Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
No 1109 Submission on AGM Organization Regulation tài liệu, giáo án, bài giảng , luận văn, luận án, đồ án, bài tập lớn v...
Ni dung 1, Những tiền đề tư tưởng lý luận HCM Thứ nhất, là giá trị truyền thống văn hóa dân tộc Việt Nam Với lịch sử dựng nước và giữ nước lâu đời đã hình thành nên những giá trị truyền thống tốt đẹp của dân tộc ta và đó chính là chủ nghĩa yêu nước, giá trị này chính là hành trang mang theo của HCM trong quá trình ra đi tìm đường cứu nước. Chủ nghĩa yêu nước được hình thành trong quá trình đấu tranh dựng nước và giữ nước của dân tộc ta qua hàng nghìn năm lịch sử, trở thành động lực lớn cho dân tộc trong cuộc đấu tranh chống kẻ thù xâm lược. Chủ nghĩa yêu nước luôn đứng đầu bảng giá trị trong truyền thống văn hóa của dân tộc Việt, “là dòng sữa tinh thần nuôi sống dân tộc Việt Nam từ thời lập quốc cho đến ngày nay và mãi mãi về sau”. Chủ nghĩa yêu nước sẽ biến thành lực lượng vật chất thực sự khi nó ăn sâu vào tiềm thức, vào ý chí và hành động của mỗi con người Việt nam. Chính vì lẽ đó HCM đã đúc kết thành chân lý: “Dân ta có một lòng nồng nàn yêu nước. Đó là một truyền thống quý báu của ta. Từ xưa đến nay, mỗi khi Tổ quốc bị xâm lăng, thì tinh thần ấy lại sôi nổi, nó kết thành một làn sóng vô cùng mạnh mẽ, to lớn, nó lướt qua mọi sự nguy hiểm, khó khăn, nó nhấn chìm tất cả lũ bán nước và lũ cướp nước”. Cùng với chủ nghĩa yêu nước thì trong truyền thống văn hóa của dân tộc VN với những giá trị văn hóa tốt đẹp như tinh thần kiên cường bất khuất, tinh thần tương thân tương ái, đoàn kết cộng đồng, tinh thần khoan dung, nhân nghĩa thủy chung; tinh thần lạc quan yêu đời; tinh thần trọng trí thức, hiền tài… ảnh hưởng đến sự hình thành tư tưởng HCM. Thứ hai, Tinh hoa văn hóa nhân loại. HCM đã ảnh hưởng rất nhiều những giá trị tinh hoa văn hóa nhân loại,trước hết là văn hóa phương Đông (như Nho gia, Đạo gia, Pháp gia, Phật giáo…) trong đó, Nho giáo là ảnh hưởng sâu đậm đối với sự hình thành tư tưởng của Người, Người đã chắt lọc những mặt tích cực hợp lý, loại bỏ những tiêu cực để xây dựng một xã hội tốt đẹp. Những mặt tích như: Những chuẩn mực để tu dưỡng đạo đức trong xã hội của Nho giáo; Tư tưởng về một xã hội Đại đồng của Khổng Tử; Tư tưởng lấy dân làm gốc; tư tưởng hành đạo giúp đời; hay Nho giáo là luôn đề cao việc học, coi trọng hiền tài…Còn những mặt tiêu cực mà HCM phê phán như: Nho giáo phân chia xã hội thành những đẳng cấp khác nhau trong xã hội, người tiểu nhân và người quân tử, kẻ lao tâm và người lao lực; tư tưởng trọng nam khinh nữ; những hủ tục lạc hậu, tư tưởng trông chờ ỷ lại, tâm lý tự ti, thụ động, coi khinh lao động chân tay… 1 Về chủ nghĩa Tam dân của Tôn Trung Sơn như: Dân sinh, dân quyền và dân quốc, đó là dân tộc thì được độc lập, dân quyền thì được tư do và dân sinh thì được hạnh phúc. Đặc biệt, sau khi Lênin lãnh đạo cách mạng Tháng Mười thành công, thì Tôn Trung Sơn đã có những tư tưởng tiến bộ, ông chủ trương “Thân Nga, liên cộng, phù trợ công nông” nghĩa là thân với nước Nga Xô Viết để chống chủ nghĩa đế quốc, liên minh với Cộng sản, ủng hộ giai cấp công nông trong sự nghiệp CM. Về Phật giáo, HCM đã kế thừa những mặt tích cực hợp lý và loại bỏ những yếu tố hạn chế. Về mặt tích cực như: những tư tưởng về cứu khổ cứu nạn, Phật giáo lên án sự phân chia xã hội thành các giai cấp và chủ trương thực hiện bình đẳng trong xã hội, Phật giáo phái thiền tông còn đề cao lao động chống lười biếng. Những hạn chế như những tư tưởng trong triết học Phật giáo mang tính duy tâm, khó thực hiện. Về văn hóa phương Tây, đó là Người nghiên cứu tư tưởng của những nhà khai sáng Pháp như Rútxô, Môngtexkiơ, Vônte, Điđờrô…đó là tinh thần pháp luật, khế ước xã hội hay học thuyết về tam quyền phân lập. Những tư tưởng của các ông là nền tảng, cơ sở cho CMTS sau này như CM Anh, Mỹ, Pháp. Những cuộc CM này đã đóng góp vào trong giá trị văn minh của nhân loại là xã hội công dân và nhà nước pháp quyền đã ra đời. Sau này khi nghiên Ha Noi, 13th April 2016 No.: 1109/TTr-HDQT SUBMISSION On the approval of the Regulations on organizing the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of BaoViet Holdings To: 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of BaoViet Holdings In order to organize 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (“AGM”), The Board of Directors (“BOD”) of BaoViet Holdings (“BVH”) respectfully submit for approval of the Regulations on organizing the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of BaoViet Holdings The draft of the Regulations is attached to this Submission The BOD respectfully submit to the AGM for approval Achieves: - As above; - BOD, Supervisory Board; - For filing: Admin, General Secretary Dept ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN (Signed and sealed) Dao Dinh Thi Regulations on Organizing 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of BaoViet Holdings (Attached with the Submission No 1109/TTr-HDQT of the Board of Directors of BaoViet Holdings dated 13th April 2016) CHAPTER I GENERAL REGULATIONS Article Scope of application This Regulation on organizing the General Meeting of Shareholders (“GM”) is applied to the organization of 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Baoviet Holdings Article This regulation specifies roles and responsibilities of participants, conditions and a way to organize the GM Article Shareholders and participants are responsible for implementing this Regulation CHAPTER II ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANTS Article Roles and responsibilities of GM participants Conditions to participate in the GM All shareholders who own BVH shares as per the shareholders list finalized on th 28 March 2016 or legally authorized people Roles and responsibilities of shareholders who are entitled to participate the GM a Shareholders or authorized people attending the GM should bring the following documents: - Invitation - ID card or passport - Authorization letter (in case they are authorized to attend the meeting*) (*If the shareholders are individuals, the written authorization must be signed by the shareholders, if the shareholder is an organization, the authorization document must be stamped and signed by the legal representative of the organization.) After presenting the above documents to the Shareholders’ eligibility inspecting division, Shareholders or the authorized people attending the GM will receive a voting card (note shareholder’s code and number of votable shares) The value of the voting card is equivalent to the ratio of the number of shares the Shareholders own or represent as registered to attend the GM per total votable shares of the attending shareholders b Shareholders are able to authorize in writing to the authorized people to attend the meeting and on behalf of them vote at the GM The authorized people are not allowed to reauthorize to other people to attend the GM c Shareholders, representatives attending the GM after listening to the reports on contents to be approved will discuss and approve by voting d If Shareholders would like to contribute ideas, they need to note discussed issues on the question tags and give them to the Secretary Board The discussed issues which have been mentioned should be short, concentrated on contents of GM The issues which have been discussed previously should not be reiterated to avoid overlaps e Shareholders or the authorized people attending the GM are eligible to vote on all issues under authorization of the GM in accordance with the BVH Charter f During the GM, shareholders are to obey the Chairing Board, display polite behavior and not disrupt proceedings in a disorderly manner g Shareholders or the authorized people attend the meeting after the opening section, after completing the registration procedures, they can attend and participate in voting on the rest of votable issues as per the approved meeting agenda In this case, the effect of the completed voting is not affected Article Roles and responsibilities of the Chairman and Chairing Board BOD Chairman is the GM Chairman Responsibilities of the Chairing Board: a Manage all the actives of GM according to the agenda approved by the GM Undertake the necessary actions to make GM happened in order, reflexing the expectations of the majority of attending shareholders b Lead the shareholders and the meeting in discussion c Present the draft and necessary contents for shareholders approval d Answer questions from shareholders Article Roles and responsibilities of Shareholders’ eligibility Inspecting Division The Shareholders’ eligibility Inspecting Division is decided by BOD The Shareholders’ eligibility Inspecting Division checks the validity against the shareholder list finalized on March 28th 2016; delivers the documents and voting cards; reports to the GM on the result of the inspection of the shareholder’s eligibility before the GM is officially conducted Article Roles and responsibilities of the Secretary Board of the GM The Chairman introduces the Secretary ...EN EN EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.6.2010 COM(2010) 289 final 2010/0160 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL On amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies {SEC(2010) 678} {SEC(2010) 679} EN 2 EN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Experience of the financial crisis has exposed important failures in financial supervision, both in particular cases and in relation to the financial system as a whole. The European Commission has piloted a fundamental overhaul of financial supervision in Europe with the objective of establishing a more efficient, integrated and sustainable European system of supervision. This builds on the findings of the group of high level experts, chaired by Mr Jacques de Larosière, former general director of the International Monetary Fund, and mandated by President Barroso to make recommendations to strengthen European supervisory arrangements,. The Group presented its report on 25 February 2009 and its recommendations were endorsed by the Commission in its Communication to the Spring European Council of March 2009 1 . The key elements of the reform proposed by the Commission are : 1. Establishing a European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS), consisting of a network of national financial supervisors working in tandem with new European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), created by transforming the existing European supervisory committees 2 in a European Banking Authority (EBA), a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), and a European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), thereby combining the advantages of an overarching European framework for financial supervision with the expertise of local micro-prudential supervisory bodies that are closest to the institutions operating in their jurisdictions, and 2. Establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), which shall monitor and assess potential threats to financial stability that arise from macro-economic developments and from developments within the financial system as a whole. To this end, the ESRB would provide an early warning of system-wide risks that may be building up and, where necessary, issue recommendations for action to deal with these risks. In particular, concerning credit rating agencies, the De Larosière Group was of the view that it would be far more rational to entrust the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) with the task of licensing credit rating agencies in the EU, monitoring their performance, and in the light of this imposing changes. In its Communication of 27 May 2009 on European Financial Supervision 3 , the Commission therefore proposed that a European Supervisory Authority should be given the responsibility for the authorisation and supervision of certain entities with pan-European reach, e.g., credit rating agencies. These responsibilities could include such powers as those of investigation, on-site inspections and supervisory decisions. These responsibilities would be defined in the 1 Commission Communication on Driving European Recovery of 4.3.2009, COM(2009) 114 final 2 These are the PRODUCT STANDARDS Pressure Equipment GUIDANCE NOTES ON THE UK REGULATIONS APRIL 2005 URN 05/1074 1 Contents Page Pressure Equipment - Essential features of the law 3 Free movement of goods 4 The Pressure Equipment Regulations 5 Products affected by the Regulations 5 Product classification 7 Technical requirements 9 Conformity assessment 11 Enforcement 14 Other legislation 16 Useful information and contacts 17 ANNEX A - Equipment excluded from the scope of the Regulations 20 ANNEX B - Classification charts 22 ANNEX C - Product classification and ANNEX C - conformity assessment flowchart 28 ANNEX D - Essential safety requirements 30 ANNEX E - Conformity assessment procedures 43 ANNEX F - Declaration of Conformity 56 This document is intended to help suppliers of pressure equipment and enforcement authorities to understand, in general terms, the main features of the Pressure Equipment Regulations 1999 ("the PER"). It is informative and for guidance only and cannot act as a substitute for the Regulations which constitute the law. The guide has no legal authority and is not an authoritative interpretation of the Regulations, which is a matter for the Courts. You should always refer to the PER themselves for a full statement of the legal requirements and, if appropriate, seek your own independent legal advice. The PER may be revised from time to time so users should keep themselves informed. In this regard information may be obtained from the DTI's Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate. 2 3 Pressure Equipment - Essential features of the law The Pressure Equipment Regulations 1999 (“the PER” – SI 1999/2001) implemented the Pressure Equipment Directive (“PED” 97/23/EC) in the United Kingdom and entered fully into force on 29 November 1999. The PER were amended in two respects by the Pressure Equipment (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/1267) with effect from 30 May 2002. (For more details see pages 6 and 15 below under ‘Exclusions’ and ‘Penalties’ respectively). From 30 May 2002, pressure equipment and assemblies placed on the market and put into service in the United Kingdom must comply with the PER. General Requirements Subject to the exclusions described below, the PER make it an offence for a ‘responsible person’ (see page 6) to place on the market, put into service or otherwise supply pressure equipment and assemblies above specified pressure/ volume thresholds unless: they are safe; they meet essential safety requirements covering design, manufacture and testing; they satisfy appropriate conformity assessment procedures and are accompanied by a declaration of conformity; and they carry the CE marking and other information in English. Pressure equipment and assemblies below specified pressure/volume thresholds must: be safe; be designed and manufactured according to ‘sound engineering practice’ (SEP); be accompanied by adequate instructions for use; and bear specified markings (but not the CE marking). Common requirements apply throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) so that pressure equipment complying with the PER may be placed on the market or put into service anywhere in the EEA. 4 Failure to comply with the PER: means that such pressure equipment or assemblies cannot legally be placed on the market or put into service in the UK or the Community or EEA. could result in prosecution and penalties on conviction of a fine From Submit to Submitted via Submission: On Lexical Rules in Large-Scale Lexicon Acquisition. Evelyne Viegas, Boyan Onyshkevych §, Victor Raskin §~, Sergei Nirenburg Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA viegas, boyan, raskin, sergei~crl, nmsu. edu Abstract This paper deals with the discovery, rep- resentation, and use of lexical rules (LRs) during large-scale semi-automatic compu- tational lexicon acquisition. The analy- sis is based on a set of LRs implemented and tested on the basis of Spanish and English business- and finance-related cor- pora. We show that, though the use of LRs is justified, they do not come cost- free. Semi-automatic output checking is re- quired, even with blocking and preemtion procedures built in. Nevertheless, large- scope LRs are justified because they facili- tate the unavoidable process of large-scale semi-automatic lexical acquisition. We also argue that the place of LRs in the compu- tational process is a complex issue. 1 Introduction This paper deals with the discovery, representation, and use of lexical rules (LRs) in the process of large- scale semi-automatic computational lexicon acqui- sition. LRs are viewed as a means to minimize the need for costly lexicographic heuristics, to reduce the number of lexicon entry types, and generally to make the acquisition process faster and cheaper. The findings reported here have been implemented and tested on the basis of Spanish and English business- and finance-related corpora. The central idea of our approach - that there are systematic paradigmatic meaning relations be- tween lexical items, such that, given an entry for one such item, other entries can be derived auto- matically- is certainly not novel. In modern times, it has been reintroduced into linguistic discourse by the Meaning-Text group in their work on lex- ical functions (see, for instance, (Mel'~uk, 1979). § also of US Department of Defense, Attn R525, Fort Meade, MD 20755, USA and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. USA. §§ also of Purdue University NLP Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. It has been lately incorporated into computational lexicography in (Atkins, 1991), (Ostler and Atkins, 1992), (Briscoe and Copestake, 1991), (Copestake and Briscoe, 1992), (Briscoe et al., 1993)). Pustejovsky (Pustejovsky, 1991, 1995) has coined an attractive term to capture these phenomena: one of the declared objectives of his 'generative lexi- con' is a departure from sense enumeration to sense derivation with the help of lexical rules. The gen- erative lexicon provides a useful framework for po- tentially infinite sense modulation in specific con- texts (cf. (Leech, 1981), (Cruse, 1986)), due to type coercion (e.g., (eustejovsky, 1993)) and simi- lar phenomena. Most LRs in the generative lexi- con approach, however, have been proposed for small classes of words and explain such grammatical and semantic shifts as +count to -count or -common to +common. While shifts and modulations are important, we find that the main significance of LRs is their promise to aid the task of massive lexical acqui- sition. Section 2 below outlines the nature of LRs in our approach and their status in the computational pro- cess. Section 3 presents a fully implemented case study, the morpho-semantic LRs. Section 4 briefly reviews the cost factors associated with LRs; the BioMed Central Page 1 of 7 (page number not for citation purposes) Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health Open Access Review Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use & clinical research in vulnerable populations Birka Lehmann Address: Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany Email: Birka Lehmann - blehmann@bfarm.de Abstract Before any medicinal product is authorised for use in adults, it must undergo extensive pharmaceutical consistency and stability tests, toxicological tests and clinical trials to ensure that it is of high quality, safe and effective. The same approach may not always be applied to medicinal products used to treat children. Studies showed that over 50% of the medicinal products used in children may not have been tested for use in this age group. The absence of suitable authorised medicinal products to treat conditions in children results from the fact that pharmaceutical companies do not adapt medicinal products to the needs of the paediatric population. This leaves health care professionals with no alternative other than to use medicinal products "off-label" and to use unauthorised products with the associated risks of inefficacy and/or adverse reactions. The Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 sets up a system of requirements, rewards and incentives, together with horizontal measures, to ensure that medicinal products are researched, developed and authorised to meet the therapeutic needs of children. The Regulation is addressed to: 1. The pharmaceutical industry by setting out the legal framework for receiving rewards and incentives by conducting clinical trials in the paediatric population. 2. The Member States to set out to support research into, and the development and availability of, medicinal products for paediatric use. 3. The Community as funds for research into medicinal products for the paediatric population shall be provided for in the Community budget in order to support studies relating to medicinal products or active substances not covered by a patent or a supplementary protection certificate. The legal framework for conducting clinical trials, including children/minors, is set up in Directive 2001/20/EC, the Clinical Trials Directive (CTD), for the European Union (EU). The CTD establishes specific provisions regarding conduct of clinical trials, including multi-centre trials, on human subjects involving medicinal products and in particular relating to the implementation of good clinical practice. Compliance with this good practice provides assurance that the rights, safety and well-being of trial subjects are protected, and that the results of the clinical trials are credible. The CTD is addressed to all investigators conducting clinical trials including clinical trials in the paediatric population and had to be applied accordingly. Published: 8 December 2008 Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2008, 2:37 doi:10.1186/1753-2000-2-37 Received: 28 July 2008 Accepted: 8 December 2008 This article is available from: http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/37 © 2008 Lehmann; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2008, 2:37 http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/37 Page 2 of 7 (page number not for citation purposes) In the framework of the authorisation of medicinal products regulated by the Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and Directive 2001/83/EC as amended and the CTD, and additional implementing Directives and guidelines, the new Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 is an important new piece of legislation focusing on the requirements to improve the situation for the paediatric ... 2016) CHAPTER I GENERAL REGULATIONS Article Scope of application This Regulation on organizing the General Meeting of Shareholders (“GM”) is applied to the organization of 2016 Annual General... This regulation specifies roles and responsibilities of participants, conditions and a way to organize the GM Article Shareholders and participants are responsible for implementing this Regulation. ..Regulations on Organizing 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of BaoViet Holdings (Attached with the Submission No 1109/ TTr-HDQT of the Board of Directors