Xá cđ nh mit ng quan gi as methyl hóa gen p16INK4 vƠ b nh ungth

Một phần của tài liệu Khảo sát tình trạng Methyl hóa gen p16INK4α tại các đảo CpG thuộc vùng Promoter trên một số bệnh ung thư (Trang 69)

Ghi chú: m u mô vú c a các b nh nhơn tu i nh h n 40, t 40 - 50 vƠ cao h n tu i 50 l n l t lƠ N1, N2, N3. M u môvú trong giai đo n I, II, III vƠ IV.

3.3.5. Xác đnh m i t ng quan gi a s methyl hóa gen p16INK4vƠ b nh ung th th

K t qu ghi nh n trên m u b nh ung th vú vƠ m u mô lƠnh tính đ c x lỦ th ng kê, nh m tính toán m i t ng quan gi a t l methyl hóa t i vùng promoter gen p16INK4v i b nhung th vú.

M t cách t ng quát, tính toán đ u tiên v i hai phơn nhómμ nhóm m u b nh (ung th ) vƠ nhóm m u lƠnh (v i ung th nh ng m c b nh khác v vú).

Nhóm m u b nh lƠ sinh thi t mô đ c thu nh n t b nh vi n H Y D c Tp. HCM. M t s ch tiêu đánh giá tính ch t c a b nh (ung th vú) d a trên đ c đi m b nh h c bao g mμ giai đo n b nh (t giai đo n I đ n giai đo n IV).

Nhóm m u lƠnh (v i ung th ) nh ng m c các b nh lỦ khác v vú (kèm theo ch đ nh ph u thu t l y sinh thi t mô vú c a các bác s .

K t qu th ng kê cho th y tính ch t methyl hóa t i các v trí CpG vùng promoter gen p16INK4đ c kh o sát trong nghiên c u nƠy lƠ m t đ c tr ng c a b nh ung th vú, (đ c trình bƠy B ng 3.14, B ng ph l c 1).

B ng 3.14. M i t ng quan gi a t l methyl hóa t i vùng promoter gen p16INK4v i ung th vú

Lo i m u p16

INK4 Giá tr p*

Không methyl Methyl T ng M u lƠnh 2 (66,67%) 1 (33,33%) 3 (30%) M u ung th

vú 3 (42,86%) 4 (57,14%) 7 (70%)

4 (40,0%) 6 (60%) 10 (100%) p = 0,6726 p* > 0,05,  Th ng kê b ng ph n m m Medcal(B , 2014)

Phơn tích chi ti t h n đ i v i các ch tiêu c n lơm sƠng (tu i) vƠ lơm sƠng (các đ c đi m mô b nh) nh m xác đ nh m i t ng quan gi a tính ch t methyl hóa v i ung th vú, ti n hƠnh ghi nh n các k t qu sau (B ng 3.14, B ng ph l c 2).

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 59

B ng 3.15. M i t ng quan gi a t l methyl hóa t i vùng promoter gen p16INK4v i các y u t lơm sƠng trên b nh nhơn ung th vú

Nhóm tu i

M u b nh

Methyl p16INK4 Không methyl p16INK4 N1 (<40) 3 (50,0%) 1 (25,0%) N2 (40 - 50) 2 (33,3%) 1 (25,0%) N3 (>50) 1 (16,7%) 2 (50,0%) Giá tr p* 0,5241 Giai đo n b nh I 2 (50%) 0 (0%) II 2 (50%) 1 (33,3%) III 0 (0%) 1 (33,3%) IV 0 (0%) 1 (33,3%) Giá tr p* 0,2330 p* > 0,05,  Th ng kê b ng ph n m m Medcal(B , 2014)

Ghi chúμ m u mô vú c a các b nh nhơn tu i nh h n 40, t 40 - 50 vƠ cao h n tu i 50 l n l t lƠ N1, N2, N3. M u mô vú trong giai đo n I, II, III, IV.

i v i y u t ắnhóm tu i” c a các b nh nhơn đ c nghiên c uμ Nhóm b nh nhơn N1 (có đ tu i < 40) chi m t l ph n tr m cao nh t trong các nhóm tu i kho ng 50,0% , đi u nƠy ch ng t nguy c ung th vú tr c giai đo n ti n mƣn kinh. Phơn tích th ng kê, cho th y y u t nhóm tu i vƠ m c đ methyl hóa gen p16INK4 không có s khác bi t có Ủ ngh a khi giá tr p - value b ng 0,5241 cao h n 0,05 (đ c trình bƠy B ng 3.14, B ng ph l c 2).

i v i y u t ắgiai đo n” ung th μ s li u đ c trình bƠi B ng 3.14, B ng ph l c 3, nh n th y trong các giai đo n ung th vú, m c đ methyl hóa trong giai đo n I, II có ph n tr m cao nh t chi m kho ng > 50,0% hay nói cách khác methyl hóa đ c bi u hi n s m trong quá trình sinh u vƠ quá trình b nh hóa c a ung th vú. Tuy nhiên, giá tr p - value đ t 0,2330 cao h n 0,05 nên th ng kê không có Ủ ngh a.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 60

3.3.5. Kh o sát m c đ liên quan (t su t chênh - Odd ratio - OR vƠ nguy c t ngđ i - relative risk - RR) gi a tính ch t methyl hóa v i ung th

T su t chênh (Odd ratio) vƠ y u t nguy c t ng đ i (ralative Risk) dùng đ đánh giá hay đo l ng m c đ m nh y u c a m i liên quan m c đ methyl hóa v i lo i m u ung th vú (m u lƠnh vƠ m u ung th ).

K t qu th ng kê cho th y, t su t chênh (OR = 2,6667) vƠ y u t nguy c (RR = 2,0000) có giá tr p - value l n l t lƠ 0,4968; 0,5087 v i p > 0,05 không có s khác bi t trong th ng kê. Nguyên nhơn lƠ s m u nghiên c u còn h n h p, n u t ng s l ng m uung th vú có kh n ng th hi n đ c s t ng quan v m c đ methyl hóa v i các lo i m u (m u lƠnh vƠ m u ung th ).

B ng 3.16. M c đ liên quan gi a tính ch t methyl hóa t i vùng promoter gen p16INK4v i ung th vú

Lo i m u p16

INK4 Giá tr p*

Không methyl Methyl T ng

M u lƠnh 2 (66,67%) 1 (33,33%) 3 (30%) M u ung th vú 3 (42,86%) 4 (57,17%) 7 (70%) 4 (40,0%) 6 (60%) 10 (100%) p* = 0,6726 T su t chênh (OR) 2,6667 0,4968 T s nguy c (RR) 2,0000 0,5087 p* > 0,05,  Th ng kê b ng ph n m m Medcal (B, 2014)

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 61

4.1. K T LU N

Thu th p thông tin, xác đ nh v trí vƠ mô t c u trúc vùng promoter, các đ o CpG vƠ exon 1 thu c gen p16INK4a.

Th ng kê t n s methyl hóa gen p16INK4 trên các m u ung th vú, ung th c t cung, ung th ph i, ung th đ i tr c trƠng l n l t lƠ 52,5%, 68,28%, 3λ,6λ%, 83,02% trong t ng s 24 công trình nghiên c u đ c công b trên th gi i.

Kh o sát vƠ đánh giá t n s methyl hóa gen p16INK4 trên 10 m u mô vú đ c đúc paraffin Vi t Nam. T n s methyl hóa các t bƠo ung th , m u lƠnh l n l t lƠ 57,14%, 33,33% đ ng th i xác đ nh m i t ng gi a t l methyl hóa t i vùng promoter gen p16INK4v i các y u t lơm sƠng trên b nh nhơn ung th vú trong đ tu i nh h n 40 (50%) hay giai đo n I (50%) vƠ II (50%). T s OR (t su t chênh - Odd ratio - OR) đ t 2,6667 vƠ t s RR (nguy c t ng đ i - relative risk) đ t 2,0000.

4.2. NGH

Kh o sát th c nghi m gen p16INK4 trên nhi u b nh ung th , t ng c ng c m u kh o sát tình tr ng methyl hóa m u ung th Vi t Nam.

Ti p t c ti n hƠnh th c nghi m kh o sát tính ch t methyl hóa k t h p v i các ghi chúv phơn lo i mô h c đ đánh giá kh n ng s d ng tính ch t methyl hóa nƠy nh m t d u ch ng sinh h c (Bio - marker) h u hi u cho b nh ung th vú Vi t Nam.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 62

TÀI LI U THAM KH O

Ti ng Vi t

[1]. Lê Th Trúc Linh, H B o Khuyên, Lê Huy n Ễi Thúy (2010), Xơy d ng quy trình Methylation specific PCR nh m kh o sát m c đ methyl hóa t i các đ o CpG thu c vùng promoter hai gen Trail - R3, Trail - R4 trên các b nh nhơn b ung th c t cung, T p chí Công ngh

sinh h c, 8(3B), tr. 1091 ậ 1096.

Ti ng Anh

[2]. AS B. (1999), Blood , 5(94), pp. 1773 - 1781.

[3]. Baker D.J. (2008), Opposing roles for p16INK4 and p19Arf in senescence and ageing caused by BubR1 insufficiency, Nat Cell Biol, 10(7), pp. 825 - 836.

[4]. Bean G.R. (2007), Morphologically normal - appearing mammary epithelial cells obtained from high - risk women exhibit methylation silencing of INK4a/ARF, Clin Cancer Res, 13(22), pp. 6834 - 6841. [5]. Bearzatto A. (2002), Hypermethylation p16INK4 detected by

Fluorescent Methylation - Specific PCR in plasmas from non - small cell lung cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 3782 (8), pp. 3782 - 3787.

[6]. Carestiato F. N. (2013), An upward trend in DNA p16INK4 methylation pattern and high risk HPV infection according to the severity of the cervicial lesion, Rev Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo, 55(5), pp. 329 - 334.

[7]. Choi B. Y. (2005), The tumor suppressor p16INK4 prevents cell transformation through inhibition of c - Jun phosphorylation and AP - 1 activity, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology Cell Biol., 12, pp. 699 - 707.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 63

[8]. Coleman K.G. (1997), Identification of CDK4 sequences involved in cyclin D1 and p16 binding, J Biol Chem, 272(30), pp. 18869 - 18874.

[9]. Cutts F.T. (2007), Humanpapillo virus and HPV vaccines: a review, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[10]. Das P.M. (2004), DNA methylation and cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(22), pp. 4632 - 4642.

[11]. Deep J. S. (2012), Aberrant methylation in promoters of GSTP1, p16, p14 and RASSF1A genes in smokers of North India, International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Pulmonology, ID 247631, pp. 1 - 6. [12]. Delpu Y. (2013), DNA methylation and cancer diagnosis, Int. J.

Molecular Sciences, 14(7), pp. 15029 - 15058.

[13]. Herman J.G. (1996), Methylation - specific PCR: A novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands, Medical Sciences, 93, pp. 9821 - 9826.

[14]. Hibi K. (2001), Mitochondrial DNA alteration in esophageal cancer, International Journal of Cancer, 92(3), pp. 319 - 321.

[15]. Lee J.J. (2012), Tumor suppressor gene in primary breast cancer tissue and their quantitative p16INK4 hypermethylation in plasma by Real - Time PCR, The Korean Journal of Pathology, 46, pp. 554 - 561. [16]. Hu X.C. (2003), Tumor - derived aberrant methylation in plasma of

invasive ductal breast cancer patients: clinical implications, Oncol. Rep., 10(6),pp. 1811 - 1815.

[17]. Jha A. K. (2012), p16INK4 and p15INK4 gene promoter methylation in cervical cancer patients, Oncology Letters, 3, pp. 1331 - 1335.

[18]. Janzen V. (2006), Stem - cell ageing modified by the cyclin - dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4, Nature, 443, pp. 421 - 426.

[19]. Jarmalaite S. (2003), Aberrant p16 promoter methylation in smokers and former smokers with nonsmall cell lung cancer,

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 64

Iternational Journal of Cancer,106(6), pp. 913 - 918.

[20]. Jemal A. (2011), Global cancer statistics, CA Cancer J Clin, 61(2), pp. 69 - 90.

[21]. Jennifer B. (2009), Promoter methylation and the detection of breast cancer, Cancer causes control, 20(9), pp. 1539 - 1550.

[22]. Jie G. (2007), Relationship between expression and methylation status of p16INK4 and the proliferative activity odifferent areas' tumour cells in human colorectal cancer, Int J Clin Pract, 61(9), pp. 1523 - 1529.

[23]. Jing F. (2007), Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes BRCA1,p16 and 14 - 3 - 3sigma in serum of sporadic breast cancer patients, Onkologie, 30(1 - 2), pp. 14 - 19.

[24]. Kamb A. (1994), A cell cycle regulator potentially involved in genesis of many tumor types, Science, 264(5157), pp. 436 - 440.

[25]. Kim N.B. (2005), Methylation and expression of p16INK4 tumor suppressor gene in primary colorectal cancer tissues, Internationa Journal of Oncology, 2, pp. 1217 - 1226.

[26]. Jane B.R. (2011), The cell cycle, Campell biology, Chapter 12. [27]. Kim W.Y. (2006), The regulation of INK4/ARF in cancer and

aging, Cell, 127(2), pp. 265 - 275.

[28]. Kim, Y.T. and M. Zhao (2005), Aberrant cell cycle regulation in cervical carcinoma, Yonsei Medical, 46(5), pp. 597 - 613.

[29]. Krishnamurthy J. (2004), INK4/ Arf expression is a Bio - marker of aging, J Clin Invest, 114, pp. 1299 - 1307.

[30]. Laird, P.W. (2003), The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers, Nature Publishing Group, 3.

[31]. Latest world cancer statistics Global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: Marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed, (2013), International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 65

[32]. Le T.T.L., Ho T.B.P., Ton N.T.K., Doan T.P.T, Le H.A.T. (2011), Appraisal of potential methylation Bio - markers: BRCA1, p16INK4, cyclin D2, GSTP1, RASSF1A in breast cancer early detection, Journal of Science and Technology, 49(1A), pp. 329 - 337.

[33]. Li J. (2002), Novel insights into the INK4 - CDK4/6 - Rb pathway: counter action of gankyrin against INK4 proteins regulates the CDK4 - mediated phosphorylation of Rb, Biochemistry, 41, pp. 3977 - 3983. [34]. Li J. (2011), The Regulatory Mechanisms of Tumor Suppressor

p16INK4 and Relevance to Cancer, Biochemistry, 25(50), pp. 5566 - 5582.

[35]. Liggett W.H. (1998), Role of the p16 Tumor Suppressor Gene in Cancer, Jounnal of Clinical Oncology, (16)3, pp. 1197 - 1206.

[36]. Lo P. K. (2008), Epigenomics and breast cancer, Pharmacogenomics, (9)12, pp. 1879 - 1902.

[37]. LoF - Ohlin Z.M. (2011), Hypermethylation of promoter regions of the APC1A and p16INK4genes in relation to prognosis and tumor characteristics in cervical cancer, International Journal of Oncology, 39, pp. 683 - 688.

[38]. Lu Q. (2012), DNA methylation changes in cervicial cancer, Cancer Epignetics Method in Molecular Biology, 863, pp. 155 - 176. [39]. Malhotra P. (2010), Aberrant promoter methylation of p16 in

colorectal adenocarcinoma in North Indian patients, World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2(7), pp. 295 - 303.

[40]. Man J.H. (2010), Gankyrin plays an essential role in Ras - induced tumorigenesis through regulation of the RhoA/ROCK pathway in mammalian cells, J Clin Invest, 120, pp. 2829 - 2841.

[41]. Marcus W. K. (2013), Epigenetic changes in patients with multiple sclerosis, Nature Reviews Neurology ,9, pp. 35 - 43.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 66

hypermethylome, Human Molecular Genetics, 16(1), pp. 50 - 59. [43]. Matouk Charles C. (2008), Epigenetic Regulation of Vascular

Endothelial Gene Expression, Circulation Research, 102(8), pp. 873 - 887.

[44]. Mohammed A. (2009), Status of p16INK4 and E - Cadheringene promoter methylation in Moroccan patients with cervical carcinoma, Oncology Research, 18, pp. 1 - 100 .

[45]. Molofsky AV. (2006), Increasing p16INK4 expression decreases forebrain progenitors and neurogenesis during aging, Nature, 443(7110), pp. 448 - 452.

[46]. Nakayama G. (2007), p16 Methylation in Serum as a potential marker for the malignancy of colorectal carcinoma, Anticancer Reasearch, 27 (5A), pp. 3367 - 3370.

[47]. Nephew K.P. (2002), Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer initiation and progression, Cancer Letters, 190(2), pp. 125 - 133.

[48]. Nguyen H.L. (2010), Cost of treatment for breast cancer in central Vietnam, Glob Health Action, 6: 18872.

[49]. Ono A. (2011), Epigenetic aberrant hypermethylation of DNA in endometrial cancer: application as a Bio - marker, Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2, pp. 610 - 615.

[50]. Lamy A. (2002), Aberant methylation of the CDKN2A/p16 gene promoter regionon prevasive bronchial leison: aprospectives study in high - SK patients without invasive cancer, Int. J. Cancer, 100(2), pp. 189 - 193.

[51]. Ota N. (2006), Prognostic significance of hypermethylation p16INK4 in non - small cell lung cancer is evident by quantitative DNA methylation analysis, Anticancer Research, 26, pp. 3729 - 3732.

[52]. Peter B., World cancer Report 2008 [online], WHO press, The International Agency for Research Cancer (IARC).

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 67

[53]. Portela A. (2010), Epigenetic modifications and human disease, Nature biotechnology, 28(10), pp. 1057 - 1067.

[54]. Russo A.A. (1998), Structural basis for inhibition of the cyclin - dependent kinase Cdk6 by the tumour suppressor p16INK4, J. Nature, 395(6699), pp. 237 - 243

[55]. Serizawa H. (1998), Cyclin - dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4 inhibits phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II by general transcription factor TFIIH, J Biol Chem, 273(10), pp. 5427 - 5430. [56]. Sharma G. (2007), Promoter hypermethylation of p16INK4,

p14ARF, CyclinD2 and Slit2 in serum and tumor DNA from breast cancer patients, Life Sci, 80(20), pp. 1873 - 1881.

[57]. Sharma S. (2010), Epigenetics in cancer, Carcinogenesis, 31(1), pp. 27 - 36.

[58]. Sherr CJ. (1999), CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1 - phase progression, Genes Dev., 13(12), pp. 1501 - 1512

[59]. Shima K. (2011), Prognostic significance of CDKN2A (p16) promoter methylation and loss of expression in 902 colorectal cancers: cohort study and literature review, Int J Cance, 128(5), pp. 1080 - 1094.

[60]. Shin E. A. (2009), p16INK4 methylation and the correlation to immunohistochemical expression in cervical neoplasia, Journal of Women’s Medicine, 2(1).

[61]. Smith J.R. (1996), Replicative senescence: implications for in vivo aging and tumor suppression, Science, 273(5271), pp. 63 - 67.

[62]. Spathis A. (2011), Promoter Methylation of p16INK4, hMLH1, And MGMT In Liquid - Based cervical cytology samples compared with clinicopathological findings and HPV presence, Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, ID 927861, pp. 1 - 5.

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 68

[63]. Szalmas A. (2009), Epigenetic alterations in cervical carcinogenesis, Semin Cancer Biol, 19(3), pp. 144 - 52.

[64]. Szyf M., (2008), The role of DNA hypermethylation and demethylation in cancer and cancer therapy, Current Oncology, 15(2), pp. 72 - 75.

[65]. Tsao H. (1998), Novel mutations in the p16/CDKN2A binding region of the cyclin - dependent kinase - 4 gene, Cancer Res, 58(1), pp. 109 - 113.

[66]. Vallian S. (2009), Methylation status of p16INK4 tumor suppressor gene in Iranian patients with sporadic breast cancer, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 135(8), pp. 991 - 996.

[67]. Veganzones - de - Castro S. (2012), p16 gene methylation in colorectal cancer patients with long - term follow - up, Reveso Ennferm Dig, 104(3), pp: 111 - 117

[68]. Vinci D. A. (2005), p16INK4 promoter methylation and protein expression in breast fibroadenoma, International Journal of Cancer, 114, pp. 414 - 421.

[69]. Voyatzi S. (2010), Promoter methylation of p16INK4, RASSF1A, and RAR2 genes in tumor DNA from patients with breast cancer (BC) in correlation with clinical recurrence, Journal finical Oncology, 28(15), 1551.

[70]. Walkley C.R. (2006), Rb is dispensable for self - renewal and multilineage differentiation of adult hematopoietic stem cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(24), pp. 9057 - 9062.

[71]. Yang H.J. (2004), Detection of hypermethylated genes in tumor and plasma of cervical cancer patients, Gynecologic Oncology, 93, pp. 435 - 440.

[72]. Yang L. (2006), Aberrant promoter methylation of p16 and MGMT genes in lung tumors from smoking and never - smoking lung cancer

Lý Th Tuy t Ng c Trang 69

patients, Neoplasia, 8(1), pp. 46 - 51.

[73]. Yoruker E.E. (2012), Promoter and histone methylation and p16 gene expression in colon cancer, Experimental and therapeutic medicine ,4(5), pp. 865 - 870.

[74]. Zhao Y. F. (2010), Methylation and expression of gene p16INK4and RB in breast carcinoma, NCBI, 39(6), pp. 377 - 381.

[75]. Frederique M. (2001), Selective association of the methyl - CpG binding protein MBD2 with the silent p14/p16 locus in human neoplasia , 98(9), pp. 4990 - 4995.

[76]. Yakov C. (2005), Melanoma genetics and the development of rational therapeutics, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 115: pp.

Một phần của tài liệu Khảo sát tình trạng Methyl hóa gen p16INK4α tại các đảo CpG thuộc vùng Promoter trên một số bệnh ung thư (Trang 69)

Tải bản đầy đủ (PDF)

(84 trang)