Báo cáo khoa học: Characterization of mutations in crucial residues around the Qo binding site of the cytochrome bc1 complex from Paracoccus denitrificans pdf
Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 13 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
13
Dung lượng
390,89 KB
Nội dung
Characterizationofmutationsincrucialresidues around
the Q
o
binding siteofthecytochrome bc
1
complex from
Paracoccus denitrificans
Thomas Kleinschroth
1
, Oliver Anderka
1
, Michaela Ritter
2
, Andreas Stocker
1,2
, Thomas A. Link
2
,
Bernd Ludwig
1
and Petra Hellwig
3
1 Institut fu
¨
r Biochemie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universita
¨
t, Molekulare Genetik, Biozentrum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2 Institut fu
¨
r Biophysik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universita
¨
t, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3 Institut de Chimie, UMR 7177 CNRS, Laboratoire de Spectroscopie Vibrationnelle et Electrochimie des Biomole
´
cules, Universite
´
Louis
Pasteur, Strasbourg, France
Ubiquinol–cytochrome c oxidoreductase (cytochrome
bc
1
complex; complex III) [1] is a fundamental compo-
nent ofthe respiratory electron transfer chains located
in the inner mitochondrial or bacterial cytoplasmic
membrane. As a minimum requirement, all bc
1
com-
plexes contain three catalytic subunits: cytochrome c
1
Keywords
bc
1
complex; FTIR spectroscopy;
Paracoccus denitrificans; proton and
electron transfer; quinones
Correspondence
P. Hellwig, Institut de Chimie, UMR 7177
CNRS, Laboratoire de Spectroscopie
Vibrationnelle et Electrochimie des
Biomole
´
cules, Universite
´
Louis Pasteur 4,
rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France
Fax: +33 390 241431
Tel: +33 390 241273
E-mail: hellwig@chimie.u-strasbg.fr
(Received 31 March 2008, revised 14 June
2008, accepted 28 July 2008)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06611.x
The protonation state ofresiduesaroundthe Q
o
binding siteofthe cyto-
chrome bc
1
complex fromParacoccusdenitrificans and their interaction
with bound quinone(s) was studied by a combined electrochemical and
FTIR difference spectroscopic approach. Site-directed mutationsof two
groups of conserved residues were investigated: (a) acidic side chains
located close to the surface and thought to participate in a water chain
leading up to the heme b
L
edge, and (b) residues located inthe vicinity of
this site. Interestingly, most ofthe mutants retain a high degree of catalytic
activity. E295Q, E81Q and Y297F showed reduced stigmatellin affinity. On
the basis of electrochemically induced FTIR difference spectra, we suggest
that E295 and D278 are protonated inthe oxidized form or that their
mutation perturbs protonated residues. Mutations Y302, Y297, E81 and
E295, directly perturb signals fromthe oxidized quinone and ofthe protein
backbone. By monitoring the interaction with the inhibitor stigmatellin for
the wild-type enzyme at various redox states, interactions ofthe bound
stigmatellin with amino acid side chains such as protonated acidic residues
and the backbone were observed, as well as difference signals arising from
the redox active inhibitor itself and the replaced quinone. The infrared
difference spectra ofthe above Q
o
site mutationsinthe presence of stigma-
tellin confirm the previously established role of E295 as a direct interaction
partner inthe enzyme from P. denitrificans as well. The protonated residue
E295 is proposed to change the hydrogen-bonding environment upon
stigmatellin bindinginthe oxidized form, and is deprotonated in the
reduced form. Oftheresidues located close to the surface, D278 remains
protonated and unperturbed inthe oxidized form but its frequency shifts in
the reduced form. The mechanistic implications of our observations are
discussed, together with previous inhibitor binding data, and referred to
the published X-ray structures.
Abbreviations
bc
1
complex, ubihydroquinone–cytochrome c oxidoreductase; b
H,
high-potential b-type heme; b
L,
low-potential b-type heme; DDM, n-dodecyl
b-
D-maltoside; Q
i,
ubiquinone reduction site; Q
o,
ubiquinol oxidation site.
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4773
with covalently bound c-type heme, cytochrome b with
two b-type hemes (b
L
and b
H
), and the Rieske iron sul-
fur protein with a [2Fe–2S] cluster. Crystal structures
of several mitochondrial complexes that contain addi-
tional subunits have been reported [2–5]. Recently, a
new crystal structure for a bacterial complex has been
solved [6].
The enzyme couples the electron transfer from
ubiquinol to cytochrome c to the translocation of pro-
tons across the membrane. Both bacterial and mito-
chondrial bc
1
complexes follow the same catalytic
mechanism, the so-called Q-cycle [7–9], which relies on
two separate binding sites for quinones, Q
o
and Q
i
.
The Q
o
site is located close to heme b
L
and the [2Fe–
2S] cluster, and the Q
i
site is close to heme b
H
on the
opposite side ofthe membrane. Although this mech-
anism is generally accepted, not all aspects of the
quinol ⁄ quinone binding and redox reaction are yet
fully understood at the molecular level, and various
models for the quinol oxidation mechanism at the Q
o
site have been discussed [10–15].
Inhibitors are an important tool for analysis of the
molecular mechanism ofthe bc
1
complex, and have
been extensively used to characterize the various qui-
none binding sites [16]. Depending on their binding
properties, Q
o
and Q
i
site-specific inhibitors may be
distinguished. Stigmatellin binds at the Q
o
site and
interacts with the Rieske protein and cytochrome b,
and also influences the heme b
L
spectral properties.
The crystal structure ofthe bc
1
complex with stigma-
tellin bound at the Q
o
site [2] shows tight and specific
binding ofthe inhibitor. The position ofthe conju-
gated trienes is stabilized by several van der Waals
interactions with cytochrome b residues. The chromone
headgroup is oriented by numerous nonpolar and a
few polar interactions, including a hydrogen bond
from the carbonyl group (4-C = O) to His155 (His188
in yeast), one ofthe [2Fe–2S] cluster ligands of the
Rieske protein, which is thereby fixed in a cyto-
chrome b docking position [2] (unless otherwise indi-
cated, numbering ofthe amino acids corresponds to
the Paracoccusdenitrificans bc
1
complex). On the heme
b
L
facing side ofthe inhibitor, the 8-hydroxy group is
within hydrogen-bonding distance ofthe side chain of
cytochrome b residue Glu295 (272 in yeast). Bound
stigmatellin is thought to mimic an intermediate of
ubiquinol oxidation [2]. Based on published structures
and biochemical characterizationof variants, Glu295
has been proposed to be part ofthe proton exit path-
way for ubiquinol oxidation [2,16].
The cytochrome bc
1
complex of P. denitrificans
represents a small bacterial version ofthe mitochon-
drial enzyme, lacking any additional subunits. Its 3D
structure is not yet known; however, due to extensive
sequence identity, mostly inthecytochrome b and
Rieske subunits, a similar architecture for the three
catalytic subunits between the mitochondrial and the
bacterial complex is assumed. In order to probe poten-
tial similarities and dissimilarities, we have investigated
the Q
o
site ofthe bc
1
complex from P. denitrificans by
a combination of site-directed mutagenesis, protein
electrochemistry and FTIR difference spectroscopy.
Reaction-induced FTIR spectroscopy is a method that
is suitable for the study ofthe protonation state of
acidic residues or quinone binding as described previ-
ously for several membrane proteins including bc
1
com-
plexes [17–22]. Identification of interaction partners for
stigmatellin bindinginthe oxidized and reduced forms
as well as the protonation state oftheresidues involved
in proton transfer are described and discussed in the
light of studies on bc
1
complexes from other organisms.
The mutated residues are highlighted in Fig. 1.
Results
Site-directed mutationsinthe Q
o
binding site
Mutations in conserved positions ofcytochrome b at
the Q
o
site were constructed (Fig. 1). The three subun-
its ofthe P. denitrificans bc
1
complex are expressed in
all mutants and assembled into a stable complex that
corresponds to the wild-type enzyme as determined
by SDS–PAGE and Western blot analysis. After
Fig. 1. 3D representation ofthe Q
o
site environment ofthe cyto-
chrome bc
1
complex based on the structure obtained from Rhodob-
acter sphaeroides [46]. Cytochrome c
1
is shown in blue,
cytochrome b in red, and the Rieske protein in green. The iron–sul-
fur cluster is shown in purple and yellow, and the bound inhibitor
stigmatellin is shown in turquoise. Heme is shown in light purple,
and the heme iron is shown in purple. Mutationsof conserved
amino acids introduced in seven positions ofthe P. denitrificans
enzyme are indicated as follows: 1, D71 ⁄ 86 (mitochondrial ⁄ bacte-
rial complex); 2, E66 ⁄ 81; 3, D255 ⁄ 278; 4, Y132 ⁄ 147; 5, E272 ⁄ 295;
6, Y274 ⁄ 297; 7, Y279 ⁄ 302.
Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site T. Kleinschroth et al.
4774 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
solubilization, thecomplex was purified using a
DEAE–Sepharose column, and thecytochrome bc
1
eluted as a single peak. Samples were > 95% pure as
determined by silver staining. The ubiquinol–cyto-
chrome c oxidoreductase activities ofthe purified com-
plexes were measured in buffer containing n-dodecyl
b-d-maltoside and compared to that ofthe wild-type
enzyme (Table 1).
The activities ofthe E81Q, D278N, Y297F and
Y302F mutant enzymes ranged from 90% to 120% of
that ofthe wild-type enzyme. Significantly reduced
activity (66 and 55%) was observed for the D86N and
Y147F mutant enzymes. A drastic reduction in turn-
over was seen for the E295Q mutation, with only 10%
residual activity. The activity ofthe wild-type and all
mutant complexes is strongly inhibited to < 1% of
wild-type activity by the addition of 2 lm ofthe inhib-
itor stigmatellin. IC
50
values, defined as the inflection
point ofthe curve, are listed in Table 1. Interestingly
the E81Q mutant enzyme showed both a slightly
increased turnover and also an increased IC
50
value. A
distinct increase ofthe IC
50
value was observed for the
E295Q and Y147F mutant enzymes.
FTIR difference spectra ofmutationsinthe Q
o
binding site
Figure 2 shows an overview ofthe oxidized-minus-
reduced FTIR difference spectra ofthe E295Q,
D278N, E81Q and D86N mutant enzymes in compari-
son with wild-type. The redox-induced FTIR difference
spectra include contributions from reorganization of
the cofactors, heme b
L
, b
H
and c
1
, the bound quinones,
individual amino acids, the backbone and coupled pro-
tonation reactions. All purified mutants retained their
bound quinones, as their spectra include the character-
istic contributions that dominate the overall spectrum
of the P. denitrificans bc
1
complex, such as the typical
contribution ofthe methoxy side chain at 1264 cm
)1
,
as detailed below. The number of molecules of quinone
per bc
1
monomer has been reported as 2.6–3.3 for this
type of preparation [19].
Contribution of acidic side chains
For the redox-induced FTIR difference spectra of the
E295Q, D278N and D86N mutant enzymes, the signals
in the spectral region characteristic for protonated
Table 1. Enzymatic activities and IC
50
values for stigmatellin of
purified cytochrome bc
1
mutants at the Q
o
quinone binding site.
Values are the means of triplicate measurements.
Enzyme ⁄ mutant
Percentage
of the activity
in wild-type
IC
50
fold
increase
over wild-type
Wild-type 100
a
1
b
E81Q 120 3.5
D86N 66 1.4
D278N 105 1.3
E295Q 10 4.6
Y147F 55 5.2
Y297F 90 2.0
Y302F 95 2.1
a
100% indicates a turnover number of 327 s
)1
based on one cyto-
chrome b (per monomer).
b
1 indicates an IC
50
value for the wild-
type of 131 ± 7 n
M under our experimental conditions.
1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200
1455
1559
1474
1560
Δ Abs
0.001
1656
1654
1746 1746
1726
1724
1656
1656
1570
1724
1694
1628
1612
1561
1540
1289
1432
1496
1470
1264
1658
1746
WT
E295Q
D278N
E81Q
D86N
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
1800 1750
D278N
(cm
–1
)
E295Q
E81Q
1743
Fig. 2. Overview ofthe oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR difference
spectra of wild-type and acidic side-chain mutant cytochrome bc
1
complexes from P. denitrificans obtained for a change in potential
from )0.292 to +0.708 V. The inset shows double difference spec-
tra obtained by subtracting the wild-type red-ox difference spec-
trum from that of each mutant.
T. Kleinschroth et al. Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4775
acidic residues were perturbed. The decrease is shown
in the inset to Fig. 2, showing double difference spec-
tra obtained by subtracting the spectrum of the
E295Q, D278N and E81Q variants from that of the
wild-type. Both D278N and E295Q show a decrease in
the mode at 1746 cm
)1
associated with the oxidized
form, without a complete loss ofthe signal (see Fig. 4
below), so both residues may contribute to this signal
or indirectly influence the contributing C = O group.
In the case ofthe D86N mutant enzyme, the negative
mode at 1724 cm
)1
is decreased. In contrast, the E81Q
mutation does not induce changes in this region. In
the spectral range that includes the signals for deproto-
nated acidic side chains [23–27], clear variations occur
at 1560 cm
)1
for E295Q, at 1563 cm
)1
for D86N and
at 1559 cm
)1
for D278N, at positions typical for the
d(COO
)
)
as
vibrational mode. The d(COO
)
)
s
vibra-
tional mode can be tentatively assigned to the shifts
observed between 1455 and 1423 cm
)1
. These shifts
may be attributed to the acidic residues that are per-
turbed due to themutations or alternatively loss of
interaction with the heme propionates fromthe nearby
heme b.
Contributions from tyrosine side chains
Figure 3 gives an overview on the oxidized-minus-
reduced FTIR difference spectra ofthe Y147F, Y297F
and Y302F mutant enzymes in comparison with wild-
type. The wild-type spectrum shows contributions in
the spectral range around 1516 and 1500 cm
)1
that are
characteristic of tyrosine side chains. In previously
reported model spectra ofthe protonated tyrosine, the
signal at approximately 1518 cm
)1
was attributed to
the m
19
(CC) ring mode. At 1249 cm
)1
, a signal com-
posed ofthe m
7’a
(CO) vibration and the d(COH) vibra-
tion is expected, and the position is sensitive to the
hydrogen-bonding environment [23,25,28,29]. For
deprotonated tyrosine in solution, the m
8a
⁄
8b
(CC) ring
mode was identified at 1560 cm
)1
and the m
19
(CC) ring
mode at 1499 cm
)1
, thus reflecting the sensitivity of
the ring modes to the protonation state ofthe phenyl
group. The m
7’a
(CO) mode was present at 1269 cm
)1
.
In the difference spectra shown in Fig. 3, changes
were only observed for the Y302F and the Y297F
mutant enzymes. These shifts are rather small as com-
pared to previously published absorption coefficients
for these modes [23,25,28,29]. Inthe spectra of the
Y302F mutation, the signal at 1666 cm
)1
is absent.
This spectral range typically includes contributions
from the m(C = O) mode ofthe backbone or proton-
ated heme propionates. Additionally, we suggest the
perturbation of arginine side chains. This is supported
by model compound studies that indicated that vibra-
tional modes are expected at 1673 cm
)1
for m(C = N),
1633 cm
)1
for d(NH
3
+
)
as
and 1522 cm
)1
for d(NH
3
+
)
s
[23,25]. For the Y302 mutant, perturbations were seen
at 1666, 1626 and 1522 cm
)1
.
Contributions ofthe quinones and the protein
backbone
In redox-induced FTIR difference spectra of quinones
in solution, the positive signals between 1670 and
1540 cm
)1
, as well as at 1610, 1288, 1264 and
1204 cm
)1
, correlate with the neutral quinone, while
the negative signals at 1490, 1470, 1432 and 1388 cm
)1
represent the reduced and protonated quinol form. The
mode between 1670 and 1640 cm
)1
was previously
assigned to the C = O vibration ofthe quinone, and
the mode at 1610 cm
)1
was attributed to the C = C
vibration [32–34]. The C–O modes ofthe methoxy
groups contribute to the signals at 1288 and 1264 cm
)1
.
Figure 4 shows the spectra after hydrogen ⁄ deuterium
(H ⁄ D) exchange, and an enlarged view for the wild-type,
E295Q and D278N mutant enzymes before the exchange.
1522
1626
1666
1264
1516
1575
1561
1561
1520
1516
1507
1507
Δ
Abs
1540
1507
1540
1540
1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200
1658
1644
1644
1644
1658
1656
1746 1746
1746
1644
1550
1508
1498
1520
1630
1658
1746
0.001
wt
Y297F
Y302F
Y147F
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
Fig. 3. Overview ofthe oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR difference
spectra of wild-type and tyrosine side-chain mutant cytochrome bc
1
complexes from P. denitrificans obtained for a change in potential
from )0.292 to +0.708 V.
Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site T. Kleinschroth et al.
4776 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
The effect of H ⁄ D exchange has been described pre-
viously [19]. Interestingly, the strong positive feature
around 1655 cm
)1
, previously tentatively assigned to
the m(C = O) mode of neutral, fully oxidized quinones,
is perturbed in most ofthe mutants. The position of
this vibration is dependent on hydrogen bonding to the
C = O group, as previously found in quinone spectra
of other enzymes [32–34]. The most prominent shift
occurs for the E295Q mutation, for which an increase
of the shoulder at 1646 cm
)1
is observed (Figs 2 and 4,
insets), indicating that at least one ofthe involved
quinones experiences weaker hydrogen bonding. Simi-
larly, the signal at 1639 cm
)1
is significantly increased
in the H ⁄ D-exchanged sample. We note, however, that
these changes may also originate from contributions of
the protein backbone, varied due to the mutations.
Another potential explanation for the variation in
signal intensity seen for the various mutants might be
the differences in quinone content; however, other
characteristic signals ofthe quinone, such as the
mode at 1264 cm
)1
(1266 cm
)1
in the H ⁄ D-exchanged
sample) remain unperturbed (Fig. 3). As an alternative
explanation for the loss of signal intensity, e.g. for the
E81Q mutation, the dependence ofthe m(C = O) signal
for up to 50% of its intensity on the orientation of the
methoxy side chains in relation to the position of the
quinone ring should be noted, as previously reported
[36]. The change in intensity was confirmed in the
H ⁄ D-exchanged sample, for which the signals at 1655
and 1639 cm
)1
both strongly decrease due to the muta-
tion. This may indicate a change ofthe quinone envi-
ronment in some ofthe mutants. In addition, we note
some broadening ofthe m(C = O) signals, for example
in the case ofthe E295Q mutation. This may be due to
the loss of a hydrogen-bonding partner, allowing
greater rotational freedom ofthe C = O groups. In
order to differentiate between the effects on the protein
backbone and on the quinones, further experiments on
isotopically labeled quinones are necessary.
Wild-type FTIR difference spectra inthe presence
of stigmatellin
Figure 5 shows the oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR
difference spectra ofthe wild-type cytochrome bc
1
complex from P. denitrificans obtained for a potential
step from )0.292 to +0.708 V, in comparison with
spectra obtained inthe presence of a 2- or 10-fold
molar excess of stigmatellin.
Upon bindingof stigmatellin, shifts reflecting the
changes within thebindingsite and the immediate envi-
ronment are expected, together with signals for the
inhibitor itself, which undergoes a redox reaction
[18,37]. The spectra obtained with a 10-fold excess of
stigmatellin help to identify the signals originating from
the oxidized and reduced inhibitor; signals for the inhib-
itor were observed at 1704, 1670 and 1252 cm
)1
, for the
oxidized form and several features between 1598 and
1346 cm
)1
were observed for the reduced form. These
signals are in line with the spectra identified using iso-
tope-labeled derivatives characterized inthe presence of
the bc
1
complex from yeast [18]. For interpretation of
the effects of inhibitor binding, the oxidized-minus-
reduced FTIR difference spectra inthe presence of a
2-fold excess of stigmatellin are discussed below,
enabling us to focus solely on contributions from the
1750 16501700 1600
D278N
E295Q
WT
1724
1726
1751
1746
1724
1693
1612
1644
1658
1746
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
1800
1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200
0.001
Δ
Abs
D86N
E81Q
D278N
E295Q
WT
1448
1639
1560
1540
1266
1692
1448
1655
1657
1655
1635
1452
1448
1639
1639
1743
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
Fig. 4. Overview ofthe oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR difference
spectra of wild-type and mutant cytochrome bc
1
complexes from
P. denitrificans, with samples equilibrated in D
2
O buffer. The inset
shows an enlarged view ofthe spectral region characteristic of pro-
tonated acidic residues as well as perturbations on the m(C = O)
vibrational mode of ubiquinone and the protein backbone for wild-
type and the D278N and E295A mutant enzymes equilibrated in
H
2
O buffer.
T. Kleinschroth et al. Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4777
inhibited protein and the bound inhibitor, but not from
the unbound inhibitor. Double difference spectra were
obtained by subtracting wild-type spectra from those
obtained inthe presence of a 2-fold excess of stigmatel-
lin to further elucidate the observed shifts (Fig. 5).
Large variations were seen over the full spectral
range. The spectral region between 1760 and
1710 cm
)1
is characteristic of variations in the
m(C = O) mode for protonated acidic residues
[26,27,37]. A new positive feature appears at 1723 cm
)1
,
and a small decrease ofthe signal at 1744 cm
)1
is seen.
This is in line with a previous study on the yeast bc
1
complex [18]. These difference signals include contribu-
tions from several acidic residues (Fig. 5). Shifts at
approximately 1540 cm
)1
as well as at 1447 and
1428 cm
)1
indicate possible variations of a deprotonat-
ed acidic residue, like, for example, amino acid side
chains and heme propionates [39]. Further significant
shifts, not arising from contributions ofthe inhibitor
itself, are seen inthe amide I range, i.e. at 1635, 1646
and 1670 cm
)1
, as observed previously for inhibitor
binding to the yeast bc
1
complex [18]. These may
reflect changes inthe backbone that occur upon inhibi-
tor binding, such as reorientation ofthe Rieske
domain upon stigmatellin binding as reported previ-
ously [2,4,40–42]. In addition, the variation ofthe sig-
nal at 1646 and 1635 cm
)1
upon addition of
stigmatellin may at least be partially attributed to
C = O modes ofthe displaced quinone loosely bound
to the protein. Stigmatellin is added to the sample
without any further separation, and the displaced qui-
none should be observable inthe difference spectra.
FTIR difference spectra ofthe mutants in the
presence of stigmatellin
Figure 6 shows the redox-induced FTIR difference
spectra ofthe E295Q, D278N and Y302F mutant
enzymes inthe presence of a 2-fold excess of stigmatel-
lin in comparison to that of wild-type. Inthe amide I
range, all mutants showed a typical shift at 1646 cm
)1
upon bindingof stigmatellin, as also observed for
wild-type. This shift is thought to indicate the quinone
displacement or a variation in backbone due to the
bound inhibitor. Nevertheless, major differences among
the mutants with respect to the spectroscopic binding
characteristics were seen inthe double difference spec-
tra obtained by subtracting the oxidized-minus-reduced
FTIR difference spectra ofthe mutants recorded in the
presence and absence of stigmatellin (Fig. 7).
The redox-induced FTIR difference spectrum of the
E295 mutant inthe presence of stigmatellin displays
most ofthe typical signals ofthe inhibitor binding,
except for the spectral range specific for protonated
acidic residuesaround 1744 cm
)1
. No obvious varia-
tion was seen here. Interestingly, a new signal arose at
1560 cm
)1
, reflecting changes inthebinding pocket.
Additional variations were seen around 1637 cm
)1
in
the amide I region, possibly due to displacement of the
differently bound quinone. The signal seen at
1744 ⁄ 1723 cm
)1
in the wild-type spectrum can thus be
attributed to the E295 side chain.
1800
1700 1600 1500 1400 1300
1200
1800
1700 1600 1500 1400 1300
1200
0.002
Δ
s
b
A
A
B
8 8 5 1
7
4 4
1
2 4 2 1
8
2
4 1
0 4 5 1
8 1 6 1
5 3 6 1
6 4 6 1
0 7 6 1
8 9 6 1
4 4 7 1
3 2 7
1
0.002
Δ
s
b
A
4
0
7 1
C
3 1 5 1
4 9
2 1
6 4
3 1
3 8
3 1
4
4 4 1
7
6
4 1
5 3 5 1
3 6 5 1
0 0 6 1
2 2 6 1
3
9 6 1
4 4 6 1
0 7 6 1
2 5 2 1
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
1775
3 2 7 1
(cm
–1
)
4 4 7 1
1750 1725
Fig. 5. (A) Oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR difference spectra of the
cytochrome bc
1
complex from P. denitrificans obtained for a
change in potential from )0.292 to +0.708 V with a 2-fold excess
of stigmatellin (black line) in comparison with wild-type (gray line).
(B) Double difference spectrum (wild-type inhibited with 2-fold
excess of stigmatellin minus its inhibitor-free counterpart). The
spectral region characteristic for protonated residues is enlarged in
the inset above (A). (C) Effect of addition of a 10-fold excess of
stigmatellin (dotted line) in comparison with the spectrum obtained
for a 2-fold excess (black line), highlighting the contributions of
stigmatellin. The spectra are normalized to the a-band
(553 ⁄ 559 nm) inthe visible spectrum.
Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site T. Kleinschroth et al.
4778 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
In the case ofthe D278N mutant enzyme, a differen-
tial signal was observed at 1750 ⁄ 1728 cm
)1
upon bind-
ing ofthe inhibitor. On the basis ofthe up-shift of the
differential signals by about 6–4 cm
)1
in comparison
with wild-type, weaker hydrogen bonding or a more
hydrophobic environment ofthe C = O group of the
E295 side chain can be deduced. Differential features
in the spectral range for deprotonated acidic residues
at 1588 ⁄ 1565 cm
)1
and 1446 ⁄ 1428 cm
)1
were lost in
the double difference spectra ofthe D278N mutant as
highlighted by arrows. The signals inthe amide I range
are clearly shifted in comparison to wild-type. D278
appears to be deprotonated inthe stigmatellin-bound
form, and this residue obviously influences the stigma-
tellin binding site.
In the redox-induced FTIR difference spectra of the
Y302F variant inthe presence of stigmatellin (Fig. 6),
only a small amount of inhibitor is observed, but most
of the typical shifts are observed. Interestingly, the
negative signals at 1668 and 1702 cm
)1
are not
decreased as seen for wild-type and the D278N and
E295Q mutant enzymes, and instead only a broad shift
at 1707 cm
)1
was noted inthe double difference spec-
tra. This indicates that, after mutation at residue
Y302, an alternative residue is involved inthe proton
displacement that takes place aroundthe Q
o
site, pos-
sibly accompanied by a small change inthe backbone.
This ‘rescue’ would also explain why mutation of this
crucial residue does not lead to any significant loss in
activity. The typical shifts at approximately 1670 and
1646 cm
)1
cannot be seen inthe same intensity ratio.
Discussion and Conclusions
In this study, the effects ofmutationsin conserved
residues ofcytochrome b fromthecytochrome bc
1
complex of P. denitrificans were studied. A detailed
redox-induced FTIR difference spectroscopic study of
the variants was performed inthe presence and
absence of stigmatellin, and band assignments are
summarized in Table 2. Two regions were addressed:
residues inthe immediate vicinity ofthe Q
o
binding
site, and residues E81, D86 and D278, located close to
the surface. These structural regions are analyzed and
1700 1600 1500 1400
0.0005
ΔΔ sbA
6461
88
5
1
2051
20
5
1
21
5
1
5361
3371
4471
0
571
0
6
5
1
8241
644
1
4351
7441
8
2
41
5
651
0451
2
4
51
2561
056
1
8661
0761
0761
89
6
1
2071
7071
3271
8271
ddwt
ddD278N
ddE295Q
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
Fig. 7. Double difference spectra obtained by subtracting the oxi-
dized-minus-reduced FTIR difference spectra ofthe D278N and
E295Q mutationsofcytochrome bc
1
in the presence of stigmatellin
from those of their inhibitor-free counterparts.
1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200
0.001
Δ
s
bA
1651
6461
4471
6
471
2471
Y302F
E295Q
D278N
WT
Wavenumber (cm
–1
)
Fig. 6. Oxidized-minus-reduced FTIR difference spectra for the
D278N, E295Q and Y302F mutants ofthecytochrome bc
1
complex
from P. denitrificans obtained for a change in potential from )0.292
to +0.708 V inthe presence of stigmatellin.
T. Kleinschroth et al. Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4779
discussed below inthe light of current views on the
role ofthe so-called PEWY loop.
Residues E81 and D86 are positioned close to the
surface ofcytochrome b at a distance of approximately
29 and 20 A
˚
, respectively, fromthe Q
o
binding site
(see Fig. 1), as measured fromthe chromone head-
group ofthe inhibitor [2]. Their involvement in a water
chain leading up to the heme b
L
edge, and their parti-
cipation in proton exit fromthe quinol site has been
suggested previously on the basis of molecular dynam-
ics modeling [43] ofthe bc
1
structure from chicken [4].
This water chain was later experimentally visualized in
the structure for thecomplexfrom Saccharomyces
cerevisiae [2]. Interactions with thebindingsite may be
based on hydrogen bonding and include lipids (as sug-
gested in [2,4]). Inthe study presented here, decreased
activity was found for the D86N mutant enzyme. The
E81Q mutant enzyme showed a lower affinity towards
stigmatellin. The redox-induced FTIR difference spec-
tra were perturbed with respect to signals for an acidic
residue that is protonated inthe reduced form, and,
interestingly, the quinone and backbone contributions
were also shifted. For both the D86N and E81Q
mutant enzymes, changes in quinone contributions
were observed inthe respective difference spectra, indi-
cating an interaction between these acidic residues and
the Q
o
binding site. The observed shifts may be a sec-
ondary-order effect induced by perturbation of the
water chain that leads to the heme b
L
edge and resi-
dues ofthe PEWY loop, including the E295 and Y297
residues studied here.
E295 is a heavily discussed position in close proxim-
ity to the quinone binding site, as suggested by
site-directed mutagenesis [10,13,16,41–45] and X-ray
crystallography [1–3,46]. All crystallographic data were
obtained inthe presence of stigmatellin under the
assumption that the inhibitor remains oxidized. In the
FTIR spectroscopic analysis ofthe E295 mutant in
the absence of inhibitor, signals characteristic of pro-
tonated acidic residuesinthe fully oxidized form are
partially lost in direct comparison to the wild-type.
Table 2. Summary of tentative assignments for the oxidized-
minus-reduced FTIR difference spectra ofthe P. denitrificans bc
1
complex based on recent data from potential titrations [18] and
site-directed mutants in this study. A positive symbol (+) indicates
the oxidized state, a negative symbol ()) indicates the reduced
state. In case of a composite signal, the main peak is given.
Band position (cm
)1
)
before and after
stigmatellin addition
AssignmentBefore After
1746 (+) m(C = O) D278, E295
1724 ()) m(C = O) D86 and further Asp ⁄ Glu
1723 (+) m(C = O) E295
1710 (+) m(C = O) Asp ⁄ Glu (cytochrome b
H
)
1693 (+) 1698 (+) Amide I (Rieske b-sheet)
m(C = O) heme propionates b
L
, b
H
1680 (+) m(C = O) heme propionates b
L
, b
H
, c
1
m(C = O) Gln ⁄ Asn (cytochrome b
H
)
Amide I (loop structures Rieske)
1670 (+) m(CN
3
H
5
) Arg (cytochrome b
H
)
1670 (+) Stigmatellin when added in excess
Perturbed m(C = O) heme propionates
1658 (+) Amide I (a-helical, unordered)
m(C = O) quinone
1646 ⁄ 1635 (+) Amide I
m(C = O) quinone
1644 (+) m(C = O) quinone
m
37
heme c
1
1628 ()) Amide I (Rieske b-sheet)
m(CN
3
H
5
) Arg (cytochrome b
H
)
1612 (+) m(C = C) quinone
1592 (+)
1570 (+) Amide II
m
37
heme b
L
m
38
heme c
1
1561 ()) m(COO
)
)
as
D278, E295
1565 ⁄ 1540 ()) m(COO
)
)
as
heme propionates b
L
, b
H
, c
1
m(COO
)
)
as
Asp ⁄ Glu (cytochrome b
H
)
D278, E295
1550 (+) Amide II
m
38
heme b
H
1540 ()) Amide II
m(COO
)
)
as
Asp ⁄ Glu (cytochrome b
H
)
m(COO
)
)
as
heme propionates b
L
, b
H
1520 (+) Y297, Y302
m
19
(CC) ring mode, protonated Tyr
1516 ()) Y297, Y302
m
19
(CC) ring mode, protonated Tyr
1508 (+) Amide II (Rieske)
1496 ()) Quinone ring
1470 ()) Quinone ring
1447 (+) 1447 (+) m(COO
)
)
s
D278
1432 ()) Quinone ring
1428 ()) m(COO
)
)
s
D278
1408 ()) Quinone ring
1388 ()) Quinone ring
m(COO
)
)
s
Asp ⁄ Glu (cytochrome b
H
)
1368 ()) m(COO
)
)
s
heme propionates
Table 2. (Continued)
Band position (cm
)1
)
before and after
stigmatellin addition
Assignment
Before After
1289 (+) m(C–O) methoxy group, quinone
1264 (+) m(C–O) methoxy group, quinone
m
42
heme c
1
1240 ()) m
42
heme b
H
1204 (+) Quinone
Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site T. Kleinschroth et al.
4780 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
On this basis, we suggest that the side chain is proton-
ated inthe oxidized form (signal at 1746 cm
)1
) and de-
protonated inthe reduced form (signal at 1561 cm
)1
).
In the presence of inhibitor, the residue remains pro-
tonated inthe oxidized form, but exhibits stronger
hydrogen bonding (signal at 1723 cm
)1
). In the
reduced form, however, it is possibly deprotonated
(signal at 1565 cm
)1
). The redox-induced FTIR differ-
ence spectrum ofthe D278 mutant indicates the partial
contribution of this side chain to the signals of the
protonated acidic residues for the oxidized form in the
absence ofthe inhibitor. The shifts ofthe signals
attributed to E295 indicate perturbation ofthe hydro-
gen-bonding network inthe D278N mutant.
In a recent study, the influence ofthe mutation
E295 inthe bc
1
complex from Rhodobacter capsulatus
was assessed [50]. No obvious influence of this muta-
tion on the FTIR spectra in comparison with wild-type
was reported for either the spectral region of proton-
ated acidic residues or the spectral region characteristic
of contributions from quinones and the backbone.
While our approach targets the fully oxidized and
reduced forms ofthe enzyme, the data for R. capsula-
tus present the reorganizations induced by heme b
L
reduction only. Obviously, the heme b
L
redox reaction
alone does not affect this residue. We suggest that this
side chain is addressed by the quinone reaction, as also
suggested by the strong perturbations ofthe signals
around 1660–1630 cm
)1
. Inthe P. denitrificans E295Q
mutant, this residue is perturbed, and the quinones are
involved inthe redox reaction. The data from both
studies may therefore be considered complementary.
However, this may not be the only conflicting evi-
dence regarding mutations at position 295. Recently,
the stigmatellin resistance of yeast mutations at this
position has been studied by various groups: whereas
conservative replacements lead to increased stigmatel-
lin resistance [48], more pronounced exchanges had no
noteworthy effects [6]. Indeed, none ofthe mutations
completely abolished the prominent signals characteris-
tic for protonated acidic residues. We suggest that resi-
dues D278 and E295 both contribute to the signal of
the oxidized form. Contributions from other acidic res-
idues within the enzyme cannot be excluded. The
observation that several acidic residues participate in
this spectral feature is in line with the elaborate pH
dependency previously described [19].
The tyrosine mutations appear rather unperturbed
in comparison with wild-type, despite the close prox-
imity ofthe tyrosines to the Q
o
binding site. Most of
the mutants studied here alter the spectral features of
the quinone, indicating a variation ofthe hydrogen-
bonding environment and ⁄ or structure within the
binding site. This observation is not surprising in the
light of previous data showing that mutations on the
Y302 site induce noticeable conformational changes,
perturb kinetics, and affect inhibitor as well as quinone
binding [30].
A second quinone has been discussed to be located
at thesite [19,44], probably in direct interaction with
the first quinone. The exact position of this second
quinone is not clear, and it is not possible to distin-
guish which quinone is primarily perturbed by the var-
ious mutations. On the basis of previous data and the
intensity ofthe quinone modes, the second quinone
bound is clearly observed inthe redox-induced spectra
[19]. The intensity ofthe typical quinone signals pre-
sented above indicates that more than one quinone is
also present inthe mutants. The broadening of the
m(CO) vibration at about 1654 cm
)1
, however, indi-
cates that one ofthe quinones is less tightly bound.
Essential features observed for specific side chains
studied in other bc
1
complexes were also found to be
important for the bc
1
complex from P. denitrificans.
Interestingly, most ofthe mutants retain a high degree
of catalytic activity (see Table 1), indicating a rather
flexible bindingsiteinthe bacterial enzyme. In a recent
FTIR spectroscopic study, the infrared spectroscopic
characteristics ofthe E295 mutant (E272 in yeast) were
studied by a parallel approach [18]. Stigmatellin bind-
ing was found to induce a similar effect to that shown
here: a signal for a protonated acidic residue at
approximately 1724 cm
)1
appears and the original sig-
nal decreases [18]. These results are not unambiguous,
especially in light of currently discussed mechanisms
and experimental observations suggesting that E295 is
deprotonated upon inhibitor binding [2,43]. Certainly,
the suggested proton transfer via residue E295 within
the hydrogen-bonding network of a water channel
could also occur with a protonated E295 residue
[2,43,51]. Thebindingof quinol to the protonated resi-
due, however, is difficult to substantiate. We note that
binding of stigmatellin was previously suggested to
mimic the interaction with the quinone radical [52] and
the stable intermediate that involves bindingof the
Rieske iron sulfur protein [53]. According to the cur-
rent view, stigmatellin displaces a quinol molecule [51],
and the spectra shown here (Fig. 7) reflect this interac-
tion. We suggest that the high pK seen here for E295
in the oxidized form (> 7) may shift during the cata-
lytic cycle, allowing deprotonation and thus stabiliza-
tion ofthe quinol.
The redox activity ofthe stigmatellin reported previ-
ously [18] poses a challenge for data interpretation, as
the structure ofthe reduced form is not clear. A recent
study [54] has suggested reduction ofthe C = O group
T. Kleinschroth et al. Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4781
in the stigmatellin ring to a hydroxyl group, with the
COH moiety no longer interacting with the His group
from the Rieske protein. Based on the redox potential
of the stigmatellin (P. Hellwig and C. Boudon, Institute
de Chimie, Louis Pasteur University of Strasbourg;
unpublished results), we note that the Rieske center is
exclusively affected by a change inthe redox state of
the stigmatellin.
In conclusion, the redox-induced FTIR difference
spectra ofthe site-directed mutationsinthe Q
o
bind-
ing siteofthe bc
1
complex from P. denitrificans,a
small bacterial version ofthe mitochondrial enzyme,
allow specific monitoring ofthe protonation state of
several crucialresiduesinthe presence and absence of
stigmatellin. Interestingly, several residues perturb the
orientation ofthe quinone bindingsite and are poten-
tial partners in a hydrogen-bonding network. D278
and E81 have been found to be critically involved in
the interaction, in addition to the highly discussed res-
idues E295 and Y302. We conclude that a strong
interaction occurs among theresiduesofthe quinone
binding site.
Experimental procedures
Sample preparation
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis for the Y302F protein was carried out using a
StuI ⁄ XhoI cassette excised fromthe wild-type fbc operon
[45], into which a StuI site was introduced between the fbcF
and fbcB open reading frames at residue 1024, and subcl-
oned into the vector pSL1180. For mutations E81Q, D86N
and Y147F, mutagenesis was performed using an NcoI ⁄
SmaI cassette fromthe wild-type fbc operon introduced
into the pUC18 vector.
The following primers were used: bE81Q, 5¢-CGCC
TCGGTCCAGCATATCATGCG-3¢; bD86N, 5¢-GCATA
TCATGCGCAACGTGAACGGCGGCTAC-3¢; bY147F,
5¢-GCCTTCATGGGCTTCGTGCTGCCCTGG-3¢; bD278N,
5¢-CTCGATATAGTTGTTGGGATGGCCCAG-3¢; bD295Q,
5¢-CATATCGTGCCGCAATGGTATTTCGTG-3¢; bY297F,
5¢-GTGCCGCAATGGTTCTTCCTGCCCTTC-3¢; bY302F,
5¢-GGTATTTCCTGCCCTTCTTCGCCATCCTGCG-3¢.
These were phosphorylated with T4 kinase (Fermentas, St
Leon-Rot, Germany) as specified by the manufacturer.
Mutations E81Q, D86N, Y147F and Y302F were intro-
duced into the wild-type fbc operon using the ‘Quik
Change’ mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA,
USA). The mutated cassettes were reinserted into the fbc
operon. Mutations E295Q, Y297F, and D278N were
introduced using the Altered Sites system (Promega, Man-
nheim, Germany). All mutations were confirmed by DNA
sequencing.
fbc operons encoding the wild-type or mutated P. deni-
trificans bc
1
complex were cloned into the HindIII ⁄ SacI
sites ofthe vector pRI2 [55]. The resulting plasmids were
conjugated into MK6, a chromosomal fbc deletion mutant
of P. denitrificans [56], resulting in strains overexpressing
the enzyme. Cell growth, membrane isolation, solubiliza-
tion and subsequent protein purification were performed
essentially as described previously [57], with the following
modifications: membranes were solubilized with n-dodecyl
b-d-maltoside (DDM; 1.2 gÆg
)1
protein), subsequently
diluted to a salt concentration of 350 mm NaCl using
50 mm Mes ⁄ NaOH (pH 6.0), 0.02% w ⁄ v DDM before
anion-exchange chromatography, and eluted using a salt
gradient between 350 and 600 mm NaCl inthe above
mentioned detergent buffer (50mm Mes ⁄ NaOH, pH 6.0,
0.02% v DDM). Pooled fractions were concentrated by
ultrafiltration (Amicon Centriprep ⁄ Centricon, Milipore,
Schwalbach, Germany; exclusion limit 100 kDa), equili-
brated with the standard buffer for the FTIR experiments
(100 mm phosphate buffer pH 7, 150 mm KCl, 0.02%
DDM) by gel filtration (Sephadex G25 fine; GE Health-
care, Munich, Germany), and subsequently ultrafiltrated
again to a final bc
1
enzyme concentration of approxi-
mately 0.5–2 mm. For H ⁄ D exchange, samples were equili-
brated in a 100-fold excess ofthe corresponding D
2
O
buffer, re-concentrated using ultrafiltration devices (Ami-
con Microcon, exclusion limit 100 kDa), and washed twice
with the same buffer for 30 min. H ⁄ D exchange was
found to be better than 80% as determined fromthe shift
of the amide II mode (data not shown). For inhibition of
the Q
o
site, the concentrated samples were incubated for
1 h on ice inthe presence of a 2-fold molar excess of
stigmatellin.
Activity assay
Ubihydroquinone–cytochrome c oxidoreductase activities
for the isolated wild-type and mutant preparations were
measured using decyl-ubihydroquinone (80 lm) and horse
heart cytochrome c (25 lm) as substrates in a buffer contain-
ing 50 mm Mops ⁄ NaOH pH 7.5, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm KCN
and 0.04% DDM. The reduction ofcytochrome c was fol-
lowed at 550 nm. Dilutions ofthe concentrated samples for
the activity measurements were made in a buffer containing
50 mm Mops ⁄ NaOH pH 7.5, 100 mm NaCl, 0.04% DDM,
5% glycerol and 0.05% BSA. To inhibit enzyme activity,
stigmatellin from a stock solution of 10 mm in ethanol was
added to a final concentration of 2 lm.
The IC
50
value was determined under activity test condi-
tions, but stigmatellin (0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 lm
final concentration from 10 mm stock in ethanol) was
added before the addition ofthe enzyme. V
max
was plotted
against the common logarithm (log 10) ofthe stigmatellin
concentration and fitted non-linearly. The IC
50
value is
defined as the inflection point ofthe curve.
Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsinthe Q
o
site T. Kleinschroth et al.
4782 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
[...]... The coupling of lightinduced electron transfer and proton uptake as derived from crystal structures of reaction centres from Rhodopseudomonas viridis modified at thebindingsiteofthe secondary quinone, QB Structure 5, 1339–1359 Link TA, Haase U, Brandt U & von Jagow G (1993) What information do inhibitors provide about the structure ofthe hydroquinone oxidation siteof ubihydroquinone :cytochrome. .. subunit ofthe bacterial and mitochondrial bc1complex Biochim Biophys Acta 1275, 61–69 46 Esser L, Elberry M, Zhou F, Yu C-A, Yu L & Xi D (2008) Inhibitor-complexed structures ofthecytochromebc1fromthe photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides J Biol Chem, 283, 2846–2857 47 Crofts AR (2004) Proton-coupled electron transfer at the Qo- siteofthebc1complex controls the rate of ubihydroquinone... Doppeldeletion ofthecytochrome c oxidase and reductase (cta and tbc operon) inParacoccusdenitrificans Diploma Thesis, J W Goethe-Universitat, ¨ Frankfurt am Main, Germany Schroter T, Hatzfeld OM, Gemeinhardt S, Korn M, ¨ Friedrich T, Ludwig B & Link TA (1998) Mutational analysis ofresidues forming hydrogen bonds inthe Rieske [2Fe–2S] cluster ofthecytochromebc1complexinParacoccus denitrificans. .. transfer by domain movement incytochromebc1 Nature 392, 677–684 5 Xia D, Yu CA, Kim H, Xia JZ, Kachurin AM, Zhang L, Yu L & Deisenhofer J (1997) Crystal structure ofthecytochromebc1complexfrom bovine heart mitochondria Science 277, 60–66 6 Seddiki N, Meunier B, Lemesle-Meunier D & Brasseur G (2008) Is cytochrome b glutamic acid 272 a quinol binding residue inthebc1complexof Saccharomyces... 77–92 48 Wenz T, Hellwig P, MacMillan F, Meunier B & Hunte C (2006) Probing the role of E272 in quinol oxidation of mitochondrial complex III Biochemistry 45, 9042– 9052 49 Kurowski B & Ludwig B (1987) The genes oftheParacoccusdenitrificansbc1complex Nucleotide sequence Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsintheQosite 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 and homologies between bacterial... the primary energy conversion reactions ofcytochromebc1complex Biochemistry 34, 15979–15996 14 Sharp RE, Gibney BR, Palmitessa A, White JL, Dixon JA, Moser CC, Daldal F & Dutton PL (1999) Effect of inhibitors on the ubiquinone binding capacity ofthe FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4773–4785 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4783 Infrared spectroscopic characterizationofmutationsin the. .. Mathe C, Rich PR, Moser CC & Dutton PL (2006) Role ofthe PEWY glutamate in hydroquinone–quinone oxidation–reduction catalysis inthe Q(o) siteofcytochromebc1 Biochemistry 45, 10492–10503 Crofts AR, Lhee S, Crofts SB, Cheng J & Rose S (2006) Proton pumping inthebc1 complex: a new gating mechanism that prevents short circuits Biochim Biophys Acta 1757, 1019–1034 Lancaster CR & Michel H (1997) The. .. & Mioskowski C (1994) Binding sites of quinones in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers investigated by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy: assignment ofthe interactions of each carbonyl of QA in Rhodobacter sphaeroides using site- specific 13C-labeled ubiquinone Biochemistry 33, 14378–14386 35 Brudler R, de Groot HJ, van Liemt WB, Steggerda WF, Esmeijer R, Gast P, Hoff AJ, Lugtenburg J... studies of iron–sulfur protein and cytochrome c1 inthe Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochromebc1complex Biochemistry 43, 9477–9486 Iwaki M, Yakovlev G, Hirst J, Osyczka A, Dutton PL, Marshall D & Rich PR (2005) Direct observation of redox-linked histidine protonation changes inthe iron– sulfur protein ofthecytochromebc1complex by ATR– FTIR spectroscopy Biochemistry 44, 4230–4237 Iwaki M, Giotta L, Akinsiku... changes at the heme propionates incytochrome c oxidase fromParacoccus denitrificans: direct evidence from FTIR difference spectroscopy in combination with heme propionate 13C labeling Biochemistry 37, 7400–7406 40 Darrouzet E, Valkova-Valchanova M, Ohnishi T & Daldal F (1999) Structure and function ofthe bacterial bc1 complex: domain movement, subunit interactions, and emerging rationale engineering attempts . Characterization of mutations in crucial residues around
the Q
o
binding site of the cytochrome bc
1
complex from
Paracoccus denitrificans
Thomas Kleinschroth
1
,. 2008)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06611.x
The protonation state of residues around the Q
o
binding site of the cyto-
chrome bc
1
complex from Paracoccus denitrificans and their interaction
with