Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 27 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
27
Dung lượng
343,74 KB
Nội dung
Acceleration / 99 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon require low and moderately skilled workers are being computerized, tomorrow it will be jobs performed by highlyskilledandeducatedworkers.Indeed,thisisalready happening among information technology professionals, where jobs that once requiredcollege degreesare simply vanishingintothecomputernetwork. Greenspan’ssuggestedsolutionisthatwedramatical- ly improve our elementary and secondary education sys- tems.WhilethatisagoalthatIcertainlysupport,theidea thatitwillsolvetheproblemissimplynotarealisticex- pectation.Even ifwe couldwavea magicwandand im- prove educationin theUnited States overnight,it would obviouslybeyearsbeforethosechildrenenterthework- force.Inthemeantime,computertechnologywillcontin- ueitsrelentlessadvance.ThesubtitleofChairmanGreen- span’sbookis“AdventuresinaNewWorld.”However,it appearsthat,likemosteconomists,hehasfailedtoperce- ivejusthownewthatworldreallyis. The reality is that the Luddite fallacy amounts to nothing more than a historical observation. Since things haveworkedoutsofar,economistsassumethattheywill always work out. For centuries, machines have conti- nuously become more sophisticated, and as a result, the productivity—and therefore the wages—of the average worker have increased. It stands to reason that if this processcontinuesindefinitely,atsomepointthemachines willbecomeautonomous, and the worker willno longer addvalue.Longbeforethatextremityisreached,however, theremustcomeatippingpointatwhichjoblossesfrom automation begin to overwhelm any positive impact on THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 100 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon employment from lower prices and increased consumer demand. (For more on this, please see pages 131-138 in Chapter 3). In light of unprecedented, geometrically ad- vancingcomputertechnology, theLuddite“fallacy” does notreallylookallthatfallacious. A More Ambitious View of Future Technologi- cal Progress: The Singularity Inthis book, I have been quite conservativeintermsof projectingwheretechnologymaytakeus.Ihavespokenof robotsthatmayeventuallymanagetostockstoreshelves and of other robots that might be remotely controlled fromlowwagecountries.Ihavenotspokenofarmiesof marauding, humanoid robots, orofintelligentcomputers taking control of nuclear weapons. Partly, the reason is thatIwanttocomeacrossasverydowntoearth.Iwant you to take this book seriously. A second reason is that none of thosescience fiction-like scenarios areatall ne- cessary. Technology—if we do not prepare for it—does not need to directly or physically attack us to cause us greatharm.Theonlythingitneedstodoistakeourjobs. Nonetheless,IwouldberemissifIdidn’tincludethe fact that many extremely well regarded individuals with deepexperienceinscienceandtechnologyhaveafarmore ambitious view of what is ultimately possible. World- renowned cosmologist and author of the book, A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking, has said, “Computers arelikelytoovertakehumansinintelligenceatsomepoint in the next hundred years.” 35 Inventor and author Ray Kurzweil,whoreceivedtheNationalMedalofTechnology Acceleration / 101 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon fromPresidentClintonin1999,isfarmoreoptimisticand predicts that machines will achieve true intelligence by 2029. Kurzweilisalsooneoftheleadingproponentsofthe technologicalsingularity,whichheexpectstooccurbytheyear 2045. 36 This concept, which was originally introduced by the mathematician and author Vernor Vinge, 37 suggests that at some point in the future, technological progress willsimplyexplodeincomprehensibly.Basically,thingswill justgetawayfromus.Ifyoulookatthenowfamiliarchart that follows, thetechnological singularity would occurat somepointclosetowherethelinebecomesnearlyvertical. Beyondthispoint,itisjuststraightup. The Technological Singularity Manypeoplehavepostulatedthatthesingularitywill bebroughtonwhenmachinesfinallybecomesmarterthan us, andthen applythathigher intelligence to thetask of Technology Time Singularity THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 102 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon designing even better versions of themselves. After that, humanbeingswouldnolongerbeabletounderstandthe progresstakingplace. It seems obvious that if the singularity does indeed takeplace,nearlyallofuscouldpotentiallybeoutofajob. People with PhDs from top universities could well find themselves in the same boat as autoworkers in Detroit. Howcouldtheaveragepeoplewhomakeupthebulkof ourpopulationearnalivinginaworldinwhichmachines weresmarterandmorecapablethaneventhemostintelli- genthumans? Aside from the issue of providing