DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY - PART 2 pot

Cell Proliferation in the Developing Mammalian Brain • Chapter 2 35 some portion of which survive, migrate into the granule cell layer, form connections, and become a permanent part of the dentate gyrus granule cell layer (Bayer, 1982; Bayer et al., 1982; Crespo et al., 1986; Stanfield and Trice, 1988) and exhibit impor- tant functional properties (van Praag et al., 2002). Importantly, it has been shown that during the adult period the number of granule cells increases (Bayer, 1982; Bayer et al., 1982), the newly produced granule cells displace earlier generated granule cells (Crespo et al., 1986), and they grow an axon into the mole- cular layer of CA3 (Stanfield and Trice, 1988). In recent years, this proliferative population has been studied as an example of postnatal neurogenesis and stem cell proliferations. Proliferation in the subhilar region of the dentate gyrus has been shown to be affected by genetic differences (Kempermann et al., 1997; Hayes and Nowakowski, 2002), species differences (Kornack and Rakic, 1999), various treatments such as drugs (Eisch et al., 2000), stress (Tanapat et al., 1998; Gould and Tanapat, 1999), behavioral experiences (Kempermann et al., 1998a), hormones (Cameron et al., 1998; Tanapat et al., 1999), aging (Kempermann et al., 1998b), and exercise (van Praag et al., 1999). Although proliferation in the dentate gyrus persists through- out the life span of the animal, there is a significant decline with age (Kuhn et al., 1996; Kempermann et al., 1998b); in mice at 18 months of age the reported number of BUdR labeled cells observed after 12 daily injections is only about 25% of the number observed after a similar labeling paradigm at 6 months of age (Kempermann et al., 1998b). This decline could be due to a decrease in the number of proliferating cells, an increase in the amount of cell death (in either the proliferating population or the output population) during the 12-day period during which the BUdR injections were given, or both. (However, as yet untested is the possibility that the difference could be a result of changes in T c and/or T s with age, for example, by a lengthening of G1 or a short- ening of S.) What is significant, however, is that the proliferation continues even in aged animals and that even though there is a large decline over a one-year period, the decline is relatively small when considered with respect to the length of a single cell cycle, which is about 12–14 hr in mice (Hayes and Nowakowski, 2002) and about 24 hr in rats (Cameron and McKay, 2001). Using the longer cell cycle, that is, ϳ24 hr, the changes due to age would indicate that the size of the proliferating population declines at a rate of Ͻ0.15% per cell cycle. (Note that the converse also would hold; that is, if the proliferating population is in fact a constant size, then an increase in the length of the cell cycle of ϳ0.15% per cell cycle could account for the age changes.) THE RHOMBIC LIP AND THE EXTERNAL GRANULE CELL LAYER OF THE CEREBELLUM The external granule cell layer of the cerebellum is unique among the proliferating populations of the CNS in that it is adjacent to the pial surface rather than the ventricular surface (Fig. 17). The external granule cell layer was first recognized as the source of the granule cells of the cerebellum near the end of the 19th century (Obersteiner, 1883; Schaper, 1897a, b; Ramon y Cajal, 1909–1911). The cells of the external granule cell layer originate from the rhombic lip and then migrate over the surface of the cerebellum. The rhombic lip also gives rise to neurons of the brain stem, chiefly of the inferior olivary nuclei but also of the cochlear and pontine nuclei (Harkmark, 1954; Taber-Pierce, 1973). In the human the cells migrating from the rhombic lip to the brain stem form a continuous band which was called the cor- pus pontobulbare by Essick (1907, 1909, 1912). The external granule cell layer is present in every verte- brate that has been examined. It is a single layer of cells that is about 6–8 cell diameters thick. Importantly, mitotic figures are scattered throughout the external part of the layer indicating that there is no interkinetic nuclear migration. In this regard, the external granule cell layer is similar to the SVZ. The internal part of the external granule cell layer is not a proliferative zone, but instead it consists of cells that are “waiting” to migrate. The major output of the external granule cell layer is the many cells that comprise the internal granule cell, which are arguably the most numerous neurons in the brain. The life span of the external granule cell is long in comparison with the VZ that produces the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. For example, in the mouse, the Purkinje cells are produced in a three-day period from E10 through E13 but the internal granule cells are produced over a much more extended period from late in the postnatal period through the third week after birth (Miale and Sidman, 1961). The relatively long period of neuron production in the external granule cell layer is similar in other species including humans (Zecevic and Rakic, 1976). FIGURE 17. The external granule cell layer (EGL) lies beneath the pial surface of the developing cerebellum. These stem/progenitor cells divide in the EGL and migrate through the molecular layer (Mol), past the Purkinje cells into the internal granule cell layer (IG). Drawing from Jacobson (1991), modified from Ramon y Cajal (1909–1911). 36 Chapter 2 • R. S. Nowakowski and N. L. Hayes It is interesting to note that the two major cell classes of the cerebellum, the Purkinje cells and granule cells, are produced in two distinct proliferative zones, the VZ of the fourth ventricle and the external granule cell layer, respectively, at quite different times during development. Thus, it is clear that the final product, that is, the normal cerebellar cortex with a proper number of both types of cells, requires an elaborate regulatory system that would need to include some sort of feedback system through which the early developing cell (the Purkinje cell) could influence the production of the later developing cell (the granule cell). This interaction is hinted at by the changes in the thickness of the external granule cell layer in the reeler mutant mouse where it achieves normal thickness only in places where the Purkinje cell dendrites are normally oriented toward the pial surface (Caviness and Rakic, 1978). Recent evidence indicates that this interaction is mediated by sonic hedgehog which is released from the Purkinje cells and which then binds to the Patched1 receptor on the proliferating cells of the external granule cell layer (Corcoran and Scott, 2001). Mutations in the Patched1 receptor may be involved in the development of medulloblastoma, one of the most common brain tumors of childhood (Corcoran and Scott, 2001; Pomeroy et al., 2002). OVERVIEW The four major proliferative populations of the developing brain each have a specific role during the development of the brain. They have two important tasks which are to (1) produce the right number of cells for the particular brain region—either too many or too few will result in abnormalities—and (2) to pro- duce the right class of cells (neurons vs glia, and subtypes of each). The delineation of the regulation of these two tasks is a major goal of developmental neuroscience. Progress toward some aspects of this are detailed in other chapters of this book. REFERENCES Adams, R.J., 1996, Metaphase spindles rotate in the neuroepithelium of rat cerebral cortex, J. Neurosci. 16:7610–7618. Alexiades, M.R. and Cepko, C., 1996, Quantitative analysis of proliferation and cell cycle length during development of the rat retina, Dev. Dyn. 205:293–307. Altman, J. and Bayer, S.A., 1990, Vertical compartmentation and cellular transformations in the germinal matrices of the embryonic rat cere- bral cortex, J. Exp. Neurol. 107:23–35. Alvarez-Buylla, A. and Garcia-Verdugo J.M., 2002, Neurogenesis in adult subventricular zone, J. Neurosci. 22: 629–634. Anderson, S.A., Kaznowski, C.E., Horn, C., Rubenstein, J.L., and McConnell, S.K., 2002, Distinct origins of neocortical projection neurons and interneurons in vivo, Cereb. Cortex 12:702–709. Angevine, J.B., Jr., 1965, Time of neuron origin in the hippocampal region: An autoradiographic study in the mouse, Exp. Neurol. Suppl. 2:1–71. Angevine, J.B.J., 1964, Autoradiographic study of histogenesis in the area dentata of the cerebral cortex in the mouse, Anat. Rec. 148:255–. Angevine, J.B.J. and Sidman, R.L., 1961, Autoradiographic study of cell migration during histogenesis of cerebral cortex in the mouse, Nature 192:766–768. Bayer, S.A., 1982, Changes in the total number of dentate granule cells in juvenile and adult rats: A correlated volumetric and 3H-thymidine autoradiographic study, Exp. Brain. Res. 46:315–323. Bayer, S.A. and Altman, J., 1975, Radiation-induced interference with post- natal hippocampal cytogenesis in rats and its long-term effects on the acquisition of neurons and glia, J. Comp. Neurol. 163:1–20. Bayer S.A., Yackel J.W., and Puri P.S., 1982, Neurons in the rat dentate gyrus granular layer substantially increase during juvenile and adult life. Science 216:890-892. Bhide, P.G., 1996, Cell cycle kinetics in the embryonic mouse corpus striatum, J. Comp. Neurol. 374:506–522. Blau, H.M., Brazelton, T.R., and Weimann, J.M., 2001, The evolving concept of a stem cell: Entity or function? Cell 105:829–841. Blaschke, A.J., Staley, K., and Chun, J., 1996, Widespread programmed cell death in proliferative and postmitotic regions of the fetal cerebral cortex, Development 122:1165–1174. Boulder Committee, 1970, Embryonic vertebrate central nervous system: Revised terminology, Anat. Rec. 166:257–262. Brazel, C.Y., Romanko, M.J., Rothstein, R.P., and Levison, S.W., 2003, Roles of the mammalian subventricular zone in brain development, Prog. Neurobiol. 69:49–69. Cai, L., Hayes, N.L., and Nowakowski, R.S., 1997a, Synchrony of clonal cell proliferation and contiguity of clonally related cells: Production of mosaicism in the ventricular zone of developing mouse neocortex, J. Neurosci. 17:2088–2100. Cai, L., Hayes, N.L., and Nowakowski, R.S., 1997b, Local homogeneity of cell cycle length in developing mouse cortex, J. Neurosci. 17:2079–2087. Cameron, H.A. and McKay, R.D., 2001, Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus, J. Comp. Neurol. 435:406–417. Cameron, H.A., Tanapat, P., and Gould, E. 1998, Adrenal steroids and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation regulate neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult rats through a common pathway, Neuroscience 82:349–354. Caviness, V., Takahashi, T., and Nowakowski, R., 1995, Numbers, time and neocortical neuronogenesis: A general developmental and evolution- ary model, Trends Neurosci. 18:379–383. Caviness, V.S. and Rakic, P., 1978, Mechanisms of cortical development: A view from mutations in mice, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1:297–326. Caviness, V.S. and Sidman, R.L., 1973, Time of origin of corresponding cell classes in the cerebral cortex of normal and reeler mutant mice: An autoradiographic analysis, J. Comp. Neurol. 148:141–152. Chenn, A. and McConnell, S., 1995, Cleavage orientation and the asymmet- ric inheritance of Notch1 immunoreactivity in mammalian neurogen- esis, Cell 82:631–641. Chenn, A., Zhang, Y.A., Chang, B.T., and McConnell, S.K., 1998, Intrinsic polarity of mammalian neuroepithelial cells, Mol. Cell Neurosci. 11:183–193. Corbin, J.G., Nery, S., and Fishell, G., 2001, Telencephalic cells take a tangent: Non-radial migration in the mammalian forebrain, Nat. Neurosci. 4 Suppl:1177–1182. Corcoran, R.B. and Scott, M.P., 2001, A mouse model for medulloblastoma and basal cell nevus syndrome, J. Neurooncol. 53:307–318. Crandall, J.E. and Caviness, V.S.,1984, Axon strata of the cerebral wall in embryonic mice, Dev. Brain. Res. 14:185–195. Crespo, D., Stanfield, B.B., and Cowan, W.M., 1986, Evidence that late- generated ganule cells do not simply replace earlier formed neurons in the rat dentate gyrus, Exp. Brain. Res. 62:541–548. Cell Proliferation in the Developing Mammalian Brain • Chapter 2 37 Dehay, C., Giroud, P., Berland, M., Smart, I., and Kennedy, H., 1993, Modulation of the cell cycle contributes to the parcellation of the primate visual cortex, Nature 366:464–466. Eisch, A.J., Barrot, M., Schad, C.A., Self, D.W., and Nestler, E.J., 2000, Opiates inhibit neurogenesis in the adult rat hippocampus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7579–7584. Eriksson, P.S., Perfilieva, E., Bjork-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A.M., Nordborg, C., Peterson, D.A. et al., 1998, Neurogenesis in the adult human hip- pocampus [see comments], Nat. Med. 4:1313–1317. Essick, C.R., 1907, The corpus ponto-bulbare—A hitherto undescribed nuclear mass in the human hindbrain, Am. J. Anat. 7:119–135. Essick, C.R., 1909, On the embryology of the corpus ponto-bulbare and its relationship to the development of the pons, Anat. Rec. 3:254–257. Essick, C.R., 1912, The development of the nuclei pontis and the nucleus arcuatus in man, Am. J. Anat. 13:25–54. Finlay, B.L. and Pallas, S.L., 1989, Control of cell number in the developing mammalian visual system, Prog. Neurobiol. 32:207–234. Finlay, B.L. and Slattery, M., 1983, Local differences in the amount of early cell death in neocortex predict adult local specializations, Science 219:1349–1351. Fishell, G., Mason, C.A., and Hatten, M.E.,1993, Dispersion of neural prog- enitors within the germinal zones of the forebrain [published erratum appears in Nature 1993 May 20; 363(6426):286] [see comments], Nature 362:636–638. Garcia-Verdugo, J.M., Doetsch, F., Wichterle, H., Lim, D.A., and Alvarez- Buylla, A.,1998, Architecture and cell types of the adult subventricu- lar zone: In search of the stem cells, J. Neurobiol. 36:234–248. Gilmore, E.C., Nowakowski, R.S., Caviness, V.S., Jr., and Herrup, K., 2000, Cell birth, cell death, cell diversity and DNA breaks: How do they all fit together? Trends. Neurosci. 23:100–105. Goldman, J.E., 1995, Lineage, migration, and fate determination of postnatal subventricular zone cells in the mammalian CNS, J. Neurooncol. 24:61–64. Gould, E. and Tanapat, P., 1999, Stress and hippocampal neurogenesis, Biol. Psychiatry 46:1472–1479. Halliday, A.L. and Cepko, C.L.,1992, Generation and migration of cells in the developing striatum, Neuron 9:15–26. Hamilton, E. and Dobbin, J., 1983a, The percentage labeled mitosis technique shows the mean cell cycle time to be half its true value in Carcinoma TY. 1. [H3]thymidine and vincristine studies, Cell Tissue Kinet. 16: 473–482. Hamilton, E. and Dobbin, J., 1983b, The percentage labeled mitoses technique shows the mean cell cycle time to be half its true value in Carcinoma NT. II. [3H]deoxyuridine studies, Cell Tissue Kinet. 16:483–492. Harkmark, W., 1954, Cell migrations from the rhombic lip to the infe- rior olive, the nucleus raphe and the pons. A morphological and experimental investigation on chick embryos, J. Comp. Neurol. 100:115–209. Hayes, N.L. and Nowakowski, R.S., 2000, Exploiting the dynamics of S-phase tracers in developing brain: Interkinetic nuclear migration for cells entering versus leaving the S-phase, Dev. Neurosci. 22:44–55. Hayes, N.L. and Nowakowski, R.S., 2002, Dynamics of cell proliferation in the adult dentate gyrus of two inbred strains of mice, Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 134:77–85. Heumann, D. and Leuba, G., 1983, Neuronal death in the development and aging of the cerebral cortex of the mouse, Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 9:297–311. Hinds, J.W., 1968a, Autoradiographic study of histogenesis in the mouse olfactory bulb. I. Time of origin of neurons and neuroglia, J. Comp. Neurol. 134:287–304. Hinds, J.W., 1968b, Autoradiographic study of histogenesis in the mouse olfactory bulb. II. Cell proliferation and migration. J. Comp. Neurol. 134:305–322. His, W., 1889, Die Neuroblasten und deren Entstehung im embryonalen Mark, Abh Kgl Sachs Ges Wiss Math-phys Cl 15:313–372. His, W., 1897, Address upon the development of the brain, Trans. Roy. Acad. Med. Ireland 15:1–21. His, W., 1904, Die Entwicklung des Menschlichen Gehirns wahrend der ersten Monate, von S. Hirzel, Leipzig. Hoshino, K., Matsuzawa, T., and Murakami, U., 1973, Characteristic of the cell cycle of matrix cells in the mouse embryo during histogenesis of telencephalon, Exp. Cell Res. 77:89–94. Jacobson, M., 1991, Developmental Neurobiology, 3rd edn, Plenum Press: New York & London. Kaplan, M.S. and Hinds, J.W., 1977, Neurogenesis in the adult rat: Electron microscopic analysis of light radioautographs, Science 197:1092–1094. Kaufmann, S.L., 1968, Lengthening of the generation cycle during embry- onic differentiation of the mouse neural tube, Exp. Cell Res. 49:420–424. Kempermann, G., Brandon, E.P., and Gage, F.H., 1998a, Environmen- tal stimulation of 129/SvJ mice causes increased cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus, Curr. Biol. 8: 939–942. Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H.G., and Gage, F.H., 1997, Genetic influence on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10409–10414. Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H.G., and Gage, F.H., 1998b, Experience- induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus, J. Neurosci. 18:3206–3212. Kennedy, H. and Dehay, C., 1993, The importance of developmental timing in cortical specification, Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 1:93–99. Koelliker, R.A., 1896, Handbuc der Gewebelchre des Menschen. Bd. 2 Nervensystem des Menschen und der Thiere, 6th edn, W. Englemann, Leipzig. Kornack, D.R. and Rakic, P., 1998, Changes in cell-cycle kinetics during the development and evolution of primate neocortex, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1242–1246. Kornack, D.R. and Rakic, P., 1999, Continuation of neurogenesis in the hip- pocampus of the adult macaque monkey, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5768–5773. Kuhn, H.G., and Dickinson-Anson, H., and Gage, F.H., 1996, Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: Age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation, J. Neurosci. 16:2027–2033. Lavdas, A.A., Grigoriou, M., Pachnis, V., and Parnavelas, J.G., 1999, The medial ganglionic eminence gives rise to a population of early neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 19:7881-7888. Lavdas, A.A., Mione, M.C., and Parnavelas, J.G., 1996, Neuronal clones in the cerebral cortex show morphological neurotransmitter hetero- geneity during development, Cerebral Cortex 6:490–497. Letinic, K. and Rakic, P., 2001, Telencephalic origin of human thalamic GABAergic neurons, Nat. Neurosci. 4:931–936. Letinic, K., Zoncu, R., and Rakic, P., 2002, Origin of GABAergic neurons in the human neocortex, Nature 417:645–649. Leuba, G., Heumann, D., and Rabinowicz, T., 1977, Postnatal development of the mouse cerebral neocortex. I. Quantitative cytoarchitectonics of some motor and sensory areas, J. Hirnforsch. 18:461–481. LeVine, S.M. and Goldman, J.E., 1988a, Embryonic divergence of oligo- dendrocyte and astrocyte lineages in developing rat cerebrum, J. Neurosci. 8:3992–4006. LeVine, S.M. and Goldman, J.E., 1988b, Spatial and temporal patterns of oligodendrocyte differentiation in rat cerebrum and cerebellum, J. Comp. Neurol. 277:441–455. Levinson, S.W. and Goldman, J.E., 1993, Both oligodendrocytes and astro- cytes develop from progenitors in the subventricular zone of the postnatal rat forebrain, Neuron 10:201–212. Lois, C. and Alvarez-Buylla, A., 1994, Long-distance neuronal migration in the adult mammalian brain, Science 264:1145–1148. 38 Chapter 2 • R. S. Nowakowski and N. L. Hayes Luskin, M.B., 1993, Restricted proliferation and migration of postnatally generated neurons derived from the forebrain subventricular zone, Neuron 11:173–189. Luskin, M.B. and McDermott, K., 1994, Divergent lineages for oligodendro- cytes and astrocytes originating in the neonatal forebrain subventric- ular zone, Glia 11:211–226. Luskin, M.B., Parnavelas, J.G., and Barfield, J.A., 1993, Neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes of the rat cerebral cortex originate from sepa- rate progenitor cells: An ultrastructural analysis of clonally related cells, J. Neurosci. 13:1730–1750. Luskin, M.B., Pearlman, A.L., and Sanes, J.R., 1988, Cell lineage in the cere- bral cortex of the mouse studied in vivo and in vitro with a recombi- nant retrovirus, Neuron 1:635–647. Mares, V. and Bruckner, G., 1978, Postnatal formation of neural cells in the rat occipital cerebrum: An autoradiographic study of the time and space pattern of cell division, J. Comp. Neurol. 177:519–528. Marin, O. and Rubenstein, J.L., 2001, A long, remarkable journey: Tangential migration in the telencephalon, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2:780–790. Miale, I. and Sidman, R.L., 1961, An autoradiographic analysis of histogen- esis in the mouse cerebellum, Exp. Neurol. 4:277–296. Mione, M.C., Cavanagh, J.F., Harris, B., and Parnavelas, J.G., 1997, Cell fate specification and symmetrical/asymmetrical divisions in the develop- ing cerebral cortex, J. Neurosci. 17:2018–2029. Mione, M.C., Danevic, C., Boardman, P., Harris, B., and Parnavelas, J.G., 1994, Lineage analysis reveals neurotransmitter, (GABA) or gluta- mate, but not calcium-binding protein homogeneity in clonally related cortical neurons, J. Neurosci. 14:107–123. Miyama, S., Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1997, A gradient in the duration of the G1 phase in the murine neocortical proliferative epithelium, Cereb. Cortex 7:678–689. Nery, S., Fishell, G., and Corbin, J.G., 2002, The caudal ganglionic eminence is a source of distinct cortical and subcortical cell populations, Nat. Neurosci. 5:1279–1287. Nowakowski, R.S. and Rakic, P., 1981, The site of origin and route and rate of migration of neurons to the hippocampal region of the rhesus monkey, J. Comp. Neurol. 196:129–154. Nowakowski, R.S., Caviness, V.S., Jr., Takahashi, T., and Hayes, N.L., 2002, Population dynamics during cell proliferation and neuronogenesis in the developing murine neocortex. In Cortical Development: From Specification to Differentiation (Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation. Vol. 39) (C. Hohmann, ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–22. Nowakowski, R.S., Lewin, S.B., and Miller, M.W., 1989, Bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemical determination of the lengths of the cell cycle and the DNA-synthetic phase for an anatomically defined population, J. Neurocytol. 18:311–318. O’Rourke, N.A., Dailey, M.E., Smith, S.J., and McConnell, S.K., 1992, Diverse migratory pathways in the developing cerebral cortex, Science 258:299–302. Obersteiner, H., 1883, Der feinere Bau der Kleinhirnrinde beim Menschen und bie Tieren, Biol. Zentralbl. 3:145–155. Panganiban, G. and Rubenstein, J.L., 2002, Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes, Development 129:4371–4386. Pomeroy, S.L., Tamayo, P., Gaasenbeek, M., Sturla, L.M., Angelo, M., McLaughlin, M.E. et al., 2002, Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression, Nature 415:436–442. Powell, E.M., Campbell, D.B., Stanwood, G.D., Davis, C., Noebels, J.L., and Levitt, P., 2003, Genetic disruption of cortical interneuron develop- ment causes region- and GABA cell type-specific deficits, epilepsy, and behavioral dysfunction, J. Neurosci. 23:622–631. Price, J., 1987, Retroviruses and the study of cell lineage, Development 101:409–419. Privat, A., 1975, Postnatal gliogenesis in the mammalian brain, Int. Rev. Cytol. 40:281–323. Rachel, R.A., Dolen, G., Hayes, N.L., Lu, A., Erskine, L., Nowakowski, R.S., and Mason, C.A., 2002, Spatiotemporal features of early neurono- genesis differ in wild-type and albino mouse retina, J. Neurosci. 22:4249–4263. Rakic, P., 1974, Neurons in rhesus monkey visual cortex: Systematic relation between time of origin and eventual disposition. Science 183:425–427. Rakic, P., 1977, Genesis of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the rhesus monkey: Site and time of origin, kinetics of proliferation, routes of migration and pattern of distribution of neurons, J. Comp. Neurol. 176:23–52. Rakic, P., and Nowakowski, R.S.,1981, The time of origin of neurons in the hippocampal region of the rhesus monkey, J. Comp. Neurol. 196: 99–128. Rakic, P. and Sidman, R.L., 1968, Supravital DNA synthesis in the deve- loping human and mouse brain, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 27:246–276. Rakic, P. and Sidman, R.L., 1969, Telencephalic origin of pulvinar neurons in the fetal human brain, Z Anat. Entwickl-Gesch. 129:53–82. Rakic, P., Stensaas, L.J., Sayer, E.P., and Sidman, R.L., 1974, Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative analysis of cells from serial electron microscopic montage of foetal monkey brain, Nature 250:31–34. Ramon y Cajal, S., 1894, Les nouvelle idees sur la structure du systeme nerveuz chez l’homme et chez les vertebras, Reinwald, Paris. Ramon y Cajal, S., 1909–1911, Histologie du Systeme Nerveaux de l’Homme et des Vertebres, Reprinted by Instituto Ramon y Cajal del CSIC, Madrid. Reynolds, B.A. and Weiss, S., 1992, Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system, Science 255:1707–1710. Sauer, F.C., 1935, Mitosis in the neural tube, J. Comp. Neurol. 62:377–405. Sauer, F.C., 1936, The interkinetic migration of embryonic epithelial nuclei, J. Morphol. 60:1–11. Sauer, F.C., 1937, Some factors in the morphogenesis of vertebrate embry- onic epithelia, J. Morphol. 61:563–579. Sauer, M.E., 1959, Radioautographic study of the location of newly synthe- sized deoxyribonucleic acid in the neural tube of the chick embryo: Evidence for intermitotic migration of nuclei. Anat. Rec. 133:456. Sauer, M.E. and Chittenden, A.C., 1959, Deoxyribonucleic acid content of cell nuclei in the neural tube of the chick embryo: Evidence for inter- mitotic migration of nuclei, Exp. Cell. Res. 16:1–6. Schaper, A., 1897a, Die fruhesten Differenzierungsvorgange im Central- nervensystem, Arch Entwicklungsmech Organ 5:81–132. Schaper, A., 1897b, The earliest differentiation in the central nervous system of vertebrates, Science 5:81–132. Schaper, A. and Cohen, C., 1905, Beitraege zur Analyze des tierischen Wachstums. II. Teil: Ueber zellproliferatorische Wachstumszentren und deren Bezeihung zur Regeneration und Geschwulstbildung, Arch. f Entwick-Mech. 19:348–445. Schmechel, D.E. and Rakic, P., 1979a, Arrested proliferation of radial glial cells during midgestation in rhesus monkey, Nature 277:303–305. Schmechel, D.E. and Rakic, P., 1979b, A Golgi study of radial glial cells in developing monkey telencephalon: Morphogenesis and transforma- tion into astrocytes, Anat. Embryol. (Berl) 156:115–152. Seaberg, R.M. and van der Kooy, D., 2003, Stem and progenitor sells: The premature desertion of rigorous definitions, Trends Neurosci. 26:125–131. Sidman, R.L., 1970, Autoradiographic methods and principles for study of the nervous system with thymidine-H3. In Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy (W.J.H. Nauta and S.O.E. Ebbesson, eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 252–274. Cell Proliferation in the Developing Mammalian Brain • Chapter 2 39 Sidman, R.L., Miale, I.L., and Feder, N., 1959, Cell proliferation and migra- tion in the primitive ependymal zone: An autoradiographic study of histogenesis in the nervous system, Exp. Neurol. 1:322–333. Smart, I., 1961, The subependymal layer of the mouse brain and its cell pro- duction as shown by autoradiography after thymidine-H3 injection, J. Comp. Neurol. 116:325–347. Smart, I. and Leblond, C.P., 1961, Evidence for division and transformation of neuroglia cells in the mouse brain, as derived from radio-autography after injection of thymidine-H3, J. Comp. Neurol. 116:349–367. Smart, I.H.M., 1972, Proliferative characteristics of the ependymal layer during the early development of the mouse diencephalon, as revealed by recording the number, location, and plane of cleavage of mitotic cells, J. Anat. 113:109–129. Smart, I.H.M., 1973, Proliferative characteristics of the ependymal layer during the early development of the mouse neocortex: A pilot study based on recording the number, location and plane of cleavage of mitotic figures, J. Anat. 116:67–91. Smart, I.H.M. and McSherry, G.M., 1982, Growth patterns in the lateral wall of the mouse telencephalon: II. Histological changes during and sub- sequent to the period of isocortical neuron production, J. Anat. 134:415–442. Stanfield, B.B. and Cowan, W.M., 1979, The development of the hippocam- pus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice, J. Comp. Neurol. 185: 423–459. Stanfield, B.B. and Trice, J.E., 1988, Evidence that granule cells generated in the dentate gyrus of adult rats extend axonal projections, Exp. Brain. Res. 72:399–406. Sturrock, R.R. and Smart, I.H., 1980, A morphological study of the mouse subependymal layer from embryonic life to old age, J. Anat. 130: 391–415. Taber-Pierce, E., 1973, Time of origin of neurons in the brain stem of the mouse, Prog. Brain Res. 40:53–66. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1993, Cell cycle parameters and patterns of nuclear movement in the neocortical proliferative zone of the fetal mouse, J. Neurosci. 13:820–833. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1995a, The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall, J. Neurosci. 15:6046–6057. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1995b, Early ontogeny of the secondary proliferative population of the embryonic murine cerebral wall, J. Neurosci. 15:6058–6068. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1996a, The leaving or Q fraction of the murine cerebral proliferative epithelium: A gen- eral model of neocortical neuronogenesis, J. Neurosci. 16:6183–6196. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1996b, Interkinetic and migratory behavior of a cohort of neocortical neurons arising in the early embryonic murine cerebral wall, J. Neurosci. 16:5762–5776. Takahashi T., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, V.S., Jr., 1997, The mathe- matics of neocortical neuronogenesis, Dev. Neurosci. 19:17–22. Tan, S.S. and Breen, S., 1993, Radial mosaicism and tangential cell disper- sion both contribute to mouse neocortical development [see com- ments], Nature 362:638–640. Tanapat, P., Galea, L.A., and Gould, E., 1998, Stress inhibits the proliferation of granule cell precursors in the developing dentate gyrus, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 16:235–239. Tanapat, P., Hastings, N.B., Reeves, A.J., and Gould, E., 1999, Estrogen stimulates a transient increase in the number of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of the adult female rat, J. Neurosci. 19:5792–5801. Thomaidou, D., Mione, M.C., Cavanagh, J.F., and Parnavelas, J.G., 1997, Apoptosis and its relation to the cell cycle in the developing cerebral cortex, J. Neurosci. 17:1075–1085. Van Praag, H., Christie, B.R., Sejnowski, T.J., and Gage, F.H., 1999, Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13427–13431. Van Praag, H., Schinder, A.F., Christie, B.R., Toni, N., Palmer, T.D., and Gage, F.H., 2002, Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus, Nature 415:1030–1034. Verney, C., Takahashi, T., Bhide, P.G., Nowakowski, R.S., and Caviness, Jr., V.S., 2000, Independent controls for neocortical neuron production and histogenetic cell death, Dev. Neurosci. 22:125–138. Vignal, W., 1888, Recherches sur le developpement des elements des couches corticales du cerveau et du cervelet chez l’homme et les mamiferes, Arch. Physiol. Norm. Path. (Paris) Ser. IV 2:228–254. Walsh, C., 1993, Cell lineage and regional specification in the mammalian neocortex, Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 1:75–80. Walsh, C. and Cepko, C.L., 1988, Clonally related cortical cells show several migration patterns, Science 242:1342–1345. Walsh, C. and Cepko, C.L., 1992, Widespread dispersion of neuronal clones across functional regions of the cerebral cortex, Science 255:434–440. Wichterle, H., and Turnbull, D.H., Nery, S., Fishell, G., and Alvarez-Buylla, A., 2001, In utero fate mapping reveals distinct migratory pathways and fates of neurons born in the mammalian basal forebrain, Development 128:3759–3771. Williams, B.P., Read, J., and Price, J., 1991, The generation of neurons and oligodendrocytes from a common precursor cell, Neuron 7:685–693. Zecevic, N. and Rakic, P., 1976, Differentiation of Purkinje cells and their relationship to other components of developing cerebellar cortex in man, J. Comp. Neurol. 167:27–47. PRINCIPLES AND MECHANISMS OF PATTERNING If development is the process of reproducibly taking undifferen- tiated tissue and making it more complex in an organized way, then pattern formation is the mechanism for producing the orga- nization in that complexity. This requires initiating differential gene expression within two or more apparently homogeneous cells. In some organisms this is initially done by segregating cytoplasmic determinants into specific daughter cells. These cytoplasmic determinants (proteins or RNAs) can result in the transcription of a restricted set of genes and begin the cascade that sets up tissues as different from one another in a coordinated pattern (Fig. 1). This is a totally cell autonomous mechanism and theoretically it could be the only mechanism for patterning the embryo. However, whereas this mechanism is well supported by evidence in the initiation of pattern formation in many inverte- brates (e.g., Drosophila) and is probably invoked in vertebrates when asymmetrical cell division is the rule (e.g., stem cells), it does not appear to be the main method for embryonic pattern formation in vertebrates. Vertebrate pattern formation, including the patterning of the nervous system, involves cellular responses to environmental asymmetries. Whereas embryonic cells initially may be a homo- geneous population, they are not homogeneous in their relation- ship to asymmetrical environmental signals; by definition some are closer and some are further away. Thus, some receive a higher level of the signal and some a lower level or none at all. This difference gets translated into differential cellular response, which results in pattern formation within the field (Fig. 2). Understanding pattern formation in the vertebrate nervous system means understanding this cascade of cellular and molecu- lar interactions. The term cascade is often used to describe the events in development and pattern formation because one or more simple asymmetries initiate a pattern, which then becomes the foundation for the formation of a more complex pattern, which in turn forms the foundation for even finer patterning. The players in such a cascade are the cells and molecules of the early embryo. They include the source of the environmental asymmetry, which secretes the signal, which binds to the receptors, which initiate the signal transduction pathway within the responding cells, which activates the transcription factors, which regulate the set of coor- dinated downstream genes whose expression is modulated (up or down) as a result. These downstream genes may code for new sig- nals, receptors, signal transduction proteins, transcription factors, or extracellular-, membrane bound-, cytoplasmic-, or nuclear- facilitators or -antagonists to modulate the system (Fig. 3), adding the next layer to the cascade. The asymmetrical environmental cues often come from neighboring embryonic tissues whose early differentiation has made them into signaling centers. If these signaling centers can both induce differentiation and pattern in an undifferentiated field, they are called organizers, after the first such center to be identified, the Spemann–Mangold Organizer in amphibians, which was observed to induce and pattern the neuraxis (Spemann and Mangold, 1924). The signaling molecules may be peptide growth factors, vitamin metabolites, or other soluble, trans- ported, or tethered ligands. When they have different effects across a homogeneous field of responding cells depending on their concentration, these signaling molecules are called morphogens. Because they invest the cells within the field with information about their relative position, they are also called positional signals. Models involving differences in binding affinity have been offered to demonstrate how one signal could have differing affects at different concentrations (Fig. 4). Regardless of mechanism, these signals activate or induce the expression of a specific set of transcription factors that are unique to responsive cells at a particular distance from the source, and thus at a particular location in the embryo. These transcription factors are called positional identity genes, and they are often used as markers to define a region. Before the molecular revolution, they were called positional information. These transcription factors regulate the expression of selected genes, which may code for a component in this or another patterning pathway, or for proteins involved in differentiation of these cells. In the nervous system, this could include proteins mediating neuronal migration, axon outgrowth and navigation, precise connections, specific neurotransmitter production, or receptors that characterize the neurons of this locale. In the event that these downstream genes are unique to this region, they 3 Anteroposterior and Dorsoventral Patterning Diana Karol Darnell Diana Karol Darnell • Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, IL 60045. Developmental Neurobiology, 4th ed., edited by Mahendra S. Rao and Marcus Jacobson. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, 2005. 41 42 Chapter 3 • Diana K. Darnell Patterned epithelium with 4 different cell types A B FIGURE 1. A patterned layer of cells can be achieved by localizing cytoplasmic determinants (shown here as various textures) within the parent cell. (A) Cell division segregates these determinants into different daughter cells, and they instruct their descendants (B) to acquire different phenotypes or fates. Cytoplasmic determinants are often RNAs for- or transcription factors themselves. ∆ time Responding field of homogenous cells Patterned epithelium with 4 different cell types Source & Signal A B C D FIGURE 2. Asymmetric signaling (arrows) can change the fates of homogenous cells (white blocks) within the signal’s reach. Cell fates can be specified in a stepwise pattern (as shown here, A Ͼ B Ͼ C Ͼ D) or all at once (A Ͼ D), depending on the timing of competence in the responding cells. This figure represents the formation of four different cell types (D) in response to a developing concentration gradient of a signaling molecule. Initially (A), the signal is low even near the source, but continued secretion yields a high concentration near the source and the possibility of inducing different cell types at several thresholds. can also be used as markers when assessing the patterning or differentiation of the tissue. The functions of various genes in these pathways are assessed through three types of experiments. First, candidate genes are identified because their expression shows a correla- tion with the timing and position of an observed patterning event. Second, the ectopic expression of the gene or presence of the pro- tein causes a gain of function, showing that this gene product is sufficient to induce the observed pattern. Finally, failure to express the gene in the normal area results in a loss of function, indicating that the product is necessary. Evidence that a gene product is present, necessary, and sufficient is required to demonstrate a cause and effect relationship between the gene expression and the patterning event. Model Organisms The current understanding of vertebrate neural pattern formation is due to research in a variety of model organisms including frog and other amphibians, chick, mouse, and zebrafish. Research with amphibians and birds has provided us with information on tissue interactions associated with patterning due to their accessibility to microsurgical manipulation, and more recently with specific localized protein function through Anteroposterior and Dorsoventral Patterning • Chapter 3 43 Extracellular Space Cell Membrane Cytoplasm Nucleus Signals Receptors Transducing Proteins Transcription Factors Facilitators Signal Receptor Signal Transduction Pathway Activated Transcription Factors Product Downstream Genes Cell-type Specific Proteins Antagonists FIGURE 3. Pattern formation in vertebrates involves a signaling cascade that produces protein products, which can act in this cell or in the extracellular space to modify some aspect of a future signaling event. In addition, cell-type specific genes can be expressed leading to differentiation. Receptors may be mem- brane bound (as shown) for peptide ligands, or cytoplasmic as with RA and steroid ligands. Antagonists and facilitators can act in the extracellular space, in the membrane in conjunction with the receptor, with the signal transduction proteins or with a transcription factor. A transcription factor and its associated binding proteins can either up- or downregulate transcription of a given downstream gene. Morphogen Source Decreasing Concentration High Medium Low High High Medium DNA binding affinity FIGURE 4. Model of morphogen action. Different concentrations of morphogen activate variable amounts of intracellular transcription factors. Downstream genes with variable affinity for these transcription factors are therefore activated at different concentrations of the morphogen. For example, at high levels of BMP (see Dorsal Patterning), high levels of nuclear SMAD activity would activate epidermal genes with low binding affinity (top cell), at intermediate levels neural crest genes would be activated (medium affinity, middle cell), and at low levels neural genes would be activated (high affinity, bottom cell). (Adapted from Wilson et al., 1997, with permission from the Company of Biologists Ltd.) injection (frog) or transfection (chick) with corresponding genes or mRNA. Mouse has allowed us to eliminate (or add) specific genes, individually or in combination, to understand their impor- tance in specific pathways. Zebrafish has been useful for its ease of mutation, which has helped identify new players and reveal their importance in the signaling pathways. In many cases, the molecular pathways and cellular responses that have been identified appear to be conserved between all vertebrates. In fact, for some molecular pathways, the conservation reaches back to our common ancestors with insects; the same pathways are used in Drosophila. In others, there appear to be differences in pattern regulation that are specific to classes 44 Chapter 3 • Diana K. Darnell of vertebrates. The best described of the general vertebrate cen- tral nervous system (CNS) patterning cascades include the anteroposterior (AP) patterning of the midbrain and hindbrain (reviewed by Lumsden and Krumlauf, 1996), and the dorsoven- tral (DV) patterning of the spinal cord (reviewed by Tanabe and Jessell, 1996; Lee and Jessell, 1999; Litingtung and Chiang, 2000). These will be discussed, and what is known about other regional CNS patterning pathways will be mentioned to highlight our current understanding of neural pattern formation. Axes of the Nervous System The vertebrate nervous system is initially induced as an apparently homogeneous epithelial sheet of ectoderm adjacent to its organizer (see Chapter 1). This neural plate has contact ventrally with the underlying dorsal mesoderm, and laterally with the epidermal ectoderm, and these two neighboring tissues assist the neural plate to form a neural tube in a generally rostral to caudal sequence. Subsequently, a number of broad, discrete regions will form, both anteroposteriorly and dorsoventrally, beginning the cascade of specialization that will ultimately give rise to the complex vertebrate CNS (Fig. 5). Traditionally we identify the prominent AP regions as forebrain, midbrain, hind- brain, and spinal cord, whereas in the DV plane (at least in the trunk) we recognize the dorsal sensory neurons and ventral motor neurons. In addition, from the lateral margins of the early neu- roectoderm, the sensory placodes and neural crest form and generate the cranial nerves and the peripheral nervous system (PNS; Fig. 5, see also Chapter 4). At later stages, left vs right also becomes an important feature of the differentiated nervous system; however, virtually nothing is known at this time about the control of this patterning. The cellular and molecular mecha- nisms associated with the AP and DV cascades of patterning that give rise to distinctive regional development in the early vertebrate neuroectoderm is the focus of this chapter. AP PATTERN Early Decisions At its inception, the neural plate has three axes, AP, medi- olateral, and left–right. As it forms the neural tube, the AP axis comes to extend virtually the entire length of the dorsal embryo. Patterning in the AP plane proceeds from coarse to fine subdivi- sions and involves morphogens, receptors, internal and external regulators, signal transducers, transcription factors, and tissue specific target genes. The embryo matures in a head to tail direction, so more anterior structures are further along in their developmental cascade than are caudal structures. Thus, it is often not entirely meaningful to state the subdivisions as though they have formed concurrently. The AP cascade is much more complex than that. However, for simplicity’s sake we say that the early neural plate begins its life in an anterior state (defined here as “head”), and the first step in patterning is to establish from this a separate “trunk” region. Soon thereafter, beginning at the anterior end of the embryo, the neural plate forms a neural tube, which swells, extends, and further subdivides to form the prosencephalon or forebrain, the mesencephalon or midbrain, the rhombencephalon or hindbrain, and the narrow spinal cord (Fig. 6). Conventional embryology and anatomy include the fore- brain, midbrain, and hindbrain with the head, and begin the trunk at the anterior spinal cord (either just caudal to the last rhomben- cephalic swelling at r7 and the first somite, or at the level of the fifth somite and first cervical vertebrae). However, evolutionar- ily, it appears that the hindbrain level of the AP axis may have come first in prevertebrate chordates, with structures anterior (new head) and posterior (trunk and tail) being added as verte- brates evolved. Within the realm of neural pattern formation, this “new head” including the forebrain and midbrain express Otx2 and other non-Hox transcription factors as positional information, and are dependent for their formation on several signaling factors called “head inducers” (see below), making this region of the head distinctly different from the hindbrain. In con- trast, the spinal cord is clearly patterned as an extension of the hindbrain using Hox genes as positional information, and is dependent for its formation on several caudalizing factors, which are antagonistic to those involved in “new head” formation. Thus, for the purposes of discussing pattern formation, “head” will be defined as the neuroectoderm rostral to the midbrain/hindbrain boundary (site of the isthmic organizer), and “trunk” as the area caudal to it (including the future hindbrain and spinal cord). This “head–trunk” division represents a didactic effort to segregate major patterning differences. Within the head and trunk further subdivisions are estab- lished in response to asymmetric signals through the expression of positional information genes (region specific transcription factors), and these regions in turn are also subdivided until the finely patterned detail of the fetal CNS is achieved. Details of our understanding of the pathways leading to these major and minor subdivisions appear below. First Division The longstanding models for AP patterning are founded on landmark experiments from the early part of the last century (Spemann and H. Mangold, 1924; Spemann, 1931; O. Mangold, 1933) and reconsidered in the 1950s by Nieuwkoop (Nieuwkoop et al., 1952) and Saxen and Toivonen (reviewed by Saxen, 1989). Working with amphibian embryos, Spemann and H. Mangold discovered that the upper (dorsal) blastopore lip could induce a well-patterned ectopic neural axis. They called this region the organizer. Subsequently, Spemann (1931) determined that the organizer of younger embryos could induce a whole axis includ- ing head while older organizers could only induce the trunk neuraxis. Similarly, O. Mangold determined that the underlying mesendoderm having ingressed from the organizer at early stages induced the head, whereas the later mesoderm induced the trunk. Thus the concept of head and trunk as the first coarse AP division of the neuroectoderm was established. [...]... death in r2/4/6 r2 r4 r6 En2 Wnt1 Elk-L3 Elf -2 EbkEbk Follistatin CRABP-1 Sek-1, -3 HoxA2 Sek-4, Krox20 CRABP HoxB2 HoxA1, B1, D1 Sek -2 HoxA6, B6, C6 RAR Fgf-3, Kreisler, Wnt2 HoxA3, B3, D3 RAR HoxA4, B4, C4, D4 HoxC8, D8 HoxB5, B6, B9 HoxC5 HoxC9 HoxA7, B7 HoxD9 HoxD10 HoxD11 HoxD 12 HoxA 12, D13 FIGURE 13 Model of hindbrain segmentation in mouse using wild-type and Krox20 mutants For wild-type embryos,... Wild type Krox20 –/– Activation 8–10 som 1–5 som Activation K20 K20 Hoxa2 K20 Hoxb1 Kr Hoxa2 Recruitment, acquisition of r3/r5 identity K20 K20 K20 Hoxa2 Hoxa2 12 som K20 Hoxb1 Kr Hoxb1 Hoxa2 K20 No maintenance, no sorting at r3 & r5 boundaries Hoxb1 K20 Kr Hoxb1 Hoxa2 Boundary formation r2 Kr No recruitment, acquisition of r2/4/6 identity Maintenance + cell sorting at boundaries 25 som K20 Hoxb1 r3... information, as measured by AP-level specific motor neuron differentiation, tracks with the level of the adjacent paraxial mesoderm At a molecular level, it was anticipated that the mesoderm, which expresses Hox positional-information genes and directly Chick HoxC5 HoxC6 HoxD9 HoxD10 HoxD11 HoxD 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40... Piotrowski, T and Nusslein-Volhard, C., 20 00, The endoderm plays an important role in patterning the segmented pharyngeal region in zebrafish (Danio rerio), Dev Biol 22 5 (2) :339–356 Price, M., 1993, Members of the Dlx- and Nk x2-gene families are regionally expressed in the developing forebrain, J Neurobiol 24 (10): 1385–1399 Reim, G and Brand, M., 20 02, Spiel-ohne-grenzen/pou2 mediates regional competence... independently of the PatchedSmoothened-Gli signaling pathway Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 (22 ): 125 21– 125 26 Tiara, M., Saint-Jeannet, J.-P., and Davwid, I.B., 1997, Role of the Xlim-1 and Xbra genes in anteroposterior patterning of neural tissue by the head and trunk organizer, PNAS 94:895–900 Tsuda, H., Sasai, N., Matsuo-Takasaki, M., Sakuragi, M., Murakami, Y., and Sasai, Y., 20 02, Dorsalization of the neural... expression of Hox -2 . 9 and Krox -2 0 and on morphological segmentation in the hindbrain of mouse embryos, EMBO 10(10) :29 85 29 95 Mukhopadhyay, M., Shtrom, S., Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Chen, L., Tsukui, T., Gomer, L et al., 20 01, Dickkopf1 is required for embryonic head induction and limb morphogenesis in the mouse, Dev Cell 1(3): 423 –434 Muroyama, Y., Fujihara, M., Ikeya, M., Kondoh, H., and Takada, S., 20 02, Wnt... Neurol 355 (2) :23 7 29 5 Anderson, D.J., 1997, Cellular and molecular biology of neural crest cell lineage determination, Trends Genet 13(7) :27 6 28 0 Artinger, K.B and Bronner-Fraser, M., 19 92, Partial restriction in the developmental potential of late emigrating avian neural crest cells, Dev Biol 149(1):149–157 Bachiller, D., Klingensmith, J., Kemp, C., Belo, J.A., Anderson, R.M., May, S.R et al., 20 00, The... revealed by the expression of Engrailed -2 , Dev Dyn 193:389–396 Doniach, T., 1993, Planar and vertical induction of anteroposterior pattern during the development of the amphibian central nervous system, J Neurobiol 24 (10): 125 6– 127 5 Dupe, V and Lumsden, A., 20 01, Hindbrain patterning involves graded responses to retinoic acid signaling, Development 128 ( 12) : 21 99 22 08 Ensini, M., Tsuchida, T.N., Belting,... implanted glass barriers, Dev Dyn 199 :22 9 24 0 Ghysen, A., Dambly-Chaudiere, C., Jan, L.Y., and Jan, Y.N., 1993, Cell interactions and gene interactions in peripheral neurogenesis, Genes Dev 7(5): 723 –733 Glavic, A., Gomez-Skarmeta, J.L., and Mayor, R., 20 02, The homeoprotein Xiro1 is required for midbrain–hindbrain boundary formation, Development 129 (7):1609–1 621 Glinka, A., Wu, W., Onichtchouk, D.,... 138–1 52 Hogan, B.L., Thaller, C., and Eichele, G., 19 92, Evidence that Hensen’s node is a site of retinoic acid synthesis, Nature 359(63 92) :23 7 24 1 Houart, C., Caneparo, L., Heisenberg, C., Barth, K., Take-Uchi, M., and Wilson, S., 20 02, Establishment of the telencephalon during gastrulation by local antagonism of Wnt signaling, Neuron 35 (2) :25 5 26 5 Houart, C., Westerfield, M., and Wilson, S.W., 1998, . Ltd.) C Rh r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 cervical thoracic lumbar sacral caudal hindbrain forebrain r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 En2 Wnt1 Elk-L3 Elf -2 Ebk- Ebk Follistatin CRABP-1 Sek-1, -3 Sek-4, Krox20 HoxA2 CRABP HoxA1, B1, D1 HoxB2 Sek -2 RAR  Fgf-3, Kreisler, Wnt2 RAR  HoxA6, B6,. Cell death in r2/4/6 Hoxa2 K20 K20 Kr 1–5 som 8–10 som 12 som 25 som Hoxb1 FIGURE 13. Model of hindbrain segmentation in mouse using wild-type and Krox20 mutants. For wild-type embryos,. sorting at boundaries Boundary formation K20 K20 Hoxa2 Hoxb1 Kr K20 K20 Hoxa2 Hoxb1 Kr Hoxa2 Hoxb1 Kr r2 r4 r6 Activation No recruitment, acquisition of r2/4/6 identity No maintenance, no sorting