2.7. THỜI GIAN ĐÔNG MAU
2.7.4. THỜI GIAN ĐÔNG MÁU Ở CÁC NGHIỆM THỨC VÀ MÓC THỜI
GIAN THƯ NGHIỆM
Thống kê ANOVA
Table An20/2# THO! GIAN DONG MAU
Teo‹svay RM ANODE Marching: Scacted
Assume spterctty? No
Ai oo
Source of Variation * of loll variation P value P value summary Significant? Geisser-Greenhouse's psa
Thài gian x Nghiệm “ác. 1479 <‹00001 | ==" Yes
Thời gia, 2179 ‹0001 .~—= Yes 0.8000
Nghiệm thío 344 2.0001 | **** Yes io 187 oo ^° Yes
ANOVA table 3s or us F (DFn, OF d) P value
Thẻ: gan x Nghướn Sao 1.011 t9 9.1011 F (10, $8) = 9.724 Pe0.0001 Thài giao. +2” 2 1.181 F (1733 83 18) = 93 9 | Pc0 0391
Nghiệm thỏo 3.423 5 0.0645 Fỉ 48) = 19.11 P<0 031 ID 1.720 od 0.06983 F (43, ) = 1211 Psộ 020
Rts2vx' 1.772 * 991949
Oata sumenary
Natyb&t of colartrá (Nghe thúc) 6
Number of sows (Thôi gas) 3
Neenber of subsets (1D) “
Number of missing values 9
Kết quả thé hiện sự khác biệt về thời gian đông máu trung bình giữa các nghiệm
thức (kiêm định Tukey)
cme
X61 - G
om
ô Toe
* Twat
* Tuo
tT
at
ot
ý vy¿t¿t+‡t|
PL24
3.1.2. Xử lí 1 yếu tố
Ia3%© A£2/24đ
Dan set ana/2v2
ANOVA semmmary F
Psaut
P sat summary
Sign fant #2 3mcog means @ < 0.05)?
Raquared
Brown Forsythe 1441
F ©tn 0F4) Pee
P eae suTimary
Art SOs shpeiconty 29"est (P < 0.05)?
Ractiver’s test
Bartetis statetic (come ctec}
Pee
Pee summary
Are SOs sigticacty Stterert (P< 2 0272
ANOWA table
Treatment (ceiwees columns) Re?!đz3l (wihin columns)
Total
Dots surresar/
Number of treatmeets (columns)
Number of values (iota!)
ass 0.0185
06334
04924 (5, 12) 0793+
ns
Ne
ss L2
0.003428
0.001933 42 0095351 lar
=
6 18
3.1.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiplecomparisons test Mean Dift. %500%Clofđi.
ĐC vs Cd OC vs. Các OC vs. Cast ĐC vs.Cđ92
ĐCvs C493 Cdvs Cac
Cdvs CZS1 Cdvz_CđS2 Cdvz Cđ53
CoC v2 Cd31
CúC vs. C32 Cac vs. CdS3 CaS1 vs, CoS2
C091 vs. CoS3 COS2 vs. C0S3
'
MS
00029854 00021611
|
|
|
0.04000 -00748112-0005189 Yes 0.01667 | -0.05148100.01814 No
0.02333 -0.05814%00.01148 No 4001667 -005148920/01014 No 0.000 2 -0034812003481 No 002333 -001148I0005914 - No 0.01667 -00181412005149 No 00233 -0011⁄49to00591⁄4 Ho 004000 000%189to007481 Yez
:0 006667 | 004148 %2 0 02814 | No 0000 -00348112002481 No 0.01667 -00181432005143 No 0008867 -00281432004148 No
00233 -0011⁄4810005814 No 001887 -001814!2005148 No
-Pvalue
|F n,0fđ| |
lẫ& 12244255 .Pz00185
Summary AđjustedPValue
° 0.0215 ns 09087
Ins 02840 '88 0.9087 Ins >0 99998 ins 02840 'ng 06087 'ng 02840 š 09218 las 0.9850 ins 70.9999
ns 06987 ns 0.9850 ns 02840 ns 09087
PL25
3.2. BILIRUNBIN D
3.2.1. Số liệu thô
3.2.2. Xử lí 1 yếu tố
Table Analy2ed' “Bilirubin ©
Dats sets anslyzed AF |
ANOVA surnmary | F 2096 |
Pvanze ô00091
P vakke summary — |
Signiicant cet. amang means (P < 0.05)? Yes |
R.sqzsred 04973 |
Brown-Forsythe test |
F (DF+. DFớ) 433306.12) |
Pvanze 03149
P vale summary ns | Are SDs significantly đflererf (P < 0 05}? No |
ĐèrUeft'4 test |
Bar1efs statiste (corrected) |
Phe | P vale summary |
Are $Da 4i05̧carf; đflatarf (P < 0.05)? |
ANOWA tat9e ss 0 Ms . I0®,Đ4) Pvalue
Tre ðn erd (between columns) 0002911 5 00006822 .F($ 12) = 20.06 P‹<ô 0921
Residual (aÄPán celu n2) 000034333 12 2770a005 `
Total 0003244 17
Data summery
Number of reatments (columns) 6 | Number of values (otal) 8
3.2.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiple comparisons test Mean Diff, 95.00% Ct of diff. Below threshoks? | Summary | Adjusted P Value
OC ws. Ca -003887 -00511210-002221 Yes | eee | ô0.0001 OC vs. CoC -001687 — -0.03112to-0.002212 Yes | | 0.0210
OC vs. Cđ$1 -0.006667 -0.02112to 0.007788 No ins | 0.6426 OC vs. Cđ$2 -0.006467 -0.02112t0 0.007788 No ins 0.6426
OC vs. CđS3 0.000 -00144510001445 No Ins '>0.9899
€6x3.CáC 0.02000 0005546920034456 Yes Š | 0.0087 Covs. Cost 0.03000 0015559004445 Yes . | 0.0002 Cove. CéS2 0.03000 0015551%%004445 — Yes . | 0.0002 Céxs.CcS3 003867 0022210200512 Yez .— | <0,0001 Cec vz. C2S1 0.01000 -0094454t0002445 No ‘ns (0.2666 CoC vs. Cđ$2 0.01000 -0094454t0002445 No ns (0.2666 CoC vs. C453 0.01667 0002212003112 Yez š HH
Cd91+z.Cd92 0.000 0.01448100.01448 No ins | >0.9999
CeSt vs. C483 0.006667 -0.007788100.02112 No ins | 0.6426
CdS2 vs. CdS3 0.006667 0097788 to 002112 No ins 08626
PL26
3.3.2 mm lil yéu nthTattle Angiyzed Birubnl
Dats sats 304/292 af |
ANOVA semmary |
F 06307
Pvaue 95177 |
P vale sem.mary =
Significant đŸ. among means (P < 0.05)? No
Reqeeed 9270 |
Brown Forsythe test
F (DFn, OF a) 0.4024 (5, 12) | | |
Pvaue 0.7831
Pvale semmary es
Are S08 sigrtt canth cetecort @ <0.05)? NÓ |
Bare% 6 tort |
Ba⁄1ctf4 statistic (CC(t&cte3) Pvaue
P vạhue semmary
Are SOs sigrificantly aeterert @ < 0.05)? | | VV ING
ANOVA table ss oF MS F IDEN, DFS) Pvaue
Trestment (betaeen columns) 00007167 5 0.0001433 F(5 12)=09897 P=0.5177 Residual (witin columns) 0.001933 12 0.0001611
Total 0.002650 7 |
Data se0sesa£y |
Numb& of treatments (coharnins) 6 |
Humber of values (total) 16 | 3.3.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiple comparisons test Mean Diff. 95.00%Clofđãf. “Below threshold? Summary Adjusted P Value
OCvs.Ca -0003333 | -0.03814100.03148 No ng 0.9994 OC vs. Coc 0.000 |-003481420023461 No ns 30.9999 ĐCvs CđS1 -001667 |-00514810001814 No ns 0.6087 OC vs. Cas2 -0.01000 |-0.04481100.02481 No ng 09206
ĐCvz.Cd93 0.000 |-00349112003401 No ns 20,9999 Cavs. CoC 0003333 | -0.03148100.03814 No ng 0.9994 Cavs. Ces1 0.01333 |-0.04814100.02148 No ns 0.7888 Cavs. CớS2 -0006657 | -0.04148100.02814 No ns 0.9850 Cavs. Ces3 0003333 |-00314810003814 No ng 09894 CaO vs, CdS1 0.01667 |-0.05148100.01614 No nz 0.6087 CóC vs. CdS2 -0.01000 |-00448110002481 No ng 0.9206 Cဠvs. C493 0.000 |-003481420.023401 No ns 20.9999
CaS1 vs.Cđ92 0006567 |-0028141o004148 No ns 09850 CđS1s.CđS3 001687 |-00181410005148 No ns 0.6087 C4S2vz.CdS3 0.01000 |-00249112004481 No nz 0.9206
3.4. AST
3.4.1. Số liệu thô
3.4.2. Xử lí 1 yếu tố
Ts(e Ansyzed
Data sets 252l/2e2
ANOVA summary
F
Pvaue
Ð value suenmsry
Significant di¥, among means (P < 0.05)?
R squared
Brown Forsythe test F (DF, OF d)
Pvaiue
P value summary
Are SDs significantly diferent (P < 0.05)?
Barmer's west
Bartlett's statistic (corrected) Pvaiue
P value suenmary
Ara SDs significantly different (P < 0.05)7
ANOVA lable
Treaiment (cetween columns) Residual (athin columns)
Total
Date summary
Number of treatments (oolumns)
Number of values (total)
0.0001
1.505 (5, 12) 0.2896
2319 Ssã8”s M$76077193.3 F (Of, F 6, 12) OF a)= 3936 P<0 0001P value
PL28
3.4.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiple comparisons test ĐCvs Cđ
ĐCvs Cae ĐC vz C491 OC vs C4S2 ĐC vs. Cas3
Cd vs. Coc C4vs Cđ31 C4v¿, Cđ92
Cdvs Cd33 CaCvz CdS1 Cac ws. C492 CáC vs. C4S3 C4S1 vs C4S2 C4S1 vs. CđS3 C452 vs C453
3.5. ALT
3.5.1. Số liệu thô
ANOVA summary F
Pvalue
Pvaluo sœnina/
Significant cif, among means (P < 0.05)?
Raquared
Broan t orsythe test
F @£n, œ4) Prue
P value sammary
Are SOs significantly dierent (P < 0.05)?
Bartioct's test
Đartlef$ statistic (C0(rec92ỉ)
Pvaue
P value se~rmewrr
Are SOs signiticaniy đWferent 0P < 0.05)?
Mean Diff, | 95.00% Ci of ditt.
A454
“164 104.4 -1875 -41.38 330.3 3423 258.9 4050 1200 -71.37 7473 83.37
62.73
146.1
484.5 to -408.3
~154 2 to -77.98 142.2 to -65 98 -226.6 to -149.4
~79.51 to -3.262 292 11o 368 4
304 1 10 380 4 229081029709
366 9 1o 443 1
~26.13 to %0.13
~109 5 to -3324 38 60 to 112.9
~121.5 to -45 24 24 60 to 100.9
108.0 to 184 2
3048
<0 0001
09322
4.406 (5, 12) 02900
ns
No
Below threshold?
Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Summary Adjusted P Value
BE ESR EEE a ad ô0 0001<0 0001003090.88900.00040.00030.00010.00140.0001<0.00010.0001<0 0001<0 00010.00010.0001
PL29
ANOVA table ss | OF MS | F @fa, OF a) Pvalue
Tregoael (between columns) 9⁄4 is 1260 IF(6.120~3940 Pô00001
Residual (within ooumns) 49.97 12 6.168
Tota 6396 | 17 | |
| |
Number of Y&atrsente (Cohen) 6 | |
Number of values (ota!) 18
3.5.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiple comparisons test Mean Diff, 95.00% Clof diff. Belowthroshoid? Summary Adjusted P Value
OC vs. Ce -53 11 -EÐ71to-4752 Yes .... '<0.0004
OC vs. Cac 8.977 | -14.57t0-3380 Yes “ 0.0017
Cvs. Cast 2525 -3085to-1966 Yes oe 's0 0004 OC vs. CéS2 -20.90 -26.4910-15.20 Yes ease '<0 0001
ĐC vs. Cơ83 2413 -3.183t08.010 No ns 0.6999 Cdvz cdc 4444 3854104973 Yes .... .<0 0094 Cavs. CộS1 27.86 22264033486 — Yes oo | ô0.0001 Cavs. Cas2 32.22 26.621037.81 Yes pane | <0.0001 Cdvs Cd83 55 53 4993106142 Yes .... .<0 0094
CoC vs. CđS1 1628 -2197t0-10898 Yes oo ô0.0001
CoC vs. Cas2 41.92 -417.52to-6324 Yes " 00001
CóCvz Cd93 1139 $.7941016.99 Yes .. 0.0002 Cđ$1vs.Cđ$2 4357 -1.240109.953 No ns (0.1688
CeS1¥s. C683 27.67 22.071033.26 — Yes pane ' x0 0004
Cđ92vz.Cđ93 2331 177102891 Yez = | <0.9001
3.6. Urea
3.6.2. Xử lí 1 yếu tố
Tabi Analzed
Data Sts anal/29đ
ANOVA summary
F
Pxvsue
Pvst/e summary
Signficart aff. among means (P < 0.06)?
R squared
Brown Forsyte test
F(D£fa OF c)
P value
P value sermmmnasy
Ate SOs Segniicanty Atarent (P < 0 0Š?
_ Barteat's tat
Dartlet's statstc (comrected)
Pveue
P vaiue turenry
Ae SDs pignticanty aterent (P < 0 0672 ANOVA table
Traatment (between columns) Resiaual (within columns)
Totst
Data semenary
Number of reatments (columns) Number of values (total)
ay
PL30
1164
“00001
Yes
09798
08579. 12) 05359
tá
No
ss OF 78.00
1609 12
79.61 v7
wu
6 18
3.6.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's multiple comparisons test Mean Diff.
ĐCvs Ca OC ws. Cac OC vs. CaS1 OC ws. CaS2
ĐCvs CaS3 Cdvs. CdC
Cdvs.CdS1 Cdvs. C092
Cdvs. Cd93 CdC vs. CdS1
CAC vs. Cd52 CAC vs. CIS3 CdS1 vs. Cd$2
€4S1vz C4S3 CdS2 vs. CdS3
6.650
~5.117 -đ.577 -5.0S7
“5 180 1533 2073 1583 4470
05400 0 06000 -0.06333 0.4800
0.6033 0.1233
95.00% Ci of điff.
+7 654 to -5 646
+6. 121 to -4 142
~E.S81 to -3 572 -6.061 to -4 052 +6 184 to -4 176 0.5291 to 2 538 1.069 to 3078 (0.5891 to 2.598 0.4658 tọ 2 474 0.4642 to 1544 -0.9442 to 1.064
~1.068 to 0.9409 -1484 to 0 5242 -1.608 to 0.4009
~1.128 to 0.8809
ms 1560
01341
555ã5558ấ0 th eee BE i
F (Dfa, OF d) Pvaue
F (5, 12) 1164 P<00001
Adjusted P Value
<0 0001
<0.0001
“0.0001
.... x0 0001
= <0 0001
0.0026
0.0002 0.0019 0.0037 0.4987
>0.9899
>0 9899 06103 03987 0.9981
‡
‡
3.7. Creatinine
3.7.1. Số liệu thô
0,25
PL31
0,27 0,24 0,24
0,26 0,24 0,23
3.7.2. Xử lí 1 yếu tố
Table Analyzec
Dana 2692 analaed
ANOVA summary F
Pvakes
P vale summary
Signticant ci among means (P < 0.05)?
R squared
Browns orsythe test F (DFn. DFG)
Pyvowe
Pvalze summary
Ace SOs significantly dfferert (P < 0.05)?
Bartlett's test
Bardots statistic (corrected) Pvake
Pvalse summary
Ace SOs significantly dfferert (P < 0.05)?
ANOVA tatie
Troatment (between columns) Residual (within columns)
Total
Data summary
Number of reatments (columns) Number of values (ots!)
0,28
Crewinine
1115 90004
Yes
90220
99111 (6, 12) 95056
ns
No
3.7.3. So sánh giữa các nghiệm thức
Tukey's maitiple comparisoms test ЀCvz.Cd
ĐCvs cac Đ€vs.Cd$1 OC vs. C0S2
BC vs CdS3 Cdva CoC Cdvs. CdS1 Cdvz CdS2 Cavs. CaS3
CódC vs. CdSt COC vs. C0S2 CIC vs. CdS3
CdS1 va. CaS2
CdS1 vs. Cas3 CdS2 vs. CaS3
Mean DIft.
0.01333 0.01000
0.008667 0.04667
0.02000 0.003333 0.006667 0.03333 0.006667
0.003333 0.03667 0.01000
004000 001333 0.02667
95.00% Cl of ditt.
| |
0.008974 to 0.02666
‡ }
~0.01331 to 0.03331
| }
-0.01664 to 0.02997
| |
0.02336 to 0.06997
| |
~0 003397 12 0 04331
~0 02694 to 0 01997 +0.02997 to 0.01664
| }
0.01003 to 0.05664
+ ‡
~0.0182.4 to 0.02997
| }
-0.02864 to 0.01997
+ }
0.01336 to 0.05997
| |
0.01331 to 0.03331
0.01669 to 006331 +0.008974 to 0.03654
| |
+0.04897 to -0 003359
0,24
MS
0.0906056 7222e-005
Below threshold?
No No No Yes
No No No
0,23
F in, DEd)
F (5, 92) = 11.45
| 0.7039
0.0221
t ¥ ý P value P20.0004
Adjusted P Value 0.4351
0.7039
0.9219 0.0002
0.1095 0.9960 0.9219 0.0044 0.9219 0.9960 0.0021
0.0010 04351
PL32