Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 17 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
17
Dung lượng
552,33 KB
Nội dung
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Difference Equations Volume 2010, Article ID 262854, 17 pages doi:10.1155/2010/262854 ResearchArticlePositiveandDead-CoreSolutionsofTwo-PointSingularBoundaryValueProblemswith φ-Laplacian Svatoslav Stan ˇ ek Department of Mathematical Analysis, Faculty of Science, Palack ´ y University, T ˇ r. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic Correspondence should be addressed to Svatoslav Stan ˇ ek, stanek@inf.upol.cz Received 18 December 2009; Accepted 15 March 2010 Academic Editor: Leonid Berezansky Copyright q 2010 Svatoslav Stan ˇ ek. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The paper discusses the existence ofpositive solutions, dead-core solutions, and pseudo-dead-core solutionsof the singular problem φu λft, u,u , u0−αu 0A, uTβu 0γu TA. Here λ is a positive parameter, α>0, A>0, β ≥ 0, γ ≥ 0, f is singular at u 0, and f may be singular at u 0. 1. Introduction Consider the singularboundaryvalue problem φ u t λf t, u t ,u t ,λ>0, 1.1 u 0 − αu 0 A, u T βu 0 γu T A, α, A > 0,β,γ≥ 0, 1.2 depending on the parameter λ.Hereφ ∈ CR, f satisfies the Carath ´ eodory conditions on 0,T×D, D 0, 1β/αA×R\{0}f ∈ Car0,T×D, f is positive, lim x → 0 ft, x, y ∞ for a.e. t ∈ 0,T and each y ∈ R \{0},andf may be singular at y 0. Throughout the paper AC0,T denotes the set of absolutely continuous functions on 0,T and x max{|xt| : t ∈ 0,T} is the norm in C0,T. We investigate positive, dead-core, and pseudo-dead-core solutionsof problem 1.1, 1.2. 2 Advances in Difference Equations A function u ∈ C 1 0,T is a positive solution of problem 1.1, 1.2 if φu ∈ AC0,T, u>0on0,T, u satisfies 1.2 ,and1.1 holds for a.e. t ∈ 0,T. We say that u ∈ C 1 0,T satisfying 1.2 is a dead-core solution of problem 1.1, 1.2 if there exist 0 <t 1 <t 2 <Tsuch that u 0ont 1 ,t 2 , u>0on0,T \ t 1 ,t 2 , φu ∈ AC0,T and 1.1 holds for a.e. t ∈ 0,T \ t 1 ,t 2 . The interval t 1 ,t 2 is called the dead-coreof u.If t 1 t 2 , then u is called a pseudo-dead-core solution of problem 1.1, 1.2. The existence ofpositiveand dead core solutionsofsingular second-order differential equations with a parameter was discussed for Dirichlet boundary conditions in 1, 2 and for mixed and Robin boundary conditions in 3–5. Papers 6, 7 discuss also the existence and multiplicity ofpositiveand dead core solutionsof the singular differential equation u λgu satisfying the boundary conditions u 00, βu 1αu1A and u01, u11, respectively, and present numerical solutions. These problems are mathematical models for steady-state diffusion and reactions of several chemical species see, e.g., 4, 5, 8, 9. Positiveanddead-coresolutions to the third-order singular differential equation φ u λf t, u, u ,u ,λ>0, 1.3 satisfying the nonlocal boundary conditions u0uTA,min{ut : t ∈ 0,T} 0, were investigated in 10. We work with the following conditions on t he functions φ and f in the differential equation 1.1. Without loss of generality we can assume that 1/n < A for each n ∈ N otherwise N is replaced by N : {n ∈ N :1/n < A}, where A is from 1.2. H 1 φ : R → R is an increasing and odd homeomorphism such that φRR. H 2 f ∈ Car0,T ×D, where D 0, 1 β/αA × R \{0},and lim x → 0 f t, x, y ∞ for a.e.t ∈ 0,T and each y ∈ R \ { 0 } . 1.4 H 3 for a.e. t ∈ 0,T and all x, y ∈D, ϕ t ≤ f t, x, y ≤ p 1 x p 2 x ω 1 y ω 2 y ψ t , 1.5 where ϕ, ψ ∈ L 1 0,T, p 1 ∈ C0, 1 β/αA ∩ L 1 0, 1 β/αA, ω 1 ∈ C0, ∞, p 2 ∈ C0, 1 β/αA,andω 2 ∈ C0, ∞ are positive, p 1 ,ω 1 are nonincreasing, p 2 ,ω 2 are nondecreasing, ω 2 u ≥ u for u ∈ 0, ∞,and ∞ 0 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ∞. 1.6 The aim of this paper is to discuss the existence of positive, dead-core, and pseudo- dead-coresolutionsof problem 1.1, 1.2. Since problem 1.1, 1.2 is singular we use regularization and sequential techniques. Advances in Difference Equations 3 For this end for n ∈ N, we define f ∗ n ∈ Car0,T×D ∗ , where D ∗ 0, 1β/αA×R, and f n ∈ Car0,T × R 2 by the formulas f ∗ n t, x, y ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ f t, x, y for x, y ∈ 0, 1 β α A × R \ − 1 n , 1 n , n 2 f t, x, 1 n y 1 n for x, y ∈ 0, 1 β α A −f t, x, − 1 n y − 1 n × − 1 n , 1 n , f n t, x, y ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ f ∗ n t, 1 β α A, y for x, y ∈ 1 β α A, ∞ × R, f ∗ n t, x, y for x, y ∈ 1 n , 1 β α A × R, φ 1 n −1 φ x f ∗ n t, 1 n ,y for x, y ∈ 0, 1 n × R, x for x, y ∈ −∞, 0 × R. 1.7 Then H 2 and H 3 give ϕ t ≤ f n t, x, y for a.e.t∈ 0,T and all x, y ∈ 1 n , ∞ × R, 1.8 0 <f n t, x, y for a.e.t∈ 0,T and all x, y ∈ 0, ∞ × R, 1.9 x f n t, x, y for a.e.t∈ 0,T and all x, y ∈ −∞, 0 × R, 1.10 f n t, x, y ≤ p 1 x p 2 x ω 1 y ω 2 y ψ t for a.e.t∈ 0,T and all x, y ∈ 0, 1 β α A × R \ { 0 } , where p 2 x max p 2 x ,p 2 1 , ω 2 y max ω 2 y ,ω 2 1 . 1.11 Consider the auxiliary regular differential equation φ u t λf n t, u t ,u t ,λ>0. 1.12 A function u ∈ C 1 0,T is a solution of problem 1.12, 1.2 if φu ∈ AC0,T, u fulfils 1.2, and 1.12 holds for a.e. t ∈ 0,T. We introduce also the notion of a sequential solution of problem 1.1, 1.2.Wesay that u ∈ C 1 0,T is a sequential solution of problem 1.1, 1.2 if there exists a sequence {k n }⊂N, lim n →∞ k n ∞, such that u lim n →∞ u k n in C 1 0,T, where u k n is a solution of problem 4 Advances in Difference Equations 1.12, 1.2 with n replaced by k n .InSection 3 see Theorem 3.1 we show that any sequential solution of problem 1.1, 1.2 is either a positive solution or a pseudo-dead-core solution or a dead-core solution of this problem. The next part of our paper is divided into two sections. Section 2 is devoted to the auxiliary regular problem 1.12, 1.2. We prove the solvability of this problem by the existence principle in 11 and investigate the properties of solutions. The main results are given in Section 3. We prove that under assumptions H 1 –H 3 , for each λ>0, problem 1.1, 1.2 has a sequential solution and that any sequential solution is either a positive solution or a pseudo-dead-core solution or a dead-core solution Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.2 shows that f or sufficiently small values of λ all sequential solutionsof problem 1.1, 1.2 are positivesolutions while, by Theorem 3.3, all sequential solutions are dead-coresolutions if λ is sufficiently large. An example demonstrates the application of our results. 2. Auxiliary Regular Problems The properties ofsolutionsof problem 1.12, 1.2 are given in the following lemma. Lemma 2.1. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold. Let u n be a solution of problem 1.12, 1.2.Then 0 <u n t ≤ 1 β α A for t ∈ 0,T , 2.1 u n 0 <A, u n T < 1 β α A, 2.2 u n is increasing on 0,T and u n γ n 0 for aγ n ∈ 0,T . 2.3 Proof. Suppose that u n 0 ≥ 0. Then u n 0A αu n 0 ≥ A>0. Let τ sup { t ∈ 0,T : u s > 0fors ∈ 0,t } . 2.4 Then τ ∈ 0,T and, by 1.9, φu n > 0a.e.on0,τ. Hence φu n is increasing on 0,τ, and therefore, u n is also increasing on this interval since φ is increasing on R by H 1 . Consequently, τ T and u n > 0on0,T. Then uT >u0, which contradicts u n 0 − u n Tα βu n 0γu n T ≥ 0. Hence u n 0 < 0. Let u n 0 ≤ 0. Then u n < 0 on a right neighbourhood of t 0. Put ν sup { t ∈ 0,T : u n s < 0fors ∈ 0,t } . 2.5 Then u n < 0on0,ν, and therefore, φu n λu n < 0a.e.on0,ν, which implies that u n is decreasing on 0,ν. Now it follows from u n 0 ≤ 0andu n 0 < 0thatν T, u n < 0on 0,T and u n < 0on0,T. Consequently, u n 0 >u n T, which contradicts u n 0 − u n T α βu n 0γu n T < 0. To summarize, u n 0 > 0andu n 0 < 0. Suppose that min{u n t : t ∈ 0,T} < 0. Then there exist 0 <a<b≤ T such that u n a0, u n a ≤ 0andu n < 0ona, b. Hence φu n λu n < 0a.e.ona, b and arguing as in the above part of the proof we can verify that b T and u n < 0, u n < 0ona, T. Consequently, u n TA − βu n 0 − γu n T ≥ A, which is impossible. Hence u n ≥ 0on0,T. New it follows from 1.9 and 1.10 that Advances in Difference Equations 5 φu n ≥ 0a.e.on0,T, which together with H 1 gives that u n is nondecreasing on 0,T. Suppose that u n ξ0 for some ξ ∈ 0,T.Ifξ T, then u n T ≤ 0, which contradicts βu n 0γu n TA since u n 0 < 0. Hence ξ ∈ 0,T and u n ξ0. Let η min { t ∈ 0,T : u n t 0 } . 2.6 Then 0 <η≤ ξ<T, u n η0andu n is increasing on 0,η since φu > 0a.e.onthis interval by 1.9. Hence there exists t 1 ∈ 0,η, η − t 1 ≤ 1, such that 0 <u n < 1/n on t 1 ,η and it follows from the definition of the function f n that φ u n t Qφ u n t p t for a.e.t∈ t 1 ,η , 2.7 where Q λφ1/n −1 , ptf ∗ n t, 1/n, u n t ∈ L 1 t 1 ,η, and p>0a.e.ont 1 ,η. Integrating 2.7 over t, η ⊂ t 1 ,η yields φ −u n t −φ u n t Q η t φ u n s p s ds, t ∈ t 1 ,η . 2.8 From this equality, from H 1 and from u n tu n t − u n ηu n μt − η ≤ u n tt − η, where μ ∈ t, η,weobtain φ −u n t ≤ Qφ u n t η t p s ds ≤ Qφ −u n t η − t η t p s ds ≤ Qφ −u n t η t p s ds 2.9 for t ∈ t 1 ,η. Since φ−u n t > 0fort ∈ t 1 ,η, we have 1 ≤ Q η t p s ds for t ∈ t 1 ,η , 2.10 which is impossible. We have proved that u n t > 0fort ∈ 0,T . 2.11 Hence φu n > 0a.e.on0,T by 1.9, and therefore, u n is increasing on 0,T.Ifu n T ≤ 0, then u n < 0on0,T,andsou n 0 >u n T, which is impossible since u n 0 − u n Tα βu n 0γu n T ≤ αu n 0 < 0. Consequently, u n T > 0andu n vanishes at a unique point γ n ∈ 0,T. Hence 2.3 is true. Next, we deduce from u n 0 > 0, u n 0 < 0andfromu n 0A αu n 0 that u n 0 <A and u n 0 > −A/α. Consequently, u n TA − βu n 0 − γu n T ≤ A − βu n 0 < 1 β/αA. Hence 2.2 holds. Inequality 2.1 follows from 2.2, 2.3,and2.11. 6 Advances in Difference Equations Remark 2.2. Let u be a solution of problem 1.12, 1.2 with λ 0. Then φu 0a.e. on 0,T,andsou is a constant function. Let uta bt. Now, it follows from 1.2 that A a − αb and A a bT β γb. Consequently, α β γb −bT, and since α β γ>0, we have b 0. Hence A a,andu A is the unique solution of problem 1.12, 1.2 for λ 0. The following lemma gives a priori bounds for solutionsof problem 1.12, 1.2. Lemma 2.3. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold. Then there exists a positive constant S independent of nand depending on λ such that u n <S 2.12 for any solution u n of problem 1.12, 1.2. Proof. Let u n be a solution of problem 1.12, 1.2.ByLemma 2.1, u n satisfies 2.1–2.3. Hence u n max u n 0 ,u n T . 2.13 In view of 1.11, φ u n t u n t ≥ λ p 1 u n t p 2 u n t ω 1 −u n t ω 2 −u n t ψ t u n t 2.14 for a.e. t ∈ 0,γ n and φ u n t u n t ≤ λ p 1 u n t p 2 u n t ω 1 u n t ω 2 u n t ψ t u n t 2.15 for a.e. t ∈ γ n ,T. Since ω 2 u ≥ u for u ∈ 0, ∞ by H 3 , we have u n t ω 1 −u n t ω 2 −u n t ≥−1fort ∈ 0,γ n , u n t ω 1 u n t ω 2 u n t ≤ 1fort ∈ γ n ,T . 2.16 Therefore, φ u n t u n t ω 1 −u n t ω 2 −u n t ≥ λ p 1 u n t p 2 u n t u n t − ψ t 2.17 for a.e. t ∈ 0,γ n and φ u n t u n t ω 1 u n t ω 2 u n t ≤ λ p 1 u n t p 2 u n t u n t ψ t 2.18 Advances in Difference Equations 7 for a.e. t ∈ γ n ,T. Integrating 2.17 over 0,γ n and 2.18 over γ n ,T gives φ|u n 0| 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ≤ λ u n 0 u n γ n p 1 s p 2 s ds γ n 0 ψ t dt <λ A 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds T 0 ψ t dt , 2.19 φu n T 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ≤ λ u n T u n γ n p 1 s p 2 s ds T γ n ψ t dt <λ 1β/αA 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds T 0 ψ t dt , 2.20 respectively. We now show that condition 1.6 implies ∞ 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ∞. 2.21 Since lim y →∞ ω 2 y∞ by H 3 , we have lim y →∞ ω 1 y ω 2 y/ ω 2 y1. Therefore, there exists y ∗ ∈ φ1, ∞ such that ω 1 φ −1 y ω 2 φ −1 y ≤ 2 ω 2 φ −1 y 2ω 2 φ −1 y for y ∈ y ∗ , ∞ . 2.22 Then ∞ 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds> ∞ y ∗ φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ≥ 1 2 ∞ y ∗ φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds, 2.23 and 2.21 follows from 1.6. Since 1β/αA 0 p 1 tp 2 tdt<∞, inequality 2.21 guarantees the existence of a positive constant M such that y 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds ≥ λ 1β/αA 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds T 0 ψ t dt 2.24 for all y ≥ M. Hence 2.19 and 2.20 imply max{φ|u n 0|,φu n T} <M. Consequently, max{|u n 0|,u n T} <φ −1 M and equality 2.13 shows that 2.12 is true for S φ −1 M. 8 Advances in Difference Equations Remark 2.4. By Lemma 2.3, estimate 2.12 is true for any solution u n of problem 1.12, 1.2, where S is a positive constant independent of n and depending on λ.Fixλ>0 and consider the differential equation φ u μλf n t, u, u ,μ∈ 0, 1 . 2.25 It follows from the proof of Lemma 2.3 that u <Sfor each μ ∈ 0, 1 and any solution u of problem 2.25, 1.2. Since u A is the unique solution of this problem with μ 0by Remark 2.2, we have u <Sfor each μ ∈ 0, 1 and any solution u of problem 2.25, 1.2. We are now in the position to show that problem 1.12, 1.2 has a solution. Let χ j : C 1 0,T → R, j 1, 2, be defined by χ 1 x x 0 − αx 0 − A, χ 2 x x T βx 0 γu T − A, 2.26 where α, β, γ, and A are as in 1.2. We say that the functionals χ 1 and χ 2 are compatible if for each ρ ∈ 0, 1 the system χ j a bt − ρχ j −a − bt 0,j 1, 2, 2.27 has a solution a, b ∈ R 2 . We apply the following existence principle which follows from 11–13 to prove the solvability of problem 1.12, 1.2. Proposition 2.5. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold. Let there exist positive constants S 0 ,S 1 such that u <S 0 , u <S 1 2.28 for each μ ∈ 0, 1 and any solution u of problem 2.25, 1.2. Also assume that χ 1 and χ 2 are compatible and there exist positive constants Λ 0 , Λ 1 such that | a | < Λ 0 , | b | < Λ 1 2.29 for each ρ ∈ 0, 1 and each solution a, b ∈ R 2 of system 2.27. Then problem 1.12 , 1.2 has a solution. Lemma 2.6. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold. Then problem 1.12, 1.2 has a solution. Proof. By Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3 and Remark 2.4, there exists a positive constant S such that 0 <u t ≤ 1 β α A for t ∈ 0,T , u <S 2.30 for each μ ∈ 0, 1 and any solution u of problem 2.25 , 1.2. Hence 2.28 is true for S 0 1 β/αA and S 1 S.System2.27 has the form of 1 ρ a − αb 1 − ρ A, 1 ρ a bT βb γb 1 − ρ A. 2.31 Advances in Difference Equations 9 Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get 1 ρT α β γb 0. Due to 1 ρT α β γ > 0forρ ∈ 0, 1, we have b 0, and consequently, a 1 − ρA/1 ρ. Hence a, b1 − ρA/1 ρ, 0 is the unique solution of system 2.31. Therefore, χ 1 and χ 2 are compatible and 2.29 is fulfilled for Λ 0 A 1andΛ 1 1. The result now follows from Proposition 2.5. The following result deals with the sequences ofsolutionsof problem 1.12, 1.2. Lemma 2.7. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold and let u n be a solution of problem 1.12, 1.2.Then{u n } is equicontinuous on 0,T. Proof. By Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3, relations 2.1–2.3 and 2.12 hold, where S is a positive constant. Let H ∈ C0, ∞, H ∗ ∈ CR, and P ∈ AC0, 1 β/αA be defined by the formulas H v φv 0 φ −1 v ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds for v ∈ 0, ∞ , H ∗ v ⎧ ⎨ ⎩ H v for v ∈ 0, ∞ , −H −v for v ∈ −∞, 0 , P v v 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds for v ∈ 0, 1 β α A , 2.32 where p 2 and ω 2 are given in 1.11. Then H ∗ is an increasing and odd function on R, H ∗ R R by 2.21,andP is increasing on 0, 1 β/αA. Since {u n } is bounded in C0,T, {u n } is equicontinuous on 0,T, and consequently, {Pu n } is equicontinuous on 0,T, too. Let us choose an arbitrary ε>0. Then there exists ρ>0 such that | P u n t 1 − P u n t 2 | <ε, t 2 t 1 ψ t dt <ε for t 1 ,t 2 ∈ 0,T , | t 1 − t 2 | <ρ, n∈ N. 2.33 In order to prove that {u n } is equicontinuous on 0,T,let0≤ t 1 <t 2 ≤ T and t 2 − t 1 <ρ.If t 2 ≤ γ n , then integrating 2.17 from t 1 to t 2 gives 0 <H ∗ u n t 2 − H ∗ u n t 1 ≤ λ P u n t 1 − P u n t 2 t 2 t 1 ψ t dt < 2λε. 2.34 If t 1 ≥ γ n , then integrating 2.18 over t 1 ,t 2 yields 0 <H ∗ u n t 2 − H ∗ u n t 1 ≤ λ P u n t 2 − P u n t 1 t 2 t 1 ψ t dt < 2λε. 2.35 Finally, if t 1 <γ n <t 2 , then one can check that 0 <H ∗ u n t 2 − H ∗ u n t 1 < 3λε. 2.36 10 Advances in Difference Equations To summarize, we have 0 ≤ H ∗ u n t 2 − H ∗ u n t 1 < 3λε, n ∈ N, 2.37 whenever 0 ≤ t 1 <t 2 ≤ T and t 2 −t 1 <ρ. Hence {H ∗ u n } is equicontinuous on 0,T and, since {u n } is bounded in C0,T and H ∗ is continuous and increasing on R, {u n } is equicontinuous on 0,T. The results of the following two lemmas we use in the proofs of the existence ofpositiveanddead-coresolutions to problem 1.1, 1.2. Lemma 2.8. Let (H 1 )–(H 3 ) hold. Then there exist λ ∗ > 0 and ε>0 such that u n t >ε for t ∈ 0,T ,n∈ N, 2.38 where u n is any solution of problem 1.12, 1.2 with λ ∈ 0,λ ∗ . Proof. Suppose that the lemma was false. Then we could find sequences {k m }⊂N and {λ m }⊂ 0, ∞, lim m →∞ λ m 0, and a solution u m of the equation φu λ m f k m t, u, u satisfying 1.2 such that lim m →∞ u m ξ m 0, where u m ξ m min{u m t : t ∈ 0,T}.Notethatu m > 0 on 0,T, u m < 0on0,ξ m , u m ξ m 0, and u m > 0onξ m ,T for each m ∈ N by Lemma 2.1. Then, by 1.11, φ u m t ≤ λ m p 1 u m t p 2 u m t ω 1 −u m t ω 2 −u m t ψ t 2.39 for a.e. t ∈ 0,ξ m , φ u m t ≤ λ m p 1 u m t p 2 u m t ω 1 u m t ω 2 u m t ψ t 2.40 for a.e. t ∈ ξ m ,T,andcf. 2.13 u m max u m 0 ,u m T . 2.41 Essentially, the same reasoning as in the proof of Lemma 2.3 gives that for m ∈ N cf. 2.19 and 2.20 φ|u m 0| 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds<λ m A 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds T 0 ψ t dt , φu m T 0 φ −1 s ω 1 φ −1 s ω 2 φ −1 s ds<λ m 1β/αA 0 p 1 s p 2 s ds T 0 ψ t dt . 2.42 In view of lim m →∞ λ m 0, we have lim m →∞ u m 00, lim m →∞ u m T0. Consequently, lim m →∞ u m 0by2.41. We now deduce from u m tu m ξ m t ξ m u m t dt for t ∈ 0,T [...]... Equations 17 6 G Pulverer, S Stanˇ k, and E B Weinmuller, “Analysis and numerical solutionsofpositiveand dead e ¨ core solutionsofsingular Sturm-Liouville problems, ” submitted 7 S Stanˇ k, G Pulverer, and E B Weinmuller, “Analysis and numerical simulation ofpositiveand e ¨ dead-coresolutionsofsingulartwo-pointboundaryvalue problems, ” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 56, no 7,... O’Regan, and S Stanˇ k, Positiveand dead core solutionsofsingular Dirichlet e boundaryvalueproblemswith φ-Laplacian,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 54, no 2, pp 255–266, 2007 2 R P Agarwal, D O’Regan, and S Stanˇ k, “Dead cores ofsingular Dirichlet boundaryvalueproblems e with φ-Laplacian,” Applications of Mathematics, vol 53, no 4, pp 381–399, 2008 3 R P Agarwal, D O’Regan, and. .. either a positive solution or a pseudo -dead-core solution or a dead-core solution If the values of λ are sufficiently small, then all sequential solutionsof problem 3.17 , 1.2 are positivesolutions by Theorem 3.2 Theorem 3.3 guarantees that all sequential solutionsof problem 3.17 , 1.2 are dead-coresolutions for sufficiently large values of λ Acknowledgment This work was supported by the Council of Czech... Agarwal, D O’Regan, and S Stanˇ k, “General existence principles for nonlocal boundaryvalue e problemswith φ-Laplacian and their applications,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol 2006, Article ID 96826, 30 pages, 2006 12 I Rachunkov´ , S Stanˇ k, and M Tvrdy, “Singularities and Laplacians in boundaryvalueproblems a e ˚ ´ for nonlinear ordinary differential equations,” in Handbook of Differential Equations:... k, “Dead core problems for singular equations with φe Laplacian,” BoundaryValue Problems, vol 2007, Article ID 18961, 16 pages, 2007 4 J V Baxley and G S Gersdorff, Singular reaction-diffusion boundaryvalue problems, ” Journal of Differential Equations, vol 115, no 2, pp 441–457, 1995 5 L E Bobisud, “Asymptotic dead cores for reaction-diffusion equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,... pp 1820–1837, 2008 8 R Aris, The Mathematical Theory of Diffusion and Reaction in Permeable Catalysts, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1975 9 L E Bobisud, D O’Regan, and W D Royalty, “Existence and nonexistence for a singularboundaryvalue problem,” Applicable Analysis, vol 28, no 4, pp 245–256, 1988 10 S Stanˇ k, Positiveand dead core solutionsofsingular BVPs for third-order differential equations,”... that the dead-coreof u contains the interval c1 , c2 Consequently, all sequential solutionsof problem 1.1 , 1.2 are dead-coresolutions for sufficiently large valueof λ 16 Advances in Difference Equations Proof Fix 0 < c1 < c2 < T Then, by Lemma 2.9, there exists λ∗ > 0 such that lim un cj 0 for j n→∞ 1, 2, 3.16 where un is any solution of problem 1.12 , 1.2 with λ > λ∗ Let us choose λ > λ∗ and let... u is a dead-core solution of problem 1.1 , 1.2 if ρ1 < ρ2 , and u is a pseudo -dead-core solution if ρ1 ρ2 Theorem 3.2 Let (H1 )–(H3 ) hold Then there exists λ∗ > 0 such that for each λ ∈ 0, λ∗ , all sequential solutionsof problem 1.1 , 1.2 are positivesolutions Proof Let λ∗ > 0 and ε > 0 be given in Lemma 2.8 Let us choose an arbitrary λ ∈ 0, λ∗ Then 2.38 holds, where un is any solution of problem... Ordinary Differential Equations Vol III, A Canada, P Dr´ bek, and A Fonda, Eds., Handbook of Differential a ˜ Equations, pp 607–722, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006 13 I Rachunkov´ , S Stanˇ k, and M Tvrdy, Solvability of Nonlinear SingularProblems for Ordinary a e ˚ ´ Differential Equations, vol 5 of Contemporary Mathematics and Its Applications, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, New... problem 1.12 , 1.2 with n replaced by A and u T βu 0 γu T A, that is, u fulfils the boundary kn Hence u 0 − αu 0 condition 1.2 It follows from the properties of ukn given in Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3 that 0 ≤ u t ≤ 1 β/α A for t ∈ 0, T , u is nondecreasing on 0, T and ukn < S for n ∈ N, where S is a positive constant The next part of the proof is divided into two cases if min{u t : t ∈ 0, T } is positive, or is . Equations Volume 2010, Article ID 262854, 17 pages doi:10.1155/2010/262854 Research Article Positive and Dead-Core Solutions of Two-Point Singular Boundary Value Problems with φ-Laplacian Svatoslav. numerical solutions of positive and dead core solutions of singular Sturm-Liouville problems, ” submitted. 7 S. Stan ˇ ek,G.Pulverer,andE.B.Weinm ¨ uller, “Analysis and numerical simulation of positive. Council of Czech Government MSM 6198959214. References 1 R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan, and S. Stan ˇ ek, Positive and dead core solutions of singular Dirichlet boundary value problems with φ-Laplacian,”