Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG Human behavior and the social environment, seventh edition dale, orren SRG
Trang 2Competency Chapter
Professional Identity
Practice Behavior Examples…
Serve as representatives of the profession, its mission, and its core values
Know the profession’s history
Commit themselves to the profession’s enhancement and to their own professional conduct
and growth
Advocate for client access to the services of social work
Practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development
Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication 11
Engage in career-long learning
Use supervision and consultation
Ethical Practice
Practice Behavior Examples…
Obligation to conduct themselves ethically and engage in ethical decision-making
Know about the value base of the profession, its ethical standards, and relevant law
Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide
practice
3, 13
Make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social Workers
Code of Ethics and, as applicable, of the International Federation of Social Workers/
International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of
Principles
Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions 2, 11, 14
Critical Thinking
Practice Behavior Examples…
Know about the principles of logic, scientific inquiry, and reasoned discernment 4, 13
Use critical thinking augmented by creativity and curiosity 8
Requires the synthesis and communication of relevant information 12
Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including
research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom
1, 10Analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation 14
Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families,
groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues
Trang 3Competency Chapter
Diversity in Practice
Practice Behavior Examples…
Understand how diversity characterizes and shapes the human experience and is
critical to the formation of identity
4, 13
Understand the dimensions of diversity as the intersectionality of multiple factors
including age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity and
expression, immigration status, political ideology, race, religion, sex, and sexual
orientation
Appreciate that, as a consequence of difference, a person’s life experiences may
include oppression, poverty, marginalization, and alienation as well as privilege,
power, and acclaim
Recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress,
marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege, and power
15
Gain sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal biases and values
in working with diverse groups
Recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of difference in
shaping life experiences
3, 9, 10View themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants 6
Human Rights & Justice
Practice Behavior Examples…
Understand that each person, regardless of position in society, has basic human rights,
such as freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and
education
5
Recognize the global interconnections of oppression and are knowledgeable about
theories of justice and strategies to promote human and civil rights
Incorporates social justice practices in organizations, institutions, and society to ensure
that these basic human rights are distributed equitably and without prejudice
8Understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination
Advocate for human rights and social and economic justice 15
Engage in practices that advance social and economic justice 4
Research Based Practice
Practice Behavior Examples…
Use practice experience to inform research, employ evidence-based interventions,
evaluate their own practice, and use research findings to improve practice, policy, and
social service delivery
Comprehend quantitative and qualitative research and understand scientific and ethical
approaches to building knowledge
7Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry
Trang 4Competency Chapter
Human Behavior
Practice Behavior Examples…
Know about human behavior across the life course; the range of social systems in
which people live; and the ways social systems promote or deter people in maintaining
or achieving health and well-being
4, 5, 8
Apply theories and knowledge from the liberal arts to understand biological, social,
cultural, psychological, and spiritual development
6, 11, 12
Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and
evaluation
1, 3, 7Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment 2, 9, 10, 13, 15
Policy Practice
Practice Behavior Examples…
Understand that policy affects service delivery and they actively engage in policy
practice
11
Know the history and current structures of social policies and services; the role of
policy in service delivery; and the role of practice in policy development
7, 15Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being 2, 13
Collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action
Practice Contexts
Practice Behavior Examples…
Keep informed, resourceful, and proactive in responding to evolving organizational,
community, and societal contexts at all levels of practice
3
Recognize that the context of practice is dynamic, and use knowledge and skill to
respond proactively
9, 10
Continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific
and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant
services
6, 12
Provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to
improve the quality of social services
7
Trang 5Competency Chapter
Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate
Practice Behavior Examples…
Identify, analyze, and implement evidence-based interventions designed to achieve
client goals
Use research and technological advances
Evaluate program outcomes and practice effectiveness
Develop, analyze, advocate, and provide leadership for policies and services
Promote social and economic justice
A) ENGAGEMENT
A substantively and effectively prepare for action with individuals, families, groups,
organizations, and communities
5Use empathy and other interpersonal skills
Develop a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes
B) ASSESSMENT
Collect, organize, and interpret client data
Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives
C) INTERVENTION
Implement prevention interventions that enhance client capacities
Help clients resolve problems
Negotiate, mediate, and advocate for clients
Facilitate transitions and endings
D) EVALUATION
Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions
Trang 6My Search Lab Connections in This Text
In addition to the outstanding research and writing tools and a complete eText in MySearchLab,
this site contains a wealth of resources for social work students
Below is a listing of the videos and readings found in MySearchLab, keyed to each chapter in this text.
In addition, a wealth of assessment questions (including those based on CSWE’s core competencies)
and useful online resources can be found under the appropriate chapters in MySearchLab.
V I D E O S
* Applying Critical Thinking (1)
Entry to the Social Work Profession (2)
* The Ecological Model Using the Freire Method (2)
* Developing an Action Plan that Changes the Internal and External (3)
* Professional Demeanor (4)
* Professional Roles and Boundaries (4)
Battle Between Faith and Science (5)
In Crowd and Social Cruelty (10)
* Providing Leadership to Promote Change to Improve Quality of Social Services (11)
* Tolerating Ambiguity in Resolving Conflicts (11)
* Ethical Practice-Managing Personal Values: The Code of Ethics (12)
* Building Alliances (12)
* Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate Community Organization (12)
* Recognizing Personal Values (13)
* Engaging Clients to Share Their Experience of Alienation, Marginalization and/or Oppression (13)
MS13: Gang Life (14)
* Keeping up with Shifting Contexts (15)
* = CSWE Core Competency Asset
Δ = Case Study
Trang 7My Search Lab Connections in this Text
R E A D I N G S
* Human Behavior (1)
Δ Ethical Dilemmas (2)
Δ Mothers versus the Board of Education (3)
Δ Community to Community: A Unique Response to Long Term Disaster Relief (3)
* Professional Identity (4)
Δ Volunteer Experiences with Neighbor Helping Neighbor Program (4)
Self-Psychology (5)
Object Relations Theory (5)
Δ Attachment & Grief in a Stepfamily with Children Adopted Internationally (5)
Δ A Narrative in New Masculinity (6)
Δ Elderly People (6)
Δ Impact of Childhood Trauma on Development, The (6)
Δ Dylan James: A Case in School Social Work (7)
Cognitive Theory (8)
Δ The Leon Family (9)
Δ Multigenerational Abuse: The Santiago Story (9)
Δ Family Feud (9)
Δ Group Work Ethics (10)
Δ Caregiver Support Group, A (10)
Δ Adventures in Budgets and Finances (11)
Δ Supervisory Dilemmas for a Newly Promoted Community Health Care Clinic Manager (11)
Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from a Birmingham Jail (15)
Lyndon B Johnson, War on Poverty (15)
The Gay Liberation Front, Come Out (15)
Jane Addams, Twenty Years at Hull House (15)
Δ Veterans of the Vietnam War (15)
* = CSWE Core Competency AssetΔ
Δ = Case Study
Trang 8human Behavior
and the Social
environment
Social Systems Theory
Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River
Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto
Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo
Trang 9Executive Editor: Ashley Dodge
Editorial Product Manager:
Carly Czech
Editorial Assistant: Nicole Suddeth
Vice President/Director of Marketing:
Brandy Dawson
Executive Marketing Manager:
Wendy Albert
Marketing Assistant: Frank Alarcon
Production Manager: Fran Russello Editorial Production Service:
Sudip Sinha/PreMediaGlobal
Cover Administrator: Jayne Conte Cover Designer: Karen Noferi Cover Image Credit: Bruce Rolff/
Shutterstock
Interior Design: Joyce Weston Design
Credits appear on Page 422, which constitutes an extension of the copyright
page.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003 by Pearson Education, Inc.
All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America This publication
is protected by Copyright and permission should be obtained from the
publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system,
or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or likewise To obtain permission(s) to use material
from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc.,
Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
07458 or you may fax your request to 201-236-3290.
Many of the designations by manufacturers and seller to distinguish their
products are claimed as trademarks Where those designations appear in this
book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have
been printed in initial caps or all caps.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Dale, Orren.
Human behavior and the social environment: social systems theory /
Orren Dale, Rebecca Smith — 7th ed.
p cm.
Previous ed cataloged under title.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-0-205-03648-6
ISBN-10: 0-205-03648-1
1 Social service 2 Social systems 3 Social systems—Mathematical
models 4 Human behavior I Smith, Rebecca, 1949- II Human behavior
and the social environment III Title.
Instructor Edition
ISBN 10: 0-205-03650-3 ISBN 13: 978-0-205-03650-9
à la Carte Edition
ISBN 10: 0-205-03704-6 ISBN 13: 978-0-205-03704-9
Trang 10Theories as Maps: Grand, Middle Range, and Focal Theories 10Summary 12
PRACtiCe teSt 13MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 14
2. The Foundations for Social Systems Theory 15
The Nature of Theory 16Social Systems Perspective 18General Systems Theory 19Ecological Theory 24Generalist Social Work Practice and Person in the Environment 25Functional Theory 27
Symbolic Interactionism and Role Theory 30Summary 35
PRACtiCe teSt 37MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 38
3. Social Systems and Social Work 39
Social Systems in Generalist Practice 40Development of Social Systems 41Social Systems Cycle 42
Social Systems Features 46
Trang 11Definitions of Social System Elements 47
Boundary 47 Suprasystem 50 Interface 51 Input 52 Proposed Output 54 Conversion Operations 55 Output 56
Feedback 58
Summary 60PRACtiCe teSt 62MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 63
PRACtiCe teSt 90MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 91
5. Psychodynamic Theories 92
Individual Theory: The First Wave 93Psychoanalytic/Psychodynamic Theory 94
Focus 95 Assumptions 95 Concepts 96
Theoretical Base of Analytical Psychology 104Theoretical Base of Individual Psychology 106Childhood Attachment Theory 108
Object Relations Theory 110Neurosis and Striving 111The Sane Society 113
Authoritarianism 114 Destructiveness 114 Automaton Conformity 114
Psychodynamic Theory in Systems Perspective 117
Trang 12Summary 118PRACtiCe teSt 120MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 121
6. Psychosocial Theory: A Social Systems Perspective 122
Psychosocial Theory 123
Focus 123 Assumptions 124 Concepts 124
The Biological Connection 128
Causation 128 Genetics 128 Evolution 129
Trang 137. Behavioral Learning Theories 152
Behavioral Learning Theory 153
Focus 155 Assumptions 155
Concepts 156
Reinforcement 156 Punishment 158 Time Out 160 Contingency Management 160 Generalization 161
Stimulus Binding 161 Discrimination 162 Shaping 162 Cueing 162 Reinforcement Schedules 162 Extinction 166
Social Learning Theory 167Cognitive Behavioral Theory 169
Rational Emotive Behavior Theory 169 Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Mood Disorders 172 Positive Psychology 173
Summary 174PRACtiCe teSt 176MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 177
8. Cognitive and Humanistic Theories 178
Third Wave: Cognitive and Humanistic Theories 179Cognitive Development Theory 179
Focus 180 Assumptions 180 Concepts 181 Piaget’s Four Stages 182 Summary 186
Moral Development Theory 187
Focus 188 Assumptions 188 Concepts 189 Gender-Related Differences 191
Humanistic Theory 194
Assumptions 195 Concepts 196
Person-Centered Theory 199
Trang 14Summary 203PRACtiCe teSt 205MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 206
9. Family Theories 207
Families as Emergent Structures 208Structural Family Theory 210
Family Subsystems 214 Family System Boundaries 220
Family Systems Theory 224
Differentiation 224 Triangles 225 Nuclear Family Emotional Process 226 Family Projection Process 226
Multigenerational Transmission Process 227 Social Environment 227
Emotional Cutoff 228 Societal Emotional Process 229
Communications/Interactive Theory 230
Metacommunications 231 Double Bind Communication 232 Family Homeostasis 233
Summary 234PRACtiCe teSt 236MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 237
10. Group Theories 238
Social Groups 239Collections, Categories, and the Social Group 240
Collections of People 241 Categories of People 241
Primary and Secondary Groups 242Natural and Rational Will 245Formed versus Natural Groups 245Task versus Treatment Groups 246Field Theory 248
Assumptions 248
Exchange Theory 250Psychoanalytic Tavistock Groups 252Behavioral Group Theory 253
Trang 15Role Theory in Groups 253Dimensions of Group Process 254
Interaction Process Analysis 254 Needs-Based Motivational Model 254 Interpersonal Underworld 255 Individual Personality Temperament and Group Process 255
In-Groups and Out-Groups: Boundaries and Identity 257Stages of Group Development 260
Group Therapeutic Factors 261Group Leadership 262
Summary 264PRACTICE TEST 266MYSEARCHLAB CONNECTIONS 267
The Weberian Bureaucracy—the Rationalist Position 275
A Hierarchical Authority Structure 275 Division of Labor 276
Standardization of Role Performance 277 Depersonalization of Position 278
Decision making Guided by Rules Based in Law and/or Administrative Policy 279
Scientific Management and the Classical Tradition 280 Rationalist Position and Social Systems Theory 281
The Human Relations Position 282
Human Relations Position and Social Systems Theory 285
The Dialectic 286Social Systems Theory: Emergence 287Social Systems Theory: Definitions for Organizations 289Social Systems Theory: Developmental Stages of Formal Organizations 291
Social Systems Theory: Total Quality Management 293Theories X, Y, and Z 294
Summary 295PRACTICE TEST 296MYSEARCHLAB CONNECTIONS 297
Trang 16The Community Power Position 306
Assumptions 307
Community Power: The Elitist Position 308
Assumptions 308 Concepts 308 The Regional City Study 309
Community Power: The Pluralist Position 312
Assumptions 312 Concepts 314
The Conflict Position 315The Community System Cycle 319Communities of Interest 322
Toward a Definition 323
Stagnation and Emergence in Communities: Two Illustrations 325
Rural Communities as Stagnant Systems 326 AIDS: A Community of Interest 329
Summary 332PRACtiCe teSt 334MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 335
13. Theories Applied to Addiction 336
Defining Addiction 337Measuring Addiction 338Toward a Theory of Addiction 338The Natural Mind 339
The Psychiatric Model 341Existing Theories: A Sampler 344
Choice Theories 344 Compulsion and Self-Control Theories 345 Drug Transitions: Gateway Theories 346 Recovery Oriented Theories 346
The Transtheoretical Model: Stages of Change 348 Conditioning Theories 349
Exposure Theory 350 Differential Association 351
Trang 17Assessing Addiction Theory and Treatment 354
What Activities Are Addictive? 354 Who Becomes Addicted? 355 What Environmental Conditions Promote Addiction? 355 How Does Addiction Develop? 355
What Other Symptoms Accompany Addiction? 355
Is There a Uniform Experience of Addiction? 355
Do Different Addictions Overlap? 355 What Triggers the Decision to Try to Stop an Addiction? 356 What Are the Steps from Being Addicted to a State of Active Recovery? 356 What Makes for Successful Recovery? 356
What Addiction Treatments Are Effective? 356 What Common Problems Are Related to Addiction? 357 What Makes Something Addictive? 357
What Determines Susceptibility to Addiction? 357 What Makes an Environment Pathological? 357
Effects of Interventions 358
Is Treating the Symptom Effective? 358 What Are the Basic Principles of Effective Intervention? 358 Should You Press for Immediate Action for Change? 358 Does Education Change Behavior? 358
What Are Treatment Intervention Goals? 359
Summary 359PRACtiCe teSt 361MYSeARChLAB ConneCtionS 362
Violence as a Mental Disorder 369 Intermittent Explosive Disorder 369 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 369 Borderline Personality Disorder 370
Conduct Disorder 371 Antisocial Personality Disorder 372
Violence as Crime 373Operant Learning 376Exchange Theory 378Social Learning 380Domestic Violence 382
Trang 18Bullying 385Summary 386PRACTICE TEST 387MYSEARCHLAB CONNECTIONS 388
15 Theories on Social Systems, Social Capital, and Diversity 389
Introduction 390
Culture Wars: How the West Won 390 Modernism: Mastering Nature 390 Postmodernism: A Philosophy Fragmentation 391
Cultural Diversity 392Social Systems Theory 396
The Function of Dysfunction 396 Open and Closed Systems 397 Boundary Effect 397
Minority Status as a Holon 399
Social Capital 401Conflict and Consensus 404
The Wrong Crowd 405 Irreconcilable Differences 405
Conflict, Religion, and Diversity 406Ethics and Cultural Diversity 409
Poverty 413
Summary 413PRACTICE TEST 414MYSEARCHLAB CONNECTIONS 415
References 416Photo Credits 422Index 423
Trang 19Prior editions were formatted in parts to facilitate the teaching of the content
in either one course (usually at the graduate level) or a series of two courses (usually at the undergraduate level) That format required the repetition of some material throughout the five parts of the text to ensure that students had the opportunity to review the major concepts as they progressed through the course sequence With the elimination of parts, we have the opportunity to include both new and expanded material
This edition is organized around the new professional competencies dated by the Council on Social Work Education It is apparent in the format
man-of this text that we have worked to link the text to the relevant areas man-of nated core competencies, which are organized around the concept of general-ist social work practice With the help of Ashley Dodge and Carly Czech, we have formatted the text to highlight the linkage of theories to required practice skills It is our hope that this format will help you develop a unified view of the total range of professional social work activities
desig-We have included a significant new section on role theory, which we ent as a logical extension of systems theory concepts and dynamics This new edition provides support for the systems thinking model presented Following the CSWE paradigm, we have organized the discussion of theories in a roughly increasing order of magnitude from individuals, families, groups, organiza-tions, and communities As before, we have noted that many theories have implications and application to multiple system levels We have noted where theories complement or contradict one another in our effort to promote a more systematic eclecticism among practitioners In addition, we have added chap-ters on the application of theories to special populations
pres-This is the first edition that does not include major new contributions by Wayne Chess and Julia Norlin, the originators of this text The original idea of the book was to develop a single volume that offers an ambitious overview of all the theories that undergird social work practice The use of systems theory
as a matrix to bring some order to this endeavor began with Wayne and Judy
This edition is very much a continuation of that conception The work that these two valued friends and colleagues have done to apply systems concepts
to theory development and presentation is part of their lasting professional legacy In addition, we have missed arguing about whether systems concepts
Trang 20are a theory or a model; whether you can write a book about human behavior
without talking about individuals, and whether Talcott Parsons is a stooge for
the establishment Not many people care about such things We have missed
the mud-wrestling about these and other arcane trivia
We want to congratulate you, the emergent social worker, on your choice
of this profession The environment in which you have chosen to begin your
studies is challenging Times have been difficult, and as always there are those
who want to make the first notch in belt tightening in the services to the poor,
oppressed, and needy These are the times when the people we serve need
us to be at our best and our most resolute We welcome you to the ongoing
struggle to promote human well-being and dignity
Trang 22Professional Identity
Ethical Practice
Critical Thinking
Diversity in Practice
Research Based Practice
Human Behavior
Policy Practice
Practice Contexts Engage, Assess,
Theory and Practice in Social Work:
Connecting the Dots 7
Theoretical Range 9
Theories as Maps: Grand, Middle Range, and Focal Theories 10
Summary 12Practice Test 13Mysearchlab Connections 14
C h a p t e r O u t l i n e
Introduction
1
Trang 23HuMAn BEHAvIoR THEoRy AnD SoCIAl WoRk PRACTICE
Human behavior is, to put it mildly, a puzzle All around us we see daily dence that people are alternately kind and cruel, wise and foolish, generous and selfish We are bombarded constantly with conflicting images of human nature Consider the following headlines as illustrations:
evi-Hero Fireman Saves ChildrenFather Convicted of Child AbuseEarthquake Orphans Find New Homes in U.S., France
No Aid for Growing Numbers of RefugeesYou have seen similar headlines on a daily basis Thoughtful readers are left shaking their heads at the paradox of human nature, on the one hand inex-plicably cruel, on the other inspirationally brave and selfless Our efforts to un-derstand and predict human behavior seem to be hopeless in the face of such contradictions Social work practice exposes us to the best and worst in human nature on a regular basis Despite the apparently irreconcilable extremes, it is our nature to seek some framework to understand and manage human behav-ior This book is dedicated to that quest, and to providing an overview of the myriad theories that have been developed to help bring order to the apparent chaos around us
One of the oldest attempts to understand the apparently contradictory truths of our existence is the allegory of the blind men and the elephant You know the outlines of the story There are versions of it in all of the world’s great religious and moral traditions In the Jain version, six blind men are asked to describe an elephant Each touches some part of the elephant, and then relates his understanding of the animal The man who grabs the tail believes the el-ephant resembles a rope The man who strokes the elephant’s ear believes the beast is like a fan The man who touches a leg believes the elephant is like a post, and so on Afterward, a wise man explains that each of them is correct:
The elephant has all the properties described (Jain, 2006)
In this story, the wise man (presumably one with sight) represents the tegration of various perspectives on the truth In our study of theories of hu-man behavior, we will encounter many blind men holding firmly to their own piece of the elephant, believing their own truths and discounting the theories
in-of others We hope that by the end in-of this book, you will have made peace with the fact that no one theory encompasses all of human nature Each theory, as
we will discuss, has some grasp of the truth None has a complete or exclusive handle on the understanding of human beings We hope that if we put together enough different partial truths, we can get at least a general picture of human nature In epistemology (the study of knowledge in philosophy), this process
of patching theories together to cover gaps is called syncretism (Merton, 1968).
The hodgepodge of theories relating to human behavior, like the blind men’s data on the nature of elephants, leaves us with the need to develop
what is called an eclectic perspective Eclectic is derived from the Greek eklektikos, meaning to select (World Book, Inc., 2010) One of the goals of
this book is for you to develop a systematic framework for your own tic view of human behavior This will require the development of skills in
eclec-critical thinking as you consider each theory in turn, and the uses to which
you will put that theory in your social work practice What will almost
Trang 24What will almost surely emerge is a unique and personal view of human nature, influenced by your own experience and your own critical integration of existing theory and practice.
surely emerge is a unique and personal view of human nature, influenced
by your own experience and your own critical integration of existing theory
and practice It is our hope that by organizing your view according to some
common principles, you will be better able to share your view with others,
and test your perspective against the new approaches that will continue to
emerge as long as you practice social work
In order to foster the skills of critical thinking and the use of a common vocabulary, this book is organized around the guiding premises of social work
education These premises are developed by the Council on Social Work
Edu-cation (CSWE), which is the organization charged with the accreditation of all
social work programs in the United States Central to the mission of CSWE is
the idea of core competencies Core competencies are the actual skills that are
required for generalist social work practice (Council on Social Work
Educa-tion, 2008)
There are ten core competencies required by CSWE, and whenever one of these competencies is addressed in this text, there will be a marginal note in-
serted The appearance of this symbol (see Figure 1.1) will be accompanied by
questions for reflection on the content and the application to the competency
in question
CSWE CoRE CoMPETEnCIES
Listed below are the ten core competencies required of all social workers by the
Council on Social Work Education (2008) Each competency represents an
observ-able skill that should be mastered at the foundation level of social work education
1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself ingly Social workers serve as representatives of the profession, its
accord-mission, and its core values They know the profession’s history Social workers commit themselves to the profession’s enhancement and to their own professional conduct and growth
2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional tice Social workers have an obligation to conduct themselves ethi-
prac-cally and to engage in ethical decision-making Social workers are knowledgeable about the value base of the profession, its ethical stan-dards, and relevant law
3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments Social workers are knowledgeable about the principles of
logic, scientific inquiry, and reasoned discernment They use critical thinking augmented by creativity and curiosity Critical thinking also requires the synthesis and communication of relevant information
4 Engage diversity and difference in practice Social workers
under-stand how diversity characterizes and shapes the human experience
and is critical to the formation of identity The dimensions of diversity are understood as the intersectionality of multiple factors including age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity and expression, immigration status, political ideology, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation Social workers appreciate that, as a con-sequence of difference, a person’s life experiences may include op-pression, poverty, marginalization, and alienation as well as privilege, power, and acclaim
Figure 1.1
CSWE Core Competency
Trang 255 Advance human rights and social and economic justice Each person,
regardless of position in society, has basic human rights, such as freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and educa-tion Social workers recognize the global interconnections of oppression and are knowledgeable about theories of justice and strategies to promote human and civil rights Social work incorporates social justice practices
in organizations, institutions, and society to ensure that these basic man rights are distributed equitably and without prejudice
6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed
re-search Social workers use practice experience to inform research,
employ evidence-based interventions, evaluate their own practice, and use research findings to improve practice, policy, and social ser-vice delivery Social workers comprehend quantitative and qualitative research and understand scientific and ethical approaches to building knowledge
7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social
environ-ment Social workers are knowledgeable about human behavior
across the life course; the range of social systems in which people live; and the ways social systems promote or deter people in main-taining or achieving health and well-being Social workers apply theories and knowledge from the liberal arts to understand biological, social, cultural, psychological, and spiritual development
8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being
and to deliver effective social work services Social work
practitio-ners understand that policy affects service delivery, and they actively engage in policy practice Social workers know the history and cur-rent structures of social policies and services; the role of policy in ser-vice delivery; and the role of practice in policy development
9 Respond to contexts that shape practice Social workers are
in-formed, resourceful, and proactive in responding to evolving zational, community, and societal contexts at all levels of practice
organi-Social workers recognize that the context of practice is dynamic, and use knowledge and skill to respond proactively
10 Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities Professional practice in-
volves the dynamic and interactive processes of engagement, ment, intervention, and evaluation at multiple levels
assess-Adapted with the permission of the council on Social Work Education.
GEnERAlIST PRACTICE
Generalist practice is the perspective that forms the foundation of social work
practice and is the point of departure for refining practice skills at more vanced levels It is also the educational model that forms the foundation of all social work programs Generalist practice is rooted in the traditions of the pro-fession, based on the early need for social workers who could do whatever was needed for clients in a time of patchy social services and few human resources
ad-Today, generalist practice dictates that all social workers be familiar with the various intervention methods of the profession, and have the ability to work
Trang 26with social systems of all sizes The following definition of generalist practice
comes from the Council on Social Work Education:
Generalist practice is grounded in the liberal arts and the person and vironment construct To promote human and social well-being, generalist practitioners use a range of prevention and intervention methods in their practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communi-ties The generalist practitioner identifies with the social work profession and applies ethical principles and critical thinking in practice Generalist practitioners incorporate diversity in their practice and advocate for hu-man rights and social and economic justice They recognize, support, and build on the strengths and resiliency of all human beings They engage in research-informed practice and are proactive in responding to the impact
en-of context on pren-ofessional practice BSW practice incorporates all en-of the core competencies (Council on Social Work Education, 2008, p 7)
From Education Policy and Accreditation Standards, Generalist Practice pp 7–8
Copyright © 2008 Reprinted by permission of the Council on Social Work Education.
Social workers are required to have the knowledge and skills to practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities Most of
these social systems have a body of theories that address the specific range of
phenomena that define that system This book is organized so that the theories
that relate to each level of social system are grouped together However, it will
become quickly apparent that there are a number of theories that have
applica-tions to multiple levels of systems (Merton, 1968) For example, role theory
ap-plies to almost all system levels to a greater or lesser extent So also do theories
such as behavioral learning theory and psychodynamic theory For this reason,
you will find that some theories are presented in a number of chapters as they
relate to the system being discussed
Embedded in the CSWE description of generalist practice is a reference to
what is usually referred to as the strengths perspective (Saleebey, 1996) This
is a general disposition that views differences between people and groups as
a potential source of benefit, rather than as a sign of defectiveness or
weak-ness A major example of this is found in the difference between the strengths
perspective and the diagnostic approach to mental illness The diagnostic
ap-proach collects individual behaviors into clusters of “symptoms” that are then
used in applying a pathological behavior label to a client In the past, this
la-beling process was used in ways that have significantly restricted or injured
people to whom the label was applied For instance, a person whose quick
mind and creative energy might seem a strength to a social worker is at risk of
being diagnosed as having “attention deficit disorder.” The assignment of this
label might well result in loss of educational opportunities and/or
prescrip-tion of drugs such as Ritalin or Adderall These medicaprescrip-tions in turn may pose
unwanted and unwarranted risks to some clients (Szasz, 1977)
It is important that we discuss one other note about the CSWE definition before we proceed The generalist practice definition states that social workers
engage in research-informed practice We believe that this has a special
mean-ing for the theoretical content in this book Usually, research-informed practice
would mean that social workers use only practice techniques that have been
shown to be effective with a client problem
This example might illustrate the point A woman who suffers from traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) might be expected to benefit from a technique
post-such as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), an approach
Trang 27that has been widely and positively reviewed in application to this type of problem At this time, the underlying theory of the way that EMDR works is still unclear As there are positive clinical indicators for this technique, we might still feel it is worthwhile to identify this technique as supported by re-search even though our understanding of its restorative process is still being developed By comparison, a technique called Critical Incident Stress Debrief-ing, widely used to prevent PTSD, has been shown to be relatively ineffective (Mitchell, 2003) and therefore would not be utilized.
In this book we will discuss and describe some theories or techniques whose use is not supported by current research in or-der to illustrate the process of validating theories and techniques through research Sometimes there is much to be learned from a good idea that didn’t work out Finally, we will include in our dis-cussions of all theories a reference to the current status of empiri-cal support for the theory Note that this will be an uneven process, since some theories do not lend themselves readily to empirical (scientific) validation by their very nature
In order to accomplish the mastery of the generalist practice competencies, social work educators have developed a uniform approach to the organization of the curriculum All accredited schools of social work employ some variant of the following ele-ments in developing their curriculum The following content areas are present in all social work curricula:
• Values and ethics The curriculum prepares the student to understand
personal and professional values, the role of professional ethics, and the application of the NASW Code of Ethics
• Diversity The curriculum prepares students to recognize the interaction
between culture and personal identity, and to foster culturally relevant programs and practice methods
• Social and economic justice and human rights The curriculum
pre-pares students to understand the dynamics of at-risk populations, and the impact of this status on access to productive interventions In addi-tion, social work is committed to combating injustice and oppression and advocating for human rights Students are prepared to practice and advocate for nondiscriminatory social and economic systems
• Human behavior and the social environment Theories link the person
to the environment and provide the empirical base to social work ventions This includes information on life span development, the full spectrum of social systems (individual, family, group, organization, and community) and the impact of social systems on promoting or deterring the achievement of well-being
inter-• Social welfare policy and services Programs provide content about
the history of social work, the history and current structures of social welfare services, and the role of policy in service delivery, social work practice, and attainment of individual and social well-being Under-standing and skills in policy analysis or promotion of effective services
is stressed
• Social work practice Social work practice content focuses on strengths,
capacities, and resources of client systems in relation to their broader environments Students learn practice content that encompasses knowledge and skills to work with individuals, families, groups,
Critical Thinking
Practice Behavior Example:
Distin-guish, appraise, and integrate
mul-tiple sources of knowledge, including
research-based knowledge, and
prac-tice wisdom.
Critical Thinking Question: What is the
relationship between human behavior
and social environment theory and
critical thinking?
Trang 28organizations, and communities This content includes engaging clients;
identifying issues, problems, needs, resources, and assets; collecting and assessing information; and planning for service delivery It includes applying empirical knowledge and technological advances; evaluating program outcome effectiveness; developing, analyzing, advocating, and providing leadership for policies and services; and promoting social and economic justice
• Research This content prepares students to develop, use, and
commu-nicate empirically based knowledge and evidence-based interventions
Research knowledge is used by social workers to provide services; to initiate change; to improve practice, policy, and social service delivery;
and to evaluate their own practice
• Field education Field education occurs in settings that reinforce
stu-dents’ identification with the purposes, values, and ethics of the sion; fosters the integration of empirical and practice-based knowledge;
profes-and promotes professional competence Field education is cally designed, supervised, coordinated, and evaluated to promote the achievement of program objectives (Council on Social Work Education,
systemati-2008, p 8)
THEoRy AnD PRACTICE In SoCIAl WoRk:
ConnECTInG THE DoTS
This is a book about theories of human behavior, and it is worth our time to
take a moment to discuss the role and value of theories in social work In
ev-eryday conversation, many people use the word theory in contrast to practical,
as in, “That’s nice in theory, but that isn’t how it works in real life!” Social
work is a practical profession, so what need do we have for theories?
Trang 29Good theories are intimately tied to their practical applications The pose of theory is the prediction and control of events This is accomplished
pur-by using theories to explain the relationship among observed variables As the world becomes more complicated, we need theories as a road map to under-stand how things are connected For a simple example, we observe that some men beat their wives We observe that many of these men drink a lot of alco-hol It is tempting to conclude that alcohol abuse leads to spouse abuse That explains the relationship between two observed variables and constitutes a simple theory of wife beating
Obviously, our alcohol theory is pretty basic and leaves out a lot of other variables For example, not all men who drink also beat their wives Moreover, not all men who beat their wives drink Hmmm, now what? Like so many the-ories of human behavior, this theory does not account for all of the observed behaviors In applying theories to human behavior, we almost never get perfect prediction The gold standard for any theory is the ability to identify the key variables out of all the myriad possibilities that meet two requirements: A key variable will always predict the behavior, and the behavior will never occur in
the absence of that variable When we have that degree of relationship, we are pretty sure that a cause-and-effect rela-tionship exists between the two variables
In theories of human behavior, we rarely see clear-cut cause and effect, where one variable alone causes the oc-currence of another Most of the time, theories of human behavior describe contributing variables rather than cause-and-effect relationships Thus, alcohol abuse might contrib-ute to spouse abuse, but it is neither necessary nor sufficient
to cause spouse abuse
The process of identifying, describing, measuring, and testing the variables and their relationship is the heart of theory building Our example leads to
a conclusion: Good theory building involves careful observation, measurable
description, and testing of our hypotheses about the variables we observe An hypothesis is simply a hunch; based on our observations, we think that we
have an idea about which variables contribute to or preclude certain iors We then put that hunch to a test by creating conditions under which we can manipulate the variables and observe the outcome
behav-In science, the best method for hypothesis testing is to conduct ments This is common in the so-called hard sciences such as physics and chemistry In the behavioral sciences, concern for the well-being of the sub-jects limits our ability to use experimental tests of hypotheses Imagine the outcry if we took a group of men and randomly had some drink alcohol heav-ily and some not, then observed the effect on the incidence of spouse abuse
experi-In addition, the factors involved in human behavior are so subtle and varied that it would be virtually impossible to control them all As a result, we rely on sample size and statistical methods in many cases to provide the rigor that we lose by not using classical experiments
As in the physical sciences, behavioral science gives rise to both grand ories and focal theories of limited range The definitions of these terms vary, but the essence is clear Some theories are useful for a wide range of subjects and situations, such as the notion that behavior is shaped by the positive and negative consequences that follow This is the so-called Law of Effect, which
the-is more properly a theory that can generate testable hypotheses Other theories apply only to a narrow range of subjects or situations Many focal theories of
Good theories are
intimately tied to their
practical applications.
Human Behavior
Practice Behavior Example: Utilize
concep-tual frameworks to guide the processes of
assessment, intervention, and evaluation.
Critical Thinking Question: What are your
views on the causes of human behavior?
Trang 30limited range exist and have value in social work, and many are in conflict
with grand theories that dominate the field
When we have tested an hypothesis (or a number of related hypotheses) a number of times and the results consistently confirm the expected results, we
arrive at a theory A valid scientific theory then generates new hypotheses that
are testable In this way, science continually challenges its own beliefs The
scientific method, to be effective, must involve open communication of the
tests and results The values of science demand that no theory ever be
consid-ered proven Some explanations are found to be generally useful, even when
they do not strictly describe reality These useful aggregates are sometimes
re-ferred to as models, which aid our understanding of events without precisely
describing them Useful as models are, it is theory that advances science
THEoRETICAl RAnGE
Generalist practice, you have no doubt noted, covers a lot of territory For that
reason, social work practice has always ranged broadly in search of promising
ideas that offer clues on how to help clients These theories have come from
med-icine, religion, philosophy, sociology, psychology, management, economics, and
a host of other places As you would expect, the varied sources of these theories
makes it pretty much inevitable that they do not “speak the same language.” One
of the most common frustrations for beginning students of human behavior is to
realize that almost everyone has different names for things, even when they seem
to be addressing the same things The process of constantly translating from one
theoretical vocabulary to another is both frustrating and potentially confusing
The variety of theories employed in social work is one reason that we continually
seek a unifying language that allows us to communicate more effectively about
the disparate systems with which we work We have chosen role theory as an
intermediary for two reasons: First, it addresses the whole range of human
so-cial interactions with which we are concerned; and second, the language of role
theory is intuitively familiar to most of us As Shaw and Constanzo (1970) noted,
Role theory is a body of knowledge and principles that at one and the same time constitutes an orientation, a group of theories, loosely linked networks of hypotheses, isolated constructs about human functioning in
a social context, and a language system which pervades nearly every cial scientist’s vocabulary (p 295)
so-Excerpts from page 295 in Shaw and Constanzo, THEORIES OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Copyright © 1970 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Reprinted by permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Selecting theories for inclusion in the social work curriculum depends in part on the conformity of the theory with the philosophy of the profession A
theory is comprised of a set of concepts and dynamics that define and explain the
subject matter If the application of the theory is consistent with the purposes and
values of the profession, it may become part of the canon of practice Some
theo-ries, however valid and useful, may be untenable as foundations for social work
practice For instance, if it were learned that beating a child regularly would
in-crease school achievement (decidedly not true in light of current knowledge), it
would be a valid predictive model However, such treatment is inconsistent with
the values and ethics of the profession, and could not be used to guide social
work practice due to the value and ethical problems such a position would pose
Trang 31THEoRIES AS MAPS: GRAnD, MIDDlE RAnGE, AnD FoCAl THEoRIES
Levels of theories can be thought of as maps that guide our practice Let us sume that you are driving from New York to San Francisco for a job interview
as-You start off with a general idea of direction and distance as-You are heading west, and it is a long, long way If you access Map Quest on the world wide web, the first map you call up will show you the cross-country route With this you can rough out the route, calculate the travel time expected, and plan your stops Along the route, you may encounter construction or bad weather
in Kansas, and you look for alternate routes You need more detail than can be provided by the big map, but you are not interested in the street layout in each town you pass through You adjust your route, zoom in, and make efficient ad-justments to local conditions Finally, you get to San Francisco You find you have only the address where you are supposed to go for the interview Now you need the detailed local map, with streets, landmarks, and addresses The local map allows you to hone in on the address you need, and to get there with mini-mal fuss Each map relates to the others, and each guides you to your destina-tion with maximum efficiency Obviously, if the map is wrong, out of date, or poorly linked to the other maps, it interferes with your trip So it is with theo-ries Theories provide the intellectual framework and reference points needed
to guide our practice They work best when they are integrated into an overall vision of the trip, comparable to our professional vision for social work
The eclectic nature of theory in social work today can be understood as
a stage in the development of a unified practice theory Merton (1968) noted
that in social science there is a tendency to create grand theories, which are
highly abstract These theories are internally consistent and often elegant, but they are often rather removed from day-to-day realities The day-to-day stuff is
not theoretical, it is empirical Empirical simply means things that can be
ob-served or experienced directly: Consider the difference, for example, between
a concept like nurturing, which is an abstraction, and giving your child a hug,
which is empirical The advantage of a grand theory is that it can group lots
of different empirical events under one category (hugs, praise, kisses, ments) in order to help us understand common processes The disadvantage
compli-is that when theory becomes too abstract, it may lose relevance for real-world application
Middle range theories serve two purposes First, they hold grand theories accountable to the facts on the ground, the realities of life Second, they provide
a kind of collecting basin for similar theories, which in turn allows, as Merton proposed, that grand theories need to spawn middle range theories (Merton, 1968; Mills & Gitlin, 1959) Middle range theories deal with empirical events, and offer ideas that can be tested in practice Middle range theories, in turn, may draw upon even narrower and more specific theories One purpose of middle range theories is to coordinate the varied terms used by those who create focal
or limited range theories Middle range theories can collect common threads in focal theories and help us understand them by means of a common vocabulary
All theories have a defined range of application In general, the broader
a theory’s range, the less specific its coverage The narrower the range of the theory, the more detail it offers There are three levels of theory discussed in this book These serve as a guide to our understanding and the selection of our practice intervention techniques (Merton, 1968) Let us reverse the order of our travel example, and begin with the detailed map
The eclectic nature
Trang 32Focal theories are narrow in scope and address the behaviors that are
distinc-tive to a particular class or level of social system phenomena For example,
Bowl-by’s theory of reactive attachment disorder addresses the problem of children who
never form an attachment to parents, and whose entire life is skewed as a result of
this distortion in an early primary social relationship (Bowlby, 1969) The theory
focuses on a single type of relationship, a narrow window of time, and a limited
number of variables While it is narrow in focus, it is extremely valuable for those
who are concerned with this issue in child development and family behavior
Middle range theories bridge two or more focal theories Focal theories are
often so focused on the subject matter that they do not utilize a common set of
constructs or terms in describing their topic In fact, theory builders are noted for
insisting on their own definitions for many concepts that may be addressed in
re-lated theories Middle range theories provide the vocabulary and context needed
in order to integrate the focal theories into an orderly professional approach to
problem solving In social work, role theory fulfills this important function For
example, reactive attachment theory grows out of the psychoanalytic tradition and
employs many constructs from that perspective The theory of separation anxiety
used in psychiatry is similar, but uses different language and addresses different
events Role theory can embrace these overlapping ideas, but relates the issues of
attachment disorder to broader constructs (such as mother-child roles, role
prepa-ration, interactions, and appropriate social functioning) Role theory is uniquely
suited to this middle range function and is discussed extensively in this text as a
basis for a common professional language in theory selection and development
Grand theories are broad theoretical generalizations that deal with the
wide-ranging aspects of social phenomena We treat social systems theory as
a grand theory, having sufficient scope and flexibility to accommodate many
narrower-range theories These broad theories are often too general to provide
explicit direction to practice with specific issues The overall dynamics of
liv-ing systems share certain properties that are the focus of social systems theory
In order to integrate social work practice across a range of systems from
indi-viduals to communities, we employ systems theory to orient our practice to the
appropriate level of specificity In addition, social systems theory reminds us
constantly that all social phenomena are related and interdependent Change at
one system level reverberates across all levels, and this must be taken into
ac-count in practice Figure 1.2 illustrates the hierarchy of theories by system size
GRAND THEORY (Social Systems)
MIDDLE RANGE THEORY (Role Theory)
FOCAL THEORY (Individual Development &
Behavior)
FOCAL THEORY (Family Theory)
FOCAL THEORY (Group Theory)
FOCAL THEORY (Organization Theory)
FOCAL THEORY (Community Theory)
Figure 1.2
Hierarchy of Theories by Focal System Size
Trang 33This is a good place to mention a couple of troubling points The first has to
do with social work and social theory By now it is apparent that grand theory
in particular is concerned with finding the patterns and regularities that ist among all social phenomena The problem for social work practice is that while theories search for the rules, social workers deal all the time with people
ex-and problems that break the rules By its nature social work
is concerned with exceptions and uniqueness For this son, social work is constantly trying to find new models of understanding why the grand theories don’t work for some people and some problems but do work for others The his-torical tendency has been to develop focal theories to ad-dress the practice problems, and then over time to wedge these exceptions into the larger theories This is one of the inductive processes by which social work theory is con-stantly renewed
rea-The second problem is that the concept of grand theory itself was nally proposed as an insult In particular, it was an insult aimed at Talcott Parsons’ functional theory The insult was prompted by the belief that Parsons was more interested in creating a theory that was internally consistent and elegant In order to do this, he was charged with ignoring the everyday facts of social life that were supposed to be explained by theory This is a case where Parsons was charged with caring more about the elegance than the relevance
origi-of his theory There may be some validity to the charge, since Parsons did not engage in a great deal of empirical validation of his theory Despite this charge,
we feel that there is an important, even vital, role for grand theory The micro level work of developing theories to address the problems and exceptions en-countered by social workers is constant At the same time, the body of knowl-edge that informs social work practice is continuously massaged to embrace the new data, search for patterns, and provide a medium of language and con-cepts across a broad range of social systems and social issues
Now that you have an introduction to theory and its role in social work practice, we will discuss the foundations of social systems theory in Chapter 2, before presenting social systems theory and the systems cycle in Chapter 3 See Figure 3.1
Professional Identity
Practice Behavior Example: Attend to
professional roles and boundaries.
Critical Thinking Question: What role
does theory play in making professional
judgments?
Trang 34The following questions will test your knowledge and understanding of the content found within this chapter For additional assessment, including licensing-exam type questions on applying
chapter content to practice behaviors, visit MySearchLab.
1 A form of professional practice competently conducted in
a variety of settings with client systems of various sizes at
several levels of prevention using a transferable body of
knowledge, values, and skills is a definition of
a casework
b psychotherapy
c community practice
d generalist practice
2 Research-informed practice means that social workers
use only practice techniques that
a have been shown to be effective with a client problem;
b use inductive reasoning;
c use deductive reasoning;
d are proven.
3 Curriculum that prepares students to recognize the
interac-tion between culture and personal identity is referred to as
a values and ethics
b social work practice
d human behavior theories
6 Theories that are narrow in scope and address the haviors that are distinctive to a particular class or level of social system phenomena are
Trang 35Watch and review
Watch these Videos
* Applying Critical Thinking
read and review
Read these Cases/Documents
∆ Human Behavior
Reinforce what you learned in this chapter by studying videos, cases, documents,
and more available at www.MySearchLab.com.
explore and assess
Explore these Assets
Social Science Research Center: http://www.ssrc.msstate.edu/
Society for Judgment and Decision-Making: http://www.sjdm.org/
Society for Social Work and Research: http://www.sswr.org/
assess Your Knowledge
Assess your knowledge with a variety of topical and chapter assessments
Conclude your assessment by completing the chapter exam
* = CSWE Core Competency Asset
∆ = Case Study
Trang 36Professional Identity
Ethical Practice
Critical Thinking
Diversity in Practice
Human Rights
& Justice
Research Based Practice
Human Behavior
Policy Practice
Practice Contexts
Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate
The Nature of Theory 16
Social Systems Perspective 18
General Systems Theory 19
Ecological Theory 24
Generalist Social Work Practice and Person in
the Environment 25
Functional Theory 27Symbolic Interactionism and Role Theory 30Summary 35
Practice Test 37MySearchLab Connections 38
Trang 37THE NATURE OF THEORY
A scientific theory is a set of interrelated concepts, definitions, and statements about relationships that can be tested empirically The purpose of theory is to increase our ability to predict and control events It further seeks to aid un-derstanding of the world by a systematic process of inquiry and validation of knowledge Robert Merton (1968) suggested that scientific knowledge requires four conditions to be met within the scientific community:
• Disinterestedness—belief that the development of knowledge should
be distinct from the interests of the scientist; that knowledge should be pursued for its own sake
• Communalism—belief in the value of sharing work among scientists.
• Organized skepticism—systematic disposition to challenge the claims
of knowledge; a critical posture toward claims that demands objective assessment
• Universalism—systematic agreement on the nature of knowledge and
knowledge development (methodology)
Thomas Kuhn (1970) speculated that science advances best when ciplines have a shared set of theories and methodological assumptions, which
subdis-he termed paradigms Social systems tsubdis-heory is an application of tsubdis-he general
systems paradigm to social phenomena While it is a high-level theory, it must and does relate directly to the observed world of social interactions
There are three essential elements to all scientific theories: perceptions, conceptions, and syntax
• Perceptions are the observable (empirical) events that are the focus of
the theory Perceptions refer to concrete phenomena (facts) in the real world For example, spanking a child is observable behavior
• Conceptions are the fundamental building blocks of scientific theory
They consist of carefully defined abstractions that are drawn from rience They are abstract rather than concrete and thus are distinguished from facts For example, punishment is an abstraction that defines a cat-egory of behaviors that might include spanking a child
expe-• Syntax refers to the relationship among concepts, particularly causal
re-lationships Statements about the expected relationship between A and
B constitute the syntax of a theory and are considered hypotheses when they are subjected to scientific inquiry For example, spanking a child for screaming might be based on the hypothesis that this punishment will prevent screaming in the future
In order to be considered a theory, a set of percepts, concepts, and syntax must
be capable of generating empirically testable hypotheses For example, the ment that spanking a child immediately after the child is observed screaming will reduce the frequency of the child’s screaming, is a syntactical statement It posits that spanking (punishment) will cause a child to cease a behavior (screaming)
state-Most theories are more than a single statement about relationships There
are two primary types of statements in a theory The first is called an existence statement This defines the exact meaning of each concept in the theory Defi-
nitions as such cannot be empirically tested; thus, they must be carefully ified for inquiry One indication of a weak theory is that it rests upon poorly defined concepts
Trang 38spec-The second type of statement is the relational statement This must specify
to some degree the association between two or more defined concepts These
statements can be empirically tested An example of a relational statement is
that there is a positive relationship between social disorganization and drug
abuse in a population
Statements can be arranged hierarchically according to both their level
of abstraction (an existence consideration) and their degree of truth (a
rela-tional consideration) The hierarchy of theoretical knowledge consists of the
following:
• Laws—the observed regularities in nature
• Axioms—knowledge assumed for some purpose to be true
• Postulates—essential precursors in a train of reasoning
• Propositions—statements affirming or denying a truth subject to proof
• Empirical generalizations—summaries of empirical findings
• Hypotheses—propositions that are empirically testable
Theories require precise definitions of terms They also require consensus
of usage among scientists The degree to which there is agreement within a
community of scientists on the definitions in a theory is termed the semantic
agreement Obviously, if everyone uses a term differently, knowledge building
is impaired Lower-level concepts lend themselves to operational definition,
which solves this problem
The primary opposition to classifying social systems as a theory lies in the level of abstraction of the concepts High levels of abstraction do not preclude
theory development However, high levels of abstraction may affect what is
called the empirical import of a theory, that is, the degree to which the
con-cepts in a theory relate to observable realities in the world
There is an important distinction between the terms abstract and vague
Scientific knowledge will not admit vagueness However, a great deal of our
knowledge exists at a medium to high level of abstraction For example,
spank-ing is a concrete and observable behavior Punishment is more abstract
Spank-ing is an observed event, punishment is an inferred relationship This does
not mean that punishment is vague If we carefully define punishment as any
event that reduces the frequency of a behavior, then it is a precise relational
statement What if we spank a child and the child screams more loudly? For
our theory, we must reconsider whether all spanking can be considered
pun-ishment as we have defined it
What Durkheim (1897) described as “social facts” constitute the focus of systems theory These phenomena exist outside the individual acts of units
within a system, but are characteristic of the system as a whole (Timasheff,
1967) It is our belief that systems concepts and syntax, while highly abstract,
have direct empirical referents in the world of the social work practitioner In
addition, the theory serves to provide a connective matrix to the wide range of
situations and systems with which social workers are daily engaged
A basis for opposing social systems as a theory lies in the varied usage
of the key concepts among professionals Part of the purpose of this book is
to help students move toward consensual usage of terms to permit more
sys-tematic knowledge building using systems concepts Therefore, we have
at-tempted to develop carefully the definitions of key systems concepts to allow
for consistent usage in the profession In addition, we have endeavored to
de-fine the relationship among these concepts in such a way as to form a
founda-tion for systematic percepfounda-tions of social realities Our goal is the development
Trang 39of systems knowledge that is germane in practice, robust enough to withstand skeptical assessment, and capable of generating testable hypotheses that ad-vance social work knowledge and practice.
SOCIAL SYSTEMS PERSPECTIvE
Our position is that all theories, at least in the human and behavioral sciences, start with a set of assumptions about humans and the world in which they live
We believe that the nine assumptions comprising the social systems tive are widely held by social workers and by social scientists generally
perspec-The order of the following assumptions suggests a hierarchy beginning with an assumption of the existence of a general order and ending with a fea-ture of that order evident in the generalist practice of social work (Pincus &
Minahan, 1973)
1 There is an underlying intelligible general order in the world
Sci-ence is predicated on this assumption with the scientific method being the approach to the discovery of the various features or characteristics
of this order
2 Social ordering is a dynamic and constant process that arises out of conditions existing in the environment The forms and common pat-
terns exhibited by all forms of human organization have their origins
in (a) the social and physical environment in which they are found and (b) the genetically based need structure found in all humans
3 All human social behavior is purposeful Our approach to knowledge
building starts with this assumption—social behavior is purposive havior and is conducted through social relationships This assumption holds for the social behavior of an individual as a member of a group, family, formal organization, or community
be-4 When fully developed, all forms of social organization display maintaining and development characteristics Social organizations go
self-through a development process and reach a stage at which they display self-maintaining characteristics
5 A social organization, when viewed as a whole, is greater than the sum of its parts The social organization is a whole consisting of func-
tionally related parts You cannot understand a social organization through disassembly
6 Well-being is the natural state of all humans and the various forms of social organization A state of well-being is characterized as a healthy
or harmonious balance that exists between the individual and that person’s social environment
7 All forms of social organization, when fully developed, can be acterized and studied as social systems Individuals, families, groups,
char-organizations, and communities are dynamic systems of interacting parts The functioning of these systems can only be understood in the context of the system’s environment
8 The social relationship is the principal structural unit of all social systems Knowledge about relationships and the ability to use the rela-
tionship define the social worker’s professional domain
Trang 409 Generalist practice is a formalization of a natural discovery process that has its origins in human relationships The basic tool of the gen-
eralist practitioner is the relationship We characterize the generalist practitioner as a system creator The helping process begins with estab-lishing a relationship with the client system This causes a new system
to be created and through the professional use of this new system, the helping process proceeds
With the nine assumptions as a backdrop, we can review general systems and ecological, functional, and symbolic interaction theories These four theo-
ries provide most of what we consider to be the conceptual foundations of
social systems theory
Our discussion starts with the person generally recognized as the major contributor or founder of each specific line of theory We will identify what
we consider to be the major assumptions and concepts associated with that
theory We believe that knowledge building is both personal and exciting; its
aim is to learn more about the world in which we live For the helping
profes-sional, the focus is on understanding why people behave as they do and on
developing ways of assisting people to live more personally satisfying and
so-cially useful lives
GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY
General systems theory emerged in the early twentieth century It was
pro-posed as a metatheory (a theory about theories) intended to shape the
construc-tion of theories in all fields of science (von Bertalanffy, 1968) General systems
theory arose in response to the perceived weaknesses of classical scientific
theory During the preceding years, the hard sciences (chemistry, physics, and
biology) had made remarkable advances, and all fields of intellectual inquiry
were influenced by the advances in these disciplines The hard sciences, in
contrast to the soft sciences such as social science, were characterized by the
precise measurement of phenomena, rigorous research methods, and
quantita-tive analysis The inevitable consequence was that the social sciences began to
imitate the precision of the hard sciences
During the 1920s, young Ludwig von Bertalanffy was beginning a career in theoretical biology His work would lead him and his son to develop innova-
tive methods in research with cancer cells However, it was von Bertalanffy’s
philosophical bent that would lead him to his major contribution
Ludwig von Bertalanffy was an Austrian, and very much the model of the European intellectual He had little time for frivolous interests His idea of a
good time was to listen to Mozart and Beethoven, or to settle down to read the
works of Goethe He was absorbed by his work, and was noted for his dark
sense of humor As a philosopher, he became convinced that empirical
reduc-tionism was a movement that missed the point of complex phenomena He
em-braced the notion of wholeness, and his goal was nothing less than to reshape
the focus of science
One trait of the hard sciences that facilitated the precision of methods and
measurement was called reductionism Reductionism was the proposition that
complex things can be understood by breaking them down into simple
com-ponents that can be analyzed and understood Precise measurement required
that the phenomena to be studied must be things that could be observed As a