1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

Giải thích hệ số PBN - Modeling Appendix

20 345 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 20
Dung lượng 501,49 KB

Nội dung

BridgeTech, Inc. Modeling Appendix h h 1 h 2 l e1 l e2 l i /2 l i /2 l i i l t w t 1 2 t h s t w Centroid Axis of Box-Girder Exterior Longitudinal Girder Interior Longitudinal Girder h l e1 e2 l i l l e * Interior Longitudinal Girder Exterior Longitudinal Girder Closed Section For Torsional Rigidity BridgeTech, Inc. Shear Distribution Factors for CIP Concrete Multicell Box Beam Bridges -- Validation Ext Int Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior 1 L 0.620 0.344 0.618 0.338 0.29% 1.84% 2 L 0.644 0.876 0.644 0.889 0.06% 1.45% 3 L 0.654 0.900 0.653 0.915 0.25% 1.69% 1 L 0.618 0.346 0.620 0.336 0.34% 3.03% 2 L 0.637 0.885 0.640 0.891 0.51% 0.68% 3 L 0.645 0.904 0.649 0.913 0.57% 0.93% 1 L 0.643 0.317 0.639 0.310 0.63% 2.08% 2 L 0.669 0.861 0.664 0.815 0.80% 5.36% 3 L 0.679 0.885 0.672 0.877 1.00% 0.95% 1 L 0.635 0.318 0.547 0.289 13.84% 9.10% 2 L 0.667 0.854 0.606 0.759 9.06% 11.18% 3 L 0.679 0.883 0.629 0.817 7.37% 7.50% 1 L 0.722 0.264 0.718 0.257 0.43% 2.52% 2 L 0.774 0.955 0.780 0.948 0.70% 0.65% 3 L 0.779 1.022 0.784 1.033 0.67% 1.02% 1 L 0.706 0.267 0.698 0.261 1.17% 2.26% 2 L 0.767 0.941 0.769 0.930 0.15% 1.18% 3 L 0.776 1.016 0.778 1.022 0.24% 0.63% 1 L 0.652 0.317 0.658 0.314 0.88% 0.95% 2 L 0.675 0.914 0.681 0.936 0.83% 2.40% 1 L 0.642 0.319 0.645 0.335 0.43% 5.12% 2 L 0.671 0.908 0.675 0.983 0.62% 8.30% SAP2000 BTLiveLoader DifferenceBridge Type TTU Bridge No. BridgeID No. Span Lanes Loaded Beam End 1 2 10141013 2 1 14 1011 1012 2 13 15 Multicell Box Beam 1 2 12 1007 1008 10101009 1 BridgeTech, Inc. excellent ≥0.9 bad < 0.5 Lever Rule Henry's Method LRFD CHBDC STD Sanders Best Method 1 excellent good good bad bad bad Lever 2 or more excellent acceptable good bad bad bad Lever 1 excellent poor good good good good Lever 2 or more excellent excellent excellent good good good Lever 1 good good good bad bad bad Lever 2 or more good good good poor acceptable bad Lever 1 bad bad bad bad bad bad CHBDC 2 or more acceptable excellent acceptable acceptable acceptable poor Henry's 1 excellent good good poor poor poor Lever 2 or more excellent excellent excellent poor poor poor Lever 1 excellent poor excellent excellent good good Lever 2 or more good excellent good excellent good excellent Henry's 1 excellent excellent good poor poor poor Henry's 2 or more excellent excellent excellent poor poor poor Henry's 1 poor bad excellent acceptable poor poor LRFD 2 or more poor excellent excellent good good good Henry's 1 excellent acceptable excellent poor acceptable bad Lever 2 or more excellent excellent excellent acceptable acceptable poor Lever 1 excellent acceptable excellent acceptable good poor Lever 2 or more good excellent excellent good excellent poor Henry's 1 poor poor poor poor poor poor CHBDC 2 or more good excellent good poor acceptable poor Henry's 1 acceptable bad poor bad poor bad Lever 2 or more poor excellent poor bad poor bad Henry's 1 excellent poor excellent acceptable acceptable poor Lever 2 or more excellent excellent excellent good good acceptable Lever 1 excellent poor acceptable good excellent acceptable STD 2 or more excellent excellent excellent good excellent acceptable Henry's 1 poor bad bad poor bad bad CHBDC 2 or more acceptable good poor poor poor bad Henry's 1 bad excellent bad poor bad bad Henry's 2 or more poor good poor poor poor bad Henry's Method Rating Based on the Value of the Correlation Coefficient (R 2 ) between Each Simplified Method and Rigorous Analysis Lanes Loaded Girder Locations Action Bridge Set Method 0.90 > good ≥0.80 0.80 > acceptable ≥0.70 0.70 > poor ≥0.50 4 3 2 1 Moment Moment Shear Moment Shear Moment Shear Shear Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Slab On I CIP Tees Spread Boxes Adjacent Boxes vvcc vvcccvc vvcc BridgeTech, Inc. Basics Continued  Deflection is the easiest state variable to predict analytically/numerically  Interior girder load effects are easier to predict than exterior  Loads near midspan distribute more uniformly than load applied near supports.  Relative stiffness is primary and flexure is more important than is torsion  Most important parameter is the girder spacing (or cantilever span) 2 2 3 3 ( ) ( ) d w EI M x dx d w EI V x dx   BridgeTech, Inc. Prerequisites  We are not proposing to take any one simplified method “as is”. (unless it really works well).  Analytically-based approaches can be implemented at different levels (i.e., compute stiffness parameters) – empirical methods cannot.  Analytically-based approaches can be more easily extended (in case of limits of application), than empirically-based methods.  Analytically-based approaches can be as simple as empirical approaches BridgeTech, Inc. Task 1 -- Literature Review Michael Patritch Graduate Student TN Tech BridgeTech, Inc. Task 1 -- Literature Critical Findings Simplified methods  Sanders and Elleby  “Equal Distribution Method” – name is a misnomer  Canadian Standards  Juxtaposition of stiffness extremes Stiffness effects Testing Analysis and modeling BridgeTech, Inc. Sanders and Elleby  NCHRP study  Limitations  Span to 120-ft  Slab on Beam (Orthotropic Plate Theory)  Multi beam (Articulated Orthotropic Plate)  CIP Boxes (Folded Plate)  Considered  Aspect ratio  Relative long/trans flexural stiffness  Relative torsonal stiffness  Field tests for some validation BridgeTech, Inc. AASHTO LRFD  NCHRP 12-26  Empirically based  Includes stiffness parameters in equations  “Ugly” equations  Embedded multiple presence factors  No rational analytical basis  Resort to lever rule when empiricism fails  Works reasonably well for interior girders  Limitations are of concern BridgeTech, Inc. Sanders and Elleby (cont) 3For 10 5 3For 3 1 7 2 3 10 5 / 2                  C N D C CNN D DSg L LL DSwheelg /)(  Double for LFRD Design Lane [...]... including multi-cell box girders with sufficient diaphragms, Slab-on-girders Steel grid deck-on-girders Shear-connected beam bridges in which the interconnection of adjacent beams is such as to provide continuity of transverse flexural rigidity across the cross-section Box girder bridges in which the boxes are connected by only the deck slab and transverse diaphragms, if present Shear-connected beam... t  but C = K(W/L) Bridge Type Beam and slab (includes concrete slab bridge) Beam Type and Deck Material K Concrete deck: Noncomposite steel I-beams 3 0 Composite steel I-beams 4 8 Nonvoided concrete beams (prestressed or reinforced) 3 5 Separated concrete box-beams 1 8 Concrete slab bridge 0 6 BridgeTech, Inc Canadian Specification  Analytically based upon orthotropic plate theory  Very similar... slab and transverse diaphragms, if present Shear-connected beam bridges in which the interconnection of adjacent beams is such as not to provide continuity of transverse flexural rigidity across the cross-section Numerous wood systems … BridgeTech, Inc Canadian Specification (cont) M g avg n  Lane  M m  Ng M g Fm  g avg M S N Fm     Cf Ce  F  1  100   100    BridgeTech, Inc Canadian . Voided slab, including multi-cell box girders with sufficient diaphragms,  Slab-on-girders  Steel grid deck-on-girders  Shear-connected beam bridges in. application), than empirically-based methods.  Analytically-based approaches can be as simple as empirical approaches BridgeTech, Inc. Task 1 -- Literature Review

Ngày đăng: 29/09/2013, 11:20

w