essential support forthepopulation,thesingularityintroducesamorebasic economicparadox.Inafree marketeconomy,nothingis producedunlessthereisdemand—and“demand”ineco- nomic terms means desire combined with the ability to pay.Thereisnoincentivetoproduceproductsifthereare noconsumerswithsufficientdiscretionaryincometopur- chase those products. This istrueevenif intelligent ma- chinessomedaybecomesuper-efficientproducers.Ifaver- age—or even exceptional—human beings are unable to find employment within their capabilities, then how will they acquire the income necessary to create the demand thatinturndrivesproduction?Ifweconsiderthesingular- ityinthiscontext,thenisitreallysomethingthatwillnec- essarilypushusforwardexponentially?Orcoulditinac- tualityleadtorapideconomicdecline? * * Thetechnologistswhospeculateaboutthesingularitydon’tseemtoo concerned about this problem. Perhaps they assume that the super- intelligentmachinesofthefuturewillfigureallthisoutforus.How- Acceleration / 103 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Inthisbook,wewon’tagainstrayintothismorespe- culativearena(exceptinthelastsectionsoftheAppendix). Theideaspresentedinthisbookdonotdependontheoc- currenceofthetechnologicalsingularity.Thestandardwe have set is much lower: we areconcerned only withthe possibilitythatmachineswillbecomecapableofperform- ingmostaverage,routinejobs.Thesingularityrepresentsa far more extreme case. It’s fair to say, however, that if something along the lines ofthetechnologicalsingularity istooccur,wemayfirstneedaparadigmshiftintheway oureconomyworks—oratleastsomechangesinoureco- nomic architecture. Otherwise, we will be in for quite a shock. A War on Technology Inthischapterwehaveseenthatcomputersareincreasing in both power and number at a simply astonishing rate. We’velookedatclearevidencethatshowswehaveessen- tiallyhittheceilingintermsofwhatwecanexpectfrom futureincreasesinthecapabilityofaveragehumanbeings. We’ve also looked at a variety of specific job types and technologiesandshownhowautomationislikelytohavea much broader impact than many of us might imagine— andalsohowthejobsofmanyhighlypaidandhighlyedu- ever, if something other than consumer demand drives production, then we no longer have a market economy; we will then have a plannedeconomy.TheSovietUnion,ofcourse,didn’thaveintelligent machines—but they did have lots ofvery intelligent mathematicians staffinganagencycalledGosplan,whichattemptedtofigurethingsout. Let’shopethemachineswilldoabetterjob.(Pleasesee“TheTech- nologyParadox”intheAppendixformoreonthis.) THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 104 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon cated workers may be among the most vulnerable. Let’s lookagainattheassumptionwesetouttotestatthebe- ginningofthischapter: Technologywillnotadvancetothepointwherethebulkofjobsper- formed by typical people will be automated before the year 2089. Priortothatyear,theeconomywillalwayscreatejobsthatarewithin thecapabilitiesofthevastmajorityofthehumanpopulation. Atthispoint,itseemsverydifficulttosupportthisas- sumption. Most of the trends we have reviewed in this chapter are likelyto come into play long before ourcutoff dateof2089.Itisverypossiblethatevenadvancednano- technologywouldbeavailablewithinthattimeframe.We therefore cannot escapethe conclusion that we will very likelyhavetodealwiththeimpactofacross-the-boardau- tomationinour lifetimes, orat theveryleast, within the lifetimesofourchildren. Ifwedonothaveastrategy—andspecificpolicies— in place to deal with this issue before its full impact ar- rives,theoutcomewillbedecidedlynegative.Asthetrend towardsystemicjoblossincreases,itisquiteeasytofore- see a number of possible ramifications. I have already mentionedthelikelihood ofadropincollegeenrollment and a migration toward safer trade jobs. Another trend thatwillsurelyoccurasrecognitionsetsinwillbeagener- al“warontechnology.”Workersinvirtuallyeveryoccupa- tion—evenmanyofthosewhothemselvesworkintech- nical fields—will desperately, and quite understandably, attempttoprotecttheirlivelihoods. Acceleration / 105 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Wecanexpectsubstantialpressureongovernmentto somehowrestricttechnologicalprogressandjobautoma- tion.Itispossiblethattherewillbeasignificant,last-ditch resurgence in the power of organized labor. Workers in jobs and industries that are not now organized will very possiblyturntounionsinanattempttoexertsomepower overtheirownfutures.Theresultislikelytobesomewhat slowedtechnicalprogress,workstoppages,andsignificant economicandsocialdisruptions. The economists who believe in the premise of the Ludditefallacyarenotwrongaboutonething:technologi- cal advancement is the only thing thatcan, over the long term,driveustowardcontinuingeconomicgrowth.Con- tinuingtechnicalprogressisouronlyhopeforawealthier societyinthefuture. We know that in the coming decades, we will face enormousnewchallenges.Mostnotablewillbetherelated issuesofincreasingenergyscarcityandclimatechange.We arelikelytofaceawide-rangingimpactonclimate,agricul- tureandevengeography—includingthepossibilityofris- ingoceanlevelsthatcouldresultinhumanitariandisasters ofunimaginableproportions.Asweareallaware,current- lytheeffortstomitigateglobalwarmingandtheotherim- portant environmental impacts from burning fossil fuels areenjoying verylimitedsuccess.Theunfortunatereality isthatwemayultimatelybeforcedtoacceptthefactthat wewillfail—atleasttosomedegree—inourquesttostop climate change. But the costs associated with somehow adapting to those changes will be astronomical. At the same time, reservesofoil,natural gas, and in the longer THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 106 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon runevencoal,aregoingtobedepleted.Howcanwehope toface thesechallengesifoureconomyisindecline and the bulk of our population is focused almost exclusively onthecontinuityofindividualincomes? Asimilarpointcanbemaderegardingtheglobalwar onpoverty.Howcanwehopetowinthiswar,ifweour- selvesarenotprosperous?Weknowthatpovertyisoneof the primary drivers of war, conflict and terrorism. In a long-term stagnant or declining economic environment, theseproblemswillonlygrow. Theanswercannotbetoattempttohalttechnological progress. The problem is not with technology; it is with our economic system, and it lies specifically in that sys- tem’sinabilitytocontinuethrivinginthenewrealitythatis being created. It will be extraordinarily difficult to make materialchangestothatsystembecauseithasservedusso well,forsolong.Nonetheless,inthefinalchaptersofthis book,IwillsuggestsomechangesthatIbelievewillallow us to move from fearing technology to leveraging it as neverbeforeandthendeployingitagainstthechallenges wewill face. Before then, however,we must move from ourtunnelsimulationback intotherealworld.Therewe willseethatthesituationisprobablyfarmoredangerous andperhapsmoreimmediatethanwehaveyetimagined. CopyrightedMaterial– Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon Chapter 3 DANGER In the first chapter of this book, our tunnel simulation showedthat,aslargenumbersofworkerswereautomated out of their jobs, theeconomy would eventuallygo into declinebecauseeachworkerisalsoaconsumer(andmay supportotherconsumers)inthemassmarket.Inthereal world, it seems very likely that the automation process wouldbea fairlygradualone.Can weassume,therefore, thattheeconomicimpactofthistransitionwouldalsobe gradual in nature and might not be apparent until some pointinthedistantfuture?Toanswerthisquestion,let’s lookathowmarketsworkintherealworld. The Predictive Nature of Markets Oneofthemoreinterestingdevelopmentstoariseoutof theInternethasbeentheappearanceofonlineprediction markets. A predictionmarket is really just another name forabettingmarket,anditoperatesinasimilarfashionto thefuturesmarketsthatallowtraderstoplacebetsonthe futuredirectionofthingslikeoilpricesandstockmarket indexes.Prediction markets, such as theIowa Electronic Markets(IEM) andIntrade,allowparticipantstobetreal THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 108 CopyrightedMaterial–Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon money on things like elections, economic developments (suchasrecessions),orspecificeventsin thebusinessor entertainmentworlds. While prediction markets are specifically set up to predict future events, we know that we can expand this ideaandsaythatallfreemarketsare,inessence,prediction markets.Ifyoubuyaparticularcompany’sstock,thenyou areplacingabetthat,inthefuture,thatstockwilltradeat ahighervalue.Collectively,themillionsofparticipantsin theworld’sstockmarketsoftenactasasortofpredictive barometer for the economy as a whole. Historically, the U.S.stockmarkethasoftenanticipatedrecessions bysix monthsorso.Likewise,recoveryfromarecessionisvery oftenprecededbyariseinthestockmarket. This predictive feature also applies to all the other various markets with which we interact, including the housingmarket,thejobmarket,andthemassmarketfor goods and services. The reason is quite obvious. People arerational beingsand every individual, to some degree, incorporateshisorherexpectationsforthefutureintohis orhercurrentactions.Ifyouexpectthatyouwillreceivea largesumofmoneyatsomepointinthenearfuture,you areverylikelytobeginspendingsomeofthatmoneyeven beforeyouactuallyreceiveit. Nowwecanbegintoseeapotentialproblem.Asau- tomationbeginstoeliminatejobsinanincreasinglywide rangeofindustriesandoccupations,itsimpactsareclearly notgoingtobekeptasecret.Peoplewillbecomeawareof what is happening—even ifit is notofficially recognized bygovernments—andtheywillbegintomodifytheircur- [...]... potential problem with the general value of assets As people work throughout their careers they save for retirement The majority of this goes into stocks and bonds, often via 401(k) plans When these people then reach retirement age, they begin to sell those assets in order to maintain their standard of living The problem is that, for the first time, we will have a very large number of older people actively... on simple, and inescapable, demographic analysis and, in particular, on counting workers What will be most important in the future? The conventional answer is: first, the number of workers as compared with the number of retired persons in most countries, and second the number of workers (and the wages they are willing to accept) in developing nations like China as compared with the number of workers... in job creation Offshoring and Factory Migration In Chapter 2 we saw that offshoring is often really just the leading edge of automation When a job is offshored, a new consumer is created in a developing nation—at least temporarily However, from the point of view of consumers in the United States or Western Europe, offshoring looks exactly the same as automation The same can be said of relocating a... that technology will be put back into its box It will behave Technology s role will be to continue pushing the existing trends forward so that the projection lines all the analysts have drawn will remain nice and straight Friedman’s book, The World is Flat, offers a longer list of ten forces that have “flattened” the world, and he does include some facets of technology in that list.39 However, the focus... that is resulting from the 2008-9 recession As of early 2009, thousands of Chinese factories have shut down and millions of workers have lost their jobs The Xinhua news tuting low cost labor for automation BYD, a manufacturer of batteries and automobiles is one example The question is whether that business model is sustainable I would argue that, especially in the automotive market, the company will ultimately... question the overall wisdom of this practice This is true even for the developing nations that are currently benefiting from offshoring because, as we will see later, the consequences of such a severe and long lasting economic downturn in the West would almost certainly wipe out and reverse any temporary gains these countries may have obtained from offshoring Of course, the overall wisdom of a practice... manufacturing in poor countries will also remain unchanged The dynamics of these sectors are very different—poor farmers are subject to many factors which keep mechanization at bay, including lack of education and access to capital, small plots with poor economyof scale, trade barriers, and often outright exploitation at the hands of governments and corrupt officials Manufacturing in China is very different... workers in the U.S it looks exactly the same as simply building a fully automated factory In other words, service offshoring and factory relocations accelerate the job loss as well as the psychological impact on workers (consumers) and make it likely that the dangerous scenario described above could occur even earlier in the developed nations And it is these developed economies that remain the primary... the future To do this, analysts Copyrighted Material – Paperback/Kindle available @ Amazon THE LIGHTS IN THE TUNNEL / 118 take a per-capita income that is somewhat comparable to that of developed nations and then multiply it by some huge fraction ofthe Chinese population In other words, they assume that a very significant percentage ofthe 1.3 billion people in China are going to be dragged into the. .. in the Western countries and fear of structural unemployment there grows, consumer demand will fall The reality is that China does not have an integrated, self-sustaining economy A substantial fraction of its factories are geared toward exports, and these exports are largely responsible for the phenomenal economic growth that China has enjoyed in recent years Evidence of this is clearly seen in the . be mostimportantin the future? The conventionalansweris: first, the number of workersascomparedwith the number of retiredpersonsinmostcountries, and second the num- ber of workers (and the wagestheyarewillingtoaccept)in developingnationslikeChinaascomparedwith the num- ber of workersinadvancedcountries. Two of the mostnotablebooksthathavefleshedout these. some pointin the distant future? Toanswerthisquestion,let’s lookathowmarketsworkin the realworld. The Predictive Nature of Markets One of the moreinterestingdevelopmentstoariseout of the Internethasbeen the appearance of onlineprediction markets.. Ameri- canmanufacturerstocompeteagainstlowcostproducers inChina,hasforcedjobcuts and accelerated the driveto- wardautomation.Thishasbeenreflectedin the substantial productivityincreases of the U.S. economy inrecentyears. While the impact of globalizationon the job markethas received most of the attention,