11.17 From mean chart we see that 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 7th samples lies outside the control limits.. In a glass factory, the task of quality control was done with the help of mean x — and
Trang 1Sol Mean Chart
10 10
x
Mean Range of 10 sample ranges 58 5.8
10 10
R
R=∑ = =
As we have, for n=5, A2 =0.58, D3 =0, D4 =2.115
3-σ control limits for x – chart are:
2
2
UCL
44.2 0.58 5.8 47.567 LCL
44.2 0.58 5.8 40.836
x
x
x
X A R
X A R
X
= +
= + × =
= −
= − × =
= = Range Chart: 3-σ Control Limits for R chart are:
4 3
UCL 2.115 5.8 12.267
R R R
D R
D R R
= = × =
= = × =
= =
60 50
40
30 20
10
0
Mean Chart
Sample Number
FIG 11.17
From mean chart we see that 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 7th samples lies outside the control limits Hence the process is out of control This shows that some assignable causes of variation are operating which should be detected and removed
Trang 29 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Sample Number
FIG 11.18
Since all the points with in the control limits Hence the process is in statistical control
Example 2 The following are the mean lengths and ranges of lengths of a finished product from
10 samples each of size 5 The specification limits for length are 200 5 cm± Construct x – and R-chart and examine whether the process is under control and state your recommendation.
Assume for n = 5, A 2 = 0.577, D 3 = 0, D 4 = 2.115.
Sol In given problem specification limits for length are given 200 ± 5 cm Hence standard deviation is unknown
(1) Control Limits for x –-chart are:
Central limit, CLx= µ = 200
UCLx = µ +A R2 =200 0.577 4.7+ ×
=202.712; 47
10 10
R
R=∑ = LCLx = µ −A R2 =200 0.577 4.7− × = 197.288 R=4.7
(2) Control limits for R-Chart are:
4
3
UCL 9.941 2.115 4.7
CL 4.7
R R R
D R R
D R
= =
= = = ×
from control charts for mean and range, the process is in statistical control in R—-Chart because
all points lies with in the control limits where as in x—-chart, process is out of control because sample 5, 6 and 8 lies outside the control limits The process therefore should be halted to check
Trang 3whether there are any assignable causes If assignable causes found, the process should be re-adjusted to remove assignable cause
205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195
Sample Number Mean Chart
FIG 11.19
Range Chart
10 8 6 4 2 0
Sample Number
FIG 11.20
Example 3 In a glass factory, the task of quality control was done with the help of mean (x —
) and standard deviation σ charts 18 samples of 10 items each were chosen and then values ∑X and ∑S were found to be 595.8 and 8.28 respectively Determine the 3-σ limits for mean and standard deviation chart Given that n = 10, A 1 = 1.03, B 3 = 0.28, B 4 = 1.72, ∑S = 8.28.
Sol
No of samples 18
S
—
18
S
= 8.28
18 = 0.46 hence, 3-σ control limits for standard deviation chart are:
UCL–
S = B4.S— = 1.72 × 0.48 = 0.7912 LCLS– = B3.S— = 0.28 – 0.46 = 0.1288
CLS– = 0.46 3-σ control limits for mean chart (x—) are:
X— = ∑
18
x
= 595.8
18 = 33.1
Trang 4UCLX — = x— + A1σ
= 33.1 + 1.03 × 0.46 UCLX — = 33.57
LCLX — = x— – A1σ
= 33.1 – 1.03 × 0.46 LCLX — = 32.63
CLX — = 33.1
Example 4 If the average fraction defective of a large sample of a product is 0.1537, calculate the control limits when subgroup size is 2,000.
Sol Here, Sample size n = 2,000 for each sample
Average fraction defective = 0.1537 i.e., P = 0.1537
Q = 0.8463
Hence, 3–σ control limits for P-Chart are :
±3 PQ
P
n
UCLP = + 0.1537 0.8463×
0.1537 3
2,000 UCLP = 0.1537 + 0.02418 = 0.17788
LCLP = − 0.1537 0.8463×
0.1537 3
2,000 LCLP =0.1537 0.02418− =0.12952
CLP =0.5137
Example 5 The following data gives the number of defectives in 10 independent samples of varying sizes from a production process.
Draw the control chart for fraction defective.
Sol (In problem 4 sample size is fixed whereas in this problem sample size is variable) Since it is a problem of variable sample size so control chart for fraction defective can be drawn in two ways
(1) By first way, we set up two sets of control limits, one based on the maximum sample size, n=3125 and the second based on minimum sample size n=1, 250
(a) For n=3,125; UCL 0.200,= LCL=0.159
(b) For n=1, 250; UCL 0.212,= LCL=0.147
Trang 512 10 8 6 4 2 0
Sample Number
FIG 11.21 Control Chart for Fraction Defective
Since there are 4 points lies outside (based on minimum sample size) of control limits,
so process is of out of control
(2) By second way, 3-σ limit for each sample separately obtained by using formula
3 PQ
P n
±
where Total no of defectives
Total sample size
d P
n
∑
andn is corresponding sample size
17790
d
n
∑
∑
∴ ( )P Q = 0.1791 × 0.8209 = 0.1470231
n
P Q
n 3 ×
P Q
Trang 6500 400 300 200 100 0
Sample Size
Sample points corresponding to sample no 1, 2, 4, 7 and 9 lie outside the control limits Hence, process is out of control.
FIG 11.22
Example 6 A daily sample of 30 items was taken over a period of 14 days in order to establish attributes control limits If 21 defectives were found, what should be upper and lower control limits of the proportion of defectives?
Sol Since a sample of 30 items is taken daily over a period of 14 days
Total No of items inspected = 30 × 14 = 420
No of defective found = 21
n = 30
∴Average fraction defective P — = 21
420 = 0.05
n
+ where Q = − 1 P
3 0.05 3
30
P
n
UCLP = 0.05 + 3 × 0.0398 UCLP = 0.1694
3 P P
P
n
−
−
= 0.05 – 0.1194 < 0 (negative)
Example 7 The past record of a factory using quality control melthods show that on the average
4 articles produced are defective out of a batch of 100 What is the maximum number of defective articles likely to be encountered in the batch of 100, when the production process is in a state of control? Sol n = Sample size = 400
P = Process fraction defective = 4
100 = 0.04
Q = 1 – P = 0.96
Trang 7Let d be the number of defectives in a sample size of n i.e., np The 3–σ limit for number
of defectives are given by
( ) 3 ( )
E d ± s E d
400 0.04 3 400 0.04 0.96
= × ± × ×
16 3 15.36 16 3 3.9192
= ± = ± ×
16 11.7576
= ± =(4.2424, 27.7576)
Therefore if the production process is in a statistical control, the number of defective items
to be encountered in a batch of 400 should lie within the control limits, viz (4.2424, 27.7576), i.e., (4, 28) Hence the maximum number of defective items in this batch is 28.
Example 8 In a blade manufacturing factory, 1000 blades are examined daily Following information shows number of defective blades obtained there Draw the np-chart and give your comment?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
9 10 12 8 7 15 10 12 10 8 7 13 14 15 16
Date
No of
Defective
Sol Here n=10000, k=15 (sample no.)
If P denotes the fraction defectives produced by the entire process then
15 1000
P P kn
∑
×
∴ np=1000 0.011 11× =
Hence control limits are
( )
11 3 11 1 0.011 UCL 20.894
11 3 11 1 0.011 LCL 1.106
np
= =
= = − −
= + − −
=
= − − −
= − − −
= Since all the 15 points lies within the control limits, the process is under control
Trang 820 15 10 5 0
Date
FIG 11.23
Example 9 The number of mistakes made by an accounts clerk is given below:
Establish a suitable control chart and state how it should be used in future in order to control the mistakes of the clerk.
Sol The control chart to be used for the given problem is the number of defects chart i.e., C-chart.
Average no of mistakes
c— = 24 1.2
20 20
C
Thus the control limits for c—-chart are;
(i) UCL = c+ 3 c = 1.2 3 1.2 + = 4.49
(ii) CL = c— = 1.2
(iii) LCL = c− 3 c = 1.2 3 1.2 − = 2.09 ≈ 0
3 The number of mistakes during the 16th week lies outside the UCL the process is not
under control
Now to establish the suitable control chart for future, we homogenize the data for future control by eliminating the data corresponding to the 16th week
17 0.895
19
new
C = = Hence the revised control limits for c chart are:
UCL 3 0.895 3 0.895 3.73 LCL 3 0.895 3 0.895 1.94 0
17
19
C
= + = + =
= − = − = − ≅
= = =
Trang 9So the revised C-chart for revised control limit is in statistical control, i.e., all the points
lies within the control limits
8
6
4
2
0
Week
FIG 11.24
Example 10 During the examination of equal length of cloth, the following are the number of defects observed.
Draw a control chart for the number of defects and comment whether the process is under control
or not?
Sol Let the no of defects per unit (equal length) be denoted by c.
The average no of defects in 10 samples
36 3.6
20 10
c
c=∑ = = Hence 3–σ limit for c-chart are:
c±3 c =3.6 3 3.6± =3.6 3 1.8974± × =3.6 5.6922± UCLC– = 3.6 + 5.6922 = 9.2922 LCLC– = 3.6 – 5.6922 = – 2.0922 ≈ 0
CLC– = 3.6 (LCLC– = 0 because no of defects per unit cannot be negative)
Trang 108 6 4 2 0
Sample Number
FIG 11.25
Since all the points are within the control limits therefore the process is in statistical control
Example 11 An automobile producer wishes to control the number of defects per automobile The data for 16 such automobiles is shown below:
1 Set up the control lmits for c-charts.
2 Do these data come from a controlled process ? If not, calculated the revised control charts limits.
Sol Here k = 16
Average no of defects in 16 units
16
k
= ∑ = =
Thus, the control limits for c-chart are:
UCL = c+3 c = 2.625+3 2.625 = 2.625+4.861 = 7.486
CL = c = 2.625 LCL = c−3 c = 2.625 3 2.625− = 2.625−4.861 = −2.236 ≈ 0
10 8 6 4 2 0
Sample Number
FIG 11.26