Để phục vụ việc học Writing Task 2, mình sẽ chia sẻ cho các bạn thêm những bài mẫu tổng hợp Task 2 để tham khảo nhé Các bạn đều biết yêu cầu chung của Writing Task 2: + Viết một bài luận với độ dài tối thiểu là 250 chữ + Câu hỏi ở phần thi này sẽ thuộc nhiều lĩnh vực từ giáo dục, y tế, môi trường, cuộc sống...và những vấn đề đời thường khác mà nhiều người quan tâm Bố cục bài viết Task 2 Một bài viết luận sẽ có 4 phần cơ bản là Introduction: Mở bài Supporting Paragraph 1: Thân bài 1 Supporting Paragraph 2: Thân bài 2 Conclusion: Kết luận
The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest? SUGGESTED ESSAY There is no doubt that the internet has revolutionized communication and information-sharing in the same way that the telegraph and the television did before it However, societies have had to cope with unanticipated new problems, including crimes which traditional laws are powerless to prevent This essay will address some of the illegal acts enabled by the internet and propose solutions To begin with, the global scale of the internet means that national laws are no longer adequate to control what happens online Take restrictions on legal reporting, for example In some countries, the media is prohibited from revealing details of a defendant’s past in case this prejudices a fair trial However, such restrictions are no longer enforceable now that information may be freely published in other countries and accessed by all The only solution here, it seems, is to adopt global standards Since the internet traverses national borders, the flow of information can only be controlled if all nations agree on what can and cannot be shared Another problem concerns anonymity, as internet users can easily conceal their identity and even impersonate others Many crimes such as identity theft and child abuse result from the ease with which criminals can operate anonymously online Some have proposed a system of online identification, similar to a passport, which would allow all internet users to be verified and traced I believe this idea should be explored further, though there are clearly concerns about the security of those who use the internet to protest against oppressive regimes In conclusion, the only long-term solution to the problem of internet crime is greater international cooperation Since the problem is global is scale, the solution must also be global A new agency of the United Nations should be created to tackle the problems described here Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together To what extent you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another? In the past people normally write letters to friends who live in a remote place, which is expensive and time-consuming With the advent of Internet, the world appears smaller than before because Internet makes communication easier I utterly agree that the Internet provides a cheap and time saving means for people to communicate with each other First of all, Internet charges less than other means of communication A call or message costs consumers merely a few cents; whereas, a letter normally requires several dollars for envelop and stamp Communication via Internet is so costless that a majority of people who have effortless access to it mainly use phone calls, short messages and e-mails to communicate with others This is not the only advantage of utilizing Internet for communication Besides, another advantage of communication via Internet is time saving A phone call can reach the contact instantly If the contact is not available at the moment, a short message notifies him at the earliest convenience In addition, e-mail is becoming a formal way to contact people, replacing the custom of sending a letter because of its advantage of time saving Generally, a letter takes around one week to reach the receiver; however, an e-mail arrives at the receiver's mailbox instantly after a click of send button Thus, Internet makes communication with other people easier the before To summarize, the advantages of cheap prize and time saving make Internet an easier way to communicate People nowadays rely on Internet to communicate in almost every occasion In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to almost anything they like To what extent should children have to follow rules? Currently, one of the most considerable issues in every society is rule in children`s behaviors It is a wellknown fact that children`s behaviours also change due to their family in which they are born Opinions are divided as to whether strict rules should apply children or not, but it is my firm conviction that mentioned rules may make them shy or embarrassing while make some future plans or determine decisions because of some important reasons First of all, strict rules are not necessary for children on their early age because if we not let our kids some kind of harmful behaviours they will never understand why it is dangerous For instance, if kid of four wants to put heavy water glass, and we not let it, that child can never recognize heavy of glass On the other hand, this kind of rules also leads to children to reject their some responsibilities as to their works themselves It means, when they want to something, and if they fails to it at the first time, they always try to get help from others not themselves It should also be noted that, strict rules make children shy Because of the fact that children who under the pressure always embarrass to try new skills and it leads them to their skills in secret which may be cause for much more sufficient problems That`s why these rules should not use on children`s nurtures Taking everything into account, it is my foregone conclusion that children behavior should not be followed strict rules The Internet when used as a source of information, has more drawbacks than advantages To what extent you agree with this statement? The internet has transformed people’s lives It has changed the way we communicate with each other, transact business and access information Although the internet has both positive and negative aspects, I believe that its merits outweigh its demerits To begin with, thanks to the internet, people can now contact their friends, family and colleagues faster and more efficiently than in the past Most people have internet connection on their mobile or computer and as a result, they can always stay connected with their near and dear ones For example, social networking applications like WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter allow people to chat and share videos and other important information Similarly, through facilities like video conferencing and webinars people from different parts of the world can now participate in online conferences which eliminate the need to travel to other countries and cities for attending such programmes Additionally, online shopping and banking have saved people a great deal of time and effort People today can sit at home and buy their grocery, books or household appliances from online sites such as Amazon or eBay and their stuff will be delivered at home Moreover, transferring and withdrawing money have become very easy today with online facilities offered by most banks On the other hand, a great deal of offensive and obscene content is available on the web and children have easy access to them Many antisocial elements and terrorist groups like ISIS recruit youngsters through the internet Internet addiction is another problem Many people are now addicted to the internet and wasting their time This can affect their career and relationships In conclusion, the internet has greatly benefited people in different ways Although it has some negative aspects it can be handled efficiently by implementing proper laws and regulations and through parental supervision Some people say that schools should teach good behaviour to children and introduce them to ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ Parents should not be the only ones responsible Do you agree or disagree? According to some people, schools also have a responsibility to teach good values and behaviour to children I completely agree with this Children spend a great deal of their time at school It is, therefore, the duty of teachers to inculcate good habits and behaviour in them Most children now start going to school as soon as they turn three The school is like a second home to them and there they get to spend time with lots of others At this age, children have an impressionable mind and anything that they see and hear leave an indelible mark of their mind Needless to say, teachers can use this period to help them distinguish right from wrong Young children have tremendous respect for their teachers In fact, they respect their teachers more than they respect their parents So, naturally, they will show a greater inclination to walk the right path if teachers show them what is right and what is wrong Parents are also responsible for teaching good values to their children However, they cannot monitor every act of their children When the kids are at school, teachers are their natural guardians and as such it is the duty of the teachers to teach them what is good and what is bad A child’s character is formed by the time he or she turns 10 Parents and teachers are the major influences on their life during this period It is therefore imperative that both parents and teachers take the responsibility to teach them good behaviour To conclude, children spend a great deal of time under the care and supervision of their teachers and therefore, teachers have a moral duty to guide them to the right path Many parents are unhappy because of the increasing amount of violence in their children by computer games, TV programs, and other leisure activities What are the harmful effects of such violent programs on children? What are the solutions for this problem? Nowadays, many parents are concerned about their children’s violent behavior because of the increase in the portrayal of violence in various entertainment programs These violent programs have many harmful effects This essay will elaborate more on the harmful effects and suggest possible solutions to mitigate these effects To begin with, aggressive behavior in children is one of the side effects of watching violent programs Children often imitate what they see on television When they are exposed to violence via TV programs, they start believing that aggression is the best solution for every problem, and they start adopting these unwanted behaviors in their daily life For example, studies have conclusively shown that children who watch a lot of violent content show high levels of aggression Another effect of watching violent content is that they become fearless Movies always have a hero who has the power to anything Teenagers often get influenced by reel heroes They also get into the habit of abusing weak children Cases of bullying in schools are increasing There are possible solutions to handle these effects Firstly, parental control can play a major role Parents must become more vigilant and closely monitor the activities of their children They also need to educate their young ones that violence is not good for the society and take corrective measures when they see such kind of behavior in their children Parental lock on TV channels can help parents to limit what their children see on television Another possible solution is by involving children in community services Social services like helping elderly people help children to become docile and develop empathy for weaker sections of the society To conclude, watching violent content leads to dangerous effect on children such as aggression and fearlessness These behaviors can be tackled with effective coaching and proper vigilance from parents and by involving children in community services The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent you agree or disagree In recent times, media has been in the limelight and has aroused the wide concern for the pernicious effects associated with it Some people are of the fervent conviction that focusing on negative and urgent issues is detrimental to the society From my perspective, I partially agree this view There are several reasons why media coverage related to problems and urgent issues is proven to bring enormous benefits for both the social and citizens Firstly, it is responsibility of the mass media to cover negative issues such as the natural disaster, which allows people to protect them from the potential financial loss and physical injury To take a concrete example, new reports from the television programs covering the information about tsunami and earthquake of the central of Vietnam set the pivotal platform for warning the government and inhabitants Secondly, the environmental pollution topics from the mass media is of great necessity for protecting the environment Indeed, it not only raises the public’s awareness of protecting habitant but also catch the government’s attention to this phenomenon However, the excessive reports on problems negatively influence the behavior of people, as well as the journalist’s conduct It is obvious that when people are exposed to too much news about crimes or accidents, they will lose the sense of security As a result, they become over-cautious and suspicious of the others which lead to have difficulties to build interpersonal relationship Moreover, it encourages journalists to create bad stories and deliver the exaggerated news Indeed, some people believe that the dramatic and exciting news is easy to draw the public’s attention, they tend to write their articles with the emphasis of negative parts of the stories so that their newspapers will sell well Therefore, it will result in face news and unreal stories In conclusion, although the bad news create the felling of anxiety and uncomfortable to a large number of audiences, they are unavoidable in current information The government and the citizens can learn to solve the problems You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence Model Answer : Some students are thinking of giving up studying English as modern machines can the job of translation However, I think it is wrong to drop studying English, as machines cannot perfectly, especially in translation, which is a sophisticated process and needs so many skills Firstly, what machines can now is translate word for word, without consideration of context When a computer translates scientific works, they can a satisfying job But when it comes to literature works, they cannot weigh every word according to different situations, and thus their job cannot display the path of original works Suppose we give a poem by Shakespeare for translation, we can imagine how ridiculous the translation would be Secondly, machines cannot convey the manner of speakers If the speaker says in different tones like surprisingly, sarcastically or delightedly, the machine will not be able to express the emotions of people; therefore, we have no idea of what speakers really mean When there is face-to-face communication, we can understand people judging from their expressions, body gestures and so on, even if we not use many words But machines cannot this On the other hand, English study offers one a new and different perspective of English-speaking countries because language and culture are closely related to each other Machines can never this When we study English, we not only learn the language but also know more about the culture, history and customs Machines can never replace the process of English study and give us a better understanding of the cultural background To sum up, translation machines help us in some way but it doesn't mean that we can quit studying English because English study can give us much more than the English language itself It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books" Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words Model Answer 1: Books are our best companions and source of knowledge from our infant time till the end of life Our learning begins by reading books Books open new horizons in front of us But sometimes the hardest and most important lessons we learn in life come from our participation in different situations The things we learn in real-life can never be learned through anything else We can't learn everything from books and in my opinion, the knowledge we gather from our experience is far more important, than anything else Of course, learning from books in a formal educational institution and learning from books for someone's own interest are highly important Books are like open doors Whenever someone read books, it helps the readers to broaden their power of imagination, to introduce them new ideas In facts, books are a fine collection of ideas, experiences, imaginations and innovations of writers for the readers But everyone's life is quite different than others So, we sometimes face a whole new situation I believe, most important lessons cannot be taught It must be faced and learned all by ourselves The experiences we gather from our daily life help us to rectify our future act We learn from watching a situation even if we are not the part of it We even learn from the stories we hear from our friends or family members about some strange situations that have occurred No one can teach us how to live alone, how to share our feelings, how to create self-respects Those all must be learned from our experiences Experiencing our own triumphs and disasters is really the only way to learn how to deal with life Books, teachers, parents give us guidelines and our experiences give the perfection of it A lot of people believe that the amount of violence shown on youtube affects the actions of our young people and therefore increases the amount of violence in our society today Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be done to reduce violence in our society today? You should write at least 250 words Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence Model Answer: The question of whether the amount of violence on the internet has affected young people in our society is something which cannot be quantified or proved My opinion is though that the answer is “yes, it has” The internet today show a large amount of violence and, although we try and shield our young people from seeing too much, they still get to watch it At the age of eighteen in my country, they can see everything anyway Violence on the streets has increased That has been proved The connection between internet obsession with violence and today's street violence cannot be proved but it is logical that the two are connected Young people imitate what they see and it is logical that they see glamour in what they when they commit violence How can we lessen violence? Reducing the amount of violence on the internet would certainly be a good start Being more vigilant about what age children are when they see violence in these media, and raising the age limits would also help Another good idea would be to channel the violence of young people I don‛t think that national service should be re-established in this country but, if people are convicted of violence and sent to prison, then why not give them the option of serving in the army Their violence will be controlled and they will be subjected to discipline so that they will be better able to control themselves when they leave Thus I agree with the statement that the internet affects the young people in our society There are some things that can be done to better the situation but I doubt whether anything will be done Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer Model Answer 1: Humankind, through the ages, has undergone many changes from the time when people communicated only face-to-face to nowadays when a person has in use many types of communication means Some people still prefer to use face-to-face communication despite many other sometimes more convenient ones such as phone, mail, e-mail and fax I think to continue this essay it is essential to clarify what kind of conversation we are talking about For example, if people are negotiating it is very important to have a face-to-face communication It is very important to see during a negotiation how one's opponent is moving, is he nervous or relaxed, what he is doing, etc Scientists say that the body language and facial gestures can say many things about a person, his strong and weak sides, his traits, manners and even habits To know what kind of man one is dealing with is an essential aspect in negotiation Many managers prefer to have face-to-face conversations with the future employees So, in this case, they see how a person behaves From the other side, if I need to notify my bank that I am going to close an account I not want to spend my time driving there, waiting for my turn and talking with a representative It is easier for me just to call or e-mail them It saves my time and my bank's too To summarise, from my opinion all important issues better be discussed in face-to-face conversation It will eliminate many further misunderstandings and bring only benefits to both sides Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids Many people think that the punishment is necessary to help children learn the distinction To what extent you agree to punish a kid to teach him/ her something important? What kind of punishment you think parents and teachers can use? You should write at least 250 words Sample Answer 1: Parenting is a very difficult challenge all around the world Most of the parents consider punishment a better teaching method instead of listening and communicating with the children However, to my mind, anything excess is bad It I not deniable that the punishment is one of the easiest ways to teach children good or bad but it should not be the only way of teaching To start with, children are very sensitive, want love and care They need their parents’ support and encouragement in every aspect of their life So, it is considered by most of the psychologists that by giving harsh punishments too often parents are making their children prone to violence Hence, it is now proven by social researchers that children learn less from punishments, becomes shy and insecure and it may affect their social behaviour However, it is deniable that children are naturally advantageous and curious about everything Some are stubborn and need to deal differently For such children, parents and teachers should adopt a strict but notorture behaviour It could include numerous methods such as scolding, taking their favourite belonging for a couple of days or limiting their leisure time In addition, cancelling their pocket money for a month or cancel a weekend outing plan could be a better option rather than locking them alone in a dark room In conclusion, I surely believe that minor punishments could teach children the difference between right and wrong, however, the consequences could be different for every individual child I suggest that there should be a proper and balanced communication of parents and teachers with the children