Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 94 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
94
Dung lượng
1,07 MB
Nội dung
IN VITRO AND IN VIVO ASSESSMENTS OF PCL-TCP
COMPOSITIES FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING
WONG WAH JIE
(B. Eng. (Hons), NUS)
A THESIS SUBMITTED
FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
2010
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
A. Yeo, W. J. Wong, H. H. Khoo and S. H. Teoh “Surface modification of
PCL-TCP scaffolds improve interfacial mechanical interlock and enhance early
bone formation: An in vitro and in vivo characterization” Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research: Part A v. 92A, p. 311-321 (2010)
A. Yeo, W. J. Wong and S. H. Teoh “Surface modification of PCL-TCP
scaffolds in rabbit calvaria defects: Evaluation of scaffold degradation profile,
biomechanical properties and bone healing patterns” Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research: Part A v. 93A, p. 1358-1367 (2010)
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express his sincere gratitude and heartfelt thanks to
the following individuals who have rendered assistance or gave valuable
advice leading towards the successful accomplishment of this research project:
Professor Teoh Swee Hin (Dept of Mechanical Engineering), project
supervisor, for giving valuable advice and support through the project.
The author appreciates the trust and independence that has been given
to him.
Dr. Alvin Yeo (National Dental Centre), project co-supervisor, for his
constant supervision and guidance in this project. His active role in
coordinating and participating guarantees the success of this study.
Dr. Bina Rai (IMB), project mentor, for giving valuable pointers on the
project throughout the study despite her busy work schedule. The
author would like to thank her for reviewing the drafts.
Dr. Simon Cool (IMB), project mentor, for his suggestions given on the
progress of this project during presentations.
Richard Lin (3M), for his assistance in interferometery of composite
thin films.
Dr Amber Sawyyer and Ivy See Hoo, for their assistance in histology
and histomorphometry work.
ii
Mr Low Chee Wah and Mr Abdul Malik Bin Baba (Impact Mechanics
Lab), for rendering support and assistance on Instron micro tester for
mechanical testing.
Ms Irene Kee (Dept of Experimental Surgery, SGH), for her valuable
assistance and support during animal surgeries and taking care for
them after implantations.
Everyone at VNSC and BIOMAT, for their encouragement and
laughter throughout the whole period, which fills up the entire
durations with wonderful memories.
60 rabbits (R2 to R24) that have been sacrificed in this project till now.
They did not have a choice but it is them that made everything possible.
And last but not least, to ALL those who has contributed in one way or
another in this project.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS.................................................. i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................... iv
SUMMARY............................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................... x
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION..............................................................................1
1.1
BACKGROUND .........................................................................................1
1.1.1
Current trends in BTE .........................................................................1
1.1.2
Limitations of current treatments for bone defects ..........................2
1.1.3
Strategies in BTE ..................................................................................3
1.2
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES..........................................................................6
1.3
RESEARCH SCOPE ....................................................................................7
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................8
2.1
BONE PHYSIOLOGY .................................................................................8
2.2
BIOMATERIALS.......................................................................................11
2.2.1
Polycaprolactone (PCL) ....................................................................11
2.2.2
Biodegradation ..................................................................................12
2.2.3
Tri-Calcium Phosphate (TCP) ..........................................................14
2.2.4
PCL-TCP scaffolds .............................................................................14
2.2.5
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP-2) ...........................................17
2.2.6
Heparin...............................................................................................20
CHAPTER 3: EFFECTS OF POROSITIES OF PCL-TCP SCAFFOLDS ON BONE
REGENERATION, SCAFFOLD DEGRADATION AND MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES. ..........................................................................................................23
3.1
INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................23
3.2
MATERIALS AND METHODS...............................................................26
3.2.1
Scaffold Fabrication ...........................................................................26
iv
3.2.2
Porosity Calculation ..........................................................................26
3.2.3
Experimental Design .........................................................................26
3.2.4
Animal husbandry and scaffold implantation ................................27
3.2.5
Micro-CT analysis ..............................................................................29
3.2.6
Mechanical strength testing ..............................................................30
3.2.7
Histological Analysis ........................................................................31
3.2.8
Histomorphometric Analysis ...........................................................31
3.2.9
Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) ......................................................32
3.2.10
Statistical Analysis .............................................................................33
3.3
RESULTS ...................................................................................................33
3.3.1
Scaffolds characterisations ................................................................33
3.3.2
µ-CT analysis .....................................................................................34
3.3.3
Compressive strength .......................................................................37
3.3.4
Push Out test ......................................................................................38
3.3.5
Histology ............................................................................................39
3.3.6
Histomorphometric Analysis ...........................................................40
3.3.7
Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) ......................................................41
3.4
DISCUSSIONS ..........................................................................................42
3.5
CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................49
CHAPTER 4: PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF PCL-TCP SCAFFOLDS AS
CO-DELIVERY SYSTEMS FOR HEPARIN AND BMP-2 IN VITRO..................51
4.1
INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................51
4.2
MATERIALS AND METHODS...............................................................53
4.2.1
Porcine osteoblasts culture ...............................................................53
4.2.2
Cell culture and BMP-2 treatment ...................................................53
4.2.3
Heparin and BMP-2 treatment .........................................................54
4.2.4
Protein determination .......................................................................54
4.2.5
Alkaline phosphatase activity ..........................................................55
4.2.6
Western blot .......................................................................................55
4.2.7
Alizarin red staining..........................................................................55
v
4.2.8
Release profile studies .......................................................................56
4.2.9
BMP-2 Release....................................................................................56
4.2.10
Statistical Analysis .............................................................................56
4.3
RESULTS ...................................................................................................57
4.3.1
Optimal BMP-2 concentration ..........................................................57
4.3.2
Western blot analysis ........................................................................58
4.3.3
Alizarin red staining..........................................................................59
4.3.4
Optimal heparin concentration ........................................................59
4.3.5
Protein release profile .......................................................................60
4.3.6
BMP-2 release profile ........................................................................61
4.3.7
ALP bioactivity of eluted BMP-2 ......................................................62
4.4
DISCUSSIONS ..........................................................................................62
4.5
CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................67
CHAPTER 5: FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................68
5.1
Effects of porosities of PCL-TCP scaffolds on in vivo bone
regeneration. ....................................................................................................68
5.2
Preliminary in vitro evaluation of PCL-TCP scaffolds as co-delivery
systems for heparin and BMP-2 .........................................................................68
BIBLIOGRAPHY .....................................................................................................70
APPENDIX (PUBLICATIONS) .............................................................................82
vi
SUMMARY
This project consists of two chapters and revolves around PCL—TCP
composite scaffolds.
Pore size and porosity has always been an important property which
affects cell and tissue infiltration. This has direct influence on bone
regeneration and scaffold degradation upon implantation. In this study,
acellular scaffolds of varying pore size and porosity were left in rabbit calvaria
defects and explanted at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. Porosities (Group A: 74.9 ±
1.7%, Group B: 86.7 ± 0.2%) and pore size (Group A: 500 ± 73µm, Group B: 723
± 92µm) were determined through Micro CT. %BV/TV from Micro CT
demonstrated an increase up to 8 week and stabilizes thereafter. Power law
relationship governed scaffold degradation rate regardless of porosity. Group
B scaffolds (6 weeks) reached 50% scaffold loss faster than Group A (10
weeks). Mechanical properties between both groups were comparable
throughout the study. Lastly, histology and histomorphometry detected bone
formation and active vascularisation in all defects. In summary, porosities and
pore size of PCL-TCP scaffolds has negligible effects on bone regeneration and
scaffold degradation.
Chapter 4 focused on the effects of BMP-2 and heparin on pig
osteoblasts. Porcine osteoblasts obtained through explant culture displayed
highest ALP activity in the presence of 100ng/ml of BMP-2 and 300ng/ml of
vii
heparin. Alizarin red staining and western blot confirmed the bioactivity of
BMP-2 used. Protein release from Group D scaffolds has a biphasic release
similar to Group B. This is in agreement with BMP-2 release profile. ALP
activities of various groups were comparable mainly due to low concentration
of eluted BMP-2. In conclusion, heparin and BMP-2 has demonstrated its
potential as co delivery system in this preliminary study. More studies should
be carried out to confirm the hypothesis.
viii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Physical parameters of PCL-TCP scaffolds
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1:
Diagram showing skeletal long bone structure which comprises
of cortical and trabecular bone (Biomedical Tissue Research
Group, 1996)
Figure 2.2
Schematic diagram showing stages of bone remodelling process
(Biomedical Tissue Research Group, 2007)
Figure 2.3:
Chemical Structure of PCL polymer (Wikipedia, 2006)
Figure 2.4
Chemical structure of tricalcium phosphate (CambridgeSoft
Corporation, 2004)
Figure 2.5:
Activation of SMAD proteins after BMP mediation (Sakou, 1998)
Figure 2.6:
Chemical structure of Heparin (Gray et al., 2008)
Figure 3.1:
Micro CT images of scaffolds before implantation (A) Group A
(B) Group B
Figure 3.2:
Implantation of scaffolds into rabbit calvarial defects
Figure 3.3:
Calculation of interlabel distances using Bioquant Image
Analysis® software
Figure 3.4:
Representative µ-CT images of explants specimens with PCLTCP scaffold of (A) 75% porosity (B) 85% porosity (blue: scaffold,
yellow: new bone growth and beige: calvaria bone)
Figure 3.5:
Percentage BV/TV in PCL-TCP scaffolds by µ-CT with varying
porosities from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation.
Figure 3.6:
Scaffold volumes with varying porosities over a time period of 24
weeks.
Figure 3.7:
Percentage of PCL-TCP scaffolds volume loss with varying
porosities from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation
Figure 3.8:
Compressive strength of PCL-TCP scaffolds with varying
porosities from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation (* denotes p < 0.05)
Figure 3.9:
Shear strength of PCL-TCP scaffolds with varying porosities
from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation (* denotes p < 0.05)
x
Figure 3.10: Representative images of ex vivo specimens at (A) 4 weeks (B) 8
weeks stained for Goldner’s Trichome (green sections:
mineralised bone; areas labelled ‘S’ denote PCL-TCP scaffolds)
Figure 3.11: Percentage BV/TV of PCL-TCP scaffolds by histomorphometry
with varying porosities from 8 to 24 weeks of implantation
Figure 3.12: Representative image showing diffused flurochrome labels
between 2 and 8 weeks (red label – alizarin, green label – calcein)
Figure 3.13: Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) of PCL-TCP scaffolds with
varying porosities from 8 to 24 weeks of implantation
Figure 4.1:
Alkaline phosphatase activity per mg protein of cells at different
BMP-2 concentrations (* denotes p < 0.05)
Figure 4.2:
Western blot for pig osteoblasts treated with 100ng/ml BMP-2 at
different treatment times. (top - phosphorylated SMAD 1/5/8 and
bottom – Total SMAD 1/5/8)
Figure 4.3:
Alizarin red staining for pig osteoblasts with and without BMP-2
(control) treatment for 3 weeks.
Figure 4.4:
Alkaline phosphatase activity per unit protein of cells at different
BMP-2 and/or heparin concentrations (* denotes p < 0.05)
Figure 4.5:
Amount of total protein release at various time points (Group A:
PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with PBS. Group B: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 100ng/ml BMP-2. Group C: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin. Group D: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2)
Figure 4.6:
Amount of BMP-2 release at various time points. (Group B: PCLTCP scaffolds loaded with 100ng/ml BMP-2. Group D: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2) Group A and C showed no release of BMP-2 at all time points.
Figure 4.7:
Bioactivity of eluted BMP-2 at different time points (Group A:
PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with PBS. Group B: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 100ng/ml BMP-2. Group C: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin. Group D: PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2)
xi
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND
This chapter aims to give the reader an overview of the current trends in
bone tissue engineering (BTE). Following that, limitations of available
treatments for bone defects and various strategies of BTE will be discussed.
1.1.1
Current trends in BTE
Healthcare spending in US can be represented by National Health
Expenditure (NHE). It is defined as the “total amount spent to purchase
healthcare goods and services as well as investment in the medical sector to
produce healthcare services”(NHED, 2006). NHE has been rising rapidly
throughout the years from $153 billion in 1976 to $1990 billion in 2006 (NHED,
2006). Healthcare comprises of 16% of GDP in 2006 and is expected to increase
to 19% in a decade. Average annual growth of healthcare expenses involving
musculoskeletal conditions is ranked second at 8.5% (HCUP, 2006). The huge
growth can be attributed to the rapidly aging population. Also, more highimpact accidents have led to an increase in serious limb trauma. Bone and Joint
decade (2000-2010) was set up by United Nations and World Health
Organisation to raise awareness of the growing costs and also to deepen
understanding of musculoskeletal diseases through research (BJD, 2000-2010).
1
In Singapore, Government Health Expenditure/Total Government Expenditure
increased from 6.5 to 7.1% between 2006 to 2008 (MOH, 2008).
1.1.2
Limitations of current treatments for bone defects
For surgical procedures involving bone grafts, patients usually suffer
from trauma-related injuries or bone fractures. Currently, the gold standard
for bone grafts is autologous bone commonly taken from iliac crest.
Autologous bone are bones extracted from another part of patient’s own body
(Casey K C, 2006). The drawbacks include an additional surgery site for
harvesting and limited availability (Enneking et al., 1980). Other types of bone
grafts include tissues taken from human donors (allografts) or xenografts
obtained from animals. Allografts are not as popular due to the increased risk
of disease transmission, high cost, graft rejection (Gitelis and Saiz, 2002), and
the acceptance of xenografts in certain races or religion may be highly
controversial due to its animal origin. Allografts which have undergone
chemical treatment to remove minerals are known as demineralised bone
matrix. Collagen and other growth factors are still being retained but they
have low mechanical strength due to loss of minerals. Even though it is widely
used as bone substitute, its effectiveness fluctuates in different patients
(Drosos et al., 2007; Kay, 2007). Large clinical defects resulting from bone
cancer or trauma are currently treated with titanium plates. This may lead to
2
complications like rejection and stress shielding. In serious cases, revision
surgery has to be conducted to replace the implant. oLimitations to current
bone grafts as discussed propel researchers to look into the field of bone tissue
engineering for an ideal bone substitute.
1.1.3
Strategies in BTE
Tissue engineering is the restoration, improvement, maintenance and
substitution of damaged tissues and organs using principles of biology and
engineering (Langer and Vacanti, 1993). BTE consists of an interplay of
scaffold technology, growth factors and cells. In this thesis, the focus will be on
using composite scaffold technology in enhancing bone regeneration through
in vitro and in vivo studies.
Scaffold intended for BTE should possess the following properties:
1. High porosity and pore interconnectivity to allow cell growth,
migration and promote vascularisation (Sundelacruz and Kaplan, 2009).
2. Biocompatible, bioresorbable and controllable degradation rate to
match surrounding tissue growth.
3. Suitable surface topography whereby cells are able to attach, proliferate
and differentiate (Stevens et al., 2008).
3
4. Mechanical properties that closely resemble the defect site and has the
strength to withstand load upon implantation (Hutmacher D.W, 2001).
5. The ability to impregnate cells, growth factors and drugs which can
trigger surrounding cells for bone regeneration; controlled drug or
growth factor delivery can also be effectively targeted at the defect site.
6. Ease of manufacturing is necessary for the scaffold to be mass
produced.
7. Customizability of the shape and size of scaffold will be favourable for
use in different clinical applications (Jones, 2005).
It must be noted that interdependent relationships exist among the desired
properties discussed above. One example is when the porosity of scaffold is
increased, cells are able to infiltrate easily but mechanical strength will
decrease. Scaffold degradation time will also shorten due to lower scaffold
volume. This particular scaffold may be suitable for non load bearing
anatomical sites but not for the reverse.
In this study, PCL-TCP composites were selected as the delivery
vehicle. Hydrophobic nature of PCL is improved by adding bioactive TCP
particles. Mechanical strength of composite is increased as TCP scaffolds are
originally brittle. Furthermore, PCL-TCP composites have shown to be
biocompatible, controlled degradation rate and effective delivery systems for
growth factors (Rai et al., 2005b; Yeo et al., 2008a).
4
Growth factors are “secreted by a wide range of cell types to transmit
signals that activate specific developmental programs controlling cell
migration, differentiation and proliferation” (Chen and Mooney, 2003). They
transmit signals by attaching onto receptors on the cell surface. Signals will
then be passed through the cell membrane and results in the expression of a
target gene. This process is extremely complex and may involve multiple
growth factors and receptors for one particular signal (Johnson et al., 1988;
Pimentel, 1994). Some of the highly researched osteoinductive growth factors
include Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP-2), Transforming growth factor-β
(TGF-β), Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). BMP-2 is arguably the most potent
osteoinductive growth factor and will be elaborated on in the next chapter
(Bessa et al., 2008b). FGF stimulates neo-angiogenesis, indirectly augmenting
bone regeneration by providing necessary nutrients to the core of defect site
(Hurley et al., 1993; Rifkin and Moscatelli, 1989). IGF enhances the proliferation
of osteoblasts ,osteoclasts and mineralisation (Khan et al., 2000). PDGF exhibits
stimulatory effects on osteoblasts proliferation (Canalis et al., 1989) especially
in bone fracture healing (Andrew et al., 1995).
Drug delivery system (DDS) is a “technology that enables biological
signalling molecules to enhance in vivo therapeutic efficacy by combination
with biomaterials”(Tabata, 2005). Growth factors cannot be applied to the
5
defect site in solution because they will immediately diffuse away from the
defect site. In addition, direct injection of growth factors at high doses has been
shown to generate undesirable results (Yancopoulos et al., 2000). Negative
feedback at high levels has been shown to induce heterotopic bone formation
(Paramore et al., 1999) and even resulted in formation of antibodies in clinical
trials (Walker and Wright, 2002). Here, a carrier is needed to ensure sustained
delivery of a growth factor at the defect site. The release profile of the growth
factor from the vehicle shall usually be gradual and controllable spatially and
temporally to ensure maximum therapeutic effects (Chen and Mooney, 2003).
1.2
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The general aim in this thesis was to evaluate and improve on the current
properties of PCL-TCP composites from various aspects namely porosity and
cell modulators in both in vitro and in vivo environments.
The two specific aims of this research was
1. To investigate the effects of bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and
mechanical properties of PCL-TCP scaffolds with different porosities in
vivo.
2. To evaluate the effects of heparin on BMP-2 release and bioactivity from
PCL-TCP scaffolds in vitro.
6
1.3
RESEARCH SCOPE
In the first chapter, two different groups of scaffolds were randomly placed in
rabbit calvaria defects and sacrificed after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. [Group A:
~75% porosity, Group B: ~82% porosity]. Upon sacrifice, at each interval, the
specimens
were
subjected
to
µ-CT
analysis,
mechanical
test
and
histomorphometric analysis. This will enable us to determine the effects of
porosity differences on bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and
mechanical integrity.
The final chapter firstly examined the effectiveness of BMP-2 and heparin
on pig osteoblasts in enhancing osteoblast differentiation. Pig osteoblasts was
chosen to simulate implantation conditions which is in line with our future
plan to assess the co-delivery system in a porcine model. Optimal
concentration of both BMP-2 and heparin was then determined and adapted
for subsequent analysis. Release profile of BMP-2 from PCL-TCP scaffolds was
plotted for signs of sustained delivery when immersed in PBS solution.
Heparin was chosen to improve binding and regulate release of BMP-2 here
and concurrently act as a framework for binding of endogenous growth factors
upon implantation.
7
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
BONE PHYSIOLOGY
In order to regenerate bone using BTE techniques, the understanding of the
structure and cells which participate in bone repair is of utmost importance.
Bone is composed of around 70-90% of minerals with the rest in the form of
proteins. Within the proteins in bone, the ratio of collagenous to noncollagenous stands at 9:1. This is in stark contrast with other tissues consisting
of only 10% collagenous proteins (Gokhale et al., 2001). High strength and
rigidity of the bone stem is attributed to its mineral component, which is
similar to hydroxyapatite (Ca 10 (PO 4 )(OH) 2 ). Bone has an elastic nature and it is
also resistant to tension due to the high amount of collagen fibres.
In Figure 2.1, there are two layers of bone namely: cortical (compact) and
trabecular (spongy) bone. Cortical bone surrounds the outer layer of bone with
thick and compact walls. It houses the medullary cavity where bone marrow
resides during life. Trabecular bone, which has a spongy honeycomb structure,
is only located at the epiphysis ends of long bone. Haematopoietic bone
marrow also resides within the pores of trabecular network. With the
exception of the articulating surfaces, the cortical bone is surrounded by the
periosteum which is a thin layer of connective tissue made of a collagen rich
layer and osteoprogenitor cells.
8
Figure 2.3: Diagram showing skeletal long bone structure which comprises of
cortical and trabecular bone (Biomedical Tissue Research Group, 1996)
There are a wide variety of cells that participate in the bone remodelling
and regeneration process (Figure 2.2).
The main duty of osteoclasts is to
remove and resorb bone. When osteoclasts determine a bone site to be
resorbed, it will create a barrier on its surface using its apical membrane. The
pH level beneath osteoclast will be decreased, which triggers the formation of
hydrogen ions and lysomal enzymes. After the resorption phase, Howship’s
lacuna, which is a depression with ruffled border, is created (Raisz and
Seeman, 2001).
9
Figure 2.4: Schematic diagram showing stages of bone remodelling process
(Biomedical Tissue Research Group, 2007)
In the renewal phase, macrophages are present at resorbed site.
Osteoblasts, which had the ability to synthesis new bone, will continue to
mineralise. During this process, it maintains and develops various channels
with surrounding cells to facilitate various cellular actions through receptors
and transmembrane proteins. When osteoblasts have completed the bone
formation process, it will experience multiple transformations. It can convert
itself into bone lining cells, which cover bone surfaces after quinesence phase.
Some osteoblasts may be programmed to die after fulfilling its duties. The rest
will become osteocytes and reside in bone matrix. Osteocytes are classified as
mature osteoblasts and will not mineralise any further (Lian J 1999).
10
2.2
BIOMATERIALS
2.2.1
Polycaprolactone (PCL)
Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is a semi crystalline resorbable polyester.
PCL belong to aliphatic polyester family and thus share similar properties
with other members such as polyglycolide (PGA) and polylactide (PLA). It has
a low melting point of between 59 to 64°C, depending on its level of
crystallinity. Low melting temperature enhances its processibility. It has a low
glass transition temperature of around -60°C which explains its ductile and
rubbery state at room temperature (Juan Pena, 2006).
PCL has a higher decomposition temperature (350°C) relative to other
aliphatic polyesters which will decompose between 235°C and 255°C. PCL also
possess favorable mechanical properties: Elastic modulus between 300 to
400MPa which matches the stiffness of cancellous bone (100 – 300MPa) and a
tensile strength which ranges from 15 to 60MPa (Zein I, 2002).
Figure 2.3: Chemical Structure of PCL polymer (Wikipedia, 2006)
Each monomer of PCL consists of five methylene groups and one ester group.
PCL is hydrophobic due to the presence of non polar methylene groups
11
(Figure 2.3). Aliphatic ester linkage in PCL makes it susceptible to hydrolytic
degradation.
Low glass transition temperature contributes to the high permeability of
PCL. It is this property that allows PCL to form copolymer blends with other
polymers. PCL is widely used in its copolymer state in controlled release drug
delivery applications (James M Pachence, 2000). PCL is an FDA approved
material used widely in biomedical applications eg in sutures (Rezwan K,
2006).
2.2.2
Biodegradation
The degradation mechanism of polymers used for bone tissue
regeneration must be elucidated thoroughly before the product can be released
into the market. The degradation profile of the scaffold will have a significant
effect on the mechanical properties and various cellular activities that include
host tissue response (Y. Lei, 2007). If the scaffold degrades well before
sufficient bone regeneration take place, implant failure may result. Conversely,
if the scaffold fails to degrade fast enough, it will act as a barrier and hinder
new bone formation. PCL degrades completely in vitro and vivo to release
harmless by-products. This is one advantage that PCL possess which make it
highly suitable for use in medical devices. Unlike PCL, PLGA degrades upon
implantation to form acidic byproducts which is toxic to the body and will
affect cell growth and proliferation directly (Hak-Joon Sung, 2004).
12
The process of polymer degradation at different pH has been
scrutinized by Burkersrodaa et al. The study concluded that polymer can
either break down by surface erosion or bulk degradation. The mechanism of
degradation is dependent on three factors: 1. size of matrix, 2. water diffusivity
into scaffold centre, 3. rate of degradation of polymer reactive groups
(A.S.Htay, 2004; Friederike von Burkersrodaa, 2002). PCL follows a two step
degradation process when it is placed in an in vivo environment. The first step
is a non-enzymatic, random hydrolytic ester cleavage which is triggered
automatically by carboxyl end groups of the polymer chain. Chemical
structure and molecular weight of polymer will affect the duration of the first
step of degradation. When the molecular weight of polymer decreases to about
5000, second step of degradation will commence. The rate of chain scission and
weight of polymer decreases as a result of the formation and removal of short
chains of oligomers from the scaffold matrix. Fragmentation of polymer
precedes the absorption and digestion of polymer particles by phagocytes or
enzymes (C.G Pitt, 1981; Vert, 2002).
13
2.2.3
Tri-Calcium Phosphate (TCP)
Figure 2.4: Chemical structure of tricalcium phosphate (CambridgeSoft
Corporation, 2004)
TCP is a biocompatible and biodegradable material used widely and
successfully for bone replacement for many years. Some forms of calcium
phosphates include: mono-, di- and tetra calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite
and β-whitlockie. The ideal Ca/P ratio is 1.6, which is similar to
hydroxyapatite. The higher the Ca/P ratio, the more stable the compound will
be in solutions (Lakes, 2007). TCP is found naturally in the inorganic phase of
bone in form of hydroxyapatite. TCP is also responsible for the hardness of
bone, dentine and enamel. TCP exhibit excellent regenerative activity when
placed in vivo (Beruto et al., 2000). However, it has poor mechanical properties
such as low compressive strength. This contributed to its brittleness when
fabricated in blocks and scaffolds (K A Hing, 1998).
2.2.4
PCL-TCP scaffolds
The purpose of using composites for medical applications usually is to
reduce drawbacks of individual materials and the benefits of both are
14
combined together. Here, PCL is highly hydrophobic which leads to a longer
degradation period (>2 years) in vitro and in vivo. TCP alone, when fabricated
into a scaffold is brittle and weak in strength. By using PCL-TCP scaffolds for
guided bone regeneration, the above disadvantages will be minimized.
Previous research has showed that adding TCP to PCL by physically blending
to produce composite scaffold, the degradation rate of PCL can be accelerated.
In particular, under accelerated hydrolytic conditions of 5M NaOH, PCL-TCP
scaffolds completely degrades at 48 hrs where PCL scaffolds require 6 weeks
for degradation to complete (Christopher XF Lam, 2007). Our research team
found that PCL-TCP scaffolds degrade to 40% by weight when it was
immersed in standard culture media after six months. Recalling that the
optimal degradation rate of scaffolds intended for dentoalveolar defects is
about five to six months, the need for accelerated degradation propels our
team to look into the possibility of alkaline and enzymatic degradation (Yeo et
al., 2008a). 3M NaOH produced a more favourable surface morphology for
bone regeneration relative to lipase treated PCL-TCP scaffolds. Alkaline
treated scaffolds have a slower and more predictable degradation profile;
whereas lipase treated ones have lower mechanical properties at each
treatment point (Yeo et al., 2008b).
Selective surface modification can be used to improve the surface
hydrophilicity and pore morphology of biodegradable polyester scaffolds
15
without affecting the core of the rods. It was reported that cellular adhesion
and proliferation are closely dependent on the topographical nature of the
biomaterial surface (Boyan BD, 1995). An increase in surface area or roughness
of scaffold matrices enhanced osteoblast response, which lead to improved
osteoconductivity (Brett PM, 2004; Price RL, 2004). We showed that after
NaOH treatment, surface wettability of PCL-TCP scaffolds increased
significantly but the overall pore dimensions and honeycomb structure
remains unaffected. Scaffolds subjected to longer alkaline treatments exhibited
larger and deeper micro pits sizes, thus increasing the surface area to volume
ratio favourable for better cell adhesion and bone growth (Yeo et al., 2010).
PCL-TCP scaffolds had also been investigated as a delivery vehicle for
BMP-2. In the novel DDS, fibrin sealant and BMP-2 were loaded onto PCLTCP scaffolds and their elution profile and bioactivity in different stages were
analysed. Even though loading efficiency of PCL-TCP scaffolds stood at 43%,
they were more uniformly distributed as compared with PCL scaffolds. PCLTCP scaffolds when loaded with 20µg/ml exhibit a triphasic release profile
which had a delayed release profile than PCL scaffolds. BMP-2 also retained
its bioactivity upon release at all time points (Rai et al., 2007; Rai et al., 2005b).
PCL-TCP scaffolds have also proved to be a suitable delivery system for
platelet-rich plasma as demonstrated by its sustained release in PBS and
simulated body fluid (Rai et al., 2007).
16
2.2.5
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP-2)
It has been discovered a century ago that bone has excellent regenerative
capabilities. Ectopic bone formation was induced using decalcified bone or
injected bone extracts in one of the earliest study on bone regeneration (Senn,
1889). The breakthrough came about when Marshall Urist discovered that
bone formed at ectopic sites in rodents upon addition of proteins extracted
from demineralised bone matrix. He named the protein “Bone Morphogenetic
Proteins (BMP)” as its regenerative capability closely matched inherent bone
repair process (Urist, 1965).
BMP consists of a long hydrophobic stretch between 50-100 amino acids in
length. BMP-2, prior to cell secretion, is made up of signal peptide, prodomain and mature peptide. Upon secretion, the signal peptide is cleaved
(Xiao et al., 2007). BMP-2 belongs to the superfamily of transforming growth
factor (TGF)-β. Members in the family mainly have roles in bone and cartilage
development. Some other functions of BMPs include heart development
(Callis et al., 2005; Simic and Vukicevic, 2005) and kidney formation (Simic and
Vukicevic, 2005). There exists a heparin binding site in N-terminal region of
mature BMP-2 polypeptide. In pioneering work by Ruppert in 1996, it was
shown that BMP-2 activity was increased upon interactions with heparins
present in ECM. In the presence of N terminus of BMP-2 and heparin, there is
a five-fold increased in bioactivity (Ruppert et al., 1996). This lead to various
studies on heparin effects on BMP-2 in mind of effective bone regeneration.
17
BMP signalling is important for morphogenesis to occur at a cellular level
initially. There are two types of receptors: BMPR-1 and BMPR-2. Both have to
work together for the signalling process. After BMP has bound itself strongly
to the heteromeric complex of receptors, Smads proteins are activated
instantaneously. Smads are nuclear effector proteins that are part of signalling
pathway in BMP signalling cascades. There are three different groups of
Smads: Common mediated Smads (C-Smads) – Smad 4, Receptor regulated
Smads (R-Smads) – Smad 1, 5, 8 and inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) – Smad 6 and
7. In Figure 2.5, following the adhesion of BMP-2 to BMPR-1 receptor,
phosphylation of R-Smads will be follow. Phosphylated R-smads will form
heteromeric complex with Smad 4 and be translocated into the nucleus.
Transcription of target gene occurs in the presence of transcription factors and
heteromeric complex. Signalling is regulated by inhibitory Smad 6/7
(Vukicevic and Sampath, 2008).
18
Figure 2.5: Activation of SMAD proteins after BMP mediation (Sakou, 1998)
However, BMP-2 has several disadvantages. It degrades rapidly in vivo
(Yamamoto et al., 2003). Excessive dosages of BMP-2 were shown to trigger
bone formation away from defect site (Valentin-Opran et al., 2002).
Furthermore, subsequent administrations of BMP-2 will be costly. Hence, for
BMP-2 to function effectively in treatment of bone defects, more need to be
done in the following areas (Bessa et al., 2008a):
1. Optimised variables for clinical translation.
2. Good carrier biocompatibility and biodegradability.
3. Efficient BMP-2 loading method.
4.
Sustained released targeted at defect site.
5. Bioactivity of eluted BMP-2 maintained.
19
2.2.6
Heparin
The discovery of heparin occurred in John Hopkins University in 1916.
While researching on the cause of blood clotting, Jay McLean accidentally
collected substances that inhibit clotting. It was named heparin thereafter.
Following this discovery, more efforts were targeted at understanding the
structure of heparin. The first commercialisation of bovine lung and porcine
intestinal heparin was carried out in Toronto and Stockholm.
Figure 2.6: Chemical structure of Heparin (Gray et al., 2008)
Heparin
is
glycosaminoglycan
a
sulphated
(GAG)
family
polysaccharide
(Figure
2.6).
which
They
belongs
are
to
linear
heteropolysaccharides that alternates between glucosamine and iduronic acid
(Lever and Page, 2002). It is one of the most negatively charged molecules
relative to its small size. Sulfates and carboxylates groups contributed to the
high net negative charge (Caughey, 2003). Size of low molecular weight
heparin used in this study varies from 2-10kD. Heparin is mainly found in
mast or granulated cells in various organs. Heparin is also widely used as an
anticoagulant in the treatment of stroke and coronary artery disease.
20
There are heparin binding sites in some growth factors which played an
important role in their modulation of cell activities. It has been shown that
heparin binds strongly to proteins with highly positive-charged binding sites.
However, heparin sulphates favoured sites where basic residues are far apart
from each other (Fromm et al., 1997). Aside from the usual ionic bonding,
heparin also interacts with proteins through hydrogen bonding and
hydrophobic forces (Bae et al., 1994). Heparin and heparan sulphates are
structurally 70% similar to each other. Heparan sulphates are less sulphated
and thus have a lower overall negative charge than heparin. Even though they
are made up of same units, heparan sulphates have a higher glucosamine and
lower iduronic acid component (Lever and Page, 2002). Despite the
differences, heparin has been used widely as a model for the costly heparan
sulphate.
Heparin has been demonstrated to possess binding affinities for growth
factors including VEGF and BMP-2 (Ruppert et al., 1996). As a result, heparin
has been incorporated into biomaterials for the purpose of binding to
endogenous growth factors (Nillesen et al., 2007; Steffens et al., 2004). Heparin
has been shown previously to enhance osteoblast differentiation through BMP2 activity in vitro (Ruppert et al., 1996). In a recent study, it was reported that
heparin prolonged BMP-2 degradation by 20-folds in culture medium. In
21
addition, higher bone mineral density was observed in subcutaneous implants
when both heparin and BMP-2 were present (Zhao et al., 2006).
22
CHAPTER 3: EFFECTS OF POROSITIES OF PCL-TCP
SCAFFOLDS ON BONE REGENERATION, SCAFFOLD
DEGRADATION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES.
3.1
INTRODUCTION
As highlighted in chapter 1, shortcomings of current bone grafts motivate
researchers to look into polymeric scaffolds for better substitutes. Important
characteristics for a scaffold to function effectively as bone void filler at defect
sites include: 1) Highly porous and well connected pores to facilitate cellular
and vascular infiltration. 2) Biodegradable and predictable degradation profile
which coincides with surrounding tissue growth. 3) Surface characteristics that
allows for greater osteoblast attachment and function. 4) Mechanical
properties that is similar to defect site and is able to withstand load right after
implantation. 5) Easy loading of cells and proteins that are able to induce bone
regeneration. (Hutmacher et al., 2001; Jones, 2005; Temenoff and Mikos, 2000).
In this chapter, we will focus on the porosity of scaffold. Pores are a
necessary feature in scaffolds as they allow for cellular migration and
proliferation. Porosity of a scaffold is defined as the ratio of voids to the
overall volume occupied by the scaffold. Porosity and pore size of a scaffold
are closely interrelated with each other. Scaffolds with higher porosity will
have larger pore size provided that they remained constant throughout. These
are structural properties of scaffolds which is independent of the material. In
23
addition, it determines the flow of nutrients and metabolic wastes through the
scaffold (Kuboki et al., 1998).
Optimal pore size has always been highly debated amongst researchers. A
wide range of pore sizes from 10 – 600 µm have been tested in BTE with
porosities from 43 to 87.5% (El-Ghannam, 2004; Lickorish et al., 2004; Roy et
al., 2003; Zhang and Zhang, 2002). New bone growth was observed in all
defects in above studies. Noteworthy, scaffolds with engineered channels
exhibited larger new bone area compared to non porous ones and those that
were left unfilled (Roy et al., 2003). It has been previously shown that direct
osteogenesis was seen in pore sizes larger than ~300µm due to increased
vascularisation. Conversely, osteochondral ossification was facilitated when
pore size falls below 300µm (Gotz et al., 2004; Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005;
Kuboki et al., 2001; Tsuruga et al., 1997). Thus, it can be seen that porosity and
pore size has a great influence on the bone regeneration mechanism at bone
defects.
PCL-TCP scaffolds fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) have
a unique and consistent architecture. PCL-TCP scaffolds used in this study
have a 0/60/120° lay-down pattern. Angles here are with respect to the first
layer and parallel to polymer rods spaced evenly apart from each other. At the
forth layer, the pattern repeats itself to produce scaffold with triangular pores
when viewed from above. A regular distribution of pores is visible from the
24
side. By changing FDM parameters, scaffolds of different porosity and pore
size can be customised.
Fully interconnected pores and porosity of 65%
allowed canine osteoblasts to attach and proliferate on PCL-TCP scaffolds (Rai
et al., 2004). Combination with platelet-rich plasma in dog mandible
demonstrated higher bone regeneration and similar scaffold degradation
relative to controls (Rai et al., 2007; Rai et al., 2005a; Rai et al., 2005b). Previous
analysis by our group showed that surface modification with alkaline
treatment created micropores on rods of scaffolds and increases its surface
roughness concurrently. However, its mechanical properties were not
compromised; instead increased bone growth was observed within surface
modified scaffolds upon implantation (Yeo et al., 2008b; Yeo et al., 2009a,
2010).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of varying porosities
of PCL-TCP scaffolds on bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and
mechanical properties in a rabbit calvarial model. Compressive and shear
strength of scaffolds were obtained through mechanical testing. Micro CT and
histomorphometry analyses provided us with information on scaffold
degradation and bone ingrowth. Histology was used to examine scaffoldtissue interactions at a cellular level.
25
3.2
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.2.1
Scaffold Fabrication
Scaffold specimens (Osteopore International Pte Ltd, Singapore) were
fabricated with PCL- 20% TCP filaments using a fused deposition modeling
(FDM) 3D Modeler RP system from Stratasys Inc (Eden Prairie, MN). Blocks of
50 x 50 x 2mm were created directly in Stratasys Quickslice (QS) software. A
lay-down pattern of 0/60/120o was used to give a honey-combed like pattern of
triangular pores. The specimens were cut into smaller discs of 6mm in
diameter and 2mm in thickness subsequently. PCL-TCP scaffolds were
immersed in ethanol for sterilisation. This was followed by rinsing 3x in
phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCL, 10 mM Na 2 HPO 4 ,
1.8 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 7.4). Scaffolds were dried overnight prior to
implantation.
3.2.2
Porosity Calculation
Porosities were calculated by first measuring the weight and volume of
each sample. Apparent density of the scaffolds was calculated using the
following formula: ρ * = m (g) / V (cm3). Finally, scaffold porosities = ε = 1- ρ * /
ρ x 100 % (ρ = 1.17 g/cm3) were obtained.
3.2.3
Experimental Design
The scaffolds were randomly assigned to the defects made in the
calvaria of rabbits and followed up for 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks.
26
Two groups of PCL-TCP scaffolds (Figure 3.1) were analysed:
Group A: ~75% porosity
Group B: ~85% porosity
B
A
1 mm
1 mm
Figure 3.1: Micro CT images of scaffolds before implantation (A) Group A (B)
Group B
Micro-CT, mechanical strength testing (compressive strength and push
out test), histology and histomorphometric analyses were performed. A
minimum of 12 samples were required for each experimental group at 2, 4, 8,
12 and 24 weeks to have sufficient data for analysis as recommended by ISO
standard 10993-6. Since we had a total of 24 samples at each time point and 2
samples were implanted in each rabbit, 60 rabbits were needed for the entire
study.
3.2.4
Animal husbandry and scaffold implantation
Sixty, 6-8 month old New Zealand White male rabbits were used. The
study was approved by the SingHealth Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC) and conformed to the respective guidelines. The rabbits
27
were operated on under general anesthesia, which consisted of an
intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and xylazine mixture (75 mg/ kg + 10 mg/
kg). Under anesthesia, the skull region of the rabbit was shaved and scrubbed
with iodine, followed by disinfection with 70 % ethyl alcohol.
A midline incision was made in the skin of the calvaria along the
sagittal suture line. The soft tissue and periosteum are elevated and reflected.
Under constant saline irrigation, 6 mm diameter circular and 2 mm deep
defects were made using the appropriate trephine drills. A total of 2 circular
defects were made on the calvarium of each rabbit. Care is taken to preserve
the dura. Defects were randomly assigned to receive 1 of the 2 test scaffolds
(Figure 3.2). Prior closure, a non-resorbable membrane was positioned over the
defects to prevent soft tissue ingrowth. This was followed by repositioning of
the periosteum to cover the scaffolds followed by closure of the skin with
sutures. The rabbits were then given carpofen (1-2 mg/ kg) and cephalexin (1520 mg/ kg) subcutaneously for 3 and 5 days respectively.
Figure 3.2: Implantation of scaffolds into rabbit calvarial defects
28
Twelve rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks respectively.
All samples were processed and analyzed accordingly. The tissues
surrounding the selected implanted scaffolds were carefully removed and
stored in 10 % neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for histology (n = 3). The
remaining samples were wrapped in PBS-soaked gauze and frozen at -20 ºC
and subsequently subjected for micro-CT (n = 4; non-destructive), push out (n
= 4), compressive strength testing (n = 4) analyses. The rabbits were closely
monitored everyday for the first week for presence of swelling, pain and
infection. They were then observed weekly for severe weight loss (20-25 %)
and any other complications.
3.2.5
Micro-CT analysis
PCL-TCP scaffolds were scanned isotropically at 14 μm resolution with
an SMX-100CT micro-CT scanner (Shimadzu, Japan) using a cone CT scanning
technique. To ensure a consistent CT image resolution among all the datasets,
the scanner turntable location was fixed at a specific source-to-object distance
(SOD; 48.03 mm) and source-to-image distance (SID; 361.30 mm) respectively.
X-ray parameters were set at 33 kV and 156 μA and the CT images were
processed at a scaling coefficient of 100 and averaged 3 times. Region of
interest (6 mm diameter) was drawn at the site of implantation. Resultant
micro-CT datasets for each bone cube were evaluated for microarchitectural
parameters using VG Studio Max software (Heidelberg, Germany). Overall
bone formation and scaffold volume loss were obtained and analyzed.
29
3.2.6
Mechanical strength testing
Compressive test
Two kinds of mechanical testing (compressive test and push out test)
were performed using the Instron 5500 micro tester (Instron, Canton, MA)
with a 1kN load cell. Each specimen was placed between 2 flat plates for
compression testing. The scaffolds were compressed at a speed of 1mm/ min
up to 80% of scaffold original thickness at room temperature. The mechanical
results of load and extension were used to calculate the σ, Compressive Stress
(MPa) = [Load (N) / Area (m2)] x (1 x 10-6); ε, Strain = Extension (mm) / Original
Length (mm); and E, Elastic Modulus (MPa) = Compressive Stress (MPa) /
Strain. A stress-strain curve was then plotted using the experimental data
(load versus deformation) and the compressive modulus and strength was
recorded for each specimen, with the stiffness being measured as the slope of
the linear portion of the curve.
Push out test
Utilizing a similar Instron 5500 micro tester, push out test was done
using the same configuration except that a support jig with a hole of 7.2 mm
was used. Schematic diagram was shown previously (Yeo et al., 2009a).
Interfacial shear strength between old bone and the newly regenerated bonescaffold composite was calculated by dividing peak force with cross sectional
area of specimen.
30
3.2.7
Histological Analysis
The specimens were removed and stored in neutral buffered formalin
(NBF) 4% and were dehydrated in ascending series of alcohol rinses and
embedded using a process that produced ground sections with the glycol
metacrylate resin. Once polymerized, the block was trimmed to remove excess
plastic with an industrial vertical band saw and cut along its long axis with a
diamond band saw (EXAKT standard saw). Ground polished sections of 10
µm thickness were made using the EXAKT micro grinder system (EXAKT
Technologies, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK) and were subsequently stained with
Goldner’s trichrome to identify new bone formation. Three defects per group
were used at each time point per analysis.
3.2.8
Histomorphometric Analysis
Images of stained sections were taken with an Olympus SZX12
microscope connected to a CCD camera and measured using Bioquant Image
Analysis® software (Nashville, TN, USA). The region of interest (ROI) was
defined as area containing tissue within the defect site reaching from the
periphery of the host bone. New bone was quantified by selecting a fixed
threshold for positive stain pixels (black for Von Kossa). Percentage of bone
volume per tissue volume (%BV/TV) was calculated by the following formula.
31
3.2.9
Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR)
Prior to the animal sacrifice, fluorochrome markers alizarin red and
calcein green were administered into the rabbits at a time interval of 10 days.
Using unstained slides under fluorescence, high magnification (20x) images
were obtained for regenerated bone in the defect site using an epifluorescence
microscope (model BX51; Olympus). Up to 10 fields of view were taken for
each specimen. Two images were taken at each site using a green and a red
filter. Images were then merged with Adobe Photoshop and the inter-label
distances were measured using Bioquant Image Analysis® software
(Nashville, TN, USA) (Figure 3.3). The distances were taken from the center of
the first label to the center of the second label perpendicular to the labelled
surfaces. Mineral apposition rate was calculated using the formula below:
Figure 3.3: Calculation of interlabel distances using Bioquant Image Analysis®
software
32
3.2.10
Statistical Analysis
All values in this study were presented as mean values ± standard
deviation (SD). Data analyses and comparisons were performed using
Student’s paired t-test (Microsoft Excel). P-values of < 0.05 were considered as
statistical significance.
3.3
RESULTS
Throughout the surgery and post implantation period, rabbits showed no
signs of infections and were sacrificed at respective time points. Implanted
scaffolds remained in position throughout the entire study. Upon explantation
after 12 weeks, all defects created were completely filled. Samples felt hard
and vessels could be observed in all specimens.
3.3.1
Scaffolds characterisations
Group
+
Measured Porosity+
(%)
Pore size
(µm)
Rod size
A
74.9 ± 1.7
500 ± 73
0.163 ± 0.02
B
86.7 ± 0.2
723 ± 92
0.143 ± 0.003
(mm)
Values obtained from manufacturer. P < 0.05 was observed for all parameters
Table 3.2: Physical parameters of PCL-TCP scaffolds
TCP particles appeared as bright white particles relative to grey PCL as
shown in µ-CT images (Figure 3.1). They were shown to be evenly distributed
throughout the scaffold. The fused deposition modelled scaffolds were fully
33
interconnected and highly porous. (Group A: 74.9 ± 1.7%, Group B: 86.7 ±
0.2%) The pore size distribution is relatively consistent from the small
standard deviation. The pore size of Group B was 36.9 – 42.3% higher than
Group A.
3.3.2
A
µ-CT analysis
B
Figure 3.4: Representative µ-CT images of explants specimens with PCL-TCP
scaffold of (A) 75% porosity (B) 85% porosity (blue: scaffold, yellow: new bone
growth and beige: calvaria bone)
Figure 3.5: Percentage BV/TV in PCL-TCP scaffolds by µ-CT with varying
porosities from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation.
34
Before analysis of specimens, calibration was done on rabbit calvarial
bone and scaffolds which served as a benchmark for detecting and to
distinguish various components present in specimens (Figure 3.4). Bone
volume (BV) here refers to the amount of new bone growth detected at defect
site. Total volume (TV) is total volume available for growth at the defect site.
%BV/TV was observed to increase from the start to 8 weeks and stabilised
thereafter. There were no significant differences between Group A and B
throughout the experiment (Figure 3.5).
Figure 3.6: Scaffold volumes with varying porosities over a time period of 24
weeks.
Scaffold degradation in rabbit model seemed to follow a power law
relationship, regardless of porosity (Figure 3.6). However, there is an
additional constant which indicates that scaffold volume will fall to a specific
volume after prolonged periods of scaffold implantation. Scaffolds were
observed to degrade gradually throughout the study. At 24 weeks, scaffolds
35
with both porosities had volumes that closely matched each other (Group A:
8.34 ± 0.7mm3; Group B: 7.5 ± 0.25mm3).
Figure 3.7: Percentage of PCL-TCP scaffolds volume loss with varying
porosities from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation
Figure 3.7 indicates that 50% scaffold loss was achieved at different time
points for both groups. Group B scaffolds reported 50% degradation at around
6 weeks. This was faster than Group A scaffolds that demonstrated 50%
scaffold loss at around 10 weeks. Between 12 to 24 weeks, degradation of
scaffolds seemed to stabilize at 50-60% and there was no difference between
groups.
36
3.3.3
Compressive strength
Figure 3.8: Compressive strength of PCL-TCP scaffolds with varying porosities
from 2 to 24 weeks of implantation (* denotes p < 0.05)
Compressive strength in this study was taken at 50% strain to compensate
for the unevenness of the specimens. Compressive strength for Group B was
significantly lower at 2 weeks than Group A. Group A scaffolds experienced a
increase of 103% from 2 to 12 weeks and Group B scaffolds peaked at 8 weeks
and decreased after that (Figure 3.8). Porosity variations did not have a
significant effect on the amount of compressive strength.
37
3.3.4
Push Out test
Figure 3.9: Shear strength of PCL-TCP scaffolds with varying porosities from 2
to 24 weeks of implantation (* denotes p < 0.05)
Groups A and B showed a similar trend for shear strength at different time
points even though the decrease in Group B compared to Group A was
significant at 12 weeks (Figure 3.9). This suggests that the differences in
porosity had no immediate effect on shear strength. Shear strength of both
groups seemed to increase from 2 to 4 weeks and stabilises thereafter.
38
3.3.5
Histology
Figure 3.10: Representative images of ex vivo specimens at (A) 4 weeks (B) 8
weeks stained for Goldner’s Trichome (green sections: mineralised bone; areas
labelled ‘S’ denote PCL-TCP scaffolds)
Harvested samples were stained with Golder’s Trichome to identify new
bone formation in the defect site. New mineralised bone (green stains) was
detected between scaffolds rods and more evidently at later part of the study.
No significant differences were observed between groups. Overall, the absence
of fibrous encapsulation was an indication that PCL-TCP scaffolds were
compatible with its surroundings. The non-resorbable membrane (grey lining)
39
served as an orientation due to its position as top layer in the specimens.
Multi-nucleated giant cells were observed on the surface of scaffolds but not
on mineralised bone.
Neovascularisation, specifically in the presence of
vessels was also observed at the defect site.
3.3.6
Histomorphometric Analysis
Figure 3.11: Percentage BV/TV of PCL-TCP scaffolds by histomorphometry
with varying porosities from 8 to 24 weeks of implantation
New bone formation within defect site was divided by total defect area
to obtain %BV/TV by histomorphometry (Figure 3.11). Similar trend was
observed using µ-CT in Figure 3.5.
Bone mineralisation rate was measured by fluorescence quantification
from 8 to 24 weeks. The images demonstrated distinct clear labels in the defect
sites. This was an indication that new bone formation was actively taking
place. Flurochrome labels for 2 and 4 weeks were spread out and diffused
which did not allow for accurate measurements (Figure 3.12).
40
Figure 3.12: Representative image showing diffused flurochrome labels
between 2 and 8 weeks (red label – alizarin, green label – calcein)
3.3.7
Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR)
Figure 3.13: Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) of PCL-TCP scaffolds with
varying porosities from 8 to 24 weeks of implantation
There was no significant differences between MAR of Group A and Group
B. MAR for Group A peaked at 12 weeks (1.38µm/day) and Group B at 8
weeks (1.52µm/day). Both groups exhibited a reduction in MAR to 0.92 - 0.97
µm/day at 24 weeks.
41
3.4
DISCUSSIONS
Pore size and porosities serve as important material properties which
enable comparison between different scaffolds in bone regenerative and
scaffold degradation abilities. Pore size is important in bone regeneration as
they act as channels for cells and vessels to enter matrix for effective bone
formation. It also directly linked to mechanical strength of the scaffold. This is
especially vital for implantation to load bearing sites. Here, scaffolds of 75%
and 85% were chosen as previous studies by our group demonstrated
promising results with porosities between 70 – 90% and also to determine
whether there are any differences in bone regeneration in vivo with the
porosity difference.
Current literature reported conflicting results ranging from increased
bone regeneration for scaffolds with higher porosity (Ikeda et al., 2009; Kuhne
et al., 1994; Schliephake et al., 1991); lower bone growth with increased
porosity (Eggli et al., 1988; Flautre et al., 2001) and limited or no effects at all.
(Kasten et al., 2008; Roosa et al., 2009; Takahashi and Tabata, 2004). This
propels our team to investigate the effects of pore size and porosity on
previously researched PCL-TCP scaffolds that has proved its effectiveness in
bone regeneration through numerous studies (Yeo et al., 2008a; Yeo et al.,
2009b). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two different
42
porosities of scaffolds on bone growth and scaffold degradation in a rabbit
calvarial defect.
µ-CT characterisation of native scaffolds indicated that Group A (75%
porosity) had smaller pore sizes and larger rod diameters than Group B (85%
porosity). All the parameters indicated in Table 1 are closely related to
porosity. It has been shown previously that when the diameter of rods/fibers is
comparable or smaller than cells, quality and quantity of cellular attachment
will be reduced (Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005; Takahashi and Tabata, 2004).
The rods diameters’ of PCL-TCP scaffolds used in this study are about 100x
larger than size of cells which are about 10µm. µ-CT analysis has been used
widely to determine the extent of bone regeneration in BTE. This is mainly
because it is a non-destructive and fast technique. It also allowed us to
distinguish between scaffold, new bone formation and surrounding calvaria
bone within the specimen (Figure 3.6). The % BV/TV was found to increase by
68.6 - 100.6% from 2 to 8 weeks for both groups. Immediately after
implantation, increased blood flow at defect site, as indicated by the presence
of blood vessels in histology, initiated the cascade of wound healing and tissue
ingrowth. Bone formation at defect site was clearly detected on µ-CT images
(Figure 3.4).
After 8 weeks of implantation, bone growth for all groups
generally seems to have stabilized. The reduction of growth rate across all
43
groups suggests that bulk of bone remodelling is taking place (Yeo et al.,
2009b).
Following µ-CT analysis, the mechanical properties of scaffolds were
analysed. An implant can collapse if bone fails to infiltrate enough before
scaffold is resorbed considerably. However, scaffold degradation profile is
often neglected in previous studies as the emphasis is usually on bone
regeneration (Aronin et al., 2009; Heo et al., 2009). In this study, overall
degradation profile of PCL-TCP scaffolds in a rabbit model was mapped out
and analysed. We showed that PCL-TCP scaffolds degraded according to the
power law relationship described below:
(3.1)
Where y refers to current scaffold volume
x denotes time after implantation in weeks
C and n refer to constants depending on scaffold properties and environment.
d denotes scaffold volume that will remain after prolonged periods of
implantation
This equation allowed us to predict remaining scaffold volume (mm3) at a
specific time, thus enabling unobstructed bone growth by using an
appropriately selected scaffold. Group B (85% porosity) scaffolds broke down
more rapidly than Group A (75% porosity) before 12 weeks. After which, the
volume of scaffold remained constant. Here, degradation of PCL-TCP
scaffolds followed the degradation profile of PCL which degraded in two
44
stages namely: 1) surface erosion 2) bulk degradation. The first step is the non
enzymatic, random hydrolytic ester cleavage which is triggered automatically
by carboxyl end groups of the polymer chain. Chemical structure and
molecular weight of polymer will affect the duration of the first step of
degradation. When the molecular weight of polymer decreased to about 5000,
second step of degradation will commence. The rate of chain scission and
weight of polymer will decrease as a result of the formation and removal of
short chains of oligomers from the scaffold matrix. Fragmentation of polymer
precedes the absorption and digestion of polymer particles by phagocytes or
enzymes (C.G Pitt, 1981; Vert, 2002). TCP particles in PCL scaffolds are more
hydrophilic thus preferentially eroded when implanted. This causes TCP
particles to dislodge and increases surface area of PCL thereby accelerating
surface erosion (Lam et al., 2009; Yeo et al., 2010). Further analysis of previous
degradation profile of alkaline treated PCL-TCP scaffolds also pointed to
power law relationships, but to a lesser extent (lower R2 value). This can be
explained by formation of pits on scaffold surface after alkaline treatment
leading to a faster surface erosion process (Yeo et al., 2009b). Here, first stage
of degradation can be inferred to occur throughout the entire experiment.
Thus, degradation profile here (Equation 3.1) is only valid during the surface
erosion of PCL-TCP scaffolds. Bulk degradation, which is a slower process
will follow thereafter, may have a degradation profile which is completely
different from Equation 3.1.
45
Compressive strength of specimens can be regarded as a composite
which is guided by the rules of mixture or Voigt model (Lakes, 2007).
(3.2)
Where σ refer to compressive strength, f refers to volume fraction,
denotes
total strength, subscript S refers to scaffold component and subscript B refers
to bone component. Compressive strength is heavily influenced by the amount
of bone in the defect site. This is evident in the close resemblance in the
compressive strength and bone volume charts. Structural integrity of
specimens was evaluated by measuring compressive and interfacial shear
strength.
There was no significant differences between Groups A and B,
except at 2 weeks. The initial lower strength for Group B is probably due to
low compressive strength of scaffold as bone in-growth is still insufficient to
influence overall strength. Strength of bone
scaffold
is much larger than
. Thus, the dominant factor in total strength
changed from
scaffold strength to new bone strength during the experiment. Low volume
fraction of scaffolds
) (high porosities for Group A and B) also
contribute to the above.
Push out tests, which have been used widely to determine the
mechanical strength of implants at the interfaces in animal studies (Müller et
al., 2006; Sawyer et al., 2009). In this study, emphasis is placed on shear
strength between scaffolds in defect site and surrounding calvaria walls.
46
Increase from 2 to 4 weeks has been discussed previously. There were no
significant differences between Group A and B except at 12 weeks. The initial
increase before 4 weeks can be attributed to the bone growth starting from the
calvaria wall surrounding defect. After that, shear strength stabilised probably
due to sufficient bone has already infiltrated defect site at 4 weeks and new
bone continues its growing path into the centre of scaffolds. The above is
supported by %BV/TV values and histology images.
Histological analyses at various time points affirmed the findings from
µ-CT in that bone has penetrated scaffold voids more evidently at a later stage.
Adipose tissue was also residing alongside with bone. There was no evidence
of fibrous encapsulation of scaffolds in all specimens observed. This confirmed
PCL-TCP biocompatibility in an in vivo which attests to previous research
findings (Lam et al., 2009; Rai et al., 2007; Yeo et al., 2009b). Multi-nucleated
giant cells were observed to be only on the surface of scaffolds rods. Thus, they
were probably involved in the breaking down of PCL-TCP scaffolds and not
the newly formed bone. Vascularisation observed within regenerated defect
sites for both scaffolds indicate that vessels were able to infiltrate scaffolds
with pore sizes above 500µm, which is agreement with studies discussed
previously (El-Ghannam, 2004).
Histomorphometric analyses largely corroborated with µ-CT findings
in terms of bone volume. However, two and four week’s data were omitted
47
due to failure in bone detection. Bone was actively forming and new woven
bone does not have an organised structure that may have contributed to the
diffused flurochrome labelling, which negates any measurements. Notably,
MAR was able to provide us with bone growth rate in a lamellar fashion using
distances between inter-label distances. Generally, MAR seems to be declining
from 8 to 24 weeks and this might be due to remodelling that reduced
osteoblastic activity (Yeo et al., 2009b). This may be attributed to the
regeneration of cancellous calavria bone within defects at 12 weeks. Empty
pores within new bone growth evident in histology images can thus be
considered as trabecular structure of rabbit calavria.
Previous studies in rabbits had resulted in similar findings compared to
our current study. In an eight week study by Fisher et al, implantation of
poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds subcutaneously in rabbit calvaria did not
indicate any significant differences when pore sizes (300 – 500µm and 600 800µm) and porosities (57 – 75%) were varied (Fisher et al., 2002). Identical
findings were obtained when nitinol implants of varying pore sizes (179, 218
and 353 µm) and porosities (54, 51, 43%) were implanted into rabbits for 6
weeks (Ayers et al., 1999). Minor differences between scaffold groups may
have diminished its effects on bone regeneration and scaffold degradation in
this study. Only two groups of untreated scaffolds were presented here as a
48
concurrent study with alkaline treated PCL-TCP scaffolds which has been
published elsewhere (Yeo et al., 2010; Yeo et al., 2009b).
In the above studies, including our current work, the thickness of the
specimen was in the same order of magnitude as the implant diameter. One
limitation in adopting rabbit calvarial defect model lies in the thickness of
implants must conform to that of calvaria. Here, PCL-TCP scaffolds has a
thickness of 2mm. The impact of porosity variations on bone regeneration and
scaffold degradation was reduced as cellular and vascular infiltration is better
in thin models (Ayers et al., 1999). To address this problem, larger animal
models which enable thicker scaffold implants should be used for studies with
porosity and pore size as variables. This is in agreement with the hypothesis
that there should be a critical thickness to pore size ratio that will have a
significant impact on bone regeneration (Ayers et al., 1999).
3.5
CONCLUSIONS
This study aimed to investigate the effects of porosity and pore sizes of
PCL-TCP scaffolds on bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and mechanical
properties in rabbit calvarial defects over 24 weeks. Results indicated that
there were considerable bone growth and scaffold degradation especially at
the later stages of the study. Bone remodelling has already taken place at 24
weeks evidently from histology images but shear strength of implants were
49
not compromised. Absence of inflammatory cells affirmed previous findings
that PCL-TCP scaffolds are biocompatible. Histomorphometric analysis
affirmed µ-CT and mechanical test results. In all, pore size and porosities have
negligible effects on bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and structural
integrity in a rabbit calvarial model.
50
CHAPTER 4: PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF PCL-TCP
SCAFFOLDS AS CO-DELIVERY SYSTEMS FOR HEPARIN
AND BMP-2 IN VITRO
4.1
INTRODUCTION
In Chapter 3, ability of PCL-TCP scaffolds as a biomaterial upon
implantation into rabbit calvarial has been proven. However, acellular
scaffolds may not be the best option when treating large defects. Initial rigidity
of scaffold may not be sufficient to protect underlying brain unless new bone
formation is accelerated (Salyer et al., 1995). Thus, the use of growth factors eg
bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in this chapter come into play.
Documentations of the effectiveness of BMPs can be traced back to the
1960s. Urist found that BMPs are the proteins involved in bone healing.
Subsequently, BMP-2 has demonstrated its powerful osteoinductive abilities in
various studies. BMP-2 belongs to the superfamily of Transforming growth
factor (TGF)-β. BMPs ha s been shown to pla y an active role in cellular
regulation and function in bone function and repair. Furthermore, BMP-2 is
approved by FDA for use in fracture and spinal fusion applications (Jones et
al., 2006; Mont et al., 2004).
However, BMP-2 has short half life in vivo (Yamamoto et al., 2003).
Sustained release of BMP-2 has not been achieved at defect sites, thus
researchers turned to the usage of high and multiple doses (Jones et al., 2006).
51
This resulted in adverse effects including bone growth away from the defect
site (Lieberman et al., 2002; Valentin-Opran et al., 2002) and high cost of BMP-2
incurred for repeat administrations. Therefore, it is essential to develop a
system where the delivery of bioactive BMP-2 to the defect site is both
localised and sustained.
PCL-TCP have been shown to demonstrate excellent properties as bone
void fillers in chapter 3 and in previous studies (Lam et al., 2007; Rai et al.,
2007; Yeo et al., 2009a). Notably, PCL-TCP scaffolds had also been investigated
for its delivery properties with BMP-2 in combination with fibrin sealant. PCLTCP scaffolds when loaded with 20µg/ml of BMP-2 exhibited a triphasic
release profile, that was sustained. BMP-2 retained its bioactivity even after 21
days. (Rai et al., 2005b).
Heparin
is
a
sulphated
polysaccharide
which
belongs
to
glycosaminoglycan (GAG) family. It has been demonstrated to have an affinity
for growth factors namely BMP-2, FGF and VEGF (Steffens et al., 2004;
Wissink et al., 2000). Heparin binds to BMP-2 directly through the N-terminal
region of the mature polypeptide (Chung et al., 2007). BMP-2 bioactivity is
prolonged as a result.
The bioactivity and half-life of BMP-2 in culture
medium were increased by 20-fold when heparin was present (Zhao et al.,
2006). In view of the above, a co-delivery system of heparin and BMP-2 with
PCL-TCP scaffolds was proposed in this study. The effects of heparin and
52
BMP-2 on pig osteoblasts were first investigated for increased osteogenic
differentiation. The concentrations of heparin and BMP-2 with heightened
ALP activities were chosen for subsequent analysis. Following that, BMP-2
delivery profile in PBS buffer was mapped out and evaluated.
4.2
4.2.1
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Porcine osteoblasts culture
Porcine bone chips were obtained from pigs following their sacrifice after
surgical procedures as per ethical code. Bone chips (~2-3mm thickness) were
harvested from the mandible and incubated in a solution of PBS (containing
antibiotics/antimycotic) for transport back to the laboratory. They were then
vortexed in PBS (containing antibiotics/antimycotic) until the hematopoeitic
tissue was removed from the bone chips. The bone chips were dissected into
pieces of 2mm x 2mm. Bone chips were then immersed in Alpha MEM media
supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone, USA) and 1% PS at 37°C and 5% CO 2 ,
untouched for 1 week, before changing media. Medium was replaced every 3
days and cells were passaged when they are 70% confluent.
4.2.2
Cell culture and BMP-2 treatment
Cells at passages 3-5 were used throughout the experiment. Pig osteoblasts
(20000 cells/cm2) were plated in 24-well plates. Cells were inoculated in 3 ml of
osteogenic medium (Alpha MEM, 10% FBS (Hyclone, USA), 1% PS, 1µM Dex,
53
0.05mM absorbic acid and 10mM glycerol-2-phosphate) for 24 hrs. Following
that, medium was changed and replenished with treatment medium
containing varying concentrations of BMP-2 (R&D Systems, USA). 30µl of
BMP-2 (10, 100, 300 and 1000ng/ml) was added to the treatment medium and
cells were cultured for 3 days. Cells were lysed by rinsing with 1ml PBS/1mM
PMSF twice on a rotary shaker first. After addition of RIPA buffer (1% Triton
X-100, 150mM NaCl, 10mM Tris pH7.4, 2mM EDTA, 0.5% Igepal, 0.1% SDS)
and 1% of protease inhibitor(Calibiochem, Germany), cells were scraped using
pipette tips and placed on rotary shaker (100rpm) at 4°C for 15 minutes.
Suspensions were then centrifuged down at 11,000rpm at 4°C for 10 minutes
and supernatants were extracted for further analysis. All experiments were
carried out in triplicates.
4.2.3
Heparin and BMP-2 treatment
After the optimal concentration of BMP-2 with heightened ALP activity
was determined, concentrations of heparin (10, 100, 1000ng/ml) was in turn
varied. 30µl of heparin was incubated with 10µl of BMP-2 (10µg/ml) for 20
minutes. 1ml of PBS was resuspended with the mixture and added to each
well containing the pig osteoblasts.
4.2.4
Protein determination
The amount of proteins in lysed cells was determined using BCA protein
assay kit (Thermo Scientific, USA). 90µl of mixed reagent (A:B = 50:1) was
54
added to 10µl of samples in 96-well plates. This was followed by incubation at
37°C
for
30
minutes.
Protein
concentration
was
determined
spectrophotometrically at 595nm using multilabel counter.
4.2.5
Alkaline phosphatase activity
20µl of the lysed samples with protein concentrations of 20µg/ml were
placed into each well. The positive well consists of 1µl of Calf Intestinal
Phosphatase (Research Biolabs, England) and 19µl of RIPA buffer. 40µl of
assay buffer (1x pNPP buffer: Invitrogen, USA) was added to each well. After
incubation at 37°C for 60 minutes, samples were read at 405nm for
measurement of ALP activity.
4.2.6
Western blot
Lysates (12 µg of proteins) were separated on 10% (w/v) SDS–
polyacrylamide gels and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes.
Overnight incubation with primary antibodies (p-SMAD 1/5/8, Cell Signalling,
USA; Smad1/5/8, Santa Cruz, USA) was carried out at 4°C, followed by
secondary antibodies for 3 h at room temperature. Membranes were then
exposed to X-ray films for band detection.
4.2.7
Alizarin red staining
Confluent cells on well plates were rinsed 3x with PBS. They were then
fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 mins and rinsed 3x with DI water. Alizarin
55
red solution (13.7g/L) was added to cells and incubated for 30mins on shaker.
Cells were left at room temperature to dry for 2 days.
4.2.8
Release profile studies
Pig osteoblasts, with optimal concentrations of 30µl of BMP-2 and equal
volumes of heparin, mixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel kit, Baxter, USA) were
seeded onto scaffolds directly in 24 wells plates. After 1 hr of incubation at
37°C, scaffolds were flipped over and resuspensed to ensure complete
solidifying of mixture. After the second incubation period, 2ml of PBS was
added to individual wells. PBS was replaced at selected intervals: 2h, Day 1, 4,
7, 14, 21, 28 and analysed for BMP-2 and total protein release.
4.2.9
BMP-2 Release
BMP-2 release was assessed using an ELISA kit (Quantikine, R&D Systems,
USA). Supernatants were collected and frozen down to -20°C immediately.
Prior to analysis, they are thawed and 50µl of samples were assessed for BMP2 concentration according to manufacturer instructions.
4.2.10
Statistical Analysis
All values in this study were presented as mean values ± standard
deviation (SD) of the mean. Data analyses and comparisons were performed
using Student’s paired t-test (Microsoft Excel). P-values of < 0.05 were
considered as statistical significance.
56
4.3
4.3.1
RESULTS
Optimal BMP-2 concentration
Figure 4.1: Alkaline phosphatase activity per mg protein of cells at different
BMP-2 concentrations (* denotes p < 0.05)
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was monitored as it is a standard
early marker for osteogenesis. The results showed increased ALP activity in
pig osteoblasts when treated with 100, 300 and 1000ng/ml of BMP-2(Figure
4.1). ALP activity was highest at 1000 ng/ml of BMP-2. However, optimal
concentration was chosen to be 100 ng/ml due to high cost of BMP-2 and
similar ALP activity relative to 300 ng/ml.
57
4.3.2
Western blot analysis
Figure 4.2: Western blot for pig osteoblasts treated with 100ng/ml BMP-2 at
different treatment times. (top - phosphorylated SMAD 1/5/8 and bottom –
Total SMAD 1/5/8)
In the presence of BMP-2, total SMAD 1/5/8 was converted to p-SMAD
1/5/8, according to the TGF-β signaling pathway as described in Chapter 2. Fig
4.2 indicates a higher expression for both SMAD and p-SMAD after 24 hours
of BMP-2 treatment. The total SMAD expression was decreased significantly
by 48 hours.
58
4.3.3
Alizarin red staining
Figure 4.3: Alizarin red staining for pig osteoblasts with and without BMP-2
(control) treatment for 3 weeks.
Alizarin red staining was used to detect calcium deposition in cells. BMP-2
was shown to induce mineralization when added to C2C12 cells after 7 days
(Bessa et al., 2009). Slightly darker staining was observed for BMP-2 treated
pig osteoblasts relative to controls. This indicates increased mineralization of
osteoblasts induced by BMP-2.
4.3.4
Optimal heparin concentration
Figure 4.4: Alkaline phosphatase activity per unit protein of cells at different
BMP-2 and/or heparin concentrations (* denotes p < 0.05)
59
Heparin had been shown to have a potentiating and stabilizing effect on
BMP-2. ALP/protein activity of pig osteoblasts treated with 100 ng/ml of BMP2 was significantly higher than untreated ones. At 300ng/ml of heparin, ALP
activity was higher than at other concentrations (13.7-33.5%). Thus, it was
chosen as optimal concentration for further analyses.
4.3.5
Protein release profile
Figure 4.5: Amount of total protein release at various time points (Group A:
PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with PBS. Group B: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with
100ng/ml BMP-2. Group C: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of
heparin. Group D: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and
100ng/ml of BMP-2)
The general trend of protein release was a biphasic release for all groups
except heparin. High level of proteins was released at 2hr (0.55 – 0.74mg/ml)
and day 14 (0.52 – 0.66mg/ml). Protein release from Group C exhibited a
60
different release profile relative to other groups where the concentration was
0.54mg/ml at 2hr and decreased throughout the study.
4.3.6
BMP-2 release profile
Figure 4.6: Amount of BMP-2 release at various time points. (Group A: PCLTCP scaffolds loaded with PBS. Group B: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with
100ng/ml BMP-2. Group C: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of
heparin. Group D: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and
100ng/ml of BMP-2) Group A and C showed no release of BMP-2 at all time
points.
The concentration of BMP-2 release in PBS was determined using
ELISA kit. Group B demonstrated a biphasic release with heightened release at
2hr and day 14. However, Group D did not exhibit a significant BMP-2 release
(0 - 25.6pg/ml) throughout the study.
61
4.3.7
ALP bioactivity of eluted BMP-2
Figure 4.7: Bioactivity of eluted BMP-2 at different time points (Group A: PCLTCP scaffolds loaded with PBS. Group B: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with
100ng/ml BMP-2. Group C: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of
heparin. Group D: PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and
100ng/ml of BMP-2)
Generally, there were no significant differences between all groups at
various time points. Group B and D exhibited higher ALP activity at Day 1
and 4 compared to other groups (25.5 – 66.5%). ALP activity range of Group A
(7.8 – 25.4/mg protein) was similar to that of other groups (4.9 - 26.3/mg
protein).
4.4
DISCUSSIONS
As discussed previously, there are numerous studies on the delivery of
BMP-2 using a 3D matrix (Hosseinkhani et al., 2007; Kempen et al., 2008; Ruhé
62
et al., 2005). Problems like initial bursts upon implantation and bone growth
away from defect sites indicate that BMP-2 delivery is far from ideal. Our
group proposes a new co-delivery method of using heparin to effectively
deliver BMP-2 to the defect sites. Heparin has shown to potentiate, sustain and
stimulate BMP-2 through binding to its N-terminal (Zhao et al., 2006). Here,
BMP-2 and heparin were seeded onto biodegradable PCL-TCP scaffolds using
Tisseel fibrin sealant.
This study focused on the effects of heparin and BMP-2 on pig osteoblasts
and their release profile over 4 weeks when seeded in PCL-TCP scaffolds
using fibrin sealant. Pig osteoblasts obtained from mandible explants were
used in this experiment. This is in line with our next step to implant PCL-TCP
scaffolds loaded with heparin and BMP-2 into pig mandible defects. Thus, this
will paint a more accurate picture on the effects of heparin and BMP-2 on pig
osteoblasts upon implantation. The bioactivity of BMP-2 can be verified by the
responsiveness of pig osteoblasts through ALP activity. It has been used
widely as a biochemical marker for osteoblast differentiation (Cremers et al.,
2008; Katagiri et al., 1994). Pig osteoblasts displayed heightened ALP activity
when subjected to 100, 300 and 1000ng/ml of BMP-2 (Figure 4.1). Increased
ALP activity on C2C12 cells in demineralised bone matrix had been proven by
(Lin et al.). Similar effects have also been reported in another study (Zhao et
al., 2006). Highest ALP activity was obtained at 1000ng/ml. However,
63
100ng/ml was chosen primarily because of high cost of BMP-2 involved.
Another reason is that ALP activity of 300ng/ml seemed to have no significant
difference compared to 100ng/ml.
Western blot and alizarin red staining were then performed to verify
translated protein expression and mineralisation of pig osteoblasts by BMP-2
treatment. According to cell signalling pathway, total SMADs are present in all
cells and they will be converted to p-SMAD in the presence of BMP-2. A
higher expression of p-SMAD is detected at 24h compared to 2 and 48h. This is
in agreement with the cell signalling pathway. This was affirmed by previous
findings by our group when BMP-2 treatment times on C2C12 cells were
varied (data not shown). However in Figure 4.2, total SMAD were not fully
expressed at 2 and 48h. This deviation from signalling pathway might be due
to technical error during blotting or reduced bioactivity of primary antibodies.
Repeated freeze thaw activity and prolonged period of storage may result in
instability of its properties. Mineralisation of treated cells at 3 weeks was
detected by alizarin red staining. BMP-2 treated cells displayed a darker shade
of red which is in agreement with western blot findings. BMP-2 used in this
study resulted in increased osteoblast differentiation, induced p-SMAD
expression and mineralisation in pig osteoblasts.
In Figure 4.4, optimal concentration ratio of BMP-2 to heparin was
found to be 1:3. Similar study conducted on C2C12 cells with ratio of 1:5
64
demonstrated that heparin enhance osteoblast differentiation. Concentration
obtained here indicates that heparin has a positive effect on BMP-2 activity.
More testings on animal studies is needed to confirm the ratio.
Method of introducing heparin to BMP-2 may influence their interactions,
resulting in varied effects in bone regeneration. Direct addition of heparin to
BMP-2 (Zhao et al., 2006), crosslinking of heparin to demineralised bone
matrix (Lin et al., 2008) and conjugation of heparin to PLGA scaffolds (Jeon et
al., 2007) were some of the methods that was previously used and with good
results. Here, BMP-2 was allowed to react with heparin first during incubation
before mixing with medium and applying to cells. This allows sufficient time
for N terminal bonds to occur and prevent other reactions that may take place
preferentially. It can also simulate conditions whereby heparin is incorporated
in PCL-TCP scaffolds.
Fibrin sealant is derived from blood clots and has been used effectively
for healing of critical sized bone defects and non-unions in cats, dogs and rats
(Schmoekel et al., 2005). It has also been established as an effective method to
sustain BMP-2 diffusion. This is verified when fibrin is used in collagen
sponge for BMP-2 delivery in a rat spinal model. It has shown successfully to
control bone growth in undesirable areas such as nerve tissues (Patel et al.,
2006). Therefore, fibrin sealant was selected as delivery system for heparin and
BMP-2.
65
Protein release in PBS can be attributed to fibrin and BMP-2 eluted from
scaffolds. Fibrin release is dominant here as concentration of BMP-2 is
relatively lower at 100ng/ml (Figure 4.6). Biphasic protein release was evident
in Group A, B and D. Profile was similar to BMP-2 released for Group B and D.
Initial burst at 2h and Day 1 was mainly due to release of fibrin sealant and
uncrosslinked fibrin on the scaffold surface. Between day 4 to 7, BMP-2 was
locked in PCL-TCP scaffolds by fibrin sealant. At this time, scaffolds were
bound to the surface of well plate. Subsequent release of BMP-2 at Day 14 can
be attributed to the disintegration of fibrin within scaffolds whereby BMP-2
was released concurrently (Figure 4.6). Fibrin loaded scaffolds were also
observed to dislodge from the well plates. Release of BMP-2 after Day 14 can
be attributed to the release of TCP which has the ability to form intermolecular
bonds with BMP-2. Previous studies confirmed the findings (Rai et al., 2005b;
Wei et al., 2004).
There was a huge difference between Group C release profile relative to
the rest. Heparin seemed to react with fibrin sealant at the start of experiment
and thus resulting in a constant decrease in protein throughout the
experiment. Performance of fibrin in the presence of heparin has been
elucidated by Marx et al. Heparin did not have any effect on clotting time but
bonding strength was decreased by 20% (Marx and Mou, 2002). Here, Group
C’s protein release profile exhibited an initial burst and declined thereafter. It
66
is well known that heparin prevents the formation of fibrin clot by a series of
coagulation cascade activities. Even though different reaction has occurred
when heparin reacts with fibrin sealant causing degradation profile to differ,
clot formation and mechanical properties still remain intact. More in depth
characterisations are needed to determine the cause of this phenomenon. ALP
activity of the eluted BMP-2 did not exhibit any significant differences from
controls. This is to be expected from the low concentration of BMP-2 eluted
(Figure 4.6). Any concentration that is lower than 10ng/ml as depicted in
Figure 4.1 will have negligible effects relative to controls.
4.5
CONCLUSIONS
Heparin and BMP-2 has been investigated previously as supplementary
factor in the realm of bone regeneration. Here, heparin incubated with BMP-2
demonstrated higher ALP activity in pig osteoblasts than BMP-2 alone. The
bioactivity of BMP-2 was also verified at different time points. Interestingly,
BMP-2 in the presence of heparin when loaded on PCL-TCP scaffolds did not
showed a sustained release as hypothesized. More analysis is needed to
confirm the hypothesis. Further studies should focus on the controlled release
of BMP-2 and heparin loaded PCL-TCP scaffolds in an in vivo model.
67
CHAPTER 5: FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1
Effects of porosities of PCL-TCP scaffolds on in vivo bone
regeneration.
This particular chapter has its emphasis on two issues namely surface
modification and porosity of acellular PCL-TCP scaffolds where the latter is
the focus here. Thickness to pore size ratio of scaffolds was not studied in this
study and can be an interesting research area to look at. A micro pig model
will be appropriate for this study whereby thickness of the scaffolds can be
varied. Critical sized circular defect can be used again which allow for more
accurate determination of region of interest. Micro CT, histology and
mechanical testing should be conducted at 3 and 6 months to determine extent
of bone formation, cellular interactions and mechanical properties can be
evaluated. Mechanical properties can provide us with information on
structural integrity of specimens at that particular point. Similarly,
degradation profile of scaffolds can be mapped using data from Micro CT.
This will be more representative as it is conducted on a larger animal model.
5.2
Preliminary in vitro evaluation of PCL-TCP scaffolds as co-delivery
systems for heparin and BMP-2
Optimal concentrations and ratio of BMP-2 and heparin have been
determined in Chapter 4. Release of BMP-2 is inconclusive which is mainly
due to low concentration of BMP-2 used. Separate release study with a higher
68
concentration of BMP-2 and heparin whist maintaining the optimal ratio (1:3)
can be conducted. In fact, heparin release using alexa fluro has been conducted
concurrently in this study. Even though lowest detectable concentration stood
at 24ng/ml, no heparin was detected at 485nm. There is a possible reaction that
occurred between heparin and fibrin sealant as described in Chapter 4.
Heparin can also be radiolabelled and release can be tracked using suitable
counter. Next step can be to incorporate pig osteoblast into PCL-TCP scaffolds
with optimal ratio of heparin and BMP-2. At various time points,
characterisation like ALP, BCA and picogreen can be conducted to determine
their extent of differentiation, protein concentration and DNA content.
Alizarin red staining will also be able to determine the extent of
characterisation. Viability of cells on surface and within scaffolds can also be
determined using Live/dead stain.
69
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A.S.Htay,
S.H.T.a.D.W.H.,
Develpoment
of
perforated
microthin
poly(caprolactone) films as matrices for membrane tissue engineering.: J.
Biamater. Sci. Polymer Edn, v. 15, p. 683-700. 2004
Andrew, J.G., Hoyland, J.A., Freemont, A.J., and Marsh, D.R., Platelet-derived
growth factor expression in normally healing human fractures: Bone, v. 16, p.
455-60. 1995
Aronin, C.E.P., Sadik, K.W., Lay, A.L., Rion, D.B., Tholpady, S.S., Ogle, R.C.,
and Botchwey, E.A., Comparative effects of scaffold pore size, pore volume,
and total void volume on cranial bone healing patterns using microspherebased scaffolds: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, v. 89A, p.
632-641. 2009
Ayers, R.A., Simske, S.J., Bateman, T.A., Petkus, A., Sachdeva, R.L., and
Gyunter, V.E., Effect of nitinol implant porosity on cranial bone ingrowth and
apposition after 6 weeks: J Biomed Mater Res, v. 45, p. 42-7. 1999
Bae, J., Desai, U.R., Pervin, A., Caldwell, E.E., Weiler, J.M., and Linhardt, R.J.,
Interaction of heparin with synthetic antithrombin III peptide analogues:
Biochem J, v. 301 ( Pt 1), p. 121-9. 1994
Beruto, D.T., Mezzasalma, S.A., Capurro, M., Botter, R., and Cirillo, P., Use of
alpha-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) as powders and as an aqueous dispersion to
modify processing, microstructure, and mechanical properties of
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements and to produce bonesubstitute compounds: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, v. 49, p. 498505. 2000
Bessa, P.C., Casal, M., and Reis, R.L., Bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue
engineering: the road from laboratory to clinic, part II (BMP delivery): Journal
of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, v. 2, p. 81-96. 2008a
—, Bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue engineering: the road from the
laboratory to the clinic, part I (basic concepts): Journal of Tissue Engineering
and Regenerative Medicine, v. 2, p. 1-13. 2008b
Bessa, P.C.s., Balmayor, E.R., Hartinger, J., Zanoni, G., Dopler, D., Meinl, A.,
Banerjee, A., Casal, M., Redl, H., Reis, R.L., and van Griensven, M., Silk fibroin
microparticles as carriers for delivery of human recombinant BMP-2: Tissue
Engineering Part C: Methods, v. 0. 2009
70
Biomedical Tissue Research Group, Bone Structure, Volume 2009, University
of York. 1996
Biomedical Tissue Research Group, The bone remodelling process, Volume
2009, Department of Biology, University of York. 2007
BJD, The Initiative, Bone and Joint Decade Musculoskeletal portal, Volume
2009. 2000-2010
Boyan BD, H.T., KieswetterK, Schraub D, dean DD, Schwartz Z., Effect of
titanium surface characteristics on chondrocytes and osteoblasts in vitro: Cells
Mater., v. 5, p. 323-335. 1995
Brett PM, H.J., Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, Tonetti M',, Roughness
response genes in osteoblasts.: Bone, v. 35, p. 124-33. 2004
C.G Pitt, M.M.G., G.L. Kimmel, J. Surles and A. Schindler, Aliphatic polyesters
2. The degradation of poly(DL-lactide), poly(caprolactone), and their
copolymers in vivo: Biomaterials, v. 2, p. 215-220. 1981
Callis, T.E., Cao, D., and Wang, D.Z., Bone morphogenetic protein signaling
modulates myocardin transactivation of cardiac genes: Circ Res, v. 97, p. 9921000. 2005
CambridgeSoft Corporation, Calcium Phosphate Tribasic
ChemFinder.com Database and internet searching. 2004
[7758-87-4]
Canalis, E., McCarthy, T.L., and Centrella, M., Effects of platelet-derived
growth factor on bone formation in vitro: J Cell Physiol, v. 140, p. 530-7. 1989
Casey K C, T.S.K., S Liao, R Murugan, M Nigiam, S Ramakrishnan, Biomimetic
nanocomposities for bone graft applications: Nanomedicine, v. 1, p. 177-188.
2006
Caughey, G.H., Building a better heparin: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, v. 28, p.
129-32. 2003
Chen, R.R., and Mooney, D.J., Polymeric growth factor delivery strategies for
tissue engineering: Pharm Res, v. 20, p. 1103-12. 2003
71
Christopher XF Lam, S.H.T., Dietmar W Hutmacher, Comparison of the
degradation of polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone-(tricalcium phosphate)
scaffolds in alkaline solution: Polym Int, v. 56, p. 718-728. 2007
Chung, Y.I., Ahn, K.M., Jeon, S.H., Lee, S.Y., Lee, J.H., and Tae, G., Enhanced
bone regeneration with BMP-2 loaded functional nanoparticle-hydrogel
complex: J Control Release, v. 121, p. 91-9. 2007
Cremers, S., Garnero, P., and Seibel, M.J., Biochemical Markers of Bone
Metabolism, in John, P.B., Lawrence, G.R., and Martin, T.J., eds., Principles of
Bone Biology (Third Edition): San Diego, Academic Press, p. 1857-1881. 2008
Drosos, G.I., Kazakos, K.I., Kouzoumpasis, P., and Verettas, D.-A., Safety and
efficacy of commercially available demineralised bone matrix preparations: A
critical review of clinical studies: Injury, v. 38, p. S13-S21. 2007
Eggli, P.S., Muller, W., and Schenk, R.K., Porous hydroxyapatite and
tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted
in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and
histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution: Clin Orthop Relat
Res, p. 127-38. 1988
El-Ghannam, A.R., Advanced bioceramic composite for bone tissue
engineering: design principles and structure-bioactivity relationship: J Biomed
Mater Res A, v. 69, p. 490-501. 2004
Enneking, W.F., Eady, J.L., and Burchardt, H., Autogenous cortical bone grafts
in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects: J Bone Joint Surg Am, v. 62,
p. 1039-58. 1980
Fisher, J.P., Vehof, J.W.M., Dean, D., Waerden, J.P.C.M.v.d., Holland, T.A.,
Mikos, A.G., and Jansen, J.A., Soft and hard tissue response to
photocrosslinked poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds in a rabbit model:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, v. 59, p. 547-556. 2002
Flautre, B., Descamps, M., Delecourt, C., Blary, M.C., and Hardouin, P., Porous
HA ceramic for bone replacement: role of the pores and interconnections experimental study in the rabbit: J Mater Sci Mater Med, v. 12, p. 679-82. 2001
Friederike von Burkersrodaa, L.S., Achim G.opferich, Why degradable
polymers undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion: Biomaterials, v. 23, p. 42214231. 2002
72
Fromm, J.R., Hileman, R.E., Caldwell, E.E., Weiler, J.M., and Linhardt, R.J.,
Pattern and spacing of basic amino acids in heparin binding sites: Arch
Biochem Biophys, v. 343, p. 92-100. 1997
Gitelis, S., and Saiz, P., What's new in orthopaedic surgery: J Am Coll Surg, v.
194, p. 788-91. 2002
Gokhale, J.A., Boskey, A.L., and Robey, P.G., The Biochemistry of Bone, in
Robert, M., David, F., and Jennifer, K., eds., Osteoporosis (Second Edition): San
Diego, Academic Press, p. 107-188. 2001
Gotz, H.E., Muller, M., Emmel, A., Holzwarth, U., Erben, R.G., and Stangl, R.,
Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy
implants: Biomaterials, v. 25, p. 4057-64. 2004
Gray, E., Mulloy, B., and Barrowcliffe, T.W., Heparin and low-molecularweight heparin: Thromb Haemost, v. 99, p. 807-18. 2008
Hak-Joon Sung, C.M., Chad Johnson and Zorina S. Galis, The effect of scaffold
degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis:
Biomaterials, v. 25, p. 5735-5742. 2004
HCUP, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. 2006
Heo, S.-J., Kim, S.-E., Wei, J., Kim, D.H., Hyun, Y.-T., Yun, H.-S., Kim, H.K.,
Yoon, T.R., Kim, S.-H., Park, S.-A., Shin, J.W., and Shin, J.-W., In Vitro and
Animal Study of Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Poly(ɛ-Caprolactone)
Composite Scaffolds Fabricated by Layer Manufacturing Process: Tissue
Engineering Part A, v. 15, p. 977-989. 2009
Hosseinkhani, H., Hosseinkhani, M., Khademhosseini, A., and Kobayashi, H.,
Bone regeneration through controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2
from 3-D tissue engineered nano-scaffold: Journal of Controlled Release, v.
117, p. 380-386. 2007
Hurley, M.M., Abreu, C., Harrison, J.R., Lichtler, A.C., Raisz, L.G., and Kream,
B.E., Basic fibroblast growth factor inhibits type I collagen gene expression in
osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells: J Biol Chem, v. 268, p. 5588-93. 1993
Hutmacher D.W, S.T., Zein I, Ng K.W, Teoh S.H, Tan K.C., Mechanical
properties and cell culture response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed
73
and fabricated via fused deposition modeling: J. Biomed Mater Res, v. 55, p.
203-16. 2001
Hutmacher, D.W., Schantz, T., Zein, I., Ng, K.W., Teoh, S.H., and Tan, K.C.,
Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds
designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling: Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research, v. 55, p. 203-216. 2001
Ikeda, R., Fujioka, H., Nagura, I., Kokubu, T., Toyokawa, N., Inui, A., Makino,
T., Kaneko, H., Doita, M., and Kurosaka, M., The effect of porosity and
mechanical property of a synthetic polymer scaffold on repair of osteochondral
defects: International Orthopaedics, v. 33, p. 821-828. 2009
James M Pachence, J.K., Biodegradable polymers, Principles of tissue
engineering, Academic press. 2000
Jeon, O., Song, S.J., Kang, S.W., Putnam, A.J., and Kim, B.S., Enhancement of
ectopic bone formation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 released from a
heparin-conjugated poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold: Biomaterials, v. 28,
p. 2763-71. 2007
Johnson, E.E., Urist, M.R., and Finerman, G.A., Repair of segmental defects of
the tibia with cancellous bone grafts augmented with human bone
morphogenetic protein. A preliminary report: Clin Orthop Relat Res, p. 249-57.
1988
Jones, A.L., Bucholz, R.W., Bosse, M.J., Mirza, S.K., Lyon, T.R., Webb, L.X.,
Pollak, A.N., Golden, J.D., and Valentin-Opran, A., Recombinant human BMP2 and allograft compared with autogenous bone graft for reconstruction of
diaphyseal tibial fractures with cortical defects. A randomized, controlled trial:
J Bone Joint Surg Am, v. 88, p. 1431-41. 2006
Jones, J.R., Scaffolds for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, artificial organs and
tissue engineering: Imperial College London, UK, Woodward Publishing
Limited, p. 201-214. 2005
Juan Pena, T.C., Isabel Izquierdo-Barba, Antonio L. Doadrio and Maria ValletRegi, Long term degradation of poly([var epsilon]-caprolactone) films in
biologically related fluids: Polymer Degradation and Stability, v. 91, p. 14241432. 2006
74
K A Hing, S.M.B., K E Tanner, P A Revell W Bonfield, Histomorphological and
biomechanical characterization of calcium phosphates in the osseous
environment: Proc Istn Mech Engrs, v. 212H, p. 437-451. 1998
Karageorgiou, V., and Kaplan, D., Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and
osteogenesis: Biomaterials, v. 26, p. 5474-91. 2005
Kasten, P., Beyen, I., Niemeyer, P., Luginbühl, R., Bohner, M., and Richter, W.,
Porosity and pore size of [beta]-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence
protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal
stem cells: An in vitro and in vivo study: Acta Biomaterialia, v. 4, p. 1904-1915.
2008
Katagiri, T., Yamaguchi, A., Komaki, M., Abe, E., Takahashi, N., Ikeda, T.,
Rosen, V., Wozney, J., Fujisawa-Sehara, A., and Suda, T., Bone morphogenetic
protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the
osteoblast lineage [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1995
Feb;128(4):following 713]: J. Cell Biol., v. 127, p. 1755-1766. 1994
Kay, J.F., Tissue-engineered bone products, in Robert, L., Robert, L., and
Joseph, V., eds., Principles of Tissue Engineering (Third Edition): Burlington,
Academic Press, p. 1225-1236. 2007
Kempen, D.H., Lu, L., Hefferan, T.E., Creemers, L.B., Maran, A., Classic, K.L.,
Dhert, W.J., and Yaszemski, M.J., Retention of in vitro and in vivo BMP-2
bioactivities in sustained delivery vehicles for bone tissue engineering:
Biomaterials, v. 29, p. 3245-52. 2008
Khan, S.N., Bostrom, M.P., and Lane, J.M., Bone growth factors: Orthop Clin
North Am, v. 31, p. 375-88. 2000
Kuboki, Y., Jin, Q., and Takita, H., Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic
expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis: J Bone Joint
Surg Am, v. 83-A Suppl 1, p. S105-15. 2001
Kuboki, Y., Takita, H., Kobayashi, D., Tsuruga, E., Inoue, M., Murata, M.,
Nagai, N., Dohi, Y., and Ohgushi, H., BMP-induced osteogenesis on the
surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible
structures: topology of osteogenesis: J Biomed Mater Res, v. 39, p. 190-9. 1998
Kuhne, J.H., Bartl, R., Frisch, B., Hammer, C., Jansson, V., and Zimmer, M.,
Bone formation in coralline hydroxyapatite. Effects of pore size studied in
rabbits: Acta Orthop Scand, v. 65, p. 246-52. 1994
75
Lakes, J.P.a.R.S., Biomaterials An Introduction, Springer Science+Business
Media LLC. 2007
Lam, C.X., Hutmacher, D.W., Schantz, J.T., Woodruff, M.A., and Teoh, S.H.,
Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and
in vivo: J Biomed Mater Res A, v. 90, p. 906-19. 2009
Lam, C.X., Teoh, S.H., and Hutmacher, D.W., Comparison of the degradation
of polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone-(beta-tricalcium phosphate)
scaffolds in alkaline medium: Polymer International, v. 56, p. 718-728. 2007
Langer, R., and Vacanti, J.P., Tissue engineering: Science, v. 260, p. 920-6. 1993
Lever, R., and Page, C.P., Novel drug development opportunities for heparin:
Nat Rev Drug Discov, v. 1, p. 140-8. 2002
Lian J , S.G., Canalis E , Gehron Robey P , and Boskey A, Bone formation:
Osteoblast lineage cells, growth factors, matrix proteins and the mineralisation
process . in Favus M ed., Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders
of mineral metabolism, Volume pp. 14 – 29: Philadelphia Lippincott William &
Wilkins. 1999
Lickorish, D., Ramshaw, J.A., Werkmeister, J.A., Glattauer, V., and Howlett,
C.R., Collagen-hydroxyapatite composite prepared by biomimetic process: J
Biomed Mater Res A, v. 68, p. 19-27. 2004
Lieberman, J.R., Daluiski, A., and Einhorn, T.A., The role of growth factors in
the repair of bone. Biology and clinical applications: J Bone Joint Surg Am, v.
84-A, p. 1032-44. 2002
Lin, H., Zhao, Y., Sun, W., Chen, B., Zhang, J., Zhao, W., Xiao, Z., and Dai, J.,
The effect of crosslinking heparin to demineralized bone matrix on mechanical
strength and specific binding to human bone morphogenetic protein-2:
Biomaterials, v. 29, p. 1189-97. 2008
Marx, G., and Mou, X., Characterizing fibrin glue performance as modulated
by heparin, aprotinin, and factor XIII: Journal of Laboratory and Clinical
Medicine, v. 140, p. 152-160. 2002
MOH, Ministry of Health: Government Health Expenditure. 2008
76
Mont, M.A., Ragland, P.S., Biggins, B., Friedlaender, G., Patel, T., Cook, S.,
Etienne, G., Shimmin, A., Kildey, R., Rueger, D.C., and Einhorn, T.A., Use of
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Musculoskeletal Applications: An Overview:
J Bone Joint Surg Am, v. 86, p. 41-55. 2004
Müller, M., Hennig, F.F., Hothorn, T., and Stangl, R., Bone-implant interface
shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore
Ti6Al4V implants: Journal of Biomechanics, v. 39, p. 2123-2132. 2006
NHED, National Health Expenditure Data: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2006
Nillesen, S.T., Geutjes, P.J., Wismans, R., Schalkwijk, J., Daamen, W.F., and van
Kuppevelt, T.H., Increased angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in
acellular collagen-heparin scaffolds containing both FGF2 and VEGF:
Biomaterials, v. 28, p. 1123-31. 2007
Paramore, C.G., Lauryssen, C., Rauzzino, M.J., Wadlington, V.R., Palmer, C.A.,
Brix, A., Cartner, S.C., and Hadley, M.N., The safety of OP-1 for lumbar fusion
with decompression-- a canine study: Neurosurgery, v. 44, p. 1151-5;
discussion 1155-6. 1999
Patel, V.V., Zhao, L., Wong, P., Kanim, L., Bae, H.W., Pradhan, B.B., and
Delamarter, R.B., Controlling bone morphogenetic protein diffusion and bone
morphogenetic protein-stimulated bone growth using fibrin glue: Spine (Phila
Pa 1976), v. 31, p. 1201-6. 2006
Pimentel, E., Handbook of Growth Factors I: General Basic Aspects: Boca
Raton, Florida, CRC Press. 1994
Price RL, E.K., Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ, Nanometer surface roughness
increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts.: J Biomed
Mater Res A, v. 70, p. 129-38. 2004
Rai, B., Ho, K.H., Lei, Y., Si-Hoe, K.-M., Jeremy Teo, C.-M., Yacob, K.b., Chen,
F., Ng, F.-C., and Teoh, S.H., Polycaprolactone-20% Tricalcium Phosphate
Scaffolds in Combination With Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of
Critical-Sized Defects of the Mandible: A Pilot Study: Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 65, p. 2195-2205. 2007
Rai, B., Teoh, S.H., and Ho, K.H., An in vitro evaluation of PCL-TCP
composites as delivery systems for platelet-rich plasma: Journal of Controlled
Release, v. 107, p. 330-342. 2005a
77
Rai, B., Teoh, S.H., Ho, K.H., Hutmacher, D.W., Cao, T., Chen, F., and Yacob,
K., The effect of rhBMP-2 on canine osteoblasts seeded onto 3D bioactive
polycaprolactone scaffolds: Biomaterials, v. 25, p. 5499-5506. 2004
Rai, B., Teoh, S.H., Hutmacher, D.W., Cao, T., and Ho, K.H., Novel PCL-based
honeycomb scaffolds as drug delivery systems for rhBMP-2: Biomaterials, v.
26, p. 3739-3748. 2005b
Raisz, L.G., and Seeman, E., Causes of age-related bone loss and bone fragility:
an alternative view: J Bone Miner Res, v. 16, p. 1948-52. 2001
Rezwan K, C.Q.Z., Blaker J.J, Boccaccini A.R, Biodegradable and bioactive
porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering:
Biomaterials, v. 27, p. 3413-31. 2006
Rifkin, D.B., and Moscatelli, D., Recent developments in the cell biology of
basic fibroblast growth factor: J Cell Biol, v. 109, p. 1-6. 1989
Roosa, S.M., Kemppainen, J.M., Moffitt, E.N., Krebsbach, P.H., and Hollister,
S.J., The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone
regeneration in an in vivo model: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009
Roy, T.D., Simon, J.L., Ricci, J.L., Rekow, E.D., Thompson, V.P., and Parsons,
J.R., Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via
three-dimensional fabrication techniques: J Biomed Mater Res A, v. 66, p. 28391. 2003
Ruhé, P.Q., Boerman, O.C., Russel, F.G.M., Spauwen, P.H.M., Mikos, A.G., and
Jansen, J.A., Controlled release of rhBMP-2 loaded poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic
acid)/calcium phosphate cement composites in vivo: Journal of Controlled
Release, v. 106, p. 162-171. 2005
Ruppert, R., Hoffmann, E., and Sebald, W., Human bone morphogenetic
protein 2 contains a heparin-binding site which modifies its biological activity:
Eur J Biochem, v. 237, p. 295-302. 1996
Sakou, T., Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic studies to clinical
approaches: Bone, v. 22, p. 591-603. 1998
Salyer, K.E., Bardach, J., Squier, C.A., Gendler, E., and Kelly, K.M.,
Cranioplasty in the growing canine skull using demineralized perforated bone:
Plast Reconstr Surg, v. 96, p. 770-9. 1995
78
Sawyer, A.A., Song, S.J., Susanto, E., Chuan, P., Lam, C.X.F., Woodruff, M.A.,
Hutmacher, D.W., and Cool, S.M., The stimulation of healing within a rat
calvarial defect by mPCL-TCP/collagen scaffolds loaded with rhBMP-2:
Biomaterials, v. 30, p. 2479-2488. 2009
Schliephake, H., Neukam, F.W., and Klosa, D., Influence of pore dimensions
on bone ingrowth into porous hydroxylapatite blocks used as bone graft
substitutes. A histometric study: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, v. 20, p. 53-8. 1991
Schmoekel, H.G., Weber, F.E., Schense, J.C., Gratz, K.W., Schawalder, P., and
Hubbell, J.A., Bone repair with a form of BMP-2 engineered for incorporation
into fibrin cell ingrowth matrices: Biotechnol Bioeng, v. 89, p. 253-62. 2005
Senn, On the Healing of Aseptic Bone Cavities by Implantation of Antiseptic
Decalcified Bone: Ann Surg, v. 10, p. 352-68. 1889
Simic, P., and Vukicevic, S., Bone morphogenetic proteins in development and
homeostasis of kidney: Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, v. 16, p. 299-308. 2005
Steffens, G.C., Yao, C., Prevel, P., Markowicz, M., Schenck, P., Noah, E.M., and
Pallua, N., Modulation of angiogenic potential of collagen matrices by covalent
incorporation of heparin and loading with vascular endothelial growth factor:
Tissue Eng, v. 10, p. 1502-9. 2004
Stevens, B., Yang, Y., Mohandas, A., Stucker, B., and Nguyen, K.T., A review
of materials, fabrication methods, and strategies used to enhance bone
regeneration in engineered bone tissues: Journal of Biomedical Materials
Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, v. 85B, p. 573-582. 2008
Sundelacruz, S., and Kaplan, D.L., Stem cell- and scaffold-based tissue
engineering approaches to osteochondral regenerative medicine: Seminars in
Cell & Developmental Biology, v. 20, p. 646-655. 2009
Tabata, Y., Significance of release technology in tissue engineering: Drug
Discov Today, v. 10, p. 1639-46. 2005
Takahashi, Y., and Tabata, Y., Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of nonwoven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem
cells: Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, v. 15, p. 41-57. 2004
Temenoff, J.S., and Mikos, A.G., Injectable biodegradable materials for
orthopedic tissue engineering: Biomaterials, v. 21, p. 2405-12. 2000
79
Tsuruga, E., Takita, H., Itoh, H., Wakisaka, Y., and Kuboki, Y., Pore size of
porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced
osteogenesis: J Biochem, v. 121, p. 317-24. 1997
Urist, M.R., Bone:formation by autoinduction: Science, v. 150. 1965
Valentin-Opran, A., Wozney, J., Csimma, C., Lilly, L., and Riedel, G.E., Clinical
evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: Clin Orthop
Relat Res, p. 110-20. 2002
Vert, S.L.a.M., Biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters, Degradable Polymers
Principles and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2002
Vukicevic, S., and Sampath, K., Introduction, p. 1-5. 2008
Walker, D.H., and Wright, N.M., Bone morphogenetic proteins and spinal
fusion: Neurosurg Focus, v. 13, p. e3. 2002
Wei, G., Pettway, G.J., McCauley, L.K., and Ma, P.X., The release profiles and
bioactivity of parathyroid hormone from poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
microspheres: Biomaterials, v. 25, p. 345-52. 2004
Wikipedia, t.f.e.,
Polycaprolactone, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycaprolactone, Wikimedia
Foundation Incorporated. 2006
Wissink, M.J., Beernink, R., Scharenborg, N.M., Poot, A.A., Engbers, G.H.,
Beugeling, T., van Aken, W.G., and Feijen, J., Endothelial cell seeding of
(heparinized) collagen matrices: effects of bFGF pre-loading on proliferation
(after low density seeding) and pro-coagulant factors: J Control Release, v. 67,
p. 141-55. 2000
Xiao, Y.T., Xiang, L.X., and Shao, J.Z., Bone morphogenetic protein: Biochem
Biophys Res Commun, v. 362, p. 550-3. 2007
Y. Lei, B.R., K.H. Ho and S.H. Teoh, In vitro degradation of novel bioactive
polycaprolactone--20% tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone
engineering: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 27, p. 293-298. 2007
Yamamoto, M., Takahashi, Y., and Tabata, Y., Controlled release by
biodegradable hydrogels enhances the ectopic bone formation of bone
morphogenetic protein: Biomaterials, v. 24, p. 4375-83. 2003
80
Yancopoulos, G.D., Davis, S., Gale, N.W., Rudge, J.S., Wiegand, S.J., and
Holash, J., Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation:
Nature, v. 407, p. 242-8. 2000
Yeo, A., Rai, B., Sju, E., Cheong, J.J., and Teoh, S.H., The degradation profile of
novel, bioresorbable PCL-TCP scaffolds: An in vitro and in vivo
study: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, v. 84A, p. 208-218.
2008a
Yeo, A., Sju, E., Rai, B., and Teoh, S.H., Customizing the degradation and loadbearing profile of 3D polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds under
enzymatic and hydrolytic conditions: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Part B: Applied Biomaterials, v. 87B, p. 562-569. 2008b
Yeo, A., Wong, W.J., Khoo, H.H., and Teoh, S.H., Surface modification of PCLTCP scaffolds improve interfacial mechanical interlock and enhance early bone
formation: An in vitro and in vivo characterization: Journal of
Biomedical Materials Research Part A, v. 92A, p. 311-321. 2010
Yeo, A., Wong, W.J., and Teoh, S.H., Surface modification of PCL-TCP
scaffolds in rabbit calvaria defects: Evaluation of scaffold degradation profile,
biomechanical properties and bone healing patterns
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, v. Accepted July 2009. 2009b
Zein I, H.D., Tan KC and Teoh SH, Fused deposition modeling of novel
scaffold architeures for tissue engineering applications: Biomaterials, v. 23, p.
1169-1185. 2002
Zhang, Y., and Zhang, M., Three-dimensional macroporous calcium phosphate
bioceramics with nested chitosan sponges for load-bearing bone implants: J
Biomed Mater Res, v. 61, p. 1-8. 2002
Zhao, B., Katagiri, T., Toyoda, H., Takada, T., Yanai, T., Fukuda, T., Chung,
U.I., Koike, T., Takaoka, K., and Kamijo, R., Heparin potentiates the in vivo
ectopic bone formation induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2: J Biol
Chem, v. 281, p. 23246-53. 2006
81
APPENDIX (PUBLICATIONS)
82
[...]... current bone grafts as discussed propel researchers to look into the field of bone tissue engineering for an ideal bone substitute 1.1.3 Strategies in BTE Tissue engineering is the restoration, improvement, maintenance and substitution of damaged tissues and organs using principles of biology and engineering (Langer and Vacanti, 1993) BTE consists of an interplay of scaffold technology, growth factors and. .. 2.1 BONE PHYSIOLOGY In order to regenerate bone using BTE techniques, the understanding of the structure and cells which participate in bone repair is of utmost importance Bone is composed of around 70-90% of minerals with the rest in the form of proteins Within the proteins in bone, the ratio of collagenous to noncollagenous stands at 9:1 This is in stark contrast with other tissues consisting of only... co-delivery system in a porcine model Optimal concentration of both BMP-2 and heparin was then determined and adapted for subsequent analysis Release profile of BMP-2 from PCL- TCP scaffolds was plotted for signs of sustained delivery when immersed in PBS solution Heparin was chosen to improve binding and regulate release of BMP-2 here and concurrently act as a framework for binding of endogenous growth... PCL- TCP scaffolds loaded with 100ng/ml BMP-2 Group C: PCL- TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin Group D: PCL- TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2) xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND This chapter aims to give the reader an overview of the current trends in bone tissue engineering (BTE) Following that, limitations of available treatments for bone defects and. .. functions of BMPs include heart development (Callis et al., 2005; Simic and Vukicevic, 2005) and kidney formation (Simic and Vukicevic, 2005) There exists a heparin binding site in N-terminal region of mature BMP-2 polypeptide In pioneering work by Ruppert in 1996, it was shown that BMP-2 activity was increased upon interactions with heparins present in ECM In the presence of N terminus of BMP-2 and heparin,... The purpose of using composites for medical applications usually is to reduce drawbacks of individual materials and the benefits of both are 14 combined together Here, PCL is highly hydrophobic which leads to a longer degradation period (>2 years) in vitro and in vivo TCP alone, when fabricated into a scaffold is brittle and weak in strength By using PCL- TCP scaffolds for guided bone regeneration, the... (Chen and Mooney, 2003) 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The general aim in this thesis was to evaluate and improve on the current properties of PCL- TCP composites from various aspects namely porosity and cell modulators in both in vitro and in vivo environments The two specific aims of this research was 1 To investigate the effects of bone regeneration, scaffold degradation and mechanical properties of PCL- TCP. .. loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2) Figure 4.6: Amount of BMP-2 release at various time points (Group B: PCLTCP scaffolds loaded with 100ng/ml BMP-2 Group D: PCL- TCP scaffolds loaded with 300ng/ml of heparin and 100ng/ml of BMP2) Group A and C showed no release of BMP-2 at all time points Figure 4.7: Bioactivity of eluted BMP-2 at different time points (Group A: PCL- TCP scaffolds loaded... phase of bone in form of hydroxyapatite TCP is also responsible for the hardness of bone, dentine and enamel TCP exhibit excellent regenerative activity when placed in vivo (Beruto et al., 2000) However, it has poor mechanical properties such as low compressive strength This contributed to its brittleness when fabricated in blocks and scaffolds (K A Hing, 1998) 2.2.4 PCL- TCP scaffolds The purpose of using... regenerative capabilities Ectopic bone formation was induced using decalcified bone or injected bone extracts in one of the earliest study on bone regeneration (Senn, 1889) The breakthrough came about when Marshall Urist discovered that bone formed at ectopic sites in rodents upon addition of proteins extracted from demineralised bone matrix He named the protein Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP)” as its regenerative ... bone tissue engineering for an ideal bone substitute 1.1.3 Strategies in BTE Tissue engineering is the restoration, improvement, maintenance and substitution of damaged tissues and organs using... 70-90% of minerals with the rest in the form of proteins Within the proteins in bone, the ratio of collagenous to noncollagenous stands at 9:1 This is in stark contrast with other tissues consisting... using principles of biology and engineering (Langer and Vacanti, 1993) BTE consists of an interplay of scaffold technology, growth factors and cells In this thesis, the focus will be on using composite