Tài liệu Bài 3: Gradients and Optimization Methods ppt

3 Gradients and Optimization Methods The main task in the independent component analysis (ICA) problem, formulated in Chapter 1, is to estimate a separating matrix W that will give us the independent components. It also became clear that W cannot generally be solved in closed form, that is, we cannot write it as some function of the sample or training set, whose value could be directly evaluated. Instead, the solution method is based on cost functions, also called objective functions or contrast functions. Solutions W to ICA are found at the minima or maxima of these functions. Several possible ICA cost functions will be given and discussed in detail in Parts II and III of this book. In general, statistical estimation is largely based on optimization of cost or objective functions, as will be seen in Chapter 4. Minimization of multivariate functions, possibly under some constraints on the solutions, is the subject of optimization theory. In this chapter, we discuss some typical iterative optimization algorithms and their properties. Mostly, the algorithms are based on the gradients of the cost functions. Therefore, vector and matrix gradients are reviewed first, followed by the most typical ways to solve unconstrained and constrained optimization problems with gradient-type learning algorithms. 3.1 VECTOR AND MATRIX GRADIENTS 3.1.1 Vector gradient Consider a scalar valued function g of m variables g = g (w 1 :::w m )=g (w) 57 Independent Component Analysis. Aapo Hyv ¨ arinen, Juha Karhunen, Erkki Oja Copyright  2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-40540-X (Hardback); 0-471-22131-7 (Electronic) 58 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS where we have used the notation w =(w 1 :::w m ) T . By convention, we define w as a column vector. Assuming the function g is differentiable, its vector gradient with respect to w is the m -dimensional column vector of partial derivatives @g @ w = 0 B @ @g @w 1 . . . @g @w m 1 C A (3.1) The notation @g @ w is just shorthand for the gradient; it should be understood that it does not imply any kind of division by a vector, which is not a well-defined concept. Another commonly used notation would be rg or r w g . In some iteration methods, we have also reason to use second-order gradients. We define the second-order gradient of a function g with respect to w as @ 2 g @ w 2 = 0 B B @ @ 2 g @w 2 1 ::: @ 2 g @w 1 w m . . . . . . @ 2 g @w m w 1 ::: @ 2 g @w 2 m 1 C C A (3.2) This is an m  m matrix whose elements are second order partial derivatives. It is called the Hessian matrix of the function g (w) . It is easy to see that it is always symmetric. These concepts generalize to vector-valued functions; this means an n -element vector g(w)= 0 B @ g 1 (w) . . . g n (w) 1 C A (3.3) whose elements g i (w) are themselves functions of w .TheJacobian matrix of g with respect to w is @ g @ w = 0 B @ @g 1 @w 1 ::: @g n @w 1 . . . . . . @g 1 @w m ::: @g n @w m 1 C A (3.4) Thus the i th column of the Jacobian matrix is the gradient vector of g i (w) with respect to w . The Jacobian matrix is sometimes denoted by J g . For computing the gradients of products and quotients of functions, as well as of composite functions, the same rules apply as for ordinary functions of one variable. VECTOR AND MATRIX GRADIENTS 59 Thus @f (w)g (w) @ w = @f (w) @ w g (w)+f (w) @g(w) @ w (3.5) @f (w)=g (w) @ w =  @f (w) @ w g (w)  f (w) @g(w) @ w ]=g 2 (w) (3.6) @f (g (w)) @ w = f 0 (g (w)) @g(w) @ w (3.7) The gradient of the composite function f (g (w)) can be generalized to any number of nested functions, giving the same chain rule of differentiation that is valid for functions of one variable. 3.1.2 Matrix gradient In many of the algorithms encountered in this book, we have to consider scalar-valued functions g of the elements of an m  n matrix W =(w ij ) : g = g (W)=g(w 11 :::w ij  ::: w mn ) (3.8) A typical function of this kind is the determinant of W . Of course, any matrix can be trivially represented as a vector by scanning the elements row by row into a vector and reindexing. Thus, when considering the gradient of g with respect to the matrix elements, it would suffice to use the notion of vector gradient reviewed earlier. However, using the separate concept of matrix gradient gives some advantages in terms of a simplified notation and sometimes intuitively appealing results. In analogy with the vector gradient, the matrix gradient means a matrix of the same size m  n as matrix W , whose ij th element is the partial derivative of g with respect to w ij . Formally we can write @g @ W = 0 B @ @g @w 11 ::: @g @w 1n . . . . . . @g @w m1 ::: @g @w mn 1 C A (3.9) Again, the notation @g @ W is just shorthand for the matrix gradient. Let us look next at some examples on vector and matrix gradients. The formulas presented in these examples will be frequently needed later in this book. 3.1.3 Examples of gradients Example 3.1 Consider the simple linear functional of w , or inner product g (w)= m X i=1 a i w i = a T w 60 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS where a =(a 1 :::a m ) T is a constant vector. The gradient is, according to (3.1), @g @ w = 0 B @ a 1 . . . a m 1 C A (3.10) which is the vector a . We can write @ a T w @ w = a Because the gradient is constant (independent of w ), the Hessian matrix of g (w)= a T w is zero. Example 3.2 Next consider the quadratic form g (w)=w T Aw = m X i=1 m X j =1 w i w j a ij (3.11) where A =(a ij ) is a square m  m matrix. We have @g @ w = 0 B @ P m j =1 w j a 1j + P m i=1 w i a i1 . . . P m j =1 w j a mj + P m i=1 w i a im 1 C A (3.12) which is equal to the vector Aw + A T w .So, @ w T Aw @ w = Aw + A T w For symmetric A , this becomes 2Aw . The second-order gradient or Hessian becomes @ 2 w T Aw @ w 2 = 0 B @ 2a 11 ::: a 1m + a m1 . . . . . . a m1 + a 1m ::: 2a mm 1 C A (3.13) which is equal to the matrix A + A T .If A is symmetric, then the Hessian of w T Aw is equal to 2A . Example 3.3 For the quadratic form (3.11), we might quite as well take the gradient with respect to A , assuming now that w is a constant vector. Then @ w T Aw @a ij = w i w j . Compiling this into matrix form, we notice that the matrix gradient is the m  m matrix ww T . Example 3.4 In some ICA models, we must compute the matrix gradient of the determinant of a matrix. The determinant is a scalar function of the matrix elements VECTOR AND MATRIX GRADIENTS 61 consisting of multiplications and summations, and therefore its partial derivatives are relatively simple to compute. Let us prove the following: If W is an invertible square m  m matrix whose determinant is denoted det W ,then @ @ W det W =(W T ) 1 det W: (3.14) This is a good example for showing that a compact formula is obtained using the matrix gradient; if W were stacked into a long vector, and only the vector gradient were used, this result could not be expressed so simply. Instead of starting from scratch, we employ a well-known result from matrix algebra (see, e.g., [159]), stating that the inverse of a matrix W is obtained as W 1 = 1 det W adj (W) (3.15) with adj (W) the so-called adjoint of W . The adjoint is the matrix adj (W)= 0 @ W 11 ::: W n1 W 1n ::: W nn 1 A (3.16) where the scalar numbers W ij are the so-called cofactors. The cofactor W ij is obtained by first taking the (n  1)  (n  1) submatrix of W that remains when the i th row and j th column are removed, then computing the determinant of this submatrix, and finally multiplying by (1) i+j . The determinant det W can also be expressed in terms of the cofactors: det W = n X k=1 w ik W ik (3.17) Row i can be any row, and the result is always the same. In the cofactors W ik , none of the matrix elements of the i th row appear, so the determinant is a linear function of these elements. Taking now a partial derivative of (3.17) with respect to one of the elements, say, w ij ,gives @ det W @w ij = W ij By definitions (3.9) and (3.16), this implies directly that @ det W @ W = adj (W) T But adj (W) T is equal to (det W)(W T ) 1 by (3.15), so we have shown our result (3.14). This also implies that @ log j det Wj @ W = 1 j det Wj @ j det Wj @ W =(W T ) 1 (3.18) see (3.15). This is an example of the matrix gradient of a composite function consisting of the log , absolute value, and det functions. This result will be needed when the ICA problem is solved by maximum likelihood estimation in Chapter 9. 62 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS 3.1.4 Taylor series expansions of multivariate functions In deriving some of the gradient type learning algorithms, we have to resort to Taylor series expansions of multivariate functions. In analogy with the well-known Taylor series expansion of a function g (w) of a scalar variable w , g (w 0 )=g (w)+ dg dw (w 0  w)+1=2 d 2 g dw 2 (w 0  w) 2 + ::: (3.19) we can do a similar expansion for a function g (w)=g (w 1 :::w m ) of m variables. We h ave g (w 0 )=g (w)+( @g @ w ) T (w 0  w)+1=2(w 0  w) T @ 2 g @ w 2 (w 0  w)+::: (3.20) where the derivatives are evaluated at the point w . The second term is the inner product of the gradient vector with the vector w 0  w , and the third term is a quadratic form with the symmetric Hessian matrix @ 2 g @ w 2 . The truncation error depends on the distance kw 0  wk ; the distance has to be small, if g (w 0 ) is approximated using only the first- and second-order terms. The same expansion can be made for a scalar function of a matrix variable. The second order term already becomes complicated because the second order gradient is a four-dimensional tensor. But we can easily extend the first order term in (3.20), the inner product of the gradient with the vector w 0  w , to the matrix case. Remember that the vector inner product is defined as ( @g @ w ) T (w 0  w)= m X i=1 ( @g @ w ) i (w 0 i  w i ) For the matrix case, this must become the sum P m i=1 P m j =1 ( @g @ W ) ij (w 0 ij  w ij ): This is the sum of the products of corresponding elements, just like in the vectorial inner product. This can be nicely presented in matrix form when we remember that for any two matrices, say, A and B , trace (A T B)= m X i=1 (A T B) ii = m X i=1 m X j =1 (A) ij (B) ij with obvious notation. So, we have g (W 0 )=g (W)+ trace ( @g @ W ) T (W 0  W)] + ::: (3.21) for the first two terms in the Taylor series of a function g of a matrix variable. LEARNING RULES FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION 63 3.2 LEARNING RULES FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION 3.2.1 Gradient descent Many of the ICA criteria have the basic form of minimizing a cost function J (W) with respect to a parameter matrix W , or possibly with respect to one of its columns w . In many cases, there are also constraints that restrict the set of possible solutions. A typical constraint is to require that the solution vector must have a bounded norm, or the solution matrix has orthonormal columns. For the unconstrained problem of minimizing a multivariate function, the most classic approach is steepest descent or gradient descent. Let us consider in more detail the case when the solution is a vector w ; the matrix case goes through in a completely analogous fashion. In gradient descent, we minimize a function J (w) iteratively by starting from some initial point w(0) , computing the gradient of J (w) at this point, and then moving in the direction of the negative gradient or the steepest descent by a suitable distance. Once there, we repeat the same procedure at the new point, and so on. For t =1 2::: we have the update rule w(t)=w(t  1)  (t) @ J (w) @ w j w=w(t1) (3.22) with the gradient taken at the point w(t  1) . The parameter (t) gives the length of the step in the negative gradient direction. It is often called the step size or learning rate. Iteration (3.22) is continued until it converges, which in practice happens when the Euclidean distance between two consequent solutions kw(t)  w(t  1)k goes below some small tolerance level. If there is no reason to emphasize the time or iteration step, a convenient shorthand notation will be used throughout this book in presenting update rules of the preceding type. Denote the difference between the new and old value by w(t)  w(t  1) = w (3.23) We can then write the rule (3.22) either as w =  @ J (w) @ w or even shorter as w / @ J (w) @ w The symbol / is read “is proportional to”; it is then understood that the vector on the left-hand side, w , has the same direction as the gradient vector on the right-hand side, but there is a positive scalar coefficient by which the length can be adjusted. In the upper version of the update rule, this coefficient is denoted by  . In many cases, this learning rate can and should in fact be time dependent. Yet a third very convenient way to write such update rules, in conformity with programming languages, is w  w   @ J (w) @ w 64 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS where the symbol  means substitution, i.e., the value of the right-hand side is computed and substituted in w . Geometrically, a gradient descent step as in (3.22) means going downhill. The graph of J (w) is the multidimensional equivalent of mountain terrain, and we are always moving downwards in the steepest direction. This also immediately shows the disadvantage of steepest descent: unless the function J (w) is very simple and smooth, steepest descent will lead to the closest local minimum instead of a global minimum. As such, the method offers no way to escape from a local minimum. Nonquadratic cost functions may have many local maxima and minima. Therefore, good initial values are important in initializing the algorithm. Local minimum Gradient vector minimum Global Fig. 3.1 Contour plot of a cost function with a local minimum. As an example, consider the case of Fig. 3.1. A function J (w) is shown there as a contour plot. In the region shown in the figure, there is one local minimum and one global minimum. From the initial point chosen there, where the gradient vector has been plotted, it is very likely that the algorithm will converge to the local minimum. Generally, the speed of convergence can be quite low close to the minimum point, because the gradient approaches zero there. The speed can be analyzed as follows. Let us denote by w  the local or global minimum point where the algorithm will eventually converge. From (3.22) we have w(t)  w  = w(t  1)  w   (t) @ J (w) @ w j w=w(t1) (3.24) Let us expand the gradient vector @ J (w) @ w element by element as a Taylor series around the point w  , as explained in Section 3.1.4. Using only the zeroth- and first-order terms, we have for the i th element @ J (w) @w i j w=w(t1) = @ J (w) @w i j w=w  + m X j =1 @ 2 J (w) @w i w j j w=w  w j (t  1)  w  j ]+::: LEARNING RULES FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION 65 Now, because w  is the point of convergence, the partial derivatives of the cost function must be zero at w  . Using this result, and compiling the above expansion into vector form, yields @ J (w) @ w j w=w(t1) = H(w  )w(t  1)  w  ]+::: where H(w  ) is the Hessian matrix computed at the point w = w  . Substituting this in (3.24) gives w(t)  w   I  (t)H(w  )]w(t  1)  w  ] This kind of convergence, which is essentially equivalent to multiplying a matrix many times with itself, is called linear. The speed of convergence depends on the learning rate and the size of the Hessian matrix. If the cost function J (w) is very flat at the minimum, with second partial derivatives also small, then the Hessian is small and the convergence is slow (for fixed (t) ). Usually, we cannot influence the shape of the cost function, and we have to choose (t) , given a fixed cost function. The choice of an appropriate step length or learning rate (t) is thus essential: too small a value will lead to slow convergence. The value cannot be too large either: too large a value will lead to overshooting and instability, which prevents convergence altogether. In Fig. 3.1, too large a learning rate will cause the solution point to zigzag around the local minimum. The problem is that we do not know the Hessian matrix and therefore determining a good value for the learning rate is difficult. A simple extension to the basic gradient descent, popular in neural network learn- ing rules like the back-propagation algorithm, is to use a two-step iteration instead of just one step like in (3.22), leading to the so-called momentum method. Neural network literature has produced a large number of tricks for boosting steepest descent learning by adjustable learning rates, clever choice of the initial value, etc. However, in ICA, many of the most popular algorithms are still straightforward gradient descent methods, in which the gradient of an appropriate contrast function is computed and used as such in the algorithm. 3.2.2 Second-order learning In numerical analysis, a large number of methods that are more efficient than plain gradient descent have been introduced for minimizing or maximizing a multivariate scalar function. They could be immediately used for the ICA problem. Their ad- vantage is faster convergence in terms of the number of iterations required, but the disadvantage quite often is increased computational complexity per iteration. Here we consider second-order methods, which means that we also use the information contained in the second-order derivatives of the cost function. Obviously, this infor- mation relates to the curvature of the optimization terrain and should help in finding a better direction for the next step in the iteration than just plain gradient descent. 66 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS A good starting point is the multivariate Taylor series; see Section 3.1.4. Let us develop the function J (w) in Taylor series around a point w as J (w 0 )=J (w)+ @ J (w) @ w ] T (w 0  w)+ 1 2 (w 0  w) T @ 2 J (w) @ w 2 (w 0  w)+::: (3.25) In trying to minimize the function J (w) , we ask what choice of the new point w 0 gives us the largest decrease in the value of J (w) . We can write w 0  w =w and minimize the function J (w 0 ) J (w)= @ J (w) @ w ] T w +1=2w T @ 2 J (w) @ w 2 w with respect to w . The gradient of this function with respect to w is (see Example 3.2) equal to @ J (w) @ w + @ 2 J (w) @ w 2 w ; note that the Hessian matrix is symmetric. If the Hessian is also positive definite, then the function will have a parabolic shape and the minimum is given by the zero of the gradient. Setting the gradient to zero gives w =  @ 2 J (w) @ w 2 ] 1 @ J (w) @ w From this, the following second-order iteration rule emerges: w 0 = w   @ 2 J (w) @ w 2 ] 1 @ J (w) @ w (3.26) where we have to compute the gradient and Hessian on the right-hand side at the point w . Algorithm (3.26) is called Newton’s method, and it is one of the most efficient ways for function minimization. It is, in fact, a special case of the well-known Newton’s method for solving an equation; here it solves the equation that says that the gradient is zero. Newton’s method provides a fast convergence in the vicinity of the minimum, if the Hessian matrix is positive definite there, but the method may perform poorly farther away. A complete convergence analysis is given in [284]. It is also shown there that the convergence of Newton’s method is quadratic;if w  is the limit of convergence, then kw 0  w  k kw  w  k 2 where  is a constant. This is a very strong mode of convergence. When the error on the right-hand side is relatively small, its square can be orders of magnitude smaller. (If the exponent is 3 , the convergence is called cubic, which is somewhat better than quadratic, although the difference is not as large as the difference between linear and quadratic convergence.) On the other hand, Newton’s method is computationally much more demanding per one iteration than the steepest descent method. The inverse of the Hessian has to be computed at each step, which is prohibitively heavy for many practical cost functions in high dimensions. It may also happen that the Hessian matrix becomes ill-conditioned or close to a singular matrix at some step of the algorithm, which induces numerical errors into the iteration. One possible remedy for this is [...]... this special case that @ @ log j det j = ( T ) 1 W W W 76 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS w x w x 3.6 Consider a cost function J ( ) = G( T ) where we can assume that is a constant vector Assume that the scalar function G is twice differentiable 3.6.1 Compute the gradient and Hessian of J ( ) in the general case and in the cases that G(t) = t4 and G(t) = log cosh(t) 3.6.2 Consider maximizing this function... batch algorithm is a deterministic iteration because the random vector is averaged out on the right-hand side It can thus be analyzed with all the techniques available for one-step iteration rules, like fixed points and contractive mappings In contrast, the on-line algorithm is a stochastic difference equation because the righthand side is a random vector, due to (t) Even the question of the convergence... decreasing sequence, typically satisfying w w x x w 1 X =1 1 X2 (t) = 1 (3.35) (t) < 1 (3.36) t =1 t wx and the nonlinearity g ( ) satisfies some technical assumptions [253], then it can be shown that the on-line algorithm (3.32) must converge to one of the asymptotically 72 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS stable fixed points of the differential equation (3.34) These are also the convergence points of... and relatively simple: typically, we require that the norm of is constant, or some quadratic form of is constant We can then use another constrained optimization scheme: projections on the constraint set This means that w w 74 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS we solve the minimization problem with an unconstrained learning rule, which might be a simple steepest descent, Newton’s iteration, or whatever... (3.43), and yet the norm of w will stay approximately equal to one ( ) ( ) ( )+ ( ( ) ) 3.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS AND REFERENCES More information on minimization algorithms in general can be found in books dealing with nonlinear optimization, for example, [46, 135, 284], and their applications [172, 407] The speed of convergence of the algorithms is discussed in [284, 407] A good source for matrix gradients. .. reduced; the value of the function @@ g ( ) has to be computed only once, for the vector (t) In w wx x 70 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS wx the batch algorithm, when evaluating the function @@ Efg ( )g, this value must be w computed T times, once for each sample vector (t), then summed up and divided by T The trade-off is that the on-line algorithm typically needs many more steps for convergence... two-dimensional gaussian data with zero mean and covariance matrix 3 w 1 1 2 : Apply the stochastic on-line learning rule (3.37), choosing a random initial point and an appropriate learning rate Try different choices for the learning rate and see how it effects the convergence speed Then, try to solve the same problem using a batch learning rule by taking the averages on the right-hand side Compare the computational... WW 1 ) : Keeping this inner product constant, it was shown in [4] that the largest increment for J (W + W) is obtained in the direction of the natural gradient @J @W nat = @J @W W T W 68 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS W WW W So, the usual gradient at point must be multiplied from the right by the matrix T This results in the following natural gradient descent rule for the cost function J ( ):... constraint, and for simplicity let us write the update rule as w w w g (w ) w=kwk (3.43) (3.44) where we have denoted the gradient of the cost function by g(w) Another way to write this is w w kw g (w ) g(w)k CONCLUDING REMARKS AND REFERENCES 75 Now, assuming the learning rate is small as is usually the case, at least in the later iteration steps, we can expand this into a Taylor series with respect to and. .. between the steepest descent and Newton’s method with respect to both the computational load and convergence speed Also the conjugate gradient method provides a similar compromise [46, 135, 284, 172, 407] In ICA, these second-order methods in themselves are not often used, but the FastICA algorithm uses an approximation of the Newton method that is tailored to the ICA problem, and provides fast convergence . J (w) @ w 64 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS where the symbol  means substitution, i.e., the value of the right-hand side is computed and substituted. of gradients Example 3.1 Consider the simple linear functional of w , or inner product g (w)= m X i=1 a i w i = a T w 60 GRADIENTS AND OPTIMIZATION METHODS