Structuralanalysisofthejacalin-relatedlectin MornigaM
from theblackmulberry(Morusnigra)incomplex with
mannose
Anja Rabijns
1
, Annick Barre
2
, Els J. M. Van Damme
3
, Willy J. Peumans
3
, Camiel J. De Ranter
1
and Pierre Rouge
´
2
1 Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Medicinal Physicochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, K. U. Leuven, Belgium
2 Surfaces Cellulaires et Signalisation chez les Ve
´
ge
´
taux, UMR-CNRS 5546, Po
ˆ
le de Biotechnologie ve
´
ge
´
tale, Castanet-Tolosan, France
3 Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Belgium
During the last decade numerous lectins that are struc-
turally related to jacalin, the Gal ⁄ GalNAc-specific lec-
tin from jackfruit (Artocarpus integrifolia) seeds [1],
have been isolated and characterized from plants
belonging to taxonomically distant families [2–13]. At
present, jacalin-related lectins are subdivided on the
basis of their apparent monosaccharide-binding speci-
ficity in Gal-specific (gJRL) and Man-specific jacalin-
related lectins (mJRL). Hitherto, gJRL have been
identified in only a few species ofthe family Moraceae
such as Osage orange (Maclura pomifera) (MPA), jack
fruit (Artocarpus integrefolia) (jacalin) and a few other
Artocarpus species, and inblackmulberry (Morus
nigra) (MornigaG). In contrast to the gJRL, mJRL are
not confined to the Moraceae family but are wide-
spread among plants as is illustrated by the isolation
and characterization of such lectins from jack fruit
(artocarpin) and mulberry (MornigaM), banana (Musa
acuminata; Musaceae), hedge bindweed (Calystegia
sepium; Convolvulaceae), bindweed (Convolvulus arven-
sis; Convolvulaceae), Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus
tuberosus; Asteraceae), Parkia platycephala (Fabaceae:
Mimosoideae subfamily), Japanese chestnut (Castanea
crenata; Fagaceae), rice (Oryza sativa; Poaceae) and
Keywords
carbohydrate-binding site; jacalin-related
lectin; mannose; Morus nigra; quaternary
association
Correspondence
P. Rouge
´
, Surfaces Cellulaires et
Signalisation chez les Ve
´
ge
´
taux, UMR-CNRS
5546, Po
ˆ
le de Biotechnologie ve
´
ge
´
tale, 24
Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31326 Castanet-
Tolosan, France
Fax: +33 05 62 19 35 02
E-mail: rouge@scsv.ups-tlse.fr
(Received 22 March 2005, revised 25 April
2005, accepted 31 May 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04801.x
The structures ofMornigaM and the MornigaM–mannose complex have
been determined at 1.8 A
˚
and 2.0 A
˚
resolution, respectively. Both struc-
tures adopt the typical b-prism motif found in other jacalin-related lectins
and their tetrameric assembly closely resembles that of jacalin. The carbo-
hydrate-binding cavity ofMornigaM readily binds mannose. No major
structural rearrangements can be observed inMornigaM upon binding of
mannose. These results allow corroboration ofthe structure–function rela-
tionships within the small group of Moraceae lectins.
Abbreviations
BanLec, banana (Musa acuminata) lectin; Calsepa, Calystegia sepium (hedge bindweed) agglutinin; Conarva, Convolvulus arvensis
(bindweed) agglutinin; Heltuba, Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke) agglutinin; JRL, jacalin-related lectin; gJRL, galactose-specific
jacalin-related lectin; mJRL, mannose-specific jacalin-related lectin; MPA, Maclura pomifera (Osage orange) agglutinin; MornigaG, Gal-specific
Morus nigra (black mulberry) agglutinin; MornigaM, Man-specific Morus nigra (black mulberry) agglutinin; Orysata, rice (Oryza sativa)
agglutinin.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS 3725
the true fern Phlebodium aureum (Polypodiaceae). The
subdivision in gJRL and mJRL was initially proposed
on the basis ofthe nominal specificity towards mono-
saccharides but is also in perfect agreement with a
classification ofthe JRL according to the overall struc-
ture of their corresponding genes. More recent specific-
ity studies indicated that at least within the family
Moraceae the differences in specificity are not so a
clear-cut. It has been demonstrated, indeed, that the
presumed T-antigen ⁄ GalNac-specific jacalin behaves as
a polyspecific lectin capable of interacting ) albeit with
a (much) lower affinity ) with many other sugars
including Man, Gluc, Neu5Ac or MurNAc [14,15]. In
this respect, the mJRL isolated from other plants
families such as, e.g. Calsepa from Calystegia sepium
(Convolvulaceae) and Heltuba from Helianthus tubero-
sus (Asteraceae), which exhibit an exclusive specificity
towards mannose and do not interact with unrelated
sugars like Gal or GalNAc [7,16] differ from jacalin.
