CollagenousAlzheimeramyloidplaque component
assembles amyloidfibrilsintoprotease resistant
aggregates
Linda So
¨
derberg
1,
*, Camilla Dahlqvist
1,
*, Hiroyoshi Kakuyama
1
, Johan Thyberg
2
, Akira Ito
3
,
Bengt Winblad
1
, Jan Na
¨
slund
1
and Lars O. Tjernberg
1
1 Karolinska Institutet and Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Alzheimer Center (KASPAC), Neurotec, Novum, Huddinge, Sweden
2 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Research Center, Osaka, Japan
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid
deposits of the amyloid b-peptide (Ab) in brain [1]. Ab
is a 40–42 amino acid peptide that is proteolytically
derived from the b-amyloid precursor protein (APP).
The longer Ab42 variant aggregates more rapidly than
the more abundant Ab40 [2] and is the species deposited
initially in the brain in AD and Down’s syndrome [3].
Several lines of evidence suggest that APP processing
and Ab levels have a central role in the pathogenesis of
AD. The APP gene is located on chromosome 21 (which
is present in triplicate in Down’s syndrome), providing
an explanation for the elevated levels of APP and Ab,
as well as for the AD-like pathology, observed in
Down’s syndrome. Moreover, mutations in genes linked
to familiar early onset AD generally result in altered
APP processing and an increased Ab42 ⁄ Ab40 ratio [4].
It is not known how the amyloid plaques are formed.
In vitro studies indicate that unstructured Ab mono-
mers spontaneously form soluble oligomers (seeds),
which, in turn, form protofibrils and mature fibrils.
Other molecules could be of importance for the poly-
merization process in vivo, including apolipoproteins E
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; amyloid; CLAC; fibrils;
thioflavin T
Correspondence
C. Dahlqvist, Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec,
Novum KASPAC pl. 5, SE-141 57 Huddinge,
Sweden
Fax: +46 8585 836 10
Tel: +46 8585 836 21
E-mail: Camilla.dahlqvist@neurotec.ki.se
*Note
These authors contributed equally to this
work.
(Received 28 January 2005, revised 25
February 2005, accepted 7 March 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04647.x
Recently, a novel plaque-associated protein, collagenousAlzheimer amy-
loid plaquecomponent (CLAC), was identified in brains from patients with
Alzheimer’s disease. CLAC is derived from a type II transmembrane colla-
gen precursor protein, termed CLAC-P (collagen XXV). The biological
function and the contribution of CLAC to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s
disease and plaque formation are unknown. In vitro studies indicate that
CLAC binds to fibrillar, but not to monomeric, amyloid b-peptide (Ab).
Here, we examined the effects of CLAC on Ab fibrils using assays based
on turbidity, thioflavin T binding, sedimentation analysis, and electron
microscopy. The incubation of CLAC with preformed Ab fibrils led to
increased turbidity, indicating that larger aggregates were formed. In sup-
port of this contention, more Ab was sedimented in the presence of CLAC,
as determined by gel electrophoresis. Moreover, electron microscopy
revealed an increased amount of Ab fibril bundles in samples incubated
with CLAC. Importantly, the frequently used thioflavin T-binding assay
failed to reveal these effects of CLAC. Digestion with proteinase K or tryp-
sin showed that Ab fibrils, incubated together with CLAC, were more
resistant to proteolytic degradation. Therefore, CLAC assembles Ab fibrils
into fibril bundles that have an increased resistance to proteases. We sug-
gest that CLAC may act in a similar way in vivo.
Abbreviations
Ab, amyloid b-peptide; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; APP, b-amyloid precursor protein; CLAC, collagenousAlzheimeramyloid plaque
component ⁄ collagen XXV; EM, electron microscopy; NAC, non-amyloid-b-component; ThT, thioflavin T.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS 2231
and J, and heparin sulfate proteoglycans [5]. These pro-
teins have been suggested to act as ‘pathological chap-
erones’ that bind to Ab and favor its deposition. Other
proteins may have the opposite effect and attenuate
amyloidogenesis. The amorphous Ab aggregates found
in so-called diffuse plaques might be precursors of the
Ab fibrils found in mature plaques, but the mechanism
for this conversion remains to be determined.
Recently, a novel plaque-associated protein, colla-
genous Alzheimeramyloidplaquecomponent ⁄ collagen
XXV (CLAC) [6], was observed in brain from subjects
with AD. CLAC is derived from a type II transmem-
brane collagen protein, CLAC-P. We have recently
shown that the AMY antigen is identical to CLAC [7].
CLAC is a trimer formed from three identical polypep-
tides and includes three triple-helical collagen domains
that are flanked and separated by nonhelical domains
[8]. In vitro studies show that CLAC binds to fibrillized
Ab, but not to monomeric Ab [6,8]. The biological
function of CLAC, and the contribution of CLAC to
plaque formation and the pathogenesis of AD, are still
unknown. Previously, CLAC was shown to colocalize
with the more mature plaques, but not with Ab42-pos-
itive diffuse plaques or with amyloid deposits in cereb-
ral blood vessels [9,10]. Recently, it was suggested that
CLAC preferentially binds to plaques composed of
prefibrillar Ab42 and thus may prevent further matur-
ation of amyloid deposits [11]. Therefore, there is cur-
rently no clear consensus regarding to which form of
amyloid CLAC binds.
Here, we examined the effects of CLAC on Ab fibrils
in vitro using a v ariety of biochemical techniques. We
showed that the addition of CLAC to Ab fibri ls a s sembles
the latter i nto p rotease-resistant fibril bundles. W e suggest
that CLAC could have a similar effect on amyloid fibrils
in vivo an d thus i ncrease the am yloid burden.
Results and Discussion
Incubation of Ab1–40 fibrils with CLAC results
in further aggregation
The newly discovered plaque-associated protein, CLAC,
binds to Ab fibrils but not to monomeric Ab [6] (H
Kakuyama, L So
¨
derberg, K Horigome, C Dahlqvist,
B Winblad, J Na
¨
slund & LO Tjernberg, unpublished
results). In order to investigate the effect of CLAC on
fibrillar Ab, fibrils formed from 45 lm Ab1–40 were
incubated in the presence or absence of 100 nm CLAC.
The turbidity of the samples was measured at different
time-points and found to be increased after only
30 min in the presence of CLAC (Fig. 1A). As we use
preformed fibrils that are separated from soluble Ab
by centrifugation, the total amount of aggregated Ab
cannot increase. Therefore, we conclude that the
increase in turbidity arises from the formation of lar-
ger aggregates. To verify this result, we centrifuged the
samples and subjected them to SDS ⁄ PAGE. In the
presence of CLAC, the amount of Ab was increased in
the pellet and decreased in the supernatant as com-
pared to the control (Fig. 1B). This effect occurred
after only 30 min of incubation and remained evident
also after a longer incubation (18 h). We suggest that
A
C
B
Fig. 1. Incubation of amyloid b-peptide 1–40 (Ab1–40) fibrils with
collagenous Alzheimeramyloidplaquecomponent ⁄ collagen XXV
(CLAC) results in further aggregation. (A) Turbidity measurements
of Ab1–40 fibrils incubated, for 30 min and 18 h, in the presence
(100 n
M) or absence of CLAC. (B) Coomassie staining of Ab1–40
fibrils incubated in the presence of CLAC (100 n
M) or NaCl ⁄ Tris.
The pellet samples (P) were sedimented, washed and dissolved in
70% (v ⁄ v) formic acid (FA). The supernatant samples (Sup) were
sedimented from the supernatant of the first centrifugation and dis-
solved in 70% (v ⁄ v) FA. (C) Electron micrographs of mixtures con-
taining preformed Ab1–40 fibrils incubated in the presence of CLAC
(100 n
M) or NaCl ⁄ P
i
for 24 h at room temperature. Samples were
prepared for electron microscopy as described in the Experimental
procedures. Scale bars, 200 nm.
Studies on CLAC and Ab interactions in vitro L. So
¨
derberg et al.
2232 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS
the increased amount of sedimented material is caused
by an increase in the size of the aggregates in the pres-
ence of CLAC. No CLAC could be detected in the
supernatant after incubation, and CLAC was recovered
in the carefully washed pellet, as analyzed by western
blot and mass spectrometry (data not shown). These
data correlate with the turbidity measurements and sup-
port a function for CLAC in fibril assembly. The con-
trol protein, aldolase, which does not bind to Ab fibrils,
had no such effect (data not shown). To investigate
whether the effect of CLAC was specific for Ab fibrils,
we performed the same set of experiments on fibrils
formed from another amyloid forming protein, non-
amyloid-b-component (NAC) [12]. CLAC was found to
have a similar effect on NAC fibrils, indicating that
CLAC could affect other fibrils in a similar way (data
not shown). Preformed fibrils incubated for 24 h in the
presence or absence of CLAC were subjected to electron
microscopy (EM) analysis. A significant increase in the
number of large aggregates was observed in the presence
of CLAC (Fig. 1C). Thus, EM data also support the
notion that CLAC can assemble Ab fibrilsinto larger
aggregates. A similar function has not been described
for other proteins that are known to bind Ab fibrils,
such as apolipoprotein E or laminin.
CLAC protects fibrillar Ab1–40, but not soluble
Ab1–40, from proteolysis
To investigate the biological relevance of CLAC’s
assembly of preformed fibrils, we used proteinase K and
trypsin to determine whether the interaction between
CLAC and Ab fibrils results in protection of the peptide
from proteolysis. Both fibrillar Ab1–40 and soluble
Ab1–40 were tested for protease resistance in the pres-
ence or absence of CLAC. CLAC and fibrillar Ab were
incubated at room temperature for 2 h before the addi-
tion of proteases. The extent of Ab proteolysis was eval-
uated by SDS ⁄ PAGE and western blot analysis. When
the fibrils were incubated without CLAC, only a small
amount of Ab remained after 2 h of digestion with pro-
teinase K, and the samples were completely degraded
after 18 h of digestion (Fig. 2A). In contrast, when the
fibrils were preincubated with CLAC, Ab was still pre-
sent after 18 h of digestion (Fig. 2A). Digestion with
trypsin was less efficient but, in this case, CLAC had a
protective effect (Fig. 2B). In contrast, CLAC did not
have a protective effect on soluble Ab1–40 (Fig. 2C).
Our findings offer an explanation for the increased pro-
tease resistance of CLAC positive plaques [13]. There-
fore, we speculate that CLAC assembles Ab fibrils
into protease-resistant aggregates in vivo and thereby
obstructs the clearance of amyloid.
Fibril assembly results in decreased thioflavin T
(ThT) fluorescence
One of the most frequently used methods for studying
Ab polymerization is based on the altered fluorescence
of ThT upon binding to amyloid aggregates. Therefore,
we investigated whether the ThT assay could be used to
study the CLAC-induced assembly of Ab fibrils. When
Ab fibrils are incubated in the presence of CLAC there
is a striking reduction in ThT fluorescence (Fig. 3A),
which is not accompanied by a reduction in the amount
of sedimented Ab, as analyzed by SDS ⁄ PAGE and
staining with Coomassie blue (Fig. 3B). Similar results
were obtained after incubation with the positive control,
laminin, while incubation with the negative control,
aldolase, had no effect on ThT fluorescence (data not
shown). When freshly solubilized Ab1–40 was incubated
for 5 days, a similar reduction in ThT fluorescence was
observed in the presence of CLAC (Fig. 4A). No reduc-
tion in the amount of fibrils was observed by EM, but
the fibrils appeared to aggregate more in the presence of
CLAC (Fig. 4B). As CLAC binds to Ab fibrils, but not
to freshly dissolved Ab, CLAC does not affect the lag-
phase (Fig. 4A), and the reduction in ThT fluorescence
at the end-point is probably a result of the effect of
A
B
C
Fig. 2. CollagenousAlzheimeramyloidplaquecomponent ⁄ collagen
XXV (CLAC) protects fibrillar amyloid b-peptide 1–40 (Ab1–40) from
proteolysis. (A) Fibrillar Ab1–40 was preincubated with CLAC (at a
final concentration of 200 n
M) for 2 h before the addition of protein-
ase K (PK) at an enzyme ⁄ Ab ratio of 1 : 10 (w ⁄ w). Samples were
taken at the time-points indicated and analyzed on a 10–20%
(w ⁄ w) tricine gel, stained with Coomassie blue, and immunoblotted
using 4G8 and 6E10 antibodies. (B) Fibrillar Ab1–40 treated with
trypsin. (C) Freshly solubilized Ab1–40 (50 l
M) was preincubated
with CLAC (at a final concentration of 200 n
M), digested with PK
and analyzed as described in A.
L. So
¨
derberg et al. Studies on CLAC and Ab interactions in vitro
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS 2233
CLAC on the fibrils formed during polymerization. If
the reduced ThT fluorescence is caused by the increased
fibril assembly in the presence of CLAC, no reduction in
fluorescence should be observed if the fibrils are immo-
bilized prior to the addition of CLAC. When Ab fibrils
were immobilized onto microtiter wells, CLAC had no
effect on ThT fluorescence (Fig. 4C). Thus, the assembly
of fibrils leads to a reduction in ThT fluorescence, poss-
ibly because of a decrease in the number of ThT-binding
sites and ⁄ or quenching owing to a high concentration of
ThT in the bundles. This is in keeping with a previous
report [14]. Based on ThT fluorescence analysis, a num-
ber of compounds have been reported to depolymerize
fibrillized Ab within a few hours [15,16]. In the light of
our present study, we would like to point out that the
results from ThT-binding studies must be evaluated
carefully and supplemented with data obtained by using
alternative techniques. In summary, we have shown that
CLAC assembles Ab fibrilsinto protease-resistant
aggregates. We speculate that this process may be of
relevance for AD pathogenesis, offering one explanation
for the accumulation of amyloid plaques in vivo. Future
studies in mice with altered CLAC expression will
investigate this hypothesis.
Experimental procedures
Preparation of fibrillar Ab
Ab1–40 and A b 1–42 were purchased from Bachem (Buben-
dorf, Switzerland). Ab fibrils were prepared by mixing
lyophilized peptide with ultrapure water to obtain a peptide
A
B
Fig. 3. Reduction in thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence in the presence
of collagenousAlzheimeramyloidplaquecomponent ⁄ collagen XXV
(CLAC) does not correlate with the amount of sedimented amyloid
b-peptide (Ab). (A). Preformed Ab1–40 fibrils incubated in the pres-
ence (100 n
M) or absence of CLAC were mixed with 200 lLof
10 l
M ThT for 15 min. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM
of a triplicate result of a representative experiment. (B) The sam-
ples (one of the triplicates) were centrifuged, washed, dissolved in
70% (v ⁄ v) formic acid and vacuum dried, then loaded onto a
10–20% (w ⁄ w) tricine gel and stained with Coomassie blue after
electrophoresis. The samples from time-points 0, 0.5 and 1 h, for
fibrils incubated either with CLAC or with buffer, were analyzed on
the same gel to allow comparison of the fibril amount. The samples
from 2, 3 and 4 h were analyzed on another gel.
A
B
C
Fig. 4. Effect of collagenousAlzheimeramyloidplaque compo-
nent ⁄ collagen XXV (CLAC) on the polymerization of amyloid b-pep-
tide 1–40 (Ab1–40). (A) A concentration of 25 l
M freshly dissolved
Ab1–40 in NaCl ⁄ Tris, pH 7.4, was incubated for 5 days at room
temperature, with shaking (600 r.p.m.), in the presence or absence
of CLAC (final concentration 100 n
M). A molar ratio of Ab1–
40 ⁄ CLAC of 250 : 1 was used. Fibril formation was monitored by
ThT fluorescence. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM of
three separate experiments. (B) Negative stain electron micro-
graphs of the 5 day incubation mixtures in (A). Ab1–40 fibrils in the
absence of CLAC (left panel) or in its presence (right panel). Scale
bar, 100 nm. (C) One nanomol of Ab 1–42 fibrils was allowed to dry
onto microtiter wells and incubated with CLAC (a final concentra-
tion of 250 n
M), followed by incubation with a thioflavin T (ThT)
solution of 10 or 100 l
M. Fluorescence was measured with an exci-
tation of 440 nm and an emission of 490 nm.
Studies on CLAC and Ab interactions in vitro L. So
¨
derberg et al.
2234 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS
concentration of 200 lm. This solution was subsequently
stirred gently for 5 min before the addition of 2· NaCl ⁄ P
i
,
pH 7.4, to a final concentration of 100 lm and then vigor-
ously stirred for an additional 2–4 days. Before use in
assays, fibrils were sedimented by centrifugation at 10 000 g
for 10 min and the supernatant was replaced by an equal
volume of NaCl ⁄ P
i
.
Ab turbidity and detection
Preformed Ab1–40 fibrils were mixed with 100 nm CLAC.
The CLAC used in this study was purified from HEK293
cells, as recently described [8]. Ab1–40 fibrils and CLAC or
NaCl ⁄ Tris, pH 7.4, were incubated at room temperature
with shaking (600 r.p.m.). At the indicated time-points, sam-
ples (50 lL) were subjected to turbidity measurements.
Turbidity was measured at 355 nm (FLUOstar Galaxy;
BMG Labtechnologies GmbH, Offenburg, Germany) and
control values of the absorbance of buffer alone were sub-
tracted from all measurements. To detect the amount of Ab
fibrils after ThT fluorescence measurements, the samples
were transferred into Eppendorf tubes and subjected to cen-
trifugation for 5 min at 10 000 g. The resulting pellet was
washed twice with NaCl ⁄ Tris, while the supernatant was
transferred to a new tube and centrifuged for 5 min at
10 000 g. The supernatant was discarded and both pellets
were dissolved in 70% (v ⁄ v) formic acid overnight. Samples
were vacuum dried to remove the formic acid and then
resuspended in 100 mm Tris, pH 10.5, containing 9 m urea,
prior to analysis by Coomassie blue staining on a 10–20%
(w ⁄ w) tricine gel.
Electron microscopy
Samples incubated for 24 h were vortexed, and 10 lL aliqu-
ots of the sample were then applied to formvar-coated
grids. After 5 min, excess fluid was withdrawn and the grids
were allowed to dry. Buffer salts were removed by dipping
the grids (10 times) into redistilled water. The specimens
were negatively stained with 2% (w ⁄ v) uranyl acetate in
water, examined in a Philips CM120 electron microscope at
80 kV, and photographed using a MegaView III CCD cam-
era (Soft Imaging System, Mu
¨
nster, Germany).
Proteolysis of the Ab1–40/CLAC complex
Ab1–40 fibrils were prepared as described above. Fibrils
were subjected to proteolysis using proteinase K (Sigma
Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA; Signet Laboratories, Ded-
ham, MA, USA) and trypsin (Boehringer Mannheim,
Milan, Italy) at an enzyme ⁄ protein ratio of 1 : 10 (w ⁄ w) for
all experiments. CLAC (at a final concentration of 200 nm)
was added to Ab1–40 fibrils (50 lm) or to freshly dissolved
Ab1–40 (50 lm) in NaCl ⁄ P
i
and incubated for 2 h before
the addition of proteinase K or trypsin. Aliquots were
taken after 0, 2 and 18 h of incubation at 37 °C. The reac-
tion was stopped by the addition of formic acid to a final
concentration of 70%. Samples were treated, as described
above, prior to SDS ⁄ PAGE analysis on 10–20% (w ⁄ w)
tricine gels followed by staining with Coomassie blue and
immunoblotting using 6E10 and 4G8 antibodies (Signet
Laboratories).
ThT assay
The ThT-binding assay [17] was used to measure the
amount of Ab1–40 fibrils in the presence of CLAC. Twenty
microlitres of Ab, incubated in the presence or absence of
CLAC, laminin or aldolase, was aspirated and further incu-
bated for 15 min with 200 lLof10lm ThT solution
(10 mm phosphate buffer, 150 mm NaCl, pH 6.0). Fluores-
cence spectra of ThT were acquired using a fluorescence
spectrometer (FLUOstar Galaxy), with excitation at
440 nm and emission at 490 nm. Control spectra of the
ThT solution alone were recorded and subtracted from all
measurements. The amount of Ab in the pellet fraction was
determined as described above. For the polymerization
assay, a stock solution of 1 mgÆmL
)1
Ab1–40 in dimethyl-
sulfoxide was diluted in NaCl ⁄ Tris to a final concentration
of 25 lm.Ab polymerization was carried out in the pres-
ence of CLAC (100 nm)orAb1–40 alone at room tempera-
ture with continuous shaking at 600 r.p.m. At the indicated
time-points, a 50 lL aliquot from each incubation mixture
was analyzed for Ab fibril formation by mixing with
200 lL of ThT solution, and the fluorescence was measured
as described above.
Solid-phase ThT-binding assay
A competition assay based on solid-phase binding was
used, as previously described, with some minor modifica-
tions [6,8]. Briefly, a dimethylsulfoxide stock solution of
Ab1–42 was diluted in NaCl ⁄ P
i
to a concentration of
20 lm. One nanomol of Ab1–42 was allowed to bind to
microtiter wells (MaxiSorp; Nunc, Naperville, IL, USA)
and dry overnight, at 37 °C. Wells were blocked for 1 h in
NaCl ⁄ P
i
containing 1% (w ⁄ v) BSA (blocking buffer) fol-
lowed by washing with NaCl ⁄ P
i
-T [NaCl ⁄ Pi containing
0.05% (v ⁄ v) Tween-20 (Sigma)] in a microplate
washer (ASYS Hitech; Atlantis, GmbH, Eugendolf,
Austria). Ab was incubated with 250 nm CLAC in blocking
buffer, or in blocking buffer only, for 1 h at room tempera-
ture. The wells were washed in NaCl ⁄ Pi-T and incubated
with NaCl ⁄ P
i
containing 10 or 100 lm ThT for 30 min fol-
lowed by washing in NaCl ⁄ P
i
-T. One-hundred microlitres
of NaCl ⁄ P
i
was added to the wells, and binding of ThT
was measured in a microplate reader (FLUOstar Galaxy)
with excitation at 440 nm and emission at 490 nm.
L. So
¨
derberg et al. Studies on CLAC and Ab interactions in vitro
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS 2235
References
1 Selkoe DJ (2001) Alzheimer’s disease: genes, proteins,
and therapy. Physiol Rev 81, 741–766.
2 Jarrett JT & Lansbury PT (1993) Seeding ‘one-dimen-
sional crystallization’ of amyloid: a pathogenic mechan-
ism in Alzheimer’s disease and scrapie? Cell 73, 1055–
1058.
3 Iwatsubo T, Odaka A, Suzuki N, Mizusawa H, Nukina
N & Ihara Y (1994) Visualization of Abeta 42 (43) and
Abeta 40 in senile plaques with end-specific Abeta
monoclonals: evidence that an initially deposited species
is Abeta 42 (43). Neuron 13, 45–53.
4 Hardy J (1997) Amyloid, the presenilins and Alzhei-
mer’s disease. Trends Neurosci 20, 154–159.
5 Dickson DW (1997) The pathogenesis of senile plaques.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 56 , 321–339.
6 Hashimoto T, Wakabayashi T, Watanabe A, Kowa H,
Hosoda R, Nakamura A, Kanazawa I, Arai T, Takio
K, Mann DM et al. (2002) CLAC: a novel Alzheimer
amyloid plaquecomponent derived from a transmem-
brane precursor CLAC-P ⁄ collagen type XXV. EMBO J
21, 1524–1534.
7So
¨
derberg L, Zhukareva V, Bogdanovic N, Hashimoto
T, Winblad B, Iwatsubo T, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ &
Na
¨
slund J (2003) Molecular identification of AMY, an
Alzheimer disease amyloid-associated protein. J Neuro-
pathol Exp Neurol 62, 1108–1117.
8So
¨
derberg L, Kakuyama H, Mo
¨
ller A, Ito A, Winblad
B, Tjernberg LO & Na
¨
slund J (2005) Characterization
of the Alzheimer’s disease-associated CLAC protein and
identification of an amyloid beta-peptide binding site.
J Biol Chem 280, 1007–1015.
9 Lemere CA, Grenfell TJ & Selkoe DJ (1999) The AMY
antigen co-occurs with abeta and follows its deposition
in the amyloid plaques of Alzheimer’s disease and down
syndrome. Am J Pathol 155, 29–37.
10 Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Forman M, Chiu TS & Troja-
nowski JQ (1997) Monoclonal antibodies to a 100-kd
protein reveal abundant Abeta-negative plaques
throughout gray matter of Alzheimer’s disease brains.
Am J Pathol 151, 69–80.
11 Kowa H, Sakakura T, Matsuura Y, Wakabayashi T,
Mann DM, Duff K, Tsuji S, Hashimoto T & Iwatsubo
T (2004) Mostly separate distributions of CLAC- versus
Abeta40- or thioflavin S-reactivities in senile plaques
reveal two distinct subpopulations of beta-amyloid
deposits. Am J Pathol 165, 273–281.
12 Ueda K, Fukushima H, Masliah E, Xia Y, Iwai A,
Yoshimoto M, Otero DA, Kondo J, Ihara Y & Saitoh
T (1993) Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding an
unrecognized component of amyloid in Alzheimer
disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 11282–11286.
13 Kowa H, Sakakura T, Matsuura Y, Wakabayashi T,
Tsuji S, Mann DM, Hashimoto T & Iwatsubo T (2004)
CLAC-positive senile plaques in Alzheimer brains:
mutually exclusive distribution to Abeta40 and acquisi-
tion of protease resistance. Abstracts from the 9th Inter-
national Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease and
Related Disorders, July 17–22, Abstract: P1–235. Neuro-
biol Aging 25, S 163 (Suppl.), 15.
14 Moss MA, Varvel NH, Nichols MR, Reed DK &
Rosenberry TL (2004) Nordihydroguaiaretic acid does
not disaggregate beta-amyloid (1–40) protofibrils but
does inhibit growth arising from direct protofibril
association. Mol Pharmacol 66, 592–600.
15 Morgan C, Bugueno MP, Garrido J & Inestrosa NC
(2002) Laminin affects polymerization, depolymerization
and neurotoxicity of Abeta peptide. Peptides 23, 1229–
1240.
16 Ono K, Hasegawa K, Yoshiike Y, Takashima A,
Yamada M & Naiki H (2002) Nordihydroguaiaretic
acid potently breaks down pre-formed Alzheimer’s
beta-amyloid fibrils in vitro. J Neurochem 81, 434–440.
17 LeVine III H (1993) Thioflavine T interaction with syn-
thetic Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid peptides: detec-
tion of amyloid aggregation in solution. Protein Sci 2,
404–410.
Studies on CLAC and Ab interactions in vitro L. So
¨
derberg et al.
2236 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2231–2236 ª 2005 FEBS
. Collagenous Alzheimer amyloid plaque component assembles amyloid fibrils into protease resistant aggregates Linda So ¨ derberg 1, *, Camilla Dahlqvist 1, *,. vivo. Abbreviations Ab, amyloid b-peptide; AD, Alzheimer s disease; APP, b -amyloid precursor protein; CLAC, collagenous Alzheimer amyloid plaque component ⁄ collagen XXV; EM, electron microscopy; NAC, non -amyloid- b -component; . Incubation of amyloid b-peptide 1–40 (Ab1–40) fibrils with collagenous Alzheimer amyloid plaque component ⁄ collagen XXV (CLAC) results in further aggregation. (A) Turbidity measurements of Ab1–40 fibrils