Evaluate the impacts of ftas on vietnam iron and steel trade flows under asean 3 gravity model analysis

EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF FTAS ON VIETNAM IRON AND STEEL TRADE FLOWS UNDER ASEAN+3: GRAVITY MODEL ANALYSIS1 Dr Nguyen Anh Thu Do Thi Mai Hien University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi Abstract This paper analyzes the impacts of all FTAs in the ASEAN+3 region which Vietnam has signed on Vietnam Iron and Steel trading status In this respect, a gravity model is used with panel data an dordinary least-squares (OLS) regression method covering 27 top trading countries from 2001 to 2012 The final gains of the paper is to point out clearly the positive impact of ACFTA and VJEPA on increasing import flows of iron and steel into Vietnam while AKFTA, AFTA and VJEPA has played positive effects on exporting AJCEP and AFTA are concluded to have little impact on both import and export volume Besides, effects of other determinants apart from FTAs on trading status are also gained after this paper Tóm tắt Bài nghiên cứu sâu đánh giá tác động Hiệp định thương mại tự (FTA) mà Việt Nam ký kết khu vực ASEAN+3 hoạt động xuất nhập mặt hàng sắt thép Việt Nam Phương pháp mơ hình trọng lực sử dụng với nguồn liệu dạng bảng, ước lượng bình phương nhỏ nhất, chạy hồi quy mẫu liệu bao gồm lưu lượng xuất khẩu, nhập mặt hàng sắt thép với Việt Nam với 27 quốc gia có cán cân thương mại xuất nhập lớn với Việt Nam mặt hàng sắt thép từ năm 2001 đến năm 2012 Bài nghiên cứu Hiệp định ASEAN- Trung Quốc (ACFTA) Hiệp định song phương Việt Nam- Nhật Bản (VJEPA) có tác động thuận với hoạt động nhập mặt hàng sắt thép Việt Nam hiệp định ASEAN - Hàn Quốc (AKFTA), Hiệp định thương mại tự (AFTA) có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến hoạt động xuất mặt hàng sắt thép Việt Nam ẠJCEP AFTA ghi nhận hiệp định chưa có nhiều tác động đến hoạt động ngoại thương ngành sắt thép Việt Nam Mức độ ảnh hưởng nhân tố khác hiệp định hoạt động xuất nhập sắt thép Việt Nam nghiên cứu Introduction The research could not be completed without kind support of Mr Nguyen Thanh Tung, Mr Pham Van Nho and Mr Nguyen Tri Si We are truly grateful to say thank to all of them Any remaining mistakes are by the authors alone The establishment of FTAs has been regarded as a commitment between member nations towards a free trade area The impacts of increasing Regional trade agreements over years have been figured out in several industries Iron and steel industry is known as a sensitive industry in Vietnam which also under the significant effects of free trade agreements In this paper, the author tries to address main concern about the impacts of FTAs under ASEAN+3 on Vietnam Iron and Steel industry How is the current status of tariff reduction of Vietnam iron and steel industry under FTAs? Up to now, what is the trading status of Vietnam Iron and Steel Industry in ASEAN+3? These questions are all explored carefully In this study, Reveal Comparative Advantage Index (RCA) of Vietnam iron and steel industry is calculated to show how competitive is iron and steel in Vietnam’s export compared to the product’s exports in relations to its share in the world trade while Export and import intensity index are cultivated to measure which nations Vietnam has larger share in export and import iron and steel More importantly, to have a clear answer about the effect level of FTAs on trading flows of iron and steel products, a gravity model approach is used Basing upon the available of information, data used in the model are from 2001 to 2012 from trusted sources The paper is divided into five major sections First, a brief introduction about the content of the paper is pointed out Second part is a specific review of the methodology of all previous researches While in some ways, the paper is quite similar to the works of URATA Shujiro and OKABE Misa (2007) in having depicted an image of trade flows under the effects of FTAs, or Sohn, Chan-Hyun (2001) in using the gravity model analysis to work out the relationship between the trading flows and regional trading agreements, especially Nguyen Tien Dung (2011), this study still become unique in applying gravity model in a new scope which is the iron and steel trade flows of Vietnam under ASEAN+3.There has not been any study applying gravity model on Vietnam iron and steel trade flows Section analyzes an integration of Vietnam Iron and Steel Industry in ASEAN+3 in terms of the openness level of FTAs, competitive advantage of Vietnam iron and steel industry in the regional integration and the change of trading volume of Vietnam iron and steel industry after FTAs Section applies the gravity model approach in clarifying whether FTAs has effects on iron and steel export and imports The final remaining part is followed to make a conclusion and recommendations for Vietnam towards the integration in ASEAN+3 Methodology In this paper, the separate influences of FTAs and other variables are quantized by percentage change of trading flows The author uses gravity model to quantize the impacts of Free trade Agreement on the import, export value of iron and steel industry with supports of economic software eview 6.0 in order to examine the impact of the FTAs on trade flows by controlling the factors other than tariff reduction Over the world, there have been a number of researches focusing on the analysis of the effects of FTAs especially ones using gravity model to clarify the impacts of FTAs within region on significant sectors of a country The first formulations of the gravity model equation are found in Timbergen (1962), Pöyhönen (1963) They applied to the gravity equation to analyze international trade flows Since then, the gravity model has become popular instrument in empirical foreign trade flows Initially, the gravity model is used for explaining the exports from country i to country j which depends on the economic sizes (GDP or GNP), their populations, direct geographical distance and a set of dummies incorporating some kind of institutional characteristics common to specific flows In the second half of the 1970s several theoretical developments have emerged in support specifically the gravity model Anderson (1979) made the formal attempt to derive the gravity equation by adding assumption of product differentiation In 1995, Deadorff also proved that the gravity equation could be justified from standard trade theories Up to now, the trend using the gravity model analysis to evaluate the effects of FTAs on trade flows has been increasing sharply The standard gravity model use variables as followed: Real GDP, income gap (to account for intra-industry trade and level of income), a measure of remoteness, adjacency and geographical characteristics such as being landlocked The original gravity equation looks as follows: = In which: A, a, b, c are the parameters to be estimated The equation’s logarithmic transformation is given by: Log = + a.Log + b.Log + c.Log The gravity model has been widely applied in international trade studies Its popularity is due to the concept simplicity, its appropriateness to match well with the available data and the models’ econometric estimation Depend upon the significant purposes of the studies, the gravity model analysis is added more variables in many researches to apply effectively the examination of the relationship among several factors in international trade cases Determining suitable variables is one of the primary and most important requirements in setting up econometric models to attain precise economic results This section provides analysis and explanations for variables used in the models The starting point of building up the models is based on the following specification of the gravity model: In which: represents trade flows (exports or imports) between country and country “i” is the GDP of country “i” represents the Distance between country and country “i” is Dummy variable indicating to which Regional and Preferential Trade Agreement a particular country belongs: “i” runs from to 5, reflecting respectively AFTA, ASEAN-China, ASEAN-Korea, ASEAN-Japan, Japan-Vietnam Economic Partnership Agreement represents -Membership in the specific FTAs, representing 0-otherwise In the simple form, the gravity equation can be re-written by logarithmic transformation as bellows: LOG( ) = C + LOG( )+ LOG( )+ LOG( )+ In which: Σ (Sij) represents other variables that affect trade like history, language, land locked, borders for example Σ (Sij) represents for Colonial ties, Common language, Landlocked, Common borders; and Σ (Sij) equals for otherwise It is depend upon the paper’s purpose which is to build up the appropriate model to clarify out the answer for the research questions, the relationship between trade flows and various explanatory variables will be estimated by ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression methods For this paper, in order to evaluate the impacts of FTAs in ASEAN+3 region which Vietnam has signed until now, including AFTA, ACFTA, AKFTA, AJCEP, VJEPA on the Vietnam iron and steel industry, the author has made decision of using the gravity model to cultivate how much these FTA affect the Vietnam iron and steel industry’s trading This model will be hoped to analyze the trade flows of Vietnam Iron and Steel products with other nations on the account of the several factors, such as Real GDP, Real GDP per capita, Real exchange rate, Income Gap, Distance between countries The author hope that this gravity model will indicates whether FTAs affected the Vietnam iron and steel industry in the scope of research, FTAs increase or decrease the trading flows of Vietnam iron and steel industry with ASEAN+3 nations compared to the previous normal trades flows To examine the impacts of FTAs, dummy variables are added into the model If these dummy variables have positive and significant coefficients, this means that FTA will have a good effect of accelerating the trade flows among countries The gravity model in this study will have general variables in the standard gravity model and such a number of additional dummy variables of FTAs, Border and Land locked Lack of coastline increases the time and cost of transportation as well as the dependence on the quality of the infrastructure network across the region as a whole, particularly that of the neighboring countries Besides, the author also finds that the increase in total trade of iron and steel products of Vietnam comes from improvement in infrastructure, followed by logistics and efficiency of customs and other border agencies The non-tariff barriers also are taken into consideration, as the main challenges of exporting iron and steel of Vietnam into other countries in ASEAN seems to be the nontariff barriers imposed by the home countries’ government, besides tariff The FTAs dummy were put into this equation are the FTAs membership When adding FTAs dummy, this paper mentions to the impacts of being membership of FTAs in general After all, there were many motives from the author to examine the effects of several factors on Vietnam iron and steel trade flow, however, depending on the availability of the data base, the author will build the exporting model and importing model as bellowed: (i) (ii) Log Log = = + + Log + + Log + Log + + + + Log + + + + + In here: and are the export volume and import volume of Vietnam Iron and steel products to the country j, Gap is the differences of Real GDP per capita of Vietnam and the country j; Distw is the geographical distance from Vietnam to country j are the dummy variables measuring the which is standardized for populations; impacts of FTAs membership on the export and import flows between Vietnam and the countries Export and Import flows (Yi) measured in dollars; Real GDP and Gap measured in dollars, Distance are in thousands of kilometers, Borders represents if they share a common border and otherwise The FTAs dummy represents if the trading partner is not the member of corresponding FTA and if the trading partner is the member of that FTA since the year FTA goes into effects Consequently, the dummy variables AFTA, ACFTA, AKFTA, AJCEP and VJEPA will be since the following years, respectively, 2006, 2006, 2007 and 2010 for the AJCEP, VJEPA Landlocked equals if the trading country j is landlocked, otherwise The author choose those years as from this years, such a significant tariff elimination of FTAs has been practically undertaken on Vietnam iron and steel products and have big effects on Iron and steel industry trades Besides, some other important index in international trade is also used in this study Firstly, the Reveal Comparative Advantage Index (RCA) of Vietnam iron and steel industry is calculated to show how competitive is iron and steel in Vietnam’s export compared to the product’s exports in relations to its share in the world trade The equation to calculate RCA is shown below: Where and are the values of Vietnam’s exports of iron and steel products and world exports of iron and steel; and represents Vietnam’s total exports and world total exports Secondly, other indexes which are also cultivated are Export Intensity Index and Import intensity Indices These indices reflects the ratio of the share of country i’s trade with country j relative to the share of the world trade destined for country j They can be defined as follows: Where: world : Country i’s exports to country j; : country j’s total imports from the world; country i’s total imports from the world; country j’s total exports to the world; : country i’s total exports to the : world total imports; : : country i’s exports to country j; : : world total exports Data The model uses the export and import statistics from UN COMTRADE data base from the year 2001 to 2012 as the availability of Vietnam’s data base in this period Real GDP are sourced from World Bank; the Gap is calculated from Real GDP per capita taken from World Bank; Distw; Border and Landlocked are taken from CEPII There are total 27 top trading partners in iron and steel which are recorded in the model for the period 2001-2012 from the data base of UNCOMTRADE2 According to Economic theory, real GDP will correlate positively with trade activities Higher income levels will lead to higher demand on the trading of goods Therefore, the volume of exchange goods will be greater Iron and steel are the typical goods following that trend Distances are supposed to have negative impact on both exporting and importing The farther the distance is, the higher transportation costs might be High transportation cost will hinder the exchanges of goods among nations In other words, the greater the distance is, the less trade between countries is The Income Gap variable is calculated as the differences between real GDP per capita of each countries and it is used to check out whether the trade depends on intra-trade or inter-trade It may be positive or negative When the coefficient of this variable is positive, this means trade flows are mainly depend upon the inter-industry trade based on differences in factors of production resources In contrast, if the income gap has a negative sign, it shows impact of intra-industry trade Data used in the model are from 2001 to 2012, and is collected from trusted sources such as:  Real GDPs, real GDP per capita (taken fixed 2005 USD’s price), are taken from in the World Bank’s World Development Indicators  Export and import flows is picked up from WIST Trading partners are used in this model: Australia, Belgium, Benin, Brunei, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Haiti, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Lao, Malaysia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Philippines, Russia Singapore, Thailand, United Kingdom and United States Myanmar is excluded as the lack of statistics  Distances, border and landlocked are taken from the Centre d’Etudes Prospectives at d’InformationsInternationales (CEPII) Econometric results Table I: RCA for ASEAN+3 countries in Iron and Steel industry Country 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Thailand 0.38 0.44 0.49 0.48 0.45 0.42 0.74 0.40 0.31 0.30 0.27 0.50 Philippines 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.18 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.09 Brunei 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 Malaysia 0.19 0.36 0.43 0.28 0.32 0.47 0.38 0.27 0.40 0.38 0.31 0.23 Indonesia 0.29 0.34 0.44 0.30 0.46 0.36 0.40 0.23 0.31 0.26 0.17 0.15 Singapore 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.27 0.18 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.23 Lao 0.04 0.06 0.45 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 Cambodia 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.01 Myanmar _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0.01 0.02 Vietnam 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.21 0.22 0.28 0.88 0.32 0.61 0.72 0.43 China 0.46 0.36 0.36 0.70 0.72 0.94 1.07 1.15 0.50 0.71 0.79 0.77 Korea 1.84 1.60 1.69 1.51 1.65 1.56 1.44 1.55 1.91 1.81 1.87 1.97 Japan 1.51 1.63 1.53 1.36 1.50 1.46 1.37 1.54 2.19 1.96 1.93 2.11 Source: Calculated by the author from the data base of UN COMTRADE From the table I, the outstanding outcome to be noted is the RCA of Vietnam in Iron and steel industry appear to be the highest index compared to ASEAN nations in each year from 2001 to 2012 The computation of RCA for iron and steel showed that Vietnam has developed comparative advantage in the product category over the period of time The general trend of RCA through years was upward trend and on account of the further integration of Vietnam into the international market, RCA of Vietnam has been hoped to keep increasing in the near future Nevertheless, the RCA of Vietnam was below one We aware that RCA were regarded as low if it is below one and strong if it is over one or two The case of Vietnam, all of RCA index over years were still below 1, which reveals that Vietnam seemed not to have comparative advantages in iron and steel products This industry depends on the availability of natural resources in country and the development of the industry A snapshot of Vietnam iron and steel industry in the integration phase can explain clearly why Vietnam has comparative disadvantage in iron and steel industry, although the role of this industry is typically important for the reform of country Besides, the RCA of ASEAN nations were below one, in other words, all of these countries got comparative disadvantage with big trading partner China, Korea, Japan Therefore, most of the ASEAN countries including Vietnam, can facilitate importing iron and steel from Japan, China and Korea in ASEAN+3 region Apart from measuring the competitive advantages of Vietnam iron and steel with other nations, the trade intensities is the typical index for pointing out the share of Vietnam iron and steel trade with another country The value of index may range from to 100 It reflects that country is importing more (or less) from country j than might be expected from that country’s share in total world trade In export side, if the value is or nearer to 0, it implies that export link between these countries is negligible and if the value is nearer to 100 that indicates that the performance is relatively significant and if it exceeds 100 it reveals that a country export more than expected with the other countries The trade intensity is usually divided into the export intensity and import intensity Singapore Philippines Cambodia Japan Korea China Lao 4.13 3.10 11.52 2.96 0.69 1696.95 0.97 0.67 0.99 398.24 EII 5.31 6.64 4.46 1.68 19.66 126.95 2.14 1.58 6.22 MII 17.09 1.68 14.36 1.27 3.73 1091.63 0.74 1.13 1.50 EII 5.32 8.53 13.97 0.83 12.16 205.35 1.79 1.31 4.60 MII 12.58 5.93 5.01 5.88 29.40 498.26 0.17 0.97 0.32 EII 6.51 7.13 8.69 1.11 4.83 86.95 2.27 2.26 3.18 MII 11.29 3.47 14.68 2.91 9.83 247.04 0.54 0.76 0.33 EII 4.59 8.72 12.39 0.97 2.40 53.12 1.53 2.19 3.00 MII 8.91 2.09 10.98 3.86 5.25 234.72 1.63 1.81 1.47 EII 2.99 6.49 12.91 1.33 1.63 119.23 1.81 3.16 3.29 MII 8.96 4.86 8.54 3.39 9.90 154.53 2.06 1.33 0.93 EII 3.40 5.75 9.19 1.54 1.97 0.53 2.43 3.72 2.53 MII 10.15 4.57 8.77 2.10 7.09 110.61 2.80 0.84 0.53 EII 2.70 1.29 3.35 2.04 0.98 67.24 2.58 3.12 3.01 Year Thailand MII Indonesia Malaysia Table II: Vietnam’s Export and Import intensity index with ASEAN+3 countries, sector: Iron and steel industry 2006 546.35 2007 369.00 2008 246.48 2009 152.84 2010 308.42 2011 2012 106.08 Source: Computed from Trade Map Statistics The table II demonstrates that Vietnam’s export intensity and import intensity index are mostly greater than one with all ASEAN+3 nations in iron and steel industry, implying a strong link between Vietnam and individual members with associated FTAs in the region Vietnam’s import intensity index (MII) was quite small with Japan for many years before 2010 but has improved strongly after signing the VJEPA Vietnam’s export has forced with Singapore recently, while declined with several countries, namely Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia Cambodia and Lao become outstanding with high value of export intensity index (EII) and MII with Vietnam, this comes froma low total volume in both total export and import of these two country which the volume with Vietnam plays a majority of This section, through the statistical analysis of trade intensity and RCA, the strength and nature of bilateral trading relationships between countries, is examined Some concluding remarks are achieved Vietnam has comparative disadvantage in iron and steel industry Meanwhile, Korea, China and Japan, with high RCA index of more than one are confirmed to have comparative advantage in iron and steel sectors ASEAN nations have lower RCA than these big countries Vietnam, in near future might keep importing more from China, Japan and Korea The export and import intensity indices have proved for this trend, especially after the years of FTAs establishment A last thing to note is a strong trading relation among countries in iron and steel industry The table III gives the results for the regression coefficients of all variables for Exports and Imports model Almost all the standard gravity variables have the expected and statistically significant sign Besides, R-squared value in export and import model are respectively 0.657 and 0.554, quite high and be accepted for depicting the export and import equation Table III: The econometric results Export model Log Log Import model 0.496*** 0.661*** (0.00) (0.00) 8.088*** 2.765*** (0.00) (0.00) 0.03 -0.031 (0.66) (0.6263) -1.689*** -0.389*** (0.00) (0.0047) Export model AFTA Import model 0.986* -1.910*** (0.145) (0.0038) -0.735 2.559*** (0.257) (0.001) 1.556** -0.186 (0.012) (0.757) -1.631*** -1.1097** (0.005) (0.0478) 1.614* 2.366** (0.131) (0.0235) 1.779*** -1.511*** (0.0001) (0.0005) -0.058 -1.246** (0.91) (0.0128) -186.747*** -65.448*** (0.00) (0.00) R-squared 0.657 0.554 Adjusted Rsquared 0.641 0.537 ACFTA AKFTA AJCEP VJEPA Border Landlocked Constant *: p< 0.15, **: p< 0.05, ***: p< 0.01 Source: The author’s calculation Before examining the effects of FTAs on trade flows of Vietnam iron and steel industry, the author does wish to high light the general effects of other concerning variables in the model to check out its impacts on trade flows of Vietnam iron and steel 10 Firstly, Real GDP which measures the economies of scale are seen to have positive sign in both export and import equation It reveals that the growth of economy of Vietnam as well as the trading countries will foster the export and import flows in and out Vietnam In other words, Real GDP factor has positive effects on trading of iron and steel industry More specific, for exporting, the volume will increase respectively by an average of 0.496 percent and 8.09 percent if real GDP of the destination market and Vietnam rise by about unit Importing iron and steel is also under the same positive effect of real GDP as in exporting but with different coefficients Secondly, about the income gap variable, this one appeared to be positive sign in export model and negative sign in importing one but there are no statistical significance in both two equations It can be explained that the exporting iron and steel of Vietnam mainly are related to inter-industry trade with trading partners; meanwhile, the importing iron and steel of Vietnam are intra-trade However, this effect does not play in the trade flows of iron and steel It does not have any significant effects on the exporting and importing volume of Vietnam iron and steel industry Thirdly, distance is recorded at negative sign with both export and importing value This matches with the theory in gravity models Other dummies, like border, landlocked are relatively meet the author’s expectation Border has positive and significant sign in export but negative sign in import equation This comes from the data base that Vietnam seems to export more easily with neighboring countries while imports did not follow that trend The import of Vietnam might be unique for some several reasons Vietnam seems to import more with the markets in which can supply the cheap price but still guarantee suitable quality Having borders with Vietnam, there are only Lao, Cambodia and China Luckily, there is only China having comparative advantages for Vietnam to import Lao, Cambodia, with the same or even lower developed level in iron and steel industry, are likely not the key market to import for Vietnam, even though they have borders advantage However, the exporting to these countries is potential Landlocked, as presented in the previous section, are hindrance for trading activities In the iron and steel equation, landlocked has negative sign in import equation and does not have much effects on exporting The most important part gained from the above table is the FTA’s effects on Vietnam iron and steel trade flows Among all FTAs mentioned, only AKFTA and AJEPA are recorded as having significantly positive sign for exports model AKFTA is noticed as a FTA has positive and significant impact on the export when the coefficient of AKFTA dummy is quite high at 1.556 at a significance level of percent This is appropriate with the fact that from 2010, the export volume of iron and steel to Korea has sharply plunged after 2007 when AKFTA went into force VJEPA remarks a larger impact on exporting when its coefficient reaches a number of 1.614 at the significant level of 15 percent This is consistent with the expected sign from the analysis in previous section AFTA has a coefficient of 0.986 with statistically significant level of 15 percent, indicating that AFTA has relative impact on Vietnam export iron and steel within ASEAN region The complicated trend of Vietnam export flows within ASEAN, as depicted in the chapter might reflect that export flows of Vietnam iron and steel products is largely conflicted over time and it is difficult to clarify out clearly the impact 11 of AFTA on this era in short time but after all, AFTA still is illustrated to force the exports flows of Vietnam ACFTA also does not have significant sign in export equation The author can understand why this result comes out There is the fact that China is a big country of supplying iron and steel globally, the demand for importing this kind of goods are still quite low, besides, there was a downward trend of Vietnam’s export flows to China recently, this causes a negative sign of ACFTA but no statistically significant In term of importing model, ACFTA become the key FTA having positive and statistically significant coefficient An increase of about 2.559 percent in import value will be gained from the establishment of ACFTA Meanwhile, VJFTA creates an average increase of 2.366 percent of import volume From the view of iron and steel sector, China and Japan are two main potential suppliers for Vietnam in long time This outcome has therefore, totally reflected accurately the fact of import flows among these countries thanks to tariff elimination under ACFTA and VJEPA However, the downward trend of import flows recently of Vietnam from ASEAN markets causes AFTA be reflected to have statistically negative sign of 1.910 percent Along with AFTA, AJCEP was also recorded at the same sign like AFTA with minus 1.109 percent in affecting the importing Vietnam iron and steel It uncovers that joining these FTA does not bring out improvement in the exports from ASEAN countries to Vietnam in iron and steel sector Only AKFTA, with the short time of establishment, in the model, does not have significance in importing equation It is the complicatedly fluctuation of importing flow from Korea to Vietnam over years accompanying with a short time of establishment of AKFTA that the effects does not be taken into account Hope that for the latter studies, with longer time of series data, it can be pointed out accurately the influences of AKFTA This outcome plays as a reflection only Conclusion This paper has been successful to demonstrate the different effects of FTAs on Vietnam Iron and steel trade flows Depend upon the RCA, export intensity and import intensity index, Vietnam are considered to have comparative disadvantage in iron and steel productivity The imports of Vietnam are strong with China, Japan and Korea while for ASEAN nations, the intensity levels are quite less When FTAs are implemented, several changes in trade flows of Vietnam iron and steel products are improved The import from China has increased sharply over the years after 2006 The export of Vietnam to Korea rises rapidly after 2010 AFTA are seen to have little impacts on trade flows of Vietnam when trends are complicated over years By quantizing statistics through export and import gravity models, the impacts level of AKFTA, AFTA and VJEPA are foreseen to force the export iron and steel products of Vietnam to the related member nations ACFTA and AJCEP not have any significant effects on stimulating the exporting iron and steel For importing, ACFTA is remarked to force the importing from China to Vietnam these years VJEPA is also the FTAs gaining significantly good impacts on forcing the importing from Japan AKFTA, AFTA and AJCEP have not uncovered the clear impact on Vietnam’s imports iron and steel Vietnam iron and steel industry should take advantages effectively of some FTAs which have positive effects on exporting, such as AKFTA and VJEPA 12 Despite that the research has gained major achievements, there are still some limitations in the research, which create premise for the later studies First, the more observations we have, the better the estimation quality is In the paper, however, data for variables in the research are just collected from 2001 to 2012 due to time and budget constraints The paper bypasses some typical variables of the gravity model, only concentrates on FTA membership and additional simple geographical variables like Distance, Borders, Land locked when examining the influences of them on trade flows Thus, to some extent, it does not fully reflect the effects of all factors on Vietnam iron and steel industry The author hope that in the latter studies, some other variables like FDI could be added into the equation to check it out the impact level of this typical variable on trading flows Besides, the models in the research have a backward looking characteristic It means they are set up to make statements for the previous and present status of Vietnam iron and steel trade flows The suggestion for the next period of the development of Vietnam iron and steel industry is not cultivated References Vietnamese HaBuBanks (2009), “Tổng quan ngành thép”, HaBu Bank Securities MPI (2013), “Đánh giá tổng thể Tình hình kinh tế-xã hội Việt Nam sau năm gia nhập Tổ chức thương mại Thế giới” Nguyễn Tiến Dũng (2011), “Tác động Khu vực Thương mại Tự ASEANHàn Quốc đến thương mại Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN, Kinh tế kinh doanh 27 (2011) 219-231 English Anderson, J (1979), A theoretical foundation of the gravity model” American Economic Review 69(1), 106-16 B.P SarathChandran (2010), Trade Complementary and similarity between India and ASEAN Countries in the context of the RTA Deardorff, A V (1995), Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassic Development Economic Group of the World Bank De Hoyos, R and Iacovone, L (2011), Economic Performance under NAFTA: A Firm-Level Analysis of the Trade-Productivity Linkages, Policy research working paper No.5661, the World Bank DilekSeymen and partner (May, 2012), R&D intensive goods Trade and competitiveness of Turkey in the European Union market DwiSusanto and partner (2007), Trade creation and Trade diversion in the North American Free Trade Agreement: The case of the Agricultural sector, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Gregory EmekaKwentua (2006), Trade creation and Trade diversion effects in the EU-South Africa free trade Agreements 13 Hoang Duc Than, Tran Van Hoe, Nguyen Minh Ngoc and Pham Chi Cuong (2002), Strengthening Government’s Policy and Direction for Renovating and Developing Steel Industry, Symposium on Industrial and Trade Policies of Vietnam in Integration Age, Japan International Cooperation Agency and National Economics University, Hanoi, 29-30 March Hoang Duc Than, Tran Van Hoe, Nguyen Minh Ngoc, Tran Thang Long and Nguyen Viet Cuong (2003), Improving Steel Distribution System in Vietnam, NEU-JICA Joint Research Project Kawabata and Nozomu (2001), The Current Vietnamese Steel Industry and Its Challenges Kiheung Kim (2002), The economic effects of forming Korea-Asean Free Trade Agreements: The case of IT Industry M.A.B Siddique (2007), Regionalism, Trade and Economic Development in the Asia-Pacific Region Ministry of Planning and Investment, Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and Japan International Cooperation Agency (MPI-JICA) (2001a), Study on the Economic Development Policy in The Transition toward a Market-Oriented Economy in The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (Phase 3) Final Report Vol General Commentary (Annex), Hanoi and Tokyo: MPI and JICA MPI-JICA (2001b), Study on the Economic Development Policy in the Transition toward a Market-Oriented Economy in the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (Phase 3) Final Report Vol Trade and Industry, Hanoi and Tokyo: MPI and JICA MPI-JICA (2001c), Study on the Economic Development Policy in the Transition toward a Market-Oriented Economy in the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (Phase 3) Final Report Vol 5, State-Owned Enterprise Reform and Private Sector Promotion, Hanoi and Tokyo: MPI and JICA Misa OKABE and Shujiro URATA (2013), The impact of AFTA on Intra-AFTA trade Nozomu Kawabata (2007), Iron and Steel Industry in Vietnam: A new phase and Policy Shift, Discussion Paper No.9, Vietnam Development Forum Pöyhönen, P (1963), A tentative model for the flows of trade between countries” Predictions from a gravity model, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Sohn Chan-Huyn (2001), A gravity model Analysis of Korea trade Patterns and the Effects of a Regional Trading Arrangement Suresh K G and NeerajAswal (2014), Determinants of India’s Manufactured Exports to South and North: A gravity Model Analysis, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Bol.4, No.1, 2014, pp.144-151 Susan F Stone and Bang Nam Jeon (2000), Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in the Asia- Pacific region: Complementarity, Distance and Regional Economic Integration Tinbergen, J (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy 14 URATA Shujiro and OBAKE Misa (2007), The impacts of free trade agreements on Trade flows: An Application of the gravity model approach Viner, Jacob, 1950, The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: New York VP Bank (2013), Vietnam Steel Industry report, VPBank Securities Yu Sheng, Hsiao Chink Tang and XinpengXu (2012), The impact of ACFTA on people’s Republic of China-ASEAN Trade: Estimates Based on an Extended Gravity Model for Component Trade 15 ... applying gravity model in a new scope which is the iron and steel trade flows of Vietnam under ASEAN+ 3. There has not been any study applying gravity model on Vietnam iron and steel trade flows Section... about the impacts of FTAs under ASEAN+ 3 on Vietnam Iron and Steel industry How is the current status of tariff reduction of Vietnam iron and steel industry under FTAs? Up to now, what is the trading... integration of Vietnam Iron and Steel Industry in ASEAN+ 3 in terms of the openness level of FTAs, competitive advantage of Vietnam iron and steel industry in the regional integration and the change of