mối quan hệ giữa quản trị công ty và hiệu quả hoạt động doanh nghiệp

Chuang Kit lwJ.n va kiin nghi HDQT bi hc_1n chS, tiSm An chi phi "an theo" HDQT va vftn dS d6ng thu?n cfing nhu kha nang diSu ph6i cong vi�c giam 6.2.3 M6i quan h� phi tuy�n Ban diu, ty 1� so hfru v6n cua HDQT tang tu 0%-22% d�n dSn hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty giam Sau d6, ty 1� so hfru v6n tiSp tl)c tang wgt muc 22%, hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty gia tang KSt qua cho thfty, m6i quan h� gifra ty 1� so hfru v6n cua HDQT vai hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty la m6i quan h� phi tuySn 6.2.4 Khong co m6i quan h� Trang dS tai nghien cuu nay, gia thuySt vs SlJ tac d9ng tich ClJC cua vien HDQT d9c l?p khong diSu hanh dSn hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty khong c6 ca so dS chftp nh?n cfing nhu bac bo N6i each khac, khong co m6i quan h� nao gifra vien HDQT d9c l?p khong diSu hanh vai hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty Ho·n nfra, nghien cuu v�n clma thS kSt lu?n m6i quan h� gifra vien HDQT d9c l?p khong diSu hanh vai hi�u qua cong ty SC ph\l thUQC VaO ca hQi tang tnrong CUa tung Cong ty �O Ngoai ra, m6i quan h� gifra trinh d9 h9c vftn cua HDQT, va sv hi�n di�n cua c6 dong Ian cong ty vai hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng doanh nghi�p cfing chua duqc tim thfty dS tai nghien cuu 6.2.5 M6i quan h� tuong tac D�c bi�t va chuyen sau han, dS tai nghien cuu da tim thfty m6i quan h� gifra ySu t6 tuang tac cua ca h9i tang tiuang dSn quySn kiem nhi�m, kinh nghi�m cua HDQT anh huong Ien hi�u qua hoc_1t �jng cong ty C\l thS: • ca h9i tang\nrang ciong vai tro diSu tiSt dSn quySn kiem nhi�m.va co anh huang dSn hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty d nhung cong ty co it ca h9i tang tnrcmg, quysn kiem nhi�m se lam giam hi�u qua hoc_1t d9ng cong ty Hay n6i each khac, cong 102 Jensen, M., C and Meckling, W., H (1976), "Theory of the Firm Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" Journal ofFinancial Economics 3(4), 305-360 Jensen, M., C and Murphy, K., J (1990), "Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives" Journal ofPolitical Economy, 98(2), 225-264 Klapper, L., F and Love, I (2004), "Corporate governance, investor protection and performance in emerging markets" Journal 0JC01porate Finance, 10(5); 703-728 Le, T., M (2008), "Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Vietnam" Bond Law Review, 20(2), 1-80 Li, H and A Qi, (2008), "Impact of corporate governance on voluntary disclosure in chiness listed companies" Corporate Ownership Control; 5(2), 360-366 Lin, C., Ma, Y and Su, D (2009), "Corporate Governance and Firm Efficiency: Evidence from China's Publicly Listed Firms" Managerial and Decision Economics, 30(3), 193-209 Lipton, M and Lorsch, J., W (1992), "A modest proposal for improved corporate governance" Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77 McColgan, P (2001), "Agency theory and corporate governance: A review of the literature from a UK perspective" Working paper, University of Strathclyde McConnell, J., J and Servaes, H (1990), "Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value" Journal ofFinance Economics, 27(2), 595-612 Morck, R., Shleifer, A and Vishny, R (1988), "Management Ownership and Market Valuation" Journal ofFinancial Economics, 20(1), 293-315 Myers, S (1996), "Outside equity financing" Working �per, Massachusetts Institute of · Technology Nakano, M: and Nguyen, P (2011), "Do older boards affect firm perform�nce: An empirical analysis ·• based on Japanese firms" Working Paper Nguyen, C., D (2008), "Corporate Governance in Vietnan: Regulations, Practices and Problems" Ha N(H: Vi�n nghien Cl.Ill quan ly kinh tJ trung uong O'Connell, V and Cramer, N (2010), "The Relationship Between Firm Performance and Board Characteristics in Ireland" European Management Journal, 28(5), 387-399 OECD (1999), "OECD Principles ofCorporate Governance" Paris: OECD Qu6c h