Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 53 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
53
Dung lượng
1,11 MB
Nội dung
HANOI PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOREIGN LANGUAGE FACULTY NGUYỄN THANH VÂN ASTUDYONTHEEFFECTIVENESSOFUSINGMINDMAPPINGINTEACHINGANDLEARNINGVOCABULARYWITH10THGRADESTUDENTSATTAMDUONGHIGHSCHOOL Thesis proposal submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, Faculty of English, Hanoi Pedagogical University Supervisor: Dr William H Salazar, Ed.D May, 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study is the result of this researcher's experiences inthestudyof English language learningandteachingusingMindMapping to teach vocabulary I am grateful for the great support and encouragement from my teachers, friends and family I would like to express my sincere thanks to all who helped me to complete my research project First of all, I would give a big thanks to my supervisor Dr William H Salazar, who supervised me in conducting this research project I am grateful for his patience, and encouragement while I was learning how to conduct this research project Secondly, I am indebted to the participants of this study: three dedicated and knowledgeable English teachers and 78 students from TamDuongHigh School, from Vinh Phuc province who without their participation, this project would never been completed A special thanks also goes to all my teachers past and present for their encouragement, expertise and support, as I progressed through my education program at HPU2 Last but not least, I would like to show my gratitude to my family for their spiritual, emotional and financial support, and for giving me the optimism to continue my learning STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Tittle: AStudyontheEffectivenessofUsingMindMappinginTeachingandLearningVocabularywith10thGradeStudentsatTamDuongHighSchool I certify that no part of my thesis has been copied or reproduced by me from any from other person‟s work without acknowledgement and that study is originally written by me under the carefully guidance of my supervisor Date submitted: 9th of May 2018 Student Nguyen Thanh Van Supervisor Dr William H Salazar LIST OF ABBREVIATION FOE Faculty of English FOL Faculty of Languages HPU2 Hanoi Pedagogical University 2L Second language learners TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP LIST OF ABBREVIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT PART ONE .2 INTRODUCTION Rationale 2 Aims ofthestudy 3 Scope oftheStudy Overview ofthestudy PART TWO: DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER I: LITERATURE REVIEW An overview oftheteachingandlearningofvocabulary 1.1 Theoretical background to theteachingofvocabulary 1.2 How vocabulary enhances language abilities Background inusingMindMappinginlearningvocabulary 2.1 MindMappinginLearningvocabulary 10 2.2 Different facets ofMindMapping 10 2.3 Vocabulary enhancement usingMindMapping 11 Chapter II: METHODOLOGY 12 Participants 12 1.1 Students 12 1.2 Teachers 12 Data collection instruments 12 2.1 Questionnaires 12 2.1.1 Rationale for using Questionnaires 12 2.1.2 Description of survey questionnaires 13 2.2 Interviews 13 2.2.1 Rationale for using interviews 13 2.2.2 Description of interviews 14 2.3 Pre/Post Tests 14 2.3.1 Rationale ofusing Pre/Post tests 14 2.3.2 Pre and Post test 14 Planning 15 Procedures of data collection 16 Chapter III: ANALYSIS OF DATA 18 Survey Questionnaires 18 1.1 Demographic information 18 1.2 Survey questions 18 Tests 29 2.1 Analysis of Pre-test 29 2.2 Analysis of Post-Test 31 Teacher interviews 33 3.1 Interview with teacher A 33 3.2 Interview with Teacher B 34 3.3 Interview with Teacher C 34 PART THREE .35 CONCLUSION 35 Conclusion 35 Theoretical implications 35 Pedagogical Implications 36 Limitations ofthestudy 37 Suggestions for future research 38 REFERENCES 40 APPENDIX 42 Tables Table 1: Procedures of Pre and Post tests 15 Table 2: When students learn vocabulary .20 Table 3: How students know about MindMapping 25 Table 4: Students‟ awareness about learningVocabularyusingMindMapping 26 Table 5: Student‟s frequency ofusingMindMapping 26 Table 6: Student‟s opinion onthe advantages ofUsingMindMapping to 28 learn Vocabulary 28 Table 7: The most important factor when students use MindMapping 29 Figures Figure 1: A typical example ofMindMapping Figure 2: The students‟ awareness about the importance oflearningvocabulary 19 Figure 3: Rating English Vocabulary skills ofStudents 21 Figure 4: The methods that students often use to learn English Vocabulary 22 Figure 5: The percentage ofvocabulary that students can remember from teacher‟s lesson 24 Figure 6: Experimental Group Pre-test scores 30 Figure 7: Control Group Pre-test Scores 31 Figure 8: Experimental Group Post-test scores 32 Figure 9: Control group Post-test scores 32 ABSTRACT Vocabulary is perhaps the most challenging part of 2nd language acquisition for non-native teachers and their students (Allen, 1983) Therefore, techniques for teachingandlearningvocabulary are of major concern in many high schools and universities This research had two focus: one, the researcher investigated the current situation ofteachingandlearning vocabulary; andthe other was to studythe use ofMindMappingintheteachingandlearningvocabularyatTamDuongHighSchoolin Vinh Phuc Providence The participants for this study were 78 students from two classes: 10A3 and 10A9 The majority of these students have learnt English for at least five years and are believed to be atthe Pre-intermediate level in English proficiency A survey was given to determine how students learn vocabularyinand outside ofthe classrooms, their attitude toward thestudyofvocabularyand their knowledge ofMindMapping This study also interviewed three teachers concerning their views ontheteachingofvocabularyandthe use ofMindMapping Moreover, Pre and Posts tests were given to the students, which were used to check the English vocabulary knowledge of both classes The Control group-10A3 used traditional techniques: translating from English to Vietnamese, using dictionary, and repetition; andthe Experimental group-10A9 use MindMapping to learn vocabulary) The results showed that students had a lot of difficulty inlearningvocabulary Teachers andstudents often used traditional techniques to teach and learn vocabulary, but not MindMapping to learn vocabulary; even thought some of them (13 out of 78 students; and three teachers) were aware ofthe advantages ofMindMappingThe group that used Mind Mapping, the Experimental group, had better performance inthe Post tests than the Control group Key words: Teaching Vocabulary, Mind Mapping, Teaching Techniques PART ONE INTRODUCTION Rationale In our globalize world, we can not deny the importance of English, as it is one ofthe most spoken languages inthe world Thanks to English, people can communicate as well as interact in many sectors: economics, politics, culture, finance, education, diplomacy, tourism, and education Developing countries, like Vietnam, need to make use of this world-wide spoken language in order to improve its place inthe international economy Vocabularylearning is considered as one ofthe most important skills inlearninga foreign language because it helps learners developing L2 competency skills in speaking, reading, writing, and listening Acquiring a wide vocabulary is important for both teachers andstudents Based onthe reason above, the focus should be onthevocabulary development, as the key for students to master English However, as cited by Zhang (2009), he asserts that learninga second language (2L), is a difficult process for both teacher and student It requires preparation on behalf ofthe teacher and determination on part ofthe learner (Zimmerman, 1997) Therefore, both teachers andstudents have a difficult time in developing andlearning interesting techniques to teach and learn English vocabulary As a fourth year student inthe foreign language faculty, at Hanoi Pedagogical University (HPU2), who has studied English for several years, this researcher understands the importance oflearningvocabularyLearningvocabulary is the basis for each ofthe four English component skills: listening, speaking, writing and reading Learningvocabulary is a long process, it requires that teachers present as many different techniques to learn vocabulary; and it requires students to persevere inlearningvocabularyinthe manner that fits their learning style (Carter & McCarthy, 1998) As a future teacher, this researcher is aware ofthe vital role an English teacher plays to motivate students to learn vocabularyin an effective and interesting way One ofthe techniques is to teach vocabulary through MindMapping This technique can boost memorizing vocabulary Many researchers believe that usingMindMapping seems to provide a different and more interesting way for students to learn vocabulary (Azman, et al, 2014) Therefore, this researcher has decided to conduct astudyonthe topic: A Control Group Pre-test Scores 17,90% 20,60% < than correct 5-7 correct 8-10 correct 61,50% Figure 7: Control Group Pre-test Scores As the chart shows the scores for the Control group performed better inthe Pretest, than the Experimental group For example, the Control group had 20,6% correct answers inthe 8-10 correct section ofthe pie, but the Experimental had 0% correct answers inthe 8-10 section ofthe pie Inthe middle range, the Experimental group has more correct answers ( 61,5% compared to 52,8%) than the Control group Similarly, inthe less than correct answers, the Experimental group scored lower by the score of 47,2% compared to Control group‟s scored of 17,9% This researcher observed that the background knowledge ofthe Control group is better than the Experimental group The researcher observed that the Experimental group was more excited about the unit 9: Preserving the Environment, and were better studentsinlearning about pollution Also, this researcher noticed that the Control group had more boys, who did not take the lesson seriously 2.2 Analysis of Post-Test The Post-tests were given to both groups atthe 6th week ofthe researcher‟s student teaching period Things happen with student all the time There were several situations that the researcher could not control The Post-test may have been affected because of health problems, going to school late and some ofstudents from both group were not willing to take the Post- test, so the number ofstudents from Experimental group were 31 studentsand 34 studentsin Control group This time, the researcher always reminded students to take the test seriously and asked one more training teacher to observe students while doing the Post-tests The data is illustrated inthe charts below for the Experimental and Control groups 31 Experimental Group Post-test Scores N=31 6,41% 16,12% < than correct to correct 8-10 correct 77,48% Figure 8: Experimental Group Post-test scores Control Group Post-test Scores N=34 3% 44,10% < than correct to correct 8-10 correct 52,90% Figure 9: Control group Post-test scores The analysis ofthe Post-test between the Experimental andthe Control group reveals the following information: The Experimental group had a score of 44,10% to 16,10% for Control group in getting five words or correct There is a 25 percent difference (77,4% for the Experimental group to 52,9% for the Control group) inthe 5-7 correct words The number of correct words for both groups (8-10 correct), remained low at 6,4% for the Experimental group and 3% for the Control group) 32 The results show that both groups are of average ability in remembering the definition ofvocabulary As the two pie charts show, the performance of Experimental group is better than the Control group This means the use ofMindMapping worked inthe Experimental group, atthe same time this can explain that the Control group did not take the Pre-test seriously because the result ofthe number ofstudents got 8-10 correct answer and 5-7 correct answer were decreased from the 20,60% to 3% and 61,5% to 52,9% respectively; which expected to be increased after learning this whole Unit The challenge for teachers is to examine how to use strategies, so that students to retain more of what they studyin their lessons Teacher interviews As part of this research studythe research interviewed three teachers from TamDuongHighSchool who have taught a minimum of five years They were asked to share their views on: ATheteachingof English vocabulary to highschoolstudents B Their views onusingMindMapping to teach English vocabulary Three teachers were interviewed the second week ofthe researcher‟s student teaching period The three teachers were interested to share their views and talked about the importance andthe challenges ofteaching English vocabulary For the purpose of this analysis, the teachers are given the letters, A, B, C Teacher A has been teaching for 13 years atTamDuongHighSchoolThe following are the comments made by teacher A 3.1 Interview with teacher A Teacher A states that one ofthe techniques to get students to learn the meaning of words is to teach students to use context clues; this forces students to figure out the meaning ofthe words they read She also uses phrases or combination of words so that students can figure out what the words mean She mentions that students take a lot of time to figure out the meaning of words, when they use context clues, but by the time they are inthe 12 grade, students are better at this technique She uses Vietnamese translation as the last resort, to know the definition of words Concerning the use ofMind Mapping, she uses this technique, but not very often “Mind Mapping is good for forming a family of words.” She uses MindMapping as a warm-up activity to check background knowledge ofthe lesson; uses it atthe end ofthe lesson, to review the lesson The question concerning the advantages and disadvantages ofMind Mapping, 33 she admitted that would be a logical way to teach vocabulary as it would expand the students‟ vocabulary However, when teaching vocabulary, she said it is important to teach vocabularyin phrases, so students can use the word in appropriately, that teaching single words, is a lower level learning skills Inhighschoolstudents need to make sentences A disadvantage to MindMapping has to with student motivation, so teachers spend time to thinking of motivating activities She uses MindMapping only for review Like all teachers she wishes she had a software to use Mind Mapping, so she won‟t have to spend a lot of time planning on how to match the unit‟s vocabulary to MindMapping 3.2 Interview with Teacher B The following is the interview with teacher B Teacher B has been teaching for years When asked about her ideas onteachingvocabulary she replied that she uses pictures so that students guess the correct word She also uses games to learn new vocabulary She also commented that she translates from English to Vietnamese, because the Students‟ English level is very low Regarding the challenges about teachingvocabulary she commented, “that students have very poor pronunciation; and that students have a hard time remembering vocabulary words” She stated that she uses Mind Mapping, in reading and speaking lessons She said that MindMapping is a good technique, it helps student to expand their vocabularyandstudents can recall the words quicker, but it takes a lot of time to prepare a lesson 3.3 Interview with Teacher C Teacher C has been a teacher for five years She said that she relies on translating English vocabulary to Vietnamese, so that students know the meaning ofthe words She also state that she does not have time to research using other techniques When asked about the challenges inteachingvocabulary She replied that students have a hard time absorbing the knowledge that are presented inthe book She said that she does not use MindMapping to teach vocabulary or in any other way She related that she is aware ofthe advantages ofusingMindMapping is a good way to show the relationship between words; and it is good for learning parts of speech, as it is used in book exercises She agreed with her colleagues, as she said the disadvantages to usingMind Mapping, “Is it takes a lot of time to plan” 34 PART THREE CONCLUSION Inthe conclusion, the researcher will point out the positive and negative aspects ofusingMindMappinginteachingandlearningvocabularywith10thgradestudentsatTamDuongHighschool Also the theoretical and pedagogical implications will be discussed The limitations ofthestudyand Suggestions for future research will be mentioned in this part Conclusion The researcher believes that combining these two ideas: thestudyofvocabularyandthe use ofMindMappinginteachingandlearningVocabulary are the main focus of this research project By usingthe traditional or new techniques, teachers andstudents can achieve their goal ofteachingandlearning vocabulary, so that students are competent in all the four areas of English proficiency: Speaking, writing, listening, and reading Inthe introduction, the researcher implied that the used ofMindMapping is a good technique inTeachingandLearningVocabularywith10thGradeStudentsatTamDuongHighSchoolThe results ofthe survey showed that students had difficulty learning English vocabularyStudents were aware of their difficulties inlearning vocabulary, but they not know how to learn vocabularyin an effective ways Also, the techniques that teachers andstudents often use were traditional techniques (translating from English into Vietnamese and repetition), but they not use Mind Mapping; even though they all saw a lot of advantages of this technique The use ofMindMappinginthe Experimental group in this study had positive results The Experimental group had better scores than the Control group in Post- test (+ 28% ofstudents got to 10 correct answers) Therefore, the use ofMindMapping could be used inHighSchool settings as one of techniques that motivate students to learn vocabulary Theoretical implications According to Zhang (2009), he states that acquiring a large number ofvocabulary is important for both teacher and student, for this is the way that teachers can conduct a good lesson andstudents can understand what the lesson is about Vocabulary learn35 ing is considered one ofthe most significant skills inlearninga second language Similarly, Allen (1983), argues that vocabulary instruction has not been given the recognition and attention it deserves So, vocabulary skills are very low And this effects communication skills Methodology specialists believe that very little is taught about how to teach words and their meanings This researcher believes that having a theoretical background on how not only to teach words, but the meaning of words In this way teacher can motivate their students to learn vocabularyon their own by usingthe techniques that teachers introduce inthe classroom In this way students meet their personal demands when the want to communicate what they want to say in their daily lives Not all learning takes place inthe classroom MindMapping is a useful tool for both the teacher and student to increase their understanding and use ofvocabulary This researcher Allen (1983) argues that for many years, vocabulary instruction was not given the recognition andthe attention that it deserves inthe foreign language classroom She suggests that in methodology courses, so little is taught about how to teach words and their meanings Some methodology specialists, seemed to believe that the meaning of words could not be adequately taught, so it was better not to try to teach them Lawson & Hogben, 1998, write when students use memory techniques withMind Mapping, they learn better and faster Sozler (2012), argues that students learn easily remember vocabulary through the use of acronyms, and images, inthe classroom setting and outside ofthe classroom Buzan, (1976), the founder ofMindMapping states, “A Mind Map is a powerful graphic technique…to unlock the potential ofthe brain.” Understanding the function ofthe brain gives teachers andstudentsa way of boosting their understanding ofvocabulary He believes that though MindMappingstudents are more effective when they combine images, number, logic.” This makes learning process more interesting and enjoyable for teachers andstudents Pedagogical Implications According to the result of Survey questionnaire and interviews, learningvocabulary is a real challenge for both teachers and students; it requires teachers to research and apply new teaching techniques to motivate their students; besides just only using traditional techniques like repetition and translating English words into Vietnamese 36 One ofthe potential and useful techniques is Mind Mapping; which is a good tool for teachers to use in improving English language skills for students like: Speaking, Reading, Writing and Listening These are some suggestions ofusingMindMappinginteaching One ofthe most important things is that teachers have to prepare lessons ina very organized manner that focuses onthe main vocabulary words ofthe lesson, and avoid teaching too many vocabulary words because ofthe limitations inthe 45 minute lesson Furthermore, the use of PowerPoint and visual aids should be used to motivate students to learn and remember words Students learn better with pictures, colors intheMind Map When usingMind Mapping, teachers can design many activities to encourage students to study, like working in groups to create aMind Map WithMind Mapping, students can sometimes draw pictures, highlight new words, and write phrases in English or Vietnamese to illustrate their words, and ideas They can practice speaking or writing based onthe Map that they just created However, before using any new techniques, teachers are required to understand how they work and how to use them with their students Limitations ofthestudy Although the researcher put a lot of effort to make sure that there were no mistakes in this research There were some limitations in this study First of all, the survey questionnaires had some drawbacks The population who took part in this study was 78 students from class 10A3 and 10A9, from aschool that has approximately 1,100 students So the number ofstudents surveyed is quite small A good survey will have a large number ofstudentsin which to make good generalizations Another limitation is that number of boys to girls was not equal (There were 26 boys and 56 girls.) So, it is difficult for make a good conclusion about boys learningvocabulary or learningandusingMindMapping Also, the researcher did not have chance to interview students to confirm or clarify the reasons for choosing their answers onthe survey, which led to the consequence that some ofthe students‟ answers were different When the researcher asked about students‟ experience oflearningvocabularywithMind Mapping; only thirteen out ot 78 students‟ reported that they had used MindMapping This means the only a small number students‟ had some knowledge ofMindMapping 37 Futhermore, the researcher interviewed only three out of eight English teachers, to get their views onteachingvocabularyandusingMindMapping This is one ofthe disadvantages in this studyin that the researcher did not get the more information from other teachers, and how they teach vocabulary Also, the researcher could not verify if what they said about teachingvocabularyandusingMind Mapping, was truthful, because the researcher did not observe all their teaching Moreover, the student teaching internship only lasted weeks, and it took a while for the researcher andstudents to know each other and cooperate inthe new way teachingandlearningIn addition, the researcher only taught one unit: Preserving the Environment This is a hard topic and not all thestudents were interested in it Andwiththe Experimental group, the researcher spent more time to teach vocabulary as they were not used to MindMapping compared to the Control group; this affected to the results ofstudentsinthe Post-test When thestudents took the pre-test, all students from both groups participated willingly; but some ofthestudentsinthe Control group did not take it seriously, therefore the results ofthe Control group are not reliable When the researcher gave the Post-test, the researcher asked another teacher to help give the post-test So the post-test results are more reliable Unfortunately, some students missed the post-test, for a variety of reasons, and it affected the total number ofstudents who took the posttest The researcher conducted this research when she did her student teaching internship and did not have much experience in teaching, or usingMindMapping to teach vocabulary Because ofthe lack of experience the researcher could not take advantages of how to motivate students to use MindMapping to improve their vocabulary skills Suggestions for future research Some suggestions for future is for the researcher to continue to studyand learn how to use MindMapping more effectively so that it can be used with different student levels Another suggestion is to survey more participants and to collect more data: video tape teaching lessons, classroom observations, interviewing more teachers and to also students Another suggestion is to give the survey to the Experimental group one more time after they have learned withMind Mapping, so the researcher 38 can get more reliable students‟ evaluation about their understanding and opinion on use ofMindMappingin their learning process Also the researcher wants to enhance her teaching experience so that she can use MindMapping to increase her teaching English skills and to an action research studyin her own classroom 39 REFERENCES Allen, F (1983) Techniques inTeachingVocabulary Oxford: University Press Barra, C (2005) Working WithVocabulary Retrieved January 13, 2018 from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/working-vocabulary Beel, Gipp, & Stiller (2009) In Proceedings ofthe 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Work sharing Washington (USA) Retrieved April 22, 2018 from www.docear.org Buzan, T (1976) Use Both Sides of Your Brain New York: E P Dutton & Co Retrieved Apri 15, 2018 from www.tonybuzan.com Cardenas (2001) Issues on Active Speaking Vocabulary Assessment Lowa State University Retrieved December 26, 2017 from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/vocabulary/working_with_vocabulary.sht ml Carter, R., and McCarthy, M (eds) (1988) Vocabularyand Language Teaching London: Longman Douglas, D (2000) Assessing language for specific purposes Cambridge: University Press Retrieved March 11, 2018 from: http://www.learninghaven.com/la/vocabulary/teachingvocabulary.htm 10 Ellis, N., & Beaton, A (1993) Factors affecting thelearningof foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol: 46A p.553-558 11 Hubbard, P et al.(1983) A training course for TEFL Oxford: OUP 12 Lawson, M J & Hogben D (1998) Learningand recall of foreign-language vocabulary: effects ofa keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall Learningand Instruction, vol.8, no.2, pp.179-194 13 Pua, C., Li, D., Lui, C., Chen, S (2010) Using Mind-Mapping as a Tool to Teach English Vocabulary for the Elementary Students Retrieved April 10th, 2018 from: www.edb.org.hk/HKTC/download/eras/12-13/ERAS1213_R04.pd 14 McKeown, M G., L (2002) Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction New York, NY: Guilford 40 15 Nation, I S P (2001) Learningvocabularyin another language United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 16 Scrivener, Jim (1994) LearningTeaching Adrian Underhill: New Cambridge 17 Sozler, S (2012) The Effect of Memory Strategy Training onVocabulary Development of Austrian Secondary SchoolStudents Proscenia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol: 46, p 1348-1352 18 Tee, T.K., Azman, M.N.A., Muhammad, M.,, Mohamad, M.M., Yunos, J.Md., 19 Yee, H.H., Ohman, W (2014) Buzan Mind Mapping: An Efficient Technique for Note-Taking World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 20 International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Vol:8, No:1, 2014 World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 21 International Retrieved from http://www.ncicap.org/viewer-resources/about- captioning/captioning-terms/ 22 Widdowson, H G (1989) Knowledge of language and ability for use (Vol 2-10) England: Coventry 23 Wilkins, D (1972) Linguistics in language teaching London: Arnold 24 Wen, W L (2006) Studyon Improving Reading Comprehension of Elementary SchoolStudents via Graphic Learning Unpublished master’s thesis Taiwan: National Taiwan University 25 Zhang, B (2009) VocabularyLearningof Undergraduate English Majors in Western: Perspective, Strategy Use andVocabulary Size English Language Teaching Vol 2, No 26 Zimmerman, C (1997) Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study TESOL Quarterly Retrieved December 21, 2017 from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/vocabulary/vocab_autonomy.shtml retrieved from Internet 41 APPENDIX STUDENT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE I am Nguyen Thanh Van, a fourth year English pedagogical student at HPU2 This survey questionnaire is designed to support my studyon "A StudyontheEffectivenessofUsingMindMappinginTeachingandLearningVocabularywith10thGradeStudentsatTamDuongHigh School." You can be assured that all the information collected will be used for the research purposes only and your personal opinion will be kept strictly confidential Your contribution to complete this survey is highly appreciated! Thank you for your participation! _ I Student's personal information and experience inlearning English You are in grade: … You are: Male Female Your age is: … You have learned English for … years II Student’s opinion onlearning English vocabulary Please circle the appropriate letters and tick (V) the appropriate boxes In some questions, more than one option can be accepted In your opinion, how important is learningvocabularyin your studyof English? B Very important C Somewhat important C Important D Not important Have you had any difficulties inlearning English vocabulary? A Always B Very often C Sometimes D Never How often you study vocabulary? (in and outside classroom) A Everyday B Very often (4-5 times a week) C Sometimes (2-3 times a week) D Never 42 How much time you spend learning English vocabulary per week outside ofthe classroom? A More than hours C Less than hour B hour to hours D Never When you learn vocabulary? A Whenever I have free time B Before English lesson C Before English tests D Only when teachers teach me in class E Never How you rate your English vocabulary skills now? A Excellent C Fair B Good D Poor Which techniques you often use to learn English vocabulary? ( you can choose more than one answer) AUsing dictionaries B Asking for help from friends, teachers C Guessing from context clues D Analyzing words (part of speech, suffixes, prefixes,….) E Usinglearning techniques (pictures, flashcards,…) F Keeping avocabulary notebook G Watching films, TV shows, YouTube videos with subtitles H Listening to English songs I UsingMindMapping J Using repetition K Other ( please specify) Which techniques your teachers often use to teach English vocabulary? (You can choose more than one answer) A Translating new words into Vietnamese B Explaining words in English 43 C Giving example to illustrate the meaning D Using movies and videos ( with English subtitles) E Using visual aid (pictures, flashcards, real object,… ) F UsingMindMapping G Using repetition H Others ( please specify) How much vocabulary that you can remember from teacher‟s lesson? A Every word C A few B Almost all ofthe words D Very few III Student’s opinion onusingMindMappinginlearningvocabulary 10 Have you ever learnt vocabulary through English Mind Mapping? A Yes B No If the answer is Yes, please answer the questions from 11 to 15 If the answer is No, please answer the questions from 16 11.How you know to use MindMapping to learn vocabulary? A From teachers or friends C From taking an online course B From reading books D Create MindMapping by myself 12 How important you think MindMapping is inlearning vocabulary? A Very necessary C Quite necessary B Necessary D Not necessary at all 13 How often you use Mind Mapping? Always Usually Rarely 14 What is the advantage ofusingmindmapping to learn vocabulary? (put a tick (v) for each answer) Advantage ofMind Strongly Mapping agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree It is very easy for me to remember words It is very logical and 44 clear It helps me to remember vocabulary longer It helps me to learn vocabularyin an interesting way 15 What is the most important thing to learn vocabularywithMind Mapping? A Find out the connection between words or phrases B Arrange words in logical orders C How to draw theMind Map D Other (please specify) 16 Why you not use MindMapping to learn vocabulary? A I have never heard about it B No one has taught me how to use it C It takes too much time C I see no advantage of this technique THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! Teacher Interview questions: How you teach vocabulary? What are the challenges ofteaching vocabulary? Have you used MindMapping to teach vocabulary? What you think ofthe advantages and disadvantages ofMindMapping to teach vocabulary? 45 ... one, the researcher investigated the current situation of teaching and learning vocabulary; and the other was to study the use of Mind Mapping in the teaching and learning vocabulary at Tam Duong. .. learning STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Tittle: A Study on the Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Teaching and Learning Vocabulary with 10th Grade Students at Tam Duong High School I certify that... topic: A Study on the Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Teaching and Learning Vocabulary with 10th Grade Students at Tam Duong High School Aims of the study The aims of study are as follows: