Dynamic Routing Protocols Functions of Dynamic Routing Protocols: -Dynamically share information between routers.. • However, the expense of using dynamic routing protocols is dedicatin
Trang 2 Describe the role of dynamic routing protocols and esc be e o e o dy a c ou g p o oco s a d
place these protocols in the context of modern network design.
Identify several ways to classify routing protocols
Describe how metrics are used by routing protocols Describe how metrics are used by routing protocols
and identify the metric types used by dynamic routing protocols.
Determine the administrative distance of a route and
describe its importance in the routing process.
Identify the different elements of the routing table
Trang 3Dynamic Routing Protocols
Dynamic routing protocols are usually y a c ou g p o oco s a e usua y
used in larger networks to ease the
administrative and operational overhead
of using only static routes
Typically, a network uses a combination
Trang 4The Evolution of Dynamic Routing Protocols
One of the earliest routing protocols was Routing Information Protocol (RIP).
RIP h l d i t i RIP 2 H
– RIP has evolved into a newer version RIPv2 However,
– The newer version of RIP still does not scale to larger network implementations
To address the needs of larger networks, two advanced routing protocols were
developed: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate
System-to-I t di t S t (IS IS)
Intermediate System (IS-IS).
Cisco developed Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) and Enhanced IGRP
(EIGRP), which also scales well in larger network implementations.
Additionally there was the need to interconnect different internetworks and provide
Additionally, there was the need to interconnect different internetworks and provide routing among them Border Gateway Routing (BGP) protocol is now used between ISPs as well as between ISPs and their larger private clients to exchange routing
information.
With the advent of numerous consumer devices using IP the IPv4 addressing space
With the advent of numerous consumer devices using IP, the IPv4 addressing space
is nearly exhausted Thus IPv6 has emerged To support the communication based
on IPv6, newer versions of the IP routing protocols have been developed (see the
IPv6 row in the table).
Trang 5Dynamic Routing Protocols
Function(s) of Dynamic Routing Protocols:
-Dynamically share information between routers.
-Automatically update routing table when topology changes.
-Determine best path to a destination Determine best path to a destination.
– Compared to static routing, dynamic routing protocols require less administrative overhead
• However, the expense of using dynamic routing protocols is dedicating part of a router's However, the expense of using dynamic routing protocols is dedicating part of a router s resources for protocol operation including CPU time and network link bandwidth.
– One of the primary benefits to using a dynamic routing protocol is that routers
exchange routing information whenever there is a topology change This exchange
Trang 6Dynamic Routing Protocols
Despite the benefits of dynamic routing, static routing still esp e e be e s o dy a c ou g, s a c ou g s has its place
There are times when static routing is more appropriate and There are times when static routing is more appropriate and other times when dynamic routing is the better choice
More often than not you will find a combination of both More often than not, you will find a combination of both
types of routing in any network that has a moderate level of complexity
Trang 7Dynamic Routing Protocols
A routing protocol g p
– is a set of processes, algorithms, and messages that are used to exchange routing information and populate the routing table with the routing protocol's choice of best paths g p p
The purpose of a dynamic routing protocol is to:
- Discover remote networks
- Maintaining up-to-date routing information
- Choosing the best path to destination networks Abilit t fi d b t th if th t th i l il bl -Ability to find a new best path if the current path is no longer available
ITE PC v4.0
7
Trang 8Dynamic Routing Protocols
• Algorithm is a finite list of steps used in accomplishing a task
• Algorithms are used for facilitating routing information and best path Algorithms are used for facilitating routing information and best path determination
– Routing protocol messages
• These are messages for discovering neighbors and exchange of routing information , and other tasks to learn and maintain accurate information about the network.
Trang 9Dynamic Routing Protocol Operation
All routing protocols have the same purpose - to learn about remote networks and to quickly adapt whenever there is a change in the topology
The method that a routing protocol uses to accomplish this depends upon the algorithm it uses and the operational characteristics of that protocol
In general the operations of a dynamic routing protocol can be described as
In general, the operations of a dynamic routing protocol can be described as follows:
– The router sends and receives routing messages on its interfaces.
– The router shares routing messages and routing information with other routers that are using the same routing protocol.
– Routers exchange routing information to learn about remote networks
– When a router detects a topology change the routing protocol can advertise this change to other routers.
ITE PC v4.0
9
Trang 10Dynamic Routing Protocols
Advantages of static routing
Advantages of dynamic routing
-It can backup multiple
interfaces/networks on a router
-Minimal CPU processing
Easier for administrator to
-Administrator has less work maintaining the configuration when adding or deleting networks.
-Easier for administrator to
understand
-Easy to configure
-No extra resources are needed
-Protocols automatically react to the topology changes.
-Configuration is less error-prone.
No extra resources are needed
-More secure
Disadvantages of static routing
g -More scalable, growing the network usually does not present a problem
Disadvantages of dynamic routing
-Network changes require manual
reconfiguration
-Configuration and maintenance is
time-consuming
Disadvantages of dynamic routing
-Router resources are used (CPU cycles, memory and link bandwidth) time consuming
-Does not scale well in large
Trang 11Dynamic Routing Protocols
ITE PC v4.0
11
Trang 12Classifying Routing Protocols
characteristics Examples include:
-RIP IGRP -IGRP -EIGRP OSPF -OSPF -IS-IS -BGP BGP
a single authority g y
Trang 13Classifying Routing Protocols
Dynamic routing protocols:
– EIGRP
• The advanced distance vector interior routing protocol developed by Cisco OSPF
Trang 14Classifying Routing Protocols
An autonomous system (AS) - otherwise known as a
routing domain - is a collection of routers under a
common administration
common administration
Because the Internet is based on the ASs concept, two
types of routing protocols are required: interior and
exterior routing protocols
Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP)
- Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP)
• are used for intra-autonomous system routing - routing inside an autonomous system
• IGPs are used for routing within a routing domain, those networks within the control of a single organization g g
– An autonomous system is commonly comprised of many individual networks belonging to companies, schools, and other institutions
• IGPs for IP include RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, OSPF, and IS-IS
Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGP)
- Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGP)
• are used for inter-autonomous system routing - routing between autonomous systems that are under the control
Trang 15A t t
Autonomous systems
An autonomous system (AS) is a collection of
networks under a common administration
networks under a common administration
sharing a common routing strategy
To the outside world, an AS is viewed as a single entity The AS may be run by one or more
operators while presenting a consistent view of routing to the external world
The American Registry of Internet Numbers
(ARIN), a service provider, or an administrator
assigns an identifying number to each AS This g y g
autonomous system number is a 16 bit number.
Routing protocols, such as Cisco’s IGRP,
require assignment of a unique, autonomous
Trang 16Autonomous systems
Autonomous systems
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl
Trang 17Autonomous systems
Autonomous systems
http://arin.net/education/asn_process/index.html
RFC 1930
AS just like IP, it needs
to apply from ARIN or the appropriate region and be unique on the
internet.
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the following block of AS numbers for private use (not to be advertised on the global Internet):
64512 through 65535
ITE PC v4.0
17
Trang 18Classifying Routing Protocols
IGP: Comparison of Distance Vector & Link
State Routing Protocols
Bellman-– incomplete view of network topology incomplete view of network topology.
• Distance vector protocols use routers as sign posts along the path to the final destination
• Distance vector routing protocols do not have an g p actual map of the network topology
– Generally, periodic updates.
• Some distance vector protocols periodically send complete routing tables to all connected neighbors.
Trang 19Classifying Routing Protocols
IGP: Comparison of Distance Vector &
Link state
– complete view of network topology is created p p gy
• The sign posts along the way from source to destination are not necessary, because all link- state routers are using an identical "map" of the state routers are using an identical map of the network
– updates are not periodic.
• After the network has converged, a link-state update only sent when there is a change in the topology
ITE PC v4.0
19
Trang 20Classifying Routing Protocols
Distance vector protocols work
best in situations where:
– The network is simple and flat
Link-state protocols work best in situations where:
– The network design is hierarchical,
p and does not require a special
hierarchical design.
– The administrators do not have
usually occurring in large networks.
– The administrators have a good knowledge of the implemented link- enough knowledge to configure
and troubleshoot link-state
– Specific types of networks, such
as hub-and-spoke networks, are
being implemented.
crucial.
– Worst-case convergence times
in a network are not a concern.
Trang 21Classifying Routing Protocols
Classful routing protocols
– Do NOT send Do NOT send subnet mask in routing updates subnet mask in routing updates,
– Do NOT support VLSM ,
– Classful routing protocols cannot be used when
a network is subnetted using more than one g
subnet mask,
• Tony: This does not mean you can not subnet the clasasfull network You can still subnet it but can only do it once and all subnet it, but can only do it once and all network needs to have the identical mask
– Routing protocols such as RIPv1 and IGRP
Classless routing protocols g p
– Do send subnet mask in routing updates.
– support variable length subnet masks (VLSM).
• In the figure, the classless version of the network is g , using both /30 and /27 masks in the same topology
• Tony: It means you can create the network with all different sizes of subnets They don’t need to have the same mask.
ITE PC v4.0
21
need to have the same mask
• Classless routing protocols are RIPv2, EIGRP, OSPF, IS-IS, BGP.
Trang 22Classifying Routing Protocols
Convergence is defined as when all routers’ routing Co e ge ce s de ed as e a ou e s ou g
tables are at a state of consistency
– The network has converged when all routers have complete and
f accurate information about the network
Convergence time is the time it takes routers to share
information, calculate best paths, and update their routing tables.
Routing protocols can be rated based on
the speed to convergence; the faster the
convergence, the better the routing
protocol
– RIP and IGRP are slow to converge
– EIGRP and OSPF are faster to converge EIGRP and OSPF are faster to converge
Trang 23Routing Protocols Metrics
To select the best path, the routing
protocol must be able to evaluate and
differentiate between the available paths
For this purpose a metric is used.
Metric
– A value used by a routing protocol to determine which routes are better than others.
Each routing protocol uses its own metric
– RIP uses hop count,
• The hop count refers to the number of routers The hop count refers to the number of routers
a packet must cross to reach the destination network
• For R3 in the figure, network 172.16.3.0 is two hops or two routers away
hops, or two routers away
– EIGRP uses a combination of bandwidth and delay,
– OSPF uses bandwidth (cost)
ITE PC v4.0
23
OSPF uses bandwidth (cost)
Trang 24Routing Protocols Metrics
Metrics used in IP routing protocols
• A simple metric that counts the number of routers
a packet must traverse
Trang 25Routing Protocols Metrics
The Metric Field in the Routing Table
Metric used for each routing protocol
-RIP - hop count
-IGRP & EIGRP - Bandwidth (used by
default), Delay (used by default), Load ,
Reliability
-IS-IS & OSPF – Cost , Bandwidth
(Cisco’s implementation)
Refer to the example in the figure The Refer to the example in the figure The
routers are using the RIP routing
protocol
– The metric associated with a certain
t b b t i d i th route can be best viewed using the
show ip route command
– The metric value is the second value in
the brackets for a routing table entry
– In the figure, R2 has a route to the
192.168.8.0/24 network that is 2 hops
Trang 26Routing Protocols Metrics
Load balancing oad ba a c g
– when two or more routes to the same
destination have identical metric values
– This is the ability of a router to
distribute packets among multiple same
cost paths p
Load balancing does not
Load balancing does not automatically means the interfaces
will get use equally
R2 load balances traffic to PC5 over two equal cost paths
??????
Trang 27Routing Protocols Metrics
Load balancing can be done either oad ba a c g ca be do e e e
per packet or per destination
– How a router actually load balances
packets between the equal-cost paths is
governed by the switching process
R2 load balances traffic to PC5 over two equal cost paths
Example
ITE PC v4.0
27
Trang 28Router Paths: Equal Cost Load Balancing
To solve this dilemma, a router will use Equal Cost Load
Balancing This means the router sends packets over the multiple
Balancing This means the router sends packets over the multiple
exit interfaces listed in the routing table.
– per-packet load balancing
Trang 29Load balancing with RIP
*Mar 1 19:10:29.646: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:29.646: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), g=192.168.13.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:30.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:30.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), g=192.168.15.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:31.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:31.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), g=192.168.13.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:32.218: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (FastEthernet0/0), d=255.255.255.255, len 604, rcvd 2
*Mar 1 19:10:32.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:32.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), g=192.168.15.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:33.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:33.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), g=192.168.13.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:34.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:34.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), g=192.168.15.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:35.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:35.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/1), g=192.168.13.2, len 60, forward
*Mar 1 19:10:35.974: IP: s=192.168.13.1 (local), d=255.255.255.255 (Serial0/1), len 72, sending broad/multicast
*Mar 1 19:10:36.654: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), routed via RIB
*Mar 1 19:10:36.654: IP: s=192.168.14.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.16.2 (Serial0/0), g=192.168.15.2, len 60, forward