1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo Dục - Đào Tạo

Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division

139 382 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

MECHANISMS OF ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION GOH LIHUI (WU LIHUI) B.SC (HONS) NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, SINGAPORE A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY NUS GRADUATE SCHOOL FOR INTEGRATIVE SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Yang Xiaohang for his kind guidance and support and patience for me during my one year as research officer and four years of Ph.D studies. He not only gave me a lot of encouragement and feedback, but also a large degree of freedom for me to express and carry out my own ideas. All these allowed me to overcome the many obstacles in my course of study. I would also like to thank Prof. Wang Yue whom took me under his group and for the last eight months of my studies. I would also like to thank Dr. Wang Huashan, Dr. Lin Shuping, Dr. Lee Meichin, Ms. Sung Ying Ying, Mr. Huang Zhenxing and Ms. Lee Chai Ling for all the selfless advice, support, help and encouragement. Their willingness to share their knowledge and to render their helping hands whenever possible will always be remembered by me. I would also like to thank all the past and present members of both Yang Xiaohang group and Wang Yue group for their friendship and kind help. I would also like to thank Prof. Tang Bor Luen and Prof. Thomas Leung of my Thesis Advisory Committee for their generous advice and relentless effort in helping me throughout my course of study. Last but not least, I am very thankful and grateful to my family members and my friends whom unconditionally supported me, whom always stood by me, constantly giving me comfort and encouragement whenever I needed it. Their love sustained me for my entire period of candidature and enabled me to overcome all obstacles in my path. i Table of contents Acknowledgements . i Table of contents . ii Summary . vi List of Tables . viii List of Figures ix List of Abbreviations xii Chapter 1: Introduction . Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for study . Asymmetric cell division Drosophila neuroblasts in neurogenesis . Asymmetric cell division in neuroblast 10 Setting up cell polarity . 11 Mitotic spindle orientation 13 Asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants . 14 Asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants 17 Localizing the cell fate determinants by apical exclusion 17 aPKC substrate specificity is linked with cell cycle 19 Lgl as a molecular buffer 20 ii Other regulators of asymmetric cell division . 21 Cancer and stem cell asymmetric cell division 23 Chapter 2: Materials and methods 25 Molecular biology 25 DNA application . 25 RNA application 34 Protein application . 36 Drosophila melanogaster manipulation 37 General maintenance of Drosophila melanogaster . 37 Fly stocks used in the study . 37 RNAi knockdown in Drosophila melanogaster 38 Generation of revertants . 38 Isogenize and removal of background mutation . 39 Recombination . 39 Climbing assay 39 Larval brain dissection . 40 Pupal nota dissection . 40 Cell line manipulation 41 General maintenance of cell line . 41 RNAi treatment of cells 41 iii Transfection of cells . 42 Biochemistry 42 Antibodies 42 SDS-PAGE . 43 Western blot 44 Co-immunoprecipitation 44 Immunohistochemistry 45 List of antibodies used . 45 Immunofluorescence staining of larval brains 46 Immunofluorescence staining of pupal notum . 46 Chapter 3: clueless . 48 Introduction . 48 clueless was identified in an RNAi screen to be involved in asymmetric cell division of the adult sensory organ precursor. . 51 clueless . 54 Generation of clueless mutant . 58 clu169 mutant is semi lethal 61 clu169 mutants display a weak phenotype of mislocalized Miranda 65 Mutations in clu rescue the tumor formation phenotype and mislocalization of cell fate determinants in lgl mutants. 67 Deletion of clu rescues lgl mutant phenotype by down-regulation of aPKC. . 71 iv Down-regulation of aPKC in lgl clu double mutant does not rescue the mislocalization of aPKC. 76 Clu forms a complex with aPKC . 79 Deletion of clu does not cause mitochondria clustering in the larval brain neuroblasts. 80 Down-regulation of aPKC in lgl clu double mutant is independent of transcription. . 83 Deletion of clu also rescues phenotype caused by overexpression of aPKCCAAX in larval brain neuroblasts. 86 Clu is associated with the active Par6-aPKC-Baz complex . 89 Summary of results 91 Future work and direction . 94 Chapter 4: Discussion . 102 The equilibrium of Par6-aPKC-Baz and Par6-aPKC-Lgl complex 102 clu mutant is protected by Lgl . 104 parkin and clu . 104 The lack of mitochondria clustering 105 Clueless about clueless 106 Neurodegeneration versus cancer 107 Potential novel target for cancer therapy . 109 References . 111 v Summary Asymmetric cell division is an important process by which a cell divides to give two different daughter cells. This process is important in stem cells whereby a single division produces two cells, one of which is the stem cell itself and the other, committed or differentiated daughter cell. This process is highly controlled, as failure of which would result in depletion of stem cells or uncontrolled cell proliferation, leading to diseases like Parkinson’s disease or cancer. Asymmetric cell division is well studied in the model organism Drosophila neuroblast and sensory organ precursor. It is known that proteins in the apical complex such as atypical Protein Kinase C (aPKC), Bazooka (Baz), Partitioning Defective (Par6), Inscuteable, Partner of Inscuteable and G-protein alpha-I subunit direct cell fate determinants such as Numb, Partner of Numb, Miranda, Prospero, and Brain Tumor to localize as a basal crescent in the cell such that they would be inherited by only one of the daughter cells. However, detailed mechanism of this directing of cell fate determinants is largely unknown. Using a UAS-GAL4 system to drive expression of RNAi constructs in the central and peripheral nervous system, I identified clueless (clu) as one of the candidate genes that are involved in asymmetric cell division of the larval brain neuroblasts or sensory organ precursor cells. Clueless is expressed during the larval stages and enriched in the neuroblast. clu mutants display a weak but obvious phenotype of mislocalized Miranda and Numb crescent in a small percentage of dividing neuroblast. Deletion of clu in lethal giant larvae (lgl) mutants largely rescues the phenotype of mislocalized Miranda. The brain vi size of clu, lgl double mutant is also considerably smaller than that of lgl mutants. Biochemistry data suggests that this rescue is due to down-regulation of aPKC. This down-regulation of aPKC is independent of transcription and translation and did not rescue the mislocalization of the apical aPKC crescent. Par6-aPKC can form a complex with either Baz or Lgl to exist in either an active or inactive complex. Co-immunoprecipitation of Clu showed that aPKC and Bazooka form a complex with Clu but not Lgl. This result suggests that Clu forms a complex with Par6aPKC-Baz. Clu may be responsible for the stability of the active Par6-aPKC-Baz complex. vii List of Tables Table 1: List of primers used for sequencing . 31 Table 2: List of primers used for production of double stranded oligo DNA 32 Table 3: List of primers used for PCR . 32 Table 4: List of primers used for dsRNA DNA template generation 35 Table 5: List of primers used for real time PCR . 36 Table 6: Fly stocks used in this study . 38 viii List of Figures Figure 1: Image adapted from FlyMove (www. flymove.uni-muenster.de). Life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Figure 2: Image adapted from (Neumüller and Knoblich, 2009). Three different modes of asymmetric cell division: niche derived, external polarity cues and intrinsic asymmetry. . Figure 3: Schematic diagram showing the division of embryonic neuroblasts. Figure 4: Schematic diagram showing Type I and Type II neuroblasts. . Figure 5: Schematic diagram to summarize key players involved in asymmetric cell division of the neuroblast. . 11 Figure 6: Schematic diagram showing the model for phosphorylation of Numb and Mira by the Par complex. . 21 Figure 7: Image source from (Caussinus and Gonzalez, 2005). Demonstration of ability of mutant larval brain to form tumors when injected into adult hosts. . 24 Figure 8: Schematic diagram showing localization of Par complex proteins, Pins and Gαi, cell fate determinants Pon and Numb in the neuroblast and sensory organ precursor . 50 Figure 9: Schematic diagram showing division of SOP to give rise to socket, hair, glial, sheath and neuron cells. 51 Figure 10: RNAi knockdown of clu (CG8443) in adult notum (A, B) and in larval brain neuroblasts (C). 53 Figure 11: Western blot analysis of whole embryonic lysate, whole larval lysate, whole larval brain lysate of yw and clu169. . 55 Figure 12: Anti-Clu (FITC) and anti-Deadpan (Cy3) staining of third instar larval brain of yw (A) and clu169(B). . 56 ix Discussion Potential novel target for cancer therapy The notion of cancer stem cells was coined when various groups of researchers discover that tumors generally consist of two populations of cells, one which is non-tumorigenic and the other which is tumorigenic and is capable of forming tumors in vivo (Al-Hajj et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2004). This indicates that there are two separate population of cells in a tumor, one population which closely resembles differentiated cells and not possess the ability to form tumors when cultured in vivo. The other population, however, closely resembles stem cells and could generate both populations of tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic cells again when cultured in vivo. These cells, termed as tumor initiating cells or cancer stem cells, are suspected to be resistant to many forms of cancer treatment, and may be the root cause of cancer relapse and metastasis in many cancer patients (Florian et al., 2011). While it is unclear if mis-regulation of asymmetric cell division is involved in these tumor initiating cells and tumorigenesis, parallel comparisons drawn between tumors form in both Drosophila and mice due to loss of function in genes involved in asymmetric cell division like Numb, Lgl and Pros have lead us to suspect that these tumor initiating cells have defective asymmetric cell division (Agrawal et al., 1995; Klezovitch et al., 2004; Bello et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006). Most cancer treatment available now mainly targets the differentiated, non-tumorigenic cells that are non-proliferative while tumor initiating cells are resistant to them (Harrison and Lerner, 1991), and we are in need of designing drugs or therapies that are more directed at these tumorigenic cells. Clu may be a potential target for drugs and therapeutics design to target tumor initiating cells and suppress their tumorigenesis process. As presented in this study, loss of Drosophila clu would rescue the mis- 109 | P a g e Discussion regulation of asymmetric cell division caused by loss of tumor suppressor gene, lgl, and this effect is specifically targeted at the neural stem cells. Hence, further studies and characterization could be done to the human homolog of clu, human CLU (KIAA0664) to determine if there is parallel similarities and function between Drosophila clu and human CLU, especially if it is also involved in the asymmetric cell division of any type cancer stem cells. Human CLU may well be a potent target for therapeutics agent to target tumor initiating cells and impede or inhibit their stem cell like proliferative property, and hence be a potential novel target for cancer therapy. 110 | P a g e References References Abou-Sleiman, P. M., Muqit, M. M. and Wood, N. W. (2006) 'Expanding insights of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.', Nat Rev Neurosci 7(3): 207-19. Agrawal, N., Kango, M., Mishra, A. and Sinha, P. (1995) 'Neoplastic transformation and aberrant cell-cell interactions in genetic mosaics of lethal(2)giant larvae (lgl), a tumor suppressor gene of Drosophila.', Dev Biol 172(1): 218-29. Al-Hajj, M., Wicha, M. S., Benito-Hernandez, A., Morrison, S. J. and Clarke, M. F. (2003) 'Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells.', Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(7): 3983-8. Arama, E., Dickman, D., Kimchie, Z., Shearn, A. and Lev, Z. (2000) 'Mutations in the betapropeller domain of the Drosophila brain tumor (brat) protein induce neoplasm in the larval brain.', Oncogene 19(33): 3706-16. Ashburner, M. and Roote, J. (2007) 'Maintenance of a Drosophila laboratory: general procedures.', CSH Protoc 2007: pdb.ip35. Atwood, S. X., Chabu, C., Penkert, R. R., Doe, C. Q. and Prehoda, K. E. (2007) 'Cdc42 acts downstream of Bazooka to regulate neuroblast polarity through Par-6 aPKC.', J Cell Sci 120(Pt 18): 3200-6. Atwood, S. X. and Prehoda, K. E. (2009) 'aPKC phosphorylates Miranda to polarize fate determinants during neuroblast asymmetric cell division.', Curr Biol 19(9): 723-9. Barros, C. S., Phelps, C. B. and Brand, A. H. (2003) 'Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II promotes the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants by cortical exclusion rather than active transport.', Dev Cell 5(6): 829-40. 111 | P a g e References Bellaïche, Y., Radovic, A., Woods, D. F., Hough, C. D., Parmentier, M. L., O'Kane, C. J., Bryant, P. J. and Schweisguth, F. (2001) 'The Partner of Inscuteable/Discs-large complex is required to establish planar polarity during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila.', Cell 106(3): 355-66. Bello, B., Reichert, H. and Hirth, F. (2006) 'The brain tumor gene negatively regulates neural progenitor cell proliferation in the larval central brain of Drosophila.', Development 133(14): 2639-48. Bello, B. C., Izergina, N., Caussinus, E. and Reichert, H. (2008) 'Amplification of neural stem cell proliferation by intermediate progenitor cells in Drosophila brain development.', Neural Dev 3: 5. Berdnik, D., Török, T., González-Gaitán, M. and Knoblich, J. A. (2002) 'The endocytic protein alpha-Adaptin is required for numb-mediated asymmetric cell division in Drosophila.', Dev Cell 3(2): 221-31. Betschinger, J., Mechtler, K. and Knoblich, J. A. (2003) 'The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl.', Nature 422(6929): 326-30. Betschinger, J., Mechtler, K. and Knoblich, J. A. (2006) 'Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells.', Cell 124(6): 1241-53. Bilder, D. (2004) 'Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors.', Genes Dev 18(16): 1909-25. Boone, J. Q. and Doe, C. Q. (2008) 'Identification of Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages containing transit amplifying ganglion mother cells.', Dev Neurobiol 68(9): 118595. 112 | P a g e References Boudny, V. and Kovarik, J. (2002) 'JAK/STAT signaling pathways and cancer. Janus kinases/signal transducers and activators of transcription.', Neoplasma 49(6): 349-55. Bowman, S. K., Neumüller, R. A., Novatchkova, M., Du, Q. and Knoblich, J. A. (2006) 'The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division.', Dev Cell 10(6): 731-42. Bowman, S. K., Rolland, V., Betschinger, J., Kinsey, K. A., Emery, G. and Knoblich, J. A. (2008) 'The tumor suppressors Brat and Numb regulate transit-amplifying neuroblast lineages in Drosophila.', Dev Cell 14(4): 535-46. Bromberg, J. F. (2001) 'Activation of STAT proteins and growth control.', Bioessays 23(2): 161-9. Cabernard, C. and Doe, C. Q. (2009) 'Apical/basal spindle orientation is required for neuroblast homeostasis and neuronal differentiation in Drosophila.', Dev Cell 17(1): 13441. Caussinus, E. and Gonzalez, C. (2005) 'Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster.', Nat Genet 37(10): 1125-9. Cha, G. H., Kim, S., Park, J., Lee, E., Kim, M., Lee, S. B., Kim, J. M., Chung, J. and Cho, K. S. (2005) 'Parkin negatively regulates JNK pathway in the dopaminergic neurons of Drosophila.', Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(29): 10345-50. Chabu, C. and Doe, C. Q. (2009) 'Twins/PP2A regulates aPKC to control neuroblast cell polarity and self-renewal.', Dev Biol 330(2): 399-405. Cherbas, L. and Cherbas, P. (2007) 'Drosophila cell culture and transformation.', CSH Protoc 2007: pdb.top6. 113 | P a g e References Chia, W., Somers, W. G. and Wang, H. (2008) 'Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions: cell cycle regulators, asymmetric protein localization, and tumorigenesis.', J Cell Biol 180(2): 267-72. Chia, W. and Yang, X. (2002) 'Asymmetric division of Drosophila neural progenitors.', Curr Opin Genet Dev 12(4): 459-64. Choksi, S. P., Southall, T. D., Bossing, T., Edoff, K., de Wit, E., Fischer, B. E., van Steensel, B., Micklem, G. and Brand, A. H. (2006) 'Prospero acts as a binary switch between selfrenewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells.', Dev Cell 11(6): 775-89. Cox, R. T. and Spradling, A. C. (2009) 'Clueless, a conserved Drosophila gene required for mitochondrial subcellular localization, interacts genetically with parkin.', Dis Model Mech 2(9-10): 490-9. Datta, S. (1995) 'Control of proliferation activation in quiescent neuroblasts of the Drosophila central nervous system.', Development 121(4): 1173-82. Dietzl, G., Chen, D., Schnorrer, F., Su, K. C., Barinova, Y., Fellner, M., Gasser, B., Kinsey, K., Oppel, S., Scheiblauer, S. et al. (2007) 'A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila.', Nature 448(7150): 151-6. Doe, C. Q. (2008) 'Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation.', Development 135(9): 1575-87. Doe, C. Q., Chu-LaGraff, Q., Wright, D. M. and Scott, M. P. (1991) 'The prospero gene specifies cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system.', Cell 65(3): 451-64. Fields, S. D., Arana, Q., Heuser, J. and Clarke, M. (2002) 'Mitochondrial membrane dynamics are altered in cluA- mutants of Dictyostelium.', J Muscle Res Cell Motil 23(7-8): 829-38. 114 | P a g e References Florian, I. S., Tomuleasa, C., Soritau, O., Timis, T., Ioani, H., Irimie, A. and Kacso, G. (2011) 'Cancer stem cells and malignant gliomas. From pathophysiology to targeted molecular therapy.', J BUON 16(1): 16-23. Fuerstenberg, S., Peng, C. Y., Alvarez-Ortiz, P., Hor, T. and Doe, C. Q. (1998) 'Identification of Miranda protein domains regulating asymmetric cortical localization, cargo binding, and cortical release.', Mol Cell Neurosci 12(6): 325-39. Greene, J. C., Whitworth, A. J., Kuo, I., Andrews, L. A., Feany, M. B. and Pallanck, L. J. (2003) 'Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants.', Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(7): 4078-83. Guo, M., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1996) 'Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch.', Neuron 17(1): 27-41. Harris, R. E., Pargett, M., Sutcliffe, C., Umulis, D. and Ashe, H. L. (2011) 'Brat promotes stem cell differentiation via control of a bistable switch that restricts BMP signaling.', Dev Cell 20(1): 72-83. Harrison, D. E. and Lerner, C. P. (1991) 'Most primitive hematopoietic stem cells are stimulated to cycle rapidly after treatment with 5-fluorouracil.', Blood 78(5): 1237-40. Hirata, J., Nakagoshi, H., Nabeshima, Y. and Matsuzaki, F. (1995) 'Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development.', Nature 377(6550): 627-30. Humbert, P., Russell, S. and Richardson, H. (2003) 'Dlg, Scribble and Lgl in cell polarity, cell proliferation and cancer.', Bioessays 25(6): 542-53. Hutterer, A., Betschinger, J., Petronczki, M. and Knoblich, J. A. (2004) 'Sequential roles of Cdc42, Par-6, aPKC, and Lgl in the establishment of epithelial polarity during Drosophila embryogenesis.', Dev Cell 6(6): 845-54. 115 | P a g e References Hutterer, A. and Knoblich, J. A. (2005) 'Numb and alpha-Adaptin regulate Sanpodo endocytosis to specify cell fate in Drosophila external sensory organs.', EMBO Rep 6(9): 836-42. Ikeshima-Kataoka, H., Skeath, J. B., Nabeshima, Y., Doe, C. Q. and Matsuzaki, F. (1997) 'Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions.', Nature 390(6660): 625-9. Inzelberg, R. and Jankovic, J. (2007) 'Are Parkinson disease patients protected from some but not all cancers?', Neurology 69(15): 1542-50. Itier, J. M., Ibanez, P., Mena, M. A., Abbas, N., Cohen-Salmon, C., Bohme, G. A., Laville, M., Pratt, J., Corti, O., Pradier, L. et al. (2003) 'Parkin gene inactivation alters behaviour and dopamine neurotransmission in the mouse.', Hum Mol Genet 12(18): 2277-91. Ito, K., Awano, W., Suzuki, K., Hiromi, Y. and Yamamoto, D. (1997) 'The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells.', Development 124(4): 761-71. Ito, K. and Hotta, Y. (1992) 'Proliferation pattern of postembryonic neuroblasts in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster.', Dev Biol 149(1): 134-48. Izumi, Y., Ohta, N., Hisata, K., Raabe, T. and Matsuzaki, F. (2006) 'Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization.', Nat Cell Biol 8(6): 586-93. Johnson, K. and Wodarz, A. (2003) 'A genetic hierarchy controlling cell polarity.', Nat Cell Biol 5(1): 12-4. Klezovitch, O., Fernandez, T. E., Tapscott, S. J. and Vasioukhin, V. (2004) 'Loss of cell polarity causes severe brain dysplasia in Lgl1 knockout mice.', Genes Dev 18(5): 559-71. 116 | P a g e References Knoblich, J. A., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1995) 'Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division.', Nature 377(6550): 624-7. Knoblich, J. A., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1997) 'The N terminus of the Drosophila Numb protein directs membrane association and actin-dependent asymmetric localization.', Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(24): 13005-10. Krahn, M. P., Klopfenstein, D. R., Fischer, N. and Wodarz, A. (2010) 'Membrane targeting of Bazooka/PAR-3 is mediated by direct binding to phosphoinositide lipids.', Curr Biol 20(7): 636-42. Kraut, R., Chia, W., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N. and Knoblich, J. A. (1996) 'Role of inscuteable in orienting asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila.', Nature 383(6595): 50-5. Kuchinke, U., Grawe, F. and Knust, E. (1998) 'Control of spindle orientation in Drosophila by the Par-3-related PDZ-domain protein Bazooka.', Curr Biol 8(25): 1357-65. Langevin, J., Le Borgne, R., Rosenfeld, F., Gho, M., Schweisguth, F. and Bellaïche, Y. (2005) 'Lethal giant larvae controls the localization of notch-signaling regulators numb, neuralized, and Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory-organ precursor cells.', Curr Biol 15(10): 955-62. Lee, C. Y., Andersen, R. O., Cabernard, C., Manning, L., Tran, K. D., Lanskey, M. J., Bashirullah, A. and Doe, C. Q. (2006a) 'Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation.', Genes Dev 20(24): 3464-74. Lee, C. Y., Robinson, K. J. and Doe, C. Q. (2006b) 'Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation.', Nature 439(7076): 594-8. 117 | P a g e References Lee, C. Y., Wilkinson, B. D., Siegrist, S. E., Wharton, R. P. and Doe, C. Q. (2006c) 'Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal.', Dev Cell 10(4): 441-9. Lee, T., Lee, A. and Luo, L. (1999) 'Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast.', Development 126(18): 4065-76. Lee, T. and Luo, L. (1999) 'Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis.', Neuron 22(3): 451-61. Li, S. C., Zwahlen, C., Vincent, S. J., McGlade, C. J., Kay, L. E., Pawson, T. and Forman-Kay, J. D. (1998) 'Structure of a Numb PTB domain-peptide complex suggests a basis for diverse binding specificity.', Nat Struct Biol 5(12): 1075-83. Liu, H., Radisky, D. C. and Bissell, M. J. (2005) 'Proliferation and polarity in breast cancer: untying the Gordian knot.', Cell Cycle 4(5): 646-9. Lu, B., Rothenberg, M., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1998) 'Partner of Numb colocalizes with Numb during mitosis and directs Numb asymmetric localization in Drosophila neural and muscle progenitors.', Cell 95(2): 225-35. Matsuzaki, F. (2000) 'Asymmetric division of Drosophila neural stem cells: a basis for neural diversity.', Curr Opin Neurobiol 10(1): 38-44. Matsuzaki, F., Ohshiro, T., Ikeshima-Kataoka, H. and Izumi, H. (1998) 'miranda localizes staufen and prospero asymmetrically in mitotic neuroblasts and epithelial cells in early Drosophila embryogenesis.', Development 125(20): 4089-98. Maurange, C. and Gould, A. P. (2005) 'Brainy but not too brainy: starting and stopping neuroblast divisions in Drosophila.', Trends Neurosci 28(1): 30-6. 118 | P a g e References Mayer, B., Emery, G., Berdnik, D., Wirtz-Peitz, F. and Knoblich, J. A. (2005) 'Quantitative analysis of protein dynamics during asymmetric cell division.', Curr Biol 15(20): 1847-54. Mukherjee, T., Schäfer, U. and Zeidler, M. P. (2006) 'Identification of Drosophila genes modulating Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription signal transduction.', Genetics 172(3): 1683-97. Neumüller, R. A. and Knoblich, J. A. (2009) 'Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer.', Genes Dev 23(23): 2675-99. Ng, C. H., Mok, S. Z., Koh, C., Ouyang, X., Fivaz, M. L., Tan, E. K., Dawson, V. L., Dawson, T. M., Yu, F. and Lim, K. L. (2009) 'Parkin protects against LRRK2 G2019S mutant-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration in Drosophila.', J Neurosci 29(36): 11257-62. Nipper, R. W., Siller, K. H., Smith, N. R., Doe, C. Q. and Prehoda, K. E. (2007) 'Galphai generates multiple Pins activation states to link cortical polarity and spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts.', Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(36): 14306-11. Nishimura, T. and Kaibuchi, K. (2007) 'Numb controls integrin endocytosis for directional cell migration with aPKC and PAR-3.', Dev Cell 13(1): 15-28. O'Connor-Giles, K. M. and Skeath, J. B. (2003) 'Numb inhibits membrane localization of Sanpodo, a four-pass transmembrane protein, to promote asymmetric divisions in Drosophila.', Dev Cell 5(2): 231-43. Ogawa, H., Ohta, N., Moon, W. and Matsuzaki, F. (2009) 'Protein phosphatase 2A negatively regulates aPKC signaling by modulating phosphorylation of Par-6 in Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions.', J Cell Sci 122(Pt 18): 3242-9. Ohshiro, T., Yagami, T., Zhang, C. and Matsuzaki, F. (2000) 'Role of cortical tumoursuppressor proteins in asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblast.', Nature 408(6812): 593-6. 119 | P a g e References Pesah, Y., Pham, T., Burgess, H., Middlebrooks, B., Verstreken, P., Zhou, Y., Harding, M., Bellen, H. and Mardon, G. (2004) 'Drosophila parkin mutants have decreased mass and cell size and increased sensitivity to oxygen radical stress.', Development 131(9): 2183-94. Peterson, F. C., Penkert, R. R., Volkman, B. F. and Prehoda, K. E. (2004) 'Cdc42 regulates the Par-6 PDZ domain through an allosteric CRIB-PDZ transition.', Mol Cell 13(5): 665-76. Petritsch, C., Tavosanis, G., Turck, C. W., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (2003) 'The Drosophila myosin VI Jaguar is required for basal protein targeting and correct spindle orientation in mitotic neuroblasts.', Dev Cell 4(2): 273-81. Petronczki, M. and Knoblich, J. A. (2001) 'DmPAR-6 directs epithelial polarity and asymmetric cell division of neuroblasts in Drosophila.', Nat Cell Biol 3(1): 43-9. Reiter, L. T., Potocki, L., Chien, S., Gribskov, M. and Bier, E. (2001) 'A systematic analysis of human disease-associated gene sequences in Drosophila melanogaster.', Genome Res 11(6): 1114-25. Reymond, A., Meroni, G., Fantozzi, A., Merla, G., Cairo, S., Luzi, L., Riganelli, D., Zanaria, E., Messali, S., Cainarca, S. et al. (2001) 'The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments.', EMBO J 20(9): 2140-51. Rhyu, M. S., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1994) 'Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells.', Cell 76(3): 477-91. Roegiers, F., Younger-Shepherd, S., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (2001) 'Two types of asymmetric divisions in the Drosophila sensory organ precursor cell lineage.', Nat Cell Biol 3(1): 58-67. 120 | P a g e References Rolls, M. M., Albertson, R., Shih, H. P., Lee, C. Y. and Doe, C. Q. (2003) 'Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia.', J Cell Biol 163(5): 1089-98. Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. W. (2006) The condensed protocols from molecular cloning : a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Santolini, E., Puri, C., Salcini, A. E., Gagliani, M. C., Pelicci, P. G., Tacchetti, C. and Di Fiore, P. P. (2000) 'Numb is an endocytic protein.', J Cell Biol 151(6): 1345-52. Schaefer, M., Shevchenko, A. and Knoblich, J. A. (2000) 'A protein complex containing Inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila.', Curr Biol 10(7): 353-62. Scheufler, C., Brinker, A., Bourenkov, G., Pegoraro, S., Moroder, L., Bartunik, H., Hartl, F. U. and Moarefi, I. (2000) 'Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine.', Cell 101(2): 199-210. Schober, M., Schaefer, M. and Knoblich, J. A. (1999) 'Bazooka recruits Inscuteable to orient asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila neuroblasts.', Nature 402(6761): 548-51. Shen, C. P., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1997) 'Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila.', Cell 90(3): 449-58. Shen, C. P., Knoblich, J. A., Chan, Y. M., Jiang, M. M., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1998) 'Miranda as a multidomain adapter linking apically localized Inscuteable and basally localized Staufen and Prospero during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila.', Genes Dev 12(12): 1837-46. Siegrist, S. E. and Doe, C. Q. (2006) 'Extrinsic cues orient the cell division axis in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts.', Development 133(3): 529-36. 121 | P a g e References Siller, K. H., Cabernard, C. and Doe, C. Q. (2006) 'The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts.', Nat Cell Biol 8(6): 594600. Singh, S. K., Hawkins, C., Clarke, I. D., Squire, J. A., Bayani, J., Hide, T., Henkelman, R. M., Cusimano, M. D. and Dirks, P. B. (2004) 'Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells.', Nature 432(7015): 396-401. Smith, C. A., Lau, K. M., Rahmani, Z., Dho, S. E., Brothers, G., She, Y. M., Berry, D. M., Bonneil, E., Thibault, P., Schweisguth, F. et al. (2007) 'aPKC-mediated phosphorylation regulates asymmetric membrane localization of the cell fate determinant Numb.', EMBO J 26(2): 468-80. Sonoda, J. and Wharton, R. P. (2001) 'Drosophila Brain Tumor is a translational repressor.', Genes Dev 15(6): 762-73. Sousa-Nunes, R., Chia, W. and Somers, W. G. (2009) 'Protein phosphatase mediates localization of the Miranda complex during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions.', Genes Dev 23(3): 359-72. Tio, M., Udolph, G., Yang, X. and Chia, W. (2001) 'cdc2 links the Drosophila cell cycle and asymmetric division machineries.', Nature 409(6823): 1063-7. Truman, J. W. (1990) 'Metamorphosis of the central nervous system of Drosophila.', J Neurobiol 21(7): 1072-84. Ui, K., Nishihara, S., Sakuma, M., Togashi, S., Ueda, R., Miyata, Y. and Miyake, T. (1994) 'Newly established cell lines from Drosophila larval CNS express neural specific characteristics.', In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 30A(4): 209-16. Urbach, R. and Technau, G. M. (2004) 'Neuroblast formation and patterning during early brain development in Drosophila.', Bioessays 26(7): 739-51. 122 | P a g e References Vornlocher, H. P., Hanachi, P., Ribeiro, S. and Hershey, J. W. (1999) 'A 110-kilodalton subunit of translation initiation factor eIF3 and an associated 135-kilodalton protein are encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TIF32 and TIF31 genes.', J Biol Chem 274(24): 16802-12. Wang, C., Chang, K. C., Somers, G., Virshup, D., Ang, B. T., Tang, C., Yu, F. and Wang, H. (2009) 'Protein phosphatase 2A regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neural stem cells.', Development 136(13): 2287-96. Wang, H., Ouyang, Y., Somers, W. G., Chia, W. and Lu, B. (2007) 'Polo inhibits progenitor self-renewal and regulates Numb asymmetry by phosphorylating Pon.', Nature 449(7158): 96-100. Wang, H., Somers, G. W., Bashirullah, A., Heberlein, U., Yu, F. and Chia, W. (2006) 'Aurora-A acts as a tumor suppressor and regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neuroblasts.', Genes Dev 20(24): 3453-63. Weston, C. R. and Davis, R. J. (2002) 'The JNK signal transduction pathway.', Curr Opin Genet Dev 12(1): 14-21. Wirtz-Peitz, F., Nishimura, T. and Knoblich, J. A. (2008) 'Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization.', Cell 135(1): 161-73. Wodarz, A., Ramrath, A., Grimm, A. and Knust, E. (2000) 'Drosophila atypical protein kinase C associates with Bazooka and controls polarity of epithelia and neuroblasts.', J Cell Biol 150(6): 1361-74. Woodhouse, E., Hersperger, E., Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., Liotta, L. A. and Shearn, A. (1994) 'Increased type IV collagenase in lgl-induced invasive tumors of Drosophila.', Cell Growth Differ 5(2): 151-9. 123 | P a g e References Wu, M., Kwon, H. Y., Rattis, F., Blum, J., Zhao, C., Ashkenazi, R., Jackson, T. L., Gaiano, N., Oliver, T. and Reya, T. (2007) 'Imaging hematopoietic precursor division in real time.', Cell Stem Cell 1(5): 541-54. Yamashita, Y. (2009) 'Asymmetric stem cell division and pathology: insights from Drosophila stem cell systems.', J Pathol 217(2): 181-5. Younossi-Hartenstein, A., Nassif, C., Green, P. and Hartenstein, V. (1996) 'Early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain.', J Comp Neurol 370(3): 313-29. Yu, F., Cai, Y., Kaushik, R., Yang, X. and Chia, W. (2003) 'Distinct roles of Galphai and Gbeta13F subunits of the heterotrimeric G protein complex in the mediation of Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions.', J Cell Biol 162(4): 623-33. Yu, F., Morin, X., Cai, Y., Yang, X. and Chia, W. (2000) 'Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a novel player of Drosophila asymmetric divisions, reveals two distinct steps in inscuteable apical localization.', Cell 100(4): 399-409. Yu, F., Wang, H., Qian, H., Kaushik, R., Bownes, M., Yang, X. and Chia, W. (2005) 'Locomotion defects, together with Pins, regulates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions.', Genes Dev 19(11): 1341-53. 124 | P a g e [...]... particularly important in stem cells where asymmetric cell division of the stem cell would produce two distinct daughter cells: one committed cell or differentiated cell and another which remained as a stem cell This stem cell can undergo the same process to produce more committed or differentiated cells while it itself remained as a pluripotent cell Asymmetric cell division can arise from three different... 