1. John David Barrow, Nghịch lý thị giác, in trong Điều bất khả, giới hạn của khoa học & khoa học của giới hạn, Diệp Minh Tâm dịch, Nxb Tri thức 2012.
2. Lê Huy Bắc, Văn học hậu hiện đại – Lý thuyết và tiếp nhận, NXB.Đại học Sư phạm, Hà Nội
3. Tim O‟Brien, Những thứ họ mang, Trần Tiễn Cao Đăng dịch, NXB.Văn học, Hà Nội, 2011.
4. Phương Lựu, Lý thuyết văn học hậu hiện đại, NXB. Đại học Sư phạm, Hà Nội, 2012.
5. Lộc Phương Thủy (chủ biên), Lý luận phê bình văn học thế giới thế kỉ XX, NXB. Giáo dục, Hà Nội, 2007.
6. Trung tâm Văn hóa Đông Tây, Văn học hậu hiện đại thế giới – Những vấn đề lý thuyết, NXB. Hội nhà văn, Hà Nội, 2003.
B. Tiếng Anh
7. Georges Van Den Abbeele (trans.), The Differend: Phrases in Dispute
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Lyotard, 1988.
8. Michael Agar, The Postmodern link between academia and practice.
RSS Feed National Association for the Practice of Anthropology Bulletin, 1997.
Nguyễn Hoàng Cúc – Cao học Văn K56 Page 86
and the power of ideas: a review essay. American Anthropologist, 2008. 10. Christopher Butler, A Very Short Introduction to Postmodernism, 2003. 11. Paul Erickson và Liam Murphy, A History of Anthropological Theory.
3rd Ed. Toronton: University of Toronto Press, 2010.
12. Greenfield, What Psychology can do for anthropology, or why anthropology took postmodernism on the chin, American Anthropologist, 2000.
13. Marvin Harris, Theories of Culture in Postmodern Times. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira, 1999.
14. Lawrence Kuznar, Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology. Lanham, MD: Altamira, 2008.
15. Matthew Johnson, Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd Ed. Wiley–Blackwell, 2010.
16. Scott Lash, Sociology of Postmodernism. London: Routledge. 1990 17. Bruno Latour, The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard,
1988.
18. Jean–François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1984. 19. Jean–François Lyotard, The Postmodern Explained. Sidney: Power
Publications, 1992.
20. George Marcus và Michael Fischer, Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Nguyễn Hoàng Cúc – Cao học Văn K56 Page 87 21. McKinley, Postmodernism certainly is not science, but could it be
religion? CSAS Bulletin, 2000.
22. Kant, Critique of Judgment, Werner S. Pluhar (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.
23. Frederick Lawrence (trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 24. Tim O‟Brien, The things they carried, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Publishing Company, New York, The USA, 2009.
25. Isaac Reed, Epistemology Contextualized: Social–Scientific Knowledge in a Postpositivist Era, Sociological Theory, 2010.
26. Pauline Roseneau, Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, 1993. 27. Madan Sarup, An Introductory Guide to Post–Structuralism and
Postmodernism. Atlanta: University of Georgia Press, 1993.
28. Nancy Scheper–Hughe (1995), The Primacy of the Ethical. Current Anthropology.
29. Melford Spiro, Cultural Relativism and the Future of Anthropology. Rereading Cultural Anthropology, Durham: Duke University Press, 1992.
30. Melford Spiro, Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Science. A Modernist Critique. Comparative Studies in Society and History.
1996.
31. Keith Tester, The Life and Times of Postmodernity. London: Routledge, 1993.
Nguyễn Hoàng Cúc – Cao học Văn K56 Page 88 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
33. Bryan S. Turner, Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. London: SAGE Publications, 1990.
34. Wilce, Traditional laments and postmodern regrets. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2005.
35. Robert Winthrop, Dictionary of Concepts in Cultural Anthropology. New York: Greenwood Press, 1991.
36. Godzich Wlad (trans.), Just Gaming, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
37. Patricia Waugh. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self– Conscious Fiction. NY: Routledge, 1984
38. (Encyclopedia Universalis Vol.15, Paris: Encyclopaedia Universalis, 1973, Theory of the text, trans. Ian Macleod. Ed. Robert Young. Boston/London: Routledge, 1981.
39. The structure of the artistic text, University of Michigan.