Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 12 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
12
Dung lượng
485,54 KB
Nội dung
MINIREVIEW
Ribonuclease H:moleculardiversities,substrate binding
domains, andcatalyticmechanismofthe prokaryotic
enzymes
Takashi Tadokoro and Shigenori Kanaya
Department of Material and Life Science, Osaka University, Japan
Identification of bacterial RNase HIII
with a TBP-like substrate-binding
domain
RNase H is defined as an enzyme that specifically
hydrolyzes the phosphodiester bonds of RNA hybrid-
ized to DNA at the P–O3¢ bond. Prokaryotic
RNases H, which are involved in DNA replication,
repair and transcription [1,2] have been classified into
RNases HI, HII and HIII based on differences in
their amino acid sequences [3,4] (Fig. 1). RNase HI
represents type 1 RNase H, and RNases HII and
HIII represent type 2 RNase H. The genes encoding
RNase HI [5] and RNase HII [6] were first cloned
from the Escherichia coli genome in 1983 and 1990,
respectively. The gene encoding RNase HIII was first
cloned from the Bacillus subtilis genome in 1999 [3].
Two different terminologies, RNases HII and HIII,
are given to type 2 RNases H because certain bacte-
rial genomes, such as the B. subtilis, Streptococ-
cus pneumoniae and Aquifex aeolicus genomes, contain
two genes encoding type 2 RNases H. The protein
that shows higher amino acid sequence similarity
to E. coli RNase HII is designated as RNase HII,
whereas the other is designated as RNase HIII.
Unlike RNase HII, which is widely present in various
organisms including bacteria and archaea,
RNase HIII is present only in a limited number of
bacteria [3,4].
Keywords
catalytic mechanism; crystal structure;
evolution; genome; hybrid binding domain;
molecular diversity; prokaryote; RNase H;
RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid; substrate-binding domain
Correspondence
S. Kanaya, Department of Material and Life
Science, Graduate School of Engineering,
Osaka University, 2-1, Yamadaoka, Suita,
Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Fax ⁄ Tel: +81 6 6879 7938
E-mail: kanaya@mls.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp
(Received 18 October 2008, revised 18
December 2008, accepted 12 January 2009)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06907.x
The prokaryotic genomes, for which complete nucleotide sequences are
available, always contain at least one RNase H gene, indicating that
RNase H is ubiquitous in all prokaryotic cells. Coupled with its unique
substrate specificity, the enzyme has been expected to play crucial roles in
the biochemical processes associated with DNA replication, gene expression
and DNA repair. The physiological role ofprokaryotic RNases H, espe-
cially of type 1 RNases H, has been extensively studied using Escherichia
coli strains that are defective in RNase HI activity or overproduce
RNase HI. However, it is not fully understood yet. By contrast, significant
progress has been made in this decade in identifying novel RNases H with
respect to their biochemical properties and structures, and elucidating
catalytic mechanismandsubstrate recognition mechanismof RNase H.
We review the results of these studies.
Abbreviations
Afu, Archaeoglobus fulgidus; Bha, Bacillus halodurans; Bst, Bacillus stearothermophilus; Bsu, Bacillus subtilis; Eco, Escherichia coli; Halo,
Halobacterium sp. NRC-1; HBD, hybrid binding domain; HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; Mja, Methanococcus jannaschii;
MMLV, Moloney murine leukemia virus; Pae, Pyrobaculum aerophilum; RNase H, ribonuclease H; Son, Shewanella oneidensis; Sto,
Sulfolobus tokodaii; TBP, TATA-box binding proteins; Tko, Thermococcus kodakaraensis; Tma, Thermotoga maritima; Tth,
Thermus thermophilus.
1482 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS
The enzymatic properties of RNase HIII have been
well characterized using B. subtilis RNase HIII (Bsu-
RNase HIII) [3]. RNase HIII is evolutionarily more
distantly related to RNase HI than to RNase HII. For
example, Bsu-RNase HIII shows the poor amino
acid sequence identity to E. coli RNase HI (Eco-
RNase HI), whereas it shows the amino acid sequence
identities of 20–21% to E. coli RNase HII (Eco-
RNase HII) and B. subtilis RNase HII (Bsu-RNase
HII). Nevertheless, Bsu-RNases HIII is more closely
related to Eco-RNase HI than to Eco-RNase HII or
Bsu-RNase HII in the enzymatic properties, such as
metal ion specificities, specific activities and cleavage
site specificities. These results may suggest that
Bsu-RNase HIII functions as a substitute for Eco-
RNase HI. However, it has been reported for
Chlamydophila pneumoniae that the RNase HII ⁄ HIII
combination is not a simple substitution of Eco-RNase
HI ⁄ HII [7,8].
RNases HIII are characterized by the presence of a
long N-terminal extension compared with other type 2
RNases H (Fig. 1). The amino acid sequences of these
extensions show a significant similarity to those of
TATA-box binding proteins (TBPs). The first crystal
structure of RNase HIII was determined using
RNase HIII from the moderate thermophile B. stearo-
thermophilus (Bst-RNase HIII) [9]. Bst-RNase HIII
shows the amino acid sequence identity of 47.1% to
Bsu-RNase HIII and has a similar N-terminal exten-
sion. Its enzymatic properties are similar to those of
Bsu-RNase HIII, except that it is more stable [10].
According to the crystal structure of Bst-RNase HIII,
the N-terminal extension assumes a TBP-like structure
and is present as an independent domain (Fig. 2). The
Fig. 1. Schematic representation ofthe pri-
mary structures ofprokaryotic RNases H.
The primary structures ofthe representative
members of type 1 (A) and type 2 (B)
RNases H, which have been reported to be
enzymatically active, are shown. Solid box
represents the RNase H domain and gray
box represents TBP-like domain, hybrid-bind-
ing domain (HBD) or acid phosphatase
domain. The positions ofthe four acidic
active site residues andthe histidine resi-
due, which is well conserved in type 1
RNases H, are shown. The numbers repre-
sent the positions ofthe amino acid
residues relative to the initiator methionine
for each protein.
T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya Prokaryotic RNases H
FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1483
structure ofthe C-terminal RNase H domain is highly
similar to those of archaeal RNases HII [11–13]
(Fig. 2). The active site motif of RNase HIII (DEDE)
is similar, but is not identical to that of RNase HI or
HII (DEDD) [4] (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the steric
configurations of these four acidic active-site residues
are very similar to those of RNases HI and HII. Bio-
chemical characterization ofthe Bst-RNase HIII deriv-
atives with N- and ⁄ or C-terminal truncations indicates
that the N-terminal domain with a TBP-like structure
and C-terminal helix are involved in substrate binding,
but the former contributes to substratebinding more
greatly than the latter [9]. TBP binds to the target
DNA at the flat surface ofthe molecule [14–16]. The
N-terminal domain of RNase HIII probably uses the
same surface for substratebinding as TBP to bind
DNA.
Identification of archaeal type 1
RNases H
Most ofthe archaeal genomes, for which the complete
genome sequences are available, only contain the
type 2 RNase H (RNase HII) genes. The exceptions
are the Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, Sulfolobus tokodaii
and Pyrobaculum aerophilum genomes, which contain
the type 1 RNase H (RNase HI) genes in addition to
the RNase HII genes. The first archaeal RNase HI
protein, which was shown to be active both in vivo and
in vitro, is RNase HI from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1
(Halo-RNase HI) [17]. Later, RNases HI from
S. tokodaii (Sto-RNase HI) and P. aerophilum (Pae-
RNase HI) were also shown to be enzymatically active
[18]. Database searches using the Sto-RNase HI
sequence indicate that not only the archaeal genomes,
Fig. 1. (Continued).
Prokaryotic RNases H T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya
1484 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS
but also the bacterial and eukaryotic genomes contain
the genes encoding a Sto-RNase HI homologue. Of
them, the Sto-RNase HI homologue from B. subtilis
(YpdQ) is inactive [3], whereas those from Strepto-
myces coelicolor (SCO7284 [18] and SCO2299 [19]) and
Corynebacterium glutamicum (Cg12236) [20] are active.
Phylogenetic analyses ofthe type 1 RNase H
sequences show that the Sto-RNase HI homologues
form an independent domain, which is different from
those of bacterial, eukaryotic and retroviral type 1
RNases H [18]. Characteristics common to the amino
acid sequences of these Sto-RNase HI homologues are
the lack of a basic protrusion, which has been shown
to be important for substratebinding in Eco -
RNase HI [21,22], andthe lack ofthe histidine residue,
which is well conserved in other type 1 RNases H and
has been shown to be important for catalytic function
of Eco-RNase HI [23] (Fig. 1).
Sto-RNase HI consists of 149 amino acid residues
and has neither an N-terminal nor C-terminal extension
compared with Eco-RNase HI (Fig. 1). By contrast,
Halo-RNase HI consists of 199 residues and has an
N-terminal 65-residue extension (Fig. 1). This extension
does not show significant amino acid sequence similar-
ity to an N-terminal TBP-like domain of RNases HIII
or hybrid-binding domain (HBD) of eukaryotic
RNases H1. Sto-RNase HI and Halo-RNase HI exhibit
unique enzymatic properties. They cleave the substrate
at the RNA–DNA junction [17,18]. Interestingly, Sto -
RNase HI exhibits RNase H* activity, which degrades
the RNA strand ofthe RNA ⁄ RNA duplex [18]. It has
been reported that retroviral RNases H cleave the
RNA–DNA junction [24] and exhibit RNase H* activ-
ity [25]. Thus, archaeal RNases HI are more closely
related to retroviral RNases H than bacterial and
eukaryotic type 1 RNases H in enzymatic properties.
The crystal structure of Sto-RNase HI was deter-
mined as the first archaeal type 1 RNase H structure
[26] (Fig. 2). Despite the low amino acid sequence
identity between Sto-RNase HI and other type 1
RNases H, Sto-RNase HI shows high structural simi-
larity to these RNases H, including Eco-RNase HI
[27,28], human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
RNase H [29,30] and Bacillus halodurans RNase HI
(Bha-RNase HI) [31]. The steric configurations of the
four acidic active-site residues are well conserved in
the Sto-RNase HI structure (Fig. 3). Like other
Sto-RNase HI homologues, Sto-RNase HI lacks a his-
tidine residue, which is well conserved in various
type 1 RNases H. However, Arg118 of Sto-RNase HI
is located in the same position as His124 of
Eco-RNase HI, His539 of HIV-1 RNase H and
Glu188 of Bha-RNase H. Mutation of this residue to
Ala considerably reduces both the RNase H and
RNase H* activities without seriously affecting sub-
strate binding, suggesting that Arg118 is involved in
catalytic function [26]. This residue may promote prod-
uct release by perturbing the coordination ofthe metal
ion A, as proposed for Glu188 of Bha-RNase H [31].
The catalyticmechanismof RNase H is described in
more detail below.
As described below under ‘Substrate recognition
mechanism’, RNase H has two grooves in which the
RNA and DNA backbones of RNA ⁄ DNA hybrids
bind. A phosphate-binding pocket and DNA-binding
channel located in the DNA-binding groove are respon-
sible for the specificity of RNase H for the RNA ⁄ DNA
Fig. 2. Crystal structures ofprokaryotic RNases H. Ribbon dia-
grams of RNases HI from S. tokodaii (Sto-RNase HI) (PDB code
2EHG) and E. coli (Eco-RNase HI) (PDB code 2RN2), RNases HII
from T. maritima (Tma-RNase HII) (PDB code 2ETJ) and T. kodaka-
raensis (Tko-RNase HII) (PDB code 1IO2), and B. stearothermophi-
lus RNase HIII (Bst-RNase HIII) (PDB code 2D0A). N and C
represent the N- and C-termini. Four acidic active site residues are
shown as ball-and-stick models. The basic protrusion of Eco-RNa-
se HI, and TBP-like domain and C-terminal helix of Bst-RNase HIII
are indicated.
T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya Prokaryotic RNases H
FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1485
hybrid. However, the amino acid residues forming the
phosphate-binding pocket are not well conserved in the
Sto-RNase HI structure. In addition, the DNA-binding
channel, which is formed in the basic protrusion, is not
present in the Sto-RNase HI structure because Sto-
RNase HI lacks a basic protrusion. By contrast, the
RNA-binding groove is well conserved in the Sto-
RNase HI structure. The weak conservation of the
DNA-binding groove may account for the ability of
Sto-RNase HI to cleave double-stranded (ds)RNA.
Weaker conservation ofthe DNA-binding groove com-
pared with that ofthe RNA-binding groove is also
observed in HIV-1 and Moloney murine leukemia virus
(MMLV) RNases H.
It is noted that the structure of Sto-RNase HI is
highly similar to that ofthe RNase H-like domain of
the PIWI domain of Argonaute from A. aiolicus [32].
Unlike other Argonaute proteins, A. aeolicus Argona-
ute exhibits both RNA-guided and DNA-guided
RNase activities, using the RNase H-like domain of
the PIWI domain [32].
Identification of bacterial RNase HI
with an N-terminal hybrid binding
domain
HBD-RNase HI from the psychrotrophic bacterium
Shewanella sp. SIB1 is the first bacterial type 1
RNase H protein containing an N-terminal HBD to
be characterized biochemically [33]. Bha-RNase HI
also contains HBD at the N-terminus [31]. HBD,
which has previously been designated as a dsRNA
binding domain, consists of 50 amino acid residues
and is commonly present at the N-termini of eukary-
otic type 1 RNases H [34]. This domain is renamed
as HBD, because HBD of human RNase H1 binds
more strongly to RNA ⁄ DNA hybrids than to
dsRNA [35]. Thebindingmechanismof HBD and
its role in enzymatic activity is discussed in more
detail below, based on the co-crystal structure of
HBD of human RNase H1 with the RNA ⁄ DNA
hybrid [35].
HBD-RNase HI from Shewanella sp. SIB1, which
has previously been designated as RBD-RNase HI
[33], consists of 262 amino acid residues (Fig. 1). The
Shewanella sp. SIB1 genome contains RNase HI [36]
and RNase HII [37] genes as well. All three RNase H
proteins are enzymatically active. Thus, this genome
contains three active RNase H genes (two type 1 and
one type 2). In addition to SIB1 genome, the S. frigid-
imarina, S. denitrificans and Photobacterium profundum
genomes contain three genes encoding RNase HI,
HBD-RNase HI and RNase HII. Of these, two type 1
RNases H, HBD-RNase HI (RNase H domain) always
shows lower sequence identity to Eco-RNase HI. For
example, SIB1 HBD-RNase HI and SIB1 RNase HI
show amino acid sequence identities of 17 and 63% to
Eco-RNase HI, respectively. It has been reported that
the S. coelicolor genome also contains three active
RNase H genes encoding two type 1 and one type 2
RNases H [19]. However, none of them contain HBD
at the N-termini. Interestingly, one of these type 1
RNases H (SCO2299) is a bifunctional enzyme consist-
ing of an N-terminal RNase H domain and a C-termi-
nal acid phosphatase domain [19] (Fig. 1).
Catalytic mechanismof RNase H
The crystal structures of eight type 1 and five type 2
RNases H have so far been determined. They are
Eco-RNase HI [27,28], Thermus thermophilus RNase HI
(Tth-RNase HI) [38], Bha-RNase HI [31], Shewanel-
la oneidensis RNase HI (Son-RNase HI) [39],
Sto-RNase HI [26], HIV-1 RNase H [29,30], MMLV
RNase H [40,41] and human RNase H1 [42] for type 1
RNases H, and Methanococcus jannaschii RNase HII
Fig. 3. Stereoview ofthe active site struc-
tures of RNases H. The side chains of the
active site residues of Sto-RNase HI
(salmon) and HIV-1 RNase H (green) are
superimposed onto those in the co-crystal
structure of Bha-RNase H with the sub-
strate and metal ions (yellow). The positions
of the RNA strand ofthesubstrate with the
scissile phosphate group between R()1)
and R(0) and two metal ions A and B are
also shown.
Prokaryotic RNases H T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya
1486 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS
(Mja-RNase HII) [11], Thermococcus kodakaraensis
RNase HII (Tko-RNase HII) [12], Archaeoglobus fulgi-
dus RNase HII (Afu-RNase HII) [13], Bst-RNase HIII
[9] and Thermotoga maritima RNase HII (Tma-RNase -
HII) (PDB code 2ETJ) for type 2 RNases H. The struc-
tures ofthe representative members of these RNases H
are shown in Fig. 2. These structures share a main chain
fold, termed the RNase H-fold, and steric configura-
tions ofthe four acidic active-site residues, suggesting
that their catalytic mechanisms are basically identical.
It has long been controversial whether the enzyme
requires one or two metal ions for activity, because the
number ofthe metal-binding sites found in the crystal
structures ofthe enzyme–metal ion complex formed in
the absence ofthesubstrate varies for different
enzymes and different metal ions. For example, single
Mg
2+
[43] and Mn
2+
[44] ions bind to the active sites
of the wild-type and mutant proteins of Eco-RNa-
se HI, respectively, whereas two Mn
2+
ions bind to
Eco-RNase HI [45] and HIV-1 RNase H [29]. How-
ever, the co-crystal structure of Bha-RNase HI with
RNA ⁄ DNA substrateand Mg
2+
[31] shows that two
Mg
2+
ions bind to the active site ofthe enzyme
(Fig. 3). Both metal ions are coordinated by the acidic
active site residues, scissile phosphate group of the
substrate and water molecules. The distance between
these two metal ions increases when thesubstrate is
cleaved [46]. Based on these results, two-metal-ion
catalysis mechanism has been proposed for RNase H
[31,46,47]. According to this mechanism, metal ion A
is required for substrate-assisted nucleophile formation
and product release, and metal ion B is required to
destabilize the enzyme–substrate complex and thereby
promote the phosphoryl transfer reaction (Fig. 4).
However, it remains controversial whether an active
site carboxyl group directly participates in catalysis as
a general base [48].
In addition to the four acidic active site residues, the
histidine residue is well conserved in the type 1
RNase H sequences (His124 for Eco-RNase HI and
His539 for HIV-1 RNase H) (Fig. 1). This residue is
located in the flexible loop near the active site and is
involved in thecatalytic function, but in an auxiliary
manner [23]. This residue is conserved as His264 in
human RNase HI, but is replaced by Glu188 in Bha-
RNase HI. Based on the co-crystal structures of human
RNase H1 and Bha-RNase HI, in which this residue is
conserved as His264 and replaced by Glu188, respec-
tively, with thesubstrateand Mg
2+
, this residue has
been proposed to promotes the product release by per-
turbing the coordination ofthe metal ion A [31,42].
It is noted that a folding motif of RNases H, termed
RNase H-fold, has been found in other proteins with
nuclease or polynucleotidyl transferase activities, such
as integrase [49], DNA transposase [50], RuvC Holli-
day junction resolvase [51], and a PIWI domain of
Argonaute proteins [32,52,53], which is essential for
RNA-induced silencing complex-mediated mRNA
cleavage. Because three or four acidic amino acid resi-
dues also form the active sites of these enzymes, these
enzymes may also share a catalyticmechanism with
RNase H.
Substrate recognition mechanism of
RNase H
The crystal structure of human RNase H1 in complex
with thesubstrateand Mg
2+
highly resembles to that of
Eco-RNase HI free from thesubstrate [42], indicating
that the structure of human RNase HI is not seriously
changed upon substrate binding. According to the
co-crystal structure of human RNase HI with the sub-
strate and Mg
2+
, the RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid binds to the
protein, such that the RNA backbone fits in one groove
containing the active site andthe DNA backbone fits in
the other groove (Fig. 5). These two grooves are sepa-
rated by a ridge, which is composed of highly conserved
Asn151, Asn182 and Gln183 (Asn16, Asn44 and Asn45
Fig. 4. Schematic representation ofthe two-metal-ion catalysis
mechanism proposed for RNase H. The side chains ofthe first
aspartate, second glutamate, third aspartate and fourth aspartate
residues ofthe DEDD motif, which form the active site (metal-bind-
ing site) of RNase H, are shown. They are Asp10, Glu48, Asp70
and Asp134 for Eco-RNase HI, Asp71, Glu109, Asp132, and
Asp192 for Bha-RNase HI, Asp145, Glu186, Asp210 and Asp274
for human RNase H1, and Asp443, Glu478, Asp498 and Asp549 for
HIV-1 RNase H. The fourth aspartate residue is replaced by the
glutamate residue for RNase HIII. The attacking hydroxyl ion that
is coordinated by metal ion A is highlighted in boldface type.
T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya Prokaryotic RNases H
FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1487
for Eco-RNase HI), and interacts with the minor groove
of the RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid.
At the RNA-binding groove, the 2¢-OH groups of
four consecutive ribonucleotides, two on each side
of the scissile phosphate group, contact the side chain
of Glu186 (Glu48 for Eco-RNase HI) andthe back-
bone atoms of Cys148, Ser150, Asn151 and Met212
(Cys13, Gly15, Asn16 and Gln72 for Eco-RNase HI).
Similar contacts are observed between Bha-RNase HI
and the RNA strand ofthe substrate, indicating that
the mechanism for RNA strand recognition is con-
served among various type 1 RNases H. The DNA-
binding groove contains two DNA-binding sites. The
major site is a phosphate-binding pocket, which is
formed by Arg179, Thr181 and Asn240 (Arg41, Thr43
and Asn100 for Eco-RNase HI) and is conserved in
the Bha-RNase HI structure. This site is responsible
for anchoring the B-form DNA. The second site is a
channel formed by Trp221, Trp225 and Ser233 (Trp81,
Trp85 and Ala93 for Eco-RNase HI) in the basic
protrusion. This site is absent in the Bha-RNase HI,
because Bha-RNase HI lacks a basic protrusion. The
RNA strand cannot fit in this groove, because a 2¢-OH
group of RNA clashes with the indole ring of Trp221.
Therefore, these two DNA binding sites probably con-
tribute to the specificity for an RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid.
High resemblance ofthe structures of human
RNase H1 and Eco-RNase HI strongly suggests that
these proteins recognize thesubstrate in a similar
mechanism (Fig. 5). In fact, the mutational studies
suggest that Cys13, Asn16, Gln72, Thr43 and Trp85 of
Eco-RNase HI are important for substrate binding
[54]. Mutational studies also suggest that basic amino
acid residues clustered in the basic protrusion are
important for substratebinding [21]. However, none of
these basic residues makes direct contact with the sub-
strate according to the co-crystal structure of human
RNase H1 with the substrate. It has been suggested
that these basic residues facilitate initial nonspecific
interactions with thesubstrateand promote the forma-
tion of specific enzyme–substrate complexes [42].
It is noted that type 2 RNases H differ from type 1
RNases H in the location of a domain involved in sub-
strate binding. For example, Tko-RNase HII and
Bst-RNase HIII have a substrate-binding domain at
the C- and N-termini, respectively. Both proteins lack
a basic protrusion. Further mutational and structural
studies will be required to understand the substrate
recognition mechanismof these type 2 RNases H.
Multiplicity ofthe RNase H genes in
the single genomes
Single bacterial genomes often contain multiple
RNase H genes. For example, the E. coli genome con-
tains two genes encoding RNases HI and HII [6]. The
B. subtilis genome contains three genes encoding one
type 1 RNase H with an N-terminal HBD-like
domain (RNase HI) [55] and two type 2 RNases H
(RNases HII and HIII) [3]. By contrast, the archaeal
genomes usually contain single RNase HII genes. The
exceptions are the genomes of S. tokodaii [18] and
Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 [17]. These genomes contain
genes encoding RNases HI in addition to those encod-
ing RNases HII. The question arises whether the
number and types ofthe RNase H genes contained in
the single bacterial genomes are correlated with the
evolutionary relationships of their source organisms
determined based on the 16S rRNA sequences. The
answer is no. For example, Shewanella sp. SIB1 and
S. oneidensis MR-1 are c-proteobacteria and evolution-
arily closely related. Nevertheless, the former genome
contains three genes encoding RNase HI, HBD-
RNase HI and RNase HII, whereas the latter contains
only two genes encoding RNases HI and HII [33].
Likewise, T. maritima and A. aeolicus are hypertherm-
ophilic bacteria and evolutionarily closely related.
Nevertheless, the former genome contains the
RNase HI and RNase HII genes, whereas the latter
contains the RNases HII and HIII genes [4]. These
results suggest that RNase H genes have been
Fig. 5. Crystal structure ofthe RNase H–substrate complex. The
crystal structure of Eco-RNase HI (PDB code 2RN2) is superim-
posed onto that ofthe human RNase H1 C-domain complexed with
RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid (PDB code 2QK9). The structures of Eco-RNa-
se HI and human RNase H1 C domain are shown in green and
gold, respectively. The active-site residues are shown as red ball-
and-stick models. The basic protrusion andthe phosphate binding
pocket and DNA-binding channel in the DNA-binding groove are
also indicated.
Prokaryotic RNases H T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya
1488 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS
transferred horizontally among different organisms
during evolutionary processes.
The physiological significance ofthe multiplicity of
RNases H in cells remains to be understood. The
observation that RNase HII ⁄ H2 cleaves dsDNA
containing single ribonucleotide at the DNA–RNA
junction (5¢ side ofthe ribonucleotide) [56,57] suggests
that RNase HII ⁄ H2 is involved in the excision of a
Table 1. Diversity of RNase H in different organisms
a
.
Organisms Gene type
Type 1 RNase H Type 2 RNase H
HI ⁄ H1 without HBD HI ⁄ H1 with HBD HII ⁄ H2 HIII
Bacteria
(Actinobacteria)
Corynebacterium glutamicum A¢B Q79VE
b
Q8NNZ4
Streptomyces coelicolor AA¢B Q9X7R6 Q9L014
b
O69989
(Chlamydiae)
Chlamydophila pneumoniae BC Q9Z962 Q9Z6J1
(Firmicutes)
Bacillus subtilis (A)BC
P54162 O31744 P94541
Bacillus stearothermophilus BC AB073670 AB179782
Bacillus halodurans A¢B Q9KEI9 Q9Z9S0
Streptococcus pneumoniae BC Q04KF4 Q04M70
(Proteobacteria)
Escherichia coli AB P0A7Y4 P10442
Shewanella oneidensis AB Q8EE30 Q8EGG1
Shewanella sp. SIB1 AA¢B Q8RTZ8 AB303852 Q25C12
Shewanella denitrificans AA¢B Q12MM4 Q12R78 Q12NX3
Photobacterium profundum AA¢B Q6LN65 Q6LQZ6 Q6LN38
(Others)
Aquifex aeolicus BC O67768 O67644
Thermotoga maritima A¢B Q9X122 Q9X017
Thermus thermophilus AB P29253
Q5SLU5
Archaea
Methanococcus jannaschii B U67470
Thermococcus kodakaraensis B AB012613
Archaeoglobus fulgidus B AE001062
Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 A¢B Q9HSF6
c
Q9HNR3
Sulfolobus tokodaii AB Q973Z8 Q974Z3
Pyrobaculum aerophilum A¢B Q8ZWG9
d
Q8ZXL6
Eukaryotes
Homo sapiens A¢B O60930 O75792
e
Mus musculus A¢B O70338 Q9CWY8
e
Drosophila melanogaster A¢B O44114 Q9VPP5
e
Caenorhabditis elegans Others Q9XVE6 (rnh-1.3) Q21024 (rnh-1.0) Q9U6P6
e
Q09633 (rnh-1.1)
Q23676 (rnh-1.2)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae A¢B Q04740 P53942
e
Candida albicans Others Q5AC61 (RNH11) Q5AGX6
e
Q5ABY6 (RNH12)
Q5ABY8 (RNH13)
Retrovirus
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 A U53871
f
Moloney murine leukemia virus A 0711245A
f
Rous sarcoma virus A AF052428
f
a
The accession numbers for RNases HI ⁄ H1 with and without HBD, RNases HII ⁄ H2, and RNases HIII are shown. Only the representative
members of organisms with fifferent combination ofthe RNase H genes are listed. The genes A, A¢, B, and C represent those encoding
RNases HI ⁄ H1 without HBD, RNases HI ⁄ H1 with HBD, RNases HII ⁄ H2, and RNases HIII, respectively. The accession numbers for the pro-
teins which do not exhibit RNase H activity or exhibits other activities are underlined.
b
N-terminal domain of bi-functional enzyme.
c
It has
an N-terminal extension with little sequence similarity to HBD and TBP.
d
It has a C-terminal extension.
e
Catalytic subunit of a heterotrimer.
f
C-terminal domain of reverse transcriptase.
T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya Prokaryotic RNases H
FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1489
single ribonucleotide misincorporated into DNA.
RNase HI ⁄ H1 is not involved in this process because
it does not cleave this substrate. However, all RNases H
endonucleolytically cleave RNA ⁄ DNA hybrids in a
nonspecific manner. The T. thermophilus RNase HII
orthologue does not exhibit RNase H activity but
cleaves the RNA–DNA junction, and is therefore
designated as junction ribonuclease [58].
Functional similarities between type 1 and type 2
RNases H may suggest that a physiological signifi-
cance ofthe multiplicity ofthe RNase H genes in a
single genome is the protection of cells from a lethal
mutation in the RNase H gene. The E. coli [59] and
B. subtilis [55] mutants that lack all RNase H genes
are not lethal, but show a temperature-sensitive growth
phenotype. These results indicate that RNase H activ-
ity is dispensable for the growth of these micro-organ-
isms, but is involved in important cellular processes.
We previously showed that two RNases H greatly dif-
fer in specific activities when they are simultaneously
produced in single cells and are therefore classified into
high- and low-activity type RNases H [37]. These types
are not correlated with the RNase H families. These
results suggest that bacteria evolve such that functional
redundancies ofthe RNase H genes are eliminated. As
mentioned earlier, RNases H have been transferred
horizontally among different organisms. An RNase H
transferred horizontally may provide a selective advan-
tage to recipients. However, once a cell that already
has an RNase H receives a second RNase H by lateral
gene transfer, the responsibilities can be shared in ways
that would not necessarily be repeated following other
occurrences of transfer. In some instances, the incom-
ing RNase H may retain the selective traits, whereas in
others, the resident and incoming RNase H may swap
some or all of their properties. Because RNases HI
and HII represent high-activity type RNases H in
E. coli and Shewanella sp. SIB1, respectively, these
RNases H may retain the selective traits. The phylo-
genetic and statistical analyses using 353 prokaryotic
genomes also suggest that functional redundancy
contributes to the exclusion or weakening of redundant
genes from the genome [60].
It is noted that not only theprokaryotic genomes,
but also the eukaryotic genomes usually contain
multiple RNase H genes. This minireview is followed
others which focus on RNases H from eukaryotes
and retroviruses. Table 1 summarizes large diversities
of RNases H in different organisms. These organisms
are classified into several types based on differences
in the combination ofthe RNase H genes. Appar-
ently, these types are not correlated with the species
of organisms.
Perspectives
Prokaryotic RNases H vary greatly in domain struc-
tures andsubstrate specificities. For example,
HBD-RNases HI and RNases HIII contain a substrate-
binding domain at the N-termini. Tko-RNase HII and
Eco-RNase HI contain it at the C-terminus and middle
of the molecule, respectively. Sto-RNase HI contains
none of these domains. Likewise, Sto-RNase HI cleaves
the RNA strand of not only the RNA⁄ DNA hybrid, but
also the RNA ⁄ RNA duplex. RNase HII can cleave a
DNA ⁄ DNA duplex containing a single ribonucleotide
at the DNA–RNA junction, whereas RNase HI and
RNase HIII cannot. Sto-RNase HI and Halo-
RNase HI can cleave a RNA–DNA junction, although
other RNases H cannot. The RNase HII orthologue
from T. thermophilus can also cleave this junction, but
cannot cleave a RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid. Understanding the
substrate recognition mechanismof these RNases H
with diverged structures and functions will allow us to
answer the fundamental question how RNase H
acquires its specificity for RNA ⁄ DNA hybrids.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs H. Chon, D. J. You, H. Matsumura,
Y. Koga and K. Takano, for helpful discussions.
References
1 Kogoma T & Foster PL (1998) Physiological functions
of E. coli RNase HI. In Ribonucleases H (Crouch RJ &
Toulme JJ, eds), pp. 39–66. INSERM, Paris.
2 Drolet M (2006) Growth inhibition mediated by excess
negative supercoiling: the interplay between transcrip-
tion elongation, R-loop formation and DNA topology.
Mol Microbiol 59, 723–730.
3 Ohtani N, Haruki M, Morikawa M, Crouch RJ, Itaya
M & Kanaya S (1999) Identification ofthe genes
encoding Mn
2+
-dependent RNase HII and Mg
2+
-
dependent RNase HIII from Bacillus subtilis: classifica-
tion of RNases H into three families. Biochemistry 38,
605–618.
4 Ohtani N, Haruki M, Morikawa M & Kanaya S (1999)
Molecular diversities of RNases H. J Biosci Bioeng 88,
12–19.
5 Kanaya S & Crouch RJ (1983) DNA sequence of the
gene coding for Escherichia coli ribonuclease H. J Biol
Chem 258, 1276–1281.
6 Itaya M (1990) Isolation and characterization of a sec-
ond RNase H (RNase HII) of Escherichia coli K-12
encoded by the rnhB gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87,
8587–8591.
Prokaryotic RNases H T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya
1490 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS
7 Liang R, Liu X, Pei D & Liu J (2007) Biochemical char-
acterization and functional complementation of ribo-
nuclease HII andribonuclease HIII from Chlamydophila
pneumoniae AR39. Microbiology 153, 787–793.
8 Hou J, Liu X, Pei D & Liu J (2007) RNase HII from
Chlamydia pneumoniae discriminates mismatches incor-
poration into DNA-rN1-DNA ⁄ DNA duplexes. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 356, 988–992.
9 Chon H, Matsumura H, Koga Y, Takano K & Kanaya
S (2005) Crystal structure and structure-based muta-
tional analyses of RNase HIII from Bacillus stearother-
mophilus: a new type 2 RNase H with TBP-like
substrate-binding domain at the N-terminus. J Mol Biol
356, 165–178.
10 Chon H, Nakano R, Ohtani N, Haruki M, Takano K,
Morikawa M & Kanaya S (2004) Gene cloning and bio-
chemical characterizations of a thermostable ribonucle-
ase HIII from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Biosci
Biotechnol Biochem 68, 2138–2147.
11 Lai L, Yokota H, Hung LW, Kim R & Kim SH (2000)
Crystal structure of archaeal RNase HII: a homologue
of human major RNase H. Structure 8, 897–904.
12 Muroya A, Tsuchiya D, Ishikawa M, Haruki M, Mor-
ikawa M, Kanaya S & Morikawa K (2001) Catalytic
center of an archaeal type 2 Ribonuclease H as revealed
by X-ray crystallographic and mutational analyses.
Protein Sci 10, 707–714.
13 Chapados BR, Chai Q, Hosfield DJ, Shen B & Tainer
JA (2001) Structural biochemistry of a type 2 RNase H:
RNA primer recognition and removal during DNA
replication. J Mol Biol 307, 541–556.
14 Kim Y, Geiger JH, Hahn S & Sigler PB (1993) Crystal
structure of a yeast TBP ⁄ TATA-box complex. Nature
365, 512–520.
15 Nikolov DB, Chen H, Halay ED, Hoffman A, Roeder
RG & Burley SK (1996) Crystal structure of a human
TATA box-binding protein ⁄ TATA element complex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 4862–4867.
16 Kosa PF, Ghosh G, DeDecker BS & Sigler PB (1997)
The 2.1-A
˚
crystal structure of an archaeal preinitiation
complex: TATA-box-binding protein ⁄ transcription
factor (II)B core ⁄ TATA-box. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94, 6042–6047.
17 Ohtani N, Yanagawa H, Tomita M & Itaya M (2004)
Identification ofthe first archaeal type 1 RNase H gene
from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1: archaeal RNase HI
can cleave an RNA–DNA junction. Biochem J 381,
795–802.
18 Ohtani N, Yanagawa H, Tomita M & Itaya M (2004)
Cleavage of double-stranded RNA by RNase HI from
a thermoacidophilic archaeon, Sulfolobus tokodaii 7.
Nucleic Acids Res 32, 5809–5819.
19 Ohtani N, Saito N, Tomita M, Itaya M & Itoh A
(2005) The SCO2299 gene from Streptomyces coelicolor
A3(2) encodes a bifunctional enzyme consisting of an
RNase H domain and an acid phosphatase domain.
FEBS J 272, 2828–2837.
20 Hirasawa T, Kumagai Y, Nagai K & Wachi M (2003)
A Corynebacterium glutamicum rnhA recG double
mutant showing lysozyme-sensitivity, temperature-sensi-
tive growth, and UV-sensitivity. Biosci Biotechnol Bio-
chem 67, 2416–2424.
21 Kanaya S, Katsuda-Nakai C & Ikehara M (1991)
Importance ofthe positive charge cluster in Escherichi-
a coli ribonuclease HI for the effective bindingof the
substrate. J Biol Chem 266, 11621–11627.
22 Haruki M, Noguchi E, Kanaya S & Crouch RJ (1997)
Kinetic and stoichiometric analysis for thebinding of
Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI to RNA–DNA hybrids
using surface plasmon resonance. J Biol Chem 272,
22015–22022.
23 Oda Y, Yoshida M & Kanaya S (1993) Role of histi-
dine 124 in thecatalytic function ofribonuclease HI
from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 268, 88–92.
24 Gotte M, Maier G, Onori AM, Cellai L, Wainberg MA
& Heumann H (1999) Temporal coordination between
initiation of HIV(+)-strand DNA synthesis and primer
removal. J Biol Chem 274, 11159–11169.
25 Hughes SH, Arnold E & Hostomsky Z (1998) RNase H of
retroviral reverse transcriptases. In Ribonucleases H
(Crouch RJ & Toulme JJ, eds), pp. 195–224. INSERM,
Paris.
26 You D-J, Chon H, Koga Y, Takano K & Kanaya S
(2007) Crystal structure of type 1 RNase H from hyper-
thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii: role of
Arg118 and C-terminal anchoring. Biochemistry 46,
11494–11503.
27 Katayanagi K, Miyagawa M, Matsushima M, Ishikawa
M, Kanaya S, Ikehara M, Matsuzaki T & Morikawa K
(1990) Three-dimensional structure ofribonuclease H
from E. coli. Nature 347, 306–309.
28 Yang W, Hendrickson WA, Crouch RJ & Satow Y
(1990) Structure ofribonuclease H phased at 2 A
˚
reso-
lution by MAD analysis ofthe selenomethionyl protein.
Science 249, 1398–1405.
29 Davies JF, Hostomska Z, Hostomsky Z, Jordan SR &
Matthews DA (1991) Crystal structure ofthe ribonucle-
ase H domain of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Science
252, 88–95.
30 Kohlstaedt LA, Wang J, Friedman JM, Rice PA &
Steitz TA (1992) Crystal structure at 3.5 A
˚
resolution of
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an inhibi-
tor. Science 256, 1783–1790.
31 Nowotny M, Gaidamakov SA, Crouch RJ & Yang W
(2005) Crystal structures of RNase H bound to an
RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid: substrate specificity and metal-
dependent catalysis. Cell 121, 1005–1016.
32 Yuan YR, Pei Y, Ma JB, Kuryavyi V, Zhadina M,
Meister G, Chen HY, Dauter Z, Tuschl T & Patel DJ
(2005) Crystal structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute, a
T. Tadokoro and S. Kanaya Prokaryotic RNases H
FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1491
[...]... Morikawa K (1993) Crystal structure ofribonuclease HI from Thermus ˚ thermophilus HB8 refined at 2.8 A resolution J Mol Biol 230, 529–542 Tadokoro T, You D-J, Chon H, Matsumura H, Koga Y, Takano K & Kanaya S (2007) Structural, thermodynamic, and mutational analyses of a psychrotrophic RNase HI Biochemistry 46, 7460–7468 Das D & Georgiadis MM (2004) The crystal structure ofthe monomeric reverse transcriptase... structure ofthecatalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase: similarity to other polynucleotidyl transferases Science 266, 1981– 1986 Rice P & Mizuuchi K (1995) Structure ofthe bacteriophage Mu transposase core: a common structural motif for DNA transposition and retroviral integration Cell 82, 209–220 Ariyoshi M, Vassylyev DG, Iwasaki H, Nakamura H, Shinagawa H & Morikawa K (1994) Atomic structure ofthe RuvC... bound in the active site J Biol Chem 276, 7266–7271 Nowotny M & Yang W (2006) Stepwise analyses of metal ions in RNase H catalysis from substrate destabilization to product release EMBO J 25, 1924– 1933 Yang W, Lee JY & Nowotny M (2006) Making and breaking nucleic acids: two-Mg2 + -ion catalysis andsubstrate specificity Mol Cell 22, 5–13 Bastock JA, Webb M & Grasby JA (2007) The pHdependence ofthe Escherichia... Yoshikawa H (2007) Reassessment ofthe in vivo functions of DNA polymerase I and RNase H in bacterial cell growth J Bacteriol 189, 8575–8583 Haruki M, Tsunaka Y, Morikawa M & Kanaya S (2002) Cleavage of a DNA–RNA–DNA ⁄ DNA chimeric substrate containing single ribonucleotide at the DNA– RNA junction with prokaryotic RNases HII FEBS Lett 531, 204–208 Rydberg B & Game J (2002) Excision of misincorporated ribonucleotides... A resolution: proof for a single Mg2 + -binding site Proteins 17, 337–346 Tsunaka Y, Takano K, Matsumura H, Yamagata Y & Kanaya S (2005) Identification of single Mn2 + binding sites in the mutant proteins of E coli RNase HI at 1492 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 Glu48 and ⁄ or Asp134 by X-ray crystallography J Mol Biol 345, 1171–1183 Goedken ER & Marqusee S (2001) Co-crystal of Escherichia coli.. .Prokaryotic RNases H 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 T Tadokoro and S Kanaya site-specific DNA-guided endoribonuclease, provides insights into RISC-mediated mRNA cleavage Mol Cell 19, 405–419 Tadokoro T, Chon H, Koga Y, Takano K & Kanaya S (2007) Identification ofthe gene encoding a Type 1 RNase H with an N-terminal double-stranded RNA binding domain from a psychrotrophic... of misincorporated ribonucleotides in DNA by RNase H (type 2) and FEN-1 in cell-free extracts Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 16654–16659 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS T Tadokoro and S Kanaya 58 Ohtani N, Tomita M & Itaya M (2008) Junction ribonuclease: ribonuclease HII ortholog from Thermus thermophilus HB8 prefers RNA–DNA junction to RNA ⁄ DNA heteroduplex... Crouch RJ, Tanaka T & Kondo K (1999) Isolation of RNase H genes that are Prokaryotic RNases H essential for growth of Bacillus subtilis 168 J Bacteriol 181, 2118–2123 60 Kochiwa H, Tomita M & Kanai A (2007) Evolution ofribonuclease H genes in prokaryotes to avoid inheritance of redundant genes BMC Evol Biol 7, 128 FEBS Journal 276 (2009) 1482–1493 ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 FEBS 1493... Hendrickson WA & Goff SP (2006) Crystal structure ofthe moloney murine leukemia virus RNase H domain J Virol 80, 8379–8389 Nowotny M, Gaidamakov SA, Ghirlando R, Cerritelli SM, Crouch RJ & Yang W (2007) Structure of human RNase H1 complexed with an RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid: insight into HIV reverse transcription Mol Cell 28, 264–276 Katayanagi K, Okumura M & Morikawa K (1993) Crystal structure of Escherichia... bacterium FEBS J 274, 3715–3727 Cerritelli SM, Fedoroff OY, Reid BR & Crouch RJ (1998) A common 40 amino acid motif in eukaryotic RNases H1 and caulimovirus ORF VI proteins binds to duplex RNAs Nucleic Acid Res 26, 1834– 1840 Nowotny M, Cerritelli SM, Ghirlando R, Gaidamakov SA, Crouch RJ & Yang W (2008) Specific recognition of RNA ⁄ DNA hybrid and enhancement of human RNase H1 activity by HBD EMBO J 27, 1172–1181 . MINIREVIEW Ribonuclease H: molecular diversities, substrate binding domains, and catalytic mechanism of the prokaryotic enzymes Takashi Tadokoro and Shigenori Kanaya Department of Material and Life. sites of these enzymes, these enzymes may also share a catalytic mechanism with RNase H. Substrate recognition mechanism of RNase H The crystal structure of human RNase H1 in complex with the substrate. H with respect to their biochemical properties and structures, and elucidating catalytic mechanism and substrate recognition mechanism of RNase H. We review the results of these studies. Abbreviations Afu,