5. Luận án tiến sĩ. N17710006. Giản Thị Lê Na. Luận án cấp cơ sở đào tạo

I H C QU C GIA THÀNH PH H CHệ MINH TR NG I H C KINH T - LU T GI N TH LÊ NA VI PH M H P NG HI U QU Tp H Chí Minh, n m 2022 I H C QU C GIA THÀNH PH H CHệ MINH TR NG I H C KINH T - LU T GI N TH LÊ NA VI PH M H P NG HI U QU LU N ÁN TI N S LU T H C Chuyên ngƠnh: Lu t Kinh t Mư s chuyên ngƠnh: 62.38.01.07 NG IH NG D N KHOA H C HD1: PGS TS D NG ANH S N HD2 TS PH M TRệ HÙNG Tp H Chí Minh, n m 2022 L I CAM OAN Tôi cam đoan lu n án nƠy lƠ công trình tơi th c hi n M i s li u, k t qu nghiên c u đư công b đ c tham kh o lu n án đ u trung th c vƠ trích d n ngu n quy đ nh Nh ng k t qu nghiên c u c a lu n án ch a t ng đ c công b b t k cơng trình c a tác gi nƠo khác Nghiên c u sinh Gi n Th Lê Na DANH M C T T vi t t t BLDS CISG VI T T T Ti ng Anh Principles of European Contract Law Priniples of International Commercial Contracts Ngh a ti ng Vi t B lu t Dơn s Công c Liên hi p qu c v h p đ ng mua bán hƠng hóa qu c t (Cơng c Viên 1980) Lu t Th ng m i B nguyên t c lu t h p đ ng Châu Âu B nguyên t c v h p đ ng th ng m i qu c t United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Tòa án nhân dân Trách nhi m h u h n M t thƠnh viên y ban Liên h p qu c v lu t th ng m i qu c t United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods LTM PECL PICC TAND TNHH MTV UNCITRAL M CL C PH N M U 1 LỦ ch n đ tƠi M c tiêu nghiên c u it 3.1 ng vƠ ph m vi nghiên c u it ng nghiên c u 3.2 Ph m vi nghiên c u i m m i khoa h c c a lu n án CH NG T NG QUAN V V N NGHIÊN C U 1.1 Tình hình nghiên c u 1.1.1 Các cơng trình nghiên c u n c 1.1.1.1 Các cơng trình nghiên c u liên quan đ n vi ph m h p đ ng, ch tƠi bu c th c hi n ngh a v h p đ ng 1.1.1.2 Các cơng trình nghiên c u liên quan đ n b i th ng thi t h i vi ph m h p đ ng 10 1.1.1.3 Các cơng trình nghiên c u v kinh t h c pháp lu t đ i v i l nh v c h p đ ng 14 1.1.2 Các cơng trình nghiên c u n c ngoƠi 16 1.1.2.1 Các cơng trình nghiên c u lƠm rõ n i dung thuy t vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 16 1.1.2.2 Các công trình nghiên c u v kho n thi t h i c n đ th ng vƠ nguyên t c b i th c xem xét b i ng thi t h i có vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 20 1.1.2.3 Các cơng trình nghiên c u v ch tƠi bu c th c hi n ngh a v u c u thu h i l i ích có đ c t s vi ph m (disgorgement) m i t ng quan v i vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 23 1.1.2.4 Các cơng trình nghiên c u liên quan đ n v n đ đ o đ c đ i v i vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 29 1.1.3 ánh giá chung v tình hình nghiên c u 33 1.1.3.1 ánh giá chung v tình hình nghiên c u n 1.1.3.2 ánh giá chung v tình hình nghiên c u n c 33 c ngoƠi 34 1.2 C s lỦ thuy t 34 1.2.1 LỦ thuy t v lu t t nhiên 34 1.2.2 Thuy t v l i 35 1.2.3 LỦ thuy t chi phí giao d ch 36 1.2.4 LỦ thuy t hi u qu Pareto 38 1.2.5 LỦ thuy t bƠn tay vơ hình 39 1.2.6 LỦ thuy t l i th so sánh c a David Ricardo 40 1.3 Cơu h i nghiên c u 41 1.4 Ph ng pháp nghiên c u 44 1.4.1 Ph ng pháp phơn tích 44 1.4.2 Ph ng pháp t ng h p 44 1.4.3 Ph ng pháp so sánh lu t h c 44 1.4.4 Ph ng pháp l ch s 46 1.5 K t c u c a lu n án 46 CH NG NH N DI N VI PH M H P NG HI U QU 47 2.1 Khái quát vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 47 2.1.1 Vi ph m h p đ ng vƠ lỦ c a s vi ph m 47 2.1.2 Khái ni m vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 49 2.2 Các tr ng h p c a vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 52 2.2.1 Vi ph m đ gi m thi u t n th t 53 2.2.1.1 Công th c c a s vi ph m đ gi m thi u t n th t 53 2.2.1.2 Các tình hu ng v vi ph m đ gi m thi u t n th t 58 2.2.2 Vi ph m l i ích l n h n 60 2.2.2.1 Công th c c a s vi ph m l i ích l n h n 60 2.2.2.2.Các tình hu ng v vi ph m l i ích l n h n 64 K t lu n ch CH ng 70 NG XÁC PH M H P NH THI T H I C N PH I C B I TH NG TRONG VI NG HI U QU 71 3.1 Xác đ nh thi t h i v t ch t 72 3.1.1 Các lo i thi t h i v t ch t 72 3.1.2 Kho n l i mong đ i c a bên bi vi ph m 75 3.1.2.1 C s lỦ thuy t cho kho n l i mong đ i 75 3.1.2.2 Tính t i u hóa l i ích xư h i c a b i th ng kho n l i mong đ i 77 3.1.2.3 Cơng th c tính kho n l i mong đ i 82 3.1.3 Ki n ngh hoƠn thi n quy đ nh v b i th ng thi t h i v t ch t đ có c s th a nh n vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 85 3.2 Xác đ nh thi t h i v tinh th n 89 3.2.1 C s cho vi c b i th ng thi t h i v tinh th n h p đ ng 89 3.2.2 Các quan m v kho n thi t h i tinh th n h p đ ng 91 3.2.3 Quy đ nh c a pháp lu t Vi t Nam, s t v b i th ng thích v i pháp lu t h p đ ng th gi i ng thi t h i tinh th n h p đ ng vƠ th c ti n xét x 95 3.3 Xác đ nh thi t h i c tính 101 3.3.1 B n ch t c a thi t h i c tính vƠ quy đ nh c a pháp lu t v b i th ng thi t h i c tính 102 3.3.2 Th c ti n xét x tranh ch p liên quan đ n th a thu n b i th ng thi t h i c tính vƠ ki n ngh 108 K t lu n ch CH ng 115 NG NH NG TR NG I C A VI C TH A NH N VI PH M H P NG HI U QU 118 4.1 Bu c th c hi n ngh a v 118 4.1.1 Bu c th c hi n ngh a v hai h th ng pháp lu t Civil Law vƠ Common Law 118 4.1.2 Bu c th c hi n ngh a v pháp lu t h p đ ng Vi t Nam 123 4.2 Thu h i l i ích có đ c hƠnh vi sai trái 130 4.2.1 Thu h i l i ích có đ c hƠnh vi sai trái (disgorgement) pháp lu t h p đ ng Anh ậ M 131 4.2.2 Thu h i l i ích có đ c hƠnh vi sai trái (disgorgement) pháp lu t h p đ ng Chơu Âu l c đ a 133 4.3 V n đ đ o đ c c a vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 134 4.3.1 Các ph n đ i v đ o đ c đ i v i vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 135 4.3.2 o đ c l i h a vƠ h p đ ng 136 4.3.3 Ph m vi phù h p đ o đ c c a vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu 139 4.3.1.1 LỦ c a vi ph m hi u qu 139 4.3.1.2 Vi ph m hi u qu - Ngo i l c a nguyên t c “đ o đ c l i h a” (“promissory morality”) 141 4.3.1.3 Vi ph m h p đ ng không đ y đ 143 4.4 S khác bi t vai trò gi i thích pháp lu t c a th m phán 147 4.4.1 Vai trị gi i thích pháp lu t c a th m phán h th ng lu t Common Law Civil Law 147 4.4.2 Vai trò gi i thích pháp lu t c a th m phán Vi t Nam trình áp d ng pháp lu t 149 K t lu n ch ng 152 K T LU N 155 DANH M C TÀI LI U THAM KH O i DANH M C CỌNG TRỊNH NGHIÊN C U xiv PH N M U LỦ ch n đ tài S giao thoa gi a kinh t vƠ lu t lƠ v n đ thú v đ i v i nhƠ nghiên c u, c nh ng nhƠ nghiên c u lu t h c c ng nh kinh t h c Các v n đ pháp lỦ đ m Tr c phơn tích d i khía c nh kinh t ln mang l i nh ng góc nhìn m i ng phái kinh t - lu t, đ c g i tr nghiên c u pháp lu t b ng nh ng tri th c, ph ng phái kinh t h c pháp lu t ng pháp c a kinh t h c Vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu (Efficient Breach) - m t v n đ pháp lỦ thu c h th ng lu t pháp Common Law c ng đư đ c nhìn nh n d i l ng kính nƠy Trong th c ti n, vi ph m pháp lu t nói chung vƠ vi ph m h p đ ng nói riêng lƠ nh ng hƠnh vi th ng g p vƠ th ng đ c nhìn nh n m t cách tiêu c c vƠ b lên án Các ch th vi ph m pháp lu t, vi ph m h p đ ng c ng v y mƠ bu c ph i gánh ch u nh ng ch tƠi mƠ m c đ nghiêm kh c ph thu c vƠo m c đ nguy hi m cho xư h i vƠ m c đ thi t h i hƠnh vi vi ph m gơy Tuy nhiên, t c a ng i thay đ i vƠ phát tri n theo th i gian, v y nên cách nhìn nh n s v t, hi n t ng vƠ m i liên h gi a s v t, hi n t ng c ng có s thay đ i1 Quy đ nh c a pháp lu t có ph i lúc nƠo c ng t t vƠ vi c th c hi n quy đ nh pháp lu t có ph i bao gi c ng đ m b o cơng lỦ? Có l khơng ph i bao gi c ng v y m t quy đ nh c a pháp lu t cho dù có t t đ n m y t i th i m ban hƠnh c ng s có th tr nên khơng cịn phù h p xư h i thay đ i Các u kho n c a h p đ ng bên tho thu n ho c pháp lu t quy đ nh khơng ph i bao gi c ng có th tiên li u tr t ng lai h p đ ng đ cho bên, cho nhƠ n cđ c t t c m i tình hu ng x y c th c hi n vƠ không lo i tr tr ng h p s lƠ t t h n c ho c cho xư h i n u m t bên vi ph m h p đ ng Có th nói t i th i m kỦ k t, th c hi n h p đ ng đ đ t đ m c tiêu đ ch c l i ích ng t i c a bên VƠ khó có th hình dung m t l i bên tham gia kỦ k t h p đ ng v i m c đích đ sau nƠy vi ph m (tr HoƠng V nh Long, D ng Anh S n, T h p đ ng - T bàn tay vơ hình đ n ch ngh a can thi p, T p chí Nghiên c u Kinh t , s 6/2011 tr ng h p bên tham gia thi u trung th c, thi n chí vƠ có m c đích x u t đ u quan h h p đ ng) Tuy nhiên, r t nhi u tr th c hi n h p đ ng đ n c a bên không đ t đ ng h p m c đích c m t bên đư có s vi ph m h p đ ng S vi ph m nƠy xu t phát t nhi u nguyên nhơn khác có ngun nhơn v l i ích kinh t Các nhƠ kinh t h c vƠ lu t h c đư nhìn nh n vƠ phơn tích ngun nhơn kinh t c a s vi ph m h p đ ng vƠ đ ng th i đ i sánh l i ích kinh t c a ng i vi ph m, ng i b vi ph m vƠ t ng l i ích xư h i Thuy t vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu (Efficient Breach Theory) đ c hình thƠnh d a c s C ng nh r t nhi u nh ng h c thuy t khác, thuy t vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu c ng nh n đ c r t nhi u s đ ng tình nh ng bên c nh c ng đư có khơng Ủ ki n ph n đ i v i quan m nƠy ph đ c V i nhi u ng ng di n đ o i, h p đ ng lƠ m t l i h a Khi bên đư tham gia kỦ k t h p đ ng ph i th c hi n l i h a đó, th vi ph m h p đ ng lƠ m t v n đ sai trái2 Tuy nhiên nh ng ng i ng h cho thuy t vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu cho r ng ngh a v gi h p đ ng theo thơng lu t khơng có khác ngồi vi c b n ph i tr ti n b i th ng n u b n khơng gi nó3 ng th i theo h , xét d góc đ kinh t , m t h p đ ng mua bán, n u s vi ph m c a ng th t o l i nhu n cao h n vƠ đ ng th i l i không gây thi t h i cho ng khơng có m t lý kinh t nƠo đ cho r ng bên bán lƠ ng cách khác, theo tr i i bán có i mua i có l i4 Hay nói ng phái kinh t lu t khơng có chuy n hay sai vi ph m h p đ ng mà ch có hi u qu hay khơng hi u qu B i l tr t h c pháp lu t cho r ng, lu t thay đ i theo h ng phái kinh ng ngƠy cƠng t ng tính hi u qu , m t u lu t hi u qu m t u lu t có th t i đa hóa l i l i ích c a t t c thành viên xã h i6 Tess Wilkinson-Ryan, “Legal Promise and Psychological Contract” (2012) 47 Wake Forest L Rev 843, p.843-873 Oliver Wendell Holmes, “The Path of the Law” (1997) 110 Harvard Law Review 991, p.991-1009 Daniel Friedmann, “The Efficient Breach Fallacy” (1989) 18 The Journal of Legal Studies 1, p.1-24 Lê N t, Giáo Trình Kinh T Lu t (NXB Tri Th c 2006), tr.84 Lê N t, tlđd, tr.180 C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an 157 đ i kho ng không pháp lỦ thu n l i đ pháp lu t h p đ ng Vi t Nam ti p nh n nh ng v n đ pháp lỦ m i m , hi n đ i, có vi ph m h p đ ng hi u qu Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an i DANH M C TĨI LI U THAM KH O A V n b n quy ph m pháp lu t I Trong n c Công c Viên 1980 v H p đ ng mua bán hàng hóa qu c t B lu t Dơn s n m 2005 s 33/2005/QH11 thông qua ngày 14 tháng n m 2005 B lu t Dơn s n m 2015 s 91/2015/QH13 thông qua ngƠy 24 tháng 11 n m 2015 Hi n pháp n m 2013 Lu t Th ng m i 2005 s 36/2005/QH11 thông qua ngƠy 14 tháng n m 2005 Lu t ban hƠnh v n b n quy ph m pháp lu t s 80/2015/QH13 thông qua ngƠy 22 tháng n m 2015 Ngh Quy t 03/2006/NQ-H TP NgƠy 8/7/2006 H quy đ nh c a B lu t Dơn s n m 2005 v b i th ng d n áp d ng m t s ng thi t h i ngoƠi h p đ ng Quy ch Tòa án qu c t n m 1945 II N c ngoƠi German Civil Code 10 French Civil Code 11 Russian Civil Code 12 Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) 13 Priniples of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) 14 Restatement (Second) of Contracts 15 Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 of England 16 Uniform Commercial Code of USA (UCC) 17 The Common European Sales Law (CESL) B SÁCH, BĨI VI T, GIÁO TRÌNH I Trong n c Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an ii Nguy n V n C ng, Tr ng H ng Quang, Tr ng phái kinh t h c pháp lu t kh n ng ng d ng vào Vi t Nam, T p chí Nghiên c u l p pháp, 2012, s (213) Ngô C ng, Th m phán v i vi c gi i thích pháp lu t, T p chí Tịa án nhân dơn n t V n i, Các bi n pháp x lý vi c không th c hi n h p đ ng pháp lu t Vi t Nam, Nxb Chính tr Qu c gia HƠ N i, n m 2010 vƠ đ c tái b n n m 2013 (có s a ch a, b sung) V n i, Lu t H p ng Vi t Nam – B n Án Bình Lu n B n Án (NXB Chính tr Qu c gia 2011) Robert H Frank, Nhà T Nhiên Kinh T , T i Sao Kinh T H c Có Th Lý Gi i M i i u (NXB Tr 2010) Lê Th Tuy t HƠ Trách nhi m pháp lý vi ph m h p đ ng th ng m i Vi t Nam hi n nay, Lu n án Ti n s , Vi n Khoa h c vƠ Xư h i, n m 2016 Bùi Th Thanh H ng, B i th ti n s , ng thi t h i vi ph m h p đ ng, Lu n án i h c Lu t HƠ N i, n m 2016 Bùi Th Thanh H ng, Trách nhi m dân s ", "ch tài" hay" bi n pháp kh c ph c" đ i v i hành vi vi ph m h p đ ng, T p chí Nghiên c u l p pháp, 2017, S (331), Tr 31-37 Tr nh Th c Hi n, Án l Vi t Nam: M t bi n th c a v n b n quy ph m pháp lu t?, T p chí NhƠ n c vƠ pháp lu t, 2019, s 5, Tr.3 10 Nguy n Th Thanh Huy n, B n ch t pháp lý c a th a thu n tr c h p đ ng v vi c tr m t kho n ti n xác đ nh có hành vi vi ph m h p đ ng, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ s (2017) 11 Nguy n Th Thanh Huy n, M i quan h nhân qu v n đ gi i h n trách nhi m b i th ng thi t h i pháp lu t th ng m i, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ s (116) 2018 Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an iii 12 Nguy n Th Thanh Huy n, Bàn v c s t n t i v n đ gi i h n ph m vi áp d ng c a ch tài bu c th c hi n h p đ ng, T p chí NhƠ n c pháp lu t s 3/2021 13 Nguy n Th Lan H ng, Ngô Nguy n Th o Vy, Quy n bu c th c hi n h p đ ng theo quy đ nh c a Công c Liên h p qu c v h p đ ng mua bán hàng hóa qu c t - M t s đ xu t cho Vi t Nam, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ s (2017) 14 Nguy n Vinh H ng, Kinh t h c pháp lu t s phù h p t i Vi t Nam, T p chí Ngh lu t, 2016, S 2, Tr 20-24 15 D ng Th Thanh Mai, Ngô Huy C ng, V tr ng phái Kinh t h c pháp lu t, Vi n Khoa h c pháp lỦ ậ B t pháp, Nxb Chính tr Qu c gia, n m 2012 16 Võ S M nh, Vi ph m c b n h p đ ng theo Cơng đ ng mua bán hàng hóa qu c t đ nh h c Viên 1980 v h p ng hoàn thi n quy đ nh có liên quan c a pháp lu t Vi t Nam, Lu n án ti n s , i h c Lu t Tp H Chí Minh, n m 2015 17 Nguy n V n Nam, Lu t La mã s hình thành phát tri n c a h th ng pháp lu t Châu Âu l c đ a, T p chí NhƠ n c vƠ pháp lu t s (2006) 18 Lê N t, Kinh t lu t, Nxb Tri th c, n m 2006 19 inh V Trang Ngơn, Công lý: Làm vi c đúng? Ai x ng đáng u gì?, Ch ng trình Gi ng d y Kinh t Fulbright https://fsppm.fulbright.edu.vn/cache/MPP7-502-LN13VCong%20ly_Lam%20viec%20gi%20la%20dung-Dinh%20Vu%20Trang%20Ngan-2014-11-07-11382845.pdf 20 Ph m Duy Ngh a, i u ch nh thông tin b t cân x ng qu n lý r i ro pháp lu t h p đ ng Vi t Nam, T p chí Nghiên c u l p pháp, 2003, s 5/2003, Tr 38-46 21 Tr ng Nh t Quang, Hi u l c c a th a thu n b i th T p chí Nghiên c u L p pháp s (2021) Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn ng thi t h i c tính, C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an iv 22 Phan Th Thu Th y, So sánh quy đ nh v trách nhi m vi ph m h p đ ng LTM Vi t Nam 2005 Công c Viên 1980, T p chí Khoa h c HQGHN: Lu t h c, T p 30, S (2014), Tr 50-60 23 Nguy n Thùy Trang, Bình lu n v bi n pháp x lý vi ph m h p đ ng B lu t Dân s n m 2015, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ s (2017) 24 Nguy n Th H ng Trinh, Ch tài b i th Qu c t qua Lu t Th ng thi t h i th ng m i Vi t Nam, Công ng m i c CISG B nguyên t c UNIDROIT, T p chí Nghiên c u l p pháp, s 22 (2009) 25 Nguy n Th H ng Trinh, Bùi Th Qu nh Trang, B i th ng thi t h i tinh th n cho pháp nhân hành vi vi ph m h p đ ng khuôn kh CISG, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ Vi t Nam s (2020) 26 Nguy n Xuơn Tùng, H c thuy t lu t t nhiên m t s v n đ công tác đào t o cán b pháp lu t giai đo n hi n 27 Nguy n V n Tuy n, Tính hi u qu c a Lu t Ch ng khoán – S ti p c n t góc đ Kinh t h c pháp lu t, T p chí Lu t h c, 2006, s 08, Tr 53-59 28 Michael Sandel, Ph i Trái, úng Sai (Justice What’s the Right Thing to Do?) (NXB Tr 2011) 29 D ng Anh S n, Lê Th Bích Th , M t s ý ki n v ph t vi ph m vi ph m h p đ ng theo quy đ nh c a pháp lu t Vi t Nam, T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ, 2005, s 30 D ng Anh S n, HoƠng V nh Long, T h p đ ng - T bàn tay vô hình đ n ch ngh a can thi p, T p chí Nghiên c u Kinh t , 2011, S 6(397) 31 D ng Anh S n vƠ HoƠng V nh Long, Th bàn v b n ch t h p đ ng t góc đ kinh t h c, T p chí NhƠ n 32 D c vƠ pháp lu t, 2013, s (289) ng Anh S n, Nh ng yêu c u c n ph i đ c đ t xây d ng ch đ nh h p đ ng B lu t Dân s , T p chí Khoa h c pháp lỦ Vi t Nam, s (2013), Tr 48 Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an v 33 Nguy n Qu c Vinh, Ba v n đ vi ph m ngh a v h p đ ng BLDS 2005: kinh nghi m nhìn t Nh t B n, T p chí Nghiên c u l p pháp, 2005, s 12, Tr 57-63 34 Raymond Wacks, Tri t H c Lu t Pháp (Ki u Tùng D ch) (Nxb Tri Th c 2011) 35 Trung tơm tr ng tƠi qu c t Vi t Nam (VIAC), 50 Phán Quy t Tr ng Tài Qu c T Ch n L c https://vietnamarbitration.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/viac-50-phanquyet-trong-tai-quoc-te-chonloc.pdf?fbclid=IwAR10jzByEiklyM0Qi7bwVChCZEzuRkWI2456goqBtIB EeQxtmjQvJsz-ZkQ 36 Vi n ngôn ng h c, T II N i n Ti ng Vi t (Nxb Ơ N ng 2003) c ngoƠi 37 Adam Rigoni, The Chameleon’s Dish: Against The Dual Performance Hypothesis [2018] https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800446 38 Adam Rigoni, The Moral Impermissibility of Efficient Breach 39 Adam Smith, Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Digital Edition, MetaLibri Digital Library 2007) 40 Bell J, Boyron S and Whittaker S, Principles of French Law (Oxford University Press 2000) 41 Ben-Shahar O and Bar-Gill O, An Information Theory of Willful Breach (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 1479 42 Bridge MG, Contractual Damages for Intangible Loss: A Comparative Analysis (1984) 62 The Canadian Bar Review 323 43 Bryan A Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (8th edn, Thomson West 2004) 44 Bryan A Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (10th edn, Thomson West 2014) 45 Birmingham RL, Breach of Contract, Damage Measures, and Economic Efficiency (1970) 24 Rutgers Law Review 273 Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an vi 46 Caprice L Roberts, Restitutionary Disgorgement for Opportunistic Breach of Contract and Mitigation of Damages (2008) 42 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 131 47 Caslav Pejovic, Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal (2001) 32 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 817 48 Charles Fried, Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation (Oxford University Press 2015) 49 Clark A Remington, Intentional Interference with Contract and the Doctrine of Efficient Breach (1999) 47 Buffalo Law Review 645 50 D Friedmann, The Performance Interest in Contract Damages (1995) 111 LQR (Law Quarterly Review) 628 51 Daniel A Farbe, Reassessing the Economic Efficiency of Compensatory Damages for Breach of Contract (1980) 66 Virginia Law Review 1443 52 Daniel Markovits, Contract and Collaboration (2004) 113 The Yale Law Journal 1419 53 David Hume, Of the Obligation of Promise, A Treatise of Human Nature (Clarendon Press 1739) 54 David W Barnes, The Anatomy of Contract Damages and Efficient Breach of Theory (1998) Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 397 55 Dawinder S Sidhu, The Immorality and Inefficiency of an Efficient Breach (2006) The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, 61 56 Dori Kimel, From Promise to Contract: Towards a Liberal Theory of Contract (Hart 2003) 57 Douglas W Allen, Transaction Costs, The Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol (Edward Elgar 2000) 58 Driver J, The History of Utilitarianism in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn 2014) C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an vii 59 Duong Anh Son and Gian Thi Le Na, Efficient Breach of Contract (2020) 17 Journal of US-China Public Administration 147 60 E Allan Farnsworth, Changing Your Mind: The Law of Regretted Decisions (Yale University Press 1998) 61 Eisenberg MA, Actual and Virtual Specific Performance, the Theory of Efficient Breach, and the Indifference Principle in Contract Law (2005) 93 California Law Review 975 62 Eisenberg MA, The Disgorgement Interest in Contract Law (2006) Michigan Law Review 559 63 Ernest J Weinrib, Idea of Private Law - Oxford Scholarship (2012) 64 Finnis J, Natural Law and Natural Rights (OUP Oxford 2011) 65 Friedmann D, The Efficient Breach Fallacy (1989) 18 The Journal of Legal Studies 66 Fulle LL and Perdue WR, The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages:1 (1936) 46 The Yale Law Journal 52 67 Gaius, Gai Institutiones or Institutes of Roman Law by Gaius (Oxford Clarendon Press 1904) 68 Goetz CJ and Scott RE, Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach (1977) 77 Columbia Law Review 554 69 Goutal JL, Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the U S A (1976) 24 The American Journal of Comparative Law 43 70 Graves J, Penalty Clauses and the CISG (2012) 30 Journal of Law and Commerce 71 Gregory Klass, Efficient Breach, The philosophical foundations of contract law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014) Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an viii 72 Greig DW and Davis JLR, The Law of Contract (Law Book Company 1987) 73 Hans-Bernd Schafer and Claus Ott, The Economic Analysis of Civil Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2005) 74 Harder S, Measuring Damages in the Law of Obligations: The Search for Harmonised Principles (2010) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/50360/ 75 Henry Cheeseman, Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues (7th edn, Pearson Prentice Hall 2010) 76 Henry Mather, Contract Law and Morality (Greenwood Press 1999) 77 Hogg M, Promises and Contract Law: Comparative Perspectives (Illustrated edition, Cambridge University Press 2014) 78 Holmes OW, The Path of the Law (1997) 110 Harvard Law Review 991 79 James Penner, Promises, Agreements, and Contacts, Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law (Oxford University Press) 80 John O Honnold, Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention (3th edition, Kluwer Law International 2009) 81 John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Batoche Books 1859) 82 Kirchner C, The Difficult Reception of Law and Economics in Germany (1991) 11 International Review of Law and Economics 277 83 Kryla-Cudna K, Breach of Contract and Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss (2018) 26 European Review of Private Law 515 84 Lando H and Rose C, On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries (2004) 24 International Review of Law and Economics 473 85 Liam David Kilvington, Justifying the Application of the Theory of Efficient Breach Specifically within the Context of Commercial Contracting (University of York, York Law School 2018) 86 Liao W, The Application of the Theory of Efficient Breach in Contract Law: A Comparative Law and Economics Perspective (Cambridge Core, September 2015) 87 Linzer P, On the Amorality of Contract Remedies Efficiency, Equity, and the Second “Restatement” (1981) 81 Columbia Law Review 111 88 Macneil IR, Efficient Breach of Contract: Circles in the Sky (1982) 68 Virginia Law Review 947 89 Mathias Siems, Disgorgement of Profits for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Analysis (2005) Edinburgh Law Review 27 90 Palmer VV (ed), The Recovery of Non-Pecuniary Loss in European Contract Law, The Recovery of Non-Pecuniary Loss in European Contract Law (Cambridge University Press 2015) 91 Pontian Okoli, A Case for Reviewing the System of Remedies under CISG (2011) 22 International company and commercial law review 184 92 Qi Zhou, Is Seller’s Efficient Breach Possible under English Law SSRN Electronic Journal 93 Randy E Barnett, A Consent Theoiy of Contract (1986) 86 Columbia Law Review 269 94 Randy E Barnett, Contract Is Not Promise; Contract Is Consent, Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law (Oxford University Press 2014) 95 Richard Craswell, Contract Remedies, Renegotiation and the Theory of Efficient Breach (1988) 61 Southern California Law Review 629 96 Richard Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (3rd edition, Little, Brown and Company 1986) 97 Richard Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (7th edition, Aspen Publishers 2007) 98 Richard Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence (Harvard University Press 1990) Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an x 99 Richard Posner, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (1998) 111 Havard Law Review 1637 100 Robert Cooter and Thomas Ulen, Law and Economics (7th ed, New York: Addison-Wesley Longman 2011) 101 Ronald Coase, The Problem of Social Cost (1960) The Journal of Law & Economics 102 Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Belknap Press 1998) https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674518360 103 Scalise RJ, Why No “Efficient Breach” in the Civil Law?: A Comparative Assessment of the Doctrine of Efficient Breach of Contract (2007) 55 The American Journal of Comparative Law 721 104 Schwartz A and Scott RE, Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law (2003) 113 The Yale Law Journal 541 105 Seana Shiffrin, Could Breach of Contract Be Immoral? (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 155 106 Shavell S, Why Breach of Contract May Not Be Immoral Given the Incompleteness of Contracts (2009) 107 Michigan Law Review 1569 107 Solorzano J, An Uncertain Penalty: A Look at the International Community’s Inability to Harmonize the Law of Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses (2017) 15 Law and Business Review of the Americas 779 108 Stephen B Katz, The California Tort of Bad Faith Breach, the Dissent in Seaman’s v Standard Oil, and the Role of Punitive Damages in Contract Doctrine (1987) 60 Southern California Law Review 509 109 Steven Shavell, Is Breach of Contract Immoral? (2005) Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper 110 Steven Shavell, Specific Performance Versus Damages for Breach of Contract: An Economic Analysis (2005) 532 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper 111 Stolle DP and Slain AJ, Standard Form Contracts and Contract Schemas: A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Exculpatory Clauses Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an xi on Consumers’ Propensity to Sue (1997) 15 Behavioral Sciences & the Law 83 112 Tareq Al-Tawil, English Contract Law and the Efficient Breach Theory: Can They Co-Exist? (2015) 22 Maastricht journal of European and comparative law 396 113 Tareq Nail Al-Tawil, Promises, Contracts and Remedies: The Efficient Breach Theory versus Routine Specific Performance (The University of Manchester 2009) 114 Thomas J Loeb, Judicial Application of the Efficient Breach Theory - A Critical Examination (2017) 30 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 893 115 TM Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other ((Harvard University Press 2000) 116 Tomasz Famulski, Selected Legal Aspects of Transaction Costs (2017) Journal of Finance and Financial Law 117 UNCITRAL - Uniform Rules on Contract Clauses for an Agreed Sum Due upon Failure of Performance (1983) 118 Wacks R, Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (OUP Oxford 2006) 119 Wathne, K H H JB, Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions (2000) Journal of Marketing 36 120 Wilcox V, A Company’s Right to Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss (Cambridge University Press 2016) 121 Wilkinson-Ryan T, Do Liquidated Damages Encourage Breach? A Psychological Experiment (2010) 108 Michigan Law Review 633 122 Wilkinson-Ryan T, Legal Promise and Psychological Contract (2012) 47 Wake Forest L Rev 843 Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an xii 123 Wilkinson-Ryan T and Baron J, Moral Judgment and Moral Heuristics in Breach of Contract (2009) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 405 124 Williamson OE, The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach (1981) 87 American Journal of Sociology 548 C B N ÁN I Trong n c B n án 03/2018/KDTM-PT ngƠy 15/11/2018 v tranh ch p ph t vi 125 ph m h p đ ng mua bán hƠng hóa vƠ yêu c u b i th ng thi t h i - TAND T nh Hịa Bình B n án 14/2017/KDTM-ST ngày 25/07/2017 v tranh ch p h p 126 đ ng mua bán hàng hóa - TAND Qu n H i Chơu, Tp Ơ N ng B n án 15/2016/KDTM-G T ngƠy 07/09/2016 v tranh ch p h p 127 đ ng xơy d ng, H i đ ng th m phán TAND T i cao B n án 22/2019-DS-PT ngƠy 06/03/2019 v tranh ch p h p đ ng 128 xơy d ng - Tòa án nhơn dơn t nh Lơm ng B n án s : 56/2019/KDTM-ST ngày 12/6/2019 v tranh ch p h p 129 đ ng mua bán hàng hóa - TAND Qu n 1, Tp HCM II N c ngoƠi 130 Attorney General v Blake and Another [2000] UKHL 45 | Practical Law 131 BGH, 10052006 - XII ZR 124/02 [2006] BGH XII ZR 124/02 132 Diesen v Samson 1971 SLT 49 (Sh Ct) 133 Farley v Skinner [2001] UKHL 49 134 Groves v John Wunder Co., 205 Minn 163 135 Hamlin v Great Northern Railway Co (1856), H & N 408, 156 E.R 1261 136 Hobbs v London and South Western Rly Co (1875) LR 10 QB 111 137 Kutzin v Pirnie, 124 N.J 500 Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an xiii 138 Lake River Corp v Carborundum Co., 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir 1985) 139 LL Cole & Son, Inc v Hickman 282 Ark (Ark 1984) (1984) 140 Mc Neil v Forest Lawn Memorial Services Ltd (1976) 72 D L R (3d) 556 (Canada) 141 Patton v Mid-Continent Systems, Inc., 841 F.2d 742 142 Peevyhouse v Garland Coal & Mining Company, 382 P.2d 109 ậ CourtListener.Com’ (CourtListener, 1962) 143 Ross v Forest Lawn Memorial Park (1984) [Civ No B001209 Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Five March 8, 1984.] 144 Shore Investments, Inc v Bhole, Inc., et al 2011 WL 5967253 (Del.Super Nov 28, 2011) 145 Sullivan v O’Connor - 363 Mass 579, 296 NE2d 183 (1973) Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn C.33.44.55.54.78.65.5.43.22.2.4 22.Tai lieu Luan 66.55.77.99 van Luan an.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.33.44.55.54.78.655.43.22.2.4.55.22 Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an.Tai lieu Luan van Luan an Do an Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd 77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.77.99.44.45.67.22.55.77.C.37.99.44.45.67.22.55.77t@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn