Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 27 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
27
Dung lượng
342,83 KB
Nội dung
The Green Light / 207 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon prosperity.Thisiswhycapitalismhassucceeded,andoth- ereconomicsystemshavefailed. In time, I thinkit is likely that our perceptions will shift so that we begin to truly recognize the economic contribution that our individual marketplace decisions make. Someday,the majority of peoplewill bevaluedin economic terms not for what they directly produce, but fortheirparticipationinconsumptionmarkets.Ifwecan succeed in gradually extending that participation to the billions ofpeoplewhoarenow trappedinpoverty—and do so in a way that creates incentives to conserve re- sources and minimize environmental impact—we may findthattheresultingconsumerdemandiscapableoffu- eling an engine that can drive us to unprecedented eco- nomicheights. The Green Light The natural cycle in the tunnel is stable and reinforcing. The vast majority of the consumers in the tunnel now glowwithapredominantlygreenlight.Astimepasses,the collectiveintensityofthelightscontinuestograduallyin- crease. Suddenly, we see that vast numbers of dim green lights have begun to stream into the tunnel. These new lights have barely enough intensity to make it past the threshold,butonceinside,theyjointheriveroflightsasit courses overthe panels onthe tunnelwalls. At first, we sensethatthebusinessesinthetunnelarestrainingsome- what to meet this new demand, but as time passes, the cycleagainstrengthens.Thecollectiveintensityofthelight THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 208 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon in the tunnel begins to quickly increase. We also notice that,overtime,eachofthenewdimlightsisverygradually becomingbrighter. As the newlightsstream into thetunneland arein- corporatedintoitsnaturalcycle,weseethatsomebright white lightsbegintopulse withnewenergy.New panels arenowappearinginmanyplacesonthetunnelwallsthat wereoncedark.Theentrepreneursandbusinessownersin the tunnel are responding to the rapidly increasing de- mand. As the number of lights continues to increase, the speed with which panelsareupdatedand thenumber of newpanelsappearingonthetunnelwallsseemstoaccele- rate. Although we had perceived the tunnel as being al- mostinfinitelyvast,itnowappearsthatthewallsarecom- pletelycoveredwithpanels. Evenaswesensethis,however,thetunnelitselfbe- ginstoexpand.Asnewpanelsrapidlyfillthespacesonthe expandingtunnelwalls,wenoticethatsomeofthebrigh- testwhitelightsarenowradiatingwithanunprecedented intensity.Still,astheever-increasingcycleoflightcontin- ues to parade through the expanding tunnel, we sense stronglythatitisthe seeminglyinfinite number ofgreen lights thattrulyencapsulates the collective energy, enter- priseandhopeofallhumanbeings. CopyrightedMaterial– Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon APPENDIX / FINAL THOUGHTS AretheideaspresentedinthisbookWRONG? (Opposingargumentsandmyresponses)…. Page 210 TwoQuestionsWorthThinkingAbout…… Page 223 Wherearewenow?F ourPossibleCases…… Page 224 TheNext10-20years:SomeIndicatorsto WatchFor.…………………………………… Page 227 OutsmartingMarx…………………………… Page 237 TheTechnologyPara dox…………………… Page 239 MachineIntelligenceandtheTuringTest……. Page 241 THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 210 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Are the ideas presented in this book WRONG? (Opposing arguments with responses) In this section I have listed some of the arguments that maybemadeagainsttheideasinthisbook,togetherwith myresponses.Theseareeitherconventionalargumentsor thingsIhavethoughtoforseenelsewhere. Theeconomy will always create new jobs; we will never have structural unemployment as a result of ad- vancing technology Thisistheideabehindthe“Ludditefallacy”whichIdis- cussedatsomelengthinChapters2and3(seepages95 and 131). At present, I suspect that most economists wouldprobablybelikelytoagreewiththisstatementand, therefore, disagree with what I have suggested in this book.Here,inanutshell,ismyargumentforwhyIthink wewillendupwithaseriousunemploymentproblem: Astechnologyadvancesandindustriesautomate,this improvestheefficiencyofproductionandtendstomake the products and services produced by those industries more affordable. That leaves more purchasing power in thepocketsofconsumers.Thoseconsumersthengoout andspendthatextramoneyonallkindsofproductsand servicesproducedbyavarietyofindustries.Someofthose industries are relatively labor intensive, so they have to hire more workers to meet this demand—andso overall employmentremainsstableorincreases.Thisisthereason Appendix / Final Thoughts / 211 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon that, historically, technology has not led to sustained, widespreadunemployment. Myargumentisthatacceleratingautomationtechnol- ogywillultimatelyinvademanyoftheindustriesthathave traditionallybeenlaborintensive.Additionally,theprocess of creative destruction will destroy old industries and createnewones,andveryfewofthesenewindustriesare likelytobelaborintensive.Asaresult,theoverallecono- mywillbecomelesslaborintensiveandultimatelyreacha “tipping point.” Beyondthis point, the economy will no longerbeabletoabsorbtheworkerswholosejobsdueto automation: businesses will instead invest primarily in moremachines.Ihavealsoarguedthatthisprocesswillbe relentless,andifitisnotaddressedbysometypeofgov- ernmentpolicy,wemayultimatelyseeaprecipitousdrop inconsumerspendingasasubstantialfractionofthepop- ulation loses confidence in its future income continuity. That,ofcourse,wouldresultinevenmoreunemployment andadownwardspiralwouldensue. THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 212 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon If technology resulted in unemployment, everyone would already be out of a job because technological progress has been going on for hundreds of years Thisreallyjustamountstosaying“ithasn’thappenedyet, so it will never happen.” History has proven time and againthat,wheretechnologyisconcerned,somethingcan beimpossiblesincethedawnofcivilizationandthensud- denly, in the blink of an eye, become possible.Revolutio- narytechnologies,suchastheairplaneandnuclearpower, wherealldismissedas being impossible evenbypreemi- nentscientistswhowereinvolvedintheresearchthatled totheirdevelopment. Today,mostofusacceptthattechnologywillcontin- uetoadvanceandproducethingsthatwemightcurrently viewasimpossible.However,westillthinktoonarrowly. Weacceptthattherewillbenewtechnologies,newprod- uctsandnewindustries,butmostofusarenotprepared toacceptthatallthiswillchangethebasiceconomicrules that we take for granted. But why wouldn’t that be the case?Isthereafundamentalreasonwhyacceleratingtech- nologyshouldimpactnearlyeveryaspectofourlives—but notimpactthewaytheeconomyworks?AsIpointedout inChapter2,advancinginformationtechnology—because itenabledthecreationanddistributionoffinancialderiva- tives—hascertainlyplayedanimportantroleintheseveri- tyofthecurrenteconomiccrisis.Isuspectthatthisisjust a preview of the economic impacts that technology will haveinthefuture. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 213 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon The population is aging. Once the baby boomers re- tire, we will have a worker shortage not unemploy- ment Innearlyallthedevelopednations(andalsoinChina),the populationsarerapidlyagingandretirementplansarepro- jected tocome under intensepressure,astoofewyoung workers have to support too many older retired people. Doesthisimplythatthereislikelytobeanoverallshort- ageofworkersaslargenumbersofolderpeopleleavethe workforce? I think it is certainly possible this may be a counteractive force that might tend to delay the impact fromautomationtoacertainextent.Herearesomethings toconsider: Theimpactofautomationonaspecificjobcategoryis reallynotrelatedtothenumberofworkersavailableto perform that type of job. Once technology advances tothepointwhereatypeofjobcanbeautomated,the machinestodothiscaneasilybereplicated.Machines donotneedtobeeducatedortrained,andsotheyare notsubjecttothebottlenecksthatcreateshortagesof workersinfieldssuchasnursing.Therefore,inconsi- deringtheoverallimpactofmachineautomation,the important criterion is not the number of workers availablebut thetypes of jobsthat canbe automated. Totheextentthatthereareworkershortageswithina specific job category, that would actually tend to in- creasetheincentiveforautomationtechnologiestobe developedinthatarea.WealreadyseethiseffectinJa- panwheresignificantworkisbeingtodonetodevelop THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 214 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon robots capable of assisting with care of the elderly population. Thecurrentconsensusviewseemstobethat,asare- sult of the 2008-9 financial crisis (and its impact on 401k plans), many workers will remain in the work- forcelongerthanoriginallyplanned.Thiswillgiveau- tomationtechnologylongertocomeintoplaybefore anyworkershortagesmaterialize. Eveniftheaging populationdoestendtoretardun- employment,thiswould,ofcourse,simplybeadelay- ingfactor—notalong-termsolutiontotheproblem. Ithinkwecancertainlyexpecttoseeworkershortag- esinsomeareas,butthismayverypossiblybecombined withanoverallunemploymentproblem.Thedangeristhat increasingstructuralunemploymentwillunfoldinparallel withthedemographicproblem.Isuspectthatmostofthe projectionsregardingtheimpactofagingpopulationsas- sume reasonably full employment among younger work- ers.Ifthisdoesnotturnouttobethecase,thesituation willobviouslybemuchworse.AsIpointedoutinChapter 3, a payroll tax-based system for supporting retirement programsmightbecomecompletelyunsustainable. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 215 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Businesses will never fully automate because ofthe high initial capital investment andthe lack of flexibil- ity this implies There are somevalid pointshere, and I think thatthese factorsmay,inmanycases,servetoretardtheprocessof automation—butinthelongruntheywillnotpreventit. Somebusinesseswillcertainlydelayautomationbecauseof thehighcapitaloutlaysrequired.However,overtime,ma- chines will become more affordable, more reliable, and moreflexible.Atsomepoint,astechnologyadvances,ma- chineswillbegintooutperformworkerstotheextentthat a non-automated business will not be competitive. Con- siderthecaseofonlinebanking:itgenerallyoffersarange ofservices,suchasautomaticbillpaying,thatcouldnotbe offeredbyahumanbankteller. Keep in mind that automation offers cost benefits beyond simply eliminating wages. There are also payroll taxes, benefits, vacationtime, managementissues (and if youeliminateworkers,youcaninmanycasesalsogetrid ofthefirstlinemanagers),etc.Therearealsosafety and liability issues; consider the safety advantages of a fully automatedwarehouse. Theneed for technicaland economic flexibilitymay alsotendtoholdbackautomationforatime.Ifabusiness investsheavilyinspecificmachinestoproduceaparticular productandthenthatproductdoesnotsellwell,itmaybe stuckwith equipment itdoes notwant.The obviousan- swertothatis that,inthefuture,automationtechnology willbemoreflexibleandeasytoadapttodifferentprod- ucts.Ithinkthemanufacturersofautomationequipment THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 216 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon arefullyawareofthisissueandwillbuildincreasinglyflex- ibleproducts. Thereisalsotheissueofeconomicflexibility:abusi- nessthatemploysworkerscanlaythemoffinslowtimes, while a more automated business will be stuck with its machines.Again,Ithinkthat,inthelongrun,astechnolo- gy advances, businesses that don’t automate will simply not be able to compete: and that reality will overwhelm otherconsiderations. Anotherpointisthatbothofthesefactors(highcapi- talcostsandtheneedforflexibility)maytendtopushthe next wave of automation toward software applications geared toward eliminating knowledge worker jobs. Soft- ware is typically more flexible and has a lower up front costthanexpensivemechanicalautomation.AsInotedin Chapter 2, automation of these jobs, together with off- shoring, may mean diminishing prospectsfor knowledge worksandcollegegraduatesingeneral. Machines may take over most unskilled labor, but they will never be able to do skilled or professional jobs that require lots of training and education I think this is a dangerous misconception that stems, in part, from a certain amount of hubris on the part of peoplewhoare welleducated.Theconventional wisdom isthatafencehasbeenerectedwithinoursociety.Onthe lush, garden side of the fence, are workers who have strongeducationsandtraining.Thesepeoplearebeneficia- riesoftheinformationage.Onthetoxicwastelandsideof the fence, are relatively unskilled workers. These people [...]... both technology and globalization They often survive by stringing two or three part time jobs together or work in lowwage jobs with fewbenefits The obvious solution is for us to find a way to offer these people additional training—so they can hop over to the good side ofthe fence I think that the problem with this scenario is that the fence is goingto move, and it may move very rapidly The good side of. .. society andeconomy would be dramatically negative In the United States, two thirds of workers and therefore consumers—do not have a college degree While efforts to improve education and training are laudable, the reality is that this is not likely to offset the impact of geometrically acceleratingtechnology In fact, I think that the Copyrighted Material – Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon THE LIGHTS... investors would provide the enormous sums necessary to realize thetechnology Advanced nanotechnology almost certainly lies further in the future than the automation technology that is likely to threaten routine jobs So it won’t arrive in time to solve the problem in any case The Heads in the Sand Objection If other arguments against the ideas I have presented here prove insufficient, then I suspect that... well be office and knowledge workers who are the primary initial targets of these newtechnologies Offshoring and automation begin to penetrate small business and possibly combine to capture higher value jobs I suspect that most economists discount the potential for outsourcing to invade the small business arena because they assume that the costs and inconveniences associated with setting up offshore... Amazon THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 222 tion to the idea that machines might someday begin to think and reason was first articulated by the founder of computer science, Alan Turing (Please see the last section of this Appendix) Turing initiated the field of artificial intelligence with his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Here’s howTuring expressed what he called the “Heads in the Sand”... the price of most goods fell dramatically, consumers would still need an adequate income Today, we already have digital products that have a zero marginal cost of production These products are, for the most part, not free because they have intellectual property rights attached to them We can expect the same if advanced nanotechnology arrives someday If there isn’t a way to protect and profit from these... wrong: The argument could be fundamentally wrong This implies that the economy is capable of growing and advancing technologically basically forever, without creating an unemployment problem In other words, even 500 years from now, when society presumably has technology that is incomprehensible to us today, the economy will still provide employment for the vast majority of people in the population The. .. see the section “Where are we now? Four Possible Cases” later in the Appendix for more on this In the future, wages/income may be very low because of job automation, but technology will also make everything plentiful and cheap so low income won t matter This is an idea that is often expressed in conjunction with a discussion of advanced nanotechnology Nanotechnology may one day offer the promise of. .. Amazon THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 224 Where are we now? Four Possible Cases On the next page, I’ve reproduced the scary graph from Chapter 3, which shows the potential impact of machines throughout the economy becoming more autonomous Remember that this graph shows average income for a “median range” of people in the economy; it’s based on what statisticians would call a “truncated mean” with the poorest... back on track and continue climbing the graph 2 If the shape ofthe graph is basically correct, but we are still far away from the point where automation is going to become important, then we should, likewise, get back on track and continue climbing 3 If we are somewhere close to the point where the dotted and solid lines diverge, then we are going to see increasing economic impacts, and we will have . dramatically negative.In the UnitedStates,twothirds of workers and thereforeconsumers—donothaveacollegedegree.While effortstoimproveeducation and trainingarelaudable, the realityisthatthisisnotlikelytooffset the impact of geo- metrically accelerating technology. Infact,Ithinkthat the THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 2 18. have strongeducations and training.Thesepeoplearebeneficia- ries of the informationage.On the toxicwastelandside of the fence, are relatively unskilled workers. These people Appendix. Amazon havebeenheavilyimpactedbyboth technology and globa- lization.Theyoftensurvivebystringingtwoorthreepart timejobstogetherorworkinlowwagejobswithfewben- efits. The obvioussolutionisforustofindawaytooffer thesepeopleadditionaltraining—sotheycanhopoverto the goodside of the fence. Ithinkthat the problemwiththisscenarioisthat the fenceisgoingtomove, and itmaymoveveryrapidly. The good side of the fenceisgoingtocontract, and increasingnum- bers of well-educatedworkersaregoingtofindthemselves suddenlyon the toxicside.AsIpointedoutinChapter2, we