1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Immunogenicity of measles vaccine of measles and rubella combined vaccine manufactering by polyvac

5 34 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 5
Dung lượng 86,17 KB

Nội dung

To assess immunogenicity of measles vaccine of measles and rubella combined vaccine. Subjects and methods: Randomized, controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was conducted on 756 people aged from 1 to 45 years old in Hanam and Hoabinh provinces, measured measles antibody titer by EIA technique, analyzed indexes to evaluate immunogenicity.

Trang 1

IMMUNOGENICITY OF MEASLES VACCINE OF MEASLES

AND RUBELLA COMBINED VACCINE MANUFACTERING BY POLYVAC

Nguyen Xuan Dong 1 ; Dinh Hong Duong 2 ; Nguyen Thuy Huong 3

Ha The Tan 2 ; Vu Tung Son 2 ; Vu Ngoc Hoan 2

SUMMARY

Objectives: To assess immunogenicity of measles vaccine of measles and rubella combined

vaccine Subjects and methods: Randomized, controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was

conducted on 756 people aged from 1 to 45 years old in Hanam and Hoabinh provinces,

measured measles antibody titer by EIA technique, analyzed indexes to evaluate

immunogenicity Results: In negative antibody group, post-vaccination seroconversion rate was

100% In positive antibody group, measles and rubella combined vaccine, post-vaccination

geometric mean titer was 46.85 EIA units, significantly higher than pre-vaccination and control

vaccine, with a remarkable growth post-vaccination antibody titer

* Keywords: Measles and rubella combined vaccine; Immunogenicity

INTRODUCTION

In Vietnam, after implementing vaccines

in the expanded immunization program,

the epidemic situation of measles has

changed positively with the trend of

substantially decline morbidity and mortality

However, measles is still circulating with a

3 - 5 year period of epidemic, the number

of cases has still been high [1] The goal

of eliminating measles nationwide has

been continuously pushed back over time

and faced many difficulties and challenges,

partly due to the lack of vaccine sources

The vaccine against rubella and rubella used previously was imported from India

In fulfillment of a cost decrease in the expanded immunization program and actively control, prevent these measles, POLYVAC has successfully produced

measles and rubella combined vaccine

(MRVAC) according to technology transfer from Japan Before applying in community,

we conducted this study: To assess the

immunogenicity of measles vaccine of MRVAC vaccine

1 Military Institute of Medicine Preventive

2 Vietnam Military Medical Univerity

3 Center for Research and Production of Vaccines and Biologicals

Corresponding author: Nguyen Xuan Dong (nguyen.xuan.dong81@gmail.com)

Date received: 05/09/2019

Date accepted: 10/10/2019

Trang 2

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

1 Subjects

* Volunteers:

A total of 756 people in Hanam and

Hoabinh provinces participated in the study,

included 420 children from 1 to 2 years

old, 168 people over 2 to under 18 years

old and 168 people from 18 to 45 years

old There were 504 subjects vaccinated

MRVAC and 252 subjects immunized

control vaccine Research time: from April

8, 2016 to July 27, 2016

* Vaccines:

- Study vaccine: MRVAC vaccine

produced by POLYVAC

+ Ingredients: Each bottle included 10

doses of measles vaccine is reconstituted

with 5.5 mL solvent Each dose 0.5 mL

included:

Live, further attenuated AIK-C measles

strain ≥ 1.000 PFU

Live, further attenuated Takahashi rubella

strain ≥ 1.000 PFU

Stabilizers: Lactose 2%; D-sorbitol 0.72%;

L-sodium glutamate 0.4%; hydrolized

gelatin 0.36%

Antibiotics: Erythromycin ≤ 12.5 µg;

kanamycin ≤ 12.5 µg

+ Lot number: MR-0115; production date: November 4, 2015; expiry date: November 4, 2017

Control vaccine: MR vaccine produced

by India Lot number: 012N4072; Production date: July 2014; expiry date: August 1,

2016

2 Methods

* Research design:

Randomized, controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was conducted M0 blood sample was taken immediately before vaccination, M1 sample was collected 42 - 56 days after immunization

to quantify pre- and post-vaccination measles antibody (figure 1) No sooner were M0 and M1 blood samples gathered at the commune health stations than they were transferred to Preventive Medicine Center

of Hanam province and Kimboi district to conduct on serum centrifugation Then serum samples were quantified antibody titer by enzyme immuno assay (EIA) technique at Vaccine Immunization Board, Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, converting international units with the formula: EIA unit x 45 = milli-international units/mL (mIU/mL)

Vaccination

0 42 56 day

Collecting M0 blood sample Collecting M1 blood sample

Figure 1: Vaccination and taking blood sample diagram

Trang 3

A total of 756 subjects had their blood

drawn for the first time, but when

collecting M1 blood samples, 23 subjects

withdrew from the study, including: 2

cases of identical serum code, someone

refused second blood sample collection

and other left the residence, so they could

not participate (although these subjects

had pledged that they did not leave the

locality within 2 months before entering

the study), only 733 blood samples were

quantified post-vaccination antibody titer

Immunogenicity of measles vaccine has been assessed by some major indexes: seroconversion rate, an antibody titre increase, pre- and post-vaccination geometric mean titre (GMT) follow in study and age groups

* Ethical issues in research:

This study complies with ethical principles

of Declaration of Helsinki and the revisions, current regulations of Ministry of Health

on Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1 In negative antibody group

Table 1: Seroconversion rate of measles antibody

Age group

Overall as well as separate analysis by age group, seroconversion rate of measles antibodies in both study groups was 100% Most of the participants in our study were vaccinated with at least one measles vaccine or were infected, so the number of subjects without antibodies was low After MRVAC vaccination, seroconversion rate was similar to study by Doan Huy Hau et al (100%), who clinical tried a single vaccine MVVAC containing AIK-C measles strain like MRVAC and Takeuchi Y (94.5%) who tried HF vaccines with the same formula on Japanese children [2, 4]

Table 2: Post-vaccination GMT of measles antibody follow in study groups

(5.05 - 5.65)

4.71 (4.20 - 5.23)

(33.13 - 50.21)

26.17 (18.38 - 37.53)

0.029

The post-vaccination GMT of two study groups were respectively 40.79 EIA units (1,835.6 mIU/mL) and 26.17 EIA units (1,177.7 mIU/mL) Log2GMT of MRVAC group

Trang 4

was significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.05, independent sample t-test) Thus, in negative antibody group, immune response after MRVAC vaccination had been stronger than control vaccine and been equivalent to the study by Doan Huy Hau (5.31 Log2 EIA unit) [2]

2 In positive antibody group

With positive antibody group, the growth of antibody titer was not as strong as the negative group Measuring immune response after vaccination by indexes including the growth of GMT, multi-fold increase of antibody titer from pre- to post-vaccination [5]

Table 3: Pre- and post-vaccination GMT of measles antibody in two study groups

Pre-vac (1) (n = 458)

Post-vac (2) (n = 458)

Pre-vac (3) (n = 234)

Post-vac (4) (n = 234)

p

Log 2 GMT

(95%CI)

4.52 (4.42 - 4.61)

5.55 (5.49 - 5.60)

4.58 (4.44 - 4.73)

5.14 (5.03 - 5.24) GMT

(95%CI)

22.94 (21.41 - 24.42)

46.85 (44.94 - 48.50)

23.92 (21.71 - 26.54)

35.26 (32.67 - 37.79)

(1;2): 0.001 (3;4): 0.001 (1;3): 0.382 (2;4): 0.001

Pre- and post-vaccination GMT was

respectively 22.94 EIA units

(1,032.3 mIU/mL) and 46.85 EIA units

(2,108.3 mIU/mL) in the MRVAC group;

23.75 EIA units (1,068.8 mIU/mL) and

35.26 EIA units (1,586.7 mIU/mL) in the

control group Data analysis showed

that post-vaccination Log2 GMT was

significantly higher than pre-vaccination in

both study groups (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon

test) Thus, both vaccines even increased

measles antibody titer in possitive antibody group There was no significant difference between pre-vaccination Log2GMT in two study groups (p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney test) However, post-vaccination Log2GMT in MRVAC group was higher than control group (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test), which indicated that MRVAC vaccine increased measles antibody titer more remarkably than control vaccine

Table 4: The growth of post-vaccination measles antibody titer by study and age group

1 - 2 years

> 4 fold

254

131

0.004

> 2 to < 18

years

> 4 fold

100

49

0.001

Trang 5

18 - 45

years

> 4 fold

104

54

0.017

Total

> 4 fold

458

234

0.001

The growth of measles antibody titer

had been also an important criterion for

evaluating immune response of vaccines

Data analysis in both study groups

showed that a less than 2 fold-increase in

antibody titer from pre- to post-vaccination

accounting for the highest proportion of

53.3 and 72.2%, respectively, from 2 to

under 4-fold occupying 26.6 and 20.5%,

from 4 and above-fold took up the lowest

with 20.1 and 7.3% Comparison between

the two study groups, the rate of a less

than 2 fold-increase in the MRVAC group

was lower, but from 2 to under 4-fold and

from 4 and above-fold increase were

higher than control group by overall and

age group analysis The difference was

statistically significant (p < 0.05,

Chi-square test) The MRVAC vaccine rosed

antibody levels more strongly than control

vaccine Measles antibody titer in our

study increased more remarkably than

study by Dang Thi Thanh Huyen et al,

who also conducted research on children

in Kimboi district, Hoabinh with the rate of

less than 2 fold, from 2 to under 4-fold

and from 4 and above-fold increase were

57.1%, 34.3% and 8.6%, respectively [3]

CONCLUSION

MRVAC vaccine achieved immunogenicity

requirements to measles virus through

evaluation parameters such as seroconversion rate, high post-vaccination GMT, with a marked increase in antibody titer, post- compared to pre-vaccination GMT and immune response were stronger than the control vaccine

REFERENCES

1 Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Duong Thi Hong

characteristics of measles in Vietnam,

2013 - 2014 Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine 2016, XXVI, 4 (177), pp.98-106

2 Doan Huy Hau, Dao Xuan Vinh, Dinh Hong Duong et al Evaluation of safety and

immunogenicity of the measles vaccine MVVAC manufacturing by POLYVAC (phase 1 and 3) Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine

2011, XXI, 4, pp.110-117

3 Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Pham Ngoc Dinh, Nguyen Van Cuong et al Immunogenicity of

second dose measles vaccine at 18 months of age in Kimboi district, Hoabinh province Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine

2013, XXIII, 7 (143), pp.26-32

4 Takeuchi Y, Togashi T, Sunakawa K et

al Field trial of combined measles and rubella

live attenuated vaccine Infectious Disease Magazine 2002, 76 (1), pp.56-62

5 WHO Guidelines on Clinical Evaluation

of Vaccines: Eegulatory Expectations 2016.

Ngày đăng: 16/01/2020, 03:34

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w