30-60 days 3|Page Introduction Asymmetric cell division Asymmetric cell division is an important cellular process whereby a single cell divides via mitosis to two different daughter cells While symmetric divisions give rise to two daughter cells that are exactly identical, asymmetric cell division generates two daughter cells that can be different in size, cellular or protein contents, and/ or differentiation... by the lack of nuclear Asense and cytoplasmic Prospero, also divides asymmetrically to regenerate itself and to produce a smaller cell This smaller cell, unlike the GMC formed in asymmetric division of the Type I neuroblasts, have the capability to divide numerous times Termed as intermediate progenitors or transit amplifying cell, the smaller cell produced by asymmetric cell division of the Type II... amplifying cell can further divide asymmetrically to regenerate itself as well as to produce a GMC 9|Page Introduction Asymmetric cell division in neuroblast Asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila neuroblasts enables a single cell to divide and give rise to two cells with very distinct fate Many molecular switches and machineries are required to facilitate this process Asymmetric cell division in... components of the machineries had been identified Many of the key players of asymmetric cell division identified in embryonic neuroblasts were also found to be conserved in the larval brain neuroblasts (Figure 5) These key players are mainly involved in one or more of the following processes: setting up cell polarity, orientation of the mitotic spindle, and asymmetric segregation of the cell fate determinants... two daughter cells which arise from a single neuroblast involves many cellular processes, interaction and cross-talk between the molecules which are highly regulated Asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants As discussed earlier, the ultimate aim of asymmetric cell division is to segregate the cell fate determinants to only the basal GMC For this segregation to be complete, the cell fate determinants... attract one of the spindle poles, allowing the spindle to align to the apical-basal axis set up by the Par complex Asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants The ultimate aim of setting up cell polarity and aligning mitotic spindle to the apicalbasal axis such that the cleavage plane of the cell is orthogonal to the apical-basal axis is to ensure that there is basal localization of cell fate determinants... key steps of asymmetric cell division in neuroblasts are to set up the apical-basal polarity of the cell and to align the mitotic spindle along the apical-basal axis This set-up then directs cell fate determinants to localize to the basal cortex and is asymmetrically segregated during mitosis so that only the basal GMC would receive the 16 | P a g e Introduction cell fate determinants The cell fate... to inhibit cell growth and renewal of the GMC, promoting its exit of the cell cycle and differentiation Hence, the larger cell at the apical side which does not receive these cell fate determinants remains as a neuroblast while the GMC at the basal side which receives these cell fate determinants would exit the cell cycle and commits itself to differentiate The generation of these distinct cell fates... mitosis, both cells are similar However, due to differences in their environment, only one cell would receive the signal to remain as a stem cell (Figure 2A) For the external polarity cues mechanism, on the other hand, the cell relies on the polarity of the external environment to induce asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants within the cell (Figure 2B) Last but not least, cells which divide . in stem cells where asymmetric cell division of the stem cell would produce two distinct daughter cells: one committed cell or differentiated cell and another which remained as a stem cell. This. Asymmetric cell division in neuroblast 10 Setting up cell polarity 11 Mitotic spindle orientation 13 Asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants 14 Asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants. dissection 40 Pupal nota dissection 40 Cell line manipulation 41 General maintenance of cell line 41 RNAi treatment of cells 41 iv Transfection of cells 42 Biochemistry 42 Antibodies

Ngày đăng: 10/09/2015, 08:33

Xem thêm: Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

Mục lục

    Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for study

    Drosophila neuroblasts in neurogenesis

    Asymmetric cell division in neuroblast

    Setting up cell polarity

    Asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants

    Asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants

    Localizing the cell fate determinants by apical exclusion

    aPKC substrate specificity is linked with cell cycle

    Lgl as a molecular buffer

    Other regulators of asymmetric cell division

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN