Báo cáo nghiên cứu nông nghiệp " Research Priority Setting Workshop Agriculture Sector " docx

ro/02/2077 Key Issues ' Gdernhent ofvietnam wdts gwth it .g.iculture! .ontribution to GDPand dport3 ' Resedh .an fu.ther .ontribute to imp@ing .odpetitive.ess ofvielnam's agriculture sector I Good policies and priontiessetthe eNircnment for economi. & r*.rch management reform ! Prioriti€s paide.fcur to impa€ the efr€.tiv€nes (impact) or investm€nt in res€flh - focus on wh€re the m.jor b€nents will come frcm. t A difiicult ta.k so need to break it ddn so that it is undeBtddable and manageabre Key Issues lcontirued) ' Prioriti$ focus fi6ton outputs (i.e.Brcad Pbduct of Them.tic Are ) I N€€d tolink l€*arch intoGoV Rural D€v€lopment Outcomes thrcuah pdidins tansible b€nefits t There b a difreren.e between the Outpub of research and the research 3Fategi€s or inputs inb t The qustion is wh.t output3 could the rese.rch stratqier be applied to siv€ the sreate* impac: ' On.e Outplts prio.itised need to ddelop Output obiectivesand ttulti-di*iplinrtreseffih pbgrams to ehise objectivs Hielarchy of priorities & Re8o}rce Allocatlon t*. i :;- ;l 's- iq]EE:: s Research Priority Setting Workshop Agriculture Sector (o.pi Li6roqk, Fdr.{rr fchdiet Hanoi,December 14,2010 Agenda I Prioiity Setting lethodologt r Pre.€nt tion of Datr & Inlo.mation and S*tor AnalFis I Priority S€ttins: Workins Grcups Scorina usina t Summat& Closure workshop obj€ctives , Io dsln/VltRD to d.Er+ me.hdrism &r d€t€rniring dgri<ultuE reredt.h Ptlotirlzs ds d hatit for iryenm.nr .t .isions for high pdomy d4.i.ukurc re*drch prcaEEs ond prej€<.r, I To p.cporc o <tftfr tet of rc*orch ptio.ities rhe oqtkltture tecror utins obje.rire ond tubi.crie.to.a on.l infonatioa an t rerulB ofPftviols P onty setrina rcr|(Jh+s d tn€ sr6se.to. ,€v€t Cutting th€ Cak€? OR NEITHER? HO\A,TO DECIDE?? 70/02/201.L Pxpect€d tltorkshop Ouiput _FEAs|B|LTY.>- Priority Setting Methodology t Used wid€lt in m.ny ds€lopins .nd ddeloped ' Beed on 4 Independent Crir.ri, for evaluarion of , eotential Benefib{Hdbiced hd murhl) r Abilityto captur€ aen€fits (H@ easyto adoptr) , Rseaf.h ?or€rtiar (5 it a r ReseaEh Careity (Oo we have the rkillsl) I Th€ 4 .riteri. form the Priority S€ttina Pdorities Framework AREAS OF RESEARCII OPPORTUNITY I crops (or curtivation) ? Live*ock(Husbandry&Vet€rina.y) Fed Frccarnr & con,smlon R{ae, Nonr'mber Fo;'t tldud' Bre.di;{'q ed cotr.n*pn, 9!;poqn4. .eiE! Mu{.nN & con;;rren, {d 70/02/2071 ASSESSING POTDNTTAL BDNEFTTS ! Potential Benefits E red n.xinun o.Llkioncl henefiE fot vi.rnc6 (Eononic, enuircnn ntot, ond so.ict) fron t Potential benefits increase . The ldter the economic A'qth (prcdu.tion and , Opportunitig for in.EG.d erports dd/o. import , Tho grcat.f th€ reduction in cosB . lhe higher the aearch intenlity Th€ aEat.r th€ positiv. .nvircnmenel dd soci.l Score Pot€ntial Bere{its I Step | - Frcm lour p€rson.l vis sel*t th€ hish€st AROS and then the lMest ) Step 2- S.ore the HIGHEsTARO 7,dd the LOWEST ARO I . Finall, score the MEDIU M ARO'S using'.ores3 and 5. ft h.tth. Mtudton b6danh. rr. ohdyo drtlnrcr t.Md eot e d id 0&d ol xd4 h dr da ot b ldt9otu^r- i. ia naB ed in PV ic\| k n t* tnt I Step 3 - Reord your resoningroryour *oE on the , St€pa-Scorcscoll€.t.d Pot€ntial Beaefit (Irdpact) Procedure:Table G.oups I Discuss the Potential Benefitt arisina trcm edn ARO using prelimin.ry*oring to initiate I Think about the possible mdimum .ontribution each oftheARoswill have to rur.l ddelopment der the ne* 5 - l0 FaE - not the past blt th€ flture! I A3srme that there will be few obstacles in a.hiding the mdimum potential ! l,lake an ss€ssm€nt of the compeative total value oftJje* potenti.l benefitr for e&h ARO Factors For & Against Achleveuent of Porential Benefits {or Likellhooal ofUprake) ' Procedure: Trble grclps Benetrb:.riing rrom e,( h Axo u th€ poEnti.r lor erhAROin r€rms otrj b€nent (rarm€6) & 6,e rircry iFd of .doption , rbenti.r oorid.ar or .dnininr.tive ditn.ub or .6€ of rhe romprsiry orrh'd€h6L-(ompr€r po.cduEsor Existinr 6d.rnm€nr mlid€s th. 3up@*rd d€ drfFij i€! aeb( ASSESSIIVG FACTORS FOR & ACAINST ACHIEVEMENT OF POTENTIAL BENEFTTS r Factors For &AgainstAchi€vement of Potential Benent5 (o.Likelihood ofUptake) - 6fldr t,.erihood ofdrlre Esfir ofl(@s tt E dRh b.ineutitiea ' Lik€lihood of uptake i. greaaer . Thehi€herrdfastertheadoptionrate ' The morc e-ily ben€fitt aE re.oCnised , The morc frvour.ble Bd.mment poli.i€sand , th€ morc effe.tiye the denlion sFtem . Th€ high€. th. res*h int.n.ity and ld€l of . The h'Aher the inFm*ional .omper itivene\r 'n iride score Likelihood of Uptake ) scp | - Frem your peaonalview selectthe hiah4t ARO. ud then the lflest ' Shp 2 - S.ore the HIGHESTARO 7,ud the LOWESTARO l.Fin.llts@re the MEDIUMAROk usings.orcs I ud L rh.din.tth $tudtonBtountn th. ae aftEmr b!*!i,mor e o $d. sodd ol xot8 B d oa qro n vhpotu^. - tu lR n.o$,rd iD rovtu\| k n t* h t Step 3 - Re.od yoo. E-oninaaoryou. score on th. ' St.p ,l - S.orcs coll€.t.d 70/02/2077 Res€arch Potertial P.o.edurer Table Groups t Dis.uss the RseaEh Potential of ea.fi ARO using prcliminey3.orinsto initiate dis.ussion r ihink alout the impd that Bearch .ould m.lG to rchidinsthe potential benefis. - Cd GseaEh h€lp? , Think aboot E Eh pot€ntial in terms ot - , lsth.n.iorcsu€.l&r. orrese.(h,or alackorsood ' what re tfi€ n.io. Eseeh oppotunities (d3e or dlfllcurq of Edfth)l The R€seatch "s" culve ASSESSING RESEARCH CAPACITY ' Res€arch .apa.ity - 6tl€d, Vdrdht dbihy .o @dl.ritiEly d*rt|. res5 h dd.n.nlior ecd b de,iEr Es€cEh oulru6 ro uGrs ' Research .apa.ity ifrpB€s with: , The quality and breadth of 3kills available ' The ability to put togetler high performing ' The efii.iency ofiunning the re3edh I The quaiity of infrrstructure and equipment I The quality .nd efficiency of support st.fi.nd ASSESSING RESPARCN POTENTIAL ' 9cientili c potential - Efd s 1L f.t z6*h in e'o*,.dF i, tt. Eldont si.ntiti. f.lds dd th. ovcilobilhy of Ereor./l 6ols dnA c.hniques b Ue6on , S.ientifi< potential is hiaherl ' The fdter the rde of chanCe in relndt db.iplines , Th. get€rth€ lik lihood of *i€ntilic adnnce , The betbr ad more ac.esli5le the relenh bols , The hisher the atio of baic ed stat€ai. 6s Eh Score Research Potential I Step | - Fmm your peEonal virysele.tthe hirhest AROS and then the lNelt t Step 2- S.orc the HIGHESTARO 7,and the LOWEST ARO I. Finalln score th€ i4EOIU|l ARO's usinas.ores 3 and 5. ft.ofraf reqtuqto^h.o.ffii^. r[. EbnE djfEErco 6!e!i r^or e o 'id. lpddd.fnoa 6 ie nffi$drh r.ut rt.w t2k ta hpodo4 r., rt orh.n, ' Step 3 - Re.ord tour rcdoni.sforyours.orc on th. , Step a - Scoa.olleded Research Capacity Procedur€r Table Groups , Dis.$ithe Rese.rch C.p.ci9ofe&hARO usina preliminary scorin! to initi.t€ dis.ustion t Think about the available kndleds€ andskills of re<€fth !.i€ntisa invietmm ben€fits Cd w. r Think about f€s€arch .apa.itt in terms of: . ' Hry mud, imshdt (ru.ds rd r:.iritia or .qulpm€nt) hmr|readybanmad€r , what aE the skirrs s.ps dd hm cat *irl lt bc to llll 4 Score Reseatch CaDacitv ' skp | - Frem your peBonal viesele.ttn6 hieh.st AROs dd th€n the ldsr ' Step 2- Score the HIGHESTARO 7,and th. LOWEST ARO | . Finatlt scorc th. MEDTUM AROt usina s.ores 3 and 5. rn .in ot 6E !rutvtua t@.\dntn rre €rdr'E dftE,iq rtu.ninor so a 6dc 'pEod af*t6k qntcoLlnhDo,d-k ,d Dr"r tu i, rlurft, n n 69 ht I St€p 3 - Record you. resonina for your *oE on tfie I Step 4 -S<oB cott t€d ro/0212077 Workshop Output " Feasibility Workhop Output - Return oa hvestment 5 ntorkshop Oatput - Attractiv€ness 10t02t2011 POTNN'IIAL A.NO ARII,ITt Of' BENEFITS CAPTURE IN TH]' AGRICUI,TURA|, SfJ(-'TOIIS :\:l NN \$\\\'N .N PolENTIAL BUlrEltlS {}ROSS O!1pU1 Bt POTEN'TTAI, RI'N!!1lS l S', {F I i W PotENlIAl, BEill)lItS GROSS lJUl PUT l]Y ,"4,e",r,,+Jr!'J,3i9' 3'$"r"ir,i't,!"i",ir.fr.f PoTDN TIAL aENEFITS - GR I POTDNTIA' BENE'ITS GROSS OL1'PL]1 BY 't0t02t2011 ItorENanL BDNEI'irs D.ponr B\ srcl.rR H l"; PoTENTIAL DENEFITS - INPoRT BY SECTOR .$, ',.+.$.r|.S,S d.S,P PO'IIINTIAI, BE\IEFITS IMPORT BY PO?!N1'!\L BEIiE}'TS TXPORI IJ\ S!C'I OR PolENTLu, BDNEFTTS - In]tpi)Rl Bf . N' -!:i1 !i,, d t=l ^:.1 - - : - 10t02t201'l I'OT'NTIAI, BI]NEFITS I}IPORT BY iilr Porr\tt'\r BE\Iit11 - soct,\t, t!aNll'11' |M;;ifu t:!: :i \\\\ ABILITI OF BENEFIT CAPTURE ExIsrINc PRoBLEMS 'fr E'Z ExlsrIN_c PRoBLEUS H,sh labor fo.c in aericultuE ecior: ltnml indctri.l secior.a. not abeorb lote oflabor=> l.r' ae] Slow sifuctufe change: Cmp !$dlction st occnpies a Lo{ quahiy ol aeri ?&duct U.stabililiiyhsk : pnce/wearher Envircnnenial polhiion ' rhe confibuiion of loresiry in econoni. grwih toner :j): R ESEA RCH CR OP PRIORITTES Period of 2017 -2O2O Discussion Papet to( Agticultute sectol Pnofties Wo*shop Ha not, 14 December,20L0 Population . Population: 87 mil. persons . Population density: 260 person/km2 r Urban population; 28.11Yo . Rural population: 71.89olo Agricultural Share in GDP s r.tr .iom i 1e3t 4r arre3 6fi hlm ri mioij cDPtu br lkue cs. :oosl t-,. *L ACnrevement | . Agr. Grovlth rate susta n ng at 37o . Agriculture increase by 2,2Y0 . Forestry: 3.8% and . Fishery: 5.4% Land use structure . Agricultural Land accounting only for 290/0 of Natubl area r&r,r.nd rNon-&r.bd runEdcoppinq Structure of GDP, % : Share ofAgnculturc -_zk (icludingForestry and Fishery) in GDP tend io declining, accounting lor 22.7o/r in 2AO9 (400/0 in 1990) i;isi;ft;;;;da r;;; , Achievement, 2009 I *___ . Living standard imprcves; Poverty rate: 12.30/o ' GDP per capita: 1,100USD . Slart wilh program on ru?l deveoprlenl . Infrastructure improved ._l Top 10 Exported commodities 2008 I__ 1. Crude Orl 10.5 6. Wooden 2.78 2. Garment 9.10 7. Electronic 2.70 4.74 8 Coffee 2.11 4.56 1.60 2.89 10. Coai 1,.44 Area of Selected Crops 2000-2010 1000ha Export of Agricultural Products 2009 E Asi.,ftd . *br ! Foreaa r frkiE Area of Selected Crops 2000-2010 1000ha Planted Area of Selected Crops 2009 [...]... applEdresearch too andlessemphaszed basicresearch on ii) Research aboration qosrcssedbut has co has not net the requirenents ii, Research oukones werenot sustainable, the application nany rcsearch of outcomes not are stablq no rcsearch strategies 4 Objectivesfor Agriculture I I_ OverallTaroets Sustainable Agricult!re Prosperous Areas Rural Wealthy Farmers Opportunities Increasing investment Agriculture. .. are well developed and appliedwidelyin fishingpractices Rf SEARCII PRIORITIES I\ FISIINRYSECTOR RESEARCH PRIORITIIS IN FISHIRI SECTOR 3 lmpaclsofthe research and extension the sector to development farm level at Through exlension out channels the tesearoh results are delivered lhe farmers/users to veryfrequently Research the socialand on socio-economic issuesto assess lhe impactsof aquaculiure and fisheries... the getting income cover to salary involving anoomerexpenses, Lackof research strategies a great is hampering slrstainability the challenge, priorities of research 6 Challenges research for r Relatively decreasing investment in for (o/o agriculture of totalinvestment) 2000: 13.8 2005: 7.5 20081 6.s 2009: 6.3 r VNis andstillwill be Agriculture- based economy, Keyproducts for export, so needto are improve... t 4 k "/ rtl,4 aqa vtue h t.)rn^ | n, *tu r ciadi.h!'!]'!r!}rsq,]!] ouhG ciilri tr ( cnr,! rcurli 3 L0/02/2017 RESEARCH CAPABII,IT}' lnd!4w'ltrdia4Id.fu 4q4r dpa t.4 | ttklqDdd d4r,,h$n MUCH OF TI{ANKS FOR YOLTR ATTENT]ON rdi.btIt,6.tch d t4!tu4\ rd@qd natus4tui I i 8t4r,\ qat ri*q6 b6!q4 4 10to2t2011 THERESEARCH PRIORITIES FISHERYSECIOR IN ul'e*i9hfud'!qrttqjil THEREAEARCH PRIORITIES FISHERYSECTOR... speciesof fish, molluscand crLrstacean specieshave been domesticated usedfor and aquaculiure culturein freshwater, brackish watef and marineenvironmenis 10t02t2011 THERESEARCH PRIORITIES FISHERYSECTOR IN THERESEARCH PRIORITIES FISHERYSECTOR IN Differeni farming systems slch as rice/fish-shrimp, intensive shrimp Mekong and calfish; cageculturc marine and cage cullure opensea;etc.have in beendeveloped... speciesand tuna are the signif icantachievements in fisherysector REStrARCII PRIOR|TINS IN NISIII1RYSECTOR diversificationculture/fa ing m of systems wereintensively carried out.Thus,productivity ofthe lradition systems suchas integraied polycLrllure, riceand cum-f ish/shrimp systems were much enhanced IN IISHf,RY SXCTOR prioritiesin the next 2 Research periodResearch prioritiesin the nextperiod naual^^n6hi... Agriculture- based economy, Keyproducts for export, so needto are improve competitiveness profitfromfarming Higher r Higher income farmers for Harmonizing Agriculture- Rural and Farmers Development Challenges research for Relatively decreasing funding in for (yo agriculture research of totalstate expenditurc S&T) for , 1996:13.1 2000:9.1 2005:9.4 you Thank for your attention! r0/02/207r The Roles ofLiv€stock in... biologr€l active@frposilions ilm serving maler inpuls as a @stedofaqualicanimals tor olher industdes - Thanksfor your attention 5 't0t02t2011 lmpacts of the research and exlension to the 6ector development at farm level" ]HE RESEARCHPRIORIIES IN FISHEW SECTOR 6 ... Productivity ) Varietles; r lclvl (Fertilizers,Water, IPNlvl, rPM ) i) Post-harvest handling and , Hard-working skillFarmers VNAgriculture: Constraints challenges and VNAgriculture: Constraints challenges and - Production mainly is based natural on (need advantages market oriented) - Themainshare agriculture is crop in GDP production production ha is per , Value agricultural of low(1,100USD/ha) Producton is cost... Higher investment agricultural in Science Technology & Research Priorities 1 Plant Breeding 2 Integrated Technology focusing improving on effediveness input(s€eds, fertilizers, labour, of harvest Handlings 3 Post 4 Natural resource management 5 Food safety 6 Climate change mitigation adaptation and (Value 7 Produdion models policy and Chain) Develpment - Sector' s value increase 2,60/o/year, at of which food . Re8o}rce Allocatlon t*. i :;- ;l 's- iq]EE:: s Research Priority Setting Workshop Agriculture Sector (o.pi Li6roqk, Fdr.{rr fchdiet Hanoi,December 14,2010 Agenda I Prioiity Setting lethodologt r Pre.€nt tion. Enphastzed too nuch on the applEd research and less emphaszed on basic research ii) Research co aboration has qosrcssed but has not net the requirenents ii, Research oukones were not sustainable,. expenses, . Lack of research strategies is a great challenge, hampering the slrstainability of research priorities Challenges for research r Relatively decreasing in investment for agriculture