1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Gastrointestinal Oncology - part 7 pot

44 125 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 44
Dung lượng 904 KB

Nội dung

Complications related to percutaneous drainage include bleeding and sepsis. Most sepsis occurs in patients presenting with cholangitis, in the setting of bile contaminated from previous procedures. Most early hemobilia is related to venous bleeding, and will frequent resolve with time, or exchanging the catheter for one of slightly larger diame- ter. Delayed hemobilia, or that resulting in significant blood loss, is more likely related to arterial injury, and will necessitate arterial embolization in most cases. Most patients dislike exteriorized catheters, for both physical and psychological rea- sons. When possible, every attempt is made to convert the catheters to internal stents. The same criteria for placement of endoscopic stents apply here: the patient should have a diagnosis of cancer (or recurrent cancer in the appropriate circumstance) in whom sur- gical resection for cure is not possible. Additionally, either the goal of drainage should have been met, or there are no possible additional procedures that may be necessary (eg, drainage of other parts of the biliary tree). Clearly, the patient must also have a patent and functional small bowel. Occasionally, plastic stents will have been placed endoscop- ically, but could not be exchanged, or failed due to tumor overgrowth. These stents must also be addressed, as their presence precludes placement of metallic stents (the plastic stent would be trapped). These stents may be pushed into the small bowel and elimi- nated in the feces (Figure 14-3), or may be removed percutaneously using a snare. If the stent cannot be removed percutaneously, endoscopic removal is necessary. Most percu- taneous stents currently in use are self-expanding metallic stents. Plastic stents may be placed but are rarely indicated. As noted previously, self-expanding metallic stents are recommended for most patients with malignant biliary obstruction who are not surgical candidates. Placement of metallic stents improves quality of life, owing to the absence of external tubes and their associated maintenance and risks, which include skin infection, bile leakage, and catheter obstruction or dislodgment. Even patients with longer life expectancies should be considered for metal stent placement, as several months of catheter-free existence is often preferable, even though there exists the possibility of having to undergo repeat drainage if the stent fails. 250 Chapter 14 Figure 14-2C. Internal/external drainage catheter in a different patient with ampullary carcino- ma. As opposed to the external catheters which provide exter- nal drainage only, internal/ external catheters allow for preservation of bilioenteric cir- culation and provide added sta- bility based on the length of the catheter within the duct. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 250 Metallic stents are deployed through the same tract established for biliary drainage using small (6 to 9 French) delivery systems. Most stents are self-expanding, though bal- loon expandable stents are used on rare occasions. Self-expanding stents have intrinsic radial force and, once released from the delivery device, eventually expand to their stat- ed diameter. Most percutaneously placed stents are 8 to 10 mm in diameter, but stents from 4 to 12 mm may be placed. With a larger lumen and intrinsic radial force, these stents have a longer primary patency than plastic stents, with a median patency of 7 months. Self-expanding metallic stents are very flexible and remain patent despite rela- tively acute angulation. This is a useful feature when the tumor involves the confluence Interventional Radiology 251 Figure 14-3A. Removal of endo- scopic plastic stent. Right sided percutaneous biliary drainage was performed to maximize bil- iary drainage in a patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma and an indwelling left sided endo- scopic stent (arrow) in anticipa- tion of stent placement. Figure 14-3B. Removal of endo- scopic plastic stent. The distal flange of the stent was catheter- ized with a balloon catheter (arrow). Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 251 of hepatic ducts (Figure 14-4). In the case of high bile duct obstruction, multiple stents may be placed simultaneously. Multiple ducts may be stented using both “Y” and “T” configurations. In addition to establishing biliary drainage, percutaneous access to the bile ducts provides a means for additional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures including biopsy of bile duct masses, 9,10 stone retrieval, percutaneous choledochoscopy, and placement of catheters for novel treatments such as local radiation (brachytherapy) or photodynamic therapy. When the cause of bile duct occlusion is uncertain, bile duct biopsy can be per- formed through the tract created for biliary drainage. Because the specimens obtained are from the mucosa and superficial portion of the fibromuscular layer of the duct, 10 this is most effective for mucosal and intraductal lesions, including cholangiocarcinoma and intraductal metastases, and is less effective in diagnosing extraductal lesions, such as pan- creatic cancer or liver or nodal metastases causing extrinsic compression. After cholan- giography is performed, a forceps, brush, or atherectomy device is advanced to the obstruction and a specimen is obtained. Reported sensitivities of forceps biopsy range from 30% to 100% for malignancy, but in most studies a high false negative rate effec- tively makes a “negative” biopsy nondiagnostic in most cases. Biliary stone disease is surprisingly common in cancer patients, due to concurrent gallstone disease or biliary stasis, particularly related to narrowing at a bilioenteric anas- tomosis. Small stones may pass from the gallbladder through the cystic duct into the common bile duct. When large, these are apparent preoperatively and can be removed endoscopically. Smaller stones, however, can be missed during surgery and identified by cholangiography in patients with persistent symptoms or hyperbilirubinemia. After mat- uration of a T-tube or biliary drainage tract, these stones can be safely treated in the majority of cases using either a basket or snare to remove them percutaneously, a balloon to push them through the papilla into the small bowel, or a laser lithotripsy device to disintegrate them. 10 When associated with papillary stenosis or anastomotic strictures, 252 Chapter 14 Figure 14-3C. Removal of endo- scopic stent. The stent was dis- placed into the duodenum using a balloon catheter. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 252 balloon sphincterotomy is performed to allow stone fragments to pass. In contradistinc- tion to endoscopic sphincterotomy, where there is a high incidence of sepsis and pan- creatitis, such complications following balloon sphincterotomy are uncommon. 11 Percutaneous choledochoscopy is a technique in which a fiberoptic scope similar to a bronchoscope is advanced percutaneously along the course of a biliary drainage catheter and used to visualize bile ducts, intraluminal masses, and stones in detail. Currently, the most common applications are intrahepatic stone retrieval and intraduc- tal biopsy. Choledochoscopy is performed after the maturation of a percutaneous tract following biliary drainage, which usually takes 2 to 4 weeks. When used in concert with Interventional Radiology 253 Figure 14-4A. Biliary stent. Isolated left and right ducts in a patient s/p choledochojejunos- tomy. Figure 14-4B. Biliary stent. The left sided ducts were catheter- ized from the right sided punc- ture. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 253 fluoroscopic cholangiography, the choledochoscope can easily be manipulated into the duct of interest. Once a stone is visualized, a basket, snare, or balloon catheter can be advanced through the instrument channel and used to remove the stone percutaneous- ly or to push the stone into the small bowel (Figure 14-5). P ERCUTANEOUS C HOLECYSTOSTOMY Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is indicated in patients with acute calculus or acalculous cholecystitis who are unable to undergo urgent cholecystectomy due to co- morbid disease or debilitated condition. Because of the low procedure-related morbidi- ty, in addition to its therapeutic role, PC is commonly used as a diagnostic tool in patients with unexplained sepsis. 12 PC is performed using ultrasound or CT guidance. A transhepatic approach is gen- erally preferred to minimize the risk of bile peritonitis and leakage during catheter place- ment and exchange procedures. PC allows for rapid decompression of the diseased gall- bladder as well as access for cholecystography and potential further intervention. Overdistention of the gallbladder at the time of placement is avoided because bile in dis- eased gallbladders is often infected, and overdistention may worsen sepsis in these already compromised patients. 12 After resolution of the acute episode, cholecystography can be very helpful in deter- mining the presence and level of obstruction. In cases of acalculous cholecystitis, paten- cy of the cystic duct is known to be restored when normal bile begins draining from the catheter. Once the patient’s clinical condition improves, the catheter is capped and left in place until the tract matures, at which point it can be removed. In other instances, PC catheters are left in place until the time of definitive treatment, which is usually cholecystectomy. Occasionally, percutaneous stone removal through the PC can be per- formed as a definitive procedure in high-risk patients with calculus cholecystitis. Although recurrent stone disease will cause biliary symptoms within 5 years in 20 to 50% of cases, this less invasive treatment may be preferable in patients with limited life expectancy. 254 Chapter 14 Figure 14-4C. Two Wallstents were placed to drain bile inter- nally, from the left hepatic duct to the right hepatic duct (arrows) and from the right hepatic duct into the common bile duct (curved arrow), in this patient with cholangiocarcino- ma. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 254 Interventional Radiology 255 Figure 14-5A. Cholangiography in a patient with Asian cholangiohepati- tis demonstrates multiple intrahep- atic duct stones (arrows). Figure 14-5B. Choledochoscopy. An obstructing stone is identified in the right bile duct. For a full-color version, see page CA-VII of the Color Atlas. Figure 14-5C. Choledochoscopy. A basket was advanced through the instrument channel and used to remove the stone. For a full-color version, see page CA-VII of the Color Atlas. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 255 PC may also provide biliary drainage in some patients with mid or low bile duct occlusion. The gallbladder is quite capacious, and in some cases it can enlarge to com- pletely decompress the intrahepatic bile ducts, making percutaneous biliary drainage quite difficult. In the presence of low bile duct occlusion and a distended gallbladder, PC is technically simple and provides drainage of all bile segments. Alternatively, the gallbladder may be accessed with a needle and cholecystography performed to delineate the intrahepatic bile ducts, thus facilitating percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Complications of PC include bleeding, sepsis, bile peritonitis, gallbladder perfora- tion, and catheter dislodgement. Removal of a PC prior to the formation of a mature tract can also cause bile peritonitis. Tract maturation usually occurs within 4 weeks even in debilitated patients, but may take longer in patients on immunosuppressive drugs. PERCUTANEOUS TREATMENT OF HEPATIC NEOPLASMS E MBOLOTHERAPY The liver receives oxygenated blood from both the hepatic artery and the portal vein. While the portal vein supplies the majority of the blood supply to the hepatic parenchy- ma, the hepatic artery is the predominant source of blood for most hepatic tumors, even those that are not “hypervascular.” This allows a variety of agents designed to induce in- situ cell death to be delivered to hepatic neoplasms via the hepatic artery. Embolic agents may be delivered alone (bland embolization), or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents (chemoembolization). In combination with embolization, the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents via the hepatic artery has been theorized to result in both pro- longed contact and higher concentrations of drug within the tumor, with few or no sys- temic effects. 13,14 This is an attractive theory for treating chemotherapy sensitive tumors. As an alternative to chemoembolization, chemotherapeutic agents may be administered via hepatic artery infusion pumps to achieve high “first pass” extraction by the liver as another means of achieving higher concentrations of drug within the tumor(s) with diminished systemic effects. 15 In the United States, these pumps are most often placed surgically, but they can be placed percutaneously. Even in cases of tumors which are thought to be insensitive to chemotherapy, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), increased concentration and dwell time of a drug might result in response to an agent used for chemoembolization that is not effective when administered systemically. Some early studies demonstrated higher concentration of doxorubicin within chemoembolized tumors, though these involved very few patients. 14 More recent biodistribution studies do suggest that the combination of dox- orubicin, ethiodized oil, and an embolic agent results in the highest concentration of doxorubicin in a treated tumor, compared to infusing doxorubicin alone or in combi- nation with ethiodized oil. 13 In vivo and in vitro laboratory studies also suggest that ischemia promotes cellular uptake of a radio-labeled doxorubicin analogue, most likely secondary to reduced active transport of the analogue out of the cell. 16 Hypervascular tumors are known to be sensitive to ischemia; in fact early treatment of such tumors involved hepatic artery ligation alone. There are practitioners who con- centrate on maximizing the ischemic effect of embolization, rather than adding chemotherapy to the embolic material. Bland embolization is used to treat hypervascu- lar tumors such as HCC and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. 17,18 Other tumors shown to be hypervascular by contrast enhanced cross sectional imaging, or angio- 256 Chapter 14 Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 256 graphically, can also be treated by bland embolization. In order to maximize the ischemia-induced tumor necrosis, very small particles of embolic material, typically either polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA) or tris-acryl spheres (Embospheres [Biosphere Medical, Rockland, Mass]) are injected into the vessels supplying the tumor as selectively as possible to effect terminal vessel blockade and cell death. At our institution, emboliza- tion will often be initiated with particles as small as 40 or 50 µm in diameter. Larger par- ticles (though rarely larger than 300 µm) may be employed depending on tumor char- acteristics, including the presence of shunting or the inability to achieve stasis of the ves- sel(s) supplying the tumor(s) using very small particles alone (Figure 14-6 and 14-7). A recent randomized, controlled study from Spain failed to demonstrate any signif- icant difference in survival between patients with HCC treated with chemoembolization or bland embolization, using gelfoam as the embolic material in both groups. The study did demonstrate that chemoembolization provided a significant survival benefit com- pared to conservative treatment. 19 To date, there has been no study demonstrating supe- riority of chemoembolization over particle embolization alone for prolonging survival in patients with HCC or for palliation (most commonly for control of hormonal symp- Interventional Radiology 257 Figure 14-6A. Embolization of solitary HCC. Pre-embolization CT demonstrates an enhancing mass in the right liver. Figure 14-6B. Embolization of solitary HCC. Hepatic angio- gram shows corresponding hypervascular mass (arrow) which was embolized. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 257 toms or, occasionally, for pain related to tumor bulk). Further, there are no conclusive data regarding the optimal mix and type of chemotherapeutic agent(s), embolic materi- al(s), and contrast used for chemoembolization. It is our belief that for the treatment of hypervascular tumors, bland embolization is simpler, less expensive, and obviates poten- tial side effects related to chemotherapeutic agents. One might expect that in treating hypovascular tumors, chemoembolization would be more efficacious. We do not treat hypovascular tumors with any form of embolization, as patients at our institution who 258 Chapter 14 Figure 14-6C. Embolization of solitary HCC. One day after embolization, noncontrast CT shows retention of contrast laden microspheres in the tumor. Figure 14-6D. Following resec- tion 6 weeks later, no viable tumor was present, and hepatic vessels containing microspheres were identified in the back- ground of necrosis. For a full- color version, see page CA-VIII of the Color Atlas. Figure 14-6E. Another look at resection 6 weeks later, no viable tumor was present, and hepatic vessels containing microspheres were identified in the background of necrosis. For a full-color version, see page CA-IX of the Color Atlas. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 258 Interventional Radiology 259 Figure 14-7A. Embolization of neu- roendocrine liver metastasis. Pre- embolization CT demonstrates innu- merable right and left hemi-liver metastases. Figure 14-7B. Embolization of neu- roendocrine liver metastasis. Hepatic angiogram shows multiple discrete hypervascular masses. Figure 14-7C. Embolization of neu- roendocrine liver metastasis. Follow-up CT after right hepatic artery embolization demonstrates multiple necrotic foci correspon- ding to prior tumor deposits com- pared to the untreated left metas- tases, which are solid. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11:07 AM Page 259 [...]... Radiology 1989; 170 :78 3 -7 86 15 Kemeny M Hepatic artery infusion of chemotherapy as a treatment for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer Cancer 2002;8 Suppl 1:S8 2-8 16 Kruskal JB, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, et al In vivo and in vitro analysis of the effectiveness of doxorubicin combined with temporary arterial occlusion in liver tumors JVIR 1993;4 :74 1 -7 47 17 Brown KT, Nevins AB, Getrajdman GI, et al Particle... Eur J Rad 2003; 47: 24 7- 2 50 46 Kinney TB Update on inferior vena cava filters JVIR 2003;14:42 5-4 40 47 Kercher K, Sing RF Overview of current inferior vena cava filters Am Surg 2003; 69:64 3-6 48 48 Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al Inferior Vena Caval filters: review of a 26-year-old single-center experience Radiology 2003;26(3):5 4-6 6 49 Farrell TA, Wallace M, Hicks ME Long-term results of... 1996;110:116 1-1 168 62 Seijo LM, Sterman DH Interventional pulmonology NEJM 2001;332(10) :74 0 -7 49 63 Wood DE, Liu YH, Vallieres E Airway stenting for malignant and benign tracheobronchial stenosis Ann Thorac Surg 2003 ;76 :16 7- 1 74 chapter 15 Maintenance of Luminal Patency: Dilation, Endoprosthetics, and Thermal Techniques Patrick R Pfau, MD INTRODUCTION Advanced malignancy may result in obstruction of the gastrointestinal. .. 1998;82(1) :7 8-8 4 282 Chapter 14 30 Goldberg SN, Kruskal JB, Oliver BS, et al Percutaneous tumor ablation: increased coagulation by combining radio-frequency ablation and ethanol instillation in a rat breast model Radiology 2000;2 17: 82 7- 8 31 31 Yu AS, Hu K Management of ascites Clin Liver Dis 2001;5(2):54 1-5 68 32 Zervos EE, Rosemurgy AS Management of medically refractory ascites Am J Surg 2001;181:25 6-6 4 33... small-bore catheter drainage Chest 1998;113:130 5-1 311 57 Jerjes-Sanchez C, Ramirez-Rivera A, Elizalde JJ, et al Intrapleural fibrinolysis with streptokinase as an adjunctive treatment in hemothorax and empyema: a multicenter trial Chest 1996;109(6):151 4-1 519 58 Pollak JS, Burdge CM, Rosenblatt M, et al Treatment of malignant pleural effusions with tunneled long-term drainage catheters JVIR 2004;12:20 1-2 08... of small pulmonary nodules Radiology 19 97; 202: 97 40 Schwartz LH, Ginsberg MS, Burt BE, et al MRI as an alternative to CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses in patients with lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:19 3-1 97 41 Dodd LG, Mooney EE, Layfield LJ, Nelson RC Fine-needle aspiration of the liver and pancreas: a cytology primer for radiologists Radiology 19 97; 203: 1-9 42 Reeves AR, Shashadri R, Terotola... close follow-up are warranted In certain cases, incisional or even excisional biopsy may be warranted Percutaneous biopsy needles range in size from 1 4- to 25-gauge, and may be of either coring or noncoring design Larger needles (2 0- to 14-gauge) needles are typically used to perform core biopsies, where pieces of tissue are obtained for pathologic evaluation Smaller needles (2 5- to 20-gauge) are commonly... cured by percutaneous acetic acid injection therapy? Hepatology 1996;23:99 4-1 002 24 Goldberg SN, Dupuy DE Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities Part I JVIR 2001;12:102 1-1 032 25 Dupuy DE, Goldberg SN Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities Part II JVIR 2001;12:113 5-1 148 26 Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, et al Percutaneous sonographically... decompression followed by laparoscopic resections Surg Endosc 2002;16:148 3-1 4 87 5 Lee SH The role of oesophageal stenting in the non-surgical management of oesophageal strictures BJR 2001 ;74 :89 1-9 00 6 Abadal JM, Echenagusia A, Simo G, Camunez F Treatment of malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas with covered stents Abd Imag 2001;26:56 5-5 69 7 Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin R, et al Guidelines for the diagnosis... approach JVIR 2002;13: 37 9-3 83 34 O’Neill MJ, Weissleder R, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Mueller PR Tunneled peritoneal catheter placement under sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in the palliative treatment of malignant ascites AJR 2001:61 5-6 18 35 Richard HM, Coldwell DM, Boyd-Kranis RL, Murthy R, Van Echo DA Pleurx tunneled catheter in the management of malignant ascites JVIR 2001;12: 37 3-3 75 36 Park JS, Won . full-color version, see page CA-IX of the Color Atlas. Ch14.qxd 4/8/2005 11: 07 AM Page 258 Interventional Radiology 259 Figure 1 4 -7 A. Embolization of neu- roendocrine liver metastasis. Pre- embolization. innu- merable right and left hemi-liver metastases. Figure 1 4 -7 B. Embolization of neu- roendocrine liver metastasis. Hepatic angiogram shows multiple discrete hypervascular masses. Figure 1 4 -7 C of the ves- sel(s) supplying the tumor(s) using very small particles alone (Figure 1 4-6 and 1 4 -7 ). A recent randomized, controlled study from Spain failed to demonstrate any signif- icant difference

Ngày đăng: 10/08/2014, 15:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN