Báo cáo KLTN sự ảnh hưởng của phân bón đến canh tác cây Ngưu Tất ( bản Tiếng Anh ) Do Phương Xuân Cảnh HVNNVN soạn thảo , được đánh giá cao . Bài luận cho thấy sự ảnh hưởng của N , P, K đối với sự sinh trưởng và phát triển của Ngưu Tất ( loại cây thuốc quý đang được quan tâm )
DECLARATION I hereby declare that this paper is my own work All results and data in this title are absolutely honest and have not been submitted before to any institution for assessment purposes All sources used in this paper were cited in references Hanoi, 05/02/ 2018 Student Phuong Xuan Canh i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT To complete this thesis, I am deeply indebted to people who have been providing me with precious support and advice Firstly, I would like to send my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Nguyen Hanh Hoa and Dr Phung Thi Thu Ha, Department of Botany, Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, for their enthusiastic support, helpful advice and considerable encouragement in the completion of my thesis I would also like to express sincere thanks to the lectures from the Faculty of Agronomy in general and lectures in the Department of Botany in particular, who taught and created better conditions for students during the learning process and research Besides, my special thanks go to M.Sc Nguyen Thi Binh and staffs from the Research Center for Medicinal Plants for their technical guidance in the field Last but not least, I want to express my sincere thanks to my family and intimate friends who have always been by my side, give me support and strength to complete this graduation thesis ii CONTENTS DECLARATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii CONTENTS .iii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES vi Part II LITERATURE REVIEW PART III MATERIALS AND METHODS .14 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 Effect of N on growth duration of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.2 Effect of N doses on increasing number of primary and secondary branches of Achyranthes bidentata Blume .Error: Reference source not found Table 4.3 Effect of N doses on increasing Achyranthes bidentata Blume’s heightError: Reference source not found Table 4.4 Effect of N doses on increasing canopy diameter of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.5 Effect of N doses on dry matter accumulation of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.6 Effect of P doses on growth duration of Achyranthes bidentata Blume.Error: Reference source not found Table 4.7 Effect of P doses on increasing number of primary and secondary branches of Achyranthes bidentata Blume .Error: Reference source not found Table 4.8 Effect of P doses on increasing Achyranthes bidentata Blume’s height Error: Reference source not found Table 4.9: Effect of P doses on increasing canopy diameter of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.10 Effect of P doses on dry matter accumulation of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.11 Effect of K doses on growth duration of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.12 Effect of K doses on increasing number of primary and secondary branches of Achyranthes bidentata Blume .Error: Reference source not found Table 4.13 Effect of K doses on increaing Achyranthes bidentata Blume’s heightError: Reference source not found Table 4.14 Effect of K doses on increasing canopy diameter of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found Table 4.15 Effect of K doses on dry matter accumulation of Achyranthes bidentata Blume Error: Reference source not found iv v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1: Effect of N doses on increasing Achyranthes bidentata Blume’s height Error: Reference source not found DECLARATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii CONTENTS .iii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES vi Part II LITERATURE REVIEW PART III MATERIALS AND METHODS .14 vi PART I INTRODUCTION 1.1.Background Fertilizing is one of the most commonly technical measures is applied and often make high efficiency, but it also gets a relatively high rate of agricultural production costs [4] Reasonable fertilizing is using the appropriate amounts of fertilizer for crop to ensure increasing the productivity of crops with the highest economic efficiency without negative consequences on agricultural products and ecological environment Reasonable fertilizing increases fertilizer using efficiency , instead of the current fertilizer using coefficient is 40-50%, reasonable fertilizing can increase that coefficient to 60-70% and higher Balanced fertilizing effect positive on improving soil fertility; increase crop yields; improve the efficiency of fertilizer and other technical cultivation measures; increased quality of agricultural products; protect to ecological environment [2] However, each crop needs a different nutrition, so identify right nutrition requirements for plants not only improves fertilizer using efficiency, but it’s also an important basis for promoting efficiency of other technical measures (tillage, variety, planting density, irrigation and plant protection), help us to manage the quality of medicinal plants, improve crop yields Among the imported medicinal plants, Achyranthes bidentata Blume is a valuable medicinal plant as well as an important means for take care of community health A.bidentata tuber is a great remedy and found in most traditional medicine remedies A.bidentata is bitter, calculus and not toxic A.bidentata is used to treat back pain, bone fatigue, menstrual bleeding, menstrual irregularities, hypertension [6] [12] In additional, A bidentata roots also contains other compounds such as saponin, echysteron, nokoteron, potassium to have many various effectings [17] A.bidentata is present in hundreds of different Traditional Chinese medicine remedies and prepared into widely marketed forms such as Bidentin for treating hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, Dentonin for treating gingivitis and inflammation around the teeth [8] In Vietnam, since the 1960s A.bidentata has studied and successfully imported from China and launched to production However, new research for developing technical measures to increase productivity, not to focus on crop nutrition research Today, with the development of sciences and technologys, human requirements are rising Products made and circulated in the market must not only achieve high productivity but also good quality Many concepts of clean medicinal herbs, safe medicinal herbs and high quality medicinal herbs with many strict requirements such as allowable maximum nitrate, harmful microorganisms, pesticide residues and quality of medicinal herbs with pharmacopoeial standards From that real situation, we perform the title: " Effect of N, P, K doses on growth of Achyranthes bidentata Blume in autumn – winter 2017 in Hanoi " 1.2 Objective and requirement 1.2.1 Objective Determine N, P, K doses that have the greatest effect on the growth of A.bidentata during the experimental period 1.2.2 Requirement − Learn about botanical characteristics (roots, stems, leaves, flowers), ecological conditions and distribution, chemical components, pharmacological effects as well as planting A.bidentata and pests and diseases management − Measure and collect accurately and periodically data relate to the growth and develoment of A.bidentata, thereby we can see the effects of macronutrients on the growth and development A.bidentata − Keep a careful record of practical diary, set up accurately experiments and assessments objectively PART II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Classification and botanical characteristics of Achyranthes bidentata Blume 2.1.1 Classification According to USDA PLANTS Classification Report [36], Achyranthes bidentata Blume will be classified: Kingdom: Plantae – Plants Division: Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants Class: Magnoliopsida – Dicotyledons Subclass: Caryophyllidae Order: Caryophyllales Family: Amaranthaceae – Amaranth family Genus: Achyranthes L – chaff flower Species: Achyranthes bidentata Blume 2.1.2 Botanical characteristics Achyranthes bidentata Blume is perennial herbaceous plant, 60-80 cm high Tuberous roots long, cylindrical with many big lateral roots Stems angular, swollen at the nodes, green or purple color Branching in the vertical direction Leaves opposite, elliptic to linear-lanceolate, 5-10cm in length, 1-4cm in width, sharp tip, with margins undulate, petiole 1-1.5cm long Inflorescence in terminal spike, 2-5cm long, deflected against the rachis, bracts 3mm long, sepals, fuse-staments, anthers like bird’s eyes shape, ovate ovary Fruit is oval shape, has seed [3] In China, there are two species Achyranthes bidentata Blume and Achyranthes aspera L A.bidentata is mainly grown in Ha Nam province, it has no trichomes, stem and leaves are purple, spike inflorescence, the root is long and light yellow Achyranthes aspera L grow mainly in Tu Xuyen province, it has many gray trichomes, and leaves are white, spike inflorescense, big, browngray main root [8] 2.1.3 Original, ecological condition and distribution of Achyranthes bidentata Blume It’s got this name because the cylindrical Achyranthes have angular stem and enlarged node that looks like a bull’s knee, plus the healing power of this herb is just like the power of a bull [13] Achyranthes bidentata Blume origin in China or Japan It has been domesticated and has a long history of cultivation and application in those countries In China, it’s grown many in Ha Nam, Tu Xuyen, Long An, Ho Bac and Thiem Tay [14] A.bidentata is imported from China to Vietnam in 1960 At first, it was grown for domestication in Sa Pa, after that moved to Sin Ho (Lai Chau) and then to Tam Dao (Vinh Phuc) and Van Dien (Hanoi) 30 years ago, A bidentata was grown as the medicinal sources in the suburbs of Hanoi and other provinces in the Northern Delta It’s can be considered as a typical example of a medicinal plant of temperate zone, through the research process it’s can be successfully grown in the deltas with tropical monsoon climate This indicates that the A.bidentata is relatively broad ecosystem, although the growing season is mainly in the low temperature period of the year A.bidentata is easy to grow and not require a strict climate Generally, it can grow at temperate, light-filled areas The appropriate temperature for growth and development is 18 – 26oC At low temperature – 10oC, seeds can not germinate, plants grow slowly Moisture-sensitive, suitable for sandy soil, not suitable for heavy loam soil The pH 5-6 is suitable for growth and development of plants It can be resistant to drought but can not resistant to flood If soaked - 10 hours, the plant will be died A.bidentata has short growing time from 120 to 130 days after sowing, harvest the medicine and 80 - 90 days after planting, collect seed [8] 2.3 Chemical components and benefits of Achyranthes bidentata Blume 2.3.1 Chemical components of Achyranthes bidentata Blume In Achyranthes bidentata Blume roots, a saponin is extracted that’s hydrolyzed into oleanolic acid C30H48O3, galactose, rhamnoza, glucose, ecdysteron, inokosterone and potassium [13] DATA ANALYSIS APPENDIX BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKT FILE CTN LAN1 13/ 1/18 9:15 :PAGE VARIATE V004 DKT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 10.7577 1.79294 0.17 0.978 NL 455.519 227.760 21.94 0.000 * RESIDUAL 12 124.567 10.3806 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 590.844 29.5422 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SLT FILE CTN LAN1 13/ 1/18 9:15 :PAGE VARIATE V005 SLT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 176085 293474E-01 0.49 0.802 NL 946455 473227 * RESIDUAL 12 712804 7.97 0.006 594004E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 1.83534 917672E-01 9.938 1.89 0.163 NL 472.530 * RESIDUAL 236.265 12 1521.00 1.86 0.196 126.750 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 3433.16 171.658 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SLT FILE CTP LAN5 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V005 SLT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 28.7018 4.78363 NL 128677 643385E-01 0.05 0.954 * RESIDUAL 12 16.4995 3.48 0.032 1.37496 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 45.3300 2.26650 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC1 FILE CTP LAN5 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE 59 VARIATE V006 CC1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 518095 NL 660317E-01 330158E-01 0.55 0.594 * RESIDUAL 863492E-01 1.45 0.275 12 716191 596826E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 1.30032 650159E-01 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC2 FILE CTP LAN5 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V007 CC2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 0.000000 0.000000 0.00 1.000 NL 0.000000 0.000000 0.00 1.000 * RESIDUAL 12 0.000000 0.000000 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 0.000000 0.000000 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE CTP LAN5 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 222.311 196.578 17.6889 4.22222 249.911 210.867 16.9778 4.00000 3 302.733 231.644 18.2222 4.08889 317.556 238.333 18.0000 4.17778 324.800 234.778 18.9778 4.34444 320.733 245.067 18.0889 4.31111 319.111 244.622 20.9333 4.48889 SE(N= 3) 9.76284 5%LSD 12DF CT NOS 30.0826 6.50001 0.676992 20.0287 2.08604 0.141047 0.434613 CC2 0.000000 0.000000 3 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 60 SE(N= 3) 0.000000 5%LSD 12DF 0.000000 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 274.933 231.048 18.3238 4.11429 283.829 238.210 18.4000 4.24762 278.305 242.552 18.5143 4.20952 SE(N= 7) 6.39128 5%LSD 12DF NL 4.25525 19.6937 NOS 0.443196 13.1119 0.923368E-01 1.36564 0.284521 CC2 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 SE(N= 7) 0.000000 5%LSD 12DF 0.000000 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE CTP LAN5 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 21) SD/MEAN | | NO BASED ON BASED ON % | OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | 21 279.02 18.307 16.910 6.1 0.1940 0.6267 DKT 21 237.27 13.102 11.258 4.7 0.1630 0.1962 21 18.413 1.5055 1.1726 CC1 21 4.1905 0.25498 0.24430 CC2 21 0.00000 0.00000 | | CCC SLT |NL | 6.4 0.0315 0.9545 5.8 0.2753 0.5935 0.00000 0.0 1.0000 1.0000 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCC FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE VARIATE V003 CCC LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 999.451 166.575 0.63 0.707 NL 979.598 489.799 1.85 0.199 61 * RESIDUAL 12 3182.70 265.225 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 5161.74 258.087 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKT FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE VARIATE V004 DKT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 1693.71 282.284 2.91 0.055 NL 86.9366 43.4683 0.45 0.654 * RESIDUAL 12 1165.46 97.1220 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 2946.11 147.305 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SLT FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE VARIATE V005 SLT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 15.4362 2.57270 1.53 0.248 NL 6.00889 3.00444 1.79 0.208 * RESIDUAL 12 20.1244 1.67704 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 41.5695 2.07848 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC1 FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE VARIATE V006 CC1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 1.24275 207125 0.72 0.641 NL 387725 193863 0.68 0.531 * RESIDUAL 12 3.44042 286702 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 5.07090 253545 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC2 FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE VARIATE V007 CC2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN F RATIO PROB ER LN 62 ============================================================================= CT 0.000000 0.000000 0.00 1.000 NL 0.000000 0.000000 0.00 1.000 * RESIDUAL 12 0.000000 0.000000 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 0.000000 0.000000 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 257.067 239.422 27.1556 6.93333 300.800 251.556 29.3778 6.87778 3 363.089 284.444 27.3333 6.88889 425.222 291.689 27.5111 7.36667 432.333 298.600 26.7556 7.27778 410.022 292.622 27.9556 7.08889 415.067 288.222 28.7111 7.04444 SE(N= 3) 9.40256 5%LSD 12DF CT NOS 28.9725 0.747671 17.5323 0.309140 2.30383 0.952564 CC2 0.000000 0.000000 3 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 SE(N= 3) 5.68982 0.000000 5%LSD 12DF 0.000000 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 390.714 261.352 27.3333 405.590 263.695 28.5714 7.18095 391.524 266.333 27.5810 6.95238 SE(N= 7) 6.15542 5%LSD 12DF NL NOS 18.9669 3.72486 6.85714 0.489466 11.4776 1.50821 0.202379 0.623600 CC2 63 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 SE(N= 7) 0.000000 5%LSD 12DF 0.000000 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE CTP LAN6 13/ 1/18 13:33 :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 21) SD/MEAN | | NO BASED ON BASED ON % | OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | 21 395.94 16.065 16.286 4.1 0.7069 0.1989 DKT 21 263.79 12.137 9.8551 3.7 0.0547 0.6538 21 27.829 1.4417 1.2950 CC1 21 6.9968 0.50353 0.53545 CC2 21 0.00000 0.00000 | | | CCC SLT |NL 4.7 0.2481 0.2076 7.7 0.6410 0.5309 0.00000 0.0 1.0000 1.0000 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCC FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V003 CCC LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 5038.13 839.689 2.11 0.127 NL 519.318 259.659 0.65 0.542 * RESIDUAL 12 4768.95 397.413 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 10326.4 516.320 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKT FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V004 DKT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 1494.70 249.117 4.23 0.016 NL 465.100 232.550 3.95 0.048 * RESIDUAL 12 707.066 58.9222 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 2666.87 133.343 64 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SLT FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V005 SLT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 8.02031 1.33672 0.86 0.552 NL 39.0620 19.5310 12.54 0.001 * RESIDUAL 12 18.6921 1.55767 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 65.7744 3.28872 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC1 FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V006 CC1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 1.48995 248324 1.18 0.380 NL 4.57820 2.28910 10.84 0.002 * RESIDUAL 12 2.53291 211076 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 8.60106 430053 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC2 FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE VARIATE V007 CC2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 395021 NL 935554E-02 467777E-02 0.19 0.832 * RESIDUAL 658368E-01 2.65 0.071 12 298052 248377E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 702428 351214E-01 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 311.444 293.067 36.0000 8.26667 366.511 311.511 36.2667 8.05556 3 481.044 351.567 37.1556 9.37778 65 500.400 384.978 35.5111 9.58889 524.289 392.689 36.3556 8.95556 522.600 391.622 37.0667 8.75556 519.156 371.311 37.2889 8.57778 SE(N= 3) 11.5096 5%LSD 12DF CT 4.43179 35.4650 NOS 0.265252 2.22033 0.817332 CC2 4.40333 4.05444 3 5.56778 5.78889 4.99222 4.65667 4.70333 SE(N= 3) 0.720572 13.6558 0.909902E-01 5%LSD 12DF 0.280372 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS CCC DKT SLT CC1 431.067 312.848 38.4190 9.23810 433.648 302.276 35.2762 8.09524 422.048 303.581 35.8667 8.62857 SE(N= 7) 7.53480 5%LSD 12DF NL NOS 4.53000 4.48048 4.51810 5%LSD 12DF 0.471725 8.93984 0.173648 1.45355 0.535069 CC2 SE(N= 7) 2.90128 23.2173 0.595671E-01 0.183546 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE CTP LAN7 13/ 1/18 9: :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 21) SD/MEAN | NO BASED ON BASED ON % | OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |NL | | | | 66 CCC 21 428.92 22.723 19.935 4.6 0.1270 0.5419 DKT 21 306.23 11.547 7.6761 2.5 0.0164 0.0475 SLT 21 36.521 1.8135 1.2481 CC1 21 8.6540 0.65578 0.45943 5.3 0.3803 0.0021 CC2 21 4.5095 0.18741 0.15760 3.5 0.0710 0.8317 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 3.4 0.5519 0.0012 CCC FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE VARIATE V003 CCC LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 22.0431 3.67386 0.75 0.620 NL 16.3109 8.15543 1.67 0.228 * RESIDUAL 12 58.5228 4.87690 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 96.8768 4.84384 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKT FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE VARIATE V004 DKT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 27.9306 4.65510 2.62 0.073 NL 4.34140 2.17070 1.22 0.330 * RESIDUAL 12 21.3165 1.77637 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 53.5885 2.67942 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC1 FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE VARIATE V005 CC1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 1.85736 309559 0.91 0.520 NL 449947 224974 0.66 0.538 * RESIDUAL 12 4.08042 340035 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 6.38773 319386 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CC2 FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE VARIATE V006 CC2 67 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 7.77905 1.29651 2.10 0.129 NL 458412 229206 0.37 0.702 * RESIDUAL 12 7.41714 618095 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 15.6546 782730 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CC1 CC2 CT NOS 40.5311 30.2568 9.13333 8.4667 50.0178 36.0489 9.93333 9.7333 3 61.2178 40.9078 10.91111 62.7444 41.5116 13.0444 64.8556 42.1691 11.83333 10.9111 63.6556 41.0160 10.46667 9.8333 63.8889 40.3312 10.43333 9.6444 SE(N= 3) CCC DKT 1.27500 5%LSD 12DF 0.769497 3.92872 10.16667 11.9111 0.336668 2.37108 0.453907 1.03739 1.39864 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS CCC DKT CC1 CC2 10.9048 70.7714 70.7810 55.3832 9.56190 11.1524 68.9067 55.3221 9.88571 10.8000 SE(N= 7) 54.3896 9.59048 0.834685 5%LSD 12DF 2.57195 0.503754 1.55224 0.220401 0.297152 0.679130 0.915627 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE CTP LAN8 30/ 1/18 20:48 :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 21) SD/MEAN | CCC NO BASED ON BASED ON OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS 21 70.153 2.2009 | % | | | | | 3.1 0.6200 0.2280 2.4 0.0733 0.3296 21 55.032 1.6369 1.3328 CC1 21 9.6794 0.56514 0.58313 | | 2.2084 DKT |NL | 6.0 0.5200 0.5379 68 CC2 21 10.952 0.88472 0.78619 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 7.2 0.1292 0.7017 DM FILE K1 16/ 1/18 19:59 :PAGE VARIATE V003 DM LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 220.734 36.7889 0.90 0.514 NL 165.433 55.1443 1.36 0.288 * RESIDUAL 18 732.145 40.6747 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 27 1118.31 41.4190 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE K1 16/ 1/18 19:59 :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS DM 9.9984 11.4341 11.3010 4 12.4619 13.0311 13.1546 13.0905 SE(N= 4) 3.18884 5%LSD 18DF 9.47450 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS DM 17.3632 24.1329 19.7403 20.1759 SE(N= 7) 5%LSD 18DF 2.41053 7.16205 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE K1 16/ 1/18 19:59 :PAGE 69 F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 28) SD/MEAN | | NO BASED ON BASED ON % | OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS | DM 28 20.353 6.4358 6.3777 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE |NL | | | | | | 31.3 0.5141 0.2878 DM FILE P2 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE VARIATE V003 DM LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 14.1136 2.35227 1.52 0.229 NL 43.6240 14.5413 9.37 0.001 * RESIDUAL 18 27.9440 1.55244 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 27 85.6816 3.17339 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE P2 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS DM 11.0176 12.1495 12.0562 4 13.8242 14.1737 14.0612 14.0725 SE(N= 4) 0.622986 5%LSD 18DF 1.85098 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS DM 12.0045 12.4333 14.3291 14.9787 70 SE(N= 7) 0.470933 5%LSD 18DF 1.39921 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE P2 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 28) SD/MEAN | | NO BASED ON BASED ON % | OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS | DM 28 13.436 1.7814 1.2460 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE |NL | | | | | | 9.3 0.2289 0.0006 DM FILE P3 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE VARIATE V003 DM LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 2.81507 469178 0.82 0.569 NL 2.99344 997812 1.75 0.193 * RESIDUAL 18 10.2843 571349 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 27 16.0928 596029 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE P3 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS DM 6.96255 7.05998 7.07361 4 7.42163 7.51776 7.44305 7.24153 SE(N= 4) 0.377938 5%LSD 18DF 1.12291 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS DM 71 6.87682 7.38796 6.57647 6.59882 SE(N= 7) 0.285694 5%LSD 18DF 0.848840 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE P3 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT (N= 28) SD/MEAN | NO BASED ON BASED ON OBS TOTAL SS RESID SS DM 28 6.8600 0.77203 0.75588 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE | % | | |NL | | | | | | 11.0 0.5691 0.1925 DM FILE P4 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE VARIATE V003 DM LN SOURCE OF VARIATION SQUARES DF SUMS OF MEAN SQUARES F RATIO PROB ER LN ============================================================================= CT 8.13778 1.35630 0.93 0.496 NL 6.32913 2.10971 1.45 0.260 * RESIDUAL 18 26.1522 1.45290 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 27 40.6191 1.50441 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE P4 16/ 1/18 20: :PAGE MEANS FOR EFFECT CT CT NOS DM 12.5100 14.1357 14.4858 4 16.9393 16.0333 17.0466 16.0523 SE(N= 4) 5%LSD 18DF 0.602681 1.79065 72 MEANS FOR EFFECT NL NL NOS DM 12.5261 13.1177 13.5678 13.7616 SE(N= 7) 5%LSD 18DF 0.455584 1.35361 - 73