TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
TAI LIEU TIENG ANH
L Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alem, F., Plaisent, M., Zuccaro, C., & Bernard, P. (2016). Measuring e- learning readiness concept: scale development and validation using structural equation modeling. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e- Management and e-Learning, 6(4), 193.
Almrashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M. & Alsmadi, M. (2011), Distance
leaming management system requirements from student’s perspective.
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 24(1), 17-27.
Baris, M. F. (2015). Future of E-Learning: Perspective of European teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,
11(2), 421-429.
Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. London, UK: Routledge Bolliger, D. U, Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers &
Education, 55, 714-722.
Cheng. K. (2006). A research study on students’ level of acceptance in applying E-learning for business courses - A case study on a technical college in Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 265-270.
10.Chyung, S. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self- efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213-222
aT
11.Compeau, D. R.. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy:
Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
12. Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education, 53(1), 121-131
13.Dabbagh, N. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005), Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Davis, D. F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Journal,
13(3), 319-340.
15. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management
Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
16. Despotovié-Zraki¢, M., Markovié, A., Bogdanovié, Z., Baraé, D., & Kréo, S.
(2012). Providing adaptivity in Moodle LMS courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 326-338.
17. Fee, K. H. (2005). Delivering E-learning: A complete strategy for design application and assessment. London, UK: Kogan Page
18. Fishbein, M& Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to the theory and research, Addison- Wesley, 11 - 18.
19. Fishbein, M. (1967). Readings in attitude theory and measurement. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
20.Geten, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of email: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
21.Gomez, J. F. (2015), Higher education faculty use of a learning management system in face-toface classes. PhD Thesis. California State University.
22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L.
(1998). Multivariate data analysis.
23. Horton, W. (2011). E-learning by design. John Wiley and Sons.
78
24.Howlett, D., Vincent, T., Gainsborough. N., Fairelough, J., Taylor, N., &
Vincent, 2009. Integration of a CaseBased Online Module into an Undergraduate Curriculum: What is involved and is it effective? Online Learning, 6 (4), 372-384
25.Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C., & Own, Z. (2010). Leamer readiness for
online learning: Scale development and student perceptions, Computers and Education, 55(3), 1080-1090
26. Iwata, J.. & Clayton, J. (2008). Using a perceptual measure to evaluate students’ acceptance of digitally-created English learning content.
27. Kabassi, K., Dragonas, I., Ntouzevits, A., Pomonis, T., Papastathopoulos, G.
& Vozaitis, Y. (2016), Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education, SpringerPlus, 5(101), 2-12.
DOI 10.1186/s40064-0 16-1705-8
28.Kalinga, E. A. (2010), Development of an Interactive eLearning Management System (Elms) for Tanzanian Secondary Schools. PhD, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
29.Kasim, N. N. M. & Khalid, F. (2016), Choosing the Right Leaming Management System (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review. Jnternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(6), 55-61.
30. Khoa, B. T., Ha, N. M., Nguyen, T. V. H., & Bich, N. H. (2020). Lecturers’
adoption to use the online Learning Management System (LMS): Empirical evidence from TAM2 model for Vietnam. Hemcoujs-Economics and Business Administration, 10 (1), 3-17
31.Kulshrestha, T. & Kant, A. R. (2013) Benefits of learming management system (LMS) in Indian education, Jnternational Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Technology (IJCSET), 4(8), 1153-1154.
32. Lewis, A. L. (2016), Developmental English Professors’ Experiences with Learning Management Systems at An Urban Community College:
79
Challenges, Benefits, And Other Perceptions. Dissertation Published by ProQuest LLC
33.Lin, C. F. (2007). A study of customer intention and its antecedents on e- commerce of travel industry (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan, (In Chinese).
34.Lin, C.-H., Shih, H.-Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TAM model. Psychology &
Marketing, 24, 641-657.
35.Lonn, S. & Teasley, S. D. (2009), Saving time or innovating practice:
Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems.
Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694.
36.Lopes, A., (2011), Teaching with Moodle in Higher Education. In proceedings of INTED201 1 — Intemational Technology, Education and Development Conference. Cd ISBN: 978-84-614- 7423-3, and in Abstracts
Cd ISBN: 978-84-6 14-7422-6.
37.Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 29-39.
38. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. /nternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1-16.
39.M. R. Solomon, D. W. Dahl, K. White, J. L. Zaichkowsky va R. Polegato, Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being vol. 10: Pearson, 2014
40. Mo, C. Y., Hsieh, T. H., Lin, C. L., Jin, Y. Q., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Exploring the critical factors, the online learning continuance usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(10), 5471.
41.Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth
80
42.Morris, L.. Wu, S., & Finnegan, C. (2005). Predicting retention in online general education courses. The American Journal of Distance Education,
19(1), 23-36.
43.Mtebe, J. S. (2015), Leaming Management System success: Increasing Learning Management System usage in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(2), 51-64.
44, Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, D. T., & Cao, T. H. (2014). Acceptance and Use of Cloud-based E-learning. VNUHCM Journal of Science and Technology Development, 17(3), 71-87.
45. Oliveira, P. C., Almeida, C. J. C. & Nakayama, C. M. K. (2016), Learning Management Systems (LMS) and E-Learning Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. JISTEM — Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 157— 180.
46. Patel, F. (2014). Online Learning: An Educational Development Perspective.
New York: Nova Science Publishers.
47. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston, MA:
Pitman Boston.
48.Pifia, A. A. (2010), Learning Management Systems: An Overview. In Kats, Y. Learning Management System Technologies and Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications. Information Science Reference: New York.
49.Pifia, A. A. (2013), Learning Management Systems: A Look at the Big Picture. In Kats, Y. (Eds.), Learning Management Systems and Instructional Design: Best Practices in Online Education (pp. 1-19).
50. Pomerantz, J., & Brooks, D. C. (2017). ECAR study of faculty and information technology, 97(80), 94.
51. Richardson, J. C., York, C. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2014). Online Learning:
Common Misconceptions and Benefits and Challenges. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
81
52.Roblyer, M. D., Davis, L., Mills, S. C., Marshall, J., & Pape, L. (2008).
Toward practical procedures for predicting and promoting success in virtual school students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 90-109.
53.Ruth C. Clark, & Richard E. Mayer, (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia
Learning. Fourth Edition
54.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations:
classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
55. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306 56. Solomon M. R., D. W. Dahl, K. White, J. L. Zaichkowsky and R. Polegato,
Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being vol. 10: Pearson, 2014
57.Tabachnick B.G. and Fidell L.S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics, HarperCollins College, New York.
58. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in human behavior, 41, 153-163.
59. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739-755.
60. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2),
144-176.
61.Tello, S. (2004). Instructional interaction: Key to student persistence?
Distance Education Report, 8(12), 11-3.
62.Tello, S. (2004). Instructional interaction: Key to student persistence?
Distance Education Report, 8(12), 11-3.
82
63.Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51-66.
64. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915. 2008.00192.x
65. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Mfanagement Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
66. Watkins, R., Leigh, D., & Triner D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e- learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66 -79.
67. Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Goh, P. S.C. (2015). Understanding the intention to use interactive whiteboards: Model development and testing. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 731-747.
68.Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1902-1911
83