Effects of several cultivation techniques on growth, development and quality of thanh ngoc orchid

VIET NAM VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE FACULTY OF AGRONOMY UNDERGRADUATE THESIS TOPIC: EFFECTS OF SEVERAL CULTIVATION TECHNIQUES ON GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND QUALITY OF THANH NGOC ORCHID (CYMBIDIUM SINENSE) Name : DANG THI PHUONG ANH Student code : 611573 Class : K61KHCTT Instructor : ASSOC.PROF NGUYEN VIET LONG Department : FOOD CROP SCIENCE HANOI – 2021 COMMITMENT I hereby declare that this is my own research, the data and research results in this report are truthful and have not been used to defend a degree I hereby certify that all assistance in the implementation of this graduate research project has been thanked and the information cited has been indicated by the origin, name of the author, time of publication Ha Noi, February 25th, 2021 Student Đặng Thị Phương Anh i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page is where I would like to thank all those who helped me with my project thesis: “Effects of several cultivation techniques on growth, development and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid (Cymbidium sinense)” Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Associate Professor Nguyen Viet Long, for the continuous support of my study, research and experimental, for his patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my undergraduate thesis study Besides my advisor, I would like to thank Associate Professor Dang Van Dong, Fruit and Vegetable Research Institute for helping me a lot during the experiment time! Also, I thank my friends, who helped me over the time, and I undoubtedly could not have done this without them Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family: my parents for giving birth to me at the first place and supporting me Hanoi, February 25th , 2021 Student Đặng Thị Phương Anh ii CONTENT COMMITMENT i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURE vi LIST OF PICTURES vii UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUMARY viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Rationale 1.2 Objective CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 An overview of Thanh Ngoc orchid (Cymbidium sinense) 2.1.1 Origin and classification of orchid 2.1.2 Morphological characteristics and ecological conditions of Thanh Ngoc orchid (Cymbidium sinense) 2.2 The scientific basis for orchid flowering 2.3 Production situation of orchids in the world and in Vietnam 10 2.3.1 Production situation of orchids in general and Thanh Ngoc in particular in the world 10 2.3 Production and consumption of orchids in the country 13 2.4 Research situation Thanh Ngoc orchid (Cymbidium sinense) 17 2.4.1 Research in the world 17 2.4.2 Research in Vietnam 18 CHAPTER 3: MATERIAL AND METHOD 21 3.1 Material and research object 21 3.2 Research place and time 21 3.3 Research content 22 3.4 Research method 22 iii 3.5 Data collection 27 3.6 Data analysis 28 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 29 4.1 Effect of substrate on yield and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid 29 4.2 Research to determine the appropriate fertilizer for Thanh Ngoc orchid at the mature stage 33 4.3 Effects of irrigation water on the growth and development of Thanh Ngoc orchid 40 4.4 Effect of shading mode on yield and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid 42 4.5 Influence of treatment time on flowering rate and flower quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid 49 CHAPTER CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION 52 5.1 Conclusion 52 5.2 Recommendation 52 PART 6: REFERENCES 53 APPENDIX 58 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Global value for cut flowers (period 2014-2019) 10 Table 2.2 Average annual prices at the Dutch flower auction (2014-2018) (Euro cent/branch) 12 Table 4.1 Influence of the substrate on the new branch height growth dynamics of Thanh Ngoc orchid 30 Table 4.2 Influence of the substrate on growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid 32 Table 4.3 Effects of fertilizer on Thanh Ngoc height growth dynamics 35 Table 4.4 Effects of some fertilizers on growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid 36 Table 4.5 Effects of fertilizer on disease effection on Thanh Ngoc orchid 38 Table 4.6 Effects of irrigation water on some growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid 40 Table 4.7 Effect of shading regime on some growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid 43 Table 4.8 Influence of shade regime on flowering rate and flower quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid in Gia Lam – Hanoi 46 Table 4.9 The effects of shading on the disease situation on Thanh Ngoc orchid 48 Table 4.10 Influence of the time taken to process on the time of Thanh Ngoc's orchid appearance 49 Table 4.11 Influence of the treatment time on flowering rate and flower quality Thanh Ngoc 50 v LIST OF FIGURE Figure 4.1 Influence of the substrate on the new branch height growth dynamics of Thanh Ngoc orchid 29 Figure 4.2 Effects of fertilizer on Thanh Ngoc height growth dynamics 35 Figure 4.3 Effects of irrigation water on some growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid 41 vi LIST OF PICTURES Picture 4.1 Some substrate used in the experiment 31 Picture 4.2 Some fertilizer used in experiment 34 Picture 4.3 Effects of some fertilizers on the number of new branches/ pot 37 Picture 4.4 Anthracnose in Thanh Ngoc orchid 39 Picture 4.5 Measure the stem diameter 41 Picture 4.6 Measure the psedubulb diameter 41 Picture 4.7 Sunshade net systems 43 Picture 4.8 Difference color of leaves in CT2, CT3, CT4, CT5 45 Picture 4.9 The flowering rate in CT4 46 Picture 4.10 The flowering rate in CT1 47 Picture 4.11 Thanh Ngoc orchid’s flower 51 vii UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUMARY The thesis is done in order to identify effects of cultivation techniques on yield and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid as well as contribute to supplement and build the production process of this plant The research includes main experiments done in -year -old plant to access the effect of substrate, fertilizer, irrigation water, lighting regime, and time of treatment on growth, development and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid Most of them are designed in RBD type, 15 pots/ formula Recorded data (for example, the number of new branches, leaves length, leaves width, spike length, the number of flower/ spike,…) are analyzed by Excel 2010, and Irristat application These separate factors such as (i) The substrate containing 1/3 pine bark + 1/3 peanut shell + 1/3 pebble stone, (ii) Plant- Soul fertilizer (20-20-20) + TE ; (iii) Rainwater or well water with medium EC value; (iv) Black nets to reduce 70% of direct light; (v) Treatment of flowering in Moc Chau/ greenhouse for 5.5 months before Tet, are good for growth, development and quality of Thanh Ngoc orchid viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Rationale For Vietnamese people, Thanh Ngoc orchid is a beautiful flower, easy to care for, and does not require high technology to multiply or produce like some other orchids Growing orchids is not only a hobby to help people get in tune with nature, but also a profession that brings a high source of economic income Thanks to favorable natural conditions, Vietnam is an ideal place to develop orchids, especially indigenous orchids Currently, in Vietnam, there are many kinds of precious orchids such as Thanh Ngoc, Hoang Vu, Cam To, Thanh Truong (Thai Ha et al., 2017), etc Thanh Ngoc orchid is loved by many people, is more appreciated than other orchid species because its long drooping leaves create a soft, harmonious balance, the flowers are green and have a mild fragrance Cymbidium is a genus in the orchid family, the genus orchid has species that stick on trees and is called Epiphytic cymbidium and there are species growing on the soil, called the terrestrial orchid (Zhang et al., 2018) (Terrestrial cymbidium) Enjoying and playing orchids, especially Cymbidium, has been around for a long time in Vietnam The people of Hanoi and the provinces of Bac Ninh, Nam Dinh, Ha Tay (now Hanoi), Hung Yen, Thai Binh, have also preserved many precious species of Cymbidium such as Thanh Ngoc, Hoang Vu, Cam To, Thanh Truong, the value of each orchid pot is from a few million to several tens of million dong when spring comes, thus bringing enormous economic benefits With outstanding features, from 2015-2019, Thanh Ngoc orchid has been collected, tested, and selected by the Fruit and Vegetable Research Institute in the Northern provinces including Hanoi Although this flower is evaluated as healthy and suitable to the tastes of consumers, research on technical measures to care for orchids is limited (Hanh et al., 2016), so the plant has poor growth and productivity such as low quality of flowers, especially there is no way to 2.00 2.04 2.08 2.12 2.16 2.20 THE FOLLOWING RECORDS HAVE LARGE RESIDUALS (>2.5 SES) CT$ REP CT3 OBS VALUE FITTED VALUE 2.500 RESIDUAL 2.173 0.3267 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -1.718 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I MEDIAN= 2.715 + I 0.5066E-06 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCAONHAN FILE B4 0.354 27/ 2/21 21:17 :PAGE VARIATE V007 CCAONHAN LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 4078.31 1359.44 244.82 0.000 REP 2.81034 1.40517 0.25 0.781 54 299.846 5.55271 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 4380.97 74.2537 CT$ REP 17.419 0.49 0.811 REPS 9.7923 0.42 0.794 CT$ REPS 12 75.018 1.17 0.336 REP REPS 91.770 2.54 0.022 24 105.85 0.68 0.830 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 7.59485 F(1 53)= 1.38 P= 0.244 REGRESSION SLOPE= 0.99702E-01 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -11.439 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.1847 P-VALUE= 0.574 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES 3.5 1.0 -1.5 -4.0 : : : : : : : : -:* : : * : :** * : : *** : :** *** : -: * * * * : : * ** * : : * * : : * * 2* : : * * : -:* * * : :* : : * ** ** : : * * : : * : -: ** : : : : : : : : : 48 52 56 60 64 68 81 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -1.891 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I + I MEDIAN= -0.2311E-01 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE B4 0.491 27/ 2/21 21:17 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT$ CT$ NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA CT1 15 6.00000 68.4800 2.12667 2.21333 CT2 15 5.53333 57.8467 2.08000 2.18000 CT3 15 5.73333 62.3733 2.06000 2.18000 CT4 15 3.00000 53.3467 2.06000 2.03333 SE(N= 15) 0.848626E-01 0.344888 0.314466E-01 0.327417E-01 5%LSD 54DF 0.240594 0.891543E-01 0.928259E-01 CT$ NOS CCAONHAN CT1 15 69.2267 CT2 15 64.3133 CT3 15 67.5533 CT4 15 48.4333 SE(N= 15) 5%LSD 54DF 0.977792 0.608425 1.72495 MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA 20 5.15000 60.8150 2.07000 2.14000 20 5.15000 60.1600 2.11000 2.17000 20 4.90000 60.5600 2.06500 2.14500 SE(N= 20) 0.734932E-01 0.298682 0.272336E-01 0.283551E-01 5%LSD 54DF 0.208361 0.772099E-01 0.803896E-01 REP NOS CCAONHAN 20 20 62.1200 20 62.6500 SE(N= 20) 5%LSD 54DF 0.846792 62.3750 0.526911 1.49385 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE B4 27/ 2/21 21:17 :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT$ 82 |REP | (N= 60) NO OBS SONHANH 60 5.0667 SD/MEAN | % | | | | | | | BASED ON BASED ON TOTAL SS RESID SS 1.2604 0.32867 6.5 0.0000 0.0266 | DAILA 60 60.512 5.7955 1.3357 2.2 0.0000 0.3027 RONGLA 60 2.0817 0.12142 0.12179 5.9 0.4012 0.4491 DKCUGIA 60 2.1517 0.14081 0.12681 5.9 0.0014 0.7310 CCAONHAN 60 62.382 8.6171 2.3564 3.8 0.0000 0.7805 Effect of irrigation water on the growth and development characteristic of Thanh Ngoc orchid BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONHANH FILE B5 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE VARIATE V003 SONHANH LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 29.2500 9.75000 36.56 0.000 REP 533334 266667 1.00 0.376 54 14.4000 266667 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 44.1833 748870 CT$ REP 0.80000 0.47 0.828 REPS 0.43333 0.39 0.818 CT$ REPS 12 3.1667 0.99 0.477 REP REPS 3.4667 1.82 0.096 24 6.5333 1.04 0.456 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.428495E-14 F(1 53)= 0.00 P= 0.996 REGRESSION SLOPE=-0.64188E-07 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= 1.0000 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.5992E-02 P-VALUE= 0.930 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : * : : : : : : * : 0.8 -: * : : : : * : : : : : 0.0 -: : : : : : : : : : -0.8 -: * : : * : : : : : : : -1.6 -: : : : : : : : : : 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 THE FOLLOWING RECORDS HAVE LARGE RESIDUALS (>2.5 SES) 83 CT$ REP CT4 OBS VALUE FITTED VALUE 7.000 RESIDUAL 5.600 1.400 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.041 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT -I MEDIAN= 2.858 + I - 0.3226E-06 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAILA FILE B5 0.786 * 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE VARIATE V004 DAILA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 858.958 286.319 155.83 0.000 REP 281333 140666 0.08 0.926 54 99.2201 1.83741 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 958.459 16.2451 CT$ REP 5.3080 0.45 0.841 REPS 7.9743 1.09 0.371 CT$ REPS 12 35.480 1.95 0.055 REP REPS 2.2987 0.14 0.997 24 48.159 1.18 0.331 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.165563 F(1 53)= REGRESSION SLOPE= 0.10137 0.09 P= 0.765 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -11.164 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.2969 P-VALUE= 0.109 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES 1.5 0.0 -1.5 -3.0 : : : : : : : ** 2 : -: * * * : : *2 : : * * : : * : : * * : -: ** : : 2 : : * * : : * : : * : -: * * * : : * : : * : : * : : : -: * : : : : : : : : : 54 56 58 60 62 64 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.330 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT + I - 84 MEDIAN= -0.2074E-01 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE RONGLA FILE B5 1.025 ** 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE VARIATE V005 RONGLA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 697834 REP 533333E-02 266666E-02 * RESIDUAL 232611 54 598667 20.98 0.000 0.24 0.790 110864E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 1.30183 220650E-01 CT$ REP 0.74667E-01 REPS 0.37667E-01 0.84 0.509 12 0.11967 0.87 0.579 0.10133 1.17 0.336 24 0.26533 1.00 0.499 CT$ REPS REP REPS CT$ REP REPS 1.14 0.354 TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.181899E-01 F(1 53)= 1.66 P= 0.200 REGRESSION SLOPE= SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -34.590 8.5622 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = 0.1963E-02 P-VALUE= 0.887 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : * : : * * : : : 0.12 -: : : * :2 : * : : : : : 0.00 -: :3 : : : : : : * -0.12 -: : * : : : * : : * : : * : * : * -0.24 -: * : : : : : 1.92 : 1.98 : : : : 2.04 2.10 2.16 2.22 85 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.403 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT -I + I MEDIAN= -0.2980E-06 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKCUGIA FILE B5 0.900 * 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE VARIATE V006 DKCUGIA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 829833 REP 563334E-01 281667E-01 * RESIDUAL 276611 54 535667 27.88 0.000 2.84 0.066 991976E-02 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 1.42183 240989E-01 CT$ REP 0.83667E-01 1.48 0.204 REPS 0.42667E-01 1.08 0.376 CT$ REPS 12 0.89333E-01 0.70 0.742 REP REPS 0.95333E-01 1.24 0.295 0.22467 0.90 0.597 CT$ REP REPS 24 TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.186711E-02 F(1 53)= 0.19 P= 0.672 REGRESSION SLOPE= 0.77402 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -2.1915 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.1304E-01 P-VALUE= 0.342 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : * : : : : : 0.15 -: : * : : : : : : * 0.00 -: * : : : : : * : : : : * : -0.15 -: * : * : : : : * : : : : : -0.30 -: : : : : 1.84 : 1.92 : 2.00 : : : 2.08 2.16 2.24 86 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.311 TO ULPT= 2.417 NO.UPLT I + I - MEDIAN= -0.5292E-01 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCAONHAN FILE B5 0.530 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE VARIATE V007 CCAONHAN LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 685.105 228.368 31.06 0.000 REP 6.01300 3.00650 0.41 0.672 54 397.071 7.35317 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 59 1088.19 18.4439 CT$ REP 15.643 0.33 0.919 REPS 41.408 1.46 0.229 CT$ REPS 12 107.72 1.30 0.253 REP REPS 94.175 1.79 0.104 24 138.12 0.67 0.844 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 4.17042 F(1 53)= REGRESSION SLOPE= 0.12323 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = 0.56 P= 0.463 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -15.450 0.2390 P-VALUE= 0.527 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : : : : : * * * -: : *: : * * * : * * * * : * *: : * : -: * : * : * * * : * * * * * : * -3 -: * *: * : * : * * : : *: * : : *: * * : : * : : * : * * : : -6 -: : : : : : : : : : 60 62 64 66 68 70 87 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.203 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I MEDIAN= 1.693 + I 0.1114E+00 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE B5 0.439 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT$ CT$ NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA CT1 15 3.93333 55.1533 1.93333 CT2 15 4.53333 57.6133 2.02000 1.88667 2.02667 CT3 15 5.33333 62.6067 2.15333 2.14000 CT4 15 5.73333 64.6133 2.20667 2.19333 SE(N= 15) 0.133333 0.349991 0.271863E-01 0.257161E-01 5%LSD 54DF 0.378013 0.992260 0.770759E-01 0.729077E-01 CT$ NOS CCAONHAN CT1 15 CT2 15 65.6400 CT3 15 67.7533 CT4 15 71.4533 SE(N= 15) 5%LSD 54DF 62.1333 0.700151 1.98500 MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA 20 4.75000 60.0500 2.08500 2.10500 20 4.95000 60.0400 2.06500 2.04000 20 4.95000 59.9000 2.08500 2.04000 SE(N= 20) 0.115470 0.303101 0.235440E-01 0.222708E-01 5%LSD 54DF 0.327369 0.859323 0.667496E-01 0.631399E-01 REP NOS CCAONHAN 20 67.1250 20 66.7600 20 66.3500 SE(N= 20) 5%LSD 54DF 0.606348 1.71906 - 88 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE B5 27/ 2/21 21:25 :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD (N= SD/MEAN | 60) NO OBS SONHANH 60 4.8833 DEVIATION BASED ON BASED ON TOTAL SS RESID SS 0.86537 0.51640 C OF V |CT$ % |REP | | | | | | 5.1 0.0000 | 0.3763 DAILA 60 59.997 4.0305 1.3555 2.3 0.0000 0.9259 RONGLA 60 2.0783 0.14854 0.10529 5.1 0.0000 0.7899 DKCUGIA 60 2.0617 0.15524 0.99598E-01 4.8 0.0000 0.0657 CCAONHAN 60 66.745 4.2946 4.1 0.0000 0.6718 2.7117 | | Effect of shading regime on the growth, development characteristics of Thanh Ngoc orchid BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONHANH FILE B7 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE VARIATE V003 SONHANH LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 185.947 REP 799998E-01 399999E-01 * RESIDUAL 68 14.8533 46.4867 212.82 0.000 0.18 0.835 218430 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 74 200.880 2.71459 CT$ REP 1.2533 0.69 0.699 REPS 1.0133 1.17 0.332 CT$ REPS 16 3.9200 1.17 0.326 REP REPS 1.7867 1.03 0.427 32 6.8800 0.97 0.532 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.184803 F(1 67)= REGRESSION SLOPE= 0.48260 0.84 P= 0.365 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -3.8646 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.1080E-01 P-VALUE= 0.844 89 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : * : : : 2* : * : 0.5 -: : : : : 33 33: : : : : 0.0 -: : : : : : : 57 : 34 : : -0.5 -: : : * : : 22 22: : : : : -1.0 -: : : : : : : : : : 2.0 2.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 6.0 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -1.648 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I + I MEDIAN= -0.3595E+00 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAILA FILE B7 2.269 ** 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE VARIATE V004 DAILA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 1544.88 386.220 87.38 0.000 REP 6.18428 3.09214 0.70 0.505 68 300.564 4.42006 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 74 1851.63 25.0220 CT$ REP 29.620 0.82 0.589 REPS 12.791 0.71 0.590 CT$ REPS 16 44.863 0.57 0.892 REP REPS 17.870 0.47 0.870 32 195.42 2.09 0.017 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 2.14133 F(1 67)= 0.48 P= 0.497 REGRESSION SLOPE=-0.64826E-01 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.2516E-01 P-VALUE= 0.919 90 9.1290 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : : : : : : 4.0 -: : : : : * * : * : * 1.5 -: 2 : * : * : * : : * * ** * : * * * * * : * ** : * : * * * : 2 * * * * * : : * * * : ** : * -3.5 -: * : : * * : : * -1.0 -: : : * * : * : : : : : 55.0 57.5 : : 60.0 : 62.5 : 65.0 67.5 THE FOLLOWING RECORDS HAVE LARGE RESIDUALS (>2.5 SES) CT$ REP OBS VALUE FITTED VALUE RESIDUAL CT2 64.60 58.91 5.695 CT2 64.40 59.11 5.295 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -1.820 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT + I MEDIAN= -0.3930E-01 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 2.845 RONGLA FILE B7 1.108 ** 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE VARIATE V005 RONGLA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 1.27600 319000 8.76 0.000 REP 113867 569334E-01 1.56 0.215 68 2.47680 364235E-01 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 74 3.86667 522523E-01 CT$ REP 0.36080 1.28 0.271 REPS 0.12267 0.83 0.511 CT$ REPS 16 0.71467 1.32 0.222 REP REPS 0.24213 0.81 0.595 32 1.0365 0.81 0.726 CT$ REP REPS 91 TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.857759E-01 F(1 67)= 2.40 P= 0.122 REGRESSION SLOPE= SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= -13.417 3.3271 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.9052E-02 P-VALUE= 0.699 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : * : * : 0.2 -: * * :2 2 : * :* : * * * * * * * * : : * * : : * * -0.2 -: : * * :* : * :* : * : 2 0.0 -: : : * : : * * * * * : : : : : * : : *2 : : : : * -0.4 -: * : * : : : : 1.92 : 2.00 : : 2.08 : 2.16 : 2.24 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.230 2.32 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I MEDIAN= 1.937 + I - 0.1467E+00 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKCUGIA FILE B7 0.362 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE VARIATE V006 DKCUGIA LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 568800 REP 802667E-01 401333E-01 * RESIDUAL 68 2.03840 142200 4.74 0.002 1.34 0.268 299765E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 74 2.68747 363171E-01 CT$ REP 0.28640 REPS 0.35467E-01 0.28 0.888 16 0.22320 0.40 0.976 0.24373 1.02 0.432 32 1.2496 1.78 0.047 CT$ REPS REP REPS CT$ REP REPS 92 1.23 0.299 TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 0.131899E-01 F(1 67)= 0.44 P= 0.518 REGRESSION SLOPE= -2.3274 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= 11.470 MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = -0.1968E-02 P-VALUE= 0.923 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -1.957 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT I + I - MEDIAN= -0.1132E+00 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCAONHAN FILE B7 0.262 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE VARIATE V007 CCAONHAN LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT$ 1309.02 327.255 66.30 0.000 REP 8.92879 4.46440 0.90 0.412 68 335.650 4.93603 * RESIDUAL * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 74 1653.60 22.3459 CT$ REP 49.878 1.31 0.256 REPS 10.703 0.53 0.719 CT$ REPS 16 88.796 1.17 0.323 REP REPS 16.497 0.39 0.923 32 169.78 1.15 0.339 CT$ REP REPS TUKEY'S TEST FOR TRANSFORMABLE NON-ADDITIVITY SS= 6.02324 F(1 67)= 1.22 P= 0.272 REGRESSION SLOPE=-0.98298E-01 SUGGESTED POWER TRANSFORMATION= MEAN ORTHOGONAL RESIDUAL = 0.1710 P-VALUE= 0.535 93 14.628 PLOT OF LS RESIDUALS AGAINST FITTED VALUES : : : : : **: : * 2.5 -: : : * * ** *2 * ** ** : * *: ** * * : : : * 0.0 -: : * : ** * : * ** * : : * * * : * * * : * : : ** *: *: * : : * -2.5 -: : * * : : *2 * : : * * : : *: -5.0 -: : : : : 60.0 : 62.5 : 65.0 : : 67.5 : 70.0 72.5 BOX PLOT OF STUDENTIZED RESIDUALS FROM LPLT= -2.072 TO ULPT= NO.UPLT -I MEDIAN= 1.593 + 0.3782E-01 ANDERSON-DARLING STATISTIC= TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE B7 I - 1.294 ** 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT$ CT$ NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA CT1 15 2.33333 55.9200 1.96000 2.19333 CT2 15 4.26667 59.2000 2.10000 2.13333 CT3 15 6.20000 64.3533 2.16667 2.36000 CT4 15 6.66667 68.5733 2.28667 2.34000 CT5 15 5.73333 65.4467 2.32000 2.22000 SE(N= 15) 0.120673 0.542835 5%LSD 68DF 0.340511 1.53175 CT$ NOS 15 62.3400 CT2 15 67.1600 CT3 15 71.2333 CT4 15 74.3667 CT5 15 71.5000 15) 5%LSD 68DF 0.139048 0.126144 CCAONHAN CT1 SE(N= 0.492771E-01 0.447038E-01 0.573645 1.61869 - 94 MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS SONHANH DAILA RONGLA DKCUGIA 25 5.00000 62.4040 2.15200 2.28800 25 5.04000 62.6040 2.12800 2.25200 25 5.08000 63.0880 2.22000 2.20800 SE(N= 25) 0.934731E-01 0.420479 0.381699E-01 0.346274E-01 5%LSD 68DF 0.263759 0.107706 REP NOS 25 69.4840 25 68.8400 25 69.6360 25) 5%LSD 68DF 0.977104E-01 CCAONHAN SE(N= 1.18649 0.444343 1.25383 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE B7 27/ 2/21 21:38 :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD (N= SD/MEAN | 75) NO OBS SONHANH 75 5.0400 DEVIATION C OF V |CT$ % |REP | | | | | | BASED ON BASED ON TOTAL SS RESID SS 1.6476 0.46737 6.3 0.0000 0.8346 DAILA 75 62.699 5.0022 2.1024 3.4 0.0000 0.5048 RONGLA 75 2.1667 0.22859 0.19085 6.8 0.0000 0.2153 DKCUGIA 75 2.2493 0.19057 0.17314 5.7 0.0021 0.2683 CCAONHAN 75 69.320 4.7271 2.2217 3.2 0.0000 0.4121 95 | | |