NGHIÊN CỨU VỀ TÍNH THỰC TIỄN CỦA HỒ SƠ BÀI VIẾT DÀNH CHO SINH VIÊN NĂM 2, TỔ CHẤT LƯỢNG CAO, KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM, ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ, ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI

150 1.1K 2
NGHIÊN CỨU VỀ TÍNH THỰC TIỄN CỦA HỒ SƠ BÀI VIẾT DÀNH CHO SINH VIÊN NĂM 2, TỔ CHẤT LƯỢNG CAO, KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM, ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ, ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

Authenticity is one of the important qualities making portfolios a powerful method of writing assessment. As one of the pioneers in foreign language education, FastTrack division at FELTE, ULIS (University of Languages and International Study) has made attempt to improve writing assessment standard by including portfolios in the writing courses. To meet the goal of this activity, it is, therefore, necessary that authenticity goes hand in hand with such method. Nevertheless, that how the quality is evaluated is unspecified. To tackle this problem, the present study aims at building a framework for authentic writing portfolios, then applying that framework to investigate the authenticity of the writing portfolios for the second year fasttrack students at ULIS, VNU. Four phases with three qualitative methods were employed for wellrounded results. The findings indicated that the framework for authentic writing portfolios should include five main dimensions: Tasks, goals, context, assessment criteria, and roles of assessors. With regard to the writing portfolios for the second year fasttrack students at ULIS, VNU, the authenticity was demonstrated to a certain extent, yet some improvements were still needed. The study hopefully will benefit researchers and teachers who are interested in the same topic. Key Words: Language assessment, authenticity, writing competence, and writing portfolios.

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI University of Languages and International Studies FACULTY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATION PAPER AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE WRITING PORTFOLIOS FOR THE 2ND YEAR FAST-TRACK STUDENTS IN THE SECOND SEMESTER AT FELTE, ULIS, VNU Supervisor: Duong Thu Mai, PhD Student: Nguyen Dieu Hong Course: QH2010.F1.E2 Ha Noi, May 2014 ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM KHỐ LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP NGHIÊN CỨU VỀ TÍNH THỰC TIỄN CỦA HỒ SƠ BÀI VIẾT DÀNH CHO SINH VIÊN NĂM 2, TỔ CHẤT LƯỢNG CAO, KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM, ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ, ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI Giáo viên hướng dẫn: Tiến sĩ Dương Thu Mai Sinh viên: Nguyễn Diệu Hồng Khoá: QH2010.F1.E2 HÀ NỘI – THÁNG NĂM 2014 ACCEPTANCE I hereby state that I: Nguyen Dieu Hong, QH2010.E2, being a candidate for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (TEFL) accept the requirements of the College relating to the retention and use of Bachelor’s Graduation Paper deposited in the library In terms of these conditions, I agree that the origin of my paper deposited in the library should be accessible for the purposes of study and research, in accordance with the normal conditions established by the librarian for the care, loan or reproduction of the paper Signature May, 2014 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To complete this graduation paper, I would like to express my gratitude to: • My supervisor, Dr Duong Thu Mai as I have always been and will always be thankful to her I highly appreciate her for the constant, unfailing support during my study While providing me with critical, constructive comments she has respected my autonomy in the way I chose the topic Although rarely did I receive her words of encouragement she has always been there for me at the worst moments of my research journey • Mrs Dinh Hai Yen, who provided me with endless support during my data collection process • Mr Nguyen Chi Duc for his helpfulness, kindness and inspiration • All of my participants who have always been the decisive factors in the completion of this paper • My parents for their unconditional love and support • My younger brother and my best friends, who have always stood by my side, believed in me and raised me up whenever I lost faith in myself Without all their support and cooperation, this thesis would not have been possible i ABSTRACT Authenticity is one of the important qualities making portfolios a powerful method of writing assessment As one of the pioneers in foreign language education, Fast-Track division at FELTE, ULIS (University of Languages and International Study) has made attempt to improve writing assessment standard by including portfolios in the writing courses To meet the goal of this activity, it is, therefore, necessary that authenticity goes hand in hand with such method Nevertheless, that how the quality is evaluated is unspecified To tackle this problem, the present study aims at building a framework for authentic writing portfolios, then applying that framework to investigate the authenticity of the writing portfolios for the second- year fast-track students at ULIS, VNU Four phases with three qualitative methods were employed for well-rounded results The findings indicated that the framework for authentic writing portfolios should include five main dimensions: Tasks, goals, context, assessment criteria, and roles of assessors With regard to the writing portfolios for the second- year fast-track students at ULIS, VNU, the authenticity was demonstrated to a certain extent, yet some improvements were still needed The study hopefully will benefit researchers and teachers who are interested in the same topic Key Words: Language assessment, authenticity, writing competence, and writing portfolios ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .1 CHAPTER 2: LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT, AUTHENTICITY AND WRITING PORTFOLIO .7 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .35 4.1 FINDINGS FROM DOCUMENT ANALYSIS 49 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 76 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 85 APPENDICES 87 REFERENCES 126 LISTS OF TABLES, FIGURES AND ABBREVIATIONS TABLES PAGE Table Task characteristic (Bachman & Palmer, 1996) 88 Table Authenticity in writing portfolios 51 FIGURES PAGE Figure 1: Measurement, tests and evaluation (Bachman, 1990) Figure 2: Authenticity (Bachman& Palmer, 1996) 12 iii Figure 3: Five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment (Gulikers, Bastiaens & Kirschner, 2004) Figure 4: Research procedure 89 35 Figure 5: Classification of authentic tasks (Brown & Menasche, 2005) 56 Figure 6: A framework for analyzing communicative tasks (Nunan, 1989) 76 Figure 7: Authenticity in Writing Portfolios ABBREVIATIONS EFL : English as a Foreign Language ESL : English as a Second Language FELTE : Faculty of English Language Teacher Education VNU : Vietnam National University ULIS : University of Languages and International Studies iv 77 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM AND RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY With numerous conflicting theories concerning writing, writing assessment has undergone immense changes throughout centuries In the past, writing was taught based on product-oriented approach in which “students are encouraged to mimic a model text, usually is presented and analyzed at an early stage” (Gabrielatos, 2002, p.5) Consequently, timed testing seemed to be an appropriate method to assess students’ writing capacity Then, the notion that writing is a process was introduced Kroll (2001) has defined this view as follows: The “process approach” serves today as an umbrella term for many types of writing courses What the term captures is the fact that student writers engage in their writing tasks through a cyclical approach rather than a single-shot approach They are not expected to produce and submit complete and polished responses to their writing assignments without going through stages of drafting and receiving feedback on their draft, be it from peers and/or from the teacher, followed by revision of their evolving texts (p 220) In other words, the progress of brainstorming ideas, drafting, reviewing and editing are essential in writing Consequently, it is more difficult to assess EFL students’ writing abilities than native speakers’ in timed writing assessment (John, 1991) Conforming to this point, Song and August (2002) point out that a set time during a writing test does affect test takers’ simultaneous concentration on L2 writing needed skills and culturally related issues in the process of writing From this perspective, traditional timed testing seemed to be inadequate in writing assessment The need for a supplementary assessment method leads to the born of writing portfolios While standardized tests are incapable of reflecting a complete picture of students’ needs and learning, writing portfolios are proved to be very useful Hamp-Lyons and Condon (2000) hold that “portfolio provide a broader measure of what students can do, and because they replace the timed writing context, which has long been claimed to be particularly discriminatory against nonnative writers” (p 61) In addition, by applying portfolios, the student-centered concept of teaching will take priority over the traditional one (Lee, 2000) Due to the crucial role of portfolios in teaching and learning writing, it is hardly surprising that many research topics have been conducted surrounding these assessment method Some concentrate on the relationship between writing portfolios and learners “The Effects of portfolio assessment on Writing of EFL Students” (Netzakatgoo, 2010) is a salient example The findings of that study are used to determine the effect of portfolio assessment on the final examination scores of EFL students respecting writing skill Others, for instance “A qualitative research on Portfolio Keeping in English as a Foreign Language Writing” (Aydin, 2010), tend to deepen into the contributions of portfolios to the language development of a specific group like pre-service teachers or Korean ESL students The qualities of portfolios also receive much concern To illustrate, Hamp-Lyons & Condon (2000) believe that in writing portfolios both, reliability and validity are necessary and must be taken into consideration Therefore, substantial studies have been carried out in this aspect, for example, Joan, Maryl and Eva (2010) As mentioned above, a wide variety of topics regarding writing portfolios have been chosen, but there are still some gaps It is held by some researchers that portfolio assessment is one form of authentic assessment (Hart, 1994) However, Arter and Spandel (1992) point out one of the problems arising when using portfolios as assessment devices is the possibility of lacking authenticity Although there are controversial opinions surrounding this quality, little attention has been paid to it In the Vietnamese context, the term “authenticity” of language assessment in general and portfolios in particular is still new to a large number of teachers and learners Even at ULIS, VNU (Vietnam National University, University of Languages and International Studyies) where EFL students need to build writing portfolios in English every year, hardly could readers find any official studies about the authenticity of such assessment method It is, hence, necessary to produce more research on that field Additionally, in the current semester (semester 2, 20132014), the 2nd year fast-track students at FELTE, ULIS, VNU has experienced a new type of writing portfolios of which course designers have high expectations Owing to the fact that authenticity was of essence in writing portfolios (Estrem, 2004), evaluating the authenticity of those portfolios might offer some contributions to the development of the writing course All of the above mentioned reasons have led to researcher’s decision on conducting a study entitled: “An investigation into the authenticity of the writing portfolios for the 2nd year Fast-track students in the second semester at FELTE, ULIS, VNU” 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY This study aimed at building a framework to evaluate authenticity in writing portfolios and then investigating the authenticity of the writing portfolios for the second- year fast-track students at ULIS, VNU based on that framework Thus, the research focuses on two questions: - What aspects of the authenticity need to be demonstrated in writing portfolios? - From the teacher perspective, which aspects of authenticity are demonstrated in the writing portfolios for the 2nd year Fast-Track students in the second semester at FELTE, ULIS, VNU? Clark J.L.D (1983) Language testing: Past and current status, directions for the future Modern language journal, 67,431-443 Clark, D.F (1989) Communicative theory and its influence on materials production Language Teaching, 22(2), 73-86 Cochran, M., & Patton, M Q (2002) A guide to suing Qualitative Research Methodology New York: Medecins Sans Frontieres Cohen, D (2006) Qualitative Research Guidelines Project Semi-structured interviews New Jersey: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Cowie, B., & Bell, B (1996) A model of formative assessment in science education Assessment in Education, 6(1), 102-116 D’ Aoust, C (1992) Portfolios: Process for students and teachers In K B Yancey (Ed.), Portfolios in the writing classroom (pp 39-48) Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J & Falk, B (1995) Authentic Assessment in Action New York Chicago: Aldine Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y (2005) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Dickinson, L (1992) Learner autonomy Dublin: Authentik Dochy, F., Segers, M and Sluijsmans, D (1999) The Use of Self-, Peer- and Coassessment in Higher Education: A review Studies in Higher Education 24(3), 331-350 Duffy, J R (1995) Why differential diagnosis? Special Interest Division 2, Newsletter, 5, 2–6 129 Duncan, A & Dunn, W (1989) What primary teachers should know about Assessment London: Hodder & Stoughton Dyson, A H (1995) Writing children: Reinventing the development of childhood literacy Written Communication, 12, 4-46 Enghag, M & Nieadderer, H (2008) Two dimensions of Student Ownership Learning During Small-Group work in Physics Science and Mathematics Education, (4) 629-653 Estrem H 2004 The Portfolio's Shifting Self: Possibilities for Assessing Student Learning Pedagogy, 4, 125-128 Evans, N., K.J Hartshorn, R McCollum, & M Wolfersberger (2010) Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445 -463 Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E (2004) Evaluating performance feedback: A research study into issues of credibility and utility for nursing clinicians Contemporary Nurse, 17(1/2), 137-148 Flexner, S B., (Ed.) (1987) The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd edition Random House: New York Frey, B.B (2012) Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment, 17(2), 2-14 Gabrielatos, C (2002) EFL writing: product and process Retrieved February 7, 2014, from http:// www.garielatos.com/Writing.pdf Gatbonton, E., & Gu, G (1994) Preparing and implementing a task-based ESL curriculum in an EFL setting: Implications for theory and practice TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 9-29 130 Gipps, C (1999) Social-cultural aspects of assessment Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-92 Gottlieb, M (1995) Nurturing Student Learning Through Portfolios TESOL Journal, 12-14 Grellet, F., Maley, A., & Welssing, W (1983) Quartet, Teacher’s: Book Oxford: Oxford University Press Wallace, J (1992) A framework for task-based learning Harlow: Longman Guariento, W & Morley, J (2001).Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom ELT Journal 55(4), 347-353 Gulikers, T M., Bastiaens, T J & Kirschner, P A (2004) A five-dimensional framework for authentic Assessment ETR&D, 52(3), 67-86 Hamp-Lyons, L (2003) Writing teachers as assessors of writing, Exploring the Dynamics of second Language Writing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W (2000) Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice,theory, and research Cresskill: Hampton Press Hancock, C.R (Ed.) (1994) Teaching, testing, and assessing: Making the connection Northeast Conference Reports Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co Hancock, C.R (Ed.) (1994) Teaching, testing, and assessing: Making the connection Northeast Conference Reports Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co 131 Hart, D (1994) Authentic assessment: A handbook for education Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Heilenman, L, K (1990) Self-assessment of second language ability: The role of response effects Language Testing, 7, 174-201 Herrington, J., & Herrington, A (1998) Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 305-322 Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C and Oliver, R (2006) Authentic Tasks Online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology Distance Education, 27 (2) pp 233-247 Hirvela, A & Sweetland, Y.L (2005) Two case studies of L2 writers’ experiences across learning-directed portfolio contexts Assessing Writing, 10 (3), 192213 Hovland, M (2013) Learning Objectives: Building a Solid Foundation for Your Course Faculty ecommons Retrieved from http://facultyecommons.org/quality-learning-objectives/ http: // www.cal.org/resources/digest/0110anderson.html https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/46640/Qual_Methods_in_Highe r_Ed_Policy_Analysis-GT_Publication.pdf?sequence=1 Huba, M E and Freed, J E (2000) Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning Boston: Needham Heights In Hamp-Lyons, L (Ed.) Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp 227-240) Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation 132 Joan L H., Maryl, G., & Eva, L B (2010) Assessing Writing Portfolios: issues in the Validity and Meaning of Scores Educational Assessment (pp 201-224) Retrieved from Taylor Francis Online database Johns, A M (1991) Interpreting an English competency examination Written communication, 8, 379-401 Johnson, D., Johnson, R (1999) Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.Boston: Allyn and Bacon Johnson, D., Johnson, R.& Holubec, E (1998) Cooperation in the classroom Boston: Allyn and Bacon Johnson, D., Johnson, R.& Holubec, E (1998) Cooperation in the classroom Boston: Allyn and Bacon Joy, J J L (2011) The duality of authenticity in ELT The Journal of Language and Kingore, B (2007) Assessment: Time-Saving Procedures for Busy Teachers, 4th ed Austin: Professional Associates Publishing Kroll, B (Ed.) (1990) Second language writing: research insights for the classroom Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Le, T.A (Ed.) (2012) An Introduction to Research Methodology in Foreign Language Education Hanoi: ULIS Lee, K (2000) Teaching materials and methods of comprehensive activity fields Taipei: Shin-Lee Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 7-23 Lindsay Prior (2003) Using Documents in Social Research New Delhi, India: SAGE 133 Lutze-Mann, L (2014) Peer Assessment of Assignment Drafts: Louise LutzeMann Retrieved from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/printpdf/544 Lynch, K (2001) Creating a Dialogue between Sociological and Egalitarian Theory in Education International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(3), 237260 Madaus, G & Kellaghan, T (1992) The Effects of Standardized Testing Boston: Kluwer Meyer, C (1992) What’s the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39-40 Mogalakwe, M (1994) The State and Organized Labour in Botswana 1966-1990: Liberal Democracy in Emergent Capitalism (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Murphy, M R (2000) The validity of a portfolio approach to instruction and assessment in writing in the primary school (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University, 2000) Retrieved from http://doras.dcu.ie/19123/1/Regina_M_Murphy_20130620151905.pdf Murphy, S (1994a) Portfolios and curriculum reform: Patterns in practice Assessing Writing, 1, 175-206 Murphy, S (1994a) Portfolios and curriculum reform: Patterns in practice Assessing Writing, 1, 175-206 Netzakatgoo, B (2010) The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Writing of EFL Students (PhD Candidate, Allameh Tabatabie University, 2010) Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/elt.vn42p231 Nezakatgo, B (2011) The effect of Portfolio Assessment on Writing of EFL students English Language Teaching, 4(2), 231-241 134 Nitko, A.J (2001) Educational Assessment of Students United States of America: Jeffery W Johnston Nunan, D (1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom Cambridge: Cambridge University Press O’Leary, M., Shiel, G., & Forde, P (1995) Towards A System of Pupil Profiling For Irish Primary Schools Retrieved from http://doras.dcu.ie/19123/1/Regina20130620151905.pdf Oskarsson, M (1984) Self-assessment of Foreign Language Skills: A Survey of Research and Development Work Council for Cultural Cooperation, Strasbourg, France (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 256 172) Owen, G T (2013) Qualitative Methods in Higher Education Policy Analysis: Using Interviews and Document Analysis Georgia Inst of Technology, 122 Retrieved from Paulson, F.L., Paulson, P.R., & Meyer, C A (1991) What makes a portfolio a portfolios? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63 Payne, G., & Payne, J (2004) Key Concepts in Social Research London: Sage Publications Pierson, H (2000) Learner-directed Assessment in ESL London: New Jersey Purpura, J (2004) Assessing grammar Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Reeves, T.C., & Okey, J.R (1996) Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments In B.G Wilson (Ed.) Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp 191-202) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications 135 Resnick, L, B (1987) The nature of literacy: An historical exploration DP Resnick, Harvard Educational Review, 47 (3), 370-385 Richards, D and Smith, M J (2002) Governance and Public Policy in the UK Oxford: Oxford University Press Rothman, R (1990) Ford study urges new test system to "open gates of opportunity" Boston: Houghton Mifflin Savery, J., & Duffy, T (1995) Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371 Scriven, M (1967) The methodology of evaluation In R E Stake (Ed.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol 1, pp 39-55) Chicago: Rand McNally Secondary School Principals Segers, M., & Dochy, F (2001) New assessment forms in problem-based learning: the value-added of the students’ perspective Studies in Higher Education, 26, 327-339 Silva, T., & Matsuda, P K (Eds.) (2001) On second language writing Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Slovin, J, B (2001) Portfolio analysis Educational assessment, 1(1), 27-53 Smede, Shelly D (1995) Flyfishing, Portfolios, and Authentic Writing English Journal, 84, 92-94 Smith, M.A (1993) Writing without testing In P.Belanoff & M Dickson (Eds.), Portfolios: Process and product (pp 279-291) Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Warwick, United Kingdom 136 Solent University (2014) Reflective thinking and writing UK: Guest user Song, B., & August, B (2002) Using portfolio to Assess the Writing of ESL Students: A powerful Alternative Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 49-72 Sweller, J., Merrienboer, B & Pass, E (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving Effects on learning, 12, 257-285 Sweller, Merrienboer & Pass, 1998 Syahid, A (2009) A comparative study on teaching writing by paper based portfolio learning and electronic portfolio learning reviewed from writing interest (Master of degree dissertation, Sebelas Maret University, 2009), Retrieved from http://vi.scribd.com/doc/19014388/Thesis-Proposal-by- Syahid Tierney, R., Cater, M., & Desai, L (1991) Portfolio assessment in the readingwriting classroom Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Torrance, H (1995) Evaluating authentic assessment Buckingham, UK: Open University Press Valencia, S, & Pearson, P (1987) Reading assessment: Time for a change The Reading Teacher, 40, 726-732 Van Merrienboer, J, J, G (1997) Training complex cognitive skills: A fourcomponent instructional design model for technical training Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication Van Merriënboer, J J G (1997) Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A FourComponent Instructional Design Model for Technical Training Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications 137 Vygotsky, L S (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Wallace, J (1992) A framework for task-based learning Harlow: Longman Weigle Cushing, S (2002) Assessing Writing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Weiser, I (1992) Portfolio practice and assessment for collegiate basic writers In K B Yancey (Ed.), Portfolios in the writing classroom (pp 89-101) Urbana, IL: NCTE Dellinger, D (1993) Portfolio assessment: Getting started New York: Scholastic Weiss, C H (1972) Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Wiggins, G P (1993) Assessing student performance San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers Wolfe, E W., & Miller, T R (1997) Barriers to the implementation of portfolio assessment in secondary education Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 235-251 Wood, D., Bruner, J S., & Ross, G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100 Wood, R (1993) The agenda for educational measurement In Nuttall, D (Ed.), Assessing Educational Achievement London: The Falmer Press 138 Yagelski, R P (1997) Portfolios as way to encourage reflective practice among preservice English teachers In K B Yancey (Ed.), Situating portfolios (pp 225-243) Logan: Utan State University Press Yancey, K.B (1999) Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment CCC 50 3,483-503 Yin, R K (1994) Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 139 ...ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM KHOÁ LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP NGHIÊN CỨU VỀ TÍNH THỰC TIỄN CỦA HỒ SƠ BÀI VIẾT DÀNH CHO SINH VIÊN NĂM 2, TỔ CHẤT LƯỢNG CAO, KHOA. .. LƯỢNG CAO, KHOA TIẾNG ANH SƯ PHẠM, ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ, ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI Giáo viên hướng dẫn: Tiến sĩ Dương Thu Mai Sinh viên: Nguyễn Diệu Hồng Khoá: QH2010.F1.E2 HÀ NỘI – THÁNG NĂM 2014 ACCEPTANCE... collection of the writer’s own work over a period of time, usually a semester or school year” (p 29) Additionally, Yancey (19 92, cited in Park, n.d) points out: 19 A portfolio is a collection of work,

Ngày đăng: 22/09/2014, 07:12

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • 1.1. STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM AND RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY

  • 1.2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY.

  • 1.3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY.

  • 1.4. SIGNIFICANCE

  • 1.5. METHODS OF THE STUDY

  • 1.6. AN OVERVIEW OF THE REST OF THE PAPER

  • 2.1. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT

    • 2.1.1. Key Concepts

    • 2.1.1.1 Assessment

      • 2.1.1.2. Test

      • 2.1.1.3 Measurement

      • 2.1.1.4. Evaluation

      • 2.1.2 A Brief Sketch of Language Assessment History and Modern language Assessment Trends.

      • 2.2. AUTHENTICITY IN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT

        • 2.2.1. Authenticity in Language Education

        • 2.2.2. Authenticity in Language Assessment.

        • 2.3. WRITING PORTFOLIOS

          • 2.3.1. Writing

            • 2.3.1.1 Definition of writing and writing competence

            • 2.3.1.2 Writing assessment methods

            • 2.3.2. Writing Portfolios

              • 2.3.2.1 Definition of writing portfolios

              • 2.3.2.2 Advantages of writing portfolios

              • 2.2.3.3 Issues in writing portfolio implementation

              • 2.3. TOWARD A FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS WRITING PORTFOLIO AUTHENTICITY

                • 2.3.1. Authentic Instruction

                  • 2.3.1.3 Authentic social context

                  • 2.3.1.4 Authentic learning goals

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan