1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Luận văn thạc sĩ tác động của động lực phụng sự công, sự hài lòng trong công việc và sự cam kết với tổ chức

119 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 119
Dung lượng 1,78 MB

Nội dung

Ngày đăng: 12/07/2021, 10:45

Nguồn tham khảo

Tài liệu tham khảo Loại Chi tiết
4. Barrick, Murray R., Mount, Michael K, 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 1991, 44.1:1-26 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Personnel psychology, 1991, 44.1
15. Lewis and Frank, 2002.“Who Wants to Work for the Government?” Public Administration Review 62(4): 395-404 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Who Wants to Work for the Government?”
3. Balfour and Wechsler, 1996. Organizational Commitment: Antecedents and Outcomes in Public Service Organizations, Public Productivity and Management Review 19(3): 77-256 Khác
5. Benkhoff, 1997. Disentangling Organizational Commitment: The Dangers of the OCQ for Research and Policy, Personnel Review 26(1/2): 31-114 Khác
6. Brewer, 2008. Employee and Organizational Performance, in J.L. Perry and A.Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 56-136. Oxford: Oxford University Press Khác
7. Bright and Leonard, 2007. Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration 27(4): 79-361 Khác
8. Castaing, 2006. The Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Commitment in the French Civil Service, Public Policy and Administration 21(1): 84-98 Khác
9. Fisher, 1980. On the Dubious Wisdom of Expecting Job Satisfaction to Correlate with Performance, Academy of Management Review 5(4): 12-607 Khác
10. John P. Meyer, Natalie J. Allen, and Catherine A. Smith, 1993. Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three- Component Conceptualization Khác
11. Judge, Timothy A., et al, 2001. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review Khác
13. Kim, Sangmook, 2011. Testing a Revised Measurement of Public Service Motivation: Reflective versus Formative Specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 46-521 Khác
14. Kim, Sangmook and Wouter Vandenabeele, 2010. A Strategy for Building Public Service Motivation Research Internationally. Public Administration Review 70(5): 9-701 Khác
16. Locke, 1976. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by Marvin D. Dunnette, 1297- 1343. Chicago: Rand McNally Khác
17. Meyer and Allen, 1991. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review 1(1): 61-98 Khác
18. Meyer, Allen and Smith, 1993. Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extensions and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization.Journal of Applied Psychology 78(4): 51-538 Khác
19. Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K, 2007. Finding workable levers over work motivation comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803-832 Khác
20. Naff and Crum, 1999. Working for America: Does PSM make a Difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration 19(4): 5–16 Khác
21. Pablo Alonso and Gregory B. Lewis, 2001. Public Service Motivation and Job Performance: Evidence from the Federal Sector; The American Review of Public Administration Khác
24. Reichers, 1985. A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment, Academy of Management Review 10(3): 76-465 Khác
25. Riketta, 2002. Attitudinal Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 23: 66-257 Khác

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w