caused widespread outrage, with many saying that it showed disrespect to the people involved His work, as a consequence, was cut out from many exhibitions
In conclusion, although artistic freedom is indeed important, I would contend that
it should not come at the cost of causing harm or offense to others For this
reason, some limitations on the expression of artists are warranted to ensure that the arts serve their purpose of enriching society, instead of dividing it
GRA – Grammatical range and accuracy nb Some LR errors have not been corrected
Band score 9
Grammar is used accurately a wide variety of structures, which should be good for
a band score 9
Punctuation is use correctly throughout
Appropriate structures are used throughout
It is often proposed that artists should be allowed to express what they feel and believe without any fear of censorship or persecution While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I believe certain regulations on the freedom of artistic expression are still necessary
Granted, there are certain benefits of granting artists complete freedom to
express their feelings and beliefs Proponents might argue freedom of expression
Trang 8is the foundation of human rights, the root of human nature, and the mother of truth According to this belief, there should not be any limitations on the way artists voice their opinions of issues, ranging from personal experiences and emotions to socioeconomic and political matters Aside from this, by letting artists freely express themselves, not only would it help unleash their creative potential, but it could also incentivize the culture of experimentation and risk-taking, which
is indeed of importance to innovation and social progress
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, I am convinced that some restriction on artistic freedom is still needed Perhaps the foremost reason would
be that freedom of expression does not equate to the right to offend or harm others In other words, artistic expression that promotes hate speech, violence, or discrimination against a certain group of people should never be championed For example, the artwork of the Italian artist Max Papeschi that depicted Holocaust victims as superheroes caused widespread outrage, with many saying that it showed disrespect to the people involved His work, as a consequence, was cut out from many exhibitions
In conclusion, although artistic freedom is indeed important, I would contend that
it should not come at the cost of causing harm or offense to others For this
reason, some limitations on the expression of artists are warranted to ensure that the arts serve their purpose of enriching society, instead of dividing it