Moreover, the author would like to describe and analyze grammatical and lexical cohesive devices in the course book of English for Chemistry for second year students in Faculty of Chemis
Trang 1course book “english for chemistry”
Phạm Thị Vân Annh
Trường Đại học KHXH&NV Luận văn ThS Chuyên ngành: Enlish Linguistics; Mã số: 60 22 15
Người hướng dẫn: Dr Trần Xuân Điệp
Năm bảo vệ: 2009
Abstract: The aim of this study is to give an overview of theoretical background of discourse
and discourse analysis; cohesion, coherence and cohesive devices; concept of ESP and ESP discourse Moreover, the author would like to describe and analyze grammatical and lexical cohesive devices in the course book of English for Chemistry for second year students in Faculty
of Chemistry at Hanoi University of Education The author wishes that the findings of the study will be applied to the teaching and learning of English for Chemistry.The study consists of three main parts of which the first part presents the rationales, scope, methodology The following part with two main chapters Chapter one gives the theoretical background of the studies with theories related to discourse and discourse analysis, cohesion and coherence, ESP Chapter two provides an analysis of grammatical and lexical cohesive devices in some written discourses taken from the textbook of EC used for second year students in Faculty of Chemistry at HNUE
In the final part, recapitulation, implications, limitations of the study and suggestions for further research are presented
Keywords: Tiếng Anh; Ngữ pháp; Từ vựng; Hóa học
Content:
Trang 2TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
List of tables
List of abbreviations
Part A: INTRODUCTION……… 1
1 Rationale……… 1
2 Aims of the study……… … 2
3 Scope of the study……… … 2
4 Methods of the study……… … 2
5 Design of the study……… 2
Part B: DEVELOPMENT……… 4
Chapter 1: Literature review and theoretical background ……… 4
1.1 Literature review……… … 4
1.2 Theoretical background……….… 4
1.2 1 Discourse and discourse analysis……… … 5
1.2.1.1 Concept of discourse……….… 5
1.2.1.2 Discourse and text……….… 5
1.2.1.3 Spoken and written discourse……… 5
1.2 1 4 Discourse analysis……….… 6
1.2.1.4.1 Context in discourse analysis……… 6
1.2.1.4.2 Register and Genre in discourse analysis……….… 7
1.2 2 Cohesion and Coherence……… 8
1.2 2.1 Cohesion vs Coherence……… 8
1.2 2.2 Aspects of Coherence……… 8
1.2 2 2.1 Topical Coherence……… … 8
1.2 2 2 2 Logical Coherence……….… 9
1.2 2 3 Types of Cohesion……….… 9
1.2 2 3 1 Grammatical Cohesion……… … 9
1.2 2 3 2 Lexical Cohesion……… … 12
1.2 3 English for Specific Purposes (ESP)……… 13
Trang 31.2 3 1 Concept of ESP……….… 13
1.2 3 2 Characteristics of ESP discourse……… … 14
1.2.4 Summary……… 14
Chapter 2: Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesive Devices in some written discourses from the course book “English for Chemistry”………
16 2.1 An overview of the analysis……… 16
2.2 Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesive Devices in some written discourses from the course book “English for Chemistry”………
16 2.2.1 Grammatical cohesive devices……… 17
2.2.1.1 References……….… 18
2.2.1.1.1 Anaphoric reference……….… 18
2.2.1.1.2 Cataphoric reference……….… 21
2.2.1.1.3 Exophoric reference……… 23
2.2.1.1.4 A comparison of anaphoric, cataphoric and exophoric reference……… 23
2.2.1.2 Conjunction……… 24
2.2.1.3 Substitution……… …… 27
2.2.1.4 Ellipsis……….… 28
2.2.1.4.1 Nominal Ellipsis……… … 28
2.2.1.4.2 Verbal Ellipsis……… … 29
2.2.1.4.3 Clausal Ellipsis……….… 30
2.2.2 Lexical cohesive devices……… 31
2.2.2.1 Reiteration……… … 31
2.2.2.1.1.Repetition……… … 32
2.2.2.1.2.Synonym……… … 35
2.2.2.1.3.Super-ordinate and general……….… 35
2.2.2.2 Collocation……… 37
2.2.2.2.1 Lexical collocation 2.2.2.2.2 Grammatical collocation 2.2.3 Summary……… 41
PART C: CONCLUSION……… 42
1 Recapitulation……… 42
2 Implications……… 43
2.1 Implications for teachers and students of EC……… 43
Trang 42.2 Suggestions for materials design……… 44
3 Limitations of the study……… 44
4 Suggestions for further research……… 44
REFERENCES……… 45
Appendix I
Appendix II
Appendix III
Appendix IV
Appendix V
Appendix VI
Trang 5PART A: INTRODUCTION
1 RATIONALE
Cohesion plays an important role in the comprehension of a written discourse This
is due to the fact that comprehension is a process that occurs within the reader and is at least partially dependent on cohesion and coherence Cohesion is used to show how sentences which are structurally independent of one another may be linked together Cohesion exists within a text and is not the same as coherence, which is something the reader establishes in the process of reading The importance of cohesion in text is major since it provides semantic continuity and permits coherence and comprehensibility The more explicit cohesive relationships are, the easier a text is to understand The coherence
of a text can be created through lexical and grammatical cohesive links and other cohesive factors When a reader is able to see how these cohesive factors contribute to the linking of sentences and ideas in a text, he not only can understand the text but can produce the text more easily as well
However, recognizing the relations within the text to obtain coherence is not easy for learners of English, especially non-English major students Most of them find it difficult to understand and produce a text This is because of the insufficient awareness of both teachers and learners in teaching and learning English, i.e learning English is learning vocabulary and grammar Moreover, students often learn words in isolation, not in combinations Meanwhile, in order to understand a reading text, the readers need to pay attention to not only vocabulary and grammar but also other factors that create links between the ideas in the text, i.e cohesive devices
Since a better understanding of cohesion undoubtedly helps teachers and students improve their teaching and learning As a teacher of English in general and of EC in particular, I decided to study some discourse features of EC texts to help improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning of EC at HNUE Due to the limitation of time and knowledge, my study just focuses on grammatical and lexical cohesive devices which are used in written discourses of EC
Trang 6The texts used for this study are taken from the EC course book used for second year students in Faculty of Chemistry at HNUE The course book was designed by our ESP teachers and was confirmed in 2008 It contains six units, from unit 1 to unit 6 We take six reading texts from these six units as written discourses of EC from which we analyze grammatical and lexical cohesive devices
2 AIMS OF THE STUDY
The aims of the study are:
- giving an overview of theoretical background of discourse and discourse analysis; cohesion, coherence and cohesive devices; concept of ESP and ESP discourse
- describing and analyzing grammatical and lexical cohesive devices in the course book of EC for second year students in Faculty of Chemistry at HNUE The findings are expected to be applied to the teaching and learning of EC
3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Within the framework of a minor M.A thesis, the study just mainly focuses on grammatical and lexical cohesive devices, their frequency of occurrence, in the six reading texts of EC taken from the textbook used for second year students in Faculty of Chemistry
at HNUE
4 METHODS OF THE STUDY
Description, analysis, statistics are the principal methods used in this study to identify grammatical and lexical cohesive devices, their frequency of occurrence in some written discourses of EC
5 DESIGN OF THE STUDY
The study includes three main parts: Introduction, Development, and Conclusion
Introduction presents the rationale, the scope, the methodology and the design of the
study
Development consists of two chapters:
Trang 7- Chapter 1: gives the theoretical background of the study with the theories related to
three main sections: discourse and discourse analysis, cohesion and coherence, ESP
- Chapter 2: provides an analysis of grammatical and lexical cohesive devices in some
written discourses taken from the textbook of EC used for second year students in Faculty of Chemistry at HNUE
Conclusion provides a recapitulation of the study, implications to teachers and students in
improving the teaching and learning of EC, limitations of the study and suggestions for further research
Trang 8REFERENCES
1 Allwright, R L (1990) What do we want teaching materials for? In R Rossner and R
Bolitho, (Eds.), Currents in language teaching Oxford University Press
2 Anthony, L (1997) ESP: What does it mean? ON CUE
http://interserver.miyazaki-med.ac.jp/~cue/pc/anthony.htm Retreived April 6, 2008, from the World Wide Web
3 Brown, G and Yule, G (1983) Discourse Analysis Cambridge University Press
4 Carter, D (1983) Some propositions about ESP The ESP Journal, 2, 131- 137
5 Celce-Murcia, M & Olshtain, E (2000) Discourse and Context Language Teaching
Cambridge University Press
6 Cook, Guy (1989) Discourse Oxford University Press
7 Crystal, D (1992) Introducing Linguistics London: Penguin
8 Dudley-Evans, T.,& St John, M (1998) Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary
approach Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9 Eggins, S (1994) An Introduction to Systematic Functional Linguistics Cont- London
10 Firth, J.R (1957) Papers in Linguistics London: Oxford University Press
11 Gains, R and Redman, S (1986) Working with Words Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
12 Halliday, M.A.K (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar London: Arnold
13 Halliday, M.A.K and Hasan, R (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspect of
Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective Victoria: Deakin University Press London: Longman Group Limited
14 Halliday, M.A.K & Hasan, R (1976) Cohesion in English Longman
15 Hutchinson,T and Water, A (1987) English for Specific Purposes: A Learning
Centred Approach Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16 McCarthy, M (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers Cambridge:
Cambridge University
17 Mc Carthy, M (1997) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers Cambridge:
Cambridge University
18 Nunan, D (1993) Introducing to Discourse Analysis Penguin
Trang 919 O'Neill, R (1990) Why use textbooks? In R Rossner and R Bolitho, (Eds.), Currents
in language teaching Oxford University Press
20 Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2000), Oxford University Press
21 Tannen, D (1982) Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives
Language, 58(1), 1-21
22 Yule, G (1996) The study of language, UK: Cambridge University Press
23 Yule, G (1996) Pragmatics Oxford: Oxford University Press
24 Hoang VanVan (2006) Introducing analysis Education Publishing House