Asessment of the leadership standards of the secondary school leaders in hai phong city basic for an intervention program

ASSESSMENT OF THE LEADERSHIP STANDARDS OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL LEADERS IN HAI PHONG CITY: BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION PROGRAM _ A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Southern Luzon State University, Lucban, Quezon, Philippines in Collaboration with Thai Nguyen University, Socialist Republic of Vietnam _ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management _ By NGUYEN THI DAT KHOA (LUCY) October 2014 i APPROVAL SHEET The Dissertation of NGUYEN THI DAT KHOA entitled ENHANCING THE COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGERS IN VINH PHUC PROVINCE: BASIS FOR A TRAINING PROGRAM Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT A program offered by Southern Luzon State University, Republic of the Philippines in collaboration with Thai Nguyen University, Socialist Republic of Vietnam has been approved by Oral Examination Committee SUSANA A SALVACION, PhD Expert APOLONIA A ESPINOSA, PhD Expert Expert BELLA R MUELLO, EdD External Panel CECILIA N GASCON, PhD Chairman Endorsed by: Recommended by: RICARYL CATHERINE P CRUZ, EdD Adviser SUSANA A SALVACION, Ph.D Dean, Graduate School Accepted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management WALBERTO A MACARAAN, Ed.D Vice President for Academic Affairs _ Date ii CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT Writing a doctoral dissertation is a gratifying but difficult and sometimes a nerve- wracking endeavor that only a few engage in because it requires a lot of sacrifice and hard work from the researcher However, at the end of the task, one experiences a wonderful feeling of joy, happiness, relief and fulfillment The researcher would like to extend her sincerest gratitude and thanks to the following people who were very instrumental in the completion of this research DR CECILIA N GASCON, President of the Southern Luzon State University in the Republic of the Philippines, for her untiring effort and belief that this collaboration is possible thus enabling her to pursue the Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management; DR DANG KIM VUI, President of Thai Nguyen in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, for his untiring effort and belief that this collaboration is worthy of implementation; DR NGUYEN THE HUNG, Director of the International Training Center, Thai Nguyen University of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, for his significant concern to provide the Vietnamese people an opportunity to grow through education; DR RICARYL CATHERINE P CRUZ, her adviser, for the guidance and endless support for the improvement of this study iv DR APOLONIA A ESPINOSA, DR WALBERTO A MACARAAN, DR BELLA R MUELLO, and DR TERESITA V DE LA CRUZ who composed the Oral Defense Committee, for their suggestions, comments and corrections to improve this study; ITC STAFF, for providing the necessary research materials; HER FAMILY and FRIENDS, for the love and support in one way or the other; And TO ALL who have contributed to make this study a success NTDK v DEDICATION I dedicate my dissertation work to my family and many friends A special feeling of gratitude to my loving parents I also dedicate this dissertation to my many friends and family who have supported me throughout the process I will always appreciate everything that they have done, especially Dr.Ricaryl Catherine Cruz, my adviser, for the guidance and endless support for the improvement of this study NTDK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TITLE PAGE ……………………………………………………………… i APPROVAL SHEET ……………………………………………………… ii CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY ……………………………………… iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ………………………………………………… iv DEDICATION ……………………………………………………………… vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………… vii LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………… ix LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………… xi LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………………………… xii ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………… xiii CHAPTER I II III INTRODUCTION …………………………………………… Background of the Study ………………………………… Objectives of the Study …………………………………… 10 Hypothesis of the Study …………………………………… 11 Significance of the Study ………………………………… 11 Scope and Limitation of the Study ……………………… 12 Definition of Terms ………………………………………… 13 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ……………………….……… 16 Conceptual Framework ………………… ….……… …… 34 Research Paradigm …………………………… ….……… 36 METHODOLOGY Locale of the Study ………………………….……………… 37 Research Design …………………………….……………… 37 Population and Sampling ………………….… ………… 38 Research Instrument ……………………… …….…….… 38 Validation of the Instrument ……………………………… 39 Data Gathering Procedure ………………………………… 40 vii IV Statistical Treatment …….………………………………… 41 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ……………………….… 43 Profile of Respondents …………………………………… 43 Perception of the Respondents on the Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City ………………………………………………………………… 52 Significant Difference on the Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City when V Grouped According to their Profile ……………………………… 63 ProposedIntervention Program ………………………………… 80 SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary…………………….…………………………….… 85 Findings ……………………………………………………… 86 Conclusions ……………………………………………….… 89 Recommendations …………………………………… …… 89 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………… 91 APPENDICES …………………………………………………………… 94 CURRICULUM VITAE …………………………………………………… 128 viii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE Scale of Values ………………………………………………… 39 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Age ………………………………………… 43 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profilein Terms of Gender …………………………………… 44 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Civil Status………………………………… 45 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Educational Attainment………………… 46 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Monthly Income …………………………… 47 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Length of Service ………………………… 48 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents' Profile in Terms of Length of Management Experience…… 49 Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in terms of Shared Vision 52 Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in Terms of Culture of Learning ………………………………………………………… 55 Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in Terms of Management 56 Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in Terms of Family and Community ……………………………………………………… 58 10 11 12 13 14 15 Perceived of the Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in Terms of Ethics …………………………………………………………… Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in Haiphong City in Terms of Societal Context …………………………………………………………… 62 Chi - Square Value of the Responses on Shared Vision as to Profile of Respondents ………………………………………… 64 ix 60 TABLE 16 17 18 19 20 PAGE Chi - Square Value of the Responses on Culture of Learning as to Profile of Respondents …………………………………… 66 Chi - Square Value of the Responses on Management as to Profile of Respondents ………………………………………… 69 Chi - Square Value the Responses on Family and Community as to the Profile of Respondents ………………… 72 Chi - Square Value the Responses on Ethics with the Profile of Respondents ………………………………………………… 75 Chi - Square Value of the Responses on Societal Context with Profile of Respondents …………………………………… 78 x 116 Q6 * Civil Status Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 918a 632 Likelihood Ratio 1.054 590 Linear-by-Linear 911 340 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (66.7%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 03 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 067 632 Cramer's V 067 203 632 N of Valid Cases Share vision* Educational Attainment Q1*Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.232a 156 Likelihood Ratio 5.990 112 Linear-by-Linear 3.777 052 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (50.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 81 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 161 156 Cramer's V 161 203 156 117 Q2 * Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 7.050a 632 Likelihood Ratio 8.061 528 Linear-by-Linear 2.777 096 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a 10 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 09 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 186 632 Cramer's V 108 203 632 N of Valid Cases Q3 * Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 7.380a 287 Likelihood Ratio 9.442 150 Linear-by-Linear 2.495 114 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (58.3%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 24 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 191 287 Cramer's V 135 203 287 118 Q4 * Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.759a 460 Likelihood Ratio 9.636 381 Linear-by-Linear 1.173 279 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a 11 cells (68.8%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 24 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 208 460 Cramer's V 120 203 460 N of Valid Cases Q5 * Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.750a 022 Likelihood Ratio 15.997 014 Linear-by-Linear 1.462 227 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (58.3%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 10 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 270 022 Cramer's V 191 203 022 119 Q6 * Educational Attainment Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.881a 437 Likelihood Ratio 6.407 379 Linear-by-Linear 2.635 105 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (66.7%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 01 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 170 437 Cramer's V 120 203 437 N of Valid Cases Share vision* Monthly Income Q1* Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.279a 351 Likelihood Ratio 3.608 307 Linear-by-Linear 837 360 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (25.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 40 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 127 351 Cramer's V 127 203 351 120 Q2 * Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 11.490a 244 Likelihood Ratio 13.350 147 Linear-by-Linear 2.067 150 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (43.8%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 04 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 238 244 Cramer's V 137 203 244 N of Valid Cases Q3 * Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.124a 660 Likelihood Ratio 4.593 597 Linear-by-Linear 1.159 282 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (25.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 12 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 143 660 Cramer's V 101 203 660 121 Q4 * Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.979a 639 Likelihood Ratio 7.496 586 Linear-by-Linear 451 502 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (25.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 12 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 185 639 Cramer's V 107 203 639 N of Valid Cases Q5 * Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.674a 461 Likelihood Ratio 6.201 401 Linear-by-Linear 245 620 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (50.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 05 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 167 461 Cramer's V 118 203 461 122 Q6 * Monthly Income Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.319a 634 Likelihood Ratio 4.912 555 Linear-by-Linear 726 394 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (50.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 00 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 146 634 Cramer's V 103 203 634 N of Valid Cases Share vision* Length of service Q1* Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.936a 415 Likelihood Ratio 4.034 401 Linear-by-Linear 2.252 133 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (20.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 2.02 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 139 415 Cramer's V 139 203 415 123 Q2 * Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.854a 12 250 Likelihood Ratio 16.081 12 188 Linear-by-Linear 3.172 075 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (40.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 22 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 271 250 Cramer's V 156 203 250 N of Valid Cases Q3 * Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 21.594a 006 Likelihood Ratio 22.450 004 Linear-by-Linear 1.276 259 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (33.3%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 59 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 326 006 Cramer's V 231 203 006 124 Q4 * Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.063a 12 780 Likelihood Ratio 9.383 12 670 Linear-by-Linear 386 534 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (30.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 59 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 199 780 Cramer's V 115 203 780 N of Valid Cases Q5 * Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.024a 431 Likelihood Ratio 9.554 298 Linear-by-Linear 293 588 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (46.7%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 25 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 199 431 Cramer's V 141 203 431 125 Q6 * Length of service Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 11.561a 172 Likelihood Ratio 11.553 172 Linear-by-Linear 746 388 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (46.7%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 02 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 239 172 Cramer's V 169 203 172 N of Valid Cases Share vision* Length of Management Experiences Q1* Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.194a 070 Likelihood Ratio 11.651 040 Linear-by-Linear 234 628 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (25.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 1.62 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 224 070 Cramer's V 224 203 070 126 Q2 * Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.803a 15 541 Likelihood Ratio 14.669 15 476 Linear-by-Linear 198 656 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is ,18 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 261 541 Cramer's V 151 203 541 N of Valid Cases Q3 * Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 23.189a 10 010 Likelihood Ratio 25.151 10 005 Linear-by-Linear 3.689 055 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (38.9%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 47 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 338 010 Cramer's V 239 203 010 127 Q4 * Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.431a 15 493 Likelihood Ratio 15.550 15 413 Linear-by-Linear 589 443 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 47 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal Value Approx Sig Phi 267 493 Cramer's V 154 203 493 N of Valid Cases Q5 * Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.762a 10 141 Likelihood Ratio 16.262 10 092 Linear-by-Linear 019 889 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a 10 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 20 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 270 141 Cramer's V 191 203 141 128 Q6 * Length of Management Experiences Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.919a 10 733 Likelihood Ratio 8.583 10 572 Linear-by-Linear 555 456 Association N of Valid Cases 203 a cells (50.0%) have expected count less than The minimum expected count is 02 Symmetric Measures Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases Value Approx Sig Phi 185 733 Cramer's V 131 203 733 129 CURRICULUM VITAE NGUYEN THI DATKHOA- LUCY Tel No 0313 619 973 CP No 0913 261 931 e-mail: nguyenthidatkhoa@gmail.com A PERSONAL DATA Name Present Address Home Address Birthdate Birthplace Gender Civil Status Nationality Languages Spoken : NGUYEN THI DATKHOA - LUCY : 38 Dong An St Thanh To Ward,HaiAnDistrict, HaiPhongCity : 38 Dong An St Thanh To Ward,HaiAnDistrict, HaiPhongCity : January 01, 1975 : HaiAnDistrict, HaiPhongCity : Female : Married : Vietnamese : Vietnamese B EDUCATION M.A : Thai Nguyen University - Vietnam Institute of Mathematics Tertiary : Ha Noi PedagogicalUniversity High School : Le Qui DonHigh School, Hai Phong City Secondary : Le Loi Secondary School, Ngo Quyen Elementary : Le Loi Elementary school, Ngo Quyen C WORK EXPERIENCE 9/1994 to 5/2003 DangLamSecondary School, An Hai, Hai Phong 130 5/2003 to 12/2007 Education Department of Hai An, Hai Phong 1/2008 to 12/2011 Education Department of Dương Kinh, Hai Phong 1/2012 to 4/2014 Committee of Hai Phong city D THE ARTICLE, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS Necessary Conditions for Efficiency in Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems – Journal of Science and Technique, N138(12 2010) - MilitaryTechnicalAcademy Applying the method of “combining individual activities and small group activities” in teaching mathematics at lower secondary level – Education Review N263 (6 – 2011) ... Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in terms of Shared Vision 52 Perceived Current Leadership Standards of the Secondary School Leaders in HaiPhong City in. .. study The input covers the respondents’ profile and the perceived leadership standards of the secondary school leaders in the Haiphong City; the process is grouping, finding the weaknesses of the. .. assess the current leadership standards of the secondary school leaders in Haiphong City A total of 203 leaders (principals) of secondary schools in Haiphong City were selected as the respondents of