| Tài liệu tham khảo |
Loại |
Chi tiết |
| 17. Daily và Dalton, 1995. CEO and director turnover in failing firms: an illusion of change? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 393-400 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
CEO and director turnover in failing firms: an illusion ofchange |
|
| 18. Dalton và Dalton, 2005. Board of directors: utilizing empirical evidence in developing practical prescriptions. British Journal of Management, Vol. 16 No.1, pp. 91-7 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Board of directors: utilizing empirical evidence indeveloping practical prescriptions |
|
| 19. Ehikioya, 2009. Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231-243. doi: 10.1108/14720700910964307 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Corporate governance structure and firm performance indeveloping economies: evidence from Nigeria |
|
| 20. Eisenberg và cộng sự, 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics vol. 48: pp. 35-54 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Larger board size and decreasing firm value insmall firms |
|
| 21. Fama và Jensen, 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law andEconomics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 301-25 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Separation of ownership and control |
|
| 22. Frick và Bermig, 2010. Board Size, Board Composition and Firm Performance:Empirical Evidence from Germany |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Board Size, Board Composition and Firm Performance |
|
| 23. Grossman và Hart, 1982. Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. The Economics of Uncertainty and Information, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Corporate financial structure and managerialincentives |
|
| 24. Gupta, 2005. Partial privatization and firm performance. Journal of Finance, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 987-1015 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Partial privatization and firm performance |
|
| 25. Harold và Lehn, 1985. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes andConsequences |
|
| 26. Heugens và cộng sự, 2008. Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3) |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firmperformance in Asia: Towards a more fine grained understanding |
|
| 27. Jensen và Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3,1976 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, Agencycosts and ownership structure |
|
| 28. Kaplan và Minton, 1994. Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards:determinants and implications for managers. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 225-58 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards:"determinants and implications for managers |
|
| 29. Klapper và Love, 2004. Corporate governance, investor protection and performance inemerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 703-28 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Corporate governance, investor protection andperformance inemerging markets |
|
| 31. Lam và Lee, 2008. CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from Hong Kong. Corporate Governance, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 299-316 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from HongKong |
|
| 32. Liang, 2009. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in an Emerging Market: the Moderating Role of Social Networks. Contemporary Management Research, 5(2), 201-212 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in an EmergingMarket: the Moderating Role of Social Networks |
|
| 33. Lin, 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 159-84 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets |
|
| 34. Ma và Tian, 2009. Board Composition, Board Activity and Ownership Concentration, the Impact on Firm Performance. Asian Finance, 1-51 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Board Composition, Board Activity and OwnershipConcentration, the Impact on Firm Performance |
|
| 35. Mak và Kusnadi, 2005. Size really matters: further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 301-18 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Size really matters: further evidence on the negativerelationship between board size and firm value |
|
| 36. Nam và Nam, 2004. Corporate Governance in Asia: Recent Evidence from Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. Asian Development Bank Institute, Manila |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Corporate Governance in Asia: Recent Evidence fromIndonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand |
|
| 37. Pfeffer, 1972. Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors, a study of organization environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 349-64 |
Sách, tạp chí |
| Tiêu đề: |
Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors, astudy of organization environment |
|