However, these available data on the specificity of JRL
offer no explanation for the dramatic differences in the
agglutination activity between the mJRL of different
origin. All mJRL studied thus far are very weak agglu-
tinins as compared to the gJRL (more than three
orders of magnitude less potent) except MornigaM
which is nearly as potent as jacalin. Because one can
reasonably assume that the exceptionally high agglu-
tinating activity ofMornigaM is intimately linked to
its sugar binding properties the three-dimensional
structure ofMornigaMincomplexwith a simple sugar
was determined to decipher thestructural features
responsible for the unusual enhanced activity of this
Moraceae lectin.
Results
Quality and overall view ofthe structure
The final model obtained for uncomplexed MornigaM
converged to an R-factor of 19.0% and an R-free
value of 21.0% (Table 1). It comprises four MornigaM
subunits with 154 out ofthe total 161 amino acid resi-
dues, 575 water molecules, three acetate molecules,
four glycerol molecules and one sulfate molecule. The
first seven N-terminal residues are not seen inthe elec-
tron density map and are not included inthe model.
The model has a good geometry and has r.m.s. devia-
tions from ideal bond lengths and angles of 0.005 A
˚
and 1.45°, respectively. All residues were found in the
most favoured (85.7%) and generously allowed regions
(14.3%) ofthe Ramachandran plot. None ofthe resi-
dues was found inthe disallowed regions. The average
temperature factor for the main-chain and side-chain
atoms are 17.6 A
˚
2
and 19.9 A
˚
2
, respectively. In total
12 cis-peptide bonds were found inthe structure (three
per monomer: Leu21, Pro85 and Pro123). Further
refinement statistics are given in Table 1 for both the
uncomplexed and Man-complexed MornigaM.
The MornigaM protomer exhibits the b-prism fold
typically found inthe JRL family (Fig. 1). It consists
of three four-stranded b-sheets forming three Greek
keys motifs: 1 (b1,b2,b11,b12), 2 (b3, b4, b5,b6) and
3(b7,b8,b9b10) (Fig. 2A,B). Although the single-chain
MornigaM protomer definitely differs from jacalin by
the lack of a proteolytic cleavage of its protomer into
an a and a b chain, it nicely superimposes on the simi-
larly folded two-chain jacalin protomer and other
single-chain Man-specific protomers of Heltuba or
artocarpin.
MornigaM adopts a homotetrameric quaternary
arrangement very similar to that of many other JRL
like jacalin [1], MPA [17] and artocarpin [18]
(Fig. 2C,D). All four monomers within the tetramer
superimpose well with r.m.s. differences ranging
between 0.20 A
˚
and 0.47 A
˚
. The largest structural dif-
ference observed between the four protomers is the
different conformation of loop 99–107 (L2) inthe A
protomer as compared to its conformation inthe B, C
and D protomers ofthe tetramer. This loop forms
the roof ofthe sugar binding pocket of MornigaM
and hence its different orientation might be related
to the observed lack of binding ofmannoseinthe A
Table 1. Crystallographic data for MornigaM and the MornigaM–
Man complex.
Parameter MornigaM
MornigaM–
Man complex
Data collection:
Space group P65 P65
Used wavelength (A
˚
) 0.912 0.910
Used beam line X11 X11
Resolution limit (A
˚
) 1.8 (1.83–1.80) 2.0 (2.03–2.00)
Total observations 250868 211071
Unique reflections 100939 (5072) 74409 (3763)
Completeness of all data (%) 98.4 (99.7) 99.1 (100.0)
Completeness of
data (%) (I >2r)
90.6 (70.4) 89.8 (71.7)
Mean I ⁄ r 20.8 (5.0) 21.3 (4.9)
R
sym
value (%) 4.2 (16.0) 4.5 (18.9)
Refinement:
R-work (%) 19.0 19.1
R-free (%) 21.0 21.0
Atoms in protein ⁄ solvent 4640 ⁄ 616 4640 ⁄ 583
Mean B in protein ⁄ solvent (A
˚
2
) 18.7 ⁄ 27.6 20.4 ⁄ 29.0
r.m.s.d. bond lengths (A
˚
) 0.005 0.005
r.m.s.d. bond angles (°) 1.45 1.42
Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose A. Rabijns et al.
3726 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS
protomer (see below). Furthermore, a minor structural
heterogeneity can be observed inthe N-terminal region
of the different protomers. Like jacalin, the MornigaM
homotetramer exhibits a strong electronegative surface
(Fig. 2E,F). The carbohydrate-binding cavities are
electronegatively charged due to the Asp153 residue
that occupies the centre ofthe cavity.
The carbohydrate-binding site
Comparison ofthe backbone atoms ofthe uncom-
plexed and Man-complexed MornigaM structures
shows that no significant structural rearrangements
occur upon mannose binding. The r.m.s. deviation
between both structures is only 0.11 A
˚
, based on the
superposition ofthe Ca atoms. Except for protomer
A, a clear density is seen for the bound mannose mole-
cule inthe carbohydrate-binding site of protomers B,
C and D which is composed of three convergent loops
connecting strands b1tob1 (loop 1), b7tob8 (loop 2)
and b11 to b12 (loop 3), located at the top ofthe pro-
tomers (Fig. 3A). Man is specifically anchored to resi-
dues Gly27 (loop 1), Phe150-Val151-Asp153 (loop 3)
by a network of 8 hydrogen bonds (Table 2) with oxy-
gens O3, O4, O5 and O6, respectively (Fig. 3B).
Depending on the protomer, Gly27N interacts (pro-
tomers C and D) or does not interact (protomer B)
with O4 of Man. An additional stacking between the
aromatic ring of Phe150 and the pyranose ring of Man
reinforces the interaction ofMornigaMwiththe sugar.
A very similar H-bond network was observed in the
previously X-ray solved MeMan–artocarpin [18] and
Man–Heltuba [19] complexes. Superposing the Ca of
the amino acid residues forming the monosaccharide-
binding site ofMornigaMwith those of Heltuba and
artocarpin yielded r.m.s. values of 0.263 A
˚
and
0.142 A
˚
, respectively, thus indicating that all these resi-
dues occupy very similar positions in all the mJRL. In
fact, rather close r.m.s. of 0.432 A
˚
and 0.362 A
˚
were
measured withthe corresponding amino acid residues
forming the Gal ⁄ GalNAc-binding site of jacalin (PDB
code 1JAC) and MPA (PDB code 1JOT), suggesting a
similar topology for the monosaccharide-binding site
of the gJRL that apparently accounts for the promis-
cuous character of this gJRL.
The size and shape ofthe carbohydrate-binding site
of MornigaM and other JRL essentially depends on
both the conformation ofthe three loops that delineate
the binding cavity and the presence therein of amino
acid residues with bulky side chains. The carbohy-
drate-binding cavity ofMornigaM is largely widened
between loops 2 and 3 but its opening on the other
side, between loops 1 and 2, is strongly restricted by
the side chain of Lys106 which protrudes from loop 2
to close up the cavity. These structural discrepancies
of the carbohydrate-binding cavity should have a pro-
found influence on the type of oligosaccharides that fit
in the site ofthe JRL.
Discussion
Resolution ofthe three-dimensional structure of apo
MornigM X-ray at 1.8 A
˚
revealed a homotetrameric
organization similar to those found for jacalin and all
Moraceae JRL studied thus far but not for any other
JRL. Resolution ofthe structure of a MornigaM ⁄ Man
Fig. 1. Sequence and structure comparison ofMornigaM to other jacalin-related lectins. (A) Sequence alignment ofMornigaMwith jacalin as
a member ofthe gJRL group and Heltuba and artocarpin as members ofthe mJRL group. Identical residues are coloured white with a black
background and similar residues are coloured black and open boxed. The amino acid residues forming the monosaccharide-binding site are
indicated by stars. b-Strands forming the Greek keys 1 (b1,b2,b11,b12), 2 (b3-b6) and 3 (b7-b10) of jacalin (upper arrows) and MornigaM
(lower arrows) protomers are indicated.
A. Rabijns et al. Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS 3727
complex at 2.0 A
˚
further demonstrated that a network
of seven or eight hydrogen bonds anchors O3, O4, O5
and O6 of Man to residues Gly27, Phe150, Val151 and
Asp153 (all of which protrude from loops 1 and 2 that
delineate the carbohydrate-binding cavity ofthe lectin
protomer). A closer examination ofthe structure of
the binding sites indicates that specificity ofthe Mora-
ceae lectins is primarily determined by the orientation
of the side chains ofthe four amino acid residues resi-
dues that form the monosaccharide-binding site of the
lectins. An r.m.s. of only 0.2–0.4 A
˚
was measured
when superimposing the Ca of these four residues
from different Moraceae JRL, which implies that there
is very little structural tolerance at the level of their
respective monosaccharide-binding sites. This holds
true particularly for the Gly residue, which is either
free at the N-terminus ofthe large polypeptide of the
two-chain gJRL (in casu jacalin, MPA and MornigaG)
or located around position 10–20 inthe uncleaved pro-
tomer ofthe mJRL (in casu MornigaM and artocar-
pin). Due to this strictly conserved orientation the Gly
residue of both types of Moraceae JRL can interact
with both the equatorial (Gal ⁄ GalNAc) and axial
(Man ⁄ Glc) O4 of monosaccharides. It should be
emphasized, however, that in spite of this particular
structural feature jacalin exhibits a preferential specific-
ity for Gal, GalNAc and the T antigen, and binds
other sugars with a much lower affinity.
As with most other plant lectins the reactivity of
MornigaM and other JRL is not limited to simple
sugars but also extends to disaccharides and more
complex oligosaccharides [20–22]. Structural analyses
indicated that the carbohydrate-binding cavity of
MornigaM is sufficiently extended to accommodate
more bulky saccharides and that the atomic structure
of this cavity accounts for the oligosaccharide-bind-
ing specificity of each of these lectins. It is worth
mentioning in this context that loop 2, which forms
the roof ofthe carbohydrate-binding cavity in all the
N
N
β5
β4
β2
β12
β11
β8
β3
β6
β9
β7
β10
β1
AB
CD
EF
Fig. 2. Structure and surface analysisofMornigaM and jacalin. (A,
B) Ribbon diagrams showing the arrangement ofthe 12 b-strands
of theMornigaM protomer in three Greek keys 1, 2 and 3 coloured
orange (strands b1, b2, b11, b12), blue (strands b3-b6) and pink
(strands b7-b10), respectively. N and C indicate the N- and C-ter-
mini oftheMornigaM polypeptide, respectively, and the stars indi-
cate the location ofthe monosaccharide-binding site. (C, D)
Tetrameric arrangement ofthe protomers ofMornigaM (C) and jac-
alin (D). The b-chains ofthe jacalin protomers are coloured cyan.
The carbohydrate-binding sites are indicated by stars. (E, F) Mole-
cular surface oftheMornigaM (E) and jacalin (F) tetramers showing
the distribution ofthe electrostatic potentials. The negative poten-
tial is coloured red and displayed at )5 kT level, the positive poten-
tial is colored blue and displayed at +5 kT level (1 kT ¼ 0.6 kcals).
Neutral surfaces are white. The electrostatic potentials were calcu-
lated and displayed with
GRASP [37].
AB
Fig. 3. The carbohydrate-binding site ofMornigaM and other jac-
alin-related lectins. (A) Ribbon diagram ofthe carbohydrate-binding
site ofMornigaM showing the three loops L1 (grey), L2 (pale grey)
and L3 (mid grey) forming the carbohydrate-binding cavity. Man-
nose (in grey ball-and-sticks) occupies the monosaccharide-binding
site. (B) Network of hydrogen bonds (dashes) anchoring Man to
the amino acid residues ofthe monosaccharide-binding site of
MornigaM.
Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose A. Rabijns et al.
3728 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS
Moraceae JRL plays a key role inthe delineation of
the size and shape ofthe binding site. The presence
in loop 2 of bulky amino acid residues has appar-
ently no effect on the accessibility of monosaccha-
rides but could dramatically reduce the accessibility
of the carbohydrate-binding cavity for oligosaccha-
rides. This observation is in good agreement with
the recent suggestion (based on a database analysis
of jacalin-like lectins) that loop 2 is a very important
structural feature in determining the oligosaccharide-
binding specificity of JRL [23].
Experimental procedures
Isolation ofthe lectin
MornigaM was isolated frommulberry(Morusnigra) bark
by affinity chromatography on Man-Sepharose 4B, as pre-
viously described [11]. Three successive rounds of affinity
chromatography were performed to ensure the purity of the
Man-specific lectin. Thelectin preparation gave a single
protein band when checked by SDS ⁄ PAGE.
Crystallization and structure resolution
Crystals suitable for diffraction analysis were grown from a
55% saturated ammonium sulfate solution containing 0.1 m
imidazole buffer pH 7.0 as described elsewhere [24]. Subse-
quently, crystals ofthecomplex between MornigaM and
Man were prepared by soaking an uncomplexed MornigaM
crystal with a 50 mm Man solution for approximately 48 h.
Both the uncomplexed and complexed crystals could be
cryoprotected by soaking the crystals inthe original crystal-
lization condition with 25% glycerol for 30 s. Soaking
experiments performed under similar conditions with Gal
remained unsuccessful.
Data collection with cryo-cooling at 100 K was carried
out on the native and soaked crystals at the X11 beam line
of the DESY synchrotron in Hamburg. All data processing
was done using denzo and scalepack [25]. The space
group was assigned to be P6
5
with a ¼ b ¼ 110.7, c ¼
159.2 A
˚
. Checking ofthe diffraction data at the twin server
[26] showed that all measured crystals were partially mero-
hedrally twinned with variable twin fractions ranging from
11% to 35%. The twin fractions for the data sets used
for final structure determination ofMornigaM and of
MornigaM–Man were 14.5% and 18.7%, respectively. Both
data sets were detwinned using the algorithm described by
Yeates [26], yielding data sets in which all reflections had
their twin component removed. Data collection statistics
for both data sets are given in Table 1.
The phase problem for theMornigaM structure was
solved by the molecular replacement technique in x-plor
[27] using the detwinned data. The coordinates of half a
jacalin molecule (chains A and C, PDB code 1JAC) were
used as a search model for the uncomplexed MornigaM
structure. Two dimers were easily found and combining
them into a tetramer gave an R factor of 46% (R-free
47%) after initial rigid body refinement to 3 A
˚
. Based on a
calculated Matthews coefficient of 2.35 A
˚
3
ÆDa
)1
[28], it was
assumed that the asymmetric unit consisted of eight mono-
mers. However, inthe molecular replacement search only a
single tetramer was found. The corresponding solvent con-
tent for the crystals is 73%.
Refinement was performed by the cns package [29] using
torsional angle dynamics and individual B-factor refine-
ment. A randomly selected 10% ofthe data sets were set
aside for cross-validation using the R-free value. Bulk sol-
vent correction was used. Solvent molecules were progres-
sively added when they met the following requirements: (a)
a minimum 3 r peak had to be present inthe |F
obs
|-|F
calc
|
difference map; (b) a peak had to be visible inthe 2|F
obs
|-
|F
calc
| map; (c) during refinement the B-value for the water
molecule should not exceed 60 A
˚
2
; and (d) the water mole-
cule had to be stabilized by hydrogen bonding. Refinement
was always performed against detwinned data; different
twin fractions were tested and used to optimize the refine-
ment. Eventually twin fractions of 11.60% and 14.74%
Table 2. List of hydrogen bonds connecting themannose to the different residues oftheMornigaM tetramer.
Mannose A B C D
O1 – – H
2
O21: 2.84 A
˚
H
2
O572: 2.67 A
˚
O2 – – – –
O3 – Gly27N: 3.17 A
˚
Gly27N: 2.84 A
˚
Gly27N: 2.85 A
˚
O3 – – H
2
O475: 2.76 A
˚
–
O4 – H
2
O257: 2.57 A
˚
H
2
O174: 2.57 A
˚
H
2
O325 : 2.55 A
˚
O4 – Asp153Od1: 2.47 A
˚
Asp153Od1: 2.58 A
˚
Asp153Od1: 2.51 A
˚
O5 – Phe150N: 3.00 A
˚
Phe150N:3.06 A
˚
Phe150N: 2.99 A
˚
O6 – Asp153Od2: 2.57 A
˚
Asp153Od2 : 2.70 A
˚
Asp153Od2: 2.72 A
˚
O6 – Val151O: 3.14 A
˚
Val151O:3.19 A
˚
Val151O: 3.19 A
˚
O6 – Val151N: 3.05 A
˚
Val151N:3.11 A
˚
Val151N: 2.97 A
˚
O6 – Phe150N: 2.90 A
˚
Phe150N:2.90 A
˚
Phe150N:2.79 A
˚
A. Rabijns et al. Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS 3729
gave the best result for theMornigaM and the MornigaM–
Man structure refinement, respectively. Visual inspection
and model building were done in O [30]. Electron and dif-
ference density maps were used to confirm the presence of
the mannose molecule inthe structure ofthe MornigaM–
Man complex. To accurately fit the electron density map
several amino acids in primary sequence deposited in the
SWISS-PROT database (accession number Q8LGR3) had
to be changed. These changes include V17I, P100A and
V157F. The observed differences are probably due to the
(documented) heterogeneity of MornigaM. The presence of
the replaced amino acid residues, the water molecules and
the ions were all checked in simulated annealing omit maps.
Assessment ofthe quality ofthe coordinates was done with
the programs procheck [31] and moleman [32]. The
coordinates and structure factors oftheMornigaM and
the MornigaM–Man structure have been deposited in the
Protein Data Bank [33] withthe codes 1XXQ and 1XXR,
respectively. Ribbon diagrams ofMornigaM and other
JRL were drawn with molscript [34] and rendered with
bobscript [35] and raster3d [36].
Molecular surface analysis
Molecular surface and electrostatic potentials were calcula-
ted and displayed with grasp using the parse3 parameters
[37]. The solvent probe radius used for molecular surfaces
was 1.4 A
˚
and a standard 2.0 A
˚
Stern layer was used to
exclude ions fromthe molecular surface [38]. The inner and
outer dielectric constants applied to the protein and the sol-
vent were, respectively, fixed at 4.0 and 80.0, and the cal-
culations were performed keeping a salt concentration of
0.145 m. No even distribution ofthe net negative charge of
the carboxylic group of negatively charged residues was
performed between their two oxygen atoms prior to the cal-
culations. Surface topology ofthe carbohydrate-binding
sites was rendered and analysed with pymol (W.L. DeLano,
http://www.pymol.org).
Sequence comparison and alignment
The program espript [39] was used to compare the amino
acid sequence ofMornigaM to other JRL sequences
(Fig. 1A). Multiple amino acid sequence alignments were
based on clustal x [40].
Acknowledgements
A.R. is a Postdoctoral Research Fellows ofthe Fund
for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium). The finan-
cial support of CNRS is gratefully acknowledged (A.B.
and P.R.). We thank the beam line scientists at DESY
for technical support and the European Union for sup-
port ofthe work at EMBL Hamburg through the
HCMP to Large Installations Project, contract no.
CHGE-CT93-0040.
References
1 Sankaranarayanan R, Sekar K, Banerjee R, Sharma V,
Surolia A & Vijayan M (1996) A novel mode of carbo-
hydrate recognition in jacalin, a Moraceae plant lectin
with a b-prism fold. Nat Struct Biol 3, 596–603.
2 Bausch JN & Poretz RD (1977) Purification and proper-
ties ofthe hemagglutinin from Maclura pomifera seeds.
Biochemistry 16, 5790–5794.
3 Moreira RA & Ainouz IL (1981) Lectins from seeds of
jack fruit (Artocarpus integrifolia L.): isolation and puri-
fication of two isolectins fromthe albumin fraction. Biol
Plant (Praha) 23, 186–192.
4 Van Damme EJM, Barre A, Verhaert P, Rouge
´
P&
Peumans WJ (1996) Molecular cloning ofthe mitogenic
mannose ⁄ maltose-specific rhizome lectinfrom Calyste-
gia sepium. FEBS Lett 397, 352–356.
5 Peumans WJ, Zhang W, Barre A, Houles-Astoul C,
Balint-Kurti P, Rovira P, Rouge
´
P, May GD, Van
Leuven F, Truffa-Bachi P & Van Damme EJM (2000)
Fruit-specific lectins from banana and plantain. Planta
211, 546–554.
6 Geshi N & Brandt A (1998) Two jasmonate-inducible
myrosinase-binding proteins from Brassica napus L.
seedlings with homology to jacalin. Planta 204, 295–304.
7 Van Damme EJM, Barre A, Mazard A-M, Verhaert P,
Horman A, Debray H, Rouge
´
P & Peumans WJ (1999)
Characterization and molecular cloning ofthe lectin
from Helianthus tuberosus. Eur J Biochem 259, 135–142.
8 Zhang W, Peumans WJ, Barre A, Houles-Astoul C,
Rovira P, Rouge
´
P, Proost P, Truffa-Bachi P, Jalali HA
& Van Damme EJM (2000) Isolation and characteri-
zation of a jacalin-related mannose-binding lectin from
salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) Plants Planta 210, 970–
978.
9 Nomura K, Nakamura S, Fujitake M & Nakanishi T
(2000) Complete amino acid sequence of Japanese chest-
nut agglutinin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 276, 23–
28.
10 Mann K, Farias CMSA, Gallego Del Sol F, Santos CF,
Grangeiro TB, Nagano CS, Cavada BS & Calvete JJ
(2001) The amino-acid sequence ofthe glucose ⁄ man-
nose-specific lectin isolated from Parkia platycephala
seeds reveals three tandemly arranged jacalin-related
domains. Eur J Biochem 268, 4414–4422.
11 Van Damme EJM, Hu J, Barre A, Houle
`
s-Astoul C,
Rouge
´
P, Proost P & Peumans WJ (2002) Two distinct
jacalin-related lectins with a different specificity and
subcellular location are major vegetative storage pro-
teins inthe bark ofthemulberry tree. Plant Physiol
130, 757–769.
Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose A. Rabijns et al.
3730 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS
12 Yagi F, Iwaya T, Haraguchi T & Goldstein IJ (2002)
The lectinfrom leaves of Japanese cycad, Cycas revoluta
Thunb. (gymnosperm) is a member ofthe jacalin-related
family. Eur J Biochem 269 , 4335–4341.
13 Tateno H, Winter HC, Petryniak J & Goldstein IJ (2003)
Purification, characterization, molecular cloning, and
expression of novel members ofjacalin-related lectins
from rhizomes ofthe true fern Phlebodium aureum (L)
J Smith (Polypodiaceae). J Biol Chem 278, 10891–10899.
14 Bourne Y, Houle
`
s Astoul C, Zamboni V, Peumans WJ,
Menu-Bouaouiche L, Van Damme EJM, Barre A &
Rouge
´
P (2002) Structural basis for the unusual carbo-
hydrate-binding specificity of jacalin towards galactose
and mannose. Biochem J 364, 173–179.
15 Jeyaprakash AA, Jayashree G, Mahanta SK, Swami-
nathan CP, Sekar K, Surolia A & Vijayan M (2005)
Structural basis for the energetics of jacalin–sugar
interactions: promiscuity versus specificity. J Mol Biol
347, 181–188.
16 Peumans WJ, Winter HC, Bemer V, Van Leuven F,
Goldstein IJ, Truffa-Bachi P & Van Damme EJM
(1997) Isolation of a novel plant lectinwith an unusual
specificity from Calystegia sepium. Glycoconjugate J 14,
259–265.
17 Lee X, Thompson A, Zhang Z, Ton-That H, Biester-
feldt J, Ogata C, Xu L, Johnston AZ & Young NM
(1998) Structure ofthecomplexof Maclura pomifera
agglutinin and the T-antigen disaccharide, Galb1,3Gal-
NAc. J Biol Chem 273, 6312–6318.
18 Pratap JV, Arockia Jeyaprakash A, Geetha Rani P, Se-
kar K, Surolia A & Vijayan M (2002) Crystal structures
of artocarpin, a Moraceae lectinwithmannose specifi-
city, and its complexwith methyl-a-d-mannose: implica-
tions to the generation of carbohydrate specificity.
J Mol Biol 317, 237–247.
19 Bourne Y, Zamboni V, Barre A, Peumans WJ, Van
Damme EJM & Rouge
´
P (1999) Helianthus tuberosus
lectin, the crystal structure reveals a widespread scaffold
for mannose-binding lectins. Structure Fold Des 7,
1473–1482.
20 Rani PG, Bachhawat K, Misquith S & Surolia A (1999)
Thermodynamic studies of saccharide binding to arto-
carpin, a B-cell mitogen, reveals the extended nature of
its interaction with mannotriose [3,6-Di-O-(a-d-manno-
pyranosyl)-d-mannose]. J Biol Chem 274, 29694–29698.
21 Rani PG, Bachhawat K, Reddy GB, Oscarson S &
Surolia A (2000) Isothermal titration calorimetric
studies on the binding of deoxytrimannose derivatives
with artocarpin: implications for a deep-seated
combining site in lectins. Biochemistry 39, 10755–
10760.
22 Wu AM, Wu JH, Singh T, Chu K-C, Peumans WJ,
Rouge
´
P & Van Damme EJM (2004) A novel lectin
(MornigaM) frommulberry(Morusnigra) bark recog-
nizes oligomannosyl residues N-glycans. J Biomed Sci
11, 874–885.
23 Raval S, Gowda SB, Singh DD & Chandra NR (2004)
A database analysisof ¢jacalin-like¢ lectins: sequence-
structure-function relationships. Glycobiology 14, 1247–
1263.
24 Rabijns A, Verboven C, Novoa de Armas H, Van
Damme EJM, Peumans WJ & De Ranter CJ (2001) The
crystals of a mannose-specific jacalin-relatedlectin from
Morus nigra are merohedrally twinned. Acta Crystallogr
D57, 609–611.
25 Otwinowski Z & Minor W (1997) Processing of x-ray
diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods
Enzymol 276, 307–326.
26 Yeates TO (1997) Detecting and overcoming crystal
twinning. Methods Enzymol 276, 344–358.
27 Bru
¨
nger AT (1992) X-PLOR, Version 3.1. A Systemn
for X-Ray Crystallography and. NMR. Yale University
Press, New Haven, CT.
28 Matthews BW (1974) Determination of molecular
weight from protein crystals. J Mol Biol 82, 513–526.
29 Bru
¨
nger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, Delano WL, Gros
P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges
M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T &
Warren GL (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: a
new software suite for macromolecular structure deter-
mination. Acta Crystallogr D54, 905–921.
30 Jones TA, Zhou JY, Cowtan S & Kjelgaard M (1991)
Improved methods for building protein models in elec-
tron density maps and the location of errors in these
models. Acta Crystallogr A47, 110–119.
31 Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS & Thornton
JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereo-
chemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystal-
logr 26, 283–291.
32 Kleywegt GJ & Jones TA (1997) Model building and
refinement practice. Methods Enzymol 277, 208–230.
33 Bernstein FC, Koetzel TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF,
Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T &
Tasumi M (1977) The protein data bank: a computer
based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol
Biol 112, 535–542.
34 Kraulis PJ (1991) MolScript: a program to produce
both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures.
J Appl Crystallogr 24, 946–950.
35 Esnouf RM (1997) An extensively modified version of
Molscript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capa-
bilities. J Mol Graphics 15 , 132–134.
36 Merrit EA & Bacon DJ (1997) Raster3D photorealistic
molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 277, 505–524.
37 Nicholls A, Sharp KA & Honig B (1991) Protein fold-
ing and association: Insights fromthe interfacial and
thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins
Struc Func Genet 11, 281–296.
A. Rabijns et al. Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS 3731
38 Gilson MK & Honing BH (1987) Calculation of electro-
static potential in an enzyme active site. Nature 330, 84–
86.
39 Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI & Metoz F (1999)
ESPript: analysisof multiple sequence alignments in
PostScript. Bioinformatics 15 , 305–308.
40 Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F
& Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL–X windows inter-
face: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment
aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res 15,
4876–4882.
Structure of a jacalin-relatedlectin complexed to mannose A. Rabijns et al.
3732 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 3725–3732 ª 2005 FEBS
. 2 that delineate the carbohydrate-binding cavity of the lectin protomer). A closer examination of the structure of the binding sites indicates that specificity of the Mora- ceae lectins is primarily. Structural analysis of the jacalin-related lectin MornigaM from the black mulberry (Morus nigra) in complex with mannose Anja Rabijns 1 , Annick Barre 2 ,. protomers of the tetramer. This loop forms the roof of the sugar binding pocket of MornigaM and hence its different orientation might be related to the observed lack of binding of mannose in the A Table