Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 11 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
11
Dung lượng
618,32 KB
Nội dung
Functionalimportanceofaconservedsequencemotif in
FhaC, aprototypicmemberofthe TpsB/Omp85
superfamily
Anne-Sophie Delattre
1–4
, Bernard Clantin
5
, Nathalie Saint
6,7
, Camille Locht
1–4
, Vincent Villeret
5
and
Franc¸oise Jacob-Dubuisson
1–4
1 Inserm U1019, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, France
2 Institut Pasteur de Lille, France
3 Universite
´
Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
4 CNRS UMR8204, Lille, France
5 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire, USR3078 CNRS – Universite
´
de Lille 1 et 2, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
6 INSERM U554, Universite
´
de Montpellier 1 et 2, France
7 UMR5048 CNRS, Universite
´
de Montpellier 1 et 2, France
Keywords
Bordetella; outer membrane protein; protein
structure; protein transport; two-partner
secretion
Correspondence
F. Jacob-Dubuisson, 1, rue Calmette, 59019
Lille Cedex, France
Fax: +33 320 87 11 58
Tel: +33 320 87 11 55
E-mail: francoise.jacob@ibl.fr
Database
Structural data are available at the Protein
Data Bank under the accession number
2QDZ (FhaC
WT
)
(Received 23 July 2010, revised 8
September 2010, accepted 13 September
2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07881.x
In Gram-negative bacteria, the two-partner secretion pathway mediates the
secretion of TpsA proteins with various functions. TpsB transporters specifi-
cally recognize their TpsA partners inthe periplasm and mediate their trans-
port through a hydrophilic channel. The filamentous haemagglutinin
adhesin (FHA) ⁄ FhaC pair represents a model two-partner secretion system,
with the structure ofthe TpsB transporter FhaC providing the bases to deci-
pher the mechanism of action of these proteins. FhaC is composed of
a b-barrel preceded by two periplasmic polypeptide-transport-associated
(POTRA) domains in tandem. The barrel is occluded by an N-terminal
helix and an extracellular loop, L6, folded back into the FhaC channel. In
this article, we describe a functionally important motifof FhaC. The VRGY
tetrad is highly conservedinthe TpsB family and, inFhaC, it is located at
the tip of L6 reaching the periplasm. Replacement by Ala ofthe invariant
Arg dramatically affects the secretion efficiency, although the structure of
FhaC and its channel properties remain unaffected. This substitution affects
the secretion mechanism at a step beyond the initial TpsA–TpsB interaction.
Replacement oftheconserved Tyr affects the channel properties, but not
the secretion activity, suggesting that this residue stabilizes the loop in the
resting conformation of FhaC. Thus, theconservedmotif at the tip of L6
represents an important piece of two-partner secretion machinery. This
motif is conservedina predicted loop between two b-barrel strands in more
distant relatives of FhaC involved in protein transport across or assembly
into the outer membranes of bacteria and organelles, suggesting a conserved
function inthe molecular mechanism of transport.
Structured digital abstract
l
MINT-7996294: Fha30 (uniprotkb:P12255) binds (MI:0407)toFhaC (uniprotkb:P35077)by
filter binding (
MI:0049)
Abbreviations
ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; FHA, filamentous haemagglutinin adhesin; POTRA domain, polypeptide-transport-associated domain;
TPS, two-partner secretion; WT, wild-type.
FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4755
Introduction
Gram-negative bacteria possess a complex cell enve-
lope composed of two membranes. The outer mem-
brane, which provides the bacterium with significant
protection against toxic agents [1], represents a barrier
for the secretion of proteins destined for the cell sur-
face or the extracellular milieu. Thus, Gram-negative
bacteria have developed a number of pathways specifi-
cally devoted to protein secretion. Among these, the
two-partner secretion (TPS) pathway is widely repre-
sented. The ‘TpsB’ transporters mediate the secretion
across the outer membrane of their ‘TpsA’ exoprotein
partners, which serve as adhesins, cytolysins, invasins,
proteases, etc., to the bacterial cell surface or in the
extracellular milieu [2]. The TpsB proteins belong to
the TpsB ⁄ Omp85 superfamilyof protein transporters,
also called polypeptide-transporting b-barrel proteins
[3–5]. This superfamily includes transporters located in
the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria and
of organelles of endosymbiotic origin [3,6–12]. These
proteins, such as BamA (formerly YaeT) in Escherichia
coli, Toc75 and Oep80 in chloroplasts, and Sam50 in
mitochondria, are essential parts of complexes involved
in protein transport across, or assembly into, the outer
membranes of their respective organisms or organelles.
The mechanistic principles of transport inthe TPS
pathway remain to be deciphered. The current model
of secretion is as follows. Export ofthe TpsA precur-
sor across the cytoplasmic membrane is mediated by
the Sec machinery. TpsA proteins harbour, at their
N-terminus, aconserved ‘TPS’ domain, approximately
250 residues long, required for secretion. Inthe peri-
plasm, the TPS domain in an extended conformation
is recognized by the periplasmic domain of its TpsB
partner [13]. This molecular interaction is then fol-
lowed by the initiation of TpsA translocation through
a hydrophilic channel formed by the transporter [14].
As secretion proceeds, the exoprotein folds progres-
sively at the cell surface into a long b-helix. The TPS
domain itself adopts a right-handed b-helical structure
with short extrahelical segments [15–17]. Two subtypes
of TPS system have been identified, which differ by the
sequences ofthe TPS domains ofthe TpsA proteins
and by those of their TpsB transporters [16,18]. Never-
theless, the structure ofthe TPS domain is highly con-
served between the two subtypes [15–17], indicating
that the TPS pathway is dedicated to the secretion of
b-solenoid proteins [19].
Our model TPS system is the filamentous haemag-
glutinin adhesin (FHA) ⁄ FhaC pair ofthe whooping
cough agent Bordetella pertussis. FHA is a major
adhesin of this respiratory pathogen, and FhaC is its
specific TpsB transporter [20]. The structure of FhaC
has been solved by X-ray crystallography [21]. FhaC is
monomeric and comprises a 16-stranded b-barrel
(height, 35 A
˚
) joined by short periplasmic turns and
longer surface loops, called L1–L8. The N-terminus of
the protein is located inthe extracellular milieu and
folds into a 20-residue-long a-helix, H1, that passes
right through the transmembrane barrel. The C-termi-
nus of H1 emerges into the periplasm and is connected
to two tandem polypeptide transport-associated (PO-
TRA) domains [22] via a 30-residue-long linker unde-
fined inthe crystal structure. The extracellular loop L6
that joins b-strands 11 and 12 ofthe barrel is folded as
a hairpin inthe barrel interior, with its tip reaching
the periplasm. The barrel of FhaC forms an ion-per-
meable channel in lipid bilayers, and we have proposed
that this pore represents the FHA-conducting channel
[14,23]. However, because it is almost totally occluded
in the structure, significant conformational changes
must take place inthe transport process. Other pro-
teins ofthesuperfamily have also been shown to form
ion-permeable channels in lipid bilayers [9,24–29].
However, the role ofthe pore for the mechanism of
integration of membrane proteins remains unknown.
Contrary to H1, which can be removed without sig-
nificant loss of function, deletions of POTRA1,
POTRA2 or L6 abolish FhaC activity [14,21]. Interest-
ingly, the L6 loop of FhaC harbours aconserved motif
found in most members ofthesuperfamily [3,4]. In
FhaC, the highly conserved V449RGY452 tetrad is
located at the tip of L6 close to the periplasmic side of
the barrel. In this study, we demonstrate that the
replacement of Arg by Ala in this conservedmotif dra-
matically affects the secretion activity ofFhaC, but
not the properties ofthe FhaC channel or its structure.
In contrast, replacement oftheconserved Tyr affects
the pore properties ofFhaC, but not its secretion
activity, indicating a more subtle role for this residue.
This work thus provides the first identification of a
functionally important motif for the molecular mecha-
nism of TpsB transporters. Because the VRGY ⁄ F
motif highlighted here is conservedin the
TpsB ⁄ Omp85 superfamily, it is also likely to be func-
tionally relevant for other members ofthe superfamily.
Results
Conservation of L6 sequenceinthe superfamily
The VRGY motif is located at the tip of L6 of FhaC,
which reaches the periplasm. Alignments of the
Importance ofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC A S. Delattre et al.
4756 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS
predicted L6 sequences ofa number of TpsB trans-
porters show that the VRGY ⁄ F tetrad is conserved in
both TpsB subtypes, with Arg totally invariant and
only slight variations at the first, third and fourth posi-
tions ofthemotif ([18] and Fig. 1). Inthe rest of L6, a
few other residues are conserved between the two TpsB
subtypes, which otherwise appear to have distinct sig-
natures. To enlarge our analysis, thesequenceof L6
was also aligned with the corresponding regions of rep-
resentative members ofthe superfamily, including
E. coli YaeT (BamA), Neisseria meningitidis Omp85,
Arabidopsis thaliana Toc75-III and Oep80, Saccharo-
myces cerevisiae Sam50, and TeOmp85 ofthe cyano-
bacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus [30] (Fig. 1).
In all proteins, a VRGY-related motif is found in a
segment predicted to form a loop between two strands
of the b-barrel and located close to, and at a conserved
distance from, the C-terminus. Of note, the length of
the predicted loops varies between proteins [18]. In all
proteins, the Arg residue ofthe VRGY-related motif is
invariant (Fig. 1). The other three residues ofthe motif
are not strictly invariant, but their physicochemical
features are well conserved. Additional similarities are
conspicuous inthe same region (Fig. 1). Furthermore,
the analysis ofthe sequences ofa large number of pre-
dicted Toc75, Sam50 and Omp85 homologues indi-
cated the presence ofa closely related tetrad in the
vast majority of these proteins (not shown). In most
proteins, the first position of this motif harbours a
hydrophobic residue (Val, Ile or Leu), although other
residues occur occasionally. Arg and Gly residues are
found overwhelmingly at the second and third posi-
tions, exceptionally replaced by Lys or Ser and by Ala
or Ser, respectively. The fourth position ofthe tetrad
is occupied by Phe or Tyr inthe vast majority of pro-
teins or, occasionally, by other hydrophobic residues
or His. This region is the best conservedinthe super-
family, which strongly suggests that it is important for
the structure or function of these transporters.
Importance ofconservedmotif for FhaC function
The complete deletion of L6 in FhaC has been shown
to abolish the secretion of FHA, indicating the impor-
tance of this loop for transport activity [21]. However,
the channel properties of FhaC are also strongly
Fig. 1. Sequence alignments of representative proteins ofthe TpsB ⁄ Omp85 superfamily. Thesequence around theconserved VRGY ⁄ F tet-
rad is shown. The first line shows the FhaC sequence, with the first six and last three residues belonging to b-strands 11 and 12 of the
b-barrel, respectively. Note that the loop corresponding to L6 is predicted to be longer in some other proteins ofthesuperfamily [18]. Only
proteins that have been characterized to some degree were selected for the alignment, excluding predicted proteins. The first 12 proteins
belong to the TpsB family, with the first seven belonging to subtype I TpsB and the last five to subtype II TpsB transporters. The other six
proteins belong to other groups ofthe superfamily. The more conserved motifs are highlighted. At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bp, Bordetella per-
tussis; Ech, Erwinia chrysanthemi; Ec, Escherichia coli; Et, Edwardsiella tarda; Hd, Haemophilus ducreyi; Hi, Haemophilus influenzae; Nm,
Neisseria meningitidis; Pf, Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pm, Proteus mirabilis; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sm, Serratia marcescens; Te,
Thermosynechococcus elongatus; Ye, Yersinia enterocolitica.
A S. Delattre et al. Importanceofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC
FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4757
affected by the 34-residue-long deletion, which suggests
that it might perturb significantly the structure of the
protein. In order to probe more finely the function of
the conservedmotifof L6, the VRGY tetrad was tar-
geted by site-directed mutagenesis to alter its physico-
chemical properties. Because ofthe poor resolution of
L6 inthe FhaC structure, no information is available
regarding putative interactions between the side chains
of these residues and the rest ofthe protein. We thus
chose to replace Arg and Tyr based on their strong
conservation inthe superfamily, whereas Gly was not
targeted because it might be involved inthe structure
of the loop. Arg450 and Tyr452 were replaced by
Ala separately or together, thus creating FhaC
R450A
,
FhaC
Y452A
and FhaC
R450A+Y452A
. The three FhaC
variants were co-expressed with a gene encoding a
secretion-competent, N-terminal FHA derivative called
Fha44 in E. coli [31], and the secretion of Fha44 in
culture supernatants was determined by semiquantita-
tive immunoblotting using anti-FHA IgG1’s (Fig. 2).
In parallel, the localization and abundance of FhaC in
the outer membrane were analysed by immunoblotting
of membrane extracts with an anti-FhaC serum
(Fig. 2). The R450A substitution and the double sub-
stitution both reduced FHA secretion by approxi-
mately 90% relative to the wild-type (WT) control
(FhaC
WT
), whereas FhaC was present in similar
amounts in all strains. In contrast, the Y452A replace-
ment appeared to have no significant effect on FHA
secretion. Thus, the invariant Arg residue, but not the
conserved aromatic residue, is essential for FhaC
activity.
Effect ofthe substitutions on FHA recognition
In the TPS pathway, the first step of secretion is a spe-
cific recognition between the two partners inthe peri-
plasm. This is followed by the translocation of the
TpsA partner through the channel formed by its TpsB
transporter. We have shown that the POTRA-contain-
ing periplasmic portion of FhaC binds FHA in vitro
[13,21]. Because the tip ofthe L6 loop reaches the peri-
plasm, it is conceivable that it also participates in the
initial interaction with the substrate.
To determine whether the interaction between FHA
and FhaC is affected by the introduced substitutions,
the FhaC variants were tested for their ability to rec-
ognize an immobilized FHA fragment harbouring
the TPS domain [13,21]. Using this overlay assay,
FhaC
R450A
and FhaC
Y452A
bound to the FHA frag-
ment quite efficiently (Fig. 3). To obtain a semiquanti-
tative assessment of their binding, we performed
densitometry scanning ofthe FhaC bands from several
overlays. Using the WT band as a reference (100%),
relative binding values of 84 ± 6% and 105 ± 25%
were observed for FhaC
R450A
and FhaC
Y452A
, respec-
tively. This indicates that the tip ofthe L6 loop does
not appear to play a significant role for the initial
recruitment of FHA inthe periplasm.
Structure of FhaC
R450A
In order to test whether R450 is essential for the struc-
tural integrity ofFhaC, e.g. for the position of func-
tionally important elements such as the POTRA
domains or L6, the structure of FhaC
R450A
was solved
by X-ray crystallography. FhaC
R450A
crystallized in
the same conditions as its FhaC
WT
counterpart [21].
Data collection and refinement statistics are given in
A
B
Fig. 2. Role of R450 ofthe VRGY tetrad for FhaC activity. (A)
Secretion activity ofthe FhaC variants. Escherichia coli UT5600 har-
bouring two plasmids, pFJD12 that encodes an efficiently secreted
FHA derivative called Fha44 and pFcc3 (encoding FhaC),
pFcc3-
R450A
, pFcc3-
Y452A
or pFcc3-
R450A+Y452A
, was grown to mid-
exponential phase, and expression ofthe recombinant fha44 gene
was induced for 3 h. Equal amounts of total membranes and non-
concentrated culture supernatants from all recombinant strains
were collected and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-FHA
IgG1’s and an anti-FhaC serum (top and bottom panels, respec-
tively). A representative experiment is shown. (B) Quantification of
the secretion efficiency. The amounts of protein were quantified by
densitometry scanning, and the Fha44 ⁄ FhaC ratio was calculated
for each recombinant strain, with the secretion activity ofthe strain
producing WT FhaC set to 100%. The experiments were per-
formed several times (> 3) for quantification.
Importance ofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC A S. Delattre et al.
4758 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS
Table 1. Although determined at a limited resolution
of 3.5 A
˚
, this structure allows us to compare the
R450A variant with WT FhaC. Overall, the structure
of the FhaC
R450A
variant is very similar to the
FhaC
WT
structure. This is exemplified by the rmsds for
the Ca superimposition ofthe barrel (0.44 A
˚
) and the
two POTRAs (0.61 A
˚
). The overall rmsd is 0.53 A
˚
(Fig. 4A). The relative orientation ofthe two POTRA
domains is the same in both structures, as well as the
presence and orientation of helix H1 and loop L6
inside the b-barrel. The moderate resolution of both
the WT and R450 structures does not allow the fine
analysis of differences between them. However, H1
clearly occupies a similar position in both structures
(Fig. 4B). With regard to L6, the electron density of
the R450A variant allows the unambiguous positioning
of residues Q433 to I441 and G463 to T469 inside the
b-barrel at positions similar to those observed in the
WT structure. Other residues ofthe L6 loop are not
seen inthe FhaC
R450A
structure, as a result ofa high
mobility ofthe loop and ⁄ or the limited resolution.
Nevertheless, the conformational constraints imposed
by residues Q433 to I441 and G463 to T469 on L6
demonstrate that this loop occupies similar positions
inside the b-barrel in both FhaC
WT
and the FhaC
R450A
variant. Thus, our data strongly argue that the R450A
substitution has no significant effect on the structure
of the FhaC barrel and the POTRA domains, or on
the position of L6 inthe channel, and therefore the
Arg450 residue is probably conserved for a functional
rather than a structural purpose.
Channel properties ofthe FhaC variants
Because L6 is not clearly defined inthe FhaC
R450A
structure, we tested whether the low secretion activity
of FhaC
R450A
could be explained by pore alteration
using electrophysiological techniques. Indeed, we have
observed previously that FhaC variants with low secre-
tion activities generally have altered pore properties
[14]. The electrophysiological properties of FhaC
R450A
and FhaC
Y452A
inserted in lipid bilayers were analysed
in comparison with those of FhaC
WT
. Initial character-
ization was performed by inserting a large number
(about 100) of FhaC molecules ina membrane submit-
ted to slow ramps of voltage. Asymmetric I ⁄ V record-
ings, similar to those observed previously with
FhaC
WT
(Fig. 5A, part a), were obtained for both
variants (Fig. 5B, part a; Fig. 5C, part a). This asym-
metric I ⁄ V profile indicated that both proteins have a
preferred sense of insertion into the lipid bilayers, simi-
lar to FhaC
WT
. The two mutants showed a linear I ⁄ V
relationship from +120 mV to around )60 mV, indi-
cating a voltage-independent ion conductance in this
voltage range (Fig. 5B, part a; Fig. 5C, part a). From
)60 to )120 mV, the I ⁄ V curve of both variants lost
its linearity and the current recorded at the two
Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics.
FhaC
R450A
Data collection
Cell parameters (A
˚
) 107.55, 139.39, 113.08
Space group C222
1
Wavelength (A
˚
) 0.93340
Resolution (A
˚
)
a
48.6–3.5 (3.6–3.5)
Completeness (%) 99.7 (100)
Redundancy 14.5 (14.9)
I ⁄ rI 30.0 (6.1)
Rmrgd-F (%) 6.4 (28.2)
Beamline ESRF ID14-1
Refinement
R
work
(%)
b
33.0
R
free
(%) 37.3
Rmsd
Bond lengths (A
˚
) 0.013
Bond angles (deg) 2.3
a
Number in parentheses is the statistic for the highest resolution
shell.
b
R factor = R||F
o
| ) |F
c
|| ⁄ R|F
o
|, where |F
o
| and |F
c
| are the
observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.
A
B
Fig. 3. Overlay assay showing FHA–FhaC interactions. The FHA
derivative Fha30, immobilized on separate nitrocellulose strips, was
used as bait for the indicated FhaC
myc
variants. Following incuba-
tion ofthe strips with each ofthe FhaC variants, the Fha30–FhaC
complexes were detected with an anti-c-myc IgG1 followed by ECL
reaction. The strips were aligned and the ECL reaction was carried
out simultaneously for all strips, using a single autoradiographic
film. A representative experiment is shown. (A) Amounts of Fha30
used as bait as analysed ina duplicate electrophoresis gel. The gel
was stained with Coomassie blue. (B) FhaC
myc
detected after the
overlay.
A S. Delattre et al. Importanceofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC
FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4759
voltage sweep directions revealed an hysteresis. Thus,
the curves ofthe current measured (I) as a function of
the voltage applied (V) do not superpose when V
increases or decreases, indicating a delay inthe con-
ductance in response to voltage changes. This hystere-
sis was similarly observed with FhaC
WT
(Fig. 5A, part
a). However, the two variants displayed different
behaviour in response to voltage, as revealed by a vari-
ation ofthe hysteresis shape, suggesting that they may
have different channel characteristics (Fig. 5D, part a).
The electrical properties ofthe two FhaC variants
were further examined in single-channel experiments
by measuring their conductance values. FhaC
R450A
showed discrete current transitions at positive and neg-
ative applied potentials (Fig. 5B, part b). The calcu-
lated conductance value from the two major peaks of
the current amplitude histogram was 1240 ± 130 pS
at positive voltage (Fig. 5D, part b), very similar to
that of FhaC
WT
[14]. Previous single-channel analyses
of FhaC
WT
have revealed different behaviours at posi-
tive and negative potentials, with noisier current and
the appearance of conductance substates at negative
polarity (Fig. 5A, part b). Moreover, WT channels at
negative potential usually display different opening
and closing kinetics than the channels recorded at
positive voltage (Fig. 5A, part b). FhaC
R450A
shares
these characteristics as, at negative potential, its cur-
rent recordings showed more rapid oscillations
between the open and closed states ofthe channel, and
substates giving rise to smaller conductance values
(1010 ± 160 pS). Interestingly, at both polarities, Fha-
C
R450A
channels displayed opening and closing kinetics
faster than those of WT.
In contrast with FhaC
R450A
, FhaC
Y452A
exhibited a
majority of very noisy channels at both polarities
(Fig. 5C, part b). Moreover, the current amplitude his-
togram at positive voltages displayed a broader distri-
bution of events compared with FhaC
R450A
, clearly
indicating the presence of many conductance substates
and impairing the determination ofa precise value of
conductance (Fig. 5C, part c). At negative potentials,
the channels were as noisy as those obtained at posi-
tive voltages and had a tendency to also display
reduced current amplitudes.
Altogether, the substitution of Arg450 by Ala does
not have a drastic effect on channel activity and thus
External
environment
AB
Outer
membrane
Periplasm
POTRA 2
POTRA 1
L6
H1
VRGY
Fig. 4. Superposition ofthe crystal structure of FhaC
R450A
determined at 3.5 A
˚
resolution (red) and the structure of FhaC
WT
(blue). (A) The
proteins are oriented with their surface side at the top. POTRA1 and 2, H1 and L6 are labelled. All structural elements, including the barrel,
the POTRA domains and H1 superpose neatly. (B) The VRGY motif is positioned on the WT structure. Because ofthe relatively low resolu-
tion for FhaC
R450A
, the position of L6 inside the barrel cannot be traced until the tip ofthe loop. However, the surface-proximal portions of
L6, which are defined by residues Q433 to I441 and G463 to T469, superpose well between the two proteins, arguing against a major con-
formational change ofthe loop. Structural data are available inthe Protein Data Bank under the accession numbers 2QDZ (FhaC
WT
) and
3NJT (FhaC
R450A
).
Importance ofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC A S. Delattre et al.
4760 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS
does not appear to affect the FhaC pore. In contrast,
the ion channel properties of FhaC
Y452A
are markedly
altered, indicating that the pore is modified by the sub-
stitution, possibly because interactions between L6 and
the b-barrel are affected.
Discussion
The structure ofFhaC,the first and thus far the only
full-length structure available for the TpsB ⁄ Omp85
superfamily, has provided useful insights into the
architecture of TpsB and related transporters [21]. The
mechanistic principles that govern TPS remain to be
elucidated, however. In this work, we provide the first
identification ofamotif functionally important for
TPS transport. Using a combination ofsequence align-
ments and structure–function analyses of FhaC vari-
ants obtained by site-directed mutagenesis, we show
that aconservedmotif at the tip ofthe long extracellu-
lar loop L6 is required for the activity ofthe trans-
porter. Its strong conservation in TpsB proteins
strongly indicates aconserved role for this motif in
TPS systems.
Altogether, our data show that Arg450 is essentially
important for function. Thus, although the FhaC
R450A
variant is strongly disabled with respect to secretion
activity, its global structure is not affected. The elec-
trophysiological properties of its channels are similar
to those of FhaC
WT
. In contrast, the complete deletion
of L6 both abolished the activity of FhaC and affected
its channel properties, arguing that it significantly
perturbed the structure ofthe protein [21]. The
FhaC
R450A
channels are, nevertheless, slightly less
stable than those of FhaC
WT
, suggesting that the
substitution may have caused minor structural changes
to the channel. FhaC
R450A
appears to recognize its
substrate as efficiently as FhaC
WT
, ruling out a role
for this conserved Arg inthe initial TpsA–TpsB inter-
action. We thus propose that Arg450 contributes to a
later step inthe secretion process related to the trans-
location ofthe substrate. The crucial position of L6
strongly argues that it is probably involved in the
conformational changes expected to take place on
translocation. Understanding its molecular function in
the translocation process will most probably involve
the characterization of secretion intermediates.
A
(a) (b) (c)
(a) (b) (c)
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
(c)
B
C
D
Fig. 5. Electrophysiological properties of
FhaC variants. (A) Characterization of the
channels formed by FhaC
WT
(figure repro-
duced from ref. [14]). (B, C) Characterization
of the channels formed by FhaC
R450A
and
FhaC
Y452A
, respectively. In (A–C), the I ⁄ V
curves between )100 and +100 mV are
shown in (a); the direction ofthe voltage
ramp is marked by the arrow near each
curve. The single-channel recordings at
positive and negative applied voltages are
shown in (b) (BL, baseline). In (c), the
associated amplitude histograms at +60 mV
are shown. (D) Comparison ofthe electro-
physiological behaviour of FhaC
R450A
(grey)
and FhaC
Y452A
(black) with superposition of
the I ⁄ V curves in (a) and ofthe amplitude
histograms in (b). The perturbed behaviour
of FhaC
Y452A
can be seen most clearly from
the absence of defined conductance levels.
A S. Delattre et al. Importanceofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC
FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4761
Interestingly, we showed that the replacement of
Tyr452 inthe same conserved L6 motif modifies the
pore properties of FhaC. The FhaC
Y452A
channel has
no defined conductance levels, indicating that it is less
stable. A similar behaviour has been observed previ-
ously with other variants harbouring peptide insertions
in L6 [14]. Of note, inthe latter cases, the secretion
activity of FhaC was abolished, whereas the single
Tyr452 to Ala substitution did not affect the secretion
activity ina significant manner. Thus, Tyr452 most
probably participates inthe positioning of L6 or the
regulation of L6 mobility inthe channel in the
absence of substrate, but its substitution by Ala does
not prevent L6 from adopting its ‘active’ conforma-
tion during translocation. Therefore, a possible func-
tion for Tyr452 may be to stabilize L6 inthe channel
when the protein is inthe ‘resting’ conformation, i.e.
not actively translocating FHA. The aromatic charac-
ter of this residue is well conservedinthe family,
which suggests aconserved role for this residue in the
channel.
Together with L6, the H1 helix also runs through
the channel. Unlike L6, however, H1 is not conserved
in the TpsB family, with at least one TpsB transporter
being devoid ofa helix before the POTRAs [18]. We
have also shown that it is not important for the secre-
tion activity of FhaC [14]. One possible function of H1
may be to plug the resting channel between two cycles
of secretion. We have obtained indications that
one FhaC molecule secretes several molecules of FHA
(F. Jacob-Dubuisson, unpublished data). If FhaC
cycles between several conformations, we have most
probably captured its ‘resting’ conformation by crystal-
lography, whereas structural rearrangements of the
channel are expected when FhaC is in action. If H1
moves out ofthe pore in vivo, this may trigger a repo-
sitioning of L6 for the secretion mechanism. Further
work will aim to test this hypothesis.
So far, our studies have identified two major players
in the TPS pathway: the TPS domain ofthe TpsA pro-
tein and L6 ofthe TpsB transporter [13,21] (this
work). A strong argument that these pieces ofthe TPS
machinery function together comes from sequence
alignments. Thus, it is striking that the two subtypes
of TPS system can be distinguished by specific signa-
tures in both elements [16,18] (this work). Similarly,
the sequences ofthe two POTRA domains differ
between the two subtypes of TpsB transporter [18].
The POTRAs are also essential for FhaC activity
[13,21], and therefore they also constitute essential
parts ofthe TPS machinery. All members ofthe super-
family share similar structural features, namely a
C-terminal b-barrel preceded by 1–7 POTRA domains
[30]. In addition, the VRGY ⁄ F sequencemotif is par-
ticularly well conserved, and its position relative to the
C-terminus ofthe barrel appears to be similar in all
proteins. In all cases, it is predicted to be part of an
extracellular loop between two b-strands ofthe barrel.
If, as suggested by its conservation, the VGRY⁄ F
tetrad is also functionally relevant in other members of
the TpsB ⁄ Omp85 superfamily, it implies that the barrel
actively participates inthe mechanism of these trans-
porters. Given the size ofthe substrates handled by
Omp85 transporters, however, these mechanisms
remain to be understood. Similar to that proposed for
FhaC, it is possible that the loop harbouring the con-
served motif is involved in critical conformational
changes in these other transporters.
Materials and methods
Plasmids and constructions
PCRII-TOPO12TM was constructed as follows: the fhaC
fragment encoding residues Pro275 to Phe454 was amplified
by PCR using pFcc3 [32] as template and the oligonucleo-
tides Fc12UP (5¢-TTAGATCTCCGCTGGGGCGTACGC
G-3¢) and FcA2Lo (5¢-CCAAGCTTCCGGGCTCAGAA
ACTGAGG-3¢) as primers. The amplicon was inserted into
pCRII-TOPO
Ò
(Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France) and
sequenced, yielding pCRII-TOPO12TM. The point muta-
tions were introduced using the QuikChange II XL Site-
Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, La Jolla,
CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
PCRII-TOPO12TM was used as a template with the
following primers : R450AUp (5¢-GACGAGTACACGGT
GGCCGGATACAACCTCAGGA-3¢) and R450ALo (5¢-TC
CTGAGGTTGTATCCG GCCACCGTGT ACTCGTC-3¢);
Y452AUp (5¢-ACACGGTGCGCGGAGCCAACCTCAAG
ACGTC-3¢) and Y452ALo (5¢-GACGTCCTGAGGTTGG
CTCCGGCCACCGTGT-3¢); RA+YAUp (5¢-ACACGGT
GGCCGGAGCCAACCTCAGGACGTC-3¢) and RA+YA
Lo (5¢-GACGTCCTGAGGTTGGCTCCGGCCACCGTG
T-3¢). After mutagenesis and sequence verification, the
BsiWI-HindIII fragments of these vectors were exchanged
for the WT fragment of pFcc3, yielding pFcc3-R
450
A, pFcc3-
Y
452
A and pFcc3-R
450
A+Y
452
A. The BsiWI-HindIII frag-
ments were similarly exchanged into pFJD118 [14], yielding
pFJD118-R
450
A and pFJD118-Y
452
A, which were used to
produce 6-His-tagged FhaC variants for electrophysiology
analyses [14]. pFJD118 encodes full-length FhaC with an N-
terminal 6-His tag. For crystallography, pT7FcA
450
-noHis
was used. It was generated by restricting pFJD118-R
450
A
with BamHI and re-ligating to eliminate the 6-His tag coding
sequence.
pFJD140 [13] was used for the production of c-myc-
tagged FhaC
WT
for the overlay assay. The PstI-HindIII frag-
Importance ofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC A S. Delattre et al.
4762 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS
ments of pFcc3-R
450
A and pFcc3-Y
452
A were introduced
into the same sites of pFJD140, replacing the WT fragment,
generating pFJD140-R
450
A and pFJD140-Y
452
A.
Secretion assay
E. coli UT5600 harbouring pFJD12 (encoding an 80-kDa
N-terminal portion of FHA called Fha44 which can be effi-
ciently secreted in E. coli [31]) was transformed with pFcc3,
pFcc3-R
450
A, pFcc3-Y
452
A or pFcc3-R
450
A+Y
452
A. The
cells were grown at 37 °C in liquid Luria–Bertani medium
until the cultures reached the late exponential phase
(A
600
= 0.8), and the expression of fha44 was induced with
1mm isopropyl thio-b-d-galactoside for 3 h at 37 °C. Bacte-
ria were then harvested by centrifugation at 10 000 g for
15 min at 4 °C. The culture supernatants were separated by
SDS ⁄ PAGE and analysed by western blot with a mixture of
anti-FHA monoclonal IgG1’s (F1, F4 and F5) [33]. The cell
pellets were resuspended in 50 mm Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 8.0),
150 mm NaCl, 10 lgÆmL
)1
DNAse I (Sigma, Lyon, France)
and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Complete EDTA Free,
Roche
Ò
, Rosny-sous-Bois, France), and the bacteria were
broken using a French pressure cell. After clarification of
the lysates by centrifugation at 20 000 g for 20 min, mem-
brane proteins were harvested by ultracentrifugation at
100 000 g for 1 h at 13 °C. Each pellet was resuspended in
200 lL ofthe same buffer as above. Equal amounts of sam-
ples were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE and analysed by western
blot with an anti-FhaC serum. This antibody was raised in
rats against the periplasmic domain of FhaC and prepared
by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). The amounts of Fha44
and FhaC were quantified by densitometry scanning of the
immunoblots, followed by data analysis with imagequant
tl software (GE HealthCare, Saclay, France).
Protein production and purification
The FhaC variants were produced and purified as described
previously [21].
Overlay assay
Fha30 is a 30-kDa, secreted FHA truncate encompassing
the TPS domain and first three repeats. It was used as bait
and FhaC
myc
and its variants as prey. Fha30 was produced
and purified as described previously [15]. Identical amounts
of Fha30 (5 lg) were loaded onto several lanes of
SDS ⁄ PAGE gels and, following electrophoresis, the protein
was blotted onto nitrocellulose. The strips of nitrocellulose
were each incubated with purified FhaC
myc
(WT or
mutant), and bound FhaC
myc
was detected using an anti-
c-myc IgG1 and chemiluminescence as in ref. [13]. The
strips were aligned and the development reaction [enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL); GE Healthcare] was carried out
simultaneously for all strips using a single autoradiography
film, for comparison purposes. The assay was repeated
three times.
Crystallization, data collection, structure
determination and refinement
FhaC
R450A
crystals were obtained at 20 °C using the hang-
ing drop vapour diffusion method. The protein and precipi-
tant solutions were mixed ina 1 : 1 ratio. Crystals were
grown at a protein concentration of 26 mgÆmL
)1
in 28%
poly(ethylene glycol) 1000, 1% b-octyl-glucoside and
500 mm imidazole (pH 6.5). The FhaC
R450A
crystals were
similar, with regard to space group and asymmetric unit
composition, to the native crystals reported previously [21].
The diffraction data were collected at 100 K on beamline
ID14-1 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
(Grenoble, France). The diffraction data were processed
with xds [34]. Data collection and refinement statistics are
summarized in Table 1.
The three-dimensional structure of FhaC
R450A
was solved
using the FhaC
WT
structure (PDB code: 2QDZ) as the
starting model. Rigid-body refinements were performed
with cns [35,36] using H1, L6, POTRA1, POTRA2 and the
b-barrel as independent bodies. The final refinement steps
were performed using the maximum likelihood algorithm,
and grouped B-factor calculation was performed with cns.
The refinement led to R
work
of 33.0% and R
free
of 37.3%
using all data to 3.5 A
˚
. The final model does not comprise
the first two residues, the loop between H1 and POTRA1
(residues 31–52) and the extracellular loops L1 (221–228),
L3 (295–301), L4 (342–350), L5 (384–397) and L8 (532–
542), which are not visible inthe electron density map. In
the FhaC
WT
structure, the tip of L6 (residues 443–458) was
not well defined inthe electron density map and was there-
fore built as a polyalanine chain. Inthe FhaC
R450A
struc-
ture, the residues 441–463 of L6 were not visible in the
electron density map and are not included inthe final
model. Structural data are available inthe Protein Data
Bank database under the accession number 3NJT.
Channel analysis
The planar lipid bilayer recordings were performed as
described in ref. [14]. Virtually solvent-free planar lipid
bilayers were formed over a 125–200-lm hole ina 10-lm-
thick polytetrafluoroethylene film pretreated with a mixture
of 1 : 40 (v ⁄ v) hexadecane–hexane and sandwiched between
two half glass cells. Phosphatidylcholine from soy beans
(azolectin from Sigma type IV S), dissolved in hexane
(0.5%), was spread on the top ofthe electrolyte solution
[1 m KCl, 10 mm Hepes (pH 7.4)] on both sides of the
bilayer chamber. Bilayer formation was achieved by lower-
ing and then raising the levels in one compartment and
monitoring capacity responses. The trans chamber was con-
nected to ground and the cis chamber to the input of a
A S. Delattre et al. Importanceofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC
FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4763
BLM 120 amplifier (Bio-Logic, Halifax, Canada). The puri-
fied FhaC proteins were added to the cis side
(5–100 ngÆmL
)1
) ofthe bilayer chamber.
For the macroscopic conductance experiments, doped
membranes were subjected to slow voltage ramps
(10 mVÆs
)1
), and the transmembrane currents were ampli-
fied (BBA-01; Eastern Scientific, Rockville, MD, USA).
The current–voltage curves were stored on a computer and
analysed using scope software (PowerLab, ADI Instru-
ments, Sydney, Australia). For single-channel recordings,
currents were amplified by a BLM 120 amplifier. Single-
channel currents were monitored using an oscilloscope
(TDS 3012, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA) and stored
on a CD recorder via a DRA 200 interface (Bio-Logic) for
off-line analysis. CD data were then analysed by winedr
(Bio-Logic) and clampfit (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale,
CA, USA) software. Data were filtered at 1 kHz before dig-
itizing at 11.2 kHz for analysis.
References
1 Nikaido H (2003) Molecular basis of bacterial outer
membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol
Rev 67, 593–656.
2 Jacob-Dubuisson F, Fernandez R & Coutte L (2004)
Protein secretion through autotransporter and two-part-
ner pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 1694, 235–257.
3 Moslavac S, Mirus O, Bredemeier R, Soll J, von
Haeseler A & Schleiff E (2005) Conserved pore-forming
regions in polypeptide-transporting proteins. FEBS J
272, 1367–1378.
4 Gentle IE, Burri L & Lithgow T (2005) Molecular
architecture and function ofthe Omp85 family of pro-
teins. Mol Microbiol 58, 1216–1225.
5 Koenig P, Mirus O, Haarmann R, Sommer MS,
Sinning I, Schleiff E & Tews I (2010) Conserved
properties of polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA)
domains derived from cyanobacterial Omp85. J Biol
Chem 285, 18016–18024.
6 Voulhoux R, Bos MP, Geurtsen J, Mols M & Tommas-
sen J (2003) Role ofa highly conserved bacterial protein
in outer membrane protein assembly. Science 299, 262–
265.
7 Bos MP, Robert V & Tommassen J (2007) Functioning
of outer membrane protein assembly factor Omp85
requires a single POTRA domain. EMBO Rep 8, 1149–
1154.
8 Knowles TJ, Scott-Tucker A, Overduin M & Henderson
IR (2009) Membrane protein architects: the role
of the BAM complex in outer membrane protein
assembly. Nat Rev Microbiol 7, 206–214.
9 Paschen SA, Waizenegger T, Stan T, Preuss M, Cyrk-
laff M, Hell K, Rapaport D & Neupert W (2003) Evo-
lutionary conservation of biogenesis of beta-barrel
membrane proteins. Nature 426, 862–866.
10 Wiedemann N, Kozjak V, Chacinska A, Schonfisch B,
Rospert S, Ryan MT, Pfanner N & Meisinger C (2003)
Machinery for protein sorting and assembly inthe mito-
chondrial outer membrane. Nature 424, 565–571.
11 Gentle I, Gabriel K, Beech P, Waller R & Lithgow T
(2004) The Omp85 family of proteins is essential for
outer membrane biogenesis in mitochondria and bacte-
ria. J Cell Biol 164, 19–24.
12 Schleiff E & Soll J (2005) Membrane protein insertion:
mixing eukaryotic and prokaryotic concepts. EMBO
Rep 6, 1023–1027.
13 Hodak H, Clantin B, Willery E, Villeret V, Locht C &
Jacob-Dubuisson F (2006) Secretion signal ofthe fila-
mentous haemagglutinin, a model two-partner secretion
substrate. Mol Microbiol 61, 368–382.
14 Meli AC, Hodak H, Clantin B, Locht C, Molle G,
Jacob-Dubuisson F & Saint N (2006) Channel proper-
ties of TpsB transporter FhaC point to two functional
domains with a C-terminal protein-conducting pore.
J Biol Chem 281, 158–166.
15 Clantin B, Hodak H, Willery E, Locht C, Jacob-Dub-
uisson F & Villeret V (2004) The crystal structure of
filamentous hemagglutinin secretion domain and its
implications for the two-partner secretion pathway.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 6194–6199.
16 Yeo HJ, Yokoyama T, Walkiewicz K, Kim Y, Grass S
& Geme JW III (2007) The structure ofthe Haemophi-
lus influenzae HMW1 pro-piece reveals a structural
domain essential for bacterial two-partner secretion.
J Biol Chem 282, 31076–31084.
17 Weaver TM, Hocking JM, Bailey LJ, Wawrzyn GT,
Howard DR, Sikkink LA, Ramirez-Alvarado M &
Thompson JR (2009) Structural and functional studies
of truncated hemolysin A from Proteus mirabilis. J Biol
Chem 284, 22297–22309.
18 Jacob-Dubuisson F, Villeret V, Clantin B, Delattre AS
& Saint N (2009) First structural insights into the
TpsB ⁄
Omp85 superfamily. Biol Chem 390, 675–684.
19 Kajava AV & Steven AC (2006) The turn ofthe screw:
variations ofthe abundant beta-solenoid motifin pas-
senger domains of Type V secretory proteins. J Struct
Biol 155, 306–315.
20 Jacob-Dubuisson F, Locht C & Antoine R (2001) Two-
partner secretion in Gram-negative bacteria: a thrifty,
specific pathway for large virulence proteins. Mol
Microbiol 40, 306–313.
21 Clantin B, Delattre AS, Rucktooa P, Saint N, Meli AC,
Locht C, Jacob-Dubuisson F & Villeret V (2007) Struc-
ture ofthe membrane protein FhaC: amemberof the
Omp85-TpsB transporter superfamily. Science 317, 957–
961.
22 Sanchez-Pulido L, Devos D, Genevrois S, Vicente M &
Valencia A (2003) POTRA: aconserved domain in the
FtsQ family and a class of beta-barrel outer membrane
proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 28, 523–526.
Importance ofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC A S. Delattre et al.
4764 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS
[...]... features ofFhaC,the outer membrane transporter involved inthe secretion ofthe Bordetella pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin J Biol Chem 275, 30202–30210 33 Coutte L, Antoine R, Drobecq H, Locht C & JacobDubuisson F (2001) Subtilisin-like autotransporter serves as maturation protease ina bacterial secretion pathway EMBO J 20, 5040–5048 34 Kabsch W (1993) Automatic processing of rotation diffraction... insertion of mitochondrial beta-barrel proteins Cell 132, 1011–1024 29 Bullmann L, Haarmann R, Mirus O, Bredemeier R, Hempel F, Maier UG & Schleiff E (2010) Filling the gap, evolutionarily conserved Omp85 in plastids of chromalveolates J Biol Chem 285, 6848–6856 Importanceofconservedmotifin transporter FhaC 30 Arnold T, Zeth K & Linke D (2010) Omp85 from the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus.. .A. -S Delattre et al 23 Jacob-Dubuisson F, El-Hamel C, Saint N, Guedin S, Willery E, Molle G & Locht C (1999) Channel formation by FhaC,the outer membrane protein involved inthe secretion ofthe Bordetella pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin J Biol Chem 274, 37731– 37735 24 Ertel F, Mirus O, Bredemeier R, Moslavac S, Becker T & Schleiff E (2005) The evolutionarily related beta-barrel polypeptide... diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants J Appl Crystallogr 26, 795–800 35 Brunger AT (2007) Version 1.2 ofthe Crystallography and NMR system Nat Protoc 2, 2728–2733 36 Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS et al (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure... polypeptide transporters from Pisum sativum and Nostoc PCC7120 contain two distinct functional domains J Biol Chem 280, 28281–28289 25 Robert V, Volokhina EB, Senf F, Bos MP, Van Gelder P & Tommassen J (2006) Assembly factor Omp85 recognizes its outer membrane protein substrates by a species-specific C-terminal motif PLoS Biol 4, e377 26 Stegmeier JF & Andersen C (2006) Characterization of pores formed by YaeT... elongatus differs from proteobacterial Omp85 in structure and domain composition J Biol Chem 285, 18003–18015 31 Jacob-Dubuisson F, Buisine C, Mielcarek N, Clement E, Menozzi FD & Locht C (1996) Amino-terminal maturation ofthe Bordetella pertussis filamentous haemagglutinin Mol Microbiol 19, 65–78 32 Guedin S, Willery E, Tommassen J, Fort E, Drobecq H, Locht C & Jacob-Dubuisson F (2000) Novel topological... Escherichia coli J Biochem 140, 275–283 27 Nesper J, Brosig A, Ringler P, Patel GJ, Muller SA, Kleinschmidt JH, Boos W, Diederichs K & Welte W (2008) Omp85(Tt) from Thermus thermophilus HB27: an ancestral type ofthe Omp85 protein family J Bacteriol 190, 4568–4575 28 Kutik S, Stojanovski D, Becker L, Becker T, Meinecke M, Kruger V, Prinz C, Meisinger C, Guiard B, Wagner R et al (2008) Dissecting membrane insertion... Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS et al (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination Acta Crystallogr D: Biol Crystallogr 54, 905–921 FEBS Journal 277 (2010) 4755–4765 ª 2010 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2010 FEBS 4765 . between the two proteins, arguing against a major con-
formational change of the loop. Structural data are available in the Protein Data Bank under the accession. visible in the
electron density map and are not included in the final
model. Structural data are available in the Protein Data
Bank database under the accession