- Gia thuyét quan trong nao hoac sir kien nao trong tuong lai cacem mu6'n kiem tra ?
Budc 6 Diem lai cac phiidng ti fn chu chd't cua day hoc hieu qua hSng ngay
cua day hoc hieu qua hSng ngay
CuP'n sach nay mP ta 10 cau hoi can ban cd the thay, mpt ket luan kha ro rang tir viec dpc cudn sach nay, do la day hpc hieu qua la mpt qua trinh chua
dung nhieu thanh p h ^ cd tac dPng mat thiet vdi nhaụ Cung gid'ng nhu mpt vien
phi cPng kidm tra mpt danh sach toan dien trude mPi chuyén bay, nhu mpt each
thuc tu nhae nhd ban than v6 su phiic tap cua chuyén bay, va ngudi giao vien cung tu nhae nhd ve su phiic tap ctia qua tnnh day hpc. Cac cau hoi dua ra d
chuong nay cd thd dupe diing nhu mPt danh sach cac van de c&i kidm tra dp'i vdi
^ec day hpc. Dd thuan tien, cac cau hoi dupe trinh bay theo nhdm trong ^ a n g 10.3.
Bang 10.2. Phiic thao mlu cho chu de Hiroshima va Nagasaki
Tuan ThiJfhai Thifba Thi^tu ThurnSm Thijrsau
Chieu doan phim Dua ra nhiem Gidithieuvcri Trinh bay bai Cho hpc ve Hiroshima va vu tim cac an hoc sinh giangve sinh lam bai
Nagasaki nhu ducho nhiem vu dat Anhxtanh, kiem trạ thong tin dau vao Hiroshima va ravakiem Oppenheimer Yeu cau cac cua chu dẹ Nagasaki nhu nghiem gia va dy an nhom thu
mot bai tap thuyet. Manhattan thap so lieu
1 khac sau kien Tochuchpc nhu cac dau cho nhiem
1 thuc. sinh vao cac vaọ vy dat va
nhom thu thap kiem
so lieụ nghiem gia
Yeu cau hoc thuyet.
sinh bat dau tim cac so lieụ
Nhu mot kien Nhu mot Trinh bay Yeu cau hpc Cho hoc thucdauvaoyeu nhiem vu nhiem vu sinh dai bao sinh lam bai cau hoc sinh doc khac sau kien phan ioai ve Hoang de kiem trạ baibaoveHiep thuc, trinh bay nham khac Hirohito nhu Cho cac dinh 1940giua su phan tich sau kien thuc. mot npi dung nhom thu NhatvaOiicva cac sai lam kien thiic. thap so lieu
2 tac dong cua hiep trong cac doivoi
tfjnh naỵ quyetdinh nhiem vu
cua Allied va duarava
Axis. kiem
nghiem gia thuyet. Cho hoc sinh dpc Cho cac Yeu cau cac Cho hpc sinh Yeu cau cac cac bai bao ve nhom thu thap nhom tong ket lam bai kiem nhom bao
Enola Goy nhu so lieu trong vahoanthien trạ cao ket quạ mot npi dung kien nhiem vu dat cac dau vao Yeu cau cac Ghi nhan thuc. ra va kiem trong so lay nhom bao cao cac kien
nghiem gia hoc thuat. ket quạ thuc thu
3 thuyet. Cho hoc sinh dupe va cac
xemphimve bai hpc da
thoi ki sau khi dupe hpc.
Nhatdau hang nhu npi dung kien thuc.
Bang 10.3. Cac cau lidi phdn dnh tiling ng^y (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Ị Cac doan cua bai hoc đl vdi cac hanh dong va hcinh vi v. | r * .
CacnoiquyvaquytacimgxCrtrenldp: * ••,.-,iri W
• Nhungquy tac Lfngxii nao tren lop se dupe thychien? v-* •'
• Cac hpc sinh c6 dupe nh^c nhd ve cac npi quy va quy tSe ling xu hoac c6 quy t^e moi nao dupe dua ra khong?
Thong bao cac muc tieu:
• Cac hpc sinh c6 dupe nhac nho ve cac mye tieu khong hoac eo myc tieu indi dupe dua ra khong?
Theo doi cac tien bo cua hoc sinh:
• Cac hpc sinh c6 dupe cung cap cac thong tin phan hoi (Vi du: cau do, trac nghiem...) ve tien bp cua minh doi voi cac myc tieu hpc?
• Cac hpc sinh c6 dupe yeu cau ghi lai hoac bao cao ve sy tien bp cua hp?
Khen ngai thanh tich cua hoc sinh:
• Cac hpc sinh c6 biet dupe cac each thtic ghi nhan sy tien bp cua hp?
IỊ Cac doan bai hpc vcri noi dung
Kien thijTc trong tarn:
• Giao vien c6 nhan thay sy can thiet phai eo nhieu phuong tien cung cap kien thuc trong tarn?
• Giao vien se truyen dat cac kien thiic trpng tam bang cac giai thoai va chuyen kẻ • Giao vien se sii dyng cac chien thuat (thu thuat) cy the nao de dam bao rang hpc sinh
xil li thong tin moi mot each chu dong va vai tro cua minh la gi trong cac chien thuat aỷ
• Cach chia nhom nhu the nao se dupe sii dyng doi vol cac hoat dong nhu vaỷ
C^c hoat dong thi/c hanh va l<hac sau l<ien thCrc:
• Giao vien se thye hien cac hoat dong thye hanh nao va giao vien h c6 vai tro gi trong cac hoat dong dỏ
• Giao vien CO sii dyng cac hoat dong thye hanh khac nhaủ
• Hoat dong khac sau kien thijc nao se dupe su dyng va vai tro cua giao vien la gỉ • Bai tap venha CO vai tro nhu the nao trong cac hoat dong naỷ
• Nen chia nhom nhu the nao trong cac hoat dong naỷ
Nhieiin vu xay dung va kiem nghiem gia thuyet:
• Giao vien se lam gidegiup hoc sinh xay dung va kiem nghiem • Vaitrocua giao vien la gi trong cac hoat dong dỏ
• Bai tap venha CO vaitro nhu the nao trong cac hoat dong naỷ
• Nen chia nhom theo each nao doi voi cac hoat dong dỏ
IIỊ Cac doan bai hoc cho cac noi dung phai hoc dtn/dng
Loikeothamdif:
• Giao vien se su dung chien thuat nao de loi keo hoc sinh tham dủ • Giao vien c6 thay dupe su can thiet phai c6 sy da dang cua cac hoat dpng?
Su tuan thO cac noi quy va quy tac Cmg //> tren Idp: (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
• Giao vien se xii su the nao voi su tuan thu tich cuẻ • Giao vien se xu su the nao voi su tuan thu tieu cuẻ „ • Giao vien se lam gide the hiensif dan datva kiem soat?
• Giao vien se lam gi de the hien su quan tarn va hop tac?
KJ vong:
• Hpc sinh nao can dupe minhdacbietchuỷ
• Giao vien se sii dung thu thuat nao de bieu 16 gipng noi c6 cam xuc doi voi cac hpc sinh dupe kivpngthap.
• Giao vien se su dung thu thuat nao de bieu 16 chat lupng tuong tac voi cac hpc sinh dupe ki vpng thap?
• Giao vien eo nhan thay sy can thiet phai c6 eac thu thuat da dang trong cae hoat dpng naỷ
Ngudn: 2005, Marzano va Associates.
•514
Thay cho Idi ket
Trong cuon sach nay t6i mu6'n noi rang qua tnnh day hoc hieu qua doi hoi mot phan nghe thuat va mot phan khoa hoc. P h ^ khoa hoc cua qua trinh day hoc duoc due ket bdi nhieu thap ni6n nghien cuii, nhung nghien ciiu da cung cap cac hudng din cho cac hanh vi lam nen viec day hpc hieu qua, dong thoi cung cSip cac ki thuat cu the dupic su dung cho qua tnnh day hoc dọ Phan nghe thuat cua day hoc dupe tao nen bang nhan thuc rang cac nghien ciiru khong the nao dua ra cau tra 15i cho timg hoc sinh va moi tinh hu6ng va rang nhiing hanh vi thu6c ciing m6t loai dupe thi
hien theo nhung trinh tu khac nhau va kieu each khac nhau bcri hai giao vien khac nhau c6 the mang den nhiing ket qua khong giong nhaụ T6i hi vpng rang minh da thanh cong doi chut trong viec cung cap nhung nghien cuu cin thiet va cac goi y thuc ti6n de giiip cac giao vien mdi vao ngh6 va ca giao vien da CO kinh nghifim c6 them cac c6ng cu lam phong phii thtm
nghe thuat va khoa hoc cua viec day hpc c6 hieu quạ
Tai lieu tham khao
Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Adams, G., & Cohen. Ạ (1974). Children's physical and interpersonal characteristics that affect
student-teacher interactions. Journal of Experimental Education, 4.3, 1-5.
Alexander, P. Ạ (1984). Training analogical reasoning skills in the gifted. Roeper Review, 6(4), 191-193.
Alexander, P. Ạ, White, C. S., Haensly, P. Ạ, & Crimmins-Jeans, M . (n.d.). Training i„ analogical reasoning. Tech. Report. College Station, GA: College of Education. Texas A & M Universitỵ
Alleman, J., & Brophy, J. (1998). Strategic leaming opportunities during after-school hours. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 62(3), 10-13.
Allington, R. (1980). Teacher intermptiorr behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 311-317.
Alvermann, D. Ẹ, & Boothby, P. R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction.
Reading Psychology, 7(2), 87-100.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors ol
interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111 (2), 256-274. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive
motivational analysis, hi R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Rẹsearch on motivation in education: Vol.1. Student motivation (pp. 177-207). New York: Academic Press.
Anderman, Ẹ M., & Wolters, C. Ạ (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on studeni motivation. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychologx
(pp. 369-389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 89, 369^06. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MÁs: Harvard University Press. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Leaming and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wileỵ Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder. L. M., & Simon, H. Ạ (2000). Perspectives on leaming.
thinking, and activitỵ Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11-13.
Anderson. J. R., Reder, L. M . , & Simon. 11. Ạ (1995). Applications and misapplications ol cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Unpublished paper. Camegie Mellon University, Department of Psychologỵ Pittsburgh. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Available fi-om http://act.psỵcmụedu/personal/ja/misapplied.html.
Anderson, J. R.. Reder. L. M., & Simon, H. Ạ (1996). Situated leaming and education
Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Anderson, L., Evertson, C. & Emmer, Ẹ (1980). Dimensions in classroom management derived from recent research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12, 343-356.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl. D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cmikshank, K. Ạ, Mayer, R. Ẹ, Pintrich, F R., et al. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision <jJ
Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Anderson, V., & Hidi, S. (1988/1989). Teaching students to summarizẹ Educational Leadership 46, 26-28.
Arlin, M . (1979). Teacher transitions can disrupt time flow in classrooms. American Education Research Journal, 16, 42-56.
Armbm-ster, B. B., Anderson, T. H.. & Meyer. J. L. (1992). Improving content-area reading using instmctional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 393-416.
Armento, B. J. (1978, February). Teacher behavior and effective teaching of concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicagọ (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Nọ ED 153 949).
Aronson, Ẹ, Blaney, N., Stephan, C, Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jig.saw clas.iroom. Beverly
Hills, CA:Sagẹ 4 . , Atwood, V. Ạ, & Wilen, W. W. (1991). Wait time and effective social studies instruction: What
can research in science education tell us? Social Education, 55, 179-181.
Aubus.son, P., Foswill, S., Barr, R.. & Perkovic, L. (1997). What happens when students do simulation- role-play in sciencẹ Research in Science Education, 27(4), 565-579.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Babad, Ẹ, Inbar. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational P.sychology, 74,459-474.
Baker, W. P., & Lawson, Ạ Ẹ (1995). Effect of analogical instruction and reasoning level on achievement in general genetics. Tempẹ AZ: Department of Zoologỵ (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Nọ 390 713).
Balli, S. J. (1998). When mom and dad help: Student reflections on parent involvement with homework. Journal of Rẹsearch and Development in Education, 31(3), 142-148. i ; : > ' : Balli, S. J., Demo, D. H., & Wedman, J. F. (1998). Family involvement with children's homework:
An intervention in the miđle grades. Family Relations: Interdisciplinaiy Journal of Applied Family Studies, 47(2), 149-157.
Balli, S. J., Wedman, J. F.. & Demo, D. H. (1997 ). Family involvement with miđle grades homework: Effects of differential prompting. Journal of Experimental Education, 66( 1), 31 ^ 8 . Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Huriey, M . M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based
writing-to-leam interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of
Educational Research, 74( 1), 29-58. . . , ,;
Bangert-Drowns, R. L.; Kulik, C. C, Kulik, J. Ạ, & Morgan, M . (1991). The instmctional effects of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. Ạ, & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Effects of classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89-99.
Bariey, Z., Lauer. R Ạ. Arens, S. Ạ. Apthorp, H. S., Englert, K. S., Snow, D., & Akibạ M . (2002).
Helping at-rịsk students meet standards: A .synthesis of evidence-hạsed clas.sroom practices.
Centennial, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Leaming.
Barr, Ạ S. (1958). Characteristics of successful teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 39,282-284.
BaiTOWs, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M . (1980). Prohlem-hased learning: An approaih to medical education. New York: Springer.
Becker, W. C. (Ed.). (1988). Direct instruction: Special issuẹ Education and Treatment of Children, ll,297--i02. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Beez, W. (1968). Influence of biased psychological reports on teacher behavior and pupji performance (Summary). Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 3,605-606.
Bennett, N., & Desforges. C. (1988). Matching classroom tasks to students' attainments.
Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 221 -234.
Bennett. W. J., Finn, C. Ẹ, & Cribb, J. T. Ẹ (1999). The educated child: A parent's guide fron^ preschool through eighth gradẹ New Yoric: Free Press.
Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagoguẹ Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5-13. Berman, S. (2001). Thinking in context: Teaching for open-mindedness and critical understanding.
In Ạ L. Cbsta (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource hook for teaching thinking (pp. 11-17). Alexandria, V A: Association for Supervision and (Turriculum Development.
. Bettencourt, Ẹ M., Gillett, M. H., Gall, M. D., & Hull, R. Ẹ (1983). Effects of teacher enthusiasm training on student on-task behavior and achievement. American Educational Reseanh training on student on-task behavior and achievement. American Educational Reseanh journal, 20(3), 435^50.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom leaming. As.ses.sment in Education,
5(1), 7-75.
Blakey, M . (1970). The relationship between teacher prophesy and teacher verbal behavior and their effect upon adult student achievement. Dissertation Ah.stracts International, 31, 4615Ạ
(UMIN0.4615A).
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and .school learning New York: McGraw-Hill. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for methods of group insUiiction as effective as one-to-one
tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-18.
Blumenfeld, P. C, & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students' involvemeiii and use of leaming strategies in sciencẹ Elementary School journal, 88(3), 235-250.
Boud, D. (1987). Problem-bạsed leaming in perspectivẹ In D. Bond (Ed.), Prohlem-hased leaming in education for the professions (pp. 13-18). Sydney: Higher Education Research ami Development Society of Australiạ
Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative review of cooperative leaming effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 116-119.
Brandt. R. (1998). Powetful learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and (Turriculum Development.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson. M . K. (1973). Cbnsiderations of some problems of comprehension. In
W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383^38). New Yoric: Academic Press. Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & Crcton, H. Ạ (1990). A study of student perceptions of physics Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & Crcton, H. Ạ (1990). A study of student perceptions of physics
teacher behavior. Journal ofRẹsearch in Science Teaching, 27, 335, 350.
Broadhurst, Ạ, & Darnell, D. (1965). An introduction to cybernetics and information theory
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 51,442^53. 218
s, J. G., & Brooks, M . G. (1999). In .search of understanding: The case for the constructivịst classroom. Alexandriạ VA: Association for Supervision and (Curriculum Development. classroom. Alexandriạ VA: Association for Supervision and (Curriculum Development.
Brooks. J. G., & Brooks, M . G. (2001). Becoming a constnjctivist teacher. In Ạ L. Cọsta (Ed.),
Developing minds: A rẹsource hook for teaching thinking (3rd ed., pp. 150-157). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-.student relation.ships: Causes and comequences.
New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. ^ Brophy, J. Ẹ (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research,
51,5-32.
Brophy, J. Ẹ (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631-661. • (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Brophy, J. Ẹ (1996). Teaching prohlem students. New York: Guilford.
Brophy, J. Ẹ (2006). History of research in classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handhook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary
is.sues (pp. 3-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brophy, J. Ẹ, & Evertson, C. M . (1976). Leaming from teaching: A developmental perspectivẹ
Boston: AUyn & Bacon.
Brophy, J. Ẹ, & Good, T. L. (1970). Teacher's communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral datạ Journal of Educational Psychology,
61 (5), 365-374.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Sc:ience, 2, 155-192
Bmer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Clambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bluer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16. • , . , Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given. New York: W. W. Norton.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and .self-regulated leaming: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
Caffyn, R. Ẹ (1989). Attitudes of British secondary school teachers and pupils to rewards and punịshments. Educational Research, 31, 210-220.
Cahill, L., Gorski, L., & Lee, K. (2003). Enhanced human memory consolidation with post leaming stress: Interactions with the degree of arousal at encoding. Learning and Memory,
10(4), 270-274.
Cahill, L., Prins, B., Weber, M . , & McGaugh, J. (1994). Adrenergic activation and memory of emotional events. Nature, 371(6399), 702-704.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human hrain.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R. N., & Came, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibilitỵ Alexandriạ VA: Association for Supervision and (Curriculum Development.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
Carr, Ẹ G., & Durand, V. M . (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication \rammg. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18,111-126.