Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 20 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
20
Dung lượng
302,69 KB
Nội dung
THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 234 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Trouble in China IfconsumerspendingintheU.S.andtherestofthe de- veloped world remains depressed, China may ultimately find itdifficultto sustain thegrowthit needsto keep its workersemployed.GiantretailersintheUnitedStateswill likelycontinuetoexertextremepressureonChineseman- ufacturers to produce ever cheaper, better and more so- phisticated products. These businesses may have little choicebuttoturnincreasinglytoautomationasawayto improveefficiencyandtrimcosts.Inasocietythatoffers littleinthewayofasafetynet,thesavingrateamongChi- neseworkersmightremainveryhigh,orperhapsevenin- crease, in spite of the government’s efforts to somehow spur consumer spending. All this may lead to increased incidentsofcivilunrestandinstability. Continuing Instability in the Financial Markets Aseveryoneknows,thecurrentcrisisbeganwiththesub- primemeltdown.Acasecancertainlybemadethatstag- natingwagesplayedaroleinthecauseofthatmeltdown. Obviously,lowwagesmadeitdifficultforthesepeopleto repaytheirloans. Beyondthat,Ithink itisalsotruethat,to some de- gree,themotivationbehindsubprimeloanprogramswas theideaofthe“ownership society.” Basically, inlightof increasingevidencethatwagespaidtoaveragepeopleno longerofferalikelypathtosuccess,weturnedinsteadto thepromiseofrealestatespeculationandtriedtoextendit toasmanypeopleaspossible. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 235 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Itdidn’tturnoutwell,andthelessonisthatvirtually allassetvaluesinoureconomyarebasedontheassump- tionthatwearegoingtocontinuehavingavibrantmass marketeconomysupportedbyrobustconsumerspending. Ifthatbasicassumptionisthreatened,weareverylikelyto see increased risk, volatility and, ultimately,deflating val- ues. The “ownership society” idea just isn’t workable— consumersneedincomes(andconfidenceinthecontinuity of those incomes) to support the sustained discretionary spending that powers the economy. Remember: Every- thingthatisproducedbytheeconomyis ultimatelycon- sumedbyindividualhumanbeings. * Ugly and irrational political battles IftrendssimilartotheonesI’velistedabovedodevelop, andifthereisnocoherentunderstandingandreasonable consensus regarding what is occurring, a dark scenario may develop. Political battles will become even more heated,partisanandirrational.Manypoliticiansmayactin evenmorepurelyself-interestedwaysastheycometoge- nuinelyfearthespecteroftheirownunemployment. Conservatives will likely cling to the idea that taxes should be cut on business even as it becomes clear that such cuts will result in little or no job creation. Liberals * GDP is equaltoPersonalConsumer Spending + Business Invest- ment (which occurs in anticipation of future consumer spending) + NetExports(consumer spendinginothercountries) +Government Spending(moneythatthegovernment spendstoprovideservicesto individual people). It all comes down to individual people buying stuff. THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 236 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon may callfor increased job training evenastheprospects formoreeducatedworkersarediminishing.Theymayalso throw their weight behind organized labor, and this will leadtoacontinuingbalkanizationoftheworkforceintoa protectedeliteversusafarlargernumberofhighlyvulner- ableworkers. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 237 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Outsmarting Marx Thecentralthesisofthisbookisthat,astechnologyacce- lerates, machine automationmay ultimately penetrate the economy to theextent thatwages no longer provide the bulkofconsumerswithadequatediscretionaryincomeand confidenceinthefuture.Ifthisissueisnotaddressed,the resultwillbeadownwardeconomicspiral. Itmustbeacknowledgedthatthisideaisquitesimilar tothepredictionsthatweremadebyKarlMarxinthemid tolate1800s.Marxpredictedthatcapitalismwouldsuffer from a relentless “accumulation of capital,” resulting in massive unemployment and wages that would be driven downbelowsubsistencelevel.Thisinturnwouldresultin diminishedconsumerdemand,fallingprofitsandultimate- lyeconomiccrisisorevencollapse. Iftheargumentsinthisbookprovecorrect,thenwe may bein thesomewhatuncomfortablepositionofcon- ceding that Marx was, at least in some ways, perceptive aboutthechallengesthecapitalistsystemwouldeventually encounter.That,ofcourse,doesnotmeanthatweshould consideradopting Marx’s solution. He advocated theab- olition of private property, acentrallyplanned economy, and perhaps most chillingly, the overthrow of govern- mentsanda“dictatorshipoftheproletariat.”Inthewake of the collapse of communism, these ideas have been shownunequivocallytobe non-starters. They deserveto besweptintothedustbinofhistory. Theanswertotheproblemisclearlytoadaptoursys- tem.Thefreemarketeconomyisnotanaturalphenome- THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 238 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon non.Itisreallyamachinethatwehavebuiltandrefined overcenturies:itisanenginethatisfundamentallydriven byincentives.Marxwantedtotakeasledgehammertothat engine.Ourjobistotuneit,andevenre-engineeritifne- cessary,sothatitwillcontinuetopowerprosperityindefi- nitely. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 239 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon TheTechnology Paradox Mostpeoplewhowatchmoviesorhavereadsciencefic- tionnovelsarefamiliarwiththepotentialparadoxesasso- ciatedwithtimetravel. Forexample,ifyouwereableto travelbackintimeandthendosomethingtopreventyour parents from meeting before you were born, or perhaps killayoungerversionofyourself,thenyouwouldpresum- ablyceasetoexist.Whileweobviouslydon’tneedtowor- ry too much about the practical problems of owning a timemachine,Ithinkthatthereisasomewhatanalogous issueassociatedwiththefutureoftechnology. Manytechnologistswhothinkdeeplyaboutthefuture believethatgenuinelyamazing thingsare possible.These visions include things such as truly intelligent machines and advanced nanotechnology that would allow us to transform matter, generate abundant clean energy and perhapscreatetangibleobjectswiththesameeasethatwe nowcreategraphicsonacomputerscreen.Thereisalsoa greatdealofspeculationaboutfantasticmedicaladvances thatmightcuremajordiseasesandperhapsevendramati- callyextendthehumanlifespan. * * While many diet books are a bit ambitious in terms of what they promise,RayKurzweilandTerryGrossmantakethingstoanentirely newlevel with two books (Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever and Transcend: Nine Steps to Living Well Forever) based on the premise that ifyou can justhold on longenough to make ittothe point of extraordinary technological acceleration (the “Singularity”), you should be abletotakeadvantageofthecontinuous medicalad- vancesthatwillensue,andthenmanagetobecomeessentiallyimmor- tal. You won’t find many other books that discuss subjects such as THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 240 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon TheessentialpointIwanttomakeisthatallthistruly amazingstuffwillrequireenormousinvestment.Certainly,tril- lionsofdollarswillneedtobeinvestedinordertomake such technologies a reality. As I have pointed out throughout this book, such investment cannot occur in theabsenceofrobustconsumerdemand.Withinthecon- textofthefreemarketeconomy,noinvestorwouldmake suchaninvestmentunlessheorsheanticipatesavibrant marketfortheresultingtechnology. IwouldalsoarguethatthelevelofautomationIhave beendiscussinginthebook—inotherwords,theideathat a substantial fractionof routine,average jobs willbeau- tomated—representsamuchlowerpointonthetechnolo- gycurvethanall thisreallyfantasticstuff.Therefore,itwill occurfirst.AsIhavepointedout,iftechnologypermanently eliminateshugenumbersofworkers—and createsperva- sive fear in the minds of those who still have jobs— consumer demand would surely suffer dramatically. The bottomlineisthat,ifoureconomicmodelisnotadapted to the new reality, technology could essentially kill itself off.Itisquiteeasytoimagineascenarioinwhichtechnol- ogyreachedacertainpoint,butthensloweddramatically orevenhaltedbeforegettingtothereallyamazingthings. advancedartificialintelligenceandcybernetics—andalsohaveplenty ofrecipesforhealthydishes. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 241 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Machine Intelligence andthe Turing Test Thisbookhasprimarilybeenconcernedwiththepotential economicimpactofwhatresearchersinthefieldofartifi- cialintelligencewouldcallnarrowAI.Inotherwords,ma- chinesandsoftwarethatarecapableofsophisticatedanal- ysis,decisionmakingandreasoningwithinarelativelynar- rowfieldofapplication.Suchmachinesarenotreallyintel- ligentinanymeaningfulsense—buttheyarehighlycom- petentatperformingspecificcomplextasksandmaywell exceedthecapabilityofahumanworker. NarrowAIapplicationsarealreadyinwidespreaduse; expertsystemssuchasthesoftwarethatcanautonomous- lypilotandlandairlinersandmanyoftheadvancedfea- tures built into Internet search engines and multiplayer role playing games fall into this area. Narrow AI is the practicalsideofartificialintelligence,andforthatreason, we can expect that it will attract substantial commercial investment.AsIhavearguedinthisbook,machinesexhi- bitingvastlyimprovednarrowAIcapabilitymayultimately be poised to permanently take over a great many of the moreroutinejobsintheeconomy. WhilenarrowAIisincreasinglydeployedtosolvereal worldproblemsandattractsmostofthecurrentcommer- cialinterest,the HolyGrailofartificial intelligenceis, of course, strong AI—the construction of a truly intelligent machine.TherealizationofstrongAIwouldmeantheex- istenceofamachinethatisgenuinelycompetitivewith,or perhaps evensuperiorto,a human beinginitsabilityto reasonandconceiveideas.TheargumentsIhavemadein THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 242 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon thisbookdonotdependonstrongAI,butitisworthnot- ingthatiftrulyintelligentmachineswerebuiltandbecame affordable, the trends I havepredicted here would likely beamplified,andtheeconomicimpactwouldcertainlybe dramaticandmightunfoldinanacceleratingfashion. ResearchintostrongAIhassufferedbecauseofsome overlyoptimisticpredictionsandexpectationsbackinthe 1980s—long before computerhardware was fast enough to make true machine intelligence feasible. When reality fellfarshortoftheprojections,focusandfinancialback- ingshiftedaway fromresearchintostrongAI.Nonethe- less,thereisevidencethatthevastlysuperiorperformance andaffordabilityoftoday’sprocessorsishelpingtorevital- izethefield. ResearchintostrongAI canberoughlydivided into twomainapproaches.Thedirectcomputationalapproach attemptstoextendtraditional,algorithmiccomputinginto therealmof true intelligence. This involves the develop- ment of sophisticated software applications that exhibit generalreasoning.Asecondapproachbeginsbyattempt- ingtounderstandandthensimulatethehumanbrain.The Blue Brain Project, 57 a collaboration between Switzerland’s EPFL (one of Europe’s top technical universities) and IBM, is one such effort to simulate the workings of the brain.Onceresearchersgainanunderstandingofthebasic operating principles of the brain, it may be possible to build an artificial intelligence based on that framework. Thiswouldnotbeanexactreplicationofahumanbrain; instead,itwouldbesomethingcompletelynew,butbased onasimilararchitecture. Appendix / Final Thoughts / 243 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon When might strong AI become reality—if ever? I suspectthatifyouweretosurveythetopexpertsworking inthefield,youwouldgetafairlywiderangeofestimates. Optimistsmightsayitwillhappenwithinthenext20to30 years. Amorecautiousgroup would placeit 50or more yearsinthefuture,andsomemightarguethatitwillnever happen. True machine intelligence is an idea that, in many ways,intrudesintotherealmofphilosophy,andforsome people,perhapsevenreligion.Whatisthenatureofintel- ligence? Is intelligence algorithmic? Can it be separated fromconsciousnessorself-awareness?RogerPenrose,one of the world’s top mathematical physicists, has written severalbooks 58 suggestingthattrueartificialintelligenceis unattainableusingconventionalcomputersbecausehebe- lieves that intelligence (or at least consciousness) has its rootsinquantummechanics—theareaofphysicsthatgo- vernstheprobabilistic,andseeminglybizarre,interactions thatoccurbetweenparticlesofsubatomicsize. IfstrongAIdoesarrive,howwillweknow?Thatisa question that was first askedbyAlan Turing nearlysixty years ago. Turing, a legendaryBritish mathematician and codebreakerduringWorldWarII,isoftenconsideredto bethefounderofcomputerscience.In1950,Turingpub- lishedapaperentitled“ComputingMachineryandIntelli- gence,”inwhich he proposed atesttoanswer theques- tion:“Canmachinesthink?” Turing’stestwasbasedonagamepopularatparties at the time. In today’s terms, it amounts to a three-way instant messaging conversation. One participant is a hu- [...].. .THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 244 man judge The other participants are another person and a machine—both of whom attempt to convince the judge that they are human by conducting a normal conversation If the judge can’t tell which participant is which, then the machine is said to have passed the Turing Test The Turing Test is perhaps the most well-known and accepted method for measuring... Jeremy Rifkin, The End of Work: The Decline ofthe Global Labor Force and the Dawn ofthe Post-Market Era, NewYork, Penguin Group, 1995 49 Chapter 4: Transition 51 Cornelia Dean, “Scientific Savvy? In U.S Not Much”, NewYork Times, August 30, 2005, web: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html 52 See Chris Anderson’s The LongTail: Whythe Future of Business is Selling Less of More, a book... available @ Amazon About / Contacting the Author Martin Ford is the founder of a Silicon Valley-based software development firm He has over 25 years experience in the fields of computer design and software development He holds an MBA degree from the Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA and an undergraduate degree in computer engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor He has a blog... populations, and globalization will change the wayyou live and work, NewYork, St Martin’s Press, 2008 39 Thomas L Friedman, The World is Flat: A Brief History ofthe Twenty First Century, NewYork, Farrar, Strause and Giroux, 2005, 2006 40 China’s high saving rate the result of government policy, see: Eamonn Fingleton, In the Jaws ofthe Dragon: America’s Fate in the Coming Era of Chinese Hegemony, NewYork, St... fraction ofthe jobs that support consumers, the viability of capitalism will ultimately be threatened—unless, of course, our economic rules are adapted to reflect the new reality These issues are beyond the scope of this book For a good introduction to this area, I’d recommend reading “Why the future doesn’t need us,” an article written by Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy for the April, 2000 issue of. .. the interference patterns of quantum electron waves”, Stanford News Service: http://newsservice.stanford.edu/news/2009/january28/small-012809.html 13 Many technologists believe that the exponential progress of information technology will ultimately level off In other worlds, the graph will somedaybecome an “s-curve,” somewhat similar in shape to the graph of human capability that appears later in the. .. However, there is no way to knowhowfar in the future this might occur, and there is little evidence to suggest it will happen anytime soon 14 For more on “quants” and the creation of exotic derivatives, see: Emmanuel Derman, MyLife as a Quant: Reflections on Physics and Finance, NewYork, John Wiley and Sons, 2004 15 Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist 16 James J Heckman and Paul A LaFontaine, The Declining... practice, the rules would need to be further refined, and it seems likely that a panel of judges would be required rather than a single person In my opinion, the main problem with the Turing Test is that it is, as Turing pointed out in his paper, an “imitation game.” What it really tests is the ability of an intelligent entity to imitate a human being—it is not a test of intelligence itself Presumably the. .. sense of security; it glosses over the obvious reality that cockroaches neither land aircraft nor defeat human beings at games of chess When machine capability is focused narrowly, the story is very different I think there is little doubt that in the coming years and decades, our definition of what constitutes “narrow” artificial intelligence is going to broaden quite dramatically If it broadens to the. .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second The MacIntosh and Lisa computers used the Motorola 68000 microprocessor with a rating of 1 MIPS 10 Calculating the amount in Bill’s pocket: Google makes this easy Just enter the following in the search box: 01 * 2 ^ ((1986-1975)/2) (replace 1986 with the desired year) 11 Ray Kurzweil, The Singularityin Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, NewYork, Penguin Group, 2005 12 “ “S” and “U” encoded . acentrallyplanned economy, and perhaps most chillingly, the overthrow of govern- ments and a“dictatorship of the proletariat.”In the wake of the collapse of communism, these ideas. Amazon 49 Blinder,AlanS.,“IsGovernmenttooPolitical?”ForeignAffairs,No- vember/December1997.Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19971101faessay 381 5/alan-s- blinder/is-government-too-political.html 50 JeremyRifkin, The End of Work: The Decline of the GlobalLaborForce and the Dawn of the Post-MarketEra,NewYork,PenguinGroup,1995. . many of the moreroutinejobsin the economy. WhilenarrowAIisincreasinglydeployedtosolvereal worldproblems and attractsmost of the currentcommer- cialinterest, the HolyGrail of